Portal hypertension in hepatitis B-related cirrhosis: Diagnostic accuracy of liver and spleen stiffness by 2-D shear-wave elastography

Validation of Baveno VII criteria for clinically significant portal hypertension by two-dimensional shear wave elastography

BACKGROUND

The Baveno VII consensus proposed criteria for the non-invasively diagnosis of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD). The performance of Baveno VII criteria for assessing CSPH by two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) had not been well validated. We aimed to validate the performance of Baveno VII criteria for rule-in and rule-out CSPH by 2D-SWE.

METHOD

This is an international multicenter study including cACLD patients from China and Croatia with paired liver stiffness measurement (LSM), spleen stiffness measurement (SSM) by 2D-SWE, and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) were included. CSPH was defined as HVPG ≥ 10 mmHg.

RESULT

A total of 146 patients with cACLD were enrolled, and finally 118 patients were included in the analysis. Among them, CSPH was documented in 79 (66.9%) patients. Applying the Baveno VII criteria for rule-out CSPH by 2D-SWE, [LSM ≤ 15 kPa and platelet count ≥ 150 × 109/L] OR SSM < 21 kPa, could exclude CSPH with sensitivity > 90% (93.5 or 98.7%) but negative predictive value < 90% (74.1 or 85.7%). Using the Baveno VII criteria for rule-in CSPH by 2D-SWE, LSM ≥ 25 kPa OR SSM ≥ 50 kPa, could diagnose CSPH with 100% specificity and 100% positive predictive values.

CONCLUSION

Baveno VII criteria by 2D-SWE showed a good diagnostic performance for ruling in but not for ruling out CSPH, which might become an emerging non-invasive elastography tool to select the patients who needed non-selective beta blocker therapy.

Relationship Between Spleen Pathologic Changes and Spleen Stiffness in Portal Hypertension Rat Model

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study described here was to explore the influence of splenic pathology and hemodynamic parameters on spleen stiffness in portal hypertension (PH).

METHODS

A Sprague‒Dawley rat model of PH (n = 34) induced by CCl4 was established, and 9 normal rats were used as controls. All animals underwent a routine ultrasound examination, spleen stiffness measurement (SSM), liver stiffness measurement (LSM), portal vein pressure (PVP) measurement and histopathologic assessment. The diagnostic performance of SSM and LSM in PH was evaluated. SSMs were compared among the groups at different pathologic and hemodynamic levels. Multiple linear regression was used to analyze the factors affecting SSM.

RESULTS

SSM had excellent diagnostic efficacy for PH (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.900) and was superior to LSM (AUC = 0.794). In a rat model of PH, pathologic changes such as splenic sinus widening, thickening of the splenic capsule and an increase in collagen fibers were observed in the spleen. There were significant differences in SSM at different splenic capsule thicknesses and splenic sinus widths (all p values <0.05), but there were no significant differences in the SSM at different levels of the splenic collagen fiber area and red pulp area (all p values >0.05). In addition, there were significant differences in SSM at different levels of portal vein diameter, blood flow and congestion index (all p values <0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that PVP, portal vein congestion index and splenic capsule thickness were significantly associated with SSM.

CONCLUSION

SSM is a good non-invasive way to assess PH. PVP, splenic capsule thickness and portal vein congestion index are responsible for spleen stiffness but not the proliferation of splenic fibrous tissue.

Use of Sound Touch Elastography and Sound Touch Quantification for the Noninvasive Evaluation of Portal Hypertension in a Rat Model

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we used the recently developed ultrasound elastography techniques sound touch elastography (STE) and sound touch quantification (STQ) to quantify portal hypertension (PHT) severity in a rat model of carbon tetrachloride (CCl₄ )-induced cirrhotic PHT.

METHODS

In total, 60 rats were used. Various degrees of PHT were established. Liver and spleen stiffness were measured by STE (L-STE and S-STE, respectively) and STQ (L-STQ and S-STQ, respectively). We measured portal pressure (PP) after ultrasonographic examination. The performance of the STE and STQ parameters in the identification of PHT was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses.

RESULTS

Liver and spleen stiffness measurements obtained with STE and STQ correlated positively with the PP (r = 0.566-0.882, all P < .001). The areas under ROC curves for L-STE, S-STE, L-STQ, and S-STQ values were 0.931 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.847-1.000), 0.982 (95% CI, 0.956-1.000), 0.796 (95% CI, 0.680-0.912), and 0.925 (95% CI, 0.858-0.993), respectively, for PP ≥5 mmHg; 0.937 (95% CI, 0.865-1.000), 0.938 (95% CI, 0.864-1.000), 0.967 (95% CI, 0.923-1.000), and 0.960 (95% CI, 0.897-1.000), respectively, for PP ≥10 mmHg; and 0.954 (95% CI, 0.897-1.000), 0.790 (95% CI, 0.652-0.928), 0.808 (95% CI, 0.680-0.935), and 0.740 (95% CI, 0.595-0.885), respectively, for PP ≥12 mmHg.

CONCLUSIONS

STE and STQ are reliable noninvasive tools for the assessment of PHT severity, especially for PP ≥10 mmHg, in a rat model of CCl₄ -induced cirrhotic PHT.

Diagnostic accuracy of liver stiffness on two-dimensional shear wave elastography for detecting clinically significant portal hypertension: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) has recently been proposed to detect clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH), we aimed to perform a meta-analysis based on the published data to assess the diagnostic accuracy of 2D-SWE for detecting CSPH.

METHOD

Literature databases were searched up until 1 August 2021. The summary area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC), the summary diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the summary sensitivity and specificity were used to examine the accuracy of 2D-SWE for evaluating CSPH. Heterogeneity was explored using meta-regression.

RESULTS

Finally 9 studies with 956 patients were included in this study for evaluation and meta-analysis. 2D-SWE showed good diagnostic performance for detecting CSPH with a summary sensitivity of 83% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 76%-88%) and summary specificity of 78% (95% CI: 65%-87%); the summary AUROC was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.84-0.90). Summary positive likelihood ratio (LR), negative LR, and DOR of 2D-SWE for detecting CSPH were 3.7 (95% CI: 2.4-5.9), 0.22 (95% CI: 0.16-0.30), and 17 (95% CI: 10-29), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

2D-SWE showed good performance in diagnosing CSPH and can be considered as an important and noninvasive adjunctive approach in the management of patients with CSPH.

Limited diagnostic value of liver stiffness for clinically significant portal hypertension in HBV-related cirrhosis

PURPOSE

Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is the gold standard for portal pressure in cirrhosis, but most previous studies focused on the diagnostic value of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) based on the correlation between liver stiffness (LS) and HVPG in hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients and alcoholic liver. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify the diagnostic value of LS for CSPH and the correlation with HVPG in hepatitis B virus (HBV) patients.

METHODS

A total of 137 patients from the Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital were divided into HBV group and non-HBV group according to etiology. Correlation analysis and ROC were used to analyze the correlation between LS and HVPG and the diagnostic value of CSPH.

RESULTS

There was a good correlation between LS and HVPG in the total cohort and non-HBV cohort (r = 0.398, P < 0.001; r = 0.575, P < 0.001, respectively). However, the correlation between LS and HVPG was acceptable in the HBV cohort (r = 0.316, P = 0.002). When adjustment for age, MELD score, and INR, the result was still the same. Similar results were observed in the prediction for CSPH. LS showed good diagnostic value for CSPH in the total cohort and non-HBV cohort (AUC = 0.732, AUC = 0.829, respectively). However, it performed poorly in the HBV cohort (AUC = 0.689).

CONCLUSION

The etiology of HBV might affect the diagnostic performance of LS for predicting CSPH.

Network Meta-Analysis: Noninvasive Imaging Modalities for Identifying Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Although measurement of the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is the current reference standard for obtaining portal venous pressures, several noninvasive imaging-based modalities have been proposed as alternatives.

AIMS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive imaging approaches for identifying clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH).

METHODS

Two independent reviewers conducted a literature search of PubMed, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Library from inception until January 5, 2021. The following imaging modalities were compared to HVPG: computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), magnetic resonance elastography, ultrasound, transient elastography (TE), shear wave elastography (SWE), acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), and subharmonic-aided pressure estimation (SHAPE). Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) for summary receiver operating characteristic were calculated using both frequentist random effects and Bayesian network meta-analytic approaches.

RESULTS

We analyzed 45 studies of 5678 patients. A broad overlapping confidence interval (CI) of DOR was observed among different imaging modalities: ARFI (30.5; 95% CI 12.7-73.3), CEUS and SHAPE (21.1; 95% CI 6.4-69.8), TE of liver stiffness (21.1; 95% CI 13.3-33.5), CT and MRI (13.7; 95% CI 7.40-25.4), SWE of liver stiffness (10.5; 95% CI 5.2-21.1), and ultrasound (9.5; 95% CI 4.9-18.4). The AUC of all imaging methods exceeded 0.8, indicating very good performance. At a cutoff of 80% specificity, TE, CEUS, and SHAPE exceeded 80% sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

Overall, noninvasive imaging modalities perform well for identifying CSPH. Clinicians should consider these noninvasive and cost-efficient tests when diagnosing CSPH.

MR elastography outperforms shear wave elastography for the diagnosis of clinically significant portal hypertension

OBJECTIVES

Portal hypertension (PH) is associated with complications such as ascites and esophageal varices and is typically diagnosed through invasive hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement, which is not widely available. In this study, we aim to assess the diagnostic performance of 2D/3D MR elastography (MRE) and shear wave elastography (SWE) measures of liver and spleen stiffness (LS and SS) and spleen volume, to noninvasively diagnose clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) using HVPG measurement as the reference.

METHODS

In this prospective study, patients with liver disease underwent 2D/3D MRE and SWE of the liver and spleen, as well as HVPG measurement. The correlation between MRE/SWE measures of LS/SS and spleen volume with HVPG was assessed. ROC analysis was used to determine the utility of MRE, SWE, and spleen volume for diagnosing CSPH.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients (M/F 22/14, mean age 55 ± 14 years) were included. Of the evaluated parameters, 3D MRE SS had the strongest correlation with HVPG (r = 0.686, p < 0.001), followed by 2D MRE SS (r = 0.476, p = 0.004). 3D MRE SS displayed the best performance for diagnosis of CSPH (AUC = 0.911) followed by 2D MRE SS (AUC = 0.845) and 3D MRE LS (AUC = 0.804). SWE SS showed poor performance for diagnosis of CSPH (AUC = 0.583) while spleen volume was a fair predictor (AUC = 0.738). 3D MRE SS was significantly superior to SWE LS/SS (p ≤ 0.021) for the diagnosis of CSPH.

CONCLUSION

SS measured with 3D MRE outperforms SWE for the diagnosis of CSPH. SS appears to be a useful biomarker for assessing PH severity. These results need further validation.

KEY POINTS

• Spleen stiffness measured with 2D and 3D MR elastography correlates significantly with hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement. • Spleen stiffness measured with 3D MR elastography demonstrates excellent performance for the diagnosis of clinically significant portal hypertension (AUC 0.911). • Spleen stiffness measured with 3D MR elastography outperforms liver and spleen stiffness measured with shear wave elastography for diagnosis of clinically significant portal hypertension.

Detection of liver and spleen stiffness in rats with portal hypertension by two-dimensional shear wave elastography

BACKGROUND

The measurement of liver stiffness (LS) and spleen stiffness (SS) based on ultrasound elastography can be used for non-invasive assessment of portal hypertension (PH). However, there are few studies on the corresponding mechanism of increased spleen stiffness. Our aim was to use two-dimensional shear wave elastrography (2D-SWE) to evaluate the relationship between LS and SS and the severity of PH in rats. And explore the mechanism of the increase of LS and SS in PH.

METHODS

Sixty male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into portal hypertension (PH group, n = 45) and normal control (NC group, n = 15). At 12 weeks, LS and SS was detected by 2D-SWE in vivo. Related hemodynamic parameters and portal vein pressure (PVP) was measured. Spleen and liver 2D-SWE detection was performed again after sacrifice. Pathological changes were observed.

RESULTS

The SS and LS were increased in PH group (P < 0.05). The SS decreased after sacrifice, and what's more the magnitude of SS decline significantly higher in PH group than in NC group (P < 0.05). The correlation between SS and PVP is stronger than LS (r = 0.624, P < 0.001). SS has positive correlation with indexes of hyperdynamic circulation, but LS was weakly. The correlation between SS and the pathological grade (r = 0.633, P < 0.001) was lower than that in LS (r = 0.905, P < 0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that SS, portal vein inner diameter (PVD) and splenic vein blood flow velocity (SVV) were significantly associated with PH.

CONCLUSIONS

Spleen and liver measurement by 2D-SWE may be helpful in evaluating PVP. The correlation between SS and PVP is stronger than LS in rats measured by 2D-SWE. Hemodynamic circulation are important in the elevation of SS with portal hypertension. Pathological changes also have a degree of influence, but have more significance for the elevation of LS. SS may be a more effective noninvasive predictor of PH than LS.

Quantitative Assessment of Portal Hypertension by Two-Dimensional Shear Wave Elastography in Rat Models of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Comparison With Four Composite Scores

Background

Measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradients is the gold standard for assessing portal hypertension (PH) but is invasive with potential complications. We aimed to assess the performance in liver and spleen stiffness measurement (LSM and SSM, respectively) by two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) and composite scores including liver stiffness-spleen diameter to platelet ratio score (LSPS), platelet (PLT) count/spleen diameter ratio (PSR), aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase ratio (AAR), and AST-to-PLT ratio index (APRI) for diagnosing PH in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) rat models.

Methods

Animal models with PH in NAFLD were established in 65 rats, which then underwent 2D-SWE measurements. Morphological and biological parameters were collected for calculation of four composite scores. Correlations of noninvasive methods with portal venous pressure were evaluated by Spearman correlation analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to assess the performance of noninvasive methods in predicting PH.

Results

LSM and SSM were significantly associated with portal venous pressure (r = 0.636 and 0.602, respectively; all P < 0.001). The AUCs of LSM and SSM in the diagnosis of PH were 0.906 (95% confidence interval [CI]:0.841–0.97) and 0.87 (95% CI:0.776–0.964), respectively, and were significantly higher than those in composite scores. The AUCs for LSPS, PSR, AAR, and APRI were 0.793, 0.52, 0.668, and 0.533, respectively, for diagnosing PH. The AUCs of the combined models of LSM and SSM, LSM and PLT, SSM and PLT, and LSM, SSM and PLT were 0.923, 0.913, 0.872, and 0.923, respectively. The four combined models showed no statistical differences compared to LSM and SSM in evaluating PH (all P > 0.05).

Conclusions

LSM and SSM by 2D-SWE can be used as promising noninvasive parameters for diagnosing PH in NAFLD and have higher accuracy than composite scores. The combined models, compared to LSM and SSM, did not significantly improve the performance in diagnosing PH.

A Primer to the Diagnostic and Clinical Utility of Spleen Stiffness Measurement in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease

Content available: Author Audio Recording.

Assessment of liver fibrosis with liver and spleen stiffness measured by sound touch elastography, serum fibrosis markers in patients with chronic hepatitis B

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the performance of liver stiffness (LS) and spleen stiffness (SS) by using the sound touch elastography (STE) technique and compare with those of the splenic index, aspartate transaminase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, King's score and combined models for diagnosing and staging fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

METHODS

One hundred patients with CHB underwent STE and serological tests. LS and SS values were measured with STE technique, and splenic index was calculated. Staging of fibrosis was determined with liver biopsy. Correlations between the individual parameters and the stage of fibrosis were evaluated with the Spearman correlation analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was calculated to analyze the performance of all methods.

RESULTS

Among all individual parameters, LS showed the highest AUROC for diagnosing fibrosis of ≥S2, ≥S3, and S4 stages (AUROC: 0.70, 0.86, and 0.96, respectively; all P < 0.05). The AUROC of combined model 1 (LS and SS) and 2 (LS, SS, APRI, FIB-4 index, King's score) for diagnosing ≥S2, ≥S3, and S4 fibrosis were 0.70, 0.86, 0.97, and 0.70, 0.86, 0.96, respectively, which were higher than those of APRI, FIB-4 index and the King's score (P < 0.05). No significant differences were found between two combined models and LS for staging fibrosis (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

LS measurement is reliable for diagnosing and staging fibrosis in CHB, with a better performance than SS, splenic index and serum biomarkers. It is also comparable with the performance of combined models.

Noninvasive Detection of Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension in Compensated Advanced Chronic Liver Disease

Patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease have different prognoses depending on the presence of portal hypertension. Current non-invasive diagnostic methods allow identification of clinically significant portal hypertension. Portosystemic collaterals on imaging or liver stiffness of more than 20 to 25 kPa by using transient elastography identifies patients with clinically significant portal hypertension. Patients with liver stiffness of less than 20 kPa and platelet count of greater than 150 g/L can avoid endoscopy. This rule could be expanded using spleen stiffness. Methods to risk stratify for portal hypertension in compensated advanced chronic liver disease and successfully treated chronic hepatitis C and B are subject of research.

Noninvasive imaging assessment of portal hypertension

Portal hypertension (PH) is a spectrum of complications of chronic liver disease (CLD) and cirrhosis, with manifestations including ascites, gastroesophageal varices, splenomegaly, hypersplenism, hepatic hydrothorax, hepatorenal syndrome, hepatopulmonary syndrome and portopulmonary hypertension. PH can vary in severity and is diagnosed via invasive hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement (HVPG), which is considered the reference standard. Accurate diagnosis of PH and assessment of severity are highly relevant as patients with clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) are at higher risk for developing acute variceal bleeding and mortality. In this review, we discuss current and upcoming noninvasive imaging methods for diagnosis and assessment of severity of PH.

A window into portal hemodynamics in adult fontan patients?

BACKGROUND

Fontan circulation alters portal venous hemodynamics, causing chronic passive hepatic congestion and fibrosis. This congestion increases liver stiffness (LS) leading to overestimates of liver fibrosis as measured by ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) of the liver. We evaluated whether Fontan circulation has a similar effect on spleen stiffness (SS) and SS/LS ratio as measured by SWE.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared the SS of adult Fontan patients to age and gender matched, control patients without congenital heart disease. We correlated SS measurements to LS measurements and also performed a limited subgroup analysis of SS in Fontan patients with various manifestations of Fontan Associated Liver Disease.

RESULTS

SS in Fontan patients was similar to healthy controls (1.43 vs. 1.36 m/s, p = 0.26). LS was elevated in 78% of the Fontan patients (mean 1.68 m/s, SD 0.31, 95% CI 1.53-1.85). The correlation between LS and SS was modest (Pearson's correlation coefficient, r = 0.5) but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.06). The mean SS/LS ratio was 0.85 (95% CI 0.77-0.94).

CONCLUSION

Based on our study cohort, SS in Fontan patients is similar to age and gender matched control patients without congenital heart disease. The SS/LS ratio, however, is frequently less than 1, which is lower than that reported in both healthy patients and those with other forms of non-cardiac liver disease. SS and SS/LS ratio may be a useful indicator of portal hemodynamics in Fontan patients.

Diagnostic accuracy of spleen stiffness to evaluate portal hypertension and esophageal varices in chronic liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

To systematically review studies on the diagnostic accuracy of spleen stiffness measurement (SSM) for the detection of clinical significant portal hypertension (CSPH), severe portal hypertension (SPH), esophageal varices (EV), and high-risk esophageal varices (HREV) in patients with chronic liver diseases (CLD).

Methods

Through a systematic search, we identified 32 studies reporting the accuracy of SSM for the diagnosis of portal hypertension (PH) and/or EV in adults with CLD. A bivariate random-effects model was performed to estimate pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR). The clinical utility of SSM was evaluated by Fagan plot.

Results

A total of 32 studies assessing 3952 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivities of SSM were 0.85 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.69–0.93) for CSPH; 0.84 (95% CI, 0.75–0.90) for SPH; 0.90 (95% CI, 0.83–0.94) for any EV; and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.77–0.93) for HREV. The pooled specificities of SSM were 0.86 (95% CI, 0.74–0.93) for CSPH; 0.84 (95% CI, 0.72–0.91) for SPH; 0.73 (95% CI, 0.66–0.79) for EV; and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.53–0.77) for HREV. Summary PPV and NPV of SSM for detecting HREV were 0.54 (95% CI, 0.47–0.62) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.81–0.95), respectively.

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis suggests that SSM could be used as a helpful surveillance tool in management of CLD patients and was quite useful for ruling out the presence of HREV thereby avoiding unnecessary endoscopy.

Key Points

• SSM could be used to rule out the presence of HREV in patients with CLD thereby avoiding unnecessary endoscopy.

• SSM has significant diagnostic value for CSPH and SPH with high sensitivity and specificity in patients with CLD.

• SSM could be used as a helpful surveillance tool for clinicians managing CLD patients.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-020-07223-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Noninvasive Diagnostics for Portal Hypertension: A Comprehensive Review

Noninvasive diagnostics for portal hypertension include imaging and functional tests, as well as blood-based biomarkers, and capture different features of the portal hypertensive syndrome. Definitive conclusions regarding their clinical utility require assessment of their diagnostic value in specific clinical settings (i.e., diagnosing a particular hemodynamic condition within a well-defined target population). Several noninvasive methods are predictive of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH; hepatic venous pressure gradient [HVPG] ≥ 10 mm Hg; the threshold for complications of portal hypertension); however, only a minority of them have been evaluated in compensated advanced chronic liver disease (i.e., the target population). Importantly, most methods correlate only weakly with HVPG at high values (i.e., in patients with CSPH). Nevertheless, selected methods show promise for diagnosing HVPG ≥ 16 mm Hg (the cut-off for increased risks of hepatic decompensation and mortality) and monitoring HVPG changes in response to nonselective beta-blockers or etiological treatments. Finally, we review established and potential future clinical applications of noninvasive methods.

2D shear wave liver elastography by Aixplorer to detect portal hypertension in cirrhosis: An individual patient data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Liver stiffness measured with 2-dimensional shear wave elastography by Supersonic Imagine (2DSWE-SSI) is well-established for fibrosis diagnostics, but non-conclusive for portal hypertension.

METHODS

We performed an individual patient data meta-analysis of 2DSWE-SSI to identify clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH), severe portal hypertension and large varices in cirrhosis patients, using hepatic venous pressure gradient and upper endoscopy as reference. We used meta-analytical integration of diagnostic accuracies with optimized rule-out (sensitivity-90%) and rule-in (specificity-90%) cut-offs.

RESULTS

Five studies from seven centres shared data on 519 patients. After exclusion, we included 328 patients. Eighty-nine (27%) were compensated and 286 (87%) had CSPH. 2DSWE-SSI < 14 kPa ruled out CSPH with a summary AUROC (sROC), sensitivity and specificity of 0.88, 91% and 37%, and correctly classified 85% of patients, with minimal between-study heterogeneity. The false negative rate was 60%, of which decompensated patients accounted for 78%. 2DSWE-SSI ≥ 32 kPa ruled in CSPH with sROC, sensitivity, specificity and correct classifications of 0.83, 47%, 89% and 55%. In a subgroup analysis, the 14 kPa cut-off showed consistent sensitivity and higher specificity for patients with compensated cirrhosis, without ascites, viral aetiology or BMI < 25 kg/m² . 2DSWE-SSI ruled out severe portal hypertension and large varices with fewer correctly classified and lower sROC, and with minimal benefit for ruling in.

CONCLUSION

Liver stiffness using 2-dimensional shear wave elastography below 14 kPa may be used to rule out clinically significant portal hypertension in cirrhosis patients, but this would need validation in populations of compensated liver disease. 2DSWE-SSI cannot predict varices needing treatment.

Portal pressure monitoring-state-of-the-art and future perspective

Portal hypertension is a serious symptom of chronic liver diseases, which can lead to many critical complications, such as the formation of varices related to upper digestive bleeding, ascites, infection, hepatic encephalopathy, renal failure, and even death. As a result, portal pressure monitoring has important prognostic and clinical implications. The hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement, a gold-standard method applied to monitor portal pressure, is invasive and only available in experienced centers. Over the past decade, noninvasive methods aimed at monitoring the portal pressure have been increasingly investigated, including serum markers, radiological features, ultrasound elastography, doppler and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. In this study, we focused on both invasive and noninvasive methods for portal pressure monitoring and explored their roles in clinical setting. The advantages and limitations of various techniques for future research are also discussed.

Spleen stiffness by 2-D shear wave elastography is the most accurate predictor of high-risk esophagogastric varices in children with biliary atresia

AIM

Esophagogastric variceal hemorrhage is a cause of poor prognosis in patients with biliary atresia (BA). To prevent variceal hemorrhage, simple and reliable screening methods for high-risk esophagogastric varices (HR-EGV) are needed. We evaluated the efficacy of liver stiffness (LS) and spleen stiffness (SS) as measured by 2-D shear wave elastography (2D-SWE), which was reported to be more accurate than transient elastography, for detecting HR-EGV in children with BA.

METHODS

Thirty-four children with BA were enrolled. Both LS and SS were measured by 2D-SWE. The presence of large esophageal varices or esophageal varices of any size with red wale marking and/or the presence of gastric varices along the cardia were defined as HR-EGV. Clinical data were collected and previously reported prediction indices for varices were calculated.

RESULTS

Liver stiffness and SS were obtained from all patients. Fourteen patients showed HR-EGV. Significantly different variables between patients with and without HR-EGV were as follows: spleen diameter (116 mm vs. 95 mm), clinical prediction rule (104.7 vs. 124.7), King's variceal prediction score (78.8 vs. 99.4), aspartic aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (2.03 vs. 0.98), LS (2.63 m/s vs. 1.87 m/s), and SS (4.44 m/s vs. 3.69 m/s). The highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for detecting HR-EGV was that for SS (0.900), and the cut-off SS of 4.12 m/s yielded 92.9% sensitivity and 90% specificity. The intraclass correlation coefficient for intra-observer reproducibility was 0.828.

CONCLUSIONS

Spleen stiffness from 2D-SWE offered the most accurate predictor of HR-EGV in BA children.

A novel model for predicting posthepatectomy liver failure in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is the most leading cause of mortality following hepatectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Platelet count was reported to be a simple but useful indicator of liver cirrhosis and function of spleen. Spleen stiffness (SS) was used to evaluate the morphological change of spleen and was reported to be related to liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. However, the predictive value of platelet to spleen stiffness ratio (PSR) on PHLF remains unknown. A retrospective study was performed to analyze 158 patients with HCC following hepatectomy from August 2015 to February 2016. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the value of each risk factor for predicting PHLF. The predictive efficiency of the risk factors was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. PHLF occured in 23 (14.6%) patients. PSR (P<0.001, odds ratio (OR) = 0.622, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.493~0.784), hepatic inflow occlusion (HIO) (P = 0.003, OR = 1.044, 95% CI 1.015~1.075) and major hepatectomy (P = 0.019, OR = 5.967, 95% CI 1.346~26.443) were demonstrated to be the independent predictive factors for development of PHLF in a multivariate analysis. Results of the present study suggested PSR is a novel and non-invasive model for predicting PHLF in patients with HCC.