1
|
van Elden S, Fasca H, Meeuwig JJ. Conservation implications of dominant species associated with ocean infrastructure: The genus Tubastraea (Dendrophyllidae). MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN 2025; 214:117789. [PMID: 40058322 DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.117789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2024] [Revised: 03/03/2025] [Accepted: 03/04/2025] [Indexed: 04/02/2025]
Abstract
More than 28,000 fixed structures are found throughout the world's continental shelf waters. This infrastructure can have significant ecological value but can also facilitate dominant invasive species. One such taxon is Tubastraea (Dendrophyllidae), several species of which are found throughout the Indian and Pacific Oceans and have invaded the Atlantic Ocean, where their impacts are well-studied. High abundances of Tubastraea on ocean infrastructure have been documented in their native range, particularly in Australia, where we argue Tubastraea should be classified as native dominant invaders. It is critical that we gain a better understanding of the ecological role played by Tubastraea, as this may have significant implications for the decommissioning of ocean infrastructure in both the non-native and native ranges of these species. Countries where Tubastraea are native should be alert to these dominant invasive species, and consider how new habitats such as ocean infrastructure can facilitate native invasions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S van Elden
- Marine Futures Lab, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia; The UWA Oceans Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia.
| | - H Fasca
- Laboratory of Advanced Production Management Systems, Alberto Luiz Coimbra Institute for Graduate Studies and Research in Engineering, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Cidade Universitária, COPPE, RJ, Brazil
| | - J J Meeuwig
- Marine Futures Lab, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia; The UWA Oceans Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schramm KD, Marshall BT, Oliver P, Elsdon TS, Marnane MJ, Saunders BJ, Rouphael AB, Harvey ES. Assessing fish assemblages on oil jackets off the Angolan coast: Implications for decommissioning decisions. MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 2025; 207:107011. [PMID: 40054425 DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2025.107011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2024] [Revised: 02/07/2025] [Accepted: 02/10/2025] [Indexed: 04/01/2025]
Abstract
West Africa plays a significant role in global oil production. Much of the offshore infrastructure in this region is due for decommissioning. An understanding of the marine communities associated with the infrastructure is essential to predict the outcome of different decommissioning alternatives, such as leave-in-place or full removal. Using ROV inspection footage, we sampled nine jackets off Angola (Cabinda Province) to quantify the abundance and species composition of fish. Sixty-five species of fish were observed among jackets, including several taxa that are commercially important to the region, such as sardine (Sardinella spp.) and mackerel species (Trachurus spp.). We also observed taxa that are commonly targeted in small-scale (artisanal) fisheries in Angola, such as groupers (Epinephelidae) and snappers (Lutjanidae). Distinct fish assemblages were observed at each jacket, and attributed to differences in jacket location, depth, and infrastructure design. Time of day also affected the assemblage detected across jackets, although similar dominant families were present across day and night at a specific depth zone when pooled. Unlike patterns observed in other regions, there was not a clear depth zonation pattern at individual jackets, and only a weak depth zonation pattern was evident when all jackets were combined. Six species had not previously been recorded off Angola, suggesting that the jackets may either facilitate range extensions or highlight a paucity of fish studies in the region. Our results have important implications for evaluating decommissioning options, including addressing questions on jacket removal or reefing and implications for species of importance to fisheries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karl D Schramm
- School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia.
| | - Brooke T Marshall
- School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Peter Oliver
- Chevron Britain Ltd., Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Travis S Elsdon
- School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia; Chevron Energy Technology Pty. Ltd., Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Michael J Marnane
- School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia; Chevron Energy Technology Pty. Ltd., Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Benjamin J Saunders
- School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Anthony B Rouphael
- School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Euan S Harvey
- School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Haney J, Rochman CM. Plastic pollution has the potential to alter ecological and evolutionary processes in aquatic ecosystems. Nat Ecol Evol 2025; 9:762-768. [PMID: 40295774 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-025-02678-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/17/2025] [Indexed: 04/30/2025]
Abstract
We are beginning to understand the ecotoxicological effects of plastic pollution at the suborganismal, individual, population and community levels, but research has only just begun to explore the ecological and evolutionary impacts of plastic as a new habitat. The global introduction of plastic waste into aquatic environments introduces diverse and variable habitat modifications, altering ecosystems and potentially forming new ecological niches. This widespread habitat modification spans several aquatic ecosystems, including the pelagic ocean, deep-sea benthos, lakes and rivers. Recent studies suggest that habitat modification may interact with and alter ecological and evolutionary processes, affecting populations, communities and species, for example, through feeding ecology, mating behaviour and dispersal. However, further research is necessary to understand the potential long-term effects of plastic pollution on ecological and evolutionary processes across global aquatic ecosystems. Here, we review this emerging field of research and its trajectory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Haney
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chelsea M Rochman
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Noshchenko O, Hagspiel V, Deshpande PC. Assessing the sustainability of offshore platform power supply alternatives using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA): A case study of Norway. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2025; 973:179053. [PMID: 40120408 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2024] [Revised: 02/18/2025] [Accepted: 03/03/2025] [Indexed: 03/25/2025]
Abstract
This study uses multi-criteria decision analysis to address the sustainability assessment of power supply alternatives for offshore platforms on the Norwegian Continental Shelf. In response to Norway's decarbonization goals, three power supply alternatives are assessed across environmental, economic, and social dimensions. The alternatives include the usage of gas turbines, power from shore electrification, and connection to floating offshore wind farms. Stakeholder surveys contributed to the weighting of criteria within the Triple Bottom Line framework, prioritizing factors such as greenhouse gas emissions, investment costs, and working safety. Our analysis identifies power from shore as the most favourable alternative from a sustainability perspective, though it faces limitations due to platform location and potential strain on onshore power systems. While offshore wind farms offer environmental benefits, their high cost and impact on marine ecosystems present challenges for large-scale deployment. Sensitivity analysis confirms the dominance of the power-from-shore alternative but highlights scenarios where gas turbines could become favourable if economic considerations are heavily weighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Noshchenko
- Department of Industrial Economics and Technology Management, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway.
| | - Verena Hagspiel
- Department of Industrial Economics and Technology Management, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
| | - Paritosh C Deshpande
- Department of Industrial Economics and Technology Management, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dannheim J, Kloss P, Vanaverbeke J, Mavraki N, Zupan M, Spielmann V, Degraer S, Birchenough SNR, Janas U, Sheehan E, Teschke K, Gill AB, Hutchison Z, Carey DA, Rasser M, Buyse J, van der Weide B, Bittner O, Causon P, Krone R, Faasse M, Wrede A, Coolen JWP. Biodiversity Information of benthic Species at ARtificial structures - BISAR. Sci Data 2025; 12:604. [PMID: 40210637 PMCID: PMC11985901 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-025-04920-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2025] [Indexed: 04/12/2025] Open
Abstract
Understanding the effects of artificial structures in marine landscapes is required for ecosystem-based management. Global demand for oil and gas and accelerated commitments to renewable energy development has led to the proliferation of marine artificial structures. Investigating the cumulative effects of these structures on marine ecosystems requires data on the benthic community over large geographical and long-time scales. It is imperative to share the data collected by many stakeholders in an integrated information system to benefit science, industry and policy. BISAR is the first data product containing harmonised and quality-checked international data on benthos from artificial structures in the North Sea. BISAR was compiled from environmental impact assessment studies and scientific projects (3864 samples, 890 taxa). Data derive from 34 artificial structures and surrounding soft sediments (years: 2003 to 2019). Structures include offshore wind turbines, oil and gas platforms and a research platform. Data from a geogenic reef, allow comparison of natural and artificial reef communities. We aim to host future BISAR data dynamically in the CRITTERBASE web portal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Dannheim
- Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Am Handelshafen 12, 27570, Bremerhaven, Germany.
| | - Paul Kloss
- Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Am Handelshafen 12, 27570, Bremerhaven, Germany
- Helmholtz Institute for Functional Marine Biodiversity at the University of Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstraße 231, 26129, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Jan Vanaverbeke
- Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Operational Directorate Natural Environment (OD Nature), Marine Ecology and Management (MARECO), Vautierstraat 29, Brussels, B-1000, Belgium
| | - Ninon Mavraki
- Wageningen Marine Research, Ankerpark 27, 1781, AG, Den Helder, The Netherlands
| | - Mirta Zupan
- Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Operational Directorate Natural Environment (OD Nature), Marine Ecology and Management (MARECO), Vautierstraat 29, Brussels, B-1000, Belgium
- Marine Biology Research Group, Department of Biology, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281-S8, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Steven Degraer
- Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Operational Directorate Natural Environment (OD Nature), Marine Ecology and Management (MARECO), Vautierstraat 29, Brussels, B-1000, Belgium
| | - Silvana N R Birchenough
- The Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, NR33 0HT, United Kingdom
- Environmental Resources Management (ERM) Ltd, 8 Thorpe Road, Norwich, NR1 1RY, United Kingdom
| | - Urszula Janas
- Department of Marine Ecology, Faculty of Oceanography and Geography, University of Gdansk, Al. Marsz. J. Pilsudskiego 46, Gdynia, 81-378, Poland
| | - Emma Sheehan
- School of Biological and Marine Sciences (Faculty of Science and Engineering), University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Katharina Teschke
- Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Am Handelshafen 12, 27570, Bremerhaven, Germany
- Helmholtz Institute for Functional Marine Biodiversity at the University of Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstraße 231, 26129, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Andrew B Gill
- The Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, NR33 0HT, United Kingdom
| | - Zoe Hutchison
- University of St Andrews, School of Biology, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Drew A Carey
- INSPIRE Environmental, Newport, Rhode Island, 02840, US
| | - Michael Rasser
- Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Sterling, VA, 22066, US
| | - Jolien Buyse
- Marine Biology Research Group, Department of Biology, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281-S8, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
- Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, ILVO Marine Research, Jacobsenstraat 1, 8400, Ostend, Belgium
| | | | - Oliver Bittner
- Wageningen Marine Research, Ankerpark 27, 1781, AG, Den Helder, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Causon
- NIRAS (Group) UK, Kings Ride Court, Kings Ride, Ascot, SL5 7JR, UK
| | - Roland Krone
- Reefauna, Schleusenstraße 3, 27568, Bremerhaven, Germany
| | - Marco Faasse
- Eurofins Aquasense, Korringaweg 7, 4401 NT, Yerseke, The Netherlands
| | - Alexa Wrede
- Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Am Handelshafen 12, 27570, Bremerhaven, Germany
- Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Biologische Anstalt Helgoland, Shelf Sea System Ecology, 27498, Helgoland, Germany
| | - Joop W P Coolen
- Wageningen Marine Research, Ankerpark 27, 1781, AG, Den Helder, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sobol JC, Pastor Rollan A, Galaiduk R, Treml EA. The role and impact of oil and gas structures on the connectivity and metapopulation dynamics of tropical reef species. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN 2024; 209:117144. [PMID: 39476633 DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.117144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2024] [Revised: 10/10/2024] [Accepted: 10/11/2024] [Indexed: 11/28/2024]
Abstract
Offshore oil and gas (O&G) structures exist in nearshore and offshore marine environments globally, yet our understanding of their ecological implications is poorly understood, especially when it comes to decommissioning these structures at the end of life. Specifically, the influence of these structures on dispersal-based connectivity and population persistence of associated species has yet to be quantified. In this study, we provide insights into the ecological implications of O&G structures on the North West Shelf (NWS) of Western Australia. Specifically, we examine their impact on local and regional population connectivity patterns and metapopulation dynamics for two fish species and a coral. By integrating biophysical modeling, network analysis and metapopulation models, we estimate the contribution and impact of both O&G structures and natural reef systems in this complex seascape. Our findings indicate that collectively the reefs in this system contribute as the main sources of larval export and O&G structures contribute as destinations, with a higher import of larvae. These structures could also act as local stepping-stones, enhancing the ecological connectivity among reef subpopulations. Overall, O&G platforms and wells, as included in the model, do not have a significant impact on regional metapopulation dynamics for the reef species explored in this study. Knowledge gained from this research will inform regional spatial planning for decommissioning offshore infrastructure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia C Sobol
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Centre for Marine Science, Deakin University, Geelong, Vic. 3220, Australia
| | - Ane Pastor Rollan
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Centre for Marine Science, Deakin University, Geelong, Vic. 3220, Australia
| | - Ronen Galaiduk
- Australian Institute of Marine Science, Indian Ocean Marine Research Centre (IOMRC), Perth, WA, Australia; Oceans Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Eric A Treml
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Centre for Marine Science, Deakin University, Geelong, Vic. 3220, Australia; Australian Institute of Marine Science, Indian Ocean Marine Research Centre (IOMRC), Perth, WA, Australia; Oceans Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Uribe-Martínez A, Espinoza-Tenorio A, Cruz-Pech JB, Cupido-Santamaría DG, Trujillo-Córdova JA, García-Nava H, Flores-Vidal X, Gudiño-Elizondo N, Herguera JC, Appendini CM, Cuevas E. An affordable operational oil spill monitoring system in action: A diachronic multiplatform analysis of recent incidents in the southern Gulf of Mexico. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT 2024; 196:1069. [PMID: 39419911 PMCID: PMC11486827 DOI: 10.1007/s10661-024-13161-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 09/24/2024] [Indexed: 10/19/2024]
Abstract
The coexistence of marine sensitive areas with the oil industry requires robust preparedness and rapid response capabilities for monitoring and mitigating oil spill events. Scientifically proven satellite-based methods for the visual detection of oil spills are widely recognized as effective, low-cost, transferable, scalable, and operational solutions, particularly in developing economies. Following meticulous design and implementation, we adopted and executed a relatively low-cost operational monitoring and alert system for oil spill detection over the ocean surface and alert issuance. We analyzed over 1500 satellite images, issuing over 70 warning reports on oil slicks and spills in the southern Gulf of Mexico. To assess the system's efficiency and performance, we leveraged data from three major oil spill incidents in the study region during June and July of 2023 in the study region, covering a maximum area of 669 km2 and tracked for 12 to 24 days. We documented the evolution of these oil spills by integrating satellite sensing data with on-site Lagrangian drifting buoys, a network of high-frequency radars, and citizen reports to validate the outcomes of this system. We generated timely technical information on the spill's evolution, informing decision-makers and local community leaders to strengthen their mitigation response capabilities. Additionally, we developed a robust database with spectral and spatiotemporal features of satellite-detected oil, thereby contributing to advancing the scientific understanding of sea surface dynamics related to natural and anthropogenic oil sources. This study also highlights immediate-, medium-, and long-term research agendas and establishes a reference for a sustained, transferable, and operational oil spill monitoring system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail Uribe-Martínez
- Coastal Processes and Engineering Laboratory, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Engineering Institute, Sisal, Yucatán, México.
- Operational Oceanography Group, Oceanological Research Institute of the Autonomous University of Baja California (UABC), Ensenada, Baja California, México.
| | - Alejandro Espinoza-Tenorio
- Department of Sustainability Sciences, El Colegio de La Frontera Sur, Campeche (ECOSUR), San Francisco de Campeche, Campeche, México
| | - Johnny Bryan Cruz-Pech
- Department of Sustainability Sciences, El Colegio de La Frontera Sur, Campeche (ECOSUR), San Francisco de Campeche, Campeche, México
| | - Deysi Guadalupe Cupido-Santamaría
- Department of Sustainability Sciences, El Colegio de La Frontera Sur, Campeche (ECOSUR), San Francisco de Campeche, Campeche, México
| | - Jorge Alfredo Trujillo-Córdova
- Department of Sustainability Sciences, El Colegio de La Frontera Sur, Campeche (ECOSUR), San Francisco de Campeche, Campeche, México
| | - Héctor García-Nava
- Littoral Process Group, Oceanological Research Institute of the Autonomous University of Baja California (UABC), Ensenada, Baja California, México
| | - Xavier Flores-Vidal
- Operational Oceanography Group, Oceanological Research Institute of the Autonomous University of Baja California (UABC), Ensenada, Baja California, México
| | - Napoleón Gudiño-Elizondo
- Operational Oceanography Group, Oceanological Research Institute of the Autonomous University of Baja California (UABC), Ensenada, Baja California, México
| | - Juan Carlos Herguera
- Marine Ecology, Oceanology Division, Center for Scientific Research and Higher Education at Ensenada (CICESE), Ensenada, Baja California, México
| | - Christian Mario Appendini
- Coastal Processes and Engineering Laboratory, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Engineering Institute, Sisal, Yucatán, México
| | - Eduardo Cuevas
- Operational Oceanography Group, Oceanological Research Institute of the Autonomous University of Baja California (UABC), Ensenada, Baja California, México.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Stranddorf L, Colley T, Delefosse M, Svendsen JC, Irving Olsen S. Marine biodiversity impact pathways for offshore wind farm decommissioning: Implications for Life Cycle impact assessment development. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS 2024; 167:112613. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2025]
|
9
|
Galaiduk R, McLean DL, Speed CW, Greer D, McIntosh R, Treml EA. Offshore oil and gas infrastructure plays a minor role in marine metapopulation dynamics. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2024; 934:172981. [PMID: 38705301 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Revised: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
Decommissioning consequences of offshore oil and gas infrastructure removal on marine population dynamics, including connectivity, are not well understood. We modelled the connectivity and metapopulation dynamics of three fish and two benthic invertebrate species inhabiting the natural rocky reefs and offshore oil and gas infrastructure located in the Bass Strait, south-east Australia. Using a network approach, we found that platforms are not major sources, destinations, or stepping-stones for most species, yet act as modest sources for connectivity of Corynactis australis (jewel anemone). In contrast, sections of subsea pipelines appear to act as stepping-stones, source and destination habitats of varying strengths for all study species, except for Centrostephanus rodgersii (long-spined sea urchin). Natural reefs were the main stepping-stones, local source, and destination habitats for all study species. These reefs were largely responsible for the overall metapopulation growth of all study species (average of 96 % contribution across all species), with infrastructure acting as a minor contributor (<2 % average contribution). Full or partial decommissioning of platforms should have a very low or negligible impact on the overall metapopulation dynamics of the species explored, except C. australis, while full removal of pipelines could have a low impact on the metapopulation dynamics of benthic invertebrate species and a moderate impact on fish species (up to 34.1 % reduction in the metapopulation growth). We recommend that the decision to remove offshore infrastructure, either in full or in-part, be made on a platform-by-platform basis and consider contributions of pipelines to connectivity and metapopulation dynamics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronen Galaiduk
- Australian Institute of Marine Science, Indian Ocean Marine Research Centre (IOMRC), Perth, WA, Australia; Oceans Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
| | - Dianne L McLean
- Australian Institute of Marine Science, Indian Ocean Marine Research Centre (IOMRC), Perth, WA, Australia; Oceans Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Conrad W Speed
- Australian Institute of Marine Science, Indian Ocean Marine Research Centre (IOMRC), Perth, WA, Australia; Oceans Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | | | | | - Eric A Treml
- Australian Institute of Marine Science, Indian Ocean Marine Research Centre (IOMRC), Perth, WA, Australia; Oceans Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Barry PJ, Silburn B, Bakir A, Russell J, Tidbury HJ. Seafloor macrolitter as a settling platform for non-native species: A case study from UK waters. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN 2024; 204:116499. [PMID: 38796991 DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.116499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Revised: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
Marine litter is increasingly recognised as a vector for the spread of non-native species (NNS). However, our understanding of its role in the propagation of NNS in UK waters remains limited. As part of the Clean Seas Environmental Monitoring Programme, we opportunistically analysed seafloor macrolitter items trawled from various locations around the coast of England and Wales and examined each for the presence of NNS. Of the 41 litter items analysed, we identified a total of 133 taxa, including two non-native and four cryptogenic species. This confirms that NNS are settling on seafloor macrolitter in UK waters and that these can be detected using morphological taxonomic analysis. Furthermore, we propose a methodology to classify litter based on size, rugosity and polymer/material type to explore whether there were detectable patterns governing community composition and litter characteristics. This exploratory investigation provides evidence to inform future risk assessments of NNS vectors and pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P J Barry
- Centre for Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft NR33 0HT, United Kingdom.
| | - B Silburn
- Centre for Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft NR33 0HT, United Kingdom.
| | - A Bakir
- Centre for Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft NR33 0HT, United Kingdom.
| | - J Russell
- Centre for Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft NR33 0HT, United Kingdom.
| | - H J Tidbury
- Centre for Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Barrack Road, Weymouth DT4 8UB, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bray JP, Hewitt CLR, Hulme PE. Bridging aquatic invasive species threats across multiple sectors through One Biosecurity. Bioscience 2024; 74:440-449. [PMID: 39156613 PMCID: PMC11328144 DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biae049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/05/2024] [Indexed: 08/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Understanding the magnitude of biosecurity risks in aquatic environments is increasingly complex and urgent because increasing volumes of international shipping, rising demand for aquaculture products, and growth in the global aquarium trade, are accelerating invasive alien species spread worldwide. These threats are especially pressing amid climate and biodiversity crises. However, global and national biosecurity systems are poorly prepared to respond because of fragmented research and policy environments, that often fail to account for risks across sectors or across stakeholder needs and fail to recognize similarities in the processes underpinning biological invasions. In the present article, we illustrate the complex network of links between biosecurity threats across human, animal, plant, and environment sectors and propose a universal approach to risk assessment. One Biosecurity is a holistic, interdisciplinary approach that minimizes biosecurity risks across human, animal, plant, algal, and ecosystem health and is critical to reduce redundancy and increase cross-sectoral cohesion to improve policy, management, and research in aquatic biosecurity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Peter Bray
- The Centre for One Biosecurity Research, Analysis and Synthesis
- Department of Pest-Management and Conservation at Lincoln University, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand
| | | | - Philip Eric Hulme
- The Centre for One Biosecurity Research, Analysis and Synthesis
- Department of Pest-Management and Conservation at Lincoln University, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
James K, Macreadie PI, Burdett HL, Davies I, Kamenos NA. It's time to broaden what we consider a 'blue carbon ecosystem'. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY 2024; 30:e17261. [PMID: 38712641 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.17261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Revised: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
Photoautotrophic marine ecosystems can lock up organic carbon in their biomass and the associated organic sediments they trap over millennia and are thus regarded as blue carbon ecosystems. Because of the ability of marine ecosystems to lock up organic carbon for millennia, blue carbon is receiving much attention within the United Nations' 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development as a nature-based solution (NBS) to climate change, but classically still focuses on seagrass meadows, mangrove forests, and tidal marshes. However, other coastal ecosystems could also be important for blue carbon storage, but remain largely neglected in both carbon cycling budgets and NBS strategic planning. Using a meta-analysis of 253 research publications, we identify other coastal ecosystems-including mud flats, fjords, coralline algal (rhodolith) beds, and some components or coral reef systems-with a strong capacity to act as blue carbon sinks in certain situations. Features that promote blue carbon burial within these 'non-classical' blue carbon ecosystems included: (1) balancing of carbon release by calcification via carbon uptake at the individual and ecosystem levels; (2) high rates of allochthonous organic carbon supply because of high particle trapping capacity; (3) high rates of carbon preservation and low remineralization rates; and (4) location in depositional environments. Some of these features are context-dependent, meaning that these ecosystems were blue carbon sinks in some locations, but not others. Therefore, we provide a universal framework that can evaluate the likelihood of a given ecosystem to behave as a blue carbon sink for a given context. Overall, this paper seeks to encourage consideration of non-classical blue carbon ecosystems within NBS strategies, allowing more complete blue carbon accounting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter I Macreadie
- Marine Research and Innovation Centre, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
| | - Heidi L Burdett
- Umeå Marine Sciences Centre, Umeå University, Norrbyn, Sweden
- Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | | | - Nicholas A Kamenos
- Umeå Marine Sciences Centre, Umeå University, Norrbyn, Sweden
- Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Knights AM, Lemasson AJ, Firth LB, Bond T, Claisse J, Coolen JWP, Copping A, Dannheim J, De Dominicis M, Degraer S, Elliott M, Fernandes PG, Fowler AM, Frost M, Henry LA, Hicks N, Hyder K, Jagerroos S, Jones DOB, Love M, Lynam CP, Macreadie PI, Marlow J, Mavraki N, McLean D, Montagna PA, Paterson DM, Perrow M, Porter J, Russell DJF, Bull AS, Schratzberger M, Shipley B, van Elden S, Vanaverbeke J, Want A, Watson SCL, Wilding TA, Somerfield P. Developing expert scientific consensus on the environmental and societal effects of marine artificial structures prior to decommissioning. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2024; 352:119897. [PMID: 38184869 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
Thousands of artificial ('human-made') structures are present in the marine environment, many at or approaching end-of-life and requiring urgent decisions regarding their decommissioning. No consensus has been reached on which decommissioning option(s) result in optimal environmental and societal outcomes, in part, owing to a paucity of evidence from real-world decommissioning case studies. To address this significant challenge, we asked a worldwide panel of scientists to provide their expert opinion. They were asked to identify and characterise the ecosystem effects of artificial structures in the sea, their causes and consequences, and to identify which, if any, should be retained following decommissioning. Experts considered that most of the pressures driving ecological and societal effects from marine artificial structures (MAS) were of medium severity, occur frequently, and are dependent on spatial scale with local-scale effects of greater magnitude than regional effects. The duration of many effects following decommissioning were considered to be relatively short, in the order of days. Overall, environmental effects of structures were considered marginally undesirable, while societal effects marginally desirable. Experts therefore indicated that any decision to leave MAS in place at end-of-life to be more beneficial to society than the natural environment. However, some individual environmental effects were considered desirable and worthy of retention, especially in certain geographic locations, where structures can support improved trophic linkages, increases in tourism, habitat provision, and population size, and provide stability in population dynamics. The expert analysis consensus that the effects of MAS are both negative and positive for the environment and society, gives no strong support for policy change whether removal or retention is favoured until further empirical evidence is available to justify change to the status quo. The combination of desirable and undesirable effects associated with MAS present a significant challenge for policy- and decision-makers in their justification to implement decommissioning options. Decisions may need to be decided on a case-by-case basis accounting for the trade-off in costs and benefits at a local level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antony M Knights
- University of Plymouth, School of Biological and Marine Sciences, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK.
| | - Anaëlle J Lemasson
- University of Plymouth, School of Biological and Marine Sciences, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK
| | - Louise B Firth
- University of Plymouth, School of Biological and Marine Sciences, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK
| | - Todd Bond
- The UWA Oceans Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, 6009, Australia; School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, 6009, Australia
| | - Jeremy Claisse
- Department of Biological Sciences, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA, 91768, USA; Vantuna Research Group, Occidental College, Los Angeles, CA, 90041, USA
| | - Joop W P Coolen
- Wageningen Marine Research, Ankerpark 27, 1781 AG, Den Helder, Netherlands
| | - Andrea Copping
- Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Seattle, USA
| | - Jennifer Dannheim
- Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Am Handelshafen 12, 27570, Bremerhaven, Germany
| | - Michela De Dominicis
- National Oceanography Centre, Joseph Proudman Building, 6 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L3 5DA, UK
| | - Steven Degraer
- Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Operational Directory Natural Environment, Marine Ecology and Management, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Michael Elliott
- School of Environmental Sciences, University of Hull, HU6 7RX, UK; International Estuarine & Coastal Specialists (IECS) Ltd., Leven, HU17 5LQ, UK
| | - Paul G Fernandes
- Heriot-Watt University, The Lyell Centre, Research Avenue South, Edinburgh, EH14 4AP, UK
| | - Ashley M Fowler
- New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Mosman, NSW, 2088, Australia
| | - Matt Frost
- Plymouth Marine Laboratory, The Hoe Plymouth, Prospect Place, Devon, PL13DH, UK
| | - Lea-Anne Henry
- School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, King's Buildings Campus, James Hutton Road, EH9 3FE, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Natalie Hicks
- School of Life Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, Essex, UK
| | - Kieran Hyder
- Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Lowestoft, UK; School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Sylvia Jagerroos
- King Abdullah University of Science & Technology (KAUST), Thuwal, 23955, Saudi Arabia
| | - Daniel O B Jones
- National Oceanography Centre, European Way, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, UK
| | - Milton Love
- Marine Science Institute, University of California Santa Barbara, USA
| | - Christopher P Lynam
- Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Lowestoft, UK
| | - Peter I Macreadie
- Deakin University, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Burwood, Australia
| | - Joseph Marlow
- Scottish Association for Marine Science (SAMS), Oban, UK
| | - Ninon Mavraki
- Wageningen Marine Research, Ankerpark 27, 1781 AG, Den Helder, Netherlands
| | - Dianne McLean
- The UWA Oceans Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, 6009, Australia; Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS), Perth, Australia
| | - Paul A Montagna
- Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi, TX, USA
| | - David M Paterson
- School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 8LB, UK
| | - Martin Perrow
- Department of Geography, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Joanne Porter
- International Centre Island Technology, Heriot-Watt University, Orkney Campus, Stromness, Orkney, UK
| | | | | | | | - Brooke Shipley
- Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Coastal Fisheries - Artificial Reef Program, USA
| | - Sean van Elden
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, 6009, Australia
| | - Jan Vanaverbeke
- Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Operational Directory Natural Environment, Marine Ecology and Management, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Andrew Want
- Energy and Environment Institute, University of Hull, HU6 7RX, UK
| | - Stephen C L Watson
- Plymouth Marine Laboratory, The Hoe Plymouth, Prospect Place, Devon, PL13DH, UK
| | | | - Paul Somerfield
- Plymouth Marine Laboratory, The Hoe Plymouth, Prospect Place, Devon, PL13DH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Watson SM, McLean DL, Balcom BJ, Birchenough SNR, Brand AM, Camprasse ECM, Claisse JT, Coolen JWP, Cresswell T, Fokkema B, Gourvenec S, Henry LA, Hewitt CL, Love MS, MacIntosh AE, Marnane M, McKinley E, Micallef S, Morgan D, Nicolette J, Ounanian K, Patterson J, Seath K, Selman AGL, Suthers IM, Todd VLG, Tung A, Macreadie PI. Offshore decommissioning horizon scan: Research priorities to support decision-making activities for oil and gas infrastructure. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2023; 878:163015. [PMID: 36965737 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
Thousands of oil and gas structures have been installed in the world's oceans over the past 70 years to meet the population's reliance on hydrocarbons. Over the last decade, there has been increased concern over how to handle decommissioning of this infrastructure when it reaches the end of its operational life. Complete or partial removal may or may not present the best option when considering potential impacts on the environment, society, technical feasibility, economy, and future asset liability. Re-purposing of offshore structures may also be a valid legal option under international maritime law where robust evidence exists to support this option. Given the complex nature of decommissioning offshore infrastructure, a global horizon scan was undertaken, eliciting input from an interdisciplinary cohort of 35 global experts to develop the top ten priority research needs to further inform decommissioning decisions and advance our understanding of their potential impacts. The highest research priorities included: (1) an assessment of impacts of contaminants and their acceptable environmental limits to reduce potential for ecological harm; (2) defining risk and acceptability thresholds in policy/governance; (3) characterising liability issues of ongoing costs and responsibility; and (4) quantification of impacts to ecosystem services. The remaining top ten priorities included: (5) quantifying ecological connectivity; (6) assessing marine life productivity; (7) determining feasibility of infrastructure re-use; (8) identification of stakeholder views and values; (9) quantification of greenhouse gas emissions; and (10) developing a transdisciplinary decommissioning decision-making process. Addressing these priorities will help inform policy development and governance frameworks to provide industry and stakeholders with a clearer path forward for offshore decommissioning. The principles and framework developed in this paper are equally applicable for informing responsible decommissioning of offshore renewable energy infrastructure, in particular wind turbines, a field that is accelerating rapidly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah M Watson
- Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia
| | - Dianne L McLean
- Australian Institute of Marine Science, Indian Ocean Marine Research Centre, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia; Oceans Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia.
| | | | - Silvana N R Birchenough
- The Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Lowestoft NR33 0HT, United Kingdom
| | - Alison M Brand
- Manta Environmental Limited, Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Elodie C M Camprasse
- Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia
| | - Jeremy T Claisse
- California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA 91786, USA; Vantuna Research Group, Occidental College, Los Angeles, CA 90041, USA
| | | | - Tom Cresswell
- Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, New Illawarra Road, Lucas Heights, New South Wales 2234, Australia
| | - Bert Fokkema
- Shell Global Solutions International B.V., 2596HR The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Susan Gourvenec
- Centre of Excellence for Intelligent & Resilient Ocean Engineering, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 7QF, UK
| | - Lea-Anne Henry
- School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, King's Buildings Campus, James Hutton Road, EH9 3FE Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Chad L Hewitt
- Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia; Lincoln University, Lincoln, New Zealand
| | - Milton S Love
- Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93016, USA
| | - Amy E MacIntosh
- Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, New Illawarra Road, Lucas Heights, New South Wales 2234, Australia; School of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, Sydney, New South Wales 2109, Australia
| | - Michael Marnane
- Chevron Energy Technology Pty Ltd, 250 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia 6000, Australia
| | - Emma McKinley
- School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
| | - Shannon Micallef
- Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, Australia
| | - Deborah Morgan
- Xodus Group, Xodus House, Huntly Street, Aberdeen AB10 1RS, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph Nicolette
- Montrose Environmental Solutions Inc., Northridge Road, Sandy Springs, GA 30350, USA
| | - Kristen Ounanian
- Centre for Blue Governance, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - Karen Seath
- Society for Underwater Technology, International Salvage & Decommissioning Committee, UK; Karen Seath Solutions, Anstruther, Scotland, UK
| | - Allison G L Selman
- Asset Lifecycle Manager, Atteris Pty Ltd, Perth, Western Australia 6000, Australia
| | - Iain M Suthers
- School of Biological, Earth & Environmental Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia
| | - Victoria L G Todd
- Ocean Science Consulting Ltd., Spott Road, Dunbar, East Lothian EH42 1RR, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Aaron Tung
- University of Aberdeen, School of Law, Aberdeen, UK; Curtin Institute for Energy Transition, Technology Park, Bentley, Western Australia 6102, Australia; Woodside Energy, Mia Yellagonga, 11 Mount Street, Perth, Western Australia 6000, Australia
| | - Peter I Macreadie
- Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Koppel DJ, Cresswell T, MacIntosh A, von Hellfeld R, Hastings A, Higgins S. Threshold values for the protection of marine ecosystems from NORM in subsea oil and gas infrastructure. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY 2023; 258:107093. [PMID: 36621180 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2022.107093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Revised: 12/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
This modelling study uses the ERICA Tool and Bateman's equation to derive sediment threshold values for radiation protection of the marine environment relevant to NORM-contaminated products (radium-contaminated scales, 210Pb films and 210Po films) found in subsea oil and gas infrastructure. Threshold values are calculated as the activity concentration of the NORM-contaminated products' head of chain radionuclide (i.e., 226Ra + 228Ra, 210Pb, or 210Po) that will increase radiation dose rates in sediments by 10 μGy/h to the most exposed organism at a given release time. The minimum threshold value (corresponding to peak radiation dose rates from the ingrowth of progeny) were for radium-contaminated scales, 0.009 Bq/g of 226Ra, 0.029 Bq/g of 228Ra (in the absence of 226Ra) or 0.14 Bq/g of 228Ra (in the presence of 226Ra), followed by 0.015 Bq/g for 210Pb films, and 1.6 Bq/g for 210Po films. These may be used as default threshold values. Added activity concentrations of the NORM-contaminated products to marine sediments below these threshold values implies a low radiological risk to organisms while exceedances imply that further investigation is necessary. Using contaminated product specific parameterisations, such as Kd values derived for Ra from a BaSO4 matrix in seawater, could greatly affect threshold values. Strong consideration should be given to deriving such data as part of specific radiological risk assessments for these products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren J Koppel
- Curtin University Oil and Gas Innovation Centre, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia; Australian Institute of Marine Science, Crawley, WA, Australia.
| | - Tom Cresswell
- Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Lucas Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Amy MacIntosh
- Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Lucas Heights, NSW, Australia; Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rebecca von Hellfeld
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK; National Decommissioning Centre, Ellon, Scotland, UK
| | - Astley Hastings
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK; National Decommissioning Centre, Ellon, Scotland, UK
| | - Stuart Higgins
- Curtin University Oil and Gas Innovation Centre, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lemasson AJ, Somerfield PJ, Schratzberger M, McNeill CL, Nunes J, Pascoe C, Watson SCL, Thompson MSA, Couce E, Knights AM. Evidence for the effects of decommissioning man-made structures on marine ecosystems globally: a systematic map. ENVIRONMENTAL EVIDENCE 2022; 11:35. [PMID: 39294784 PMCID: PMC11378805 DOI: 10.1186/s13750-022-00285-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 09/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many marine man-made structures (MMS), such as oil and gas platforms or offshore wind turbines, are nearing their 'end-of-life' and require decommissioning. Limited understanding of MMS decommissioning effects currently restricts the consideration of alternative management possibilities, often leaving complete removal as the only option in certain parts of the world. This evidence-base describes the ecosystem effects of marine MMS whilst in place and following cessation of operations, with a view to informing decision-making related to their potential decommissioning. METHOD The protocol used to create this map was published a priori. Systematic searches of published, literature in English were conducted using three bibliographic databases, ten specialist organisational websites or repositories, and one search engine, up to early 2021. A total of 15,697 unique articles were identified as potentially relevant to our research questions, of which 2,230 were screened at the full-text level. Of that subset, 860 articles met all pre-defined eligibility criteria. A further 119 articles were identified through "snowballing" of references from literature reviews. The final database consists of 979 articles. For each article included, metadata were extracted for key variables of interest and coded into a database. REVIEW FINDINGS The vast majority of eligible articles related to the presence of MMS (96.2%), while just 5.8% considered decommissioning. Overall, articles mainly considered artificial reefs (51.5% of all articles) but increasingly oil and gas (22%), shipwrecks (15.1%) and offshore wind (13.1%). Studies were distributed globally, but the majority focused on the United States, single countries within Europe, Australia, Brazil, China, and Israel; 25 studies spanned multiple countries. Consequently, the bulk of the studies focused on the North Atlantic (incl. Gulf of Mexico, North Sea, and Mediterranean Sea) and North Pacific Oceans. A further 12 studies had a global scope. Studies in majority reported on fish (53%) and invertebrates (41%), and were disproportionately focused on biological (81%) and ecological (48%) impacts. Physico-chemical (13%), habitat (7%), socio-cultural (7%), economic (4%) and functional (8%) outcomes have received less attention. The number of decommissioning studies has been increasing since ca. 2012 but remains noticeably low. Studies mostly focus on oil and gas infrastructures in the USA (Gulf of Mexico) and Northern Europe (North Sea), covering 9 different decommissioning options. CONCLUSIONS This systematic map, the first of its kind, reveals a substantial body of peer-reviewed evidence relating to the presence of MMS in the sea and their impacts, but with considerable bias toward biological and ecological outcomes over abiotic and socio-economic outcomes. The map reveals extremely limited direct evidence of decommissioning effects, likely driven at least in part by international policy preventing consideration of a range of decommissioning options beyond complete removal. Despite evidence of MMS impacts continuing to grow exponentially since the early 1970s, this map reveals key gaps in evidence to support best practice in developing decommissioning options that consider environmental, social and economic effects. Relevant evidence is required to generate greater understanding in those areas and ensure decommissioning options deliver optimal ecosystem outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anaëlle J Lemasson
- School of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK.
| | - Paul J Somerfield
- PML -Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth, PL1 3DH, UK
| | - Michaela Schratzberger
- Cefas - Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft Laboratory, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, NR33 0HT, Suffolk, UK
| | | | - Joana Nunes
- PML -Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth, PL1 3DH, UK
| | - Christine Pascoe
- PML -Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth, PL1 3DH, UK
| | - Stephen C L Watson
- PML -Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth, PL1 3DH, UK
| | - Murray S A Thompson
- Cefas - Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft Laboratory, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, NR33 0HT, Suffolk, UK
| | - Elena Couce
- Cefas - Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Lowestoft Laboratory, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, NR33 0HT, Suffolk, UK
| | - Antony M Knights
- School of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
MacIntosh A, Koppel DJ, Johansen MP, Beresford NA, Copplestone D, Penrose B, Cresswell T. Radiological risk assessment to marine biota from exposure to NORM from a decommissioned offshore oil and gas pipeline. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY 2022; 251-252:106979. [PMID: 35963215 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2022.106979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Scale residues can accumulate on the interior surfaces of subsea petroleum pipes and may incorporate naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM). The persistent nature of 'NORM scale' may result in a radiological dose to the organisms living on or near intact pipelines. Following a scenario of in-situ decommissioning of a subsea pipeline, marine organisms occupying the exteriors or interiors of petroleum structures may have close contact with the scale or other NORM-associated contaminated substances and suffer subsequent radiological effects. This case study used radiological dose modelling software, including the ERICA Tool (v2.0), MicroShield® Pro and mathematical equations, to estimate the likely radiological doses and risks of effects from NORM-contaminated scale to marine biota from a decommissioned offshore oil and gas pipeline. Using activity concentrations of NORM (226Ra, 210Po, 210Pb, 228Ra, 228Th) from a subsea pipeline from Australia, environmental realistic exposure scenarios including radiological exposures from both an intact pipe (external only; accounting for radiation shielding by a cylindrical carbon steel pipe) and a decommissioned pipeline with corrosive breakthrough (resulting in both internal and external radiological exposure) were simulated to estimate doses to model marine organisms. Predicted dose rates for both the external only exposure (ranging from 26 μGy/h to 33 μGy/h) and a corroded pipeline (ranging from 300 μGy/h to 16,000 μGy/h) exceeded screening levels for radiological doses to environmental receptors. The study highlighted the importance of using scale-specific solubility data (i.e., Kd) values for individual NORM radionuclides for ERICA assessments. This study provides an approach for conducting marine organism dose assessments for NORM-contaminated subsea pipelines and highlights scientific gaps required to undertake risk assessments necessary to inform infrastructure decommissioning planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy MacIntosh
- Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Lucas Heights, NSW, Australia; School of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Darren J Koppel
- Curtin University Oil and Gas Innovation Centre, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Mathew P Johansen
- Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Lucas Heights, NSW, Australia
| | | | - David Copplestone
- Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom
| | - Beth Penrose
- Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Tom Cresswell
- Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Lucas Heights, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Elliott M, Birchenough SNR. Man-made marine structures - Agents of marine environmental change or just other bits of the hard stuff? MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN 2022; 176:113468. [PMID: 35189531 DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Elliott
- International Estuarine & Coastal Specialists (IECS) Ltd, Leven HU17 5LQ, UK; Department of Biological & Marine Sciences, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|