Patient-reported outcomes are worse for progressive-onset multiple sclerosis than relapse-onset multiple sclerosis, particularly early in the disease process

Examining the environmental risk factors of progressive-onset and relapsing-onset multiple sclerosis: recruitment challenges, potential bias, and statistical strategies

It is unknown whether the currently known risk factors of multiple sclerosis reflect the etiology of progressive-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) as observational studies rarely included analysis by type of onset. We designed a case-control study to examine associations between environmental factors and POMS and compared effect sizes to relapse-onset MS (ROMS), which will offer insights into the etiology of POMS and potentially contribute to prevention and intervention practice. This study utilizes data from the Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (PPMS) Study and the Australian Multi-center Study of Environment and Immune Function (the AusImmune Study). This report outlines the conduct of the PPMS Study, whether the POMS sample is representative, and the planned analysis methods. The study includes 155 POMS, 204 ROMS, and 558 controls. The distributions of the POMS were largely similar to Australian POMS patients in the MSBase Study, with 54.8% female, 85.8% POMS born before 1970, mean age of onset of 41.44 ± 8.38 years old, and 67.1% living between 28.9 and 39.4° S. The POMS were representative of the Australian POMS population. There are some differences between POMS and ROMS/controls (mean age at interview: POMS 55 years vs. controls 40 years; sex: POMS 53% female vs. controls 78% female; location of residence: 14.3% of POMS at a latitude ≤ 28.9°S vs. 32.8% in controls), which will be taken into account in the analysis. We discuss the methodological issues considered in the study design, including prevalence-incidence bias, cohort effects, interview bias and recall bias, and present strategies to account for it. Associations between exposures of interest and POMS/ROMS will be presented in subsequent publications.

Estimating the disutility of relapse in relapsing-remitting and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis using the EQ-5D-5L, AQoL-8D, EQ-5D-5L-psychosocial, and SF-6D: implications for health economic evaluation models

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Relapses are an important clinical feature of multiple sclerosis (MS) that result in temporary negative changes in quality of life (QoL), measured by health state utilities (HSUs) (disutilities). We aimed to quantify disutilities of relapse in relapsing remitting MS (RRMS), secondary progressive MS (SPMS), and relapse onset MS [ROMS (including both RRMS and SPMS)] and examine these values by disability severity using four multi-attribute utility instruments (MAUIs).

METHODS

We estimated (crude and adjusted and stratified by disability severity) disutilities (representing the mean difference in HSUs of 'relapse' and 'no relapse' groups as well as 'unsure' and 'no relapse' groups) in RRMS (n = 1056), SPMS (n = 239), and ROMS (n = 1295) cohorts from the Australian MS Longitudinal Study's 2020 QoL survey, using the EQ-5D-5L, AQoL-8D, EQ-5D-5L-Psychosocial, and SF-6D MAUIs.

RESULTS

Adjusted mean overall disutilities of relapse in RMSS/SPMS/ROMS were - 0.101/- 0.149/- 0.129 (EQ-5D-5L), - 0.092/- 0.167/- 0.113 (AQoL-8D), - 0.080/- 0.139/- 0.097 (EQ-5D-5L-Psychosocial), and - 0.116/- 0.161/- 0.130 (SF-6D), approximately 1.5 times higher in SPMS than in RRMS, in all MAUI. All estimates were statistically significant and/or clinically meaningful. Adjusted disutilities of RRMS and ROMS demonstrated a U-shaped relationship between relapse disutilities and disability severity. Relapse disutilities were higher in 'severe' disability than 'mild' and 'moderate' in the SPMS cohort.

CONCLUSION

MS-related relapses are associated with substantial utility decrements. As the type and severity of MS influence disutility of relapse, the use of disability severity and MS-type-specific disutility inputs is recommended in future health economic evaluations of MS. Our study supports relapse management and prevention as major mechanisms to improve QoL in people with MS.

Patient-reported outcomes are the strongest predictors of disease disability in intramuscular interferon beta-1a users

Introduction: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are valuable measures for routine clinical care of people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Materials: 646 pwMS treated with interferon-β-1a (IFN-β-1a) were retrospectively included from the New York State Multiple Sclerosis Consortium. Clinical and PRO data at enrollment and 3 year follow-up were collected. PwMS with stable disease and disability worsening were matched (1:1) based on age, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores and disease duration. Disability worsening was determined based on trial criteria. Results: PwMS with future EDSS worsening had higher baseline and follow-up timed-25-foot walk (6.6 vs 5.5 s; 9.1 vs 5.5 s; p < .001) when compared with stable pwMS. Worsening pwMS reported higher baseline difficulties in getting up (odds ratio [OR] = 2.4; p = 0.009), climbing stairs (OR = 1.6; p = 0.024) and standing (OR = 2.2; p < 0.001). Worsening pwMS reported greater lower limb limitations (OR = 2.3; p = 0.004) and fatigue (OR = 1.8; p = 0.002). Conclusion: Higher fatigue and lower limb functional limitations are significant predictors of future disability worsening in pwMS.

Patient reported outcomes in a secondary progressive MS cohort related to cognition, MRI and physical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly being used as outcomes in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) trials. We examined how PROs reflect disease burden in SPMS.

METHODS

In this observational prospective study, 65 SPMS patients were examined by five different PROs (Fatigue Scale Motor Cognition (FSMC), Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale version 2 (MSIS-29v2), 36-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2), EQ-5D-5L and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Multiple Sclerosis version 2.0 (WPAI:MS)); two different rating scales, Multiple Sclerosis Impairment Scale (MSIS) and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS); functional tests of mobility (Timed-25-Foot Walk (T-25FW), 6-Spot Step Test (6-SST) and (9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT)); cognitive tests (Symbol Digital Modalities Test (SDMT) and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised (BVMT-R)); and multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).

RESULTS

When the PROs were divided into physical and psychological subscores, the PRO physical subscores of FSMC, MSIS-29v2 and SF-36v2 correlated with physical rating scales (EDSS, MSIS) and physical measures of upper (9-HPT) and lower extremity function (T-25FW and 6-SST)) (p = 0.04-0.0001). 9-HPT correlated the least with physical subscores of PROs but showed the strongest correlation with activity impairment (subscore of WPAI:MS). In contrast, psychological PRO subscores of FSMC, MSIS-29v2 and SF-36v2 did not reflect the cognitive outcomes (SDMT and BVMT-R), although the cognitive scores correlated with disease burden indicated by MRI lesion volumes. The psychological PRO subscores did not correlate with fatigue, physical and MRI outcomes either.

CONCLUSION

Correlation between PRO physical subscores and physical outcomes supports PROs as potentially useful clinical endpoints in SPMS. The results of this study indicate that patients with SPMS highly perceive their mobility on function of their lower extremities, while they perceive their daily activities highly dependent on function of the upper extremities. Psychological subscores of MS specific PROs may be less suitable as surrogate markers for the cognitive status and should be considered as a mental quality of life measurement independent of disease burden.

Using the EQ-5D-5L to investigate quality-of-life impacts of disease-modifying therapy policies for people with multiple sclerosis (MS) in New Zealand

BACKGROUND

Health state utilities (HSU) are a health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) input for cost-utility analyses used for resource allocation decisions, including medication reimbursement. New Zealand (NZ) guidelines recommend the EQ-5D instruments; however, the EQ-5D-5L may not sufficiently capture psychosocial health. We evaluated HRQoL among people with multiple sclerosis (MS) in NZ using the EQ-5D-5L and assessed the instrument's discriminatory sensitivity for a NZ MS cohort.

METHODS

Participants were recruited from the NZ MS Prevalence Study. Participants self-completed a 45-min online survey that included the EQ-5D-5L/EQ-VAS. Disability severity was classified using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) to categorise participant disability as mild (EDSS: 0-3.5), moderate (EDSS: 4.0-6.0) and severe (EDSS: 6.5-9.5). Anxiety/depression were also measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (HADS). In the absence of an EQ-5D-5L NZ tariff, HSUs were derived using an Australian tariff. We evaluated associations between HSUs and participant characteristics with linear regression models.

RESULTS

254 participants entered the study. Mean age was 55.2 years, 79.5% were female. Mean (SD) EQ-5D-5L HSU was 0.58 (0.33). Mean (SD) HSUs for disability categories were: mild 0.80 ± 0.17, moderate 0.57 ± 0.21 and severe 0.14 ± 0.32. Twelve percent reported HSU = 1.0 (i.e., no problems in any domain). Participants who had never used a disease-modifying therapy reported a lower mean HSU. Multivariable modelling found that the HADS anxiety score was not associated with EQ-5D-5L.

CONCLUSIONS

HRQoL for people with MS in NZ was lower than comparable countries, including Australia. We suggest a comparison with other generic tools that may have improved sensitivity to mental health.

Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction Over the Course of Multiple Sclerosis: A Review

Neurogenic bowel dysfunction ranks as one of the most frequent problems experienced by people with multiple sclerosis (MS); it is one of the first symptoms to appear at disease onset and continues throughout the course of the disease. This review, based on literature searches of Medline and PubMed, examines bowel dysfunction causes and cofactors (ie, impaired mobility, fatigue, depression and anxiety, childbirth) that occur over the course of the disease. Coverage includes management of bowel dysfunction with noninvasive methods, including diet and fluid intake, together with pharmacologic treatments for constipation and fecal incontinence as well as more advanced treatments (ie, biofeedback, abdominal massage, transanal irrigation, posterior tibial nerve stimulation), caregiver-provided treatments and extended care facilities. Bowel dysfunction problems and related cofactors impact quality of life throughout the MS disease course, requiring appropriate interventions to improve and/or maintain the quality of life of the individual with MS.

Does health-related quality of life differ between people with relapse onset and progressive onset Multiple Sclerosis?

BACKGROUND

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) can be categorised as relapse onset MS (ROMS) and progressive onset MS (PROMS). We aimed to examine if health-related quality of life (in terms of health state utilities [HSUs] and dimensional scores) differed by onset type, in which health dimensions the differences were most pronounced, and whether these differences remained when stratified by disability severity.

METHODS

We estimated HSUs and the unique composite 'super-dimension' and 'individual dimension' scores (crude, age, sex, disease duration and disease modifying therapies use adjusted; and stratified by onset type and disability severity) for a sample of 1577 participants in the Australian MS Longitudinal Study, using the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL)-8D.

RESULTS

Adjusted mean overall HSU of PROMS was 0.55, 0.07 lower than ROMS. Adjusted mean physical and psychosocial super-dimension scores for PROMS were 0.51 and 0.28, 0.07 and 0.06 lower than for ROMS, respectively. For the individual health dimensions, the largest difference was seen in independent living (-0.12), followed by relationships (-0.07), and self-worth (-0.07). Whilst HSUs and dimensional scores were negatively associated with increasing disability severity in both onset types, estimates by disability severity did not differ between the two cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides a comprehensive assessment of the effects of MS onset type on the overall and disability-severity specific HRQoL scores using a detailed preferentially sensitive AQoL-8D instrument. While overall HRQoL was substantially lower in PROMS than in ROMS, the mean HRQoL values for each disability level did not differ by onset type, indicating that future health economic models can use the same HSU inputs for both onset types.

Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Different Diseases Measured With the EQ-5D-5L: A Systematic Review

Background: The EQ-5D-5L is a generic preference-based questionnaire developed by the EuroQol Group to measure health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in 2005. Since its development, it has been increasingly applied in populations with various diseases and has been found to have good reliability and sensitivity. This study aimed to summarize the health utility elicited from EQ-5D-5L for patients with different diseases in cross-sectional studies worldwide.

Methods: Web of Science, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 1, 2012, to October 31, 2019. Cross-sectional studies reporting utility values measured with the EQ-5D-5L in patients with any specific disease were eligible. The language was limited to English. Reference lists of the retrieved studies were manually searched to identify more studies that met the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality was assessed with the Agency for Health Research and Quality (AHRQ) checklist. In addition, meta-analyses were performed for utility values of any specific disease reported in three or more studies.

Results: In total, 9,400 records were identified, and 98 studies met the inclusion criteria. In the included studies, 50 different diseases and 98,085 patients were analyzed. Thirty-five studies involving seven different diseases were included in meta-analyses. The health utility ranged from 0.31 to 0.99 for diabetes mellitus [meta-analysis random-effect model (REM): 0.83, (95% CI = 0.77–0.90); fixed-effect model (FEM): 0.93 (95% CI = 0.93–0.93)]; from 0.62 to 0.90 for neoplasms [REM: 0.75 (95% CI = 0.68–0.82); FEM: 0.80 (95% CI = 0.78–0.81)]; from 0.56 to 0.85 for cardiovascular disease [REM: 0.77 (95% CI = 0.75–0.79); FEM: 0.76 (95% CI = 0.75–0.76)]; from 0.31 to 0.78 for multiple sclerosis [REM: 0.56 (95% CI = 0.47–0.66); FEM: 0.67 (95% CI = 0.66–0.68)]; from 0.68 to 0.79 for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [REM: 0.75 (95% CI = 0.71–0.80); FEM: 0.76 (95% CI = 0.75–0.77)] from 0.65 to 0.90 for HIV infection [REM: 0.84 (95% CI = 0.80–0.88); FEM: 0.81 (95% CI = 0.80–0.82)]; from 0.37 to 0.89 for chronic kidney disease [REM: 0.70 (95% CI = 0.48–0.92; FEM: 0.76 (95% CI = 0.74–0.78)].

Conclusions: EQ-5D-5L is one of the most widely used preference-based measures of HRQoL in patients with different diseases worldwide. The variation of utility values for the same disease was influenced by the characteristics of patients, the living environment, and the EQ-5D-5L value set.

Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42020158694.

Deciphering Multiple Sclerosis Progression

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is primarily an inflammatory and degenerative disease of the central nervous system, triggered by unknown environmental factors in patients with predisposing genetic risk profiles. The prevention of neurological disability is one of the essential goals to be achieved in a patient with MS. However, the pathogenic mechanisms driving the progressive phase of the disease remain unknown. It was described that the pathophysiological mechanisms associated with disease progression are present from disease onset. In daily practice, there is a lack of clinical, radiological, or biological markers that favor an early detection of the disease's progression. Different definitions of disability progression were used in clinical trials. According to the most descriptive, progression was defined as a minimum increase in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) of 1.5, 1.0, or 0.5 from a baseline level of 0, 1.0–5.0, and 5.5, respectively. Nevertheless, the EDSS is not the most sensitive scale to assess progression, and there is no consensus regarding any specific diagnostic criteria for disability progression. This review document discusses the current pathophysiological concepts associated with MS progression, the different measurement strategies, the biomarkers associated with disability progression, and the available pharmacologic therapeutic approaches.

Measuring outcomes that matter most to people with multiple sclerosis: the role of patient-reported outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) represents a unique opportunity to measure the impact of health research, and care on outcomes that matter most to people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS).

RECENT FINDINGS

How to incorporate PROs in MS clinical trials and, practice remains a matter of debate. The variety of measures available for use in MS has some benefits, but the lack of a set of standard measures has significant disadvantages. To help meeting the challenge, different PROs standard sets have been developed (PROMIS) for use across a broad range of chronic health conditions, and SymptoMScreen, specifically for MS. However, many of them were not co-created with PwMS and lacking understanding about what matters to patients. The newly proposed MS care unit model together with emerging initiatives such as iConquerMS and PROMOPROMS, are shaping new meaningful PROs. However, the uptake of PROMs in all settings can be effective only by a commonly held strategic agenda shared by all relevant stakeholders.

SUMMARY

The newly born PRO Initiative for MS (PROMS) aims to develop a strategic agenda shared by all relevant stakeholders to help meeting the challenge of developing PRO measures that correspond to the needs of all stakeholders.

Quality of life in adults with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

In recent years, quality of life (QoL) in multiple sclerosis (MS) has been gaining considerable importance in clinical research and practice. Against this backdrop, this systematic review aimed to provide a broad overview of clinical, sociodemographic and psychosocial risk and protective factors for QoL in adults with MS and analyse psychological interventions for improving QoL.

METHOD

The literature search was conducted in the Scopus, Web of Science and ProQuest electronic databases. Document type was limited to articles written in English, published from January 1, 2014, to January 31, 2019. Information from the selected articles was extracted using a coding sheet and then qualitatively synthesised.

RESULTS

The search identified 4886 records. After duplicate removal and screening, 106 articles met the inclusion and exclusion criteria for qualitative synthesis and were assessed for study quality. Disability, fatigue, depression, cognitive impairment and unemployment were consistently identified as QoL risk factors, whereas higher self-esteem, self-efficacy, resilience and social support proved to be protective. The review analysed a wide spectrum of approaches for QoL psychological intervention, such as mindfulness, cognitive behavioural therapy, self-help groups and self-management. The majority of interventions were successful in improving various aspects of QoL.

CONCLUSION

Adequate biopsychosocial assessment is of vital importance to treat risk and promote protective factors to improve QoL in patients with MS in general care practice.

Comparing Health Promotion and Quality of Life in People with Progressive Versus Nonprogressive Multiple Sclerosis

Background

People with multiple sclerosis (MS) benefit from engaging in health promotion. Most studies have been conducted with those having relapsing-remitting MS; information about health promotion for those with progressive MS is more limited. In this study, health promotion and quality of life (QOL) for people with progressive versus nonprogressive MS were systematically examined and compared.

Methods

These data are from years 21 and 22 of an ongoing longitudinal study of persons with MS. Participants were compared on demographic, psychosocial, and health promotion factors and 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) QOL subscales. Based on the conceptual framework, barriers, symptom clusters, social supports, and health promotion activities were entered into hierarchical multivariate regressions to predict selected SF-36 subscale scores separately for those with progressive versus nonprogressive MS after controlling for variance associated with years of education and MS incapacity.

Results

Analyses included 72 respondents with progressive MS and 117 with nonprogressive MS. People with progressive MS reported significantly less frequent health promotion and lower scores on SF-36 physical role limitations and social functioning. Symptoms were a strong and significant predictor for all three SF-36 subscales in both groups. The explained variances in the hierarchical models differed significantly by MS course, with adjusted R ² scores ranging from 0.17 to 0.30 in progressive MS and 0.35 to 0.45 in nonprogressive MS.

Conclusions

Findings underscore the importance of symptom severity in relation to health promotion and QOL in people with long-standing MS. Future research should explore additional contributors to QOL for those with progressive MS.

Change and onset-type differences in the prevalence of comorbidities in people with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the change in prevalence of comorbidities during the disease course of people with multiple sclerosis (MS) and whether the prevalences vary by MS onset type.

OBJECTIVE

To calculate the change in prevalence of comorbidities between symptom onset and the time of study, to compare the prevalences of comorbidities with those in the Australian population at the time of study and to examine onset-type differences.

METHODS

Comorbidity data from 1518 participants of the Australian MS Longitudinal Study and Australian population comparator data (2014-2015 National Health Survey) were used. The change in prevalence between time points and prevalence ratios (PR) at the time of study (crude, age and sex adjusted, and stratified by onset type) was calculated.

RESULTS

Comorbidities were common, and those with the largest increases in prevalence between MS symptom onset and the time of study were depression (+ 26.9%), anxiety (+ 23.1%), hypertension (+ 21.9%), elevated cholesterol (+ 16.3%), osteoarthritis (+ 17.1%), eye diseases (+ 11.6%), osteoporosis (+ 10.9%) and cancer (+ 10.3%). Compared to the general population and after age and sex adjustment, participants had a significantly higher prevalence for 14/19 comorbidities at the time of study. The associations were strongest for anaemia, cancer (both PR > 4.00), anxiety, depression, migraine (all PR > 3.00), psoriasis and epilepsy (both PR > 2.00). No significant differences were seen by onset type.

CONCLUSION

Comorbidities are common at MS symptom onset and increase with MS duration. Having MS may thus contribute to accrual of comorbidities. This emphasises the importance of optimal screening for and management of comorbidities in early MS and throughout the disease course.

Risk factors for leaving employment due to multiple sclerosis and changes in risk over the past decades: Using competing risk survival analysis

Background:

No studies have assessed changes in employment survival in multiple sclerosis (MS) populations over recent decades, including the introduction of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs).

Objectives:

To evaluate factors associated with leaving employment due to MS; to assess whether the risk of leaving employment has changed over recent decades in Australia, stratified by MS phenotype.

Methods:

We included 1240 participants who were working before MS diagnosis. Information on employment status, reasons for leaving employment and year of leaving were collected. Data were analysed using competing risk survival analysis.

Results:

Males, progressive MS, lower education level and older age at diagnosis were associated with a higher sub-distribution hazard of leaving employment. Compared to the period before 2010, the sub-distribution hazard during 2010–2016 for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) was reduced by 43% (sub-distribution hazard ratio (sHR) 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50 to 0.90), while no significant reduction was seen for primary-progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) (sHR 1.25, 95% CI: 0.72 to 2.16) or secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) (sHR 1.37, 95% CI: 0.84 to 2.25).

Conclusion:

Males, people with progressive MS and those of lower education level were at higher risk of leaving employment. The differential changed risk of leaving employment between people with different MS phenotype after 2010 coincides with the increased usage of high-efficacy DMTs for RRMS.

Workplace difficulties, health-related quality of life, and perception of stigma from the perspective of patients with Multiple Sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

In Multiple Sclerosis (MS), withdrawal from employment is a critical problem. This study explores relationships between disease characteristics, work difficulties, health-related quality of life, depression, and stigma and how these factors affect employment status.

METHODS

A multicenter, non-interventional, cross-sectional study was conducted in adults with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and primary progressive MS (PPMS). Patient-reported questionnaires included: 23-item Multiple Sclerosis Work Difficulties Questionnaire, 29-item Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale, Stigma Scale for Chronic Illness, and Beck Depression Inventory-Fast Screen.

RESULTS

A total of 199 individuals (mean age = 43.9 ± 10.5 years, 60.8% female, 86.4% with RRMS) participated in the study. Mean time from diagnosis was 9.6 ± 7.2 years and median Expanded Disability Status Scale score was 2.0 (interquartile range: 1.0-3.5). Employment rate was 47.2% (n = 94). Mean physical and psychological MSIS-29 impact sub-scores were 40.38 ± 17.1 and 20.24 ± 7.8, respectively. Forty patients (19.9%) had at least one SSCI-8 item with a score of 4 or 5, suggesting the presence of stigma often or always. Eighty-one patients (40.7%) were depressed and 25 (12.6%) had moderate-to-severe depression. Work difficulties were higher in those with worse functional status, a diagnosis of PPMS, and lower educational levels. Employed participants had lower perceptions of stigma and depressive symptoms than those not employed. Higher perceptions of stigma were also strongly linked to higher physical and psychological impact on health-related quality of life and greater work difficulties. Depressive symptoms were also strongly related to work-related problems.

CONCLUSIONS

Work difficulties, stigma and poor quality of life are common in MS patients, even in a population with low physical disability. Evaluation of these dimensions in clinical practice would allow the development of targeted rehabilitation and specific work plans for MS employers.

A randomized pragmatic trial of telephone-delivered cognitive behavioral-therapy, modafinil, and combination therapy of both for fatigue in multiple sclerosis: The design of the "COMBO-MS" trial

BACKGROUND

Fatigue is one of the most common and disabling chronic symptoms in multiple sclerosis (MS). Optimization of available treatments for MS-related fatigue has been stymied by lack of comparative effectiveness research that focuses on real-world treatment delivery methods and potential modification of treatment effect by other chronic MS symptoms or disability level. This report describes the design of a patient centered, comparative effectiveness trial of cognitive behavioral-therapy (CBT), modafinil, and combination therapy of both for fatigue in MS ("COMBO-MS").

METHODS

We describe the methods of this pragmatic comparative effectiveness trial that is guided by a team of patient, family, provider, community, and payer stakeholders. Eligible participants with MS and significant fatigue severity are randomly assigned (1:1:1) to received either CBT, modafinil, or a combination of CBT and modafinil for 12 weeks. The primary outcome is change in fatigue impact as measured by the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) at 12 weeks. Secondary outcome measures include ecological momentary assessment (EMA) measures of fatigue intensity, fatigue interference, and fatigability (measured over 7 days' time at baseline and at 12 weeks), and change in MFIS score at 24 weeks.

PROJECTED OUTCOMES

We hypothesize that combination therapy will more effectively ameliorate fatigue severity than either monotherapy, and that heterogeneity of treatment effects will be found based on depression status, presence of known or suspected sleep disorder, and disease severity. Study findings will assist patients, providers, payers, and policy makers to provide more effective care for managing fatigue in MS.

Advances in the Understanding and Management of Chronic Pain in Multiple Sclerosis: a Comprehensive Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disorder of the central nervous system that can lead to severe physical, cognitive, and neurological deficits that often manifest in young adults. Central neuropathic pain is a common presenting symptom, often prompting patients to seek treatment with opioids, NSAIDS, antiepileptics, and antidepressants despite minimal effectiveness and alarming side-effect profiles. Additionally, spasticity occurs in more than 80% of MS patients and is an important consideration for further study in treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Related to inconsistencies in pain presentation and clinical reporting, current studies continue to investigate clinical patient presentation to define chronic pain characteristics to optimize treatment plans. Although often neuropathic in origin, the complex nature of such pain necessitates a multimodal approach for adequate treatment. While psychiatric comorbidities typically remain unchanged in their severity over time, physical conditions may lead to worsening chronic pain long-term, often due to decreased quality of life. The prevalence of neuropathic pain is ~ 86% in patients with multiple sclerosis and most commonly presents as extremity pain, trigeminal neuralgia, back pain, or headaches. As MS symptoms are frequently unremitting and poorly responsive to conventional medical management, recent attention has been given to novel interventions for management of pain. Among these, medicinal cannabis therapy, targeted physical therapy, and neuromodulation offer promising results. In this review, we provide a comprehensive update of the current perspective of MS pathophysiology, symptomatology, and treatment.

Oral health and behaviours of people living with Multiple Sclerosis in Australia

OBJECTIVES

The literature describing the oral health of people with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is scant and the findings equivocal. The aim of this study was to describe the oral health and oral self-care behaviours of people living with MS and compare it to the Australian population.

METHODS

Participants enrolled with the Australian MS Longitudinal Study (AMSLS) were invited to participate in the survey using an online or paper-based questionnaire. Data were collected on level of disability, oral health, oral self-care and factors influencing attendance for oral health care.

RESULTS

Completed questionnaires were received for 1523 respondents. Over one-fifth (n = 320; 22%) rated their oral health as fair or poor, and more than half (n = 840; 57%) reported toothache in the last 12 months. These proportions were higher than those for the general Australian adult population (oral health prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.25 [1.12, 1.40]; toothache PR = 3.63 [3.39, 3.88]), and this is despite comparable or better self-maintenance habits and dental attendance reported by respondents. People with MS reported high rates of mouth dryness (68.4%), teeth sensitivity (64.7%), change of taste (40.5%) and orofacial pain (39.0%); fewer than 10% experienced none of these. There was a lower prevalence of self-reported need for treatment (extraction or filling) than in the Australian adult population (15.8% vs 32.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

People with MS have a greater oral health burden, demonstrated by their poorer self-reported oral health than the Australian adult population. Furthermore, they experience high rates of toothache, mouth dryness, teeth sensitivity, change of taste and orofacial pain. These findings are contrary to their self-reported good oral self-care and dental attendance habits and suggest some of the oral health impacts are due to MS rather than dental behaviours.