Four decades of the Bart's Oxford study: Improved tests to predict type 1 diabetes

Islet Autoantibody Screening Throughout Australia Using In-Home Blood Spot Sampling: 2-Year Outcomes of Type1Screen

OBJECTIVE

Type1Screen offers islet autoantibody testing to Australians with a family history of type 1 diabetes (T1D) with the dual aims of preventing diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and enabling use of disease-modifying therapy. We describe screening and monitoring outcomes 2 years after implementing in-home capillary blood spot sampling.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Data from 2,064 participants who registered between July 2022 and June 2024 were analyzed: 1,507 and 557 chose blood spot and venipuncture screening respectively. We compared baseline characteristics and outcomes for 1,243 participants (967 blood spot and 276 venipuncture) whose samples were tested by June 2024.

RESULTS

One blood spot and five venous participants reported unsuccessful sample collections. The median (quartile 1, quartile 3) age of blood spot registrants was lower (12.1 [7.1, 27.1] vs. 17.2 [9, 38.4] years; P < 0.0001), and a higher proportion lived in regional Australia (39% vs. 29%; P = 0.0037). Among 72 participants (5.9%) with a positive screening test, 5 screened by blood spot and 2 by venipuncture had no autoantibodies on confirmatory testing. Blood spot screening identified the expected 2.1% prevalence of multiple autoantibodies and a 2.5% prevalence of a single autoantibody compared with 1.5% and 4.1%, respectively, for venipuncture screening. Clinical diabetes developed in 12 participants. All had screened positive and none had DKA.

CONCLUSIONS

Type1Screen has national reach. In-home blood spot screening is feasible, particularly for younger participants living regionally, and identifies the expected prevalence of preclinical T1D. The lower cost, increased convenience, and greater reach of blood spot screening could help meet increasing demand for early T1D diagnosis.

Improved Specificity of Glutamate Decarboxylase 65 Autoantibody Measurement Using Luciferase-Based Immunoprecipitation System Assays

Autoantibodies to glutamate decarboxylase (GADA) are widely used in the prediction and classification of type 1 diabetes. GADA radiobinding assays (RBAs) using N-terminally truncated antigens offer improved specificity, but radioisotopes limit the high-throughput potential for population screening. Luciferase-based immunoprecipitation system (LIPS) assays are sensitive and specific alternatives to RBAs with the potential to improve risk stratification. The performance of assays using the Nanoluc luciferase (Nluc)-conjugated GAD65 constructs, Nluc-GAD65(96-585) and full length Nluc-GAD65(1-585), were evaluated in 434 well-characterized serum samples from patients with recent-onset type 1 diabetes and first-degree relatives. Nonradioactive, high-throughput LIPS assays are quicker and require less serum than RBAs. Of 171 relatives previously tested single autoantibody positive for autoantibodies to full-length GAD65 by RBA but had not progressed to diabetes, fewer retested positive by LIPS using either truncated (n = 72) or full-length (n = 111) antigen. The Nluc-GAD65(96-585) truncation demonstrated the highest specificity in LIPS assays overall, but in contrast to RBA, N-terminus truncations did not result in a significant increase in disease-specificity compared with the full-length antigen. This suggests that binding of nonspecific antibodies is affected by the conformational changes resulting from addition of the Nluc antigen. Nluc-GAD65(96-585) LIPS assays offer low-blood-volume, high-specificity GADA tests for screening and diagnostics.

ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

A novel, high-performance, low-volume, rapid luciferase immunoprecipitation system (LIPS) assay to detect autoantibodies to zinc transporter 8

BACKGROUND

Zinc transporter 8 autoantibodies (ZnT8A) are thought to appear close to type 1 diabetes (T1D) onset and can identify high-risk multiple (≥2) autoantibody positive individuals. Radiobinding assays (RBA) are widely used for ZnT8A measurement but have limited sustainability. We sought to develop a novel, high-performance, non-radioactive luciferase immunoprecipitation system (LIPS) assay to replace RBA.

METHODS

A custom dual C-terminal ZnT8 (aa268-369; R325/W325) heterodimeric antigen, tagged with a NanoluciferaseTM (Nluc-ZnT8) reporter, and LIPS assay was developed. Assay performance was evaluated by testing sera from new onset T1D (n = 573), healthy schoolchildren (n = 521), and selected first-degree relatives (FDRs) from the Bart's Oxford family study (n = 617; 164 progressed to diabetes).

RESULTS

In new-onset T1D, ZnT8A levels by LIPS strongly correlated with RBA (Spearman's r = 0.89; P < 0.0001), and positivity was highly concordant (94.3%). At a high specificity (95%), LIPS and RBA had comparable assay performance [LIPS pROC-AUC(95) 0.032 (95% CI: 0.029-0.036); RBA pROC-AUC(95) 0.031 (95% CI: 0.028-0.034); P = 0.376]. Overall, FDRs found positive by LIPS or RBA had a comparable 20-year diabetes risk (52.6% and 59.7%, respectively), but LIPS positivity further stratified T1D risk in FDRs positive for at least one other islet autoantibody detected by RBA (P = 0.0346).

CONCLUSION

This novel, high-performance, cheaper, quicker, higher throughput, low blood volume Nluc-ZnT8 LIPS assay is a safe, non-radioactive alternative to RBA with enhanced sensitivity and ability to discriminate T1D progressors. This method offers an advanced approach to current strategies to screen the general population for T1D risk for immunotherapy trials and to reduce rates of diabetic ketoacidosis at diagnosis.

The importance of biomarker development for monitoring type 1 diabetes progression rate and therapeutic responsiveness

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune condition of children and adults in which immune cells target insulin-producing pancreatic β-cells for destruction. This results in a chronic inability to regulate blood glucose levels. The natural history of T1D is well-characterized in childhood. Evidence of two or more autoantibodies to the islet antigens insulin, GAD, IA-2 or ZnT8 in early childhood is associated with high risk of developing T1D in the future. Prediction of risk is less clear in adults and, overall, the factors controlling the progression rate from multiple islet autoantibody positivity to onset of symptoms are not fully understood. An anti-CD3 antibody, teplizumab, was recently shown to delay clinical progression to T1D in high-risk individuals including adults and older children. This represents an important proof of concept for those at risk of future T1D. Given their role in risk assessment, islet autoantibodies might appear to be the most obvious biomarkers to monitor efficacy. However, monitoring islet autoantibodies in clinical trials has shown only limited effects, although antibodies to the most recently identified autoantigen, tetraspanin-7, have not yet been studied in this context. Measurements of beta cell function remain fundamental to assessing efficacy and different models have been proposed, but improved biomarkers are required for both progression studies before onset of diabetes and in therapeutic monitoring. In this mini-review, we consider some established and emerging predictive and prognostic biomarkers, including markers of pancreatic function that could be integrated with metabolic markers to generate improved strategies to measure outcomes of therapeutic intervention.

The measurement of autoantibodies to insulin informs diagnosis of diabetes in a childhood population negative for other autoantibodies

AIMS

Some childhood type 1 diabetes cases are islet autoantibody negative at diagnosis. Potential explanations include misdiagnosis of genetic forms of diabetes or insufficient islet autoantibody testing. Many NHS laboratories offer combinations of three autoantibody markers. We sought to determine the benefit of testing for additional islet autoantibodies, including insulin (IAA) and tetraspanin 7 (TSPAN7A).

METHODS

Radiobinding assays (RBAs) were used to test for four islet autoantibodies in children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes (n = 486; 54.1% male; median age 10.4 years [range 0.7-18.0]; median duration 1 day [range -183 to 14]). Islet autoantibody negative children were tested for TSPAN7A using a luminescence-based test. Where available, islet cell antibody (ICA) and human leucocyte antigen (HLA) data were considered.

RESULTS

Using three autoantibody markers, 21/486 (4.3%) children were autoantibody negative. Testing for IAA classified a further 9/21 (42.9%) children as autoantibody positive. Of the remaining 12 (2.5%) autoantibody negative children, all were TPAN7A negative, seven were ICA negative and one was positive for the protective variant DQB1*0602. One was subsequently diagnosed with Maturity Onset of Diabetes in the Young, but follow-up was not available in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Using highly sensitive assays, testing for three autoantibodies fails to detect islet autoimmunity in approximately 1/20 children diagnosed with type 1 diabetes. Testing for IAA in children <5 years and GADA in those >10 years was the most effective strategy for detecting islet autoimmunity. The ability to test for all islet autoantibodies should inform clinical decisions and make screening for monogenic diabetes more cost-effective.