Management of people with haemophilia A undergoing surgery while receiving emicizumab prophylaxis: Real-world experience from a large comprehensive treatment centre in the US

Simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq®) in children: early steps in life's journey for people with severe hemophilia A

People with severe hemophilia A usually experience their first bleed early in life. In children with severe hemophilia A, primary prophylaxis is recommended to prevent recurrent and potentially life-threatening bleeds that significantly impact day-to-day life. Factor VIII (FVIII) prophylaxis is well-established in children and has been shown to reduce the development of hemophilic arthropathy. However, a major challenge of FVIII therapy is the development of neutralizing anti-FVIII antibodies (FVIII inhibitors). Simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq®) is a human cell line-derived recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) whose immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety have been studied in 167 children with severe hemophilia A across two prospective clinical trials and their long-term extensions. In 105 previously untreated children, the inhibitor rate of 16.2% for high-titer inhibitors (26.7% for all inhibitors) was lower than published rates for hamster cell line-derived rFVIII products. There was no inhibitor development in previously untreated children with non-null F8 mutations and in previously treated children. In a case series of 10 inhibitor patients, 8 (80%) underwent successful immune tolerance induction with simoctocog alfa with a median time to undetectable inhibitor of 3.5 months. In an analysis of 96 children who enrolled in the extension studies and received long-term simoctocog alfa prophylaxis for up to 5 years, median spontaneous, joint, and total annualized bleeding rates were 0.3, 0.4, and 1.8, respectively. No thromboembolisms were reported in any of the 167 children, and there were no treatment-related deaths. Optimal care of children should consider several factors, including minimization of inhibitor development risk, maintaining tolerance to FVIII, highly effective bleed prevention and treatment, safety, and impact on long-term outcomes such as bone and joint health. In this context we review the pediatric clinical data and ongoing studies with simoctocog alfa.

Expert Opinions on the Management of Hemophilia A in India: The Role of Emicizumab

Hemophilia A (HA) is a genetic disorder of hemostasis associated with a deficiency or reduced activity of clotting factor VIII (FVIII). This disorder remains unacceptably underdiagnosed in India. Early diagnosis and appropriate management of HA can substantially prevent morbidity and mortality. Currently, HA is managed with regular replacement therapy using standard or extended half-life FVIII concentrates or non-factor drug products. The challenges associated with FVIII concentrates include plateauing of drug effect, issues with its administration and adherence to treatment, breakthrough bleeds, and the development of inhibiting antibodies against administered clotting factors. Emicizumab is a bispecific antibody, launched in India in April 2019, for managing patients with HA. To investigate the role of emicizumab in Indian patients with HA, opinions were sought from 13 eminent hematologists and experts from India on the effectiveness of emicizumab in preventing all bleeds, spontaneous bleeds, perioperative bleeds, and intracranial hemorrhage; resolving target joints; and reducing the rate of hospitalizations and fatality associated with HA in children and adults, with or without inhibitors. The benefits of emicizumab over traditional FVIII concentrates include the subcutaneous route of delivery, less frequent dosing, and a lack of inhibitor development, in addition to providing sustained hemostasis without in-depth monitoring. It is a safe and effective management option for all HA patients, especially for patients with certain archetypes, such as those with inhibitors, those with high annualized bleed rates, those living far away from hemophilia care centers, pediatric patients and infants with intravenous access challenges, and those with a history of life-threatening bleeding events.

Safety of recombinant activated factor VII for treatment of breakthrough bleeds in patients with congenital haemophilia A and inhibitors receiving emicizumab prophylaxis: Review of the real-world evidence

BACKGROUND

Emicizumab is used as a subcutaneous prophylaxis for prevention of bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia A (HA) with and without inhibitors. While low bleeding rates were observed in clinical trials, patients still experience breakthrough bleeds (BTBs) with emicizumab in the real-world. Current guidelines recommend use of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) for treatment of BTBs in patients with inhibitors. Due to thrombotic events observed in the HAVEN 1 study, activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) should be used with caution.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review is to identify and discuss real-world data on the frequency of BTBs and the safety of concomitant rFVIIa use in patients with inhibitors on emicizumab prophylaxis.

METHODS

A search of the following databases was conducted on 15 July 2022: BIOSIS Previews® , Current Contents Search® , Embase® , MEDLINE® . Search terms included 'real world', 'haemophilia A', and 'emicizumab'.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Eleven relevant publications were identified (seven original research articles and four congress abstracts). The frequency of BTBs specifically for HA patients with inhibitors was described in three publications with 5%-56% patients on emicizumab reporting ≥1 bleeding episode. Treatment of these BTBs appeared to be managed according to relevant guidelines. Importantly, no thrombotic complications occurred during concomitant rFVIIa use. Due to the nature of real-world studies, direct comparison of the results between studies is limited. However, real-world data show that BTBs in inhibitor patients during emicizumab prophylaxis can be safely treated with rFVIIa.

Nothing short of a revolution: Novel extended half-life factor VIII replacement products and non-replacement agents reshape the treatment landscape in hemophilia A

Hemophilia A, an X-linked genetic disorder, is characterized by a deficiency or dysfunction of clotting Factor VIII. The treatment landscape has substantially changed by introducing novel extended half-life factor VIII (EHL-FVIII) replacement therapies such as efanesoctocog Alfa and non-factor replacement therapy such as emicizumab. These agents signal a shift from treatments requiring multiple weekly infusions to advanced therapies with long half-lives, offering superior protection against bleeding and improving patient adherence and quality of life. While EHL-FVIII treatment might lead to inhibitor development in some patients, non-factor replacement therapy carries thrombotic risks. Therefore, ongoing research and the generation of robust clinical evidence remain vital to guide the selection of optimal and cost-effective first-line therapies for hemophilia A patients.

Non-clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeds in people with congenital hemophilia A or B

BACKGROUND

Management of congenital hemophilia A and B is by prophylactic or on-demand replacement therapy with clotting factor concentrates. The effects of newer non-clotting factor therapies such as emicizumab, concizumab, marstacimab, and fitusiran compared with existing standards of care are yet to be systematically reviewed.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects (clinical, economic, patient-reported, and adverse outcomes) of non-clotting factor therapies for preventing bleeding and bleeding-related complications in people with congenital hemophilia A or B compared with prophylaxis with clotting factor therapies, bypassing agents, placebo, or no prophylaxis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Coagulopathies Trials Register, electronic databases, conference proceedings, and reference lists of relevant articles and reviews. The date of the last search was 16 August 2023.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating people with congenital hemophilia A or B with and without inhibitors, who were treated with non-clotting factor therapies to prevent bleeds.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently reviewed studies for eligibility, assessed risk of bias, and extracted data for the primary outcomes (bleeding rates, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), adverse events) and secondary outcomes (joint health, pain scores, and economic outcomes). We assessed the mean difference (MD), risk ratio (RR), 95% confidence interval (CI) of effect estimates, and evaluated the certainty of the evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

Six RCTs (including 397 males aged 12 to 75 years) were eligible for inclusion. Prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy in people with inhibitors Four trials (189 participants) compared emicizumab, fitusiran, and concizumab with on-demand therapy in people with inhibitors. Prophylaxis using emicizumab likely reduced annualized bleeding rates (ABR) for all bleeds (MD -22.80, 95% CI -37.39 to -8.21), treated bleeds (MD -20.40, 95% CI -35.19 to -5.61), and annualized spontaneous bleeds (MD -15.50, 95% CI -24.06 to -6.94), but did not significantly reduce annualized joint and target joint bleeding rates (AjBR and AtjBR) (1 trial; 53 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Fitusiran also likely reduced ABR for all bleeds (MD -28.80, 95% CI -40.07 to -17.53), treated bleeds (MD -16.80, 95% CI -25.80 to -7.80), joint bleeds (MD -12.50, 95% CI -19.91 to -5.09), and spontaneous bleeds (MD -14.80, 95% CI -24.90 to -4.71; 1 trial; 57 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). No evidence was available on the effect of bleed prophylaxis using fitusiran versus on-demand therapy on AtjBR. Concizumab may reduce ABR for all bleeds (MD -12.31, 95% CI -19.17 to -5.45), treated bleeds (MD -10.10, 95% CI -17.74 to -2.46), joint bleeds (MD -9.55, 95% CI -13.55 to -5.55), and spontaneous bleeds (MD -11.96, 95% CI -19.89 to -4.03; 2 trials; 78 participants; very low-certainty evidence), but not target joint bleeds (MD -1.00, 95% CI -3.26 to 1.26). Emicizumab prophylaxis resulted in an 11.31-fold increase, fitusiran in a 12.5-fold increase, and concizumab in a 1.59-fold increase in the proportion of participants with no bleeds. HRQoL measured using the Haemophilia Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) physical and total health scores was improved with emicizumab, fitusiran, and concizumab prophylaxis (low-certainty evidence). Non-serious adverse events were higher with non-clotting factor therapies versus on-demand therapy, with injection site reactions being the most frequently reported adverse events. Transient antidrug antibodies were reported for fitusiran and concizumab. Prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy in people without inhibitors Two trials (208 participants) compared emicizumab and fitusiran with on-demand therapy in people without inhibitors. One trial assessed two doses of emicizumab (1.5 mg/kg weekly and 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly). Fitusiran 80 mg monthly, emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week, and emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly all likely resulted in a large reduction in ABR for all bleeds, all treated bleeds, and joint bleeds. AtjBR was not reduced with either of the emicizumab dosing regimens. The effect of fitusiran prophylaxis on target joint bleeds was not assessed. Spontaneous bleeds were likely reduced with fitusiran (MD -20.21, 95% CI -32.12 to -8.30) and emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly (MD -15.30, 95% CI -30.46 to -0.14), but not with emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week (MD -14.60, 95% CI -29.78 to 0.58). The percentage of participants with zero bleeds was higher following emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week (50% versus 0%), emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly (40% versus 0%), and fitusiran prophylaxis (40% versus 5%) compared with on-demand therapy. Emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg/week did not improve Haem-A-QoL physical and total health scores, EQ-5D-5L VAS, or utility index scores (low-certainty evidence) when compared with on-demand therapy at 25 weeks. Emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg bi-weekly may improve HRQoL measured by the Haem-A-QoL physical health score (MD -15.97, 95% CI -29.14 to -2.80) and EQ-5D-5L VAS (MD 9.15, 95% CI 2.05 to 16.25; 1 trial; 43 participants; low-certainty evidence). Fitusiran may result in improved HRQoL shown as a reduction in Haem-A-QoL total score (MD -7.06, 95% CI -11.50 to -2.62) and physical health score (MD -19.75, 95% CI -25.76 to -11.94; 1 trial; 103 participants; low-certainty evidence). The risk of serious adverse events in participants without inhibitors also likely did not differ following prophylaxis with either emicizumab or fitusiran versus on-demand therapy (moderate-certainty evidence). Transient antidrug antibodies were reported in 4% (3/80) participants to fitusiran, with no observed effect on antithrombin lowering. A comparison of the different dosing regimens of emicizumab identified no differences in bleeding, safety, or patient-reported outcomes. No case of treatment-related cancer or mortality was reported in any study group. None of the included studies assessed our secondary outcomes of joint health, clinical joint function, and economic outcomes. None of the included studies evaluated marstacimab.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from RCTs shows that prophylaxis using non-clotting factor therapies compared with on-demand treatment may reduce bleeding events, increase the percentage of individuals with zero bleeds, increase the incidence of non-serious adverse events, and improve HRQoL. Comparative assessments with other prophylaxis regimens, assessment of long-term joint outcomes, and assessment of economic outcomes will improve evidence-based decision-making for the use of these therapies in bleed prevention.

[Efficacy and safety of prophylaxis with emicizumab in hemophilia A: A study of 13 patients]

INTRODUCTION

Emicizumab is the first non-replacement therapy for prophylaxis in severe hemophilia A.

AIMS

The principal aim of this study is to describe the results of our patients in prophylaxis with emicizumab, according to the usual clinical practice.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Follow-up of 13 patients from the start of prophylaxis, recording of bleeding, surgeries, adverse reactions and the need or not for factor therapy. Plasma levels were measured at follow-up visits, the technique was coagulative in one stage, modified by 1:20 dilution.

RESULTS

Median plasma levels were 52.2mg [30.7-71.9]. Prophylaxis was safe and effective; only one spontaneous haemorrhage was recorded over time and no treatment was required. There were no thromboembolic events or serious hypersensitivity, anaphylaxis or anaphylactoid reactions. The incidence of injection site reactions was 8%. Perioperative management in minor interventions was carried out without adjuvant factorial therapy, in 2 major surgeries a dose of plasmatic FVIII concentrate was required in the patient with hemophilia A without inhibitor and FVII in the patient with inhibitor, and it was sufficient to stop the bleeding.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated emicizumab pharmacokinetics and its half life ensure optimal levels with prophylaxis treatment at doses established in the technical data sheet.

Emicizumab-mediated hemostatic function assessed by thrombin generation assay in an in vitro model of factor VIII-depleted thrombophilia plasma

Patients with hemophilia A (PwHA) may have concurrent deficiency of representative anticoagulant proteins, protein (P)C, PS, and antithrombin (AT), which reduces bleeding frequency. However, emicizumab-driven hemostasis in PwHA with such thrombophilic potential remains unclarified. This study investigated the influence of natural anticoagulants on emicizumab-driven coagulation in HA model plasma. Various concentrations of PS and AT were added to PS-deficient plasma and AT-deficient plasma in the presence of anti-FVIII antibody (FVIIIAb; 10BU/mL). PC-deficient plasma was mixed with normal plasma at various concentrations in the presence of FVIIIAb. Emicizumab (50 µg/mL) was added to these thrombophilic HA model plasmas, prior to tissue factor/ellagic acid-triggered thrombin generation assays. Co-presence of emicizumab increased peak thrombin values (PeakTh) dependent on PS, AT, and PC concentrations. Maximum coagulation potentials in the PS-reduced HA model plasmas remained normal in the presence of emicizumab. PeakTh were close to normal in the presence of 50%AT irrespective of emicizumab, but were higher than normal in the presence of 25%AT. Addition of recombinant FVIIa (corresponding to an administered dose of 90 μg/kg) enhanced coagulation potential to normal levels. Our findings provide novel information on hemostatic regulation in emicizumab-treated PwHA with a possible thrombophilic disposition.

[Methodological recommendations for surgical care in patients with hemophilia A receiving prophylactic therapy with emicizumab]

Methodological recommendations for surgical care in patients with hemophilia A receiving prophylactic therapy with emicizumab. Recommendations of the expert group. Moscow, 2024.

Surgical Experience from the STASEY Study of Emicizumab Prophylaxis in People with Hemophilia A with Factor VIII Inhibitors

Background  Guidelines surrounding emicizumab prophylaxis and perioperative treatment for people with hemophilia A (PwHA) with factor (F)VIII inhibitors undergoing surgeries are limited. The phase IIIb multicenter, single-arm STASEY study evaluated safety and tolerability of emicizumab prophylaxis in PwHA aged ≥12 years with FVIII inhibitors. This analysis assesses surgeries during study conduct, associated hemophilia medications, and postoperative bleeds (treated and untreated). Methods  PwHA with FVIII inhibitors received emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg/week for 4 weeks, then 1.5 mg/kg/week until 2 years. Surgeries were managed and documented by treating physicians. Bleeds and treatments were recorded by physicians and participants. Results  Forty-six participants had ≥1 on-study surgery, 37 underwent 56 minor surgeries, and 13 underwent 22 major surgeries. Four participants underwent both minor and major surgeries. Of 18 (81.8%) and 4 (18.2%) major surgeries managed with/without additional hemostatic medication, 33.3 and 25.0% were associated with a treated postoperative bleed, respectively. Of 24 (42.9%) and 32 (57.1%) minor surgeries managed with/without additional hemostatic medication, 15.6 and 25.0% were associated with a treated postoperative bleed, respectively. Recombinant activated FVII was the most common medication for prophylaxis and bleed treatment. There were no thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs). One hypertrophic clot, considered unrelated to emicizumab, occurred following tooth extraction. Conclusion  In this challenging population with a high bleeding risk, major surgeries were performed in PwHA receiving emicizumab with/without additional hemostatic medication. Postoperative bleeds occurred following 59.1% of major surgeries; 53.8% were treated. No arterial/venous thrombotic events or TMAs occurred due to concomitant emicizumab and bypassing agents. Trial registration  This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03191799).

Expert opinion paper on the treatment of hemophilia a with emicizumab

INTRODUCTION

Prophylaxis with emicizumab, a bispecific monoclonal antibody that mimics FVIII function, has shown encouraging results in clinical trials in terms of efficacy and safety. However, current experience is limited, and many areas of concern to clinicians have yet to be reviewed.

AREAS COVERED

This paper reviews the experience of hemophilia A patients treated with emicizumab based on the results of clinical trials and real-life studies. The authors place special emphasis on issues such as the management of these patients in situations of hemorrhage and/or surgical interventions, joint health or laboratory monitoring.

EXPERT OPINION

Treatment with emicizumab has been shown to improve joint health and reduce bleeding, of particular interest to patients with inhibitors and high bleeding rates. However, there are still concerns about its administration in neonates and previously untreated patients due to limited reported experience. Laboratory monitoring is not strictly necessary due to the stable pharmacokinetics emicizumab has been shown to exhibit, however, tests that globally assess hemostasis may be useful especially in cases of bleeding or surgery. The authors are also of the opinion that prophylaxis before minor surgery is not necessary and that major surgeries can be safely performed with additional prophylactic coagulation factor.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04431726..

Management and Outcomes of Invasive Procedures in Individuals with Hemophilia A on Emicizumab Prophylaxis: A Single Center Experience

Prophylactic treatment with emicizumab has become an important and effective bleeding prevention for people with hemophilia A (PwHA). Perioperative management of PwHA using emicizumab prophylaxis is still challenging due to a lack of experience. Medical records of perioperative management and outcomes were reviewed, and data were collected for adult PwHA receiving emicizumab and undergoing surgical procedures between August 2019 and July 2022 at the University Medical Center Ljubljana. Twelve surgical procedures were performed in eight PwHA (one with FVIII inhibitors) while on emicizumab prophylaxis. Three minor procedures included cataract surgery, cystoscopic lithotripsy, and percutaneous coronary intervention. Nine major surgeries included four osteosyntheses, necrectomy of chronic osteomyelitis with new ankle arthrodesis, two below-knee amputations, total knee replacement, and placement of ventriculostomy after a spontaneous intraventricular hemorrhage. No major bleeds, thrombotic events or deaths, or new inhibitors appeared. Our real-world experience demonstrates that minor and major surgeries can be performed safely in PwHA on emicizumab prophylaxis. Additional data are needed to optimize dosing/duration of additional hemostatic agents in diverse invasive procedures and complex clinical situations.

Management of surgery in persons with hemophilia A receiving emicizumab prophylaxis: data from a national hemophilia treatment center

Background

Persons with hemophilia A may require surgical procedures. Real-world data on invasive procedures in persons with hemophilia A receiving emicizumab prophylaxis are limited.

Objectives

To evaluate the safety of invasive procedures in persons with hemophilia A receiving emicizumab prophylaxis and their outcomes in a longitudinally followed cohort.

Methods

Data from medical records of persons with hemophilia A with and without factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors longitudinally followed at our tertiary center, who received emicizumab prophylaxis and underwent all types of invasive procedures, were retrieved. Outcomes of interest were bleeding and thrombotic complications.

Results

Overall, 35 patients underwent 56 invasive procedures, 18 (32.1%) were major. The median age was 36.3 years (IQR, 8.8-55.9 years); 12 patients (34.3%) were younger than 18 years at the time of procedure; 17 (48.6%) were patients with FVIII inhibitors. Among major procedures, orthopedic surgeries prevailed. All patients who underwent major procedures received factor replacement with either recombinant activated factor VII (patients with inhibitors) or FVIII (patients without inhibitors). Factor concentrates were administered prior to 32 (84.2%) of the minor procedures. Repeated doses were given according to international expert opinion recommendations and patients' condition.There were 7 bleeding events in 6 patients, 5 were major bleeds, including 1 patient who underwent a minor procedure without factor replacement. None of the patients experienced a thrombotic complication.

Conclusion

Invasive procedures can be performed safely in patients receiving emicizumab prophylaxis with close surveillance after surgery. Factor concentrates may be advised in selected patients undergoing minor procedures.

Antithrombotic Treatment in Patients With Hemophilia: an EHA-ISTH-EAHAD-ESO Clinical Practice Guidance

Cardiovascular disease is an emerging medical issue in patients with hemophilia (PWH) and its prevalence is increasing up to 15% in PWH in the United States. Atrial fibrillation, acute and chronic coronary syndromes, venous thromboembolism, and cerebral thrombosis are frequent thrombotic or prothrombotic situations, which require a careful approach to fine-tune the delicate balance between thrombosis and hemostasis in PWH when using both procoagulant and anticoagulant treatments. Generally, PWH could be considered as being naturally anticoagulated when clotting factors are <20 IU/dL, but specific recommendations in patients with very low levels according to the different clinical situations are lacking and mainly based on the anecdotal series. For PWH with baseline clotting factor levels >20 IU/dL in need for any form of antithrombotic therapy, usually treatment without additional clotting factor prophylaxis could be used, but careful monitoring for bleeding is recommended. For antiplatelet treatment, this threshold could be lower with single-antiplatelet agent, but again factor level should be at least 20 IU/dL for dual antiplatelet treatment. In this complex growing scenario, the European Hematology Association in collaboration with the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, the European Association for Hemophilia and Allied Disorders, the European Stroke Organization, and a representative of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Thrombosis has produced this current guidance document to provide clinical practice recommendations for health care providers who care for PWH.

A real-world evidence analysis of the impact of switching from factor VIII to emicizumab prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia A without inhibitors

BACKGROUND

This study retrospectively compared annualized billed bleed rates (ABR_b) in people with hemophilia A (PwHA) without inhibitors who switched from factor VIII (FVIII) prophylaxis to emicizumab.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A real-world comparison study was performed on the effect of switching from FVIII to emicizumab prophylaxis in male, non-inhibitor patients on ABR_b using an all-payer claims database (APCD) dataset from 1 January 2014, to 31 March 2021. The identification period was from 1 November 2017, to 30 September 2020.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-one patients were included with a total of 82 and 45 bleeds in the pre- and post-switch periods, respectively. The average follow-up period pre-switch was 978.37 days (SD 555.03), whereas the average follow-up period post-switch was 522.26 days (SD 191.36). No significant differences in mean ABR_b were observed pre-/post-switch (0.25 and 0.20, respectively; P = 0.4456).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrate no significant reduction in ABR_b, suggesting that switching from FVIII to emicizumab may not deliver incremental benefits to PwHA receiving prophylactic care.

Impact of switching prophylaxis treatment from factor VIII to emicizumab in hemophilia A patients without inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Factor VIII (FVIII) replacement and emicizumab are effective at preventing bleeds in patients with hemophilia A (HA). Though benefits of emicizumab among inhibitor patients with HA (PwHA) are well established, more real-world evidence among non-inhibitor patients is needed.

METHODS

Using a United States healthcare claims database, we compared billed annualized bleed rates (ABR_b) and the total cost of care (TCC) before and after switching from FVIII prophylaxis to emicizumab among non-inhibitor male PwHA. Bayesian inferences were used to assess the difference in ABR_b and TCC per patient per year (PPPY) pre versus post prophylaxis switch. We included 101 non-inhibitor male PwHA aged between 3 and 63 years old who switched from FVIII prophylaxis to emicizumab prophylaxis in 2018 or 2019.

RESULTS

The ABR_b increased from 0.52 to 0.62 (p = 0.83) after switch. The posterior probability of the mean ABR_b increasing after the switch was 75.54%. The TCC PPPY increased from $517,143 to $627,005 (p < 0.0001) after switch and the posterior probability of mean costs increasing after the switch was 99.80%.

CONCLUSIONS

Personalization of care through the identification of the most appropriate therapy for each patient can optimize clinical and economic outcomes. Future real-world evidence research could help establish the value of prophylactic options in targeted populations such as the non-inhibitor male PwHA.

Safe and Successful Surgical Outcome in Persons with Hemophilia A with and without Inhibitors Treated with Emicizumab: A Large, Single Center, Real-World Experience

Emicizumab is a humanized recombinant bispecific antibody, bridging together activated factor IX (FIXa) and factor X (FX), thus mimicking the activity of FVIII in vivo. Emicizumab is designed for long-term prophylaxis in patients with severe hemophilia A with and without inhibitors. This approach provides constant protection, with significant reduction in bleeding rate and improved quality of life. However, protection provided by emicizumab is not absolute, and clotting factor concentrates (FVIII, rFVIIa, aPCC) may be necessary for post-traumatic bleeding or surgery, with a potential thrombotic risk or difficulty in preventing bleeding. Real world evidence is still scanty, especially for managing major surgery. In this study, 75 surgeries were managed in 28 patients (27 major procedures in 15 patients and 48 minor procedures in 20 patients. In 17 patients without inhibitors, 30 minor surgeries were carried out by using FVIII in 5, with only a bleeding event, which was successfully treated with FVIII concentrate. Six major surgeries were uneventfully performed with FVIII concentrate. Eleven PWHA and high-titer inhibitors underwent 39 surgical procedures (18 minor and 21 major surgeries). Minor surgeries were mostly performed without prophylaxis with rFVIIa, with only a single bleeding complication. All 21 major surgeries were covered with a homogeneous protocol using rFVIIa. In four instances, bleeding complications occurred, treated with rFVIIa. Of them, a single patient only failed to respond and died because of an uncontrollable bleeding from a large ruptured retroperitoneal pseudotumor. Surgery in patients with emicizumab can be safely carried out with the use of appropriate replacement therapy protocols.

Economic Evaluation of Immune Tolerance Induction in Children With Severe Hemophilia A and High-Responding Inhibitors: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prophylaxis With Emicizumab

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to measure the cost-effectiveness of prophylaxis with emicizumab in PsHAhri on ITI in Brazil.

METHODS

A cost-effectiveness modeling analysis was used to estimate the costs per PsHAhri on ITI and the number of prevented bleedings from undertaking one intervention (prophylaxis with BpA) over another (prophylaxis with emicizumab), based on the Brazilian Ministry of Health perspective. Costs of ITI with recombinant FVIII, prophylaxis with BpA or emicizumab, and treated bleeding episodes with BpA costs were evaluated for PsHAhri who had ITI success or failure. This study was conducted with the perspective of the Brazilian Ministry of Health (payer).

RESULTS

During ITI, prophylaxis with BpA cost US $924 666/PsHAhri/ITI, whereas prophylaxis with emicizumab cost US $488 785/PsHAhri/ITI. During ITI, there was an average of 9.32 bleeding episodes/PsHAhri/ITI when BpA were used as prophylaxis and 0.67 bleeding/PsHAhri/ITI when emicizumab was used. By univariate deterministic sensitivity analysis, emicizumab remained dominant whichever variable was modified.

CONCLUSION

In this study, prophylaxis with emicizumab during ITI is a dominant option compared with prophylaxis with BpA during ITI.

Efficacy of emicizumab is maintained throughout dosing intervals for bleed prophylaxis

Background

Across the HAVEN clinical trial program, the efficacy of emicizumab has been demonstrated in children, adolescents, and adults with hemophilia A, with or without factor VIII inhibitors. After the 4-week loading dose period, emicizumab concentrations are expected to remain at levels that provide bleed protection throughout the entire dosing interval, regardless of the chosen maintenance dosing regimen, ie, weekly, every 2 weeks, or every 4 weeks.

Objectives

The objective of this study was to examine the timing of treated bleeds within the dosing intervals for emicizumab administered during the HAVEN 1 to 4 studies.

Methods

In this post hoc analysis, we pooled data from all the participants of the HAVEN 1 to 4 studies and analyzed the timing of treated bleeds in relation to the emicizumab dose.

Results

A total of 392 participants were included in this analysis, with a median (range) age of 28.0 years (1.1-77.0 years). Target joints were identified in 237 of 392 (60.5%) participants before the study entry. Overall, 211 of 392 (53.8%) participants experienced 907 treated bleeding events. The total mean (SD) annualized bleeding rate across the 4 studies was 1.6 (5.9). There was no evidence that bleeding events clustered on any 1 particular day in any dosing schedule from HAVEN 1 to 4 (P > .05 for all 3 treatment regimens).

Conclusion

Data from the HAVEN 1 to 4 trials show consistent bleed prevention within the dosing interval, regardless of the dosing regimen chosen. These findings provide further evidence of the sustained efficacy of emicizumab across all approved dosing regimens to reduce bleeding in people with hemophilia A.

Management of children with hemophilia A on emicizumab who need surgery

The introduction of emicizumab into the treatment regime of persons with hemophilia A has dramatically reduced frequency of bleeding in patients with and without inhibitors. However, in children with Hemophilia A (CwHA) who require surgical or other invasive procedures, additional treatment with factor replacement or other hemostatic agents may still be needed to prevent intraoperative or postoperative bleeding. This review will look at the reported outcomes in CwHA on emicizumab who have had surgery and propose recommendations for the best perioperative management of major and minor procedures.

Two pediatric cases of severe hemophilia A in which emicizumab prophylaxis failed to prevent traumatic extra-articular hemorrhage

Emicizumab reduces bleeding episodes in patients with severe hemophilia A (PwHA). Little information is available on hemostatic management of severe traumatic hemorrhages in emicizumab-treated pediatric PwHA. We assessed therapeutic efficacy and global coagulation potentials in two pediatric cases of emicizumab-treated pediatric PwHA with intracranial or retroperitoneal/iliopsoas hemorrhage. A modified clot waveform analysis (CWA) triggered by mixtures of tissue factor and ellagic acid was used to assess coagulant potentials, and maximum coagulant velocity (Ad|min1|) was calculated. One patient with intracranial hemorrhage was treated with continuous infusions of recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) at a dose of 4-4.6 IU/kg/hr for 9 days, followed by bolus infusion at 66 IU/kg/day for 2 days and 33 IU/kg/day for an additional 2 days. The Ad|min1| was increased from 5.5 (at baseline) to 7.0-8.1 under concomitant treatment and maintained within or near normal range (IQR; 6.9-7.7). The other patient with retroperitoneal/iliopsoas hemorrhage received bolus infusions of rFVIII at 50 IU/kg/day for 20 days and every-other-day infusion of rFVIII for 8 days. The Ad|min1| was increased from 5.2 (at baseline) to 5.8-6.8 under concomitant treatment and maintained within the normal range. We successfully managed a treatment plan for severe traumatic bleeding in emicizumab-treated pediatric PwHA using modified CWA.

Emicizumab: a novel drug in hemophilia A prophylaxis - a narrative review

INTRODUCTION

Hemophilia A is a genetically conditioned disease leading to hemostatic disorders due to factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency. The treatment of hemophilia has evolved throughout the past years and has significantly changed. One of the newest drugs for prophylactic treatment is the humanized bispecific IgG antibody - emicizumab, which binds with factor IXa and factor X, bridging those factors and thus mimicking the activity of factor VIII.

AREAS COVERED

The literature search was made via PubMed database, with the emphasis on clinical trials and case reports, describing the off-label emicizumab use. This review presents an extensive summary and considers advantages and disadvantages (side-effects) of emicizumab, describing additional clinical situations, where emicizumab has been successfully used. In our review we cover information about the mechanisms of action, indications, efficacy and discuss some chosen case reports about off-label emicizumab use.

EXPERT OPINION

Its convenient administration method (subcutaneous) and frequency of injections (from once a week to once a month) makes it a more comfortable treatment, limiting injection-site reactions, hospital stays, costs of prophylaxis, and significantly increasing patients' quality of life. Adverse effects are scarce and rarely serious - the most common ones are reactions at the injection-site and upper respiratory tract infections.

A real-world study comparing pre-post billed annualized bleed rates and total cost of care among non-inhibitor patients with hemophilia A switching from FVIII prophylaxis to emicizumab

OBJECTIVE

Factor VIII (FVIII) replacement and emicizumab have demonstrated efficacy for prevention of bleeds among patients with hemophilia A (PwHA) compared to on-demand (OD) use. Evidence investigating clinical outcomes and healthcare costs of non-inhibitor PwHA switching from prophylaxis with FVIII concentrates to emicizumab has not been well-established within large real-world datasets. This study aimed to investigate billed annualized bleed rates (ABR_b) and total cost of care (TCC) among non-inhibitor PwHA switching from FVIII-prophylaxis to emicizumab-prophylaxis.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational study was conducted using IQVIA PharMetrics Plus, a US administrative claims database. The date of first claim for emicizumab was defined as the index date. OD patients and inhibitor patients were excluded. Bleeds were identified using a list of 535 diagnosis codes. Bayesian models were developed to estimate the probability ABR_b worsens and TCC increases after switching to emicizumab. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to test statistical significance of changes in ABR_b and TCC after switch.

RESULTS

Among the 121 identified patients, the difference in mean ABR_b between FVIII-prophylaxis (0.68 [SD = 1.28]) and emicizumab (0.55 [SD = 1.48]) was insignificant (p = .142). The mean annual TCC significantly increased for patients switching from FVIII-prophylaxis ($518,151 [SD = $289,934]) to emicizumab ($652,679 [SD = $340,126]; p < .0001). The Bayesian models estimated a 21.0% probability of the ABR_b worsening and a 99.9% probability of increasing TCC after switch.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that in male non-inhibitor PwHA, switching from FVIII prophylaxis to emicizumab incurs substantial cost increase with no significant benefit in ABR_b. This evidence may help guide providers, payers, and patients in shared decision-making conversations around best treatment options.

Surgical outcomes in people with hemophilia A taking emicizumab prophylaxis: experience from the HAVEN 1-4 studies

Many people with hemophilia A (PwHA) undergo surgery in their lifetime, often because of complications of their disease. Emicizumab is the first bispecific monoclonal antibody prophylactic therapy for PwHA, and its efficacy and safety have been previously demonstrated; however, there is a need to build an evidence base on the management of PwHA on emicizumab undergoing surgery. Data from the HAVEN 1-4 phase 3 clinical trials were pooled to provide a summary of all minor and major surgeries in PwHA with or without factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors who were receiving emicizumab prophylaxis. Overall, 233 surgeries were carried out during the HAVEN 1-4 trials: 215 minor surgeries (including minor dental and joint procedures, central venous access device placement or removal, and endoscopies) in 115 PwHA (64 with FVIII inhibitors) and 18 major surgeries (including arthroplasty and synovectomy) in 18 PwHA (10 with FVIII inhibitors). Perioperative hemostatic support was at the discretion of the treating physician. Overall, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 33.5 (13.0-49.0) years and the median (IQR) emicizumab exposure time before surgery was 278.0 (177.0-431.0) days. Among the 215 minor surgeries, 141 (65.6%) were managed without additional prophylactic factor concentrate, and of those, 121 (85.8%) were not associated with a postoperative bleed. The majority (15 of 18 [83.3%]) of major surgeries were managed with additional prophylactic factor concentrate. Twelve (80.0%) of these 15 surgeries were associated with no intraoperative or postoperative bleeds. The data demonstrate that minor and major surgeries can be performed safely in PwHA receiving emicizumab prophylaxis. These trials are registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02622321, #NCT02795767, #NCT02847637, and #NCT03020160.

Past, present and future of orthopedic surgery in hemophilia: looking to a world without bleeding and arthropathy in the near future

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this article is to review the literature on orthopedic surgery in people with hemophilia (PWH), to better understand its past and present and attempt to predict the future.

AREAS COVERED

A Cochrane Library and PubMed (MEDLINE) search of studies related to orthopedic surgery in PWH was analyzed. A downward trend in orthopedic surgery in PWH has been observed. Patients on continuous prophylaxis are less likely to require orthopedic surgery. In patients with hemophilia, the risk of major bleeding remains high after total joint arthroplasty, even with factor replacement. Cases of acute compartment syndrome, pseudotumors and even limb amputations are still observed in PWH.

EXPERT OPINION

Orthopedic surgery for PWH should always be performed in specialized centers with multidisciplinary expertise in the correct management of hemophilia. It is paramount to perform an accurate preoperative coagulation screening before surgery. The availability of prophylaxis through replacement and the recent non-replacement therapy in the well-developed countries will diminish substantially or hopefully abolish completely the need for surgery in the treatment of PWH. Therefore, we are looking to a world without bleeding and arthropathy in the next future. Unfortunately, this is not true for the under-development countries.

The important impact of dental care on haemostatic treatment burden in patients with mild haemophilia

BACKGROUND

Mild haemophilia (MH) is mainly characterized by haemorrhages secondary to surgery/invasive procedures or trauma. Haemostatic treatment in MH ranges from on demand to short prophylaxis according to the type of bleeding events and the basal clotting factor level. Oral surgery and dental extractions can represent a frequent haemostatic challenge in MH requiring appropriate treatment. However, only few studies on limited numbers of patients are available in the literature regarding the implications of dental management in patients with MH.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of dental care on the burden of haemostatic treatment in patients affected by MH.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective multicentre study evaluating adult patients with MH regularly examined at the Haemophilia Treatment Centres (HTCs) of the Saint-Luc University Hospital, Brussels (Belgium) and of Paolo Giaccone Hospital, Palermo (Italy). The population consisted of 107 male patients with MH, with a mean age of 39 years (range 18-81 years).

RESULTS

The majority of patients (86/107, 79%) needed at least one treatment within the study period, and 44% (38/86) of them received haemostatic therapy for dental care. Haemostatic therapy in our study varied from antifibrinolytic therapy alone and perioperative factor replacement to the absence of treatment at all. The great majority of oral interventions (27/42, 64%) were managed with clotting factor concentrate.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that dental care currently represents a major reason for haemostatic treatments in patients with MH. Maintaining good oral health appears as a priority to minimize avoidable replacement therapy and optimize resources.

The neurosurgical management of Severe Hemophilia A and Moyamoya (SHAM): challenges, strategies, and literature review

INTRODUCTION

Severe Hemophilia A and Moyamoya arteriopathy (SHAM syndrome) is a rare genetic disorder caused by deletion of portions of the cytogenic band Xq28. A case of SHAM syndrome requiring bilateral cerebral revascularization is described with an emphasis on perioperative management.

CASE REPORT

A 5-year-old boy with severe hemophilia A complicated by factor VIII inhibition presented with right-sided weakness. Imaging revealed multiple strokes and vascular changes consistent with Moyamoya disease. The patient underwent two-staged indirect cerebral bypass revascularizations, first on the left side and several months later on the right. Perioperative management required balancing the administration of agents to prevent coagulopathy and perioperative hemorrhage while mitigating the risk of thromboembolic events associated with bypass surgery. Despite a multidisciplinary effort by the neurosurgery, hematology, critical care, and anesthesiology teams, the post-operative course after both surgeries was complicated by stroke. Fortunately, the patient recovered rapidly to his preoperative functional baseline.

CONCLUSION

We describe a rare case of SHAM syndrome in a pediatric patient who required bilateral revascularizations and discuss strategies for managing the perioperative risk of hemorrhage and stroke. We also review existing literature on SHAM syndrome.

Into a brave new world: Haemophilia A & von Willebrand Disease Surgery with novel therapies

INTRODUCTION

Haemophilia & von Willebrand disease are both recognised inherited bleeding disorders. With increased access to highly efficient and safe replacement and novel therapies, management of surgical interventions in this group can be safely managed by experienced multidisciplinary teams.

AIM

To review the evidence for managing surgery in the era of novel therapies.

METHOD

We explore four cases and establish the role of the clinical nurse specialist within the surgical pathway.

RESULTS

All of these cases evidence the continued important role of both the multidisciplinary planning prior to any surgical interventions in people with bleeding disorders and the key role of the Nurse Specialist in ensuring this plan is then implemented. Key focuses of communication with all parties involved in the patient journey, performing education for the patient, family and wider healthcare team about the underlying bleeding disorder and the importance of time critical medicines being given on time is essential.

CONCLUSION

These cases demonstrate that individuals with bleeding disorders are at risk of developing other rare conditions alongside their life long condition, in addition to comorbidities associated with ageing. Evidence for rare plus rare is likely to be minimal as demonstrated within the cases, and recognition of how to reach out to international peers in the field is important. Sharing complex case management at national & international meetings and in publication has never been so important.

Managing invasive procedures in haemophilia patients with limited resources, extended half-life concentrates or non-replacement therapies in 2022

New treatment possibilities and modalities are now available globally for patients with haemophilia requiring surgery or invasive procedures. The first is the appropriate application of low-dose protocols of clotting factor concentrates (CFC) achieving adequate perioperative haemostasis in resources constraint environments. The increasing availability of CFC through humanitarian aid programs allows more invasive surgeries to be performed for which efficacy and safety data should be more widely collected and reported. Second, extended half-life CFC that are increasingly available in many countries represent valuable alternatives to standard half-life products in surgical patients allowing reduced number of infusions and lower consumption, in particular for extended half-life factor IX. Third, in the era of recently introduced nonfactor prophylaxis, some minor surgical procedures can now be performed without additional haemostatic treatment, others with few low-dose administrations of CFC or bypassing agents. Additional factor VIII/IX or recombinant activated factor VII has proven to be safe and effective in association with emicizumab for major surgeries and it was effectively given at low doses in association with fitusiran (including activated prothrombin complex concentrate). No thrombotic complications have been reported in the surgical setting so far. A multidisciplinary team/facility remains crucial to manage major surgery in patients on prophylaxis with these new agents.

Comparisons of global coagulation potential and bleeding episodes in emicizumab-treated hemophilia A patients and mild hemophilia A patients

Emicizumab reduces bleeding events in patients with severe hemophilia A (HA). The coagulation potential of emicizumab at a clinical dose appears to correspond to about 15 IU/dL of factor VIII activity (FVIII:C), the equivalent of converting from a severe to mild phenotype. However, the clinical and laboratory characteristics of HA patients receiving emicizumab (Emi-PwHA) compared with patients with mild HA (PwMHA) remain to be determined. We reviewed clinical data from Emi-PwHA (n = 63) and PwMHA (n = 15) and evaluated comprehensive coagulation function using Ca²⁺-triggered rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and ellagic acid/tissue factor-triggered clot waveform analysis (modified CWA). The median FVIII:C in PwMHA was 13.0 (IQR 8.5-17.0) IU/dL. Bleeding patterns in both groups were similar and classified into three categories: (1) spontaneous bleeding, post-traumatic, (2) bleeding within 1-2 days, and (3) delayed bleeding after 1-2 weeks. The coagulation potential in Emi-PwHA with and without breakthrough bleeds was comparable. Furthermore, coagulation function in Emi-PwHA was equivalent to PwMHA, although time between treatment and hospitalization for breakthrough bleeds in PwMHA appeared to be longer than those in Emi-PwHA. The coagulation potential and bleeding patterns appeared to be similar in Emi-PwHA and PwMHA, indicating that emicizumab-driven coagulation potential reflected mild HA.

Emicizumab in pediatric hemophilia: Bleeding and surgical outcomes from a single-center retrospective study

Real-world data describing emicizumab prophylaxis in pediatric hemophilia A is limited with current literature providing a heterogenous approach to procedural management. We performed a retrospective review on the 28 patients who have been treated with emicizumab prophylaxis at Texas Children's Hospital from 2018 to 2021. After starting emicizumab, the mean annualized bleeding rate reduced from 3.61 to 0.44. Seven surgical procedures were performed in the cohort, and all treated with pre- and postoperative factor replacement resulting in one minor bleeding event. We demonstrate a successful experience with emicizumab prophylaxis and safe perioperative approach with a focus on minimizing postoperative bleeding.

An update of the current pharmacotherapeutic armamentarium for hemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

For several decades, we have seen unprecedented advances in novel therapy development for hemophilia A. These advances address the unmet need of replacement therapy, and they include the development of recombinant products with improved pharmacokinetics, subcutaneously administered products, and those with better efficacy and safety profiles in hemophilia A management.

AREAS COVERED

In this update of hemophilia A treatment, the author summarizes data from completed standard half-life FVIII products, extended half-life FVIII products and FVIII mimetic studies. All products have an acceptable safety profile. The standard half-life products, EHL-FVIII products and emicizumab are efficacious in the prevention and treatment of bleeds and for EHL-FVIII in the perisurgical setting.

EXPERT OPINION

Advances in pharmacotherapy for hemophilia A have been characterized by changing care goals from supportive care to eliminating infections, preventing inhibitors, and more recently achieving zero bleeds in many patients. While gene therapy has the potential for functional cure in hemophilia A, it has many limitations which need to be addressed. Therefore, pharmacotherapy is likely to remain the mainstay in the management of hemophilia A and promises to get better with currently available therapies. Evolving factor and non-factor replacement therapies may also improve current unmet needs in hemophilia A management.

Adoption of emicizumab (Hemlibra®) for hemophilia A in Europe: Data from the 2020 European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders survey

BACKGROUND

Emicizumab, a bispecific monoclonal antibody administered subcutaneously, mimicking the action of activated coagulation factor VIII, has been approved in Europe for use in patients with severe hemophilia of all ages.

AIMS

To assess availability, acceptance, adverse events, efficacy and laboratory monitoring of emicizumab and the effect of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on its use.

METHODS

Online questionnaire sent to 144 hemophilia treatment centres (November 2020 to January 2021).

RESULTS

Forty-six physicians from 21 countries responded, with a total of 3420 patients with severe HA under their care. Emicizumab was widely available, for 100% of inhibitor patients and 88% of non-inhibitor patients. No major adverse events were reported. Four reported deaths in patients on emicizumab were not thought to be related to emicizumab. An annualized bleeding rate (ABR) of zero was achieved in 73% of inhibitors patients. Haemostasis was satisfactory in the majority of minor (93.7%) and major (90.7%) surgical procedures performed while on emicizumab. Inhibitor titers were monitored in 78.4% of inhibitor patients on emicizumab, but chromogenic FVIII assay was only available in 73% of centres. The COVID-19 pandemic did not have a major impact on the adoption of emicizumab in most centres (64.9%).

CONCLUSION

Three years after its rollout in Europe, emicizumab is widely available. Clinical efficacy and safety were evaluated to be very good, keeping in mind the inherent limitations of the study. Unmet needs include establishment of treatment guidelines for surgery and breakthrough bleeding, limited expertise, especially in young children, and availability of laboratory assays.

Haemophilia

Haemophilia A and B are rare congenital, recessive X-linked disorders caused by lack or deficiency of clotting factor VIII (FVIII) or IX (FIX), respectively. The severity of the disease depends on the reduction of levels of FVIII or FIX, which are determined by the type of the causative mutation in the genes encoding the factors (F8 and F9, respectively). The hallmark clinical characteristic, especially in untreated severe forms, is bleeding (spontaneous or after trauma) into major joints such as ankles, knees and elbows, which can result in the development of arthropathy. Intracranial bleeds and bleeds into internal organs may be life-threatening. The median life expectancy was ~30 years until the 1960s, but improved understanding of the disorder and development of efficacious therapy based on prophylactic replacement of the missing factor has caused a paradigm shift, and today individuals with haemophilia can look forward to a virtually normal life expectancy and quality of life. Nevertheless, the potential development of inhibitory antibodies to infused factor is still a major hurdle to overcome in a substantial proportion of patients. Finally, gene therapy for both types of haemophilia has progressed remarkably and could soon become a reality.