Role of quantitative hepatitis B core antibody levels in predicting significant liver inflammation in chronic hepatitis B patients with normal or near-normal alanine aminotransferase levels

Quantitative hepatitis B core antibody and quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen: Novel viral biomarkers for chronic hepatitis B management

The management of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection now involves regular and appropriate monitoring of viral activity, disease progression, and treatment response. Traditional HBV infection biomarkers are limited in their ability to predict clinical outcomes or therapeutic effectiveness. Quantitation of HBV core antibodies (qAnti-HBc) is a novel non-invasive biomarker that may help with a variety of diagnostic issues. It was shown to correlate strongly with infection stages, hepatic inflammation and fibrosis, chronic infection exacerbations, and the presence of occult infection. Furthermore, qAnti-HBc levels were shown to be predictive of spontaneous or treatment-induced HBeAg and HBsAg seroclearance, relapse after medication termination, re-infection following liver transplantation, and viral reactivation in the presence of immunosuppression. qAnti-HBc, on the other hand, cannot be relied on as a single diagnostic test to address all problems, and its diagnostic and prognostic potential may be greatly increased when paired with qHBsAg. Commercial qAnti-HBc diagnostic kits are currently not widely available. Because many methodologies are only semi-quantitative, comparing data from various studies and defining universal cut-off values remains difficult. This review focuses on the clinical utility of qAnti-HBc and qHBsAg in chronic hepatitis B management.

Serum CXCL16: A new predictor of liver inflammation in patients with chronic hepatitis B

The prompt initiation of antiviral therapy is essential in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), especially when severe liver inflammation is detected. However, transcutaneous liver puncture, the gold standard for assessing liver inflammation, is invasive and its widespread application is limited. Therefore, there is an urgent need for more non-invasive markers to predict liver inflammation. In our retrospective cross-sectional study, which included 120 CHB patients and 31 healthy subjects, we observed a significant increase in serum chemokine C-X-C-motif ligand 16 (CXCL16) in CHB patients compared to healthy controls (p < .001). Notably, patients with severe inflammation (Scheuer's grade G ≥ 3, n = 26) exhibited a substantial increase in serum CXCL16 compared to those with non-severe inflammation (Scheuer's grade G < 3, n = 96) [(median, IQR), 0.42 (0.24-0.71) ng/mL vs. 1.01 (0.25-2.09) ng/mL, p < .001]. Furthermore, we developed a predictive model that combined CXCL16 with platelet count (PLT), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and albumin (ALB) to accurately predict liver inflammation in CHB patients. This model was more effective than ALT alone in predicting liver inflammation (AUC, 0.92 vs. 0.81, p = .015). Additionally, using an HBV-transduced mouse model, we demonstrated that blocking CXCL16 led to a reduction in liver inflammation and impaired infiltration and function of natural killer T (NKT) and natural killer (NK) cells. These findings suggest that CXCL16 is a promising non-invasive biomarker of liver inflammation in CHB patients and may play a role in inducing liver inflammation via a NKT and NK cell pathway.

Hepatitis B Core Antibody Level: A Surrogate Marker for Host Antiviral Immunity in Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infections

The hepatitis B virus core protein (HBcAg) is a highly immunogenic particulate antigen. Nearly all patients with persistent or resolved hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection show seropositivity for hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc), which appears in the early stage of infection and is mostly present for life. Traditionally, the anti-HBc is regarded as an evidential serological marker of HBV infections. In the last ten years, several studies revealed the predictive value of quantitative anti-HBc (qAnti-HBc) level in the treatment response and clinical outcome of chronic HBV infections, implying new insights into this classic marker. Overall, qAnti-HBc should be regarded as an indicator of the host's immune response specific to HBV, which correlates with HBV-related hepatitis activity and liver pathology. This review summarized the latest understanding of the clinical values of qAnti-HBc for differentiating the CHB phase, predicting treatment response, and providing disease prognosis. Moreover, we also discussed the possible mechanism of qAnti-HBc regulation during different courses of HBV infection.

Clinical Utility of Quantitative HBV Core Antibodies for Solving Diagnostic Dilemmas

The present-day management of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection relies on constant and appropriate monitoring of viral activity, disease progression and treatment response. Traditional HBV infection biomarkers have many limitations in predicting clinical outcomes or therapy success. Quantitation of HBV core antibodies (qAnti-HBc) is a new non-invasive biomarker that can be used in solving multiple diagnostic problems. It was shown to correlate well with infection phases, level of hepatic inflammation and fibrosis, exacerbations during chronic infection and presence of occult infection. Further, the level of qAnti-HBc was recognised as predictive of spontaneous or therapy-induced HBeAg and HBsAg seroclearance, relapse after therapy discontinuation, re-infection after liver transplantation and viral reactivation upon immunosuppression. However, qAnti-HBc cannot be relied upon as a single diagnostic test to solve all dilemmas, and its diagnostic and prognostic power can be much improved when combined with other diagnostic biomarkers (HBV DNA, HBeAg, qHBsAg and anti-HBs antibodies). The availability of commercial qAnti-HBc diagnostic kits still needs to be improved. The comparison of results from different studies and definitions of universal cut-off values continue to be hindered because many methods are only semi-quantitative. The clinical utility of qAnti-HBc and the methods used for its measurement are the focus of this review.

Serum qAnti-HBc combined with ALT and HBsAg predicts significant hepatic inflammation in HBeAg-positive immune active patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Quantitative hepatitis B core antibody (qAnti-HBc) level has been reported to predict significant liver inflammation in treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B patients. However, little evidence has been revealed that qAnti-HBc alone or with other serum parameters in predicting moderate to severe hepatic inflammation in HBeAg-positive immune active patients treated with entecavir (ETV).

METHODS

A total of 142 patients with HBeAg-positive immune active hepatitis were recruited in our study. Serum liver biochemistry, qAnti-HBc, hepatitis B virus markers, and liver inflammation were evaluated during 48-week ETV treatment. The association between liver inflammation grades and serum markers was systematically analyzed.

RESULTS

The patients with moderate to severe inflammation (≥ G2) had a significantly higher level of qAnti-HBc compared with those with no to mild liver inflammation patients (< G2). The levels of qAnti-HBc and alanine transaminase (ALT) were positively correlated with hepatic inflammation grades, and qAnti-HBc had a better correlation than ALT, whereas HBsAg was negatively correlated with hepatic inflammation grades before treatment. After 48-week ETV treatment, no correlation was observed between hepatic inflammation grades and qAnti-HBc, ALT, or HBsAg. The combination of qAnti-HBc, ALT, and HBsAg had better performance in predicting significant liver inflammation (≥ G2) than qAnti-HBc alone or its combination with ALT.

CONCLUSION

Serum qAnti-HBc levels were positively correlated with hepatic inflammation grades before treatment, but no positive correlation between them was observed after 48-week treatment. The level of qAnti-HBc combined with ALT and HBsAg may serve as a more reliable marker for identifying significant liver inflammation before treatment in HBeAg-positive immune active patients.

Virological Treatment Monitoring for Chronic Hepatitis B

More than 250 million people worldwide are currently infected with hepatitis B, despite the effectiveness of vaccination and other preventive measures. In terms of treatment, new therapeutic approaches are rapidly developing, promising to achieve the elimination of infected cells and the complete cure of infection. The on-treatment monitoring of these innovative antiviral treatments will require the implementation of new virological tools. Therefore, new biomarkers are being evaluated besides the traditional virological and serological assays in order to obtain information on different steps of the viral replication cycle and to monitor response to therapy more accurately. The purpose of this work is to describe both standard and innovative tools for chronic hepatitis B treatment monitoring, and to analyse their potential and feasibility.

Dose-response relationship between qAnti-HBc and liver inflammation in chronic hepatitis B with normal or mildly elevated ALT based on liver biopsy

BACKGROUND

The proportion of chronic hepatitis B(CHB) patients with normal or mildly elevated ALT(NMALT) levels who have moderate to severe inflammation was not rare. However, we lacked appropriate biomarkers to evaluate liver inflammation in these populations. We aimed to explore the relationship between quantitative hepatitis B core antibody(qAnti-HBc) and hepatic histological inflammation.

METHOD

This multi-center cohort study enrolled participants from 34 Chinese hospital including 1376 treatment-naive CHB patients with liver biopsy(934 with NMALT entered treatment-naive cohort; 423 with secondary liver biopsy entered treatment cohort). Using unadjusted and multivariate-adjusted generalized linear models, generalized additive models with smooth curve fitting, we evaluated the associations between qAnti-HBc and liver inflammation in these patients.

RESULTS

In the treatment-naive patients, qAnti-HBc was positively associated with liver inflammation(histology activity index[HAI] evaluated by Ishak scoring system)(fully-adjusted model: β=0.48, 95%CI[0.30-0.66], P<0.001). For per-SD increase in qAnti-HBc, the risk of moderate to severe inflammation(HAI≥5) increased by 56%(OR=1.56, 95%CI[1.28-1.91], P<0.001). The curve fitting indicated a significant "threshold effect" (inflection point was 4.5 log₁₀ IU/mL, P<0.001). Subgroup analyses and interactions were not significant(all P>0.05). In the treatment patients, there was no significant correlation between qAnti-HBc and liver inflammation, whether based on unadjusted, minimally-adjusted, or fully-adjusted models(all P>0.100). Paired analyses showed a significant correlation between decreasing in qAnti-HBc and alleviation of liver inflammation.

CONCLUSIONS

qAnti-HBc was positively correlated with liver inflammation in treatment-naive CHB patients with NMALT. The cutoff value of qAnti-HBc for the diagnosis of moderate to severe inflammation was 4.5 log₁₀ IU/mL. Decreasing in qAnti-HBc was positively correlated with liver inflammation relieving. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Presence of Liver Inflammation in Asian Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B With Normal ALT and Detectable HBV DNA in Absence of Liver Fibrosis

Liver biopsies are recommended to exclude significant liver inflammation in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) with elevated HBV DNA but without other indications for antiviral treatment. We aimed to investigate the proportions and determinants of significant inflammation in Asian patients with CHB with detectable HBV DNA. We conducted a cross‐sectional study that retrospectively included 581 patients with CHB with detectable HBV DNA who had undergone liver biopsy. Liver inflammation and fibrosis were staged by Scheuer’s classification. Significant inflammation and significant fibrosis were defined as G ≥ 2 and S ≥ 2, respectively. There were 179 (30.8%) patients with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) < 1 × upper limit of normal (ULN), 205 (35.3%) patients with ALT 1‐2 × ULN, and 197 (33.9%) patients with ALT > 2 × ULN. A total of 397 (68.3%) patients had significant inflammation, and 340 (58.5%) patients had significant fibrosis. Significant inflammation was found in 85% of patients with significant fibrosis and in 44.8% of patients without significant fibrosis. Furthermore, 28.7% of patients with CHB with detectable HBV DNA and normal ALT in the absence of significant fibrosis had significant inflammation. Moderate HBV DNA (5‐7 log₁₀ IU/mL) was a risk factor for significant inflammation (odds ratio [OR] 6.929, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.830‐16.966, P < 0.001) in patients with CHB with detectable HBV DNA, especially for patients with detectable HBV DNA and normal ALT in the absence of significant fibrosis (adjusted OR 13.161, 95% CI 1.026‐168.889, P = 0.048). Conclusion: A high proportion of CHB patients with detectable HBV DNA and normal ALT in the absence of significant fibrosis have significant liver inflammation. Liver biopsies are recommended to evaluate liver inflammation in such patients, especially for those with moderate HBV DNA.

Baseline serum hepatitis B core antibody level predicts HBeAg seroconversion in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B after antiviral treatment

Antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) is one of the most classical serological markers of HBV infection. This study aimed to investigate the association of serum anti-HBc and HBeAg seroconversion in patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) after antiviral treatment. Two hundred and seventeen HBeAg-positive CHB patients treated with entecavir (ETV) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) for 48 weeks were retrospectively enrolled. Serological response (SR) is defined as HBeAg seroconversion at 48 weeks of antiviral treatment. Serum anti-HBc level was measured using the Abbott ARCHITECT assay. After 48 weeks of antiviral treatment, twenty-two (10.1 %) patients achieved SR. Baseline level of serum anti-HBc in the SR patients (11.8 S/CO) was significantly higher than patients with non-SR (9.6 S/CO, P < 0.001). The median anti-HBc level was significantly declined after 48 weeks of antiviral therapy (9.9 vs. 8.9 S/CO, P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed baseline of serum anti-HBc was an independent predictor of SR (odds ratio [OR]: 1.462, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.170-1.825, P = 0.001). The area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of baseline anti-HBc level for predicting SR was 0.781 with the cut-off of 11.1 S/CO, with a sensitivity of 77.27 % and a specificity of 72.82 %. Our findings highlighted that baseline serum anti-HBc level is a promising indictor for predicting HBeAg seroconversion in HBeAg-positive CHB patients after antiviral treatment.

Prediction of hepatic inflammation in chronic hepatitis B patients with a random forest-backward feature elimination algorithm

BACKGROUND

Persistent liver inflammatory damage is the main risk factor for developing liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and even hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. Thus, accurate prediction of the degree of liver inflammation is a high priority and a growing medical need.

AIM

To build an effective and robust non-invasive model for predicting hepatitis B-related hepatic inflammation.

METHODS

A total of 650 treatment-naïve CHB (402 HBeAg-positive and 248 HBeAg-negative) patients who underwent liver biopsy were enrolled in this study. Histological inflammation grading was assessed by the Ishak scoring system. Serum quantitative hepatitis B core antibody (qAnti-HBc) levels and 21 immune-related inflammatory factors were measured quantitatively using a chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay. A backward feature elimination (BFE) algorithm utilizing random forest (RF) was used to select optional features and construct a combined model. The diagnostic abilities of the model or variables were evaluated based on the estimated area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) and compared using the DeLong test.

RESULTS

Four features were selected to predict moderate-to-severe inflammation in CHB patients using the RF-BFE method. These predictive features included qAnti-HBc, ALT, AST, and CXCL11. Spearman’s correlation analysis indicated that serum qAnti-HBc, ALT, AST, and CXCL11 levels were positively correlated with the histology activity index (HAI) score. These selected features were incorporated into the model to establish a novel model named I-3A index. The AUROC [0.822; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.790-0.851] of the I-3A index was significantly increased compared with qAnti-HBc alone (0.760, 95%CI: 0.724-0.792, P < 0.0001) in all CHB patients. The use of an I-3A index cutoff value of 0.41 produced a sensitivity of 69.17%, specificity of 81.44%, and accuracy of 73.8%. Additionally, the I-3A index showed significantly improved diagnostic performance for predicting moderate-to-severe inflammation in HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative CHB patients (0.829, 95%CI: 0.789-0.865 and 0.810, 95%CI: 0.755-0.857, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The selected features of the I-3A index constructed using the RF-BFE algorithm can effectively predict moderate-to-severe liver inflammation in CHB patients.

Clinical Non-invasive Model to Predict Liver Inflammation in Chronic Hepatitis B With Alanine Aminotransferase ≤ 2 Upper Limit of Normal

Background and Aim: Liver biopsy remains the gold standard for evaluating liver histology. However, it has certain limitations, and many patients refuse it. Non-invasive methods of liver evaluation are thus attracting considerable interest. In this study, we sought predictors of liver inflammation in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels ≤ 2-fold the upper limit of normal (ULN); these may guide decisions on whether to commence antiviral therapy.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 720 patients with CHB who underwent liver biopsy and whose ALT levels were ≤2 ULN. The patients were randomly divided into a training and validation set. We used univariate and multivariate regression analyses of data from the training set to construct a model that predicted significant (grade ≥2) liver inflammation, and validated the model employing the validation set.

Results: Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) level, prothrombin time (PT), glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) level, and anti-hepatitis B virus core antibody (anti-HBC) level were independent predictors of significant liver inflammation in CHB patients with ALT levels ≤ 2 ULN. A model featuring these four parameters afforded areas under the ROC curve of 0.767 and 0.714 for the training and validation sets. The model was more predictive than were the individual factors.

Conclusion: AST, GGT, anti-HBC, and PT reflect significant liver inflammation among CHB patients with ALT levels ≤ 2 ULN. Their combination indicates whether antiviral therapy is required.

Prognostic value of anti-HBc quantification in hepatitis B virus related acute-on-chronic liver failure

BACKGROUND AND AIM

It has been reported that serum quantification of anti-HBc (qAnti-HBc) could predict antiviral response in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients, while its role in hepatitis B virus-related acute-on-chronic liver failure (HBV-ACLF) remains unclear. Its implication in HBV-ACLF was evaluated in this study.

METHODS

Baseline serum qAnti-HBc levels were retrospectively detected in HBV-ACLF and CHB patients using recently developed double-sandwich immunoassay. The association of qAnti-HBc level with clinical outcomes was evaluated by multiple logistic regression. Nomogram was adopted to formulate an algorithm incorporating qAnti-HBc for the prediction of survival in HBV-ACLF. The post-hospitalization of HBV-ACLF patients were followed-up for 1 year.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight HBV-ACLF as training set, 80 HBV-ACLF as validation set and 216 CHB cases were included. Serum qAnti-HBc level was significantly higher in HBV-ACLF (4.95 ± 0.54 log₁₀  IU/mL) than CHB patients (4.47 ± 0.84 log₁₀  IU/mL) (P < 0.01). Among HBV-ACLF cases, both in training and validation set, patients with poor outcomes had lower qAnti-HBc level. Area under receiver operating characteristic curve of the novel qAnti-HBc inclusive model was 0.82, superior to 0.73 from model for end-stage liver disease scores (P = 0.018), which was confirmed in validation set. During follow-up, the qAnti-HBc level declined at month 3 and month 6, then plateaued at 3.84 log₁₀  IU/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum qAnti-HBc level was associated with disease severity and might be served as a novel biomarker in the prediction of HBV-ACLF clinical outcomes. The underlying immunological mechanism warrants further investigation.

Significant histological changes and satisfying antiviral efficacy in chronic hepatitis B virus infection patients with normal alanine aminotransferase. Antiviral therapy decision in chronic HBV patients with normal ALT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

A proportion of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection patients with normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) should start antiviral therapy based on liver biopsy. We aim to evaluate the proportion of such patients, find noninvasive methods for identifying and then evaluate antiviral efficacy.

METHODS

253 chronic HBV infection patients with normal ALT were analyzed at baseline and 57 patients with histological indication for antiviral therapy (Histology activity index ≥5 and/or Ishak fibrosis score ≥3) and 140 patients with elevated ALT received entecavir therapy and were followed-up to 78 weeks with a second liver biopsy in this multi-center study.

RESULTS

127 (50.2%) of 253 patients with normal ALT fulfilled histological indication for antiviral therapy. Aspartate aminotransferase (P=0.049), anti-hepatitis B virus core antibody (P=0.001) and liver stiffness measurement (P=0.000) were independent variables for identifying histological indication for antiviral therapy. A noninvasive model (AAF) performed best among independent variables and other noninvasive models with area under the operating characteristic curve of 0.887. Antiviral efficacy showed that 38 (66.7%) of 57 patients had undetectable HBV DNA. 12 (41.4%) of 29 patients who were hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive at baseline achieved HBeAg loss and 3 (10.3%) achieved HBeAg seroconversion. 25 (43.9%) of 57 patients achieved histological response. Moreover, 57 patients with normal ALT had a similar antiviral therapy efficacy with 140 patients with elevated ALT (P>0.1) except proportion of inflammation improvement and histological response (P=0.005, P=0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

Half of chronic HBV patients with normal ALT should start antiviral therapy based on liver biopsy. A noninvasive model could be used as a reliable tool for antiviral therapy decision. Patients with normal or elevated ALT had a similar antiviral efficacy.

A noninvasive model to predict liver histology for antiviral therapy decision in chronic hepatitis B with alanine aminotransferase < 2 upper limit of normal

BACKGROUND

At present, most assessments of liver fibrosis staging mainly focus on non-invasive diagnostic methods. This study aims to construct a noninvasive model to predict liver histology for antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) < 2 times upper limit of normal (ULN).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 577 patients with CHB who received liver biopsy and whose ALT was less than 2 ULN. Then they were randomly divided into a training group and a validation group. Through logistic regression analysis, a novel predictive model was constructed in the training group to predict significant changes in liver histology [necro-inflammatory activity grade (G) ≥ 2 or fibrosis stage (S) ≥ 2] and then validated in the validation group.

RESULTS

If liver biopsy showed moderate or severe inflammation or significant fibrosis, antiviral treatment was recommended. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), anti-hepatitis B virus core antibody (anti-HBC) and glutamine transpeptidase (GGT) were identified as independent predictors for antiviral therapy, with area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.649, 0.647 and 0.616, respectively. Our novel model index, which combined AST, anti- HBC and GGT with AUROC of 0.700 and 0.742 in training set and validation set.

CONCLUSIONS

This study established a noninvasive model to predict liver histology for antiviral treatment decision in patients with CHB with ALT < 2 ULN, which can reduce the clinical needs of liver biopsy.

The Multiple Functions of B Cells in Chronic HBV Infection

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is one of the main causes of liver diseases, of which the natural history and clinical outcomes are associated with the role of B cells. As humoral immune cells, B cells play a critical role in the process of anti-HBV antibody production. In addition, some studies have also characterized other B cell subsets involved in antigen presentation and regulating the immune response beyond antibody secretion. However, not all B cell subsets play a positive role in the immune response to chronic HBV infection, and various B cell subsets jointly mediate persistent HBV infection, tolerance, and liver damage. Thus, we further sought to elucidate the multiple functions of B cells to gain novel insight into the understanding of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) pathogenesis. We also reviewed the current immunotherapies targeting B cells to explore novel therapeutic interventions for the treatment of chronic HBV infection.

AST and HBeAg Level Can Help to Distinguish Non-Minimal Liver Inflammation in Persistently Normal Alanine Aminotransferase of Chronic HBV Infection

Objectives: The current study aimed to investigate the characteristics of HBV serum markers (HBsAg, HBeAg), biochemical indicators, HBV DNA, and the age to distinguish minimal from non-minimal liver histological inflammation group in HBeAg-positive chronic HBV-infected patients with ALT≤ 1ULN (40U/L). Methods: The HBeAg-positive patients with treatment-naïve hospitalized at Ditan hospital from January 2008 to January 2017 are investigated. Patients were separated into two groups of minimal and non-minimal (mild and moderate) histological inflammation group by liver biopsy specimens. Data were analyzed using the SPSS package. Results: There were both positive (age, ALT, and AST) and negative correlation factors (serum HBsAg, HBeAg, or HBV DNA quantitation) to the liver inflammation grades. Multivariate regression analysis indicated that HBeAg (P < 0.001, b = -0.554, Exp (B) = 0.575) and AST (P = 0.003, b = 0.074, Exp (B) = 1.077) were independent influential factors. The cutoff values of HBeAg and AST were separately 2.85 Log10S/CO (AUC0.724, Sensitivity64%, Specificity79%), 28U/L (AUC0.726, Sensitivity68%, Specificity 78%) to distinguish Minimal from Non-minimal liver histological inflammation in chronic HBV-infected patients with ALT ≤ 1 ULN (40U/L). Conclusions: In total, 31.34% (115/367) of patients with chronic HBV infection who had non-minimal (mild and moderate) liver histological inflammation reached the required inflammation levels for antiviral treatment in HBeAg-positive patients with persistently normal ALT. HBeAg (cutoff < 2.85 Log10S/CO) and AST (cutoff > 28 U/L) were the independent influential factors of predicting non-minimal liver inflammation with ALT ≤ 1 ULN (40U/L).

Quantitative HBcrAg and HBcAb versus HBsAg and HBV DNA in predicting liver fibrosis levels of chronic hepatitis B patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance of the quantitative markers of hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) and anti-hepatitis B core antigen antibodies HbcAb versus hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B virus DNA (HBV DNA) in predicting liver fibrosis levels in chronic hepatitis B patients.

METHODS

Two hundred and fifty hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and 245 HBeAg-negative patients were enrolled. With reference to the Scheuer standard, stage 2 or higher and stage 4 liver disease were defined as significant fibrosis and cirrhosis, respectively. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the performance of the HBV markers investigated.

RESULTS

The areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) of HBcrAg in predicting significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in HBeAg-positive patients (0.577 and 0.700) were both close to those of HBsAg (0.617 and 0.762) (both P> 0.05). In HBeAg-negative patients (0.797 and 0.837), they were both significantly greater than those of HBV DNA (0.723 and 0.738) (P=0.0090 and P=0.0079). The AUCs of HBcAb in predicting significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in HBeAg-positive patients (0.640 and 0.665) were both close to those of HBsAg. In HBeAg-negative patients (0.570 and 0.621), they were both significantly less than those of HBcrAg (P <0.0001 and P=0.0001). Specificity in predicting significant fibrosis and sensitivity in predicting cirrhosis in HBeAg-positive patients, using a single cut-off of HBsAg ≤5,000 IU/ml, were 76.5% and 72.7%, respectively. In HBeAg-negative patients, using a single cut-off of HBcrAg>80kU/ml, they were 85.9% and 81.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

HBsAg has good performance in predicting liver fibrosis levels in HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients, and HBcrAg has very good performance in predicting liver fibrosis levels in HBeAg-negative patients.

Association of Hepatitis B Core-Related Antigen and Antihepatitis B Core Antibody With Liver Fibrosis Evolution in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Hepatitis B Virus Coinfected Patients During Treatment With Tenofovir

Background

Quantitative hepatitis B core-related antigen (qHBcrAg) or antihepatitis B core antibody (qAnti-HBc) could be useful in monitoring liver fibrosis evolution during chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, yet it has not been assessed in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-HBV-coinfected patients undergoing treatment with tenofovir (TDF).

Methods

One hundred fifty-four HIV-HBV-infected patients initiating a TDF-containing antiretroviral regimen were prospectively followed. The qHBcrAg and qAnti-HBc and liver fibrosis assessment were collected every 6–12 months during TDF. Hazard ratios (HRs) assessing the association between qHBcrAg/qAnti-HBc and transitions from none/mild/significant fibrosis to advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis (progression) and from advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis to none/mild/significant fibrosis (regression) were estimated using a time-homogeneous Markov model.

Results

At baseline, advanced liver fibrosis/cirrhosis was observed in 40 (26%) patients. During a median follow-up of 48 months (interquartile range, 31–90), 38 transitions of progression (IR = 7/100 person-years) and 34 transitions of regression (IR = 6/100 person-years) were observed. Baseline levels of qHBcrAg and qAnti-HBc were not associated with liver fibrosis progression (adjusted-HR per log₁₀ U/mL = 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.93–1.24; adjusted-HR per log₁₀ Paul-Ehrlich-Institute [PEI] U/mL = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.70–1.04, respectively) or regression (adjusted-HR per log₁₀ U/mL = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.95–1.46; adjusted-HR per log₁₀ PEI U/mL = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.78–1.22, respectively) after adjusting for age, gender, duration of antiretroviral therapy, protease inhibitor-containing antiretroviral therapy, and CD4⁺/CD8⁺ ratio. Nevertheless, changes from the previous visit of qAnti-HBc levels were associated with liver fibrosis regression (adjusted-HR per log₁₀ PEIU/mL change = 5.46, 95% CI = 1.56–19.16).

Conclusions

Baseline qHBcrAg and qAnti-HBc levels are not associated with liver fibrosis evolution in TDF-treated HIV-HBV coinfected patients. The link between changes in qAnti-HBc levels during follow-up and liver fibrosis regression merits further study.

Monitoring of serum HBV RNA, HBcrAg, HBsAg and anti-HBc levels in patients during long-term nucleoside/nucleotide analogue therapy

BACKGROUND

This study was aimed at evaluating the clinical significance of serum HBV RNA, hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) and hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) levels in chronic hepatitis B patients with undetectable HBV DNA during nucleoside/nucleotide analogue (NA) treatment.

METHODS

Fifty-seven patients who received long-term NA treatment of median 5.83 (25%, 75% percentiles 4.67, 7.75) years were enrolled, and 285 serum samples at five time points for each patient were quantitatively analysed for the three serum markers together with serum HBV DNA and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels.

RESULTS

The HBV RNA level significantly correlated with HBcrAg (r=0.629; P<0.001) but not HBsAg levels (P=0.1460). Nonetheless, the HBcrAg level significantly correlated with the HBsAg level (r=0.469; P<0.001). Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive samples showed higher HBV RNA, HBcrAg and HBsAg levels than HBeAg-negative samples did (all P<0.05). Nine patients with HBeAg loss manifested a significantly greater decline in HBV RNA and HBcrAg levels (median 1.84 [25%, 75% percentiles 1.02, 2.12] log₁₀ copies/ml, 1.14 [0.62, 2.21] log₁₀ U/ml, respectively) compared with those in seven patients without HBeAg loss (0.74 [0.10, 1.08] log₁₀ copies/ml and 0.41 [0.21, 0.69] log₁₀ U/ml, respectively). Overall, serum HBV RNA, HBcrAg, HBsAg and anti-HBc levels gradually decreased with time during NA treatment. At the end of observation, HBV RNA and HBcrAg reached an undetectable level in 26 and 6 (46% and 11%) patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Monitoring of HBV RNA and HBcrAg levels is useful for NA-treated patients with undetectable HBV DNA. The attainment of HBV RNA undetectability usually occurs prior to HBcrAg undetectability.

Quantitative Anti-HBc in Liver Pathological States in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection

Background

Changes of hepatitis B core antigen antibody (anti-HBc) in liver pathological involvement in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection have not been investigated in detail. This study aimed to explore evolving patterns of anti-HBc following liver pathological states and to investigate validities of anti-HBc for predicting liver pathological states.

Methods

254 HBeAg-positive and 237 HBeAg-negative patients with chronic HBV infection were enrolled. Liver pathological diagnoses referred to Scheuer standard, and anti-HBc was measured using chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay.

Results

Anti-HBc was significantly positively correlated with pathological grades and stages in both HBeAg-positive (r_s = 0.312, P < 0.0001, and r_s = 0.268, P < 0.0001) and HBeAg-negative (r_s = 0.270, P < 0.0001, and r_s = 0.147, P=0.0237) patients. The medians of anti-HBc in pathological grades of G1, G2, and G3 and stages of S1, S2, S3, and S4 in HBeAg-positive patients were all significantly lower than those in HBeAg-negative patients (all P < 0.005). The areas under receiver-operating characteristic curves (95% confidence interval) of anti-HBc for predicting pathological grades ≥G2 and ≥G3, and stages ≥S2 and =S4 in HBeAg-positive patients were 0.683 (0.622–0.740) and 0.662 (0.601–0.720), and 0.627 (0.564–0.687) and 0.683 (0.622–0.740), respectively, and in HBeAg-negative patients were 0.681 (0.618–0.740) and 0.702 (0.639–0.760), and 0.569 (0.503–0.633) and 0.630 (0.565–0.691), respectively.

Conclusion

Following hepatic aggravation of necroinflammation and progression of fibrosis, anti-HBc increases gradually in HBeAg-positive patients and continues to increase gradually in HBeAg-negative patients, which is a useful but unsatisfactory marker for monitoring pathological states.

Quantitative of serum hepatitis B core antibody is a potential predictor of recurrence after interferon-induced hepatitis B surface antigen clearance

BACKGROUND

Recurrence is common for patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who achieved hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen (HBsAg) clearance after antiviral treatment. The aim of the study is to explore the possibility of quantitative hepatitis B core antibody (Anti-HBc) level as a biomarker to predict recurrence.

METHODS

A total of 73 patients with HBsAg clearance were enrolled in this study, 16 cases with recurrence and 57 cases of non-recurrence. A newly developed double-sandwich Anti-HBc immunoassay was used to detect the quantitative Anti-HBc level before therapy (baseline) and at the end of therapy. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the predictive ability of quantitative Anti-HBc levels for recurrence.

RESULTS

Quantitative Anti-HBc levels at the end of therapy in both recurrence and non-recurrence groups were significantly lower than those of before therapy (P < 0.001). In addition, the declining trend of the recurrence group was significantly greater than that of the non-recurrence group (0.71 log10 vs. 0.45 log10 IU/mL, P = 0.026). Quantitative Anti-HBc levels in non-recurrence group were higher than those in recurrence group at baseline and drug withdrawal (P = 0.023, P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that Anti-HBc level at drug withdrawal alone was associated with recurrence (OR = 0.116, P = 0.037). At Anti-HBc level >2.3386 log10 IU/mL, the predictive sensitivity and specificity for recurrence were 80.0% and 71.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative Anti-HBc level can be used as a potential predictor of recurrence after HBsAg clearance. Anti-HBc level at the drug withdrawal has better predictive value than the baseline.

Correlation between serum Hcy level and severity of chronic HBV hepatitis

Objective The aim of this work was to investigate the serum homocysteine (Hcy) level and severity of hepatitis B virus (HBV).

Methods 72 patients with chronic HBV and 28 healthy controls were included in this work. Of the included 72 chronic HBV hepatitis patients, 20 patients had mild disease, 31 had moderate disease and 21 had severe disease. The serum homocysteine (Hcy), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and total bilirubin (TBIL) were examined in both HBV hepatitis and control patients.

Results Significant statistical difference was observed for serum Hcy, ALT, AST and TBIL in different groups (p<0.05). The serum Hcy, ALT, AST and TBIL in the severe group were significantly higher than those of other groups with statistical difference (p<0.05); significant correlation was observed between serum Hcy and AST in the moderate (r=0.43, p<0.05) and severe disease groups (r=0.63, p<0.05). However, the correlation between Hcy and ALT, and Hcy andTBIL were not statistically significant in any group (p>0.05).

Conclusion The serum Hcy level in patients with hepatitis B reflects the damage to the of liver. The continuous increase of serum Hcy level can be regarded as a risk factor for the progression of hepatitis, and it can be used as serological marker for clinical diagnosis, treatment and prognosis.

Hepatitis B virus infected patients show increased risk of cerebral aneurysm rupture: A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

The mechanism responsible for cerebral aneurysm (CA) formation and rupture remains unclear. Some studies showed vascular involvement could be observed in systemic vasculitis caused by Hepatitis B. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the possibility by which hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection might be associated with CA.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively studied patient details and serological markers of HBV infection among 229 patients presenting with CA on admission to the Neurosurgery Department at Beijing Tiantan Hospital between March 2016 and February 2017. Clinical data, radiologic findings and clinical features of HBV infection were analyzed by SPSS. The results showed a significant association between HBsAg positive (p = 0.014), anti-HBc positive (p = 0.045) and CA rupture. Univariate analysis revealed patients that were HBsAg positive (OR: 4.828; 95% CI: 1.363-17.099; p = 0.015) and anti-HBc positive (OR: 1.804; 95% CI: 1.010-3.223; p = 0.046) were associated with CA rupture. Compared with other confounding risk factors for rupture in the statistical analysis, HBsAg positive status (OR: 4.085; 95% CI: 1.011-16.513; p = 0.048) remained positively associated with CA rupture.

CONCLUSIONS

Observation showed that HBsAg positivity was associated with CA rupture.

Recent advances in assessment and treatment of chronic hepatitis B

This paper reviews the recent advances in the assessment and treatment of chronic hepatitis B with regard to predicting inflammation and fibrosis with non-invasive biomarkers and transient elastography, clinical benefits of long-term nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) antiviral therapy, serological benefits (HBeAg and HBsAg loss) of concurrent or sequential NAs and pegylated interferon, as well as risk factors for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Clinical noninvasive markers for antiviral therapy decision in chronic hepatitis B with alanine aminotransferase less than two times upper limit of normal

Liver biopsy is the reference method for antiviral therapy decision-making in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) when alanine aminotransferase (ALT) is less than two times of upper limit of normal (<2ULN). Our aim was to explore noninvasive markers for antiviral therapy decision in CHB with ALT <2ULN. A total of 452 treatment-naïve CHB patients with ALT < 2ULN who had undergone liver biopsy were analysed in this prospective multi-centre study. If liver biopsy showed moderate or severe inflammation (histology activity index ≥ 5) or significant fibrosis (Ishak fibrosis score ≥ 3), antiviral treatment was recommended. We analysed data using univariate and multivariate analyses and receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC). Two hundred and sixty-nine (59.5%) of 452 cases with ALT < 2ULN had moderate, severe or significant inflammation. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (P = 0.03), anti-hepatitis B virus core antibody (anti-HBc) (P = 0.003) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) (P = 0.000) were independent variables for antiviral therapy decision-making, with area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.718, 0.703 and 0.819, respectively. Our novel AAF index, which combined AST, anti-HBc and LSM, showed better performance with AUROC of 0.876, 0.877 and 0.876 in estimation, validation and total set. Finally, 247 (54.6%) of 452 patients could avoid liver biopsy based on AAF index. Furthermore, performances of 23 noninvasive models were unsatisfactory for antiviral therapy decision with AUROC < 0.800, which were inferior to AAF index. In conclusion, AST, anti-HBc and LSM were related to antiviral therapy decision-making among CHB patients with ALT < 2ULN. Thus, the novel AAF index was a more reliable noninvasive model for antiviral therapy decision-making.

New and Old Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection

Tests to detect the presence and activity of hepatitis B virus (HBV) are the cornerstones of diagnosis and management. Assays that detect or measure serum levels of HB surface antigen, HB surface antibody, and HB core antibody are used to identify patients with exposure to HBV, whereas other tests provide information on the level of virus replication, presence of specific variants, and presence of virus reservoirs. Newer diagnostic tests, used only in research settings so far, aim to quantify levels of intrahepatic HBV replication. Other tests have been developed to detect HBV infection in resource-limited settings. We review point-of-care tests (essential in global screening efforts), standard diagnostic tests used in routine clinical management, and newer tests that might be used in clinical trials of agents designed to cure HBV infection.

New viral biomarkers for Hepatitis B: Are we able to change practice?

The management of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is challenged by its varying natural course and its stealthy nature. Not all HBV-infected patients will develop complications of infection; however, it is of utmost importance to identify patients who are at risk and require antiviral treatment and/or close surveillance. Hepatic inflammation and quantification of HBV DNA have guided treatment decisions in the last decade, and these guided interventions have been shown to reduce liver-related complications and death. Data on the quantification of additional HBV markers such as hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) and hepatitis B virus RNA (HBV RNA) have accumulated in recent years. Here, we review the current evidence of how to use these markers and discuss open issues that require additional research.

A novel index using routine clinical parameters for predicting significant liver inflammation in chronic hepatitis B

Identifying the degree of liver inflammation is critical for therapeutic judgement of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). However, we lack indexes which can accurately predict significant liver inflammation in patients with CHB. This study aimed to develop a simple predictive index for liver inflammation in CHB using routine clinical parameters. A total of 519 patients with CHB who underwent liver biopsy were enrolled and randomly divided into training (n = 346) and validation cohorts (n = 173). Based on routine clinical parameters, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT; P = 0.031) and platelets (PLT; P < 0.001) were identified as independent predictors of significant inflammation by multivariable analysis in the training cohort. Accordingly, the GGT to PLT ratio (GPR) was developed to amplify the opposing effects for predicting liver inflammation. In the training cohort, the AUCs of GPR in predicting significant inflammation were 0.791 (95% CI: 0.742-0.839), 0.783 (95% CI: 0.717-0.849) and 0.791 (95% CI: 0.716-0.867) in the entire patients with CHB, HBeAg-positive CHB patients and HBeAg-negative CHB patients, respectively. The diagnostic performance of GPR for significant inflammation was significantly superior to that of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST) and GGT in all patients with CHB and HBeAg-positive CHB patients, but was comparable with ALT, AST and GGT in HBeAg-negative CHB patients. In the validation cohort, the diagnostic performance of GPR in assessing significant liver inflammation was also superior to other indexes in all patients with CHB and HBeAg-positive CHB patients, but was comparable with GGT in HBeAg-negative CHB patients. Thus, GPR can be a novel and simple index for predicting significant liver inflammation in CHB, especially for HBeAg-positive CHB.

A promising non-invasive index for predicting liver inflammation in chronic hepatitis B patients with alanine aminotransferase ≤2 upper limit of normal

Inexpensive and simple non-invasive indexes for predicting liver inflammation are urgently required, but have been poorly studied in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with alanine transaminase (ALT) ≤2 times the upper limit of normal (ULN). A total of 356 CHB patients with ALT ≤2 ULN who presented at Huashan Hospital (n=181) and the First Hospital of Quanzhou (n=175) were enrolled and randomly divided into an experimental assessment cohort (n=238) and validation cohort (n=118) at a ratio of 2:1. Histological analysis of liver tissue was performed to determine the pathological stage according to the Scheuer scoring system. For the experimental assessment cohort, univariate and multivariate analysis identified aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and albumin (ALB) as independent predictors of liver necroinflammation [liver necroinflammation grade (G)≥2] in patients with ALT ≤2 ULN. Therefore, a novel index, the AST-to-ALB ratio (ATAR), was proposed, which had a better diagnostic performance [area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)=0.721] than that of ALB (AUC=0.632; P=0.039 vs. ATAR) and AST (AUC=0.682; P=0.082 vs. ATAR). In the validation cohort, the AUC of ATAR (0.728) to identify patients with a G≥2 was slightly greater than that of AST (0.660; P=0.149 vs. ATAR) and ALB (0.672; P=0.282 vs. ATAR). Furthermore, a similar diagnostic superiority was also demonstrated in patients with ALT ≤1 ULN. Thus, ATAR may be a promising non-invasive surrogate marker for liver necroinflammation CHB patients with ALT ≤2 ULN and thereby determine whether anti-viral treatment should be initiated.