Tailored versus Triple plus Bismuth or Concomitant Therapy as Initial Helicobacter pylori Treatment: A Randomized Trial

Efficacy and Safety of Modified Bismuth Quadruple Therapy for First-Line Helicobacter pylori Eradication: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of adding bismuth to conventional triple therapy (modified bismuth quadruple therapy [mBQT]) for Helicobacter pylori treatment-naïve patients in an era of increasing eradication failure. We performed a comprehensive literature search up to December 2024 using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to investigate mBQT's benefits. The comparative treatments were as follows: (1) triple therapy without bismuth (TT), (2) non-BQTs (sequential and concomitant), and (3) classic BQT (cBQT) containing metronidazole and tetracycline. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were analyzed to compare eradication rates, adverse drug events, and patient compliance between the mBQT and comparison groups. In total, 9162 and 8449 patients from 43 trials in 35 RCTs were included in the intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses, respectively. The mBQT group had a superior pooled eradication rate compared to the TT group (84.8% vs. 74.1%, p < 0.00001, and odds ratio [OR] = 2.02 [1.61-2.55]). The mBQT showed a similar eradication rate to the non-BQT and cBQT groups (80.8% vs. 80.2%, p = 0.55, and OR = 1.09 [0.83-1.43] in the non-BQT group; 81.5% vs. 83.0%, p = 0.36, and OR = 0.84 [0.59-1.21] in the cBQT group). Regarding adverse drug events, there was no significant difference between the mBQT and comparison groups (25.4% vs. 27.5%, p = 0.53, and OR = 0.95 [0.80-1.12]). The subgroup analysis showed that patient adherence to mBQT was significantly higher than to cBQT (96.4% vs. 93.3%, p = 0.004, and OR = 1.83 [1.21-2.77]). Our meta-analysis showed that mBQT was an effective and tolerable first-line therapy for H. pylori eradication.

The Aging Stomach: Clinical Implications of H. pylori Infection in Older Adults-Challenges and Strategies for Improved Management

Aging is a multifactorial biological process characterized by a decline in physiological function and increasing susceptibility to various diseases, including malignancies and gastrointestinal disorders. Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is highly prevalent among older adults, particularly those in institutionalized settings, contributing to conditions such as atrophic gastritis, peptic ulcer disease, and gastric carcinoma. This review examines the intricate interplay between aging, gastrointestinal changes, and H. pylori pathogenesis. The age-associated decline in immune function, known as immunosenescence, exacerbates the challenges of managing H. pylori infection. Comorbidities and polypharmacy further increase the risk of adverse outcomes in older adults. Current clinical guidelines inadequately address the specific needs of the geriatric population, who are disproportionately affected by antibiotic resistance, heightened side effects, and diagnostic complexities. This review focuses on recent advancements in understanding H. pylori infection among older adults, including epidemiology, diagnostics, therapeutic strategies, and age-related gastric changes. Diagnostic approaches must consider the physiological changes that accompany aging, and treatment regimens need to be carefully tailored to balance efficacy and tolerability. Emerging strategies, such as novel eradication regimens and adjunctive probiotic therapies, show promise for improving treatment outcomes. However, significant knowledge gaps persist regarding the impact of aging on H. pylori pathogenesis and treatment efficacy. A multidisciplinary approach involving gastroenterologists, geriatricians, and other specialists is crucial to providing comprehensive care for this vulnerable population. Future research should focus on refining diagnostic and therapeutic protocols to bridge these gaps, ultimately enhancing clinical outcomes and reducing the burden of H. pylori-associated diseases in the aging population.

Comparison of vonoprazan bismuth-containing triple therapy with quadruple therapy in Helicobacter pylori-infected treatment-naive patients: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Helicobacter pylori infection is linked to various gastrointestinal conditions, such as chronic active gastritis, peptic ulcers, and gastric cancer. Traditional treatment options encounter difficulties due to antibiotic resistance and adverse effects. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the effectiveness of a new treatment plan that combines vonoprazan (VPZ), amoxicillin, and bismuth for the eradication of H. pylori.

METHODS

A total of 600 patients infected with H. pylori were recruited for this multicenter randomized controlled trial. Patients treated for H. pylori elimination were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive 14 days of vonoprazan-based triple therapy (vonoprazan + amoxicillin + bismuth, group A) or standard quadruple therapy (esomeprazole + clarithromycin + amoxicillin + bismuth, group B). Compliance and adverse effects were tracked through daily medication and side effect records. All patients underwent a 13C/14C-urea breath test 4 weeks after treatment completion.

RESULTS

Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses revealed no substantial differences in H. pylori eradication rates between groups A and B (ITT: 83.7% vs 83.2%; PP: 90.9% vs 89.7%). However, significant differences were observed in the assessment of side effects (13.7% vs 28.6%, P < 0.001). Specifically, group A had significantly fewer "bitter mouths" than group B did (3.7% vs 16.2%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Triple therapy comprising vonoprazan (20 mg), amoxicillin (750 mg), and bismuth potassium citrate (220 mg) achieved a PP eradication rate ≥90%, paralleling standard quadruple therapy, and had fewer adverse events and lower costs (¥306.8 vs ¥645.8) for treatment-naive patients.

Efficacy and safety of low-dose tetracycline, amoxicillin quadruple therapy in Helicobacter pylori infection: A retrospective single center study

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication rates have declined with the rise of antibiotic-resistant strains in recent years. Although highly effective with a low prevalence of resistance, standard dose tetracycline is associated with frequent adverse events. The efficacy and safety of low-dose tetracycline as part of tetracycline and amoxicillin-containing bismuth quadruple therapy are not well described.

AIM

To compare the efficacy and safety of low-dose compared to standard dose tetracycline with combined amoxicillin-containing bismuth quadruple therapy in patients with H. pylori infection.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with H. pylori infection receiving tetracycline, amoxicillin, proton pump inhibitor, and bismuth for 14 days at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital (1/2022-6/2023) were evaluated. The low-dose tetracycline group received tetracycline 500 mg twice daily (bid) while the standard dose group received 750 mg bid or 500 mg three times daily (tid). Primary endpoints were H. pylori eradication rate and treatment-related adverse events.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 218 patients was 48.7 ± 14.0 years, 120 (55%) were male, and 118 (54.1%) received treatment as primary therapy. Furthermore, 73 (33%) patients received low-dose tetracycline (500 mg bid) and 145 (67%) received standard dose tetracycline including 500 mg tid in 74 (33%) and 750 mg bid in 71 (33%). On intention-to-treat analysis, H. pylori eradication rates were 89% [95% confidence interval (CI): 82%-96%] in the 500 mg bid group, 82% (95%CI: 74%-91%) in the 500 mg tid group, and 79% (95%CI: 69%-89%) in the 750 mg bid group without a statistically significant difference (P = 0.25). The incidence of adverse events was lower in the low-dose compared to the standard dose group (12.3% vs 31.1% or 23.9%; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Low-dose tetracycline combined with amoxicillin quadruple therapy for 14 days achieved a high eradication rate and fewer adverse events compared to the standard dose tetracycline regimen in patients with H. pylori infection.

Culture-based susceptibility-guided tailored versus empirical concomitant therapy as first-line Helicobacter pylori treatment: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

With the increasing resistance to antimicrobial agents, susceptibility-guided tailored therapy has been emerging as an ideal strategy for Helicobacter pylori treatment. However, susceptibility-guided tailored therapy requires additional cost, time consumption, and invasive procedure (endoscopy) and its superiority over empirical quadruple therapy as the first-line H. pylori treatment remains unclear.

AIMS

To compare the efficacy of culture-based susceptibility-guided tailored versus empirical concomitant therapy as the first-line Helicobacter pylori treatment.

METHODS

This open-label, randomized trial was performed in four Korean institutions. A total of 312 Patients with H. pylori-positive culture test and naïve to treatment were randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to either culture-based susceptibility-guided tailored therapy (clarithromycin-based or metronidazole-based triple therapy for susceptible strains or bismuth quadruple therapy for dual-resistant strains, n = 234) or empirical concomitant therapy (n = 78) for 10 days. Eradication success was evaluated by 13C-urea breath test at least 4 weeks after treatment.

RESULTS

Prevalence of dual resistance to both clarithromycin and metronidazole was 8%. H. pylori eradication rates for tailored and concomitant groups were 84.2% and 83.3% by intention-to-treat analysis (p = 0.859), respectively, and 92.9% and 91.5% by per-protocol analysis, respectively (p = 0.702), which were comparable between the two groups. However, eradication rates for dual-resistant strains were significantly higher in the tailored group than in the concomitant group. All adverse events were grade 1 or 2 based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and the incidence was significantly lower in the tailored group. The proportion of patients discontinuing treatment for adverse events was comparable between the two groups (2.1% vs. 2.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

The culture-based susceptibility-guided tailored therapy failed to show superiority over the empirical concomitant therapy in terms of eradication rate. Based on these findings, the treatment choice in clinical practice would depend on the background rate of antimicrobial resistance, availability of resources and costs associated with culture and susceptibility testing.

Efficacy and safety of bismuth quadruple regimens containing minocycline and vonoprazan for eradication of Helicobacter pylori: Real-world evidence

Background and Aim

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of minocycline, vonoprazan, amoxicillin, and bismuth quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) treatment.

Methods

From August 2022 to May 2023, clinical data were collected from patients who received H. pylori eradication treatment at West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University. One group received the MVAB regimen (amoxicillin, minocycline, vonoprazan, and colloidal bismuth pectin), while another group received the FOAB regimen (amoxicillin, furazolidone, omeprazole, and colloidal bismuth pectin), both administered for 14 days. Follow-up assessments of safety and compliance were conducted within 1 week after treatment completion. One and a half months after treatment, the success of eradication was evaluated using the urea breath test.

Results

For the MVAB regimen as a first-line treatment, the eradication rate was 90.1% (127/141, 95% CI: 85.1-95.1%) in the ITT analysis and 93.4% (127/136, 95% CI: 89.2-97.6%) in the PP analysis as a first-line treatment. As a second-line treatment, the eradication rate was 91.3% (21/23, 95% CI: 78.8-103.8%) in both analyses. For the FOAB regimen as a first-line treatment, the eradication rate was 98.0% (50/51, 95% CI: 94.1-101.2%) in the ITT analysis and 100% (50/50, 95% CI: 100%) in the PP analysis. As a second-line treatment, the eradication rate was 100% (6/6, 95% CI: 100%) in both analyses. Moreover, there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups (MVAB regimen: 5.5% and FOAB regimen: 8.8%; P > 0.05).

Conclusions

The MVAB regimen could indeed be a viable alternative treatment option to conventional therapies.

Global research trends and hotspots of Helicobacter pylori eradication based on clinical trial registration platforms: A cross-sectional analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to obtain an overview of clinical trials on Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication and analyze the global trends and hotspots in this field.

METHODS

We collected the data from clinical trials focused on H. pylori eradication in the primary clinical trial registries from 2000 to 2022 in the world. Then we analyzed the research trends and hotspots in H. pylori eradication regimens in different regions at different periods.

RESULTS

A total of 780 clinical trials were included, which were mainly conducted in Asia (682), followed by Europe (59), Africa (20), North America (16), South America (7), Oceania (2). The most active countries were China (343), Iran (140), South Korea (63), and Japan (73). "Bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BQT)" was the most studied regimen (159, 20.38 %). Additionally, clinical trials focused on potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs)-based therapy, probiotics, and high-dose dual therapy (HDDT) were constantly increasing. BQT received the most attention in China (26.53 %) and Iran (22.14 %), while it was tailored therapy in South Korea (23.29 %). P-CABs-based therapy was the main reseach hotspot in Japan (61.90 %).

CONCLUSION

How to eradicate H. pylori infection has been a heated research topic. BQT, P-CABs-based therapy, probiotics, and HDDT attracted the most attention in recent years.

Optimizing Helicobacter pylori Treatment: An Updated Review of Empirical and Susceptibility Test-Based Treatments

As the rate of discovery of drug-resistant Helicobacter pylori cases increases worldwide, the relevant societies have updated their guidelines for primary eradication regimens. A promising strategy against drug-resistant H. pylori is tailored therapy based on the results of an antibiotic susceptibility test; however, it is difficult to apply this strategy to all cases. Although culture-based antibiotic susceptibility tests can assess resistance to any antimicrobial agent, their greatest disadvantage is the time required to draw a conclusion. In contrast, molecular-based methods, such as polymerase chain reaction, can rapidly determine the presence of resistance, although a single test can only test for one type of antimicrobial agent. Additionally, the limited availability of facilities for molecular-based methods has hindered their widespread use. Therefore, low-cost, minimally invasive, simple, and effective primary regimens are needed. Several studies have compared the efficacy of the latest primary eradication regimens against that of tailored therapies, and their results have shaped guidelines. This article reviews the latest research on empirical and tailored treatments for H. pylori infections. Evidence for the superiority of tailored therapy over empirical therapy is still limited and varies by region and treatment regimen. A network meta-analysis comparing different empirical treatment regimens showed that vonoprazan triple therapy provides a superior eradication effect. Recently, favorable results towards vonoprazan dual therapy have been reported, as it reached eradication levels similar to those of vonoprazan triple therapy. Both vonoprazan dual therapy and tailored therapy based on antibiotic susceptibility tests could contribute to future treatment strategies.

Eradication rates of Helicobacter pylori in treatment-naive patients following 14-day vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy: A multicenter randomized controlled trial in China

BACKGROUND

Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CAB) are recommended for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infections, but dual therapy of P-CAB with amoxicillin has been poorly studied. The current study compared the efficacy, adverse reactions, compliance, and effects on gut microbiota of 14-day vonoprazan-amoxicillin (VA) dual therapy with esomeprazole, bismuth potassium citrate, amoxicillin, and metronidazole (EBAM) quadruple therapy in treatment-naive patients with H. pylori.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter, open-label, randomized, and controlled, non-inferiority study. Patients (n = 194) enrolled from six centers were randomly divided into either the VA or EBAM group. H. pylori eradication was determined using ¹³ C urea breath tests (UBT) 4-6 weeks post-treatment. Fecal samples were collected, and gut microbial populations were analyzed by 16S rDNA and metagenomic sequencing technology.

RESULTS

Eradication rates of H. pylori in the VA and EBAM groups were 88.7% and 91.8%, respectively, according to intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis; 95.6% and 96.7% with per-protocol (PP) analysis; and 94.5% and 96.7% with modified ITT (mITT) analysis (all p > 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the VA group was significantly lower compared to the EBAM group, and compliance within both groups was good. There was no difference in α-diversity or microbial composition in the VA and EBAM groups at one-month post-treatment compared to baseline, except for a markedly reduced abundance of Bacteroides in the EBAM group.

CONCLUSION

VA therapy achieved excellent eradication rates with low adverse reactions, good compliance, and little impact on gut microbiota. VA therapy should be recommended as a first-line treatment against H. pylori.

Bismuth, esomeprazole, metronidazole, and minocycline or tetracycline as a first-line regimen for Helicobacter pylori eradication: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Given the general unavailability, common adverse effects, and complicated administration of tetracycline, the clinical application of classic bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT) is greatly limited. Whether minocycline can replace tetracycline for Helicobacter pylori ( H . pylori ) eradication is unknown. We aimed to compare the eradication rate, safety, and compliance between minocycline- and tetracycline-containing BQT as first-line regimens.

METHODS

This randomized controlled trial was conducted on 434 naïve patients with H . pylori infection. The participants were randomly assigned to 14-day minocycline-containing BQT group (bismuth potassium citrate 110 mg q.i.d., esomeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., metronidazole 400 mg q.i.d., and minocycline 100 mg b.i.d.) and tetracycline-containing BQT group (bismuth potassium citrate/esomeprazole/metronidazole with doses same as above and tetracycline 500 mg q.i.d.). Safety and compliance were assessed within 3 days after eradication. Urea breath test was performed at 4-8 weeks after eradication to evaluate outcome. We used a noninferiority test to compare the eradication rates of the two groups. The intergroup differences were evaluated using Pearson chi-squared or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and Student's t -test for continuous variables.

RESULTS

As for the eradication rates of minocycline- and tetracycline-containing BQT, the results of both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses showed that the difference rate of lower limit of 95% confidence interval (CI) was >-10.0% (ITT analysis: 181/217 [83.4%] vs . 180/217 [82.9%], with a rate difference of 0.5% [-6.9% to 7.9%]; PP analysis: 177/193 [91.7%] vs . 176/191 [92.1%], with a rate difference of -0.4% [-5.6% to 6.4%]). Except for dizziness more common (35/215 [16.3%] vs . 13/214 [6.1%], P = 0.001) in minocycline-containing therapy groups, the incidences of adverse events (75/215 [34.9%] vs . 88/214 [41.1%]) and compliance (195/215 [90.7%] vs . 192/214 [89.7%]) were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The eradication efficacy of minocycline-containing BQT was noninferior to tetracycline-containing BQT as first-line regimen for H . pylori eradication with similar safety and compliance.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, ChiCTR 1900023646.

New regimens as first-line eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection in patients allergic to penicillin: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori eradication in penicillin-allergic patients is challenging. The effective regimen is lacking in areas with high antibiotic resistance and tetracycline unavailable. Minocycline, cefuroxime, and full-dose metronidazole are promising drugs.

AIMS

To compare the eradication rate, safety, and compliance among three new bismuth quadruple therapies for first-line H. pylori eradication in penicillin-allergic patients.

METHODS

This randomized trial was conducted on 450 naive patients with H. pylori infection and penicillin allergy. The 14-day minocycline-metronidazole-containing (minocycline 100 mg twice daily and metronidazole 400 mg four times/day), minocycline-cefuroxime-containing (minocycline 100 mg twice daily and cefuroxime 500 mg twice daily), and cefuroxime-metronidazole-containing (cefuroxime 500 mg twice daily and metronidazole 400 mg four times/day) bismuth quadruple therapies were randomly assigned to the participants. Safety and compliance were assessed within 3 days after eradication. Urea breath test was performed 4-8 weeks after eradication to evaluate outcome.

RESULTS

The differences of eradication rates in either intention-to-treat (84.0%, 82.7%, and 23 82.0%, p = .896) or per-protocol (91.7%, 90.9%, and 88.2%, p = .599) analysis among minocycline-metronidazole, minocycline-cefuroxime, and cefuroxime-metronidazole-containing bismuth quadruple therapies were statistically insignificant. The incidence of adverse events (35.1%, 22.6%, and 28.9%) and compliance (90.5%, 91.8%, and 91.9%) were similar. Taste distortion, nausea, and anorexia were more common in metronidazole-containing regimens, and dizziness was more common in minocycline-containing regimens. The allergy was rare (~3%).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacies of three bismuth quadruple therapies containing minocycline, cefuroxime, and full-dose metronidazole (pairwise) for first-line H. pylori eradication in penicillin-allergic patients were similarly satisfactory with relatively good safety and compliance. The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trials Registration (ChiCTR1900023702).

Focusing on Helicobacter pylori infection in the elderly

As a confirmed carcinogen, Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is the main cause of inflammatory diseases of the upper digestive tract and even gastric cancer. There is a high prevalence of H. pylori infection among the elderly population, which may cause adverse clinical outcomes. Particularly noteworthy is that guidelines or expert consensus presently available on H. pylori infection overlook the management of the elderly population as a special group. A brief overview of H. pylori in the elderly is as follows. The detection of H. pylori infection can be divided into invasive and non-invasive techniques, and each technique has its advantages and shortcomings. There may be more side effects associated with eradication treatment in elderly individuals, especially for the frail population. Physical conditions and risk-benefit assessments of the elderly should be considered when selecting therapeutic strategies for H. pylori eradication. Unless there are competing factors, elderly patients should receive H. pylori eradication regimens to finally reduce the formation of gastric cancer. In this review, we summarize the latest understanding of H. pylori in the elderly population to provide effective managements and treatment measures.

Bismuth, esomeprazole, metronidazole and amoxicillin or tetracycline as a first-line regimen for Helicobacter pylori eradication: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Due to general unavailability and common side effects of tetracycline, the clinical application of bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT) is greatly limited. Whether amoxicillin can replace tetracycline in BQT remains unknown. This study aimed to compare the eradication rate, safety and compliance between amoxicillin-containing and tetracycline-containing BQT as a first-line regimen for Helicobacter pylori eradication.

METHODS

This randomized trial was conducted on 404 naïve patients for H. pylori eradication. The participants were randomly assigned to 14-day amoxicillin-containing (bismuth potassium citrate 110 mg four times/day, esomeprazole 20 mg twice daily, metronidazole 400 mg four times/day and amoxicillin 500 mg four times/day) and tetracycline-containing (tetracycline 500 mg four times/day and the other three drugs used as above) BQT. Safety and compliance were assessed within 3 days after eradication. Urea breath test was performed 4-8 weeks after eradication to evaluate outcome.

RESULTS

As for the eradication rates of amoxicillin-containing and tetracycline-containing BQT, the results of both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses showed that the difference rate of the lower limit of 95% confidence interval was above -10.0% (intention-to-treat analysis: 81.7% vs. 83.2%, with a rate difference of -1.5% [-6.3% to 9.3%]; per-protocol analysis: 89.0% vs. 91.6%, -2.6% [-4.1% to 9.3%]). The incidence of adverse events in amoxicillin-containing BQT was significantly lower than tetracycline-containing BQT (29.5% vs. 39.7%). Both groups achieved relatively good compliance (92.0% vs. 89.9%).

CONCLUSION

The eradication efficacy of amoxicillin-containing BQT was non-inferior to tetracycline-containing BQT as a first-line regimen for H. pylori eradication with better safety and similar compliance.

Current role of tailored therapy in treating Helicobacter pylori infections. A systematic review, meta-analysis and critical analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Recent guidelines dictate that all Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infected subjects should receive curative therapy. The efficacy of empirical regimens for H. pylori eradication might decline with bacterial, drug, and host factors. The necessity of a tailored therapy still remains controversial. Here we provide a meta-analysis of the current status of susceptibility-based (tailored) therapy in which susceptibility-based therapies were compared to the currently accepted choice of empiric therapy. In this rapidly closing era, neither the susceptibility nor empiric therapies were routinely optimized, such that we report the outcome of comparisons on the efficacy of unoptimized tailored vs. locally preferred empiric treatments.

METHODS

PubMed, Medline, and Embase databases were searched using suitable keywords. Individual and pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the fixed- or random-effects model as appropriate. Heterogeneity was calculated employing the Cochrane Q test and I² values, whereas the possibility of publication bias was examined by constructing funnel plots. Additionally, subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Thirty-four studies were included with a total of 9613 patients. Tailored therapy proved superior to empiric treatment [OR 2.07 (95% CI 1.53-2.79)]. However, tailored therapy achieved eradication rates >90% in only 15 (44%) studies and >95% in only 6 (17.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although tailored therapy performed better than empiric treatment, the lack of optimization of therapies failed to reliably achieve high cure rates (>90%). These results emphasize that H. pylori infection, like other infectious diseases, should utilize the principles of antimicrobial stewardship in relation to treatment guidance.

Tailored triple plus bismuth therapy based on previous antibiotic medication history for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication: A randomized trial

INTRODUCTION

There are no randomized controlled trials that demonstrate the role of tailored therapy based on past medication history in improving efficacy of H. pylori eradication compared to empiric therapies. The objective of this study was to determine whether tailored triple plus bismuth therapy (TBT) can achieve higher eradication rates based on previous antibiotic history than empiric TBTs.

METHODS

800 treatment-naïve patients were randomly assigned to four groups receiving clarithromycin-, levofloxacin- or metronidazole-containing empiric TBT and tailored TBT (clarithromycin and levofloxacin chosen based on previous macrolides and quinolones medication history). Correlation analyses were performed between past medication history and resistance or eradication rate.

RESULTS

The eradication rates of tailored TBT were significantly higher than clarithromycin-, levofloxacin- and metronidazole-containing empiric TBT in both intention-to-treat (89.5%, 80.8%, 81.5% and 81.5%) and per-protocol (95.1%, 86.7%, 86.5% and 87.8%) analyses (P<0.05). In patients with previous macrolides, quinolones or nitroimidazoles medication history, the resistance rates of corresponding clarithromycin, levofloxacin or metronidazole were significantly higher than patients without past medication history, and the eradication rates of corresponding clarithromycin- or levofloxacin-containing empiric TBT were significantly lower.

CONCLUSION

Tailored TBT based on previous antibiotic history can achieve higher eradication rates than empiric TBT for first-line H. pylori eradication.

High-dose amoxicillin-proton pump inhibitor dual therapy as first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection in Northwest China: A prospective, randomised controlled trial

AIMS

We aimed to assess the eradication efficacy and factors that influencing it of high-dose dual therapy (HDDT) in Gansu region, Northwest China.

METHODS

A total of 216 treatment-naive patients with Helicobacter pylori infection were randomly assigned to two groups for the 14-day eradication treatment: the HDDT group (amoxicillin 750 mg q.i.d. and esomeprazole 40 mg t.i.d.) and the amoxicillin and clarithromycin-containing bismuth quadruple therapy group (ACBQT: esomeprazole 20 mg, bismuth potassium citrate 2 g, amoxicillin 1 g, and clarithromycin 500 mg; b.i.d.). The eradication rates, adverse effects and patient compliance of these two groups were compared. Eradication efficacy was determined by ¹³ C urea breath test (¹³ C UBT) 4-8 weeks after finishing treatment. Antibiotic resistance was determined by the Epsilometer testing (E-test) method.

RESULTS

The eradication rates for the HDDT and ACBQT groups were 71.0% and 74.7% (P = .552) by per-protocol analysis, and 65.7% and 68.5% (P = .664) by intention-to-treat analysis. The overall adverse event rates in the HDDT and ACBQT groups were 2.0% and 43.4% (P < .001), respectively. The resistance rates to amoxicillin, clarithromycin, tetracycline, levofloxacin and metronidazole were 15.2%, 42.0%, 5.4%, 35.7% and 83.0%, respectively. Amoxicillin resistance and delta over baseline (DOB) of ¹³ C UBT ≥ 20 before treatment significantly reduced the eradication rate in 112 participants with H. pylori cultured.

CONCLUSION

The HDDT as first-line treatment for H. pylori was unsatisfactory in Gansu. Amoxicillin resistance and DOB of ¹³ C UBT ≥ 20 before treatment were significantly correlated with H. pylori eradication failure.

Personalized Approach in Eradication of Helicobacter pylori Infection

The increase in antibiotic resistance to Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is associated with a decrease in the effectiveness of eradication therapy. Although some success has been achieved by adjusting therapeutic regimens according to local data on resistance to certain antibiotics, a new approach is needed to ensure a better therapeutic response. Tailored therapy, based on sensitivity tests to antibiotics, is increasingly proving to be a superior therapeutic option, even as a first-line therapy. Moreover, the recently published Maastricht VI guidelines emphasize utilizing a susceptibility-guided strategy in respect to antibiotic stewardship as the first choice for eradication therapy. In addition, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technology is becoming a standard tool in the diagnosis of H. pylori infections through non-invasive testing, which further optimizes the eradication process. We provide a review regarding the current position of the individualized approach in eradication therapy and its future prospects. Based on novel understandings, the personalized approach is an effective strategy to increase the successful eradication of H. pylori infections.

2022 Chinese national clinical practice guideline on Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori ( H. pylori ) infection is an infectious disease with a prevalence rate of up to 50% worldwide. It can cause indigestion, gastritis, peptic ulcer, and gastric cancer. H. pylori eradication treatment can effectively control disease progression and reduce the risk of the above conditions. However, the escalating trend of antibiotic resistance presents a global challenge for H. pylori eradication. We aim to provide guidance on pharmacological treatment of H. pylori infection.

METHODS

This clinical practice guideline is developed following the World Health Organization's recommended process, adopting Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation in assessing evidence quality, and utilizing Evidence to Decision framework to formulate clinical recommendations, minimizing bias and increasing transparency of the clinical practice guideline development process. We used the Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in HealThcare (RIGHT) statement and The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) as reporting and conduct guides to ensure the guideline's completeness and transparency.

RESULTS

Though decreasing in developed countries, the prevalence of H. pylori remains high in developing countries, causing a major public health burden. This clinical practice guideline contains 12 recommendations concerning pharmacological treatment for H. pylori eradication. Among them, it is worth highlighting that bismuth preparations are inexpensive, safe, and effective, consequently making bismuth quadruple therapy a preferred choice for initial and rescue treatment. In empirical treatment, high-dose dual therapy is equally effective compared with bismuth quadruple therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The 12 recommendations in this clinical practice guideline are formed with consideration for stakeholders' values and preferences, resource use, feasibility, and acceptability. Recommendations are generalizable to resource limited settings with similar antibiotic resistance pattern as China, and lower middle-income countries facing comparable sociological and technical challenges.

REGISTRATION

Guidelines International Network (GIN) website, https://guidelines.ebmportal.com/node/69996 .

Reassessment of the Broth Microdilution Method for Susceptibility Testing of Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori infection is an infectious disease and thus the eradication treatment should be guided by susceptibility testing. This study aimed to assess the applicability of broth microdilution as a routine susceptibility testing method for H. pylori.

METHODS

Susceptibility profiles of clarithromycin (CLR) and levofloxacin (LEV) resistance in 76 clinical H. pylori isolates were simultaneously assessed using agar dilution and broth microdilution methods. The correlation between the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) obtained by the 2 methods was assessed by means of linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

The correlation between the MICs determined by broth microdilution method and agar dilution method was good for both CLR (r = 0.966) and LEV (r = 0.959). The susceptibility agreement between the 2 methods was 100% for CLR and 96.1% for LEV. Using the broth microdilution method, the false resistance was found in 3.9% (3 of 76) strains for LEV susceptibility testing. No false susceptibility was found for either CLR or LEV, and no false resistance was found for susceptibility testing of CLR.

CONCLUSIONS

The broth microdilution method is suitable for routine susceptibility testing of clinical H. pylori isolates.

Multiple Bismuth Quadruple Therapy Containing Tetracyclines Combined with Other Antibiotics and Helicobacter pylori Eradication Therapy

Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection is closely associated with the development of chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer, and gastric cancer. However, the resistance rate of H. pylori strains to antibiotics such as clarithromycin, metronidazole, and levofloxacin has increased significantly, resulting in a significant decrease in the eradication efficacy of commonly used regimens. Tetracycline has received the attention of domestic and foreign scholars because of its low resistance. The purpose of this review is to provide an update on the tetracycline-containing bismuth quadruple eradication therapy for H. pylori infection and review the efficacy and safety of the regimens, hoping to provide guidance for clinical practice.

Tailored therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Due to an increase in drug resistance, the eradication rate of H. pylori with empirical therapy has declined. Tailored therapy has been proposed as an alternative to standard empirical treatments. The necessity of personalized eradication therapy remains unclear. The aim of this study was to determine whether tailored therapy is superior to empirical therapy for H. pylori infection. Methods: We searched for eligible randomized controlled trials in the PubMed, Embase (Ovid), Wanfang, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases up to 10 December 2021. A random effects model comparing pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was applied in the meta-analysis. Results: Twenty-one studies were included in the meta-analysis. In the first-line treatment, tailored therapy was more effective than empirical therapy (RR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.08-1.21], I2 = 72.2%). In the second-line therapy setting, the results did not reveal significant differences between the two treatments (RR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.84-1.30], I2 = 80.6%). A similar result was observed in mixed second- and third-line treatments (RR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.96-1.11], I2 = 0.0%). Regarding adverse events, no significant differences were found between the two treatments (RR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.80-1.01], I2 = 35.7%). Most of the results were highly heterogeneous. Conclusion: A tailored approach might provide a better eradication rate than empirical methods in first-line treatment. There might be no obvious advantage in second-line or mixed second- and third-line treatments third-line treatment. Due to the high heterogeneity, the results should be interpreted with caution. Further clinical studies are needed and justified.

Clinical audit of current Helicobacter pylori treatment outcomes in Singapore

INTRODUCTION

H. pylori eradication reduces the risk of gastric malignancies and peptic ulcer disease. First-line therapies include 14-day PAC (proton pump inhibitor [PPI], amoxicillin, clarithromycin) and PBMT (PPI, bismuth, metronidazole, tetracycline). Second-line therapies include 14-day PBMT and PAL (PPI, amoxicillin, levofloxacin). This clinical audit examined current treatment outcomes in Singapore.

METHODS

Clinical data of H. pylori-positive patientswho underwent empirical first- and second-line eradication therapies from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2018 were reviewed. Treatment success was determined by 13C urea breath test performed at least 4 weeks after treatment and 2 weeks off PPI.

RESULTS

A total of 963 patients (862 PAC, 36 PMC [PPI, metronidazole, clarithromycin], 18 PBMT, 13 PBAC [PAC with bismuth], 34 others) and 98 patients (62 PMBT, 15 PAL, 21 others) received first-and second-line therapies respectively. A 14-day treatment duration was appropriately prescribed for first- and second-line therapies in 65.2% and 82.7% of patients, respectively. First-line treatment success rates were noted for PAC (seven-day: 76.9%, ten-day: 88.3%, 14-day: 92.0%), PMC (seven-day: 0, ten-day: 75.0%, 14-day: 69.8%), PBMT (ten-day: 100%, 14-day: 87.5%) and PBAC (14-day: 100%). 14-day treatment was superior to seven-day treatment (90.8% vs. 71.4%; P = 0.028). PAC was superior to PMC (P < 0.001) but similar to PBMT (P = 0.518) and PBAC (P = 0.288) in 14-day therapies. 14-day second-line PAL and PBMT had similar efficacy (90.9% vs. 82.4%; P = 0.674).

CONCLUSION

First-line empirical treatment using PAC, PBMT and PBAC for 14 days had similar efficacy. Success rates for second-line PBMT and PAL were similar.

Primary Antibiotic Resistance of Helicobacter pylori in Different Regions of China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aim: Understanding the prevalence of antibiotic resistance can provide reliable information for selecting treatment options. The goal of this meta-analysis was to observe the primary antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) in different regions and time periods of China. Method: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Chinese Biomedical databases and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure from inception to 20 February 2022. Data on the prevalence of H. pylori primary resistance at various time points were included. A random-effect model was established to calculate the pooled antibiotic resistance. Results: In total, 2150 articles were searched, with 70 meeting the inclusion criteria. The resistance to clarithromycin, metronidazole, levofloxacin amoxicillin, tetracycline and furazolidone in 2016–2020 were 34% (95% CI: 30–39%), 78% (95% CI: 73–84%), 35% (95% CI: 30–40%), 3% (95% CI: 1–5%), 2% (95%CI: 1–4%) and 1% (95% CI: 0–4%), respectively. Clarithromycin showed regional difference, as the resistance was higher in northern (37%, 95% CI: 32–41%) and western China (35%, 95% CI: 17–54%) than that in southern (24%, 95% CI: 17–32%) and eastern China (24%, 95% CI: 20–28%). Conclusion: The resistance of H. pylori to clarithromycin and metronidazole was high and increased over time, whereas resistance to levofloxacin, amoxicillin, tetracycline and furazolidone remained stable.

Empirical vs. Susceptibility-Guided Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Treating Helicobacter pylori infection according to antibiotic resistance has been frequently recommended. However, information on its real effectiveness is scarce.

Aim

The aim of this study is to perform a meta-analysis comparing empirical vs. susceptibility-guided treatment of H. pylori.

Methods

Selection of studies: Studies comparing empirical versus susceptibility-guided treatment were selected. Search strategy: electronic and manual up to August 2021. Data synthesis: by intention-to-treat (random-effects model).

Results

Overall, 54 studies were included (6,705 patients in the susceptibility-guided group and 7,895 in the empirical group). H. pylori eradication rate was 86 vs. 76%, respectively (RR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.08-1.17; I 2: 83%). Similar results were found when only RCTs were evaluated (24 studies; RR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.11-1.22; I 2: 71%) and when susceptibility testing was assessed by culture (RR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.06-1.18) or PCR (RR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.05-1.23). For first-line treatments (naïve patients; 30 studies), better efficacy results were obtained with the susceptibility-guided strategy (RR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.11-1.20; I 2: 79%). However, for empirical first-line quadruple regimens, in particular (both with and without bismuth, excluding the suboptimal triple therapies), not based on CYP2C19 gene polymorphism, no differences in efficacy were found compared with the susceptibility-guided group (RR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.99-1.09); this lack of difference was confirmed in RCTs (RR: 1.05; 95% CI: 0.99-1.12). For rescue therapies (13 studies, most 2nd-line), similar results were demonstrated for both strategies, including all studies (RR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.97-1.22; I 2: 82%) and when only RCTs were considered (RR: 1.15; 95% CI: 0.97-1.36).

Conclusion

The benefit of susceptibility-guided treatment over empirical treatment of H. pylori infection could not be demonstrated, either in first-line (if the most updated quadruple regimens are prescribed) or in rescue therapies.

V Spanish Consensus Conference on Helicobacter pylori infection treatment

Helicobacter pylori infection is very common in the Spanish population and represents the main cause of chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer, and gastric cancer. The last iteration of Spanish consensus guidelines on H. pylori infection was conducted in 2016. Recent changes in therapeutic schemes along with increasing supporting evidence were key for developing the V Spanish Consensus Conference (May 2021). Fourteen experts performed a systematic review of the scientific evidence and developed a series of recommendations that were subjected to an anonymous Delphi process of iterative voting. Scientific evidence and the strength of the recommendation were classified using GRADE guidelines. An eradication therapy, when prescribed empirically, is considered acceptable when it reliably achieves, or preferably surpass, 90% cure rates. Currently, only quadruple therapies (with or without bismuth) and generally lasting 14 days, accomplish this goal in first- and second-line therapies. A non-bismuth quadruple concomitant regimen (proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin, amoxicillin, and metronidazole) or a quadruple bismuth-based combination (proton pump inhibitor, bismuth, tetracycline, and metronidazole), are recommended as first-line regimens. Rescue therapies after eradication failure and management of H. pylori infection in peptic ulcer disease were also reviewed.

E-Test or Agar Dilution for Metronidazole Susceptibility Testing of Helicobacter pylori: Importance of the Prevalence of Metronidazole Resistance

Background

A number of studies have shown that E-test overestimated the presence of Helicobacter pylori resistance compared to agar dilution.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to explore whether E-test could be an alternative for agar dilution to detect the metronidazole susceptibility of H. pylori.

Method

E-test and agar dilution were used to assess the susceptibility of H. pylori to metronidazole, clarithromycin, and levofloxacin in 281 clinical isolates obtained from China where the resistance was high. Cohen’s kappa analysis, McNemar’s test, and essential and categorical agreement analysis were performed for these two methods.

Results

Overall, the result of the E-test showed a similar prevalence of resistance rate to all antibiotics compared with agar dilution. The essential agreement of the E-test method and agar dilution in the evaluation susceptibility of H. pylori to clarithromycin and levofloxacin was moderate at 89.0 and 79.7%, respectively, but only 45.9% for metronidazole. The results shown by a categorical agreement (CA) between the E-test and agar dilution were 100% for both clarithromycin and levofloxacin. As for metronidazole, the CA was 98.7%, no major error was identified, and the rate of a very major error was 1.8%.

Conclusion

E-test can be an alternative method to detect the metronidazole susceptibility of H. pylori.

Need for standardization and harmonization of Helicobacter pylori antimicrobial susceptibility testing

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

As with other infectious diseases, Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens should be guided by susceptibility testing to achieve excellent success rate, especially in the era of high antibiotic resistance. However, susceptibility testing for H. pylori is rarely performed, which can be partly ascribed to the current lack of standardization of testing methods and the lack of unified consensus on the antibiotic resistance breakpoints. The aim of this review was to call for an international consensus on standardization and harmonization of H. pylori susceptibility testing.

METHODS

We summarize and compare the advantages and disadvantages of four different phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) methods (agar dilution, E-test, disk diffusion, and broth microdilution) and the molecular susceptibility testing method for H. pylori.

RESULTS

The standard phenotypic testing methods and the molecular testing methods have their own advantages and disadvantages. Compared to the standard phenotypic methods, the molecular testing method does not require successful H. pylori culture, and therefore, is much more rapid and convenient for clinical use. However, the currently available molecular testing method is only suitable for detecting clarithromycin and quinolone susceptibility profiles in H. pylori. Although the standard AST is time-consuming, it is currently the only way to test the susceptibility of H. pylori to all the commonly used antibiotics.

CONCLUSION

To make H. pylori susceptibility testing become a clinical routine, an international consensus on standardization and harmonization of H. pylori AST is needed. Future efforts are needed for optimizing broth culture of H. pylori, and developing commercial AST plates for achieving high throughput and automated susceptibility testing for H. pylori.

Susceptibility-Guided Therapy vs. Bismuth-Containing Quadruple Therapy as the First-Line Treatment for Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

The increased antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) has led to the decreased efficacy of H. pylori regimens.

Aim

To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and compliance of susceptibility-guided therapy (SGT) vs. bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BQT) as the first-line treatment for H. pylori infection.

Materials and Methods

This meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA 2009 guidelines. A systematic search in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was conducted using the combination of “H. pylori or H. pylori or Hp,” “bismuth quadruple,” and “tailored eradication OR tailored therapy OR susceptibility-guided therapy OR personalized therapy OR antibiotic susceptibility testing.”

Results

Five studies with 2,110 H. pylori-infected patients were enrolled. The pooled eradication rates of SGT and BQT were 86 vs. 78% (p < 0.05) and 92 vs. 86% (p > 0.05) by intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses, respectively. SGT has a significantly superior efficacy than BQT [pooled risk ratio (RR) = 1.14, p < 0.05] in a subgroup of cultures with the susceptibility test. The pooled side effect rate was 20% in SGT and 22% in BQT, which showed no significant difference (p > 0.05). The compliances of SGT and BQT were 95 and 92%, respectively.

Conclusion

Compared with BQT, SGT showed a higher efficacy and similar safety as the first-line treatment of H. pylori infection in areas with high antibiotic resistance. The decision-making of first-line regimens for H. pylori infection should depend on the availability and cost-effectiveness of susceptibility tests and bismuth in local areas.

Bismuth-Based Quadruple Therapy versus Metronidazole-Intensified Triple Therapy as a First-Line Treatment for Clarithromycin-Resistant Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Background/Aims

Clarithromycin resistance is a main factor for treatment failure in the context of Helicobacterpylori infection. However, the treatment regimen for clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori infection has not yet been determined. We aimed to compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of 14-day bismuth-based quadruple therapy versus 14-day metronidazole-intensified triple therapy for clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori infection with genotypic resistance.

Methods

This was a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. A total of 782 patients with H. pylori infection examined using sequencing-based clarithromycin resistance point mutation tests were recruited between December 2018 and October 2020 in four institutions in Korea. Patients with significant point mutations (A2142G, A2142C, A2143G, A2143C, and A2144G) were randomly assigned to receive either 14-day bismuth-based quadruple therapy (n=102) or 14-day metronidazole-intensified triple therapy (n=99).

Results

The overall genotypic clarithromycin resistance rate was 25.7% according to the sequencing method. The eradication rate of 14-day bismuth-based quadruple therapy was not significantly different in the intention-to-treat analysis (80.4% vs 69.7%, p=0.079), but was significantly higher than that of 14-day metronidazole-intensified triple therapy in the per-protocol analysis (95.1% vs 76.4%, p=0.001). There were no significant differences in the incidence of side effects. In addition, the 14-day bismuth-based quadruple therapy was more cost-effective than the 14-day metronidazole-intensified triple therapy.

Conclusions

Fourteen-day bismuth-based quadruple therapy showed comparable efficacy with 14-day metronidazole-intensified triple therapy, and it was more cost-effective in the context of clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori infection.

Susceptibility-guided versus empirical treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Empirical therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection is limited by increasing antibiotic resistance and suboptimal eradication rates. Studies of the relative effectiveness of susceptibility-guided therapy have produced conflicting results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine whether susceptibility-guided therapy is superior to empirical therapy for H. pylori infection.

METHODS

We searched articles listed in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science through May 25, 2020, RCTs comparing susceptibility-guided versus empirical therapy for H. pylori infection. Outcomes, including effectiveness and safety, were analyzed in a meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Our final analysis included 16 studies, comprising 2374 patients who received susceptibility-guided therapy and 2451 patients who received empirical treatment. In previously untreated subjects, susceptibility-guided therapy was slightly more effective than empirical therapy (intent to treat risk ratio [RR], 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.21; P < 0.0001, I²  = 75%). Susceptibility-guided therapy was superior to first-line clarithromycin-based triple therapy only when clarithromycin resistance exceeded 20% (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07-1.30; P = 0.001, I²  = 81%). Susceptibility-guided therapy was not more effective than empirical quadruple therapy (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.92-1.13; P = 0.759, I²  = 80%). Three RCTs were performed exclusively among previously treated subjects, and were highly heterogeneous.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that susceptibility-guided treatment may be slightly superior to empirical first line triple therapy. Susceptibility- guided treatment does not appear to be superior to empirical first-line quadruple therapy or empirical rescue therapy.

Tailored eradication strategy vs concomitant therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment in Korean patients

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic resistance to Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, which ultimately results in eradication failure, has been an emerging issue in the clinical field. Recently, to overcome this problem, an antibiotic sensitivity-based tailored therapy (TT) for H. pylori infection has received attention.

AIM

To investigate the efficacy and safety profiles of TT for H. pylori infection treatment compared to a non-bismuth quadruple therapy, concomitant therapy (CT) regimen.

METHODS

We included patients (> 18 years) with an H. pylori infection and without a history of Helicobacter eradication who visited the Gil Medical Center between March 2016 and October 2020. After being randomly assigned to either the TT or CT treatment group in 1 to 1 manner, patient compliance, eradication success rate (ESR), and patient-reported side effects profiles were assessed and compared between the two groups. H. pylori infection was diagnosed using a rapid urease test, Giemsa stain, or dual priming oligonucleotide polymerase chain reaction (DPO-PCR). Tailored eradication strategy based through the presence of a 23S ribosomal RNA point mutation. For the TT group, a DPO-PCR test, which detected A2142G and/or A2143G point mutations, and a clarithromycin resistance test were performed. Patients in the clarithromycin-resistant group were treated with a bismuth-containing quadruple combination therapy, while those with sensitive results were treated with the standard triple regimen.

RESULTS

Of the 217 patients with a treatment naive H. pylori infection, 110 patients [mean age: 58.66 ± 13.03, men, n = 55 (50%)] were treated with TT, and 107 patients [mean age: 56.67 ± 10.88, men, n = 52 (48.60%)] were treated with CT. The compliance (TT vs CT, 100% vs 98.13%, P = 0.30), and follow-up loss rates (8.18% vs 9.35%, P = 0.95) were not significantly different between the groups. The ESR after treatment was also not statistically different between the groups (TT vs CT, 82.73% vs 82.24%, P = 0.95). However, the treatment-related and patient-reported side effects were significantly lower in the TT group than in the CT group (22.77% vs 50.52%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The DPO-based TT regimen shows promising results in efficacy and safety profiles as a first-line Helicobacter eradication regimen in Korea, especially when physicians are confronted with increased antibiotic resistance rates.

The effect of CYP2C19 gene polymorphism on the eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori by proton pump inhibitors-containing regimens in Asian populations: a meta-analysis

Premise: The effects of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) depend on metabolic enzyme CYP2C19 that has different activity due to gene polymorphism. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to determine the potential effects of CYP2C19 polymorphism on the efficiency of PPI-based treatment. Materials & methods: The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, etc. were searched for relevant articles published in English or Chinese from inception to 31 May 2020. Finally, 26 randomized controlled trials and 15 cohort studies met the inclusion criteria and used for the meta-analysis via STATA version 15. Results: Poor metabolizer (PM) genotype Helicobacter pylori eradication rates were highest for Asian individuals receiving triple or quadruple first-line therapy based on PPIs (p < 0.05). CYP2C19 polymorphism could influence H. pylori eradication rate only in Mainland China and Japan (p < 0.05). Conclusion: PM genotype facilitates the elimination of H. pylori in Asian populations. Rabeprazole-, esomeprazole- and pantoprazole-based eradication program was less affected by the CYP2C19 polymorphism.

The effect of previous eradication failure on antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori: A retrospective study over 8 years in Beijing

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic resistance is the main cause of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) treatment failure. This study aimed to explore the characteristics of antibiotic resistance of H. pylori isolates in Beijing in the last 8 years and to estimate the impact of previous eradication failure on resistance patterns.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included data from a single center in Beijing from 2013 to 2020. Antibiotic susceptibility of 365 clinical H. pylori isolates was tested for amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and tetracycline. The characteristics of the included patients and their previous eradication history were collected. Primary and secondary resistance rates of H. pylori to the six antibiotics and the impact of previous eradication failure on antibiotic resistance patterns were analyzed.

RESULTS

The overall primary resistance rates of amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and tetracycline were 0.7%, 55.2%, 68.0%, 49.7%, 64.5%, and 0%, with no significant increase during the observed period; while the secondary resistance rates were 3.2%, 96.7%, 90.7%, 93.1%, 80.0%, and 0%, respectively. The secondary resistance rate of clarithromycin (p < .001), metronidazole (p = .001), and levofloxacin (p < .001) significantly increased to 100% as the number of previous eradication therapies increased and exhibited a linear association. For strains naive to eradication, only 6.8% were susceptible to all the antibiotics, while 32.4% were single resistant, and 60.8% dual or multiple resistant. Clarithromycin+metronidazole+fluoroquinolone multiple resistance was the predominant pattern (0 course: 21.6%, 1 course: 37.5%, 2 courses: 56.1%, ≥3 courses: 71.1%; p < .001) for patients with treatment failure. The prevalence of dual or multiple-resistance patterns increased significantly as the number of previous therapies increased.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of primary and secondary resistance rates of clarithromycin, metronidazole, moxifloxacin, and levofloxacin were high in Beijing. Multiple-resistance patterns were common after treatment failure. Resistance rates of amoxicillin and tetracycline remained low and stable.

Evidence based guidelines for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in Korea 2020

Helicobacter pylori infection is one of the most common infectious diseases worldwide. H. pylori is responsible for substantial gastrointestinal morbidity with a high disease burden. Since the revision of the H. pylori Clinical Practice Guidelines in 2013 in Korea, the eradication rate of H. pylori has gradually decreased with the use of a clarithromycin based triple therapy. According to a nationwide randomized controlled study by the Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research released in 2018, the intention-to-treat eradication rate was only 63.9%, which was mostly due to increased antimicrobial resistance to clarithromycin. The clinical practice guidelines for treatment of H. pylori were updated based on evidence-based medicine from a meta-analysis conducted on a target group receiving the latest level of eradication therapy. The draft recommendations developed based on the meta-analysis were finalized after expert consensus on three recommendations regarding the indication for treatment and eight recommendations on the treatment itself. These guidelines were designed to provide clinical evidence for the treatment of H. pylori to patients, nurses, medical school students, policymakers, and clinicians. These may differ from current medical insurance standards, and will be revised if more evidence emerges in the future.

Cost-Effectiveness, Efficacy, and Safety Analysis of Tailored Therapy in Patients with Helicobacter pylori Infection

Recently in Korea, where triple therapy is accepted as the first-line Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication treatment, antibiotic resistance to clarithromycin has increased considerably, resulting in eradication rates of less than 80%. We investigated the efficacy of tailored therapy after a clarithromycin resistance test compared with empirical therapy for H. pylori eradication. The cost-effectiveness of H. pylori eradication success was evaluated according to the average medical cost per patient. A total of 364 patients were enrolled in the study. The first-line H. pylori eradication rate was significantly higher in patients who received tailored therapy than in those who received empirical therapy. The total medical costs for the tailored and empirical groups were 46,374 Won and 53,528 Won. The total treatment period for each ultimately successful eradication in the tailored group was 79.8 ± 2.8 days, which is shorter than that of the empirical group (99.2 ± 7.4 days). The rate of eradication-related adverse events for the tailored group and empirical group was 12.9% and 14.8%, respectively. Tailored therapy could be a useful option to achieve a higher successful eradication rate, shorter treatment periods, and lower medical costs than empirical therapy in the era of increasing antibiotic resistance.

Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Concomitant and Tailored Therapy for Eradication of Helicobacter pylori Infection

As high clarithromycin resistance (>20%) in the Split-Dalmatia region of Croatia hinders the treatment of H. pylori infection, the primary objective of this study was to compare concomitant quadruple with the tailored, personalized therapy as first-line eradication treatment of H. pylori. In an open-label, randomized clinical trial, 80 patients with H. pylori infection were randomly assigned to either concomitant (esomeprazole 40 mg, amoxicillin 1 gr, metronidazole 500 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, twice daily for 14 days) or tailored therapy in accordance with the results of the antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Eradication status was assessed 4 weeks after treatment. Eradication rates were significantly higher in tailored group than in concomitant group both in intention-to-treat (70 vs. 92.5%, p = 0.010) and per-protocol (87.5 vs. 100%, p = 0.030) analysis in the setting of increasing antibiotic resistance (clarithromycin 37.5%, metronidazole 17.5%, dual resistance 10%). Adverse effects were more frequent in the concomitant group (32.5 vs. 7.5%, p = 0.006). Tailored therapy achieves higher eradication with a lower adverse events rate. With the increasing resistance of H. pylori strains to antibiotic treatment, eradication regimes with such characteristics should be strongly considered as a reasonable choice for first-line treatment.

Comparative efficacy and safety of high-dose dual therapy, bismuth-based quadruple therapy and non-bismuth quadruple therapies for Helicobacter pylori infection: a network meta-analysis

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is associated with the development of multiple diseases. The eradication rate of H. pylori has gradually decreased, suggesting the need to discover more effective therapies. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of first-line treatments including high-dose dual therapy (HDDT), bismuth-based quadruple therapy (BQT), sequential therapy (ST), concomitant therapy (CT) and hybrid therapy (HT) by network meta-analysis (NMA). A comprehensive search on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science, was performed from their inception to 1 September 2019. A network analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing first-line therapies were carried out using Stata 14.0 and Revman 5.2. Moreover, a sensitivity analysis was conducted by omitting non-Asian studies. Finally, 41 RCTs with 14 119 patients were included. The NMA showed that, in terms of eradication rate, ST for 10 days (ST-10) was significantly lower than CT for 10 or 14 days (CT ≥ 10). Sensitivity analysis among the Asian population showed that ST-10 denoted the lowest effectiveness among the interventions. The ranking results based on probability showed that HDDT ranked first for the eradication rate. As for adverse events, HDDT was significantly less than BQT and CT regardless of duration, while BQT for 14 days represented higher adverse events than ST, HT and CT ≥ 10. HDDT ranked first among the therapies. In conclusion, HDDT for 14 days appeared to be the most optimal first-line therapy for H. pylori among the Asian population with comparable efficacy and compliance but causing fewer adverse events.

Application of Visual Gene Clip-Based Tailored Therapy for the Eradication of Helicobacter pylori

Background

Helicobacter pylori eradication with therapies employing a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and antimicrobial agents is mainly achieved via bacterial susceptibility to antimicrobial agents and the magnitude of acid secretion inhibition. However, annual eradication rates have greatly declined in Mainland China, and therefore, tailored H. pylori eradication regimens that inhibit acid secretion and employ optimal antimicrobial agents determined based on gene clip testing may improve eradication rates. This study was aimed at evaluating the efficacy of tailored H. pylori eradication therapy guided by visual gene clip testing for antibiotic resistance and PPI metabolism genotypes.

Methods

This prospective study included 244 patients (141 men and 103 women aged 20-79 years) receiving initial treatment for H. pylori infection. Visual gene clip testing using gastric mucosal specimens was performed to detect antibiotic resistance to clarithromycin conferred by the A2142G and A2143G point mutations of the H. pylori 23S rRNA gene and to levofloxacin conferred by the Asn87 and Asp91 point mutations of the H. pylori gyrA gene. Patients received a 14-day bismuth quadruple therapy regimen guided by testing for antibiotic resistance and CYP2C19 polymorphisms, and primary H. pylori eradication was assessed at least 4 weeks after therapy.

Results

H. pylori strains were successfully isolated from the gastric mucosa tissues of 244 patients. Antibiotic resistant isolates were identified in 63 patients, with clarithromycin resistance observed in 50 patients, levofloxacin resistance in 7 patients, and dual resistance in 6 patients. The PPI metabolic genotype of CYP2C19 was detected in 242 of 244 cases, and 97 cases were categorized as extensive metabolizers, 141 as intermediate metabolizers, and 4 as poor metabolizers. Among the 242 patients who received tailored therapy, the H. pylori eradication rate was 90.9% (95% confidence interval 87.3%~94.6%) in the intention-to-treat analysis and 96.9% (95% confidence interval 94.7%~99.2%) in the per protocol analysis.

Conclusions

Tailored therapy for H. pylori infection guided by determination of antibiotic resistance and CYP2C19 polymorphism using visual gene chip technology may provide high clinical effectiveness as initial H. pylori eradication therapy.

Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Korea 2020

Helicobacter pylori infection is one of the most common infectious diseases worldwide. Although the prevalence of H. pylori is gradually decreasing, approximately half of the world&#039;s population still becomes infected with this disease. H. pylori is responsible for substantial gastrointestinal morbidity worldwide, with a high disease burden. It is the most common cause of gastric and duodenal ulcers and gastric cancer. Since the revision of the H. pylori clinical practice guidelines in 2013 in Korea, the eradication rate of H. pylori has gradually decreased with the use of a clarithromycin-based triple therapy for 7 days. According to a nationwide randomized controlled study conducted by the Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research released in 2018, the intention-to-treat eradication rate was only 63.9%, which was mostly due to increased antimicrobial resistance, especially from clarithromycin. The clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of H. pylori were updated according to evidence-based medicine from a meta-analysis conducted on a target group receiving the latest level of eradication therapy. The draft recommendations developed based on the meta-analysis were finalized after an expert consensus on three recommendations regarding the indication for treatment and eight recommendations for the treatment itself. These guidelines were designed to provide clinical evidence for the treatment (including primary care treatment) of H. pylori infection to patients, nurses, medical school students, policymakers, and clinicians. These may differ from current medical insurance standards and will be revised if more evidence emerges in the future.

Siliankang combined with esomeprazole sodium for treatment of Helicobacter pylori-associated gastritis: Efficacy and influence on NF-κB signaling pathway

BACKGROUND

Based on pharmacology and pharmacogenetics, the optimized dual therapy of proton pump inhibitors-amoxicillin has began to be used in clinical practice. A recent consensus report pointed out that probiotics also have a significant effect on Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication. However, there are few clinical reports on the therapeutic effect and possible mechanism of the two treatments for H. pylori-related gastritis.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of Siliankang (bifidobacterium quadruple viable bacteria tablets) combined with esomeprazole sodium in the treatment of H. pylori-associated gastritis and its effect on the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathway.

METHODS

The clinical data of 64 patients with H. pylori-related gastritis who were treated at our hospital from November 2018 to December 2019 were analyzed. The included subjects were randomly divided into either a treatment group (32 cases) or a control group (32 cases) using the random number table method. Both groups received optimized dual therapy after admission, that is, esomeprazole sodium enteric-coated tablets 20 mg + amoxicillin capsules 1000 mg, both bid. On this basis, the treatment group was additionally treated with Siliankang. Both groups were treated continuously for 14 d. The clinical efficacy, gastric mucosal changes, HP eradication rate, and drug-related adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. The NF-κB p50 and p65 proteins were quantified after pathological biopsy under gastroscopy before and after treatment. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to detect NF-κB p50 and p65 mRNA, and immunohistochemistry was used to detect the levels of interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α.

RESULTS

After treatment, NF-κB p50 and p65 mRNA and protein showed a downward trend in both groups, and the decrease was significantly greater in the treatment group than in the control group (1.42 ± 0.33 vs 1.10 ± 0.24, 1.27 ± 0.26 vs 0.87 ± 0.17, 2.51 ± 0.52 vs 1.94 ± 0.28, and 2.33 ± 0.37 vs 1.77 ± 0.23, respectively; P < 0.01). IL-1β, IL-8, and TNF-α also showed a downward trend in both groups, and the decrease was significantly greater in the treatment group than in the control group (11.50 ± 3.40 vs 7.30 ± 2.16, 237.70 ± 27.72 vs 193.68 ± 19.88, and 19.30 ± 3.41 vs 10.87 ± 2.18, respectively; P < 0.01). The number of cases with gastric mucosal congestion, edema, erosion, and bleeding point improvement in the treatment group was significantly more than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The total effective rate of the treatment group was significantly higher than that of the control group (96.88% vs 78.13%, P < 0.05), and the H. pylori eradication rate was also significantly higher than that of the control group (93.75% vs 75.00%, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Siliankang combined with optimized dual therapy can significantly alleviate the symptoms of H. pylori-related gastritis. The mechanism may be related to the inhibition of the activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway and the release of inflammatory factors.

Evidence-based Guidelines for the Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Korea: 2020 Revised Edition

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is one of the most common infectious diseases worldwide. Although its incidence is gradually decreasing, about half of the world's population still get infected. H. pylori infection is responsible for substantial gastrointestinal morbidity worldwide. It is the most common cause of gastric and duodenal ulcers as well as gastric cancer. Since the revision of the H. pylori Clinical Practice Guidelines in 2013, the eradication rate of H. pylori has gradually decreased with the use of classical triple therapy, wherein amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and proton pump inhibitors are administered, for 7 days. According to a nationwide randomized controlled study conducted by the Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research released in 2018, the intention-to-treat eradication rate was only 63.9%, which was due to increased antimicrobial resistance induced by the use of antibiotics, especially clarithromycin. The update of clinical practice guideline for treatment of H. pylori was developed based on evidence-based medicine by conducting a meta-analysis. The draft recommendations were finalized after expert consensus on three recommendations regarding the indication for treatment and eight recommendations on the treatment itself. These guidelines are designed to provide patients, nurses, medical school students, policymakers, and clinicians with clinical evidence to guide primary care and treatment of H. pylori infection. These may differ from current medical insurance standards and will be revised further, if necessary, based on research-based evidence.

A comparative study of 14-day dual therapy (esomeprazole and amoxicillin four times daily) and triple plus bismuth therapy for first-line Helicobacter pylori infection eradication: A randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Favorable outcomes in treating H pylori infection using "dual therapy (proton pump inhibitor and amoxicillin four times daily)" have attracted widespread attention. However, there are few reports, and the study results lack agreement. This study aimed to compare the eradication rate, safety, and compliance of naïve-treatment patients with H pylori infection on "dual therapy" with those on "triple plus bismuth (TPB) therapy."

METHODS

This is a non-inferior randomized controlled trial conducted on 760 patients with H pylori infection. The participants were randomly assigned to two eradication groups: dual therapy (esomeprazole 20 mg and amoxicillin 750 mg four times daily) and TPB therapy (esomeprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and bismuth potassium citrate 220 mg twice daily) for 14 days. Safety and compliance were assessed within 3 days after eradication. Urea breath test was performed about 8 weeks after eradication to evaluate outcome. Antibiotic resistance and CYP2C19 polymorphism were determined.

RESULTS

Compared with TPB therapy, dual therapy had significantly higher eradication rates in intention-to-treat (87.1% vs 80.5%, rate difference 6.6%), modified intention-to-treat (90.9% vs 85.5%, 5.5%) and per-protocol (92.4% vs 87.8%, 4.7%) analyses, respectively. Adverse reactions in dual therapy group were significantly lower than TPB therapy group (17.6% vs 25.5%, P = .008), and dual therapy group had better compliance (96.3% vs 92.3%, P = .019). Antibiotic resistance and poor compliance were also associated with treatment failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual therapy (esomeprazole and amoxicillin four times daily) was non-inferior to, and even superior to TPB therapy as first-line H pylori eradication.

14-Day High-Dose Amoxicillin- and Metronidazole-Containing Triple Therapy With or Without Bismuth as First-Line Helicobacter pylori Treatment

BACKGROUND

Amoxicillin, metronidazole, proton pump inhibitor, bismuth quadruple therapy had been shown to reliably achieve high eradication rates. The role of individual components remains undefined.

AIM

To identify the additional benefit/role of bismuth in amoxicillin, metronidazole, proton pump inhibitor, bismuth quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) treatment.

METHODS

This was a non-inferiority factorial design trial. Treatment-naive H. pylori-infected subjects were randomly (1:1) assigned to receive 14-day amoxicillin- and metronidazole-containing triple therapy consisting of esomeprazole 20 mg twice a day, amoxicillin 1 g, and metronidazole 400 mg both thrice daily with or without 220 mg bismuth twice a day. Six weeks after treatment, H. pylori eradication was assessed by ¹³C-urea breath test. Antimicrobial susceptibility was assessed by the twofold agar dilution method.

RESULTS

From July 2018 to June 2019, a total of two hundred and sixteen subjects were randomized. Both therapies achieved high eradication rates. Per-protocol with bismuth = 97.9% (94/96, 95% CI 95.1-100%) and without bismuth = 94.7% (90/95, 95% CI 90.3-99.1%) (P = 0.43). Intent-to-treat analysis = 90.7% (98/108, 95% CI 85.2-96.2%) versus 88.9% (96/108, 95% CI 82.8-95.0%) with and without bismuth (P = 0.65). The two regimens were not inferior by intent-to-treat or per-protocol analyses. Metronidazole resistance did not affect the efficacy of either therapy.

CONCLUSION

Neither the presence nor absence of bismuth or metronidazole resistance reduced the effectiveness of triple therapy containing esomeprazole 20 mg twice a day, amoxicillin 1 g, and metronidazole 400 mg thrice daily in this population. The clinical trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03557437.

Efficacy and safety of bismuth-containing quadruple treatment and concomitant treatment for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Bismuth-containing quadruple treatment (BQT) and concomitant treatment (CT) were recommended as alternative first-line treatments of Helicobacter pylori (H. Pylori). A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the cure rates and compare efficacy and safety of BQT and CT for H. Pylori eradication. PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases were searched on June 16, 2020. Meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and subgroup analysis were conducted by Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 11.0. Ten studies were collected. We found no difference of cure rate between BQT and CT in intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis (84.6% vs. 82.9%, OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.94-1.38; P = 0.19) and marginally statistical difference in per-protocol (PP) analysis (92.4% vs 90.1%, OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.00-1.73; P = 0.05). Based on the results of subgroup analyses, we found statistical difference of eradication rate between BQT and CT (amoxicillin + clarithromycin + metronidazole + PPI treatment) according to PP analysis (94.3% vs. 91.5%, OR = 1.49, 95% CI:1.03-2.15; P = 0.03) and marginally statistical difference according to ITT analysis (87.5% vs. 84.6%, OR = 1.28, 95% CI:1.00-1.65; P = 0.05). BQT and CT may be both good treatment options for H. pylori infection. However, BQT was superior to current scheme of CT (amoxicillin + clarithromycin + metronidazole + PPI treatment) in subgroup analysis. It is very necessary to choose tailored therapy as an outstanding way to reduce the impact of antibiotic.

Empirical or susceptibility-guided treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection? A comprehensive review

Although susceptibility-guided therapy is frequently recommended for Helicobacter pylori infection, the evidence available to date supporting this strategy is limited. The aim of the present article is to review the advantages and limitations of the susceptibility-guided and the empirical strategies to treat this infection. We performed a bibliographic search to identify studies investigating H. pylori susceptibility-guided therapy. Culture is not the only way to assess antibiotic resistance, as different polymerase chain reaction-based approaches have been developed as alternative methods. For detecting H. pylori antimicrobial resistance, a molecular approach based on a stool sample might enable more convenient, time-saving methods. Unfortunately, the antimicrobial susceptibility cannot be obtained in all cases. Furthermore, antibiotic susceptibility testing in clinical practice yields useful information only for a few antibiotics: clarithromycin, metronidazole, and quinolones. In addition, susceptibility towards clarithromycin and metronidazole in vitro does not necessarily lead to eradication in vivo. In the case of H. pylori therapy failure, we should not re-administer any of the antibiotics against which H. pylori has probably become resistant. Our updated meta-analysis showed that susceptibility-guided treatment is not better than empirical treatment of H. pylori infection in first-line therapy if the most updated quadruple regimens are empirically prescribed, and similar efficacy results were also demonstrated with the two strategies for second-line therapy. Cumulative H. pylori eradication rate with several successive rescue therapies empirically prescribed reaches almost 100%. Finally, the studies that have evaluated the cost-effectiveness of the susceptibility-guided treatment have achieved contradictory results. In summary, we can conclude that the evidence is too limited to support the generalized use of susceptibility-guided therapy for H. pylori treatment in routine clinical practice, either as first-line or as rescue treatment. Nevertheless, it would be recommended that susceptibility tests are performed routinely, even before prescribing first-line treatment, in specialized centers with an interest in H. pylori management.

Susceptibility-guided therapy for Helicobacter pylori-infected penicillin-allergic patients: A prospective clinical trial of first-line and rescue therapies

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) treatment remains a challenge for penicillin-allergic patients.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of susceptibility-guided first-line and rescue treatment in H pylori-infected penicillin-allergic patients.

METHODS

Consecutive H pylori-infected patients with penicillin allergy received a 14-day triple or quadruple therapy based on susceptibility to clarithromycin, levofloxacin, and metronidazole. All received esomeprazole 20 mg twice a day. Metronidazole-susceptible infections received metronidazole plus clarithromycin or levofloxacin triple therapy if susceptible. Clarithromycin- and levofloxacin-resistant infections received metronidazole plus tetracycline triple therapy. Metronidazole-resistant infections received a bismuth-high-dose metronidazole plus clarithromycin or levofloxacin quadruple therapy. Triple-resistant infections received classical bismuth quadruple therapy with high-dose metronidazole. Antimicrobial susceptibility was assessed using the E test method.

RESULTS

112 patients were entered (34.8% men, average 47.1 years). Infections in 83.8% (31/37) of treatment-naive subjects and 12.0% (9/75) (P < .001) receiving rescue treatment were susceptible to at least one of the three tested antibiotics. Overall, susceptibility-guided therapy achieved eradication rates of 92.9% (104/112, 95% CI 88.1%-97.7%) by intent-to-treat analysis and 99% (100/101, 95% CI 97.1%-100%) by per-protocol analysis. All regimens achieved eradication rates greater than 90% (P = .327) in the PP populations. Adverse events were relatively frequent; however, compliance remained high.

CONCLUSION

Susceptibility-guided therapy proved highly effective for penicillin-allergic patients. When available and proven locally effective, the alternative was empiric classical bismuth quadruple therapy. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03708848.

Evaluation of different proton pump inhibitors combined with bismuth quadruple regimens in Helicobacter pylori eradication

To evaluate the efficacy and economics of different proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) combined with bismuth quadruple regimens for Helicobacter pylori (Hp) eradication, a retrospective analysis method was used to collect Hp-positive patients who were treated with a bismuth-containing quadruple regimen (PPIs + amoxicillin + furazolidone + colloid pectin bismuth) from the outpatient department of gastroenterology in our hospital from January to June 2017. A total of 1410 patients were included in the study and divided into four groups according to different PPIs: group A (pantoprazole sodium enteric-coated capsules, 352 cases), group B (esomeprazole magnesium enteric-coated tablets, 462 cases), group C (pantoprazole sodium enteric-coated tablets, 392 cases) and group D (rabeprazole sodium enteric-coated tablets, 204 cases). The eradication rate of Hp and cost-saving in each group were then compared. There were no significant differences of gender (P = 0.526) and age (P = 0.366) between each Hp treatment regimen. The eradication rates of groups A, B, C and D were 91.48%, 89.83%, 86.73% and 90.69%, respectively. No statistical differences of Hp eradication rates were observed between each group yet (P > 0.05). However, the cost of group A was the lowest. In the present study, the Hp eradication rates between different PPIs regimens were similar in treating Hp infection. Nevertheless, the point in favor of pantoprazole capsules is the slightly higher Hp eradication rate and lower drug cost than other PPIs, which provides a significant evidence for the clinical medication decision in treating Hp infection.