Prenatal diagnosis in haemophilia A: experience of the genetic diagnostic laboratory

Robust preimplantation genetic testing of the common F8 Inv22 pathogenic variant of severe hemophilia A using a highly polymorphic multi-marker panel encompassing the paracentric inversion

BACKGROUND

Hemophilia A (HEMA) is an X-linked bleeding disorder caused by reduced/absent coagulation factor VIII expression, as a result of pathogenic variants in the F8 gene. Preimplantation prevention of HEMA should ideally include direct pathogenic F8 variant detection, complemented by linkage analysis of flanking markers to identify the high-risk F8 allele. Linkage analysis is particularly indispensable when the pathogenic variant cannot be detected directly or identified. This study evaluated the suitability of a panel of F8 intragenic and extragenic short tandem repeat markers for standalone linkage-based preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorder (PGT-M) of the Inv22 pathogenic variant, an almost 600 kb paracentric inversion responsible for almost half of all severe HEMA globally, for which direct detection is challenging.

METHODS

Thirteen markers spanning 1 Mb and encompassing both F8 and the Inv22 inversion interval were genotyped in 153 unrelated females of Viet Kinh ethnicity.

RESULTS

All individuals were heterozygous for ≥ 1 marker, ~ 90% were heterozygous for ≥ 1 of the five F8 intragenic markers, and almost 98% were heterozygous for ≥ 1 upstream (telomeric) and ≥ 1 downstream (centromeric) markers. A prospective PGT-M couple at risk of transmitting F8 Inv22 were fully informative at four marker loci (2 intra-inversion, 1 centromeric, 1 telomeric) and partially informative at another five (2 intra-inversion, 3 centromeric), allowing robust phasing of low- and high-risk haplotypes. In vitro fertilization produced three embryos, all of which clearly inherited the low-risk maternal allele, enabling reliable unaffected diagnoses. A single embryo transfer produced a clinical pregnancy, which was confirmed as unaffected by amniocentesis and long-range PCR, and a healthy baby girl was delivered at term.

CONCLUSION

Robust and reliable PGT-M of HEMA, including the common F8 Inv22 pathogenic variant, can be achieved with sufficient informative intragenic and flanking markers.

Prenatal diagnostic techniques and IVF in patients with coagulopathies

Hemophilia and other hereditary coagulopathies tend to be associated with a huge negative impact both for individuals who suffer the disease and for their families. In this respect, hemophilia carriers feel the need to make reproductive decisions which will inevitably affect their children, their families and from themselves. Genetic and reproductive counseling is of the essence to alleviate these women's distress. Prenatal diagnosis and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) allow couples at high-risk of transmitting genetic diseases like hemophilia and other hereditary coagulopathies to prevent the birth of children with the disease. The main difference between prenatal diagnosis and PGD is related to the time at which diagnosis is made. Prenatal diagnosis is done when the woman is pregnant, and both the performance of the technique and its result can affect the course of pregnancy. PGD is a diagnostic procedure in which embryos created in vitro are analyzed for genetic defects before being transferred to the uterus. Performance of both prenatal diagnosis and PGD is subject to a few prerequisites: the establishment of an exact clinical diagnosis, an understanding of the parental genetic alterations that are responsible for the disease and technical feasibility of genetic diagnosis. These couples should be provided with complete, up-to-date and easy-to-understand information.

Prenatal molecular testing and diagnosis of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to describe molecular findings and phenotypic features among individuals referred for prenatal Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) testing.

METHODS

Molecular diagnostic testing was performed using a sensitive quantitative real-time PCR-based assay capable of detecting mosaic methylation to the level of 3% at IC1 and IC2. Sanger sequencing of CDKN1C was performed in cases with normal methylation.

RESULTS

Of the 94 patients tested, a molecular diagnosis was identified for 25.5% of cases; 70.9% of diagnosed cases had loss of methylation at IC2, 4.2% had gain of methylation at IC1, 12.5% had paternal uniparental isodisomy, and 12.5% had CDKN1C loss-of-function variants. Methylation level changes in prenatal cases were significantly greater than changes identified in cases tested after birth. Cases with a prenatal molecular diagnosis had a significantly greater number of BWS-associated phenotypic features. The presence of either macroglossia or placentomegaly was most predictive of a BWS diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Our results support the consensus statement advocating BWS molecular testing for all patients with one or more BWS-associated prenatal features and suggest that low-level mosaic methylation changes may be uncommon among prenatal BWS diagnoses.

Improved molecular detection of mosaicism in Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome (BWS) is characterised by overgrowth and tumour predisposition. While multiple epigenetic and genetic mechanisms cause BWS, the majority are caused by methylation defects in imprinting control regions on chromosome 11p15.5. Disease-causing methylation defects are often mosaic within affected individuals. Phenotypic variability among individuals with chromosome 11p15.5 defects and tissue mosaicism led to the definition of the Beckwith-Wiedemann Spectrum (BWSp). Molecular diagnosis of BWSp requires use of multiple sensitive diagnostic techniques to reliably detect low-level aberrations.

METHODS

Multimodal BWS diagnostic testing was performed on samples from 1057 individuals. Testing included use of a sensitive qRT-PCR-based quantitation method enabling identification of low-level mosaic disease, identification of CNVs within 11p15.5 via array comparative genomic hybridisation or qRT-PCR, and Sanger sequencing of CDKN1C.

RESULTS

A molecular diagnosis was confirmed for 27.4% of individuals tested, of whom 43.4% had mosaic disease. The presence of a single cardinal feature was associated with a molecular diagnosis of BWSp in 20% of cases. Additionally, significant differences in the prevalence of mosaic disease among BWS molecular subtypes were identified. Finally, the diagnostic yield obtained by testing solid tissue samples from individuals with negative blood testing results shows improved molecular diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the prevalence of mosaic disease among individuals with BWSp and the increases in diagnostic yield obtained via testing both blood and solid tissue samples from affected individuals. Additionally, the results establish the presence of a molecular diagnosis in individuals with very subtle features of BWSp.

11p15.5 epimutations in children with Wilms tumor and hepatoblastoma detected in peripheral blood

Background

Constitutional or somatic mosaic epimutations are increasingly recognized as a mechanism of gene dysregulation resulting in cancer susceptibility. Beckwith‐Wiedemann syndrome is the cancer predisposition syndrome most commonly associated with epimutation and is extremely variable in its phenotypic presentation, which can include isolated tumors. Because to the authors' knowledge large‐scale germline DNA sequencing studies have not included methylation analysis, the percentage of pediatric cancer predisposition that is due to epimutations is unknown.

Methods

Germline methylation testing at the 11p15.5 locus was performed in blood for 24 consecutive patients presenting with hepatoblastoma (3 patients) or Wilms tumor (21 patients).

Results

Six individuals with Wilms tumor and 1 patient with hepatoblastoma were found to have low‐level gain of methylation at imprinting control 1, and a child with hepatoblastoma was found to have loss of methylation at imprinting control 2. The loss of methylation at imprinting control 2 was found to be maternally inherited, despite not being associated with any detectable genomic alteration.

Conclusions

Overall, 33% of patients (8 of 24 patients) with Wilms tumor or hepatoblastoma were found to have an epigenetic susceptibility that was detectable in the blood. It is interesting to note that low‐level gain of methylation at imprinting control 1 predominantly was detected in females with bilateral Wilms tumors. Further studies in larger cohorts are needed to determine the efficacy of testing all patients with Wilms tumor or hepatoblastoma for 11p15.5 epimutations in the blood as part of DNA analysis because this hallmark of predisposition will not be detected by sequencing‐based approaches and detecting a cancer predisposition may modify treatment.

In the current study, all patients presenting with Wilms tumor or hepatoblastoma undergo 11p15.5 methylation analysis. Approximately one‐third are found to have an epimutation at this locus that is detectable in peripheral blood.

Optimizing bleed prevention throughout the lifespan: Womb to Tomb

The focus of care providers, patients and families is the ability to tailor care for persons with haemophilia (PWH) across the lifespan. Care requires knowledge of the bleeding disorder and age-related complications, risk of therapeutic interventions, and evaluation of individual characteristics that contribute to outcomes. The ultimate goal is to live a normal life without the burden of bleeding, for PWH and carriers. A wide range of therapeutic options is required to achieve personalized care. Over the last decade, substantial therapeutic advantages have been achieved in the treatment of haemophilia that include the development of a robust array of factor concentrates, novel haemostatic agents, and increased knowledge and awareness of disease associated outcomes and risk factors. Significant strides on the road to accessible gene therapy have been realized. This increased range of therapeutic modalities provides options for development and implementation of care plans for each patient at each stage of life that are more flexible compared to prior care regimens. Paradigms for management of haemophilia are changing. As a community, we must work together to use these resources wisely, to learn from outcomes with new therapies and diagnostic tools, to assure all patients can achieve improved care and outcomes regardless of disease state or country of origin.

Joint SOGC-CCMG Opinion for Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening: An Update for All Canadian Providers of Maternity and Reproductive Healthcare in the Era of Direct-to-Consumer Testing

OBJECTIVE

This guideline was written to update Canadian maternity care and reproductive healthcare providers on pre- and postconceptional reproductive carrier screening for women or couples who may be at risk of being carriers for autosomal recessive (AR), autosomal dominant (AD), or X-linked (XL) conditions, with risk of transmission to the fetus. Four previous SOGC- Canadian College of Medical Geneticists (CCMG) guidelines are updated and merged into the current document.

INTENDED USERS

All maternity care (most responsible health provider [MRHP]) and paediatric providers; maternity nursing; nurse practitioner; provincial maternity care administrator; medical student; and postgraduate resident year 1-7.

TARGET POPULATION

Fertile, sexually active females and their fertile, sexually active male partners who are either planning a pregnancy or are pregnant (preferably in the first trimester of pregnancy, but any gestational age is acceptable).

OPTIONS

Women and their partners will be able to obtain appropriate genetic carrier screening information and possible diagnosis of AR, AD, or XL disorders (preferably pre-conception), thereby allowing an informed choice regarding genetic carrier screening and reproductive options (e.g., prenatal diagnosis, preimplantation genetic diagnosis, egg or sperm donation, or adoption).

OUTCOMES

Informed reproductive decisions related to genetic carrier screening and reproductive outcomes based on family history, ethnic background, past obstetrical history, known carrier status, or genetic diagnosis. SOGC REPRODUCTIVE CARRIER SCREENING SUMMARY STATEMENT (2016): Pre-conception or prenatal education and counselling for reproductive carrier screening requires a discussion about testing within the three perinatal genetic carrier screening/diagnosis time periods, which include pre-conception, prenatal, and neonatal for conditions currently being screened for and diagnosed. This new information should be added to the standard reproductive carrier screening protocols that are already being utilized by the most responsible maternity provider through the informed consent process with the patient. (III-A; GRADE low/moderate) SOGC OVERVIEW OF RECOMMENDATIONS QUALITY AND GRADE: There was a strong observational/expert opinion (quality and grade) for the genetic carrier literature with randomized controlled trial evidence being available only for the invasive testing. Both the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care quality and classification and the GRADE evidence quality and grade are provided.

EVIDENCE

MEDLINE; PubMed; government neonatal screening websites; key words/common reproductive genetic carrier screened diseases/previous SOGC Guidelines/medical academic societies (Society of Maternal-Fetal Medicine [SMFM]; American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists [ACOG]; CCMG; Royal College Obstetrics and Gynaecology [RCOG] [UK]; American Society of Human Genetics [ASHG]; International Society of Prenatal Diagnosis [ISPD])/provincial neonatal screening policies and programs; search terms (carrier screening, prenatal screening, neonatal genetic/metabolic screening, cystic fibrosis (CF), thalassemia, hemoglobinopathy, hemophilia, Fragile X syndrome (FXS), spinal muscular atrophy, Ashkenazi Jewish carrier screening, genetic carrier screening protocols, AR, AD, XL).

SEARCH PERIOD

10 years (June 2005-September 2015); initial search dates June 30, 2015 and September 15, 2015; completed final search January 4, 2016. Validation of articles was completed by primary authors RD Wilson and I De Bie.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COST

Benefits are to provide an evidenced based reproductive genetic carrier screening update consensus based on international opinions and publications for the use of Canadian women, who are planning a pregnancy or who are pregnant and have been identified to be at risk (personal or male partner family or reproductive history) for the transmission of a clinically significant genetic condition to their offspring with associated morbidity and/or mortality. Harm may arise from having counselling and informed testing of the carrier status of the mother, their partner, or their fetus, as well as from declining to have this counselling and informed testing or from not having the opportunity for counselling and informed testing. Costs will ensue both from the provision of opportunities for counselling and testing, as well as when no such opportunities are offered or are declined and the birth of a child with a significant inherited condition and resulting morbidity/mortality occurs; these comprise not only the health care costs to the system but also the social/financial/psychological/emotional costs to the family. These recommendations are based on expert opinion and have not been subjected to a health economics assessment and local or provincial implementation will be required.

GUIDELINE UPDATE

This guideline is an update of four previous joint SOGC-CCMG Genetic Screening Guidelines dated 2002, 2006, 2008, and 2008 developed by the SOGC Genetic Committee in collaboration with the CCMG Prenatal Diagnosis Committee (now Clinical Practice Committee). 2016 CARRIER SCREENING RECOMMENDATIONS.

Partnering to change the world for people with haemophilia: 7th Haemophilia Global Summit, Madrid, Spain 22-24 September 2016

The 7th Haemophilia Global Summit was held in Madrid, Spain, in September 2016. With a programme designed, for the 6th consecutive year, by a Scientific Steering Committee of haemophilia experts, the aim of the summit was to share optimal management strategies for haemophilia at all life stages and to provide an opportunity for specialists from across the haemophilia multidisciplinary care team to engage in discussion and debate with leading international experts on current and future areas of research. Topics covered ranged from the optimisation of haemophilia management, emerging issues in clinical care, practical approaches and future perspectives, in addition to patient engagement and empowerment in modern haemophilia care.

Fetal nucleated red blood cell analysis for non-invasive prenatal diagnostics using a nanostructure microchip

Cell-free DNA has been widely used in non-invasive prenatal diagnostics (NIPD) nowadays. Compared to these incomplete and multi-source DNA fragments, fetal nucleated red blood cells (fNRBCs), once as an aided biomarker to monitor potential fetal pathological conditions, have re-attracted research interest in NIPD because of their definite fetal source and the total genetic information contained in the nuclei. Isolating these fetal cells from maternal peripheral blood and subsequent cell-based bio-analysis make maximal genetic diagnosis possible, while causing minimal harm to the fetus or its mother. In this paper, an affinity microchip is reported which uses hydroxyapatite/chitosan nanoparticles as well as immuno-agent anti-CD147 to effectively isolate fNRBCs from maternal peripheral blood, and on-chip biomedical analysis was demonstrated as a proof of concept for NIPD based on fNRBCs. Tens of fNRBCs can be isolated from 1 mL of peripheral blood (almost 25 mL^-1 in average) from normal pregnant women (from the 10th to 30th gestational week). The diagnostic application of fNRBCs for fetal chromosome disorders (Trisomy 13 and 21) was also demonstrated. Our method offers effective isolation and accurate analysis of fNRBCs to implement comprehensive NIPD and to enhance insights into fetal cell development.

Evaluation of factor VIII polymorphic short tandem repeat markers in linkage analysis for carrier diagnosis of hemophilia A

Hemophilia A (HA) is the most common inherited X-linked recessive bleeding disorder caused by heterogeneous mutations in the factor VIII gene (FVIII). Diagnosis of the carrier is critical for preventing the birth of children affected by this coagulation disorder, which ultimately facilitates its management. Due to the heterogeneous nature of mutations, the large inversions and the complexity of the FVIII gene, direct recognition of the disease-associated mutation in HA is complex. Indirect linkage analysis using highly informative heterozygous polymorphic markers is an alternative method for determining the co-segregation of the mutant gene within a family for carrier detection of HA. The aim of the present study was to perform carrier diagnosis in a family with HA. Rapid multifluorescent polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed with six extragenic short tandem repeats (STRs), DXS1073, DXS15, DXS8091, DXS1227, DXS991, DXS993 and one intragenic marker, STR22 for linkage analysis in the HA family. All the STR markers employed in the present study were informative for linkages of pathogenic and healthy haplotypes among family members, particularly STR22, DXS1073 and DXS15. The STR marker, STR22, is within the FVIII gene while the DXS1073 and DXS15 markers are very close to the FVIII gene, where the chances of recombination are comparatively low, and provided the most accurate interpretation analysis, indicating that the proband's sister may have been the HA carrier. Rapid multifluorescent PCR using STR markers and linkage analysis was identified to be a simple method for performing HA carrier diagnosis.

Prenatal diagnosis for haemophilia: the Thai experience

BACKGROUND

Haemophilia is a lifelong X-linked recessive inherited bleeding disorder. Since the haemophilia management in economically less-developed countries is inadequately provided, prevention of new cases of haemophilia is essentially required.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A total of 42 pregnancies in 37 women at risk for severe and moderate haemophilia (A = 33, B = 4) were enrolled. The prenatal diagnostic (PND) procedure was performed in 32 women, while 10 women refused further PND procedure after knowing their foetuses were female (n = 8) and male (n = 2). The foetal specimen was obtained through chorionic villus sampling (n = 14), amniocentesis (n = 1) and cordocentesis (n = 17). The status of haemophilia was determined using informative RFLP markers and inversion of intron 22 of the F8 gene, and/or foetal FVIII:C or FIX:C.

RESULTS

The final diagnosis revealed normal males (n = 18), haemophilia A males (n = 9), normal females (n = 3) and haemophilia A carrier females (n = 2). All women with affected haemophilia sons requested to terminate their pregnancies except one woman. One of 32 pregnancies (3.1%) had spontaneous abortion. At follow-up after birth, the PND was accurately confirmed in one haemophilia A male, three normal females and two carrier females by laboratory testing, and 18 unaffected normal males by history taking of no bleeding manifestations. However, 10 women who continued their pregnancies after knowing foetal sex turned out to have two haemophilia A males, one normal female, one haemophilia A carrier female and six normal or carrier females.

CONCLUSION

The PND of haemophilia could be accurately determined but it was not well accepted by all couples at risk.