1
|
Carnero Contentti E, Pestchanker C, Ciampi E, Castro Suarez S, Caparo Zamalloa C, Daccach Marques V, Messias K, Gortari JI, Tkachuk V, Silva B, Mainella C, Reyes S, Toro J, Rodriguez J, Correa‐Diaz E, Rojas JI, Paul F. The real-world applicability of the 2023 international myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease criteria in a Latin American cohort. Eur J Neurol 2024; 31:e16445. [PMID: 39287067 PMCID: PMC11554853 DOI: 10.1111/ene.16445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2024] [Revised: 07/11/2024] [Accepted: 08/02/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The diagnostic criteria for myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody (MOG-IgG)-associated disease (MOGAD) were published in 2023. We aimed to determine the performance of the new criteria in Latin American (LATAM) patients compared with the 2018 criteria and explore the significance of MOG-IgG titers in diagnosis. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of LATAM (Argentina, Chile, Brazil, Peru, Ecuador, and Colombia) adult patients with one clinical MOGAD event and MOG-IgG positivity confirmed by cell-based assay. Both 2018 and 2023 MOGAD criteria were applied, calculating diagnostic performance indicators. RESULTS Among 171 patients (predominantly females, mean age at first attack = 34.1 years, mean disease duration = 4.5 years), 98.2% patients met the 2018 criteria, and of those who did not fulfill diagnostic criteria (n = 3), all tested positive for MOG-IgG (one low-positive and two without reported titer). Additionally, 144 (84.2%) patients met the 2023 criteria, of whom 57 (39.5%) had MOG-IgG+ titer information (19 clearly positive and 38 low-positive), whereas 87 (60.5%) patients had no MOG-IgG titer. All 144 patients met diagnostic supporting criteria. The remaining 27 patients did not meet the 2023 MOGAD criteria due to low MOG-IgG (n = 12) or lack of titer antibody access (n = 15), associated with the absence of supporting criteria. The 2023 MOGAD criteria showed a sensitivity of 86% (95% confidence interval = 0.80-0.91) and specificity of 100% compared to the 2018 criteria. CONCLUSIONS These findings support the diagnostic utility of the 2023 MOGAD criteria in an LATAM cohort in real-world practice, despite limited access to MOG-IgG titration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ethel Ciampi
- Neurology DepartmentHospital Dr. Sótero del Río y Universidad Católica de ChileSantiagoChile
| | - Sheila Castro Suarez
- Basic Research Center in Dementia and Central Nervous System Demyelinating DiseasesInstituto Nacional de Ciencias NeurológicasLimaPeru
| | - Cesar Caparo Zamalloa
- Basic Research Center in Dementia and Central Nervous System Demyelinating DiseasesInstituto Nacional de Ciencias NeurológicasLimaPeru
| | - Vanesa Daccach Marques
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão PretoUniversidade de São PauloSão PauloBrazil
| | - Katharina Messias
- Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão PretoUniversidade de São PauloSão PauloBrazil
| | | | | | - Berenice Silva
- Neurology DepartmentHospital Italiano de Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina
| | | | - Saúl Reyes
- Neurology DepartmentFundación Santa Fe de BogotáBogotáColombia
- School of MedicineUniversidad de los AndesBogotáColombia
- Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and DentistryQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
| | - Jaime Toro
- Neurology DepartmentFundación Santa Fe de BogotáBogotáColombia
- School of MedicineUniversidad de los AndesBogotáColombia
| | - Juan Rodriguez
- Neurology DepartmentFundación Santa Fe de BogotáBogotáColombia
- School of MedicineUniversidad de los AndesBogotáColombia
| | - Edgar Correa‐Diaz
- Department of NeurologyHospital Carlos Andrade MarínQuitoEcuador
- Pontificia Universidad Católica del EcuadorQuitoEcuador
| | - Juan I. Rojas
- Neurology DepartmentCentro de Esclerosis Múltiple de Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina
| | - Friedemann Paul
- NeuroCure Clinical Research CenterCharité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of HealthBerlinGermany
- Experimental and Clinical Research CenterMax Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité—Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Geraldes R, Arrambide G, Banwell B, Rovira À, Cortese R, Lassmann H, Messina S, Rocca MA, Waters P, Chard D, Gasperini C, Hacohen Y, Mariano R, Paul F, DeLuca GC, Enzinger C, Kappos L, Leite MI, Sastre-Garriga J, Yousry T, Ciccarelli O, Filippi M, Barkhof F, Palace J. The influence of MOGAD on diagnosis of multiple sclerosis using MRI. Nat Rev Neurol 2024; 20:620-635. [PMID: 39227463 DOI: 10.1038/s41582-024-01005-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/26/2024] [Indexed: 09/05/2024]
Abstract
Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) is an immune-mediated demyelinating disease that is challenging to differentiate from multiple sclerosis (MS), as the clinical phenotypes overlap, and people with MOGAD can fulfil the current MRI-based diagnostic criteria for MS. In addition, the MOG antibody assays that are an essential component of MOGAD diagnosis are not standardized. Accurate diagnosis of MOGAD is crucial because the treatments and long-term prognosis differ from those for MS. This Expert Recommendation summarizes the outcomes from a Magnetic Resonance Imaging in MS workshop held in Oxford, UK in May 2022, in which MS and MOGAD experts reflected on the pathology and clinical features of these disorders, the contributions of MRI to their diagnosis and the clinical use of the MOG antibody assay. We also critically reviewed the literature to assess the validity of distinctive imaging features in the current MS and MOGAD criteria. We conclude that dedicated orbital and spinal cord imaging (with axial slices) can inform MOGAD diagnosis and also illuminate differential diagnoses. We provide practical guidance to neurologists and neuroradiologists on how to navigate the current MOGAD and MS criteria. We suggest a strategy that includes useful imaging discriminators on standard clinical MRI and discuss imaging features detected by non-conventional MRI sequences that demonstrate promise in differentiating these two disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Geraldes
- NMO Service, Department of Neurology, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
- Wexham Park Hospital, Frimley Health Foundation Trust, Slough, UK.
| | - Georgina Arrambide
- Neurology-Neuroimmunology Department, Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Brenda Banwell
- Division of Child Neurology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Àlex Rovira
- Section of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rosa Cortese
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Hans Lassmann
- Center for Brain Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Silvia Messina
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
- Wexham Park Hospital, Frimley Health Foundation Trust, Slough, UK
| | - Mara Assunta Rocca
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Patrick Waters
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - Declan Chard
- NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals (CLH) Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Claudio Gasperini
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Department of Neurosciences, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Yael Hacohen
- Department of Paediatric Neurology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - Romina Mariano
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - Friedemann Paul
- Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gabriele C DeLuca
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - Christian Enzinger
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Division of Neuroradiology, Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Ludwig Kappos
- Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience, University Hospital and University, Basel, Switzerland
| | - M Isabel Leite
- NMO Service, Department of Neurology, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - Jaume Sastre-Garriga
- Neurology-Neuroimmunology Department, Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Tarek Yousry
- NMR Research Unit, Queen Square MS Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Olga Ciccarelli
- Department of Neuroinflammation, Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
- University College London Hospitals (UCLH) National Institute for Health and Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), London, UK
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Neurology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jacqueline Palace
- NMO Service, Department of Neurology, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rovira À, Vidal-Jordana A, Auger C, Sastre-Garriga J. Optic Nerve Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2024; 34:399-420. [PMID: 38942524 DOI: 10.1016/j.nic.2024.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/30/2024]
Abstract
Optic neuritis is a common feature in multiple sclerosis and in 2 other autoimmune demyelinating disorders such as aquaporin-4 IgG antibody-associated neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease. Although serologic testing is critical for differentiating these different autoimmune-mediated disorders, MR imaging, which is the preferred imaging modality for assessing the optic nerve, can provide valuable information, suggesting a specific diagnosis and guiding the appropriate serologic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Àlex Rovira
- Department of Radiology, Section of Neuroradiology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Autonomous Univesity of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Angela Vidal-Jordana
- Department of Neurology, Centro de Esclerosis Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cristina Auger
- Department of Radiology, Section of Neuroradiology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Autonomous Univesity of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jaume Sastre-Garriga
- Department of Neurology, Centro de Esclerosis Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Carnero Contentti E, Okuda DT, Rojas JI, Chien C, Paul F, Alonso R. MRI to differentiate multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica, and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease. J Neuroimaging 2023; 33:688-702. [PMID: 37322542 DOI: 10.1111/jon.13137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Differentiating multiple sclerosis (MS) from other relapsing inflammatory autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system such as neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) is crucial in clinical practice. The differential diagnosis may be challenging but making the correct ultimate diagnosis is critical, since prognosis and treatments differ, and inappropriate therapy may promote disability. In the last two decades, significant advances have been made in MS, NMOSD, and MOGAD including new diagnostic criteria with better characterization of typical clinical symptoms and suggestive imaging (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) lesions. MRI is invaluable in making the ultimate diagnosis. An increasing amount of new evidence with respect to the specificity of observed lesions as well as the associated dynamic changes in the acute and follow-up phase in each condition has been reported in distinct studies recently published. Additionally, differences in brain (including the optic nerve) and spinal cord lesion patterns between MS, aquaporin4-antibody-positive NMOSD, and MOGAD have been described. We therefore present a narrative review on the most relevant findings in brain, spinal cord, and optic nerve lesions on conventional MRI for distinguishing adult patients with MS from NMOSD and MOGAD in clinical practice. In this context, cortical and central vein sign lesions, brain and spinal cord lesions characteristic of MS, NMOSD, and MOGAD, optic nerve involvement, role of MRI at follow-up, and new proposed diagnostic criteria to differentiate MS from NMOSD and MOGAD were discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Darin T Okuda
- Department of Neurology, Neuroinnovation Program, Multiple Sclerosis & Neuroimmunology Imaging Program, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Juan I Rojas
- Centro de esclerosis múltiple de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Claudia Chien
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Friedemman Paul
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ricardo Alonso
- Centro Universitario de Esclerosis Múltiple (CUEM), Hospital Ramos Mejía, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Carnero Contentti E, López PA, Criniti J, Pettinicchi JP, Cristiano E, Patrucco L, Bribiesca Contreras E, Gómez-Figueroa E, Flores-Rivera J, Correa-Díaz EP, Toral Granda AM, Ortiz Yepez MA, Gualotuña Pachacama WA, Piedra Andrade JS, Galleguillos L, Tkachuk V, Nadur D, Daccach Marques V, Soto de Castillo I, Casas M, Cohen L, Alonso R, Caride A, Lana-Peixoto M, Rojas JI. Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with optic neuritis related to NMOSD and MOGAD in distinct ethnic groups from Latin America. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2023; 72:104611. [PMID: 36907119 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.104611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Revised: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optic neuritis (ON) can be an initial manifestation of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) associated with aquaporin 4-antibody (AQP4-Ab) or myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody (MOG-Ab)-associated disease (MOGAD). Additionally, both diseases may have overlapping paraclinical and radiological features. These diseases may have different outcomes and prognoses. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes and prognostic features of patients with NMOSD and MOGAD presenting ON as first attack, from different ethnic groups in Latin America. METHODS We conducted a retrospective observational multicenter study in patients from Argentina (n = 61), Chile (n = 18), Ecuador (n = 27), Brazil (n = 30), Venezuela (n = 10) and Mexico (n = 49) with MOGAD or NMOSD related ON. Predictors of disability outcomes at last follow-up, namely visual disability (Visual Functional System Score ≥4), motor disability (permanent inability to walk further than 100 m unaided) and wheelchair dependence based on EDSS score were evaluated. RESULTS After a mean disease duration of 42.7 (±40.2) months in NMOSD and 19.7 (±23.6) in MOGAD, 55% and 22% (p>0.001) experienced permanent severe visual disability (visual acuity from 20/100 to 20/200), 22% and 6% (p = 0.01) permanent motor disability and 11% and 0% (p = 0.04) had become wheelchair dependent, respectively. Older age at disease onset was a predictor of severe visual disability (OR=1,03 CI95%1.01-1.05, p = 0.03); older age at disease onset (OR=1,04 CI95%1.01-1.07, p = 0.01), higher number of relapses (OR=1,32 CI95%1.02-1.71, p = 0.03) and rituximab treatment (OR=0,36 CI95%0.14-0.90, p = 0.02) were predictors of permanent motor disability, whereas ON associated with myelitis at disease onset was a predictor of wheelchair dependency (OR=4,16, CI95%1.23-14.08, p = 0,02) in NMOSD patients. No differences were found when evaluating distinct ethnic groups (Mixed vs. Caucasian vs. Afro-descendant) CONCLUSIONS: NMOSD was associated with poorer clinical outcomes than MOGAD. Ethnicity was not associated with prognostic factors. Distinct predictors of permanent visual and motor disability and wheelchair dependency in NMOSD patients were found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pablo A López
- Neuroimmunology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Hospital Alemán, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Juan Criniti
- Neuroimmunology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Hospital Alemán, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Juan Pablo Pettinicchi
- Neuroimmunology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Hospital Alemán, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Edgardo Cristiano
- Centro de Esclerosis Múltiple de Buenos Aires (CEMBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Liliana Patrucco
- Centro de Esclerosis Múltiple de Buenos Aires (CEMBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Enrique Gómez-Figueroa
- Division of Neurology, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - José Flores-Rivera
- Division of Neurology, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Verónica Tkachuk
- Neuroimmunology Section, Department of Neurology, Hospital de Clínicas "José de San Martín", Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Débora Nadur
- Neuroimmunology Section, Department of Neurology, Hospital de Clínicas "José de San Martín", Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Vanessa Daccach Marques
- Department of Neurosciences and Behavioral Sciences, Hospital das Clínicas, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ibis Soto de Castillo
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario de Maracaibo, Maracaibo, Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
| | - Magdalena Casas
- Neurology Department, Hospital J.M. Ramos Mejía, Faculty of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Leila Cohen
- Neurology Department, Hospital J.M. Ramos Mejía, Faculty of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Ricardo Alonso
- Neurology Department, Hospital J.M. Ramos Mejía, Faculty of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Alejandro Caride
- Neuroimmunology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Hospital Alemán, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Marco Lana-Peixoto
- Department of Neurology, Federal University of Minas Gerais Medical School, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Juan Ignacio Rojas
- Centro de Esclerosis Múltiple de Buenos Aires (CEMBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina; Service of Neurology, Hospital Universitario de CEMIC, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Carnero Contentti E, López PA, Criniti J, Alonso R, Silva B, Luetic G, Correa-Díaz EP, Galleguillos L, Navas C, Soto de Castillo I, Hamuy FDDB, Gracia F, Tkachuk V, Weinshenker BG, Rojas JI. Frequency of NMOSD misdiagnosis in a cohort from Latin America: Impact and evaluation of different contributors. Mult Scler 2023; 29:277-286. [PMID: 36453614 DOI: 10.1177/13524585221136259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) misdiagnosis (i.e. the incorrect diagnosis of patients who truly have NMOSD) remains an issue in clinical practice. We determined the frequency and factors associated with NMOSD misdiagnosis in patients evaluated in a cohort from Latin America. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with NMOSD, according to the 2015 diagnostic criteria, from referral clinics in six Latin American countries (Argentina, Chile, Paraguay, Colombia, Ecuador, and Venezuela). Diagnoses prior to NMOSD and ultimate diagnoses, demographic, clinical and paraclinical data, and treatment schemes were evaluated. RESULTS A total of 469 patients presented with an established diagnosis of NMOSD (73.2% seropositive) and after evaluation, we determined that 56 (12%) patients had been initially misdiagnosed with a disease other than NMOSD. The most frequent alternative diagnoses were multiple sclerosis (MS; 66.1%), clinically isolated syndrome (17.9%), and cerebrovascular disease (3.6%). NMOSD misdiagnosis was determined by MS/NMOSD specialists in 33.9% of cases. An atypical MS syndrome was found in 86% of misdiagnosed patients, 50% had NMOSD red flags in brain and/or spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and 71.5% were prescribed disease-modifying drugs. CONCLUSIONS NMOSD misdiagnosis is relatively frequent in Latin America (12%). Misapplication and misinterpretation of clinical and neuroradiological findings are relevant factors associated with misdiagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pablo A López
- Neuroimmunology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Hospital Alemán, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Juan Criniti
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Alemán, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Ricardo Alonso
- Neurology Department, Hospital J.M. Ramos Mejía, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Berenice Silva
- Neurology Department, Hospital J.M. Ramos Mejía, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina/Sección Enfermedades Desmielinizantes, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | - Lorna Galleguillos
- Clínica Alemana de Santiago, Santiago, Chile; Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile
| | - Carlos Navas
- Clínica Enfermedad Desmielinizante, Clinica Universitaria Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | | | - Fernando Gracia
- Hospital Santo Tomas, Universidad Interamericana de Panamá, Panama City, Panamá
| | - Verónica Tkachuk
- Neuroimmunology Section, Department of Neurology, Hospital de Clínicas "José de San Martín," Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Juan Ignacio Rojas
- Centro de Esclerosis Múltiple de Buenos Aires (CEMBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sechi E, Cacciaguerra L, Chen JJ, Mariotto S, Fadda G, Dinoto A, Lopez-Chiriboga AS, Pittock SJ, Flanagan EP. Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody-Associated Disease (MOGAD): A Review of Clinical and MRI Features, Diagnosis, and Management. Front Neurol 2022; 13:885218. [PMID: 35785363 PMCID: PMC9247462 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.885218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 143] [Impact Index Per Article: 47.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) is the most recently defined inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS). Over the last decade, several studies have helped delineate the characteristic clinical-MRI phenotypes of the disease, allowing distinction from aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-IgG-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (AQP4-IgG+NMOSD) and multiple sclerosis (MS). The clinical manifestations of MOGAD are heterogeneous, ranging from isolated optic neuritis or myelitis to multifocal CNS demyelination often in the form of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), or cortical encephalitis. A relapsing course is observed in approximately 50% of patients. Characteristic MRI features have been described that increase the diagnostic suspicion (e.g., perineural optic nerve enhancement, spinal cord H-sign, T2-lesion resolution over time) and help discriminate from MS and AQP4+NMOSD, despite some overlap. The detection of MOG-IgG in the serum (and sometimes CSF) confirms the diagnosis in patients with compatible clinical-MRI phenotypes, but false positive results are occasionally encountered, especially with indiscriminate testing of large unselected populations. The type of cell-based assay used to evaluate for MOG-IgG (fixed vs. live) and antibody end-titer (low vs. high) can influence the likelihood of MOGAD diagnosis. International consensus diagnostic criteria for MOGAD are currently being compiled and will assist in clinical diagnosis and be useful for enrolment in clinical trials. Although randomized controlled trials are lacking, MOGAD acute attacks appear to be very responsive to high dose steroids and plasma exchange may be considered in refractory cases. Attack-prevention treatments also lack class-I data and empiric maintenance treatment is generally reserved for relapsing cases or patients with severe residual disability after the presenting attack. A variety of empiric steroid-sparing immunosuppressants can be considered and may be efficacious based on retrospective or prospective observational studies but prospective randomized placebo-controlled trials are needed to better guide treatment. In summary, this article will review our rapidly evolving understanding of MOGAD diagnosis and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elia Sechi
- Neurology Unit, Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Laura Cacciaguerra
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Neurology and Center for Multiple Sclerosis and Autoimmune Neurology Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - John J. Chen
- Department of Neurology and Center for Multiple Sclerosis and Autoimmune Neurology Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Sara Mariotto
- Neurology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Giulia Fadda
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Alessandro Dinoto
- Neurology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Sean J. Pittock
- Department of Neurology and Center for Multiple Sclerosis and Autoimmune Neurology Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Eoin P. Flanagan
- Department of Neurology and Center for Multiple Sclerosis and Autoimmune Neurology Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- *Correspondence: Eoin P. Flanagan
| |
Collapse
|