Complex genetic interactions between DNA polymerase β and the NHEJ ligase

Redox regulation: mechanisms, biology and therapeutic targets in diseases

Redox signaling acts as a critical mediator in the dynamic interactions between organisms and their external environment, profoundly influencing both the onset and progression of various diseases. Under physiological conditions, oxidative free radicals generated by the mitochondrial oxidative respiratory chain, endoplasmic reticulum, and NADPH oxidases can be effectively neutralized by NRF2-mediated antioxidant responses. These responses elevate the synthesis of superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, as well as key molecules like nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) and glutathione (GSH), thereby maintaining cellular redox homeostasis. Disruption of this finely tuned equilibrium is closely linked to the pathogenesis of a wide range of diseases. Recent advances have broadened our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underpinning this dysregulation, highlighting the pivotal roles of genomic instability, epigenetic modifications, protein degradation, and metabolic reprogramming. These findings provide a foundation for exploring redox regulation as a mechanistic basis for improving therapeutic strategies. While antioxidant-based therapies have shown early promise in conditions where oxidative stress plays a primary pathological role, their efficacy in diseases characterized by complex, multifactorial etiologies remains controversial. A deeper, context-specific understanding of redox signaling, particularly the roles of redox-sensitive proteins, is critical for designing targeted therapies aimed at re-establishing redox balance. Emerging small molecule inhibitors that target specific cysteine residues in redox-sensitive proteins have demonstrated promising preclinical outcomes, setting the stage for forthcoming clinical trials. In this review, we summarize our current understanding of the intricate relationship between oxidative stress and disease pathogenesis and also discuss how these insights can be leveraged to optimize therapeutic strategies in clinical practice.

Quercetin exhibits cytotoxicity in cancer cells by inducing two-ended DNA double-strand breaks

Quercetin, a flavonoid, is involved in the induction of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), in addition to its antioxidant properties. Although DNA topoisomerase II (Top2) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been suggested as possible mechanisms through which quercetin induces DSBs, the exact mechanism remains unclear. In this study, we examined the mechanism of DSB induction by quercetin and its repair using HeLa cells and gene-knockout cell lines generated from human Nalm-6 cells. Immunofluorescence staining for γH2AX, a DSB marker, and analysis of the frequency of random integration of foreign DNA, which correlates with the number of DSBs and DSB repair pathways, indicated that quercetin induces DSBs in a concentration-dependent manner. The sensitivity assay suggested that the factor involved in quercetin-induced DSBs was not Top2. However, ROS was found to accumulate transiently in quercetin-treated HeLa cells. Furthermore, the addition of ascorbic acid increased the survival of quercetin-treated HeLa cells, suggesting that quercetin induces a transient accumulation of ROS, which in turn induces DSBs. The resulting DSBs were repaired primarily by non-homologous end-joining and homologous recombination, similar to X-ray-induced DSBs. Taken together, quercetin, used as a radiomimetic agent, has the potential to produce effects equivalent to those of an X ray-dose at a relatively low risk.

A Cell System-Assisted Strategy for Evaluating the Natural Antioxidant-Induced Double-Stranded DNA Break (DSB) Style

Natural antioxidants derived from plants exert various physiological effects, including antitumor effects. However, the molecular mechanisms of each natural antioxidant have not yet been fully elucidated. Identifying the targets of natural antioxidants with antitumor properties in vitro is costly and time-consuming, and the results thus obtained may not reliably reflect in vivo conditions. Therefore, to enhance understanding regarding the antitumor effects of natural antioxidants, we focused on DNA, one of the targets of anticancer drugs, and evaluated whether antioxidants, e.g., sulforaphane, resveratrol, quercetin, kaempferol, and genistein, which exert antitumor effects, induce DNA damage using gene-knockout cell lines derived from human Nalm-6 and HeLa cells pretreated with the DNA-dependent protein kinase inhibitor NU7026. Our results suggested that sulforaphane induces single-strand breaks or DNA strand crosslinks and that quercetin induces double-strand breaks. In contrast, resveratrol showed the ability to exert cytotoxic effects other than DNA damage. Our results also suggested that kaempferol and genistein induce DNA damage via unknown mechanisms. Taken together, the use of this evaluation system facilitates the analysis of the cytotoxic mechanisms of natural antioxidants.

The base excision repair process: comparison between higher and lower eukaryotes

The base excision repair (BER) pathway is essential for maintaining the stability of DNA in all organisms and defects in this process are associated with life-threatening diseases. It is involved in removing specific types of DNA lesions that are induced by both exogenous and endogenous genotoxic substances. BER is a multi-step mechanism that is often initiated by the removal of a damaged base leading to a genotoxic intermediate that is further processed before the reinsertion of the correct nucleotide and the restoration of the genome to a stable structure. Studies in human and yeast cells, as well as fruit fly and nematode worms, have played important roles in identifying the components of this conserved DNA repair pathway that maintains the integrity of the eukaryotic genome. This review will focus on the components of base excision repair, namely, the DNA glycosylases, the apurinic/apyrimidinic endonucleases, the DNA polymerase, and the ligases, as well as other protein cofactors. Functional insights into these conserved proteins will be provided from humans, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Drosophila melanogaster, and Caenorhabditis elegans, and the implications of genetic polymorphisms and knockouts of the corresponding genes.

Biological Adaptations of Tumor Cells to Radiation Therapy

Radiation therapy has been used worldwide for many decades as a therapeutic regimen for the treatment of different types of cancer. Just over 50% of cancer patients are treated with radiotherapy alone or with other types of antitumor therapy. Radiation can induce different types of cell damage: directly, it can induce DNA single- and double-strand breaks; indirectly, it can induce the formation of free radicals, which can interact with different components of cells, including the genome, promoting structural alterations. During treatment, radiosensitive tumor cells decrease their rate of cell proliferation through cell cycle arrest stimulated by DNA damage. Then, DNA repair mechanisms are turned on to alleviate the damage, but cell death mechanisms are activated if damage persists and cannot be repaired. Interestingly, some cells can evade apoptosis because genome damage triggers the cellular overactivation of some DNA repair pathways. Additionally, some surviving cells exposed to radiation may have alterations in the expression of tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes, enhancing different hallmarks of cancer, such as migration, invasion, and metastasis. The activation of these genetic pathways and other epigenetic and structural cellular changes in the irradiated cells and extracellular factors, such as the tumor microenvironment, is crucial in developing tumor radioresistance. The tumor microenvironment is largely responsible for the poor efficacy of antitumor therapy, tumor relapse, and poor prognosis observed in some patients. In this review, we describe strategies that tumor cells use to respond to radiation stress, adapt, and proliferate after radiotherapy, promoting the appearance of tumor radioresistance. Also, we discuss the clinical impact of radioresistance in patient outcomes. Knowledge of such cellular strategies could help the development of new clinical interventions, increasing the radiosensitization of tumor cells, improving the effectiveness of these therapies, and increasing the survival of patients.