Diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers reflective of cardiac remodelling in diabetes mellitus: A scoping review

Ginsenoside Rb1 Ameliorates Heart Failure Ventricular Remodeling by Regulating the Twist1/PGC-1α/PPARα Signaling Pathway

Background: Heart failure (HF), the terminal stage of cardiovascular disease with high morbidity and mortality, remains poorly managed by current therapies. Ventricular remodeling in HF is fundamentally characterized by myocardial fibrosis. While ginsenoside Rb1 has demonstrated anti-fibrotic effects in HF, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Twist1, an upstream regulator of energy metabolism factors PGC-1α and PPARα, may attenuate fibrosis by preserving systemic energy homeostasis, suggesting its pivotal role in HF pathogenesis. This study explores ginsenoside Rb1's anti-HF mechanisms through the regulation of ginsenoside Rb1 on these metabolic regulators. Methods: Sprague Dawley rats were subjected to a ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery to induce an HF model, followed by ginsenoside Rb1 treatment for 6 weeks. Therapeutic effects were evaluated through cardiac function assessment, myocardial histopathological staining (HE, Masson, immunofluorescence, immunohistochemistry), mitochondrial morphology observation (transmission electron microscopy), energy metabolism analysis (electron transport chain efficiency, mitochondrial membrane potential, ATP content), and protein expression profiling (Twist1, PGC-1α, PPARα, GLUT4, PPARγ). Additionally, H9c2 cells induced with endothelin-1 to model HF were employed as an in vitro model to further investigate ginsenoside Rb1's regulatory effects on the Twist1/PGC-1α/PPARα signaling pathway. Results: Ginsenoside Rb1 can restore cardiac function in HF rats, improve mitochondrial function, alleviate energy metabolism disorders, and inhibit ventricular remodeling. By modulating the Twist1/PGC-1α/PPARα signaling pathway, ginsenoside Rb1 suppressed the abnormal overexpression of Twist1 and maintained normal expression of downstream PGC-1α and PPARα. In vitro experiments further demonstrated that ginsenoside Rb1 significantly inhibited Twist1 expression in H9c2 cardiomyocytes with HF while promoting PGC-1α and PPARα expression, thereby restoring myocardial energy metabolism and mitigating ventricular remodeling in HF. Conclusions: Ginsenoside Rb1 can inhibit the upregulation of Twist1 and activate the expression of its downstream PGC-1α and PPARα expression, by modulating the Twist1/PGC-1α/PPARα signaling pathway, alleviating ventricular remodeling in HF patients and improving myocardial energy metabolism dysfunction. Twist1 may be a key target for the treatment of HF. This study not only elucidates the mechanism by which ginsenoside Rb1 alleviates HF, but also provides new insights into the clinical treatment of HF.

Trajectory of Irisin as a Predictor of Kidney-Related Outcomes in Patients with Asymptomatic Heart Failure

The purpose of the study is to elucidate whether irisin is a promising predictive biomarker for kidney-related events in patients with T2DM and concomitant asymptomatic HF. We prospectively enrolled 146 T2DM patients who had either evidence of structural cardiac abnormality or elevated levels of N-terminal brain natriuretic pro-peptide (NT-proBNP) > 125 pmol/mL and followed them for 52 weeks. Structural cardiac abnormalities were used as the minimum from the following criteria: abnormal left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS) < -16%, LV hypertrophy, left atrial volume index > 34 mL/m2, abnormal ratio of early transmitral diastolic filling velocity/early mitral annular velocity ≥ 13 units. All the patients underwent echocardiographic and Doppler examinations by two blinded, highly experienced echocardiographers. NT-proBNP, irisin, TNF-alpha, and hs-CRP were quantified in the serum at baseline, at 26 weeks, and at the end of the study. The kidney-related outcomes consisted of an eGFR reduction by 40% from baseline, or end-stage kidney disease, or kidney replacement therapy. We found that levels of irisin at baseline < 4.15 ng/mL and/or its decrease > 20% from baseline in T2DM patients predicted kidney-related events better than baseline levels/dynamic NT-proBNP and the use of SGLT2 inhibitors. In conclusion, we established that a low baseline level of irisin and its 20% decrease correlated with newly kidney-related events in T2DM patients with asymptomatic HFpEF/HFmrEF.

Peptides Are Cardioprotective Drugs of the Future: The Receptor and Signaling Mechanisms of the Cardioprotective Effect of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists

The high mortality rate among patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is one of the main problems of modern cardiology. It is quite obvious that there is an urgent need to create more effective drugs for the treatment of AMI than those currently used in the clinic. Such drugs could be enzyme-resistant peptide analogs of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). GLP-1 receptor (GLP1R) agonists can prevent ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) cardiac injury. In addition, chronic administration of GLP1R agonists can alleviate the development of adverse cardiac remodeling in myocardial infarction, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. GLP1R agonists can protect the heart against oxidative stress and reduce proinflammatory cytokine (IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, and MCP-1) expression in the myocardium. GLP1R stimulation inhibits apoptosis, necroptosis, pyroptosis, and ferroptosis of cardiomyocytes. The activation of the GLP1R augments autophagy and mitophagy in the myocardium. GLP1R agonists downregulate reactive species generation through the activation of Epac and the GLP1R/PI3K/Akt/survivin pathway. The GLP1R, kinases (PKCε, PKA, Akt, AMPK, PI3K, ERK1/2, mTOR, GSK-3β, PKG, MEK1/2, and MKK3), enzymes (HO-1 and eNOS), transcription factors (STAT3, CREB, Nrf2, and FoxO3), KATP channel opening, and MPT pore closing are involved in the cardioprotective effect of GLP1R agonists.

Epidemiology of heart failure in diabetes: a disease in disguise

Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) without symptoms, and heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) represent the most common phenotypes of HF in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and are more common than HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) in these individuals. However, diagnostic criteria for HF have changed over the years, resulting in heterogeneity in the prevalence/incidence rates reported in different studies. We aimed to give an overview of the diagnosis and epidemiology of HF in type 2 diabetes, using both a narrative and systematic review approach; we focus narratively on diagnosing (using the 2021 European Society of Cardiology [ESC] guidelines) and screening for HF in type 2 diabetes. We performed an updated (2016-October 2022) systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting the prevalence and incidence of HF subtypes in adults ≥18 years with type 2 diabetes, using echocardiographic data. Embase and MEDLINE databases were searched and data were assessed using random-effects meta-analyses, with findings presented as forest plots. From the 5015 studies found, 209 were screened using the full-text article. In total, 57 studies were included, together with 29 studies that were identified in a prior meta-analysis; these studies reported on the prevalence of LVSD (n=25 studies, 24,460 individuals), LVDD (n=65 studies, 25,729 individuals), HFrEF (n=4 studies, 4090 individuals), HFmrEF (n=2 studies, 2442 individuals) and/or HFpEF (n=8 studies, 5292 individuals), and on HF incidence (n=7 studies, 17,935 individuals). Using Hoy et al's risk-of-bias tool, we found that the studies included generally had a high risk of bias. They showed a prevalence of 43% (95% CI 37%, 50%) for LVDD, 17% (95% CI 7%, 35%) for HFpEF, 6% (95% CI 3%, 10%) for LVSD, 7% (95% CI 3%, 15%) for HFrEF, and 12% (95% CI 7%, 22%) for HFmrEF. For LVDD, grade I was found to be most prevalent. Additionally, we reported a higher incidence rate of HFpEF (7% [95% CI 4%, 11%]) than HFrEF 4% [95% CI 3%, 7%]). The evidence is limited by the heterogeneity of the diagnostic criteria over the years. The systematic section of this review provides new insights on the prevalence/incidence of HF in type 2 diabetes, unveiling a large pre-clinical target group with LVDD/HFpEF in which disease progression could be halted by early recognition and treatment.Registration PROSPERO ID CRD42022368035.

The Role of Galectin-3 in Predicting Congenital Heart Disease Outcome: A Review of the Literature

Galectin-3 (Gal-3) is a novel pro-fibrotic biomarker that can predict both right and left cardiac dysfunction caused by various cardiovascular conditions. Its expression seems to be progressively altered with evolving cardiac remodeling processes, even before the onset of heart failure. Hence, Gal-3 has been found to be an individual predictor of acute and chronic heart failure or to serve as part of an integrated biomarker panel that can foresee adverse cardiac outcomes. In congenital heart disease (CHD), Gal-3 correlates with cardiac mortality and complications in both children and adults and is proposed as a therapeutic target in order to reverse the activation of pro-fibrosis pathways that lead to heart failure. Positive associations between serum Gal-3 levels, post-operatory hospitalization rates, complications and ventricular dysfunction have also been reported within studies conducted on patients with CHD who underwent corrective surgery. Thus, this review tried to address the potential utility of Gal-3 in patients with CHD and particularly in those who undergo corrective surgery. The heterogeneity of the literature data and the lack of validation of the results obtained by the current studies on larger cohorts cannot be neglected, though. Further longitudinal research is required to establish how Gal-3 can relate to long-term outcomes in pediatric CHD.