SATB2 protein expression by immunohistochemistry is a sensitive and specific marker of appendiceal and rectosigmoid well differentiated neuroendocrine tumours

Expression rate and comparison of immunohistochemistry biomarkers in appendiceal neuroendocrine and other epithelial cell neoplasms: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) provides comprehensive information for morphology and pathologic characteristics and is a valuable tool for establishing the correct cancer diagnosis in clinical diagnostic pathology and determining prognosis. Objectives: The current study analyzes and compares the expression of Immunohistochemistry biomarkers on neuroendocrine and epithelial cell types of appendiceal neoplasms. Design: This systematic review adhered to the recommendations in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. We performed a meta-analysis employing a random effects model with proportions to gauge the proportion of positive cases. Method: A comprehensive systematic search in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases was conducted based on the PRISMA statement up to August 2023. Studies reporting the immunohistochemistry biomarkers expression performed in patients with primary appendiceal neuroendocrine and epithelial cell neoplasms according to the most recent World Health Organization classification of malignant tumors were included. Results: Our systematic search included 56 observational articles that meet the eligibility criteria. Meta-analysis revealed an expression rate of 93%, 91%, 87%, 71%, 94%, 99%, 32%, 76%, 25%, and 91% for non-specific enolase (NSE), chromaffin A, synaptophysin, Serotonin, SATB2, Caudal-type homeobox 2 (CDX2), β-catenin, Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), Cytokeratin 7, and Cytokeratin 20, respectively. CDX2 and SATB2 were the most expressed markers. The expression rate had a significant association with tumor type. NSE and synaptophysin were the highest in neuroendocrine tumors, whereas CEA was more elevated in gablet cell carcinoids. Cytokeratin 20 is suitable for identifying epithelial cell neoplasms. Conclusion: The study indicates the proportion of positive cases in patients with primary neuroendocrine and epithelial cell appendiceal neoplasms.

[Neuroendocrine tumors]

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a diverse group of neoplasms that originate from neuroendocrine cells throughout the body. Diagnosing NETs presents unique challenges due to their varied presentation, morphology, and biological behavior. This article provides an overview of the key diagnostic principles relevant to general pathologists, emphasizing the importance of a multidisciplinary approach that integrates clinical, radiological, histopathological, and immunohistochemical data. The emergence of new markers as well as recent advances in molecular pathology and the application of grading systems are discussed, highlighting their impact on prognosis and therapeutic strategies.

Practical hints for the diagnosis of mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms of the digestive system

In this editorial, a comment on the article by Díaz-López et al published in the recent issue of the 2024 is provided. We focus on the practical implications critical for providing a correct and complete diagnosis of mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN) in the gastrointestinal system. The diagnosis of MiNEN begins with the recognition of neuroendocrine features in one component of a biphasic tumor. The non-neuroendocrine counterpart can be virtually represented by any neoplastic type, even though the most frequent histologies are glandular and squamous. However, qualification of the neuroendocrine component requires histological and immunohistochemical confirmation. Neuroendocrine tumors are characterized by a peculiar architectural organization and bland nuclei with granular "salt and pepper" chromatin. Although neuroendocrine carcinomas have multiple and variable presentations, they typically show a solid or organoid architecture. The histological aspect needs to be confirmed by immunohistochemistry, and a diagnosis is confirmed whenever the expression of keratin and neuroendocrine markers is observed. Once both histopathological and immunohistochemical features of neuroendocrine neoplasms are identified, it is important to consider the three major pitfalls of MiNEN diagnostics: (1) Entrapment of neuroendocrine non-neoplastic cells within the tumor mass; (2) Differential diagnosis with amphicrine neoplasms; and (3) Differential diagnosis of tumors that partially express neuroendocrine markers. According to the current guidelines for diagnosing digestive MiNEN, each component must represent at least 30% of the entire neoplastic mass. Although the high-grade histopathological subtype frequently determines disease prognosis, both components can significantly affect prognosis. Thus, if one of the components, either neuroendocrine or non-neuroendocrine, does not fulfill the volumetric criteria, the guidelines still encourage reporting it. These strict criteria are essential for correctly recognizing and characterizing digestive MiNENs. This task is essential because it has prognostic relevance and substantial potential value for guiding further studies in this field. In the future, systematic analyses should be performed to validate or reconsider the current 30% cutoff value.

Oncogenic Role of SATB2 In Vitro: Regulator of Pluripotency, Self-Renewal, and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Prostate Cancer

Special AT-rich sequence binding protein-2 (SATB2) is a nuclear matrix protein that binds to nuclear attachment regions and is involved in chromatin remodeling and transcription regulation. In stem cells, it regulates the expression of genes required for maintaining pluripotency and self-renewal and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). In this study, we examined the oncogenic role of SATB2 in prostate cancer and assessed whether overexpression of SATB2 in human normal prostate epithelial cells (PrECs) induces properties of cancer stem cells (CSCs). The results demonstrate that SATB2 is highly expressed in prostate cancer cell lines and CSCs, but not in PrECs. Overexpression of SATB2 in PrECs induces cellular transformation which was evident by the formation of colonies in soft agar and spheroids in suspension. Overexpression of SATB2 in PrECs also resulted in induction of stem cell markers (CD44 and CD133), pluripotency-maintaining transcription factors (cMYC, OCT4, SOX2, KLF4, and NANOG), CADHERIN switch, and EMT-related transcription factors. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay demonstrated that SATB2 can directly bind to promoters of BCL-2, BSP, NANOG, MYC, XIAP, KLF4, and HOXA2, suggesting SATB2 is capable of directly regulating pluripotency/self-renewal, cell survival, and proliferation. Since prostate CSCs play a crucial role in cancer initiation, progression, and metastasis, we also examined the effects of SATB2 knockdown on stemness. SATB2 knockdown in prostate CSCs inhibited spheroid formation, cell viability, colony formation, cell motility, migration, and invasion compared to their scrambled control groups. SATB2 knockdown in CSCs also upregulated the expression of E-CADHERIN and inhibited the expression of N-CADHERIN, SNAIL, SLUG, and ZEB1. The expression of SATB2 was significantly higher in prostate adenocarcinoma compared to normal tissues. Overall, our data suggest that SATB2 acts as an oncogenic factor where it is capable of inducing malignant changes in PrECs by inducing CSC characteristics.

SATB2, CKAE1/AE3, and synaptophysin as a sensitive immunohistochemical panel for the detection of lymph node metastases of Merkel cell carcinoma

Histopathological evaluation of lymph nodes in Merkel cell carcinoma has become crucial in progression estimation and treatment modification. This study was undertaken to determine the most sensitive immunohistochemical panel for detecting MCC nodal metastases. We included 56 patients with 102 metastatic MCC lymph nodes, which were tested with seven antibodies: cytokeratin (CKAE1/AE3), CK20, chromogranin A, synaptophysin, INSM1, SATB2, and neurofilament (NF). Tissue microarrays (TMA) composed of 2-mm tissue cores from each nodal metastasis were constructed. A semiquantitative 5-tier scoring system (0%, < 25%, 25-74%, 75-99%, 100% positive MCC cells with moderate to strong reactivity) was implemented. In the statistical assessment, we included Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) status and expression heterogeneity between lymph nodes from one patient. A cumulative percentage of moderate to strong expression ≥ 75% of tumoral cells was observed for single cell markers as follows: 91/102 (89.2%) SATB2, 85/102 (83%) CKAE1/AE3, 80/102 (78.4%) synaptophysin, 75/102 (75.5%) INSM1, 68/102 (66.7%) chromogranin A, 60/102 cases (58.8%) CK20, and 0/102 (0%) NF. Three markers presented a complete lack of immunoreactivity: 8/102 (7.8%) CK20, 7/102 (6.9%) chromogranin A, and 6/102 (5.9%) NF. All markers showed expression heterogeneity in lymph nodes from one patient; however, the most homogenous was INSM1. The probability of detecting nodal MCC metastases was the highest while using SATB2 as a first-line marker (89.2%) with subsequential adding CKAE1/AE3 (99%); these results were independent of MCPyV status. Synaptophysin showed a superior significance in confirming the neuroendocrine origin of metastatic cells. This comprehensive analysis allows us to recommend simultaneous evaluation of SATB2, CKAE1/AE3, and synaptophysin in the routine pathologic MCC lymph node protocol.

microRNA-660 Enhances Cisplatin Sensitivity via Decreasing SATB2 Expression in Lung Adenocarcinoma

Increasing evidence suggests that microRNAs' (miRNAs) abnormal expression is one of the main factors of chemotherapy resistance in various cancers. However, the role of miRNAs in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) resistance to cisplatin is still unclear. In this study, we analyzed a microarray dataset to investigate miRNAs related to cisplatin resistance in LUAD. The expression of miRNAs in LUAD tissues and cell lines was detected using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Special AT-Rich Sequence-Binding Protein 2 (SATB2) in LUAD cell lines was detected using RT-qPCR and Western blot. Cell proliferation was measured by CCK8 and colony formation assays, while cell cycle and apoptosis were measured by flow cytometry. A dual-luciferase reporter assay was performed to confirm that SATB2 is a target gene of microRNA-660 (miR-660). We showed that the expression of miR-660 was not only decreased in LUAD cells and tissues but also further decreased in the cisplatin-resistant A549 cell line. The overexpression of miR-660 increased cisplatin sensitivity in LUAD cells. In addition, we identified SATB2 as a direct target gene of miR-660. We also revealed that miR-660 increased cisplatin sensitivity in LUAD cells via targeting SATB2. In conclusion, miR-660/SATB2 axis is a key regulator of cisplatin resistance in LUAD.

Cauda Equina Neuroendocrine Tumors: Distinct Epithelial Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of Spinal Origin

The tumor formerly known as "cauda equina paraganglioma" was recently renamed as cauda equina neuroendocrine tumor (CENET) based on distinct biological and genetic properties. Nevertheless, it remains insufficiently understood. For this study, we retrieved CENETs (some previously reported), from the pathology files of 3 institutions; we examined their immunohistochemical profile, including common neuroendocrine tumor-associated hormones and transcription factors. We identified 24 CENETs from 7 female and 17 male adult patients, with a median age of 47 years. Six included neurofilament-positive ganglion cells. All tumors tested were positive for INSM1, synaptophysin, chromogranin A, SSTR2, and CD56 as well as at least 1 keratin (AE1/AE3, CAM5.2); CK7 and CK20 were negative. Glial fibrillary acidic protein was negative, except for peripheral nontumoral elements. S100 protein was variable but mainly expressed in scattered sustentacular cells. All but 1 tumor tested were positive for HOXB13; several stained for SATB2, and all tumors were consistently negative for GATA3. All tumors tested were negative for transcription factors found in various other epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasms including TTF1, CDX2, PIT1, TPIT, SF1, and PAX8; staining for T-brachyury was negative. Four of 5 CENETs tested had at least focal tyrosine hydroxylase reactivity. Serotonin expression was detected in all 21 tumors tested; it was diffusely positive in 5 and had variable positivity in the remainder. A few tumors had scattered cells expressing gastrin, calcitonin, pancreatic polypeptide, and peptide YY, while glucagon, adrenocorticotropic hormone, and monoclonal carcinoembryonic antigen were negative. PSAP expression was found focally in 4 of 5 tumors examined. SDHB was consistently intact; ATRX was intact in 14 tumors and showed only focal loss in 3. The median Ki-67 labeling index was 4.5% (range: 1% to 15%). We conclude that CENET represents a distinct neuroendocrine neoplasm; the subset with ganglion cells qualifies for designation as composite gangliocytoma/neuroma-neuroendocrine tumor (CoGNET) as defined in the 2022 WHO classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms. In addition to INSM1, chromogranin, synaptophysin, and keratins, the most characteristic finding is nuclear HOXB13 expression; a subset also express SATB2. Serotonin is the most common hormone expressed. The cytogenesis and pathogenesis of these lesions remains unclear.

Transcription Factor Expression in Sinonasal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms and Olfactory Neuroblastoma (ONB): Hyams' Grades 1-3 ONBs Expand the Spectrum of SATB2 and GATA3-Positive Neoplasms

Sinonasal neuroendocrine neoplasms (SN-NENs) are rare and mostly include neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), whereas neuroendocrine tumor (NET) is exceptional in this site. Olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) is a malignant neuroectodermal neoplasm arising in the nasal cavity. Albeit crucial for correct patients' management, the distinction of high grade ONB from NEC is challenging and requires additional diagnostic markers. The transcription factor SATB2 has been recently introduced in routine diagnostics as an immunohistochemical marker of distal intestine differentiation. No specific data are available about SATB2 and GATA3 expression in SN-NENs. GATA3, SATB2, and, for comparison, CDX2 expression were investigated in a series of epithelial and non-epithelial SN-NENs. We collected 26 cases of ONB and 7 cases of epithelial SN-NENs diagnosed and treated in our Institution. ONBs were graded according to Hyams' system and epithelial NENs were reclassified into 5 NECs, 1 MiNEN, and 1 amphicrine carcinoma. Immunohistochemistry was performed using standard automated protocols. Hyams' grades 1-3 ONBs stained diffusely and intensely for SATB2, whereas grade 4 ONBs and NECs were globally negative. The non-neuroendocrine component of MiNEN and the amphicrine carcinoma were strongly positive. GATA3 was heterogeneously and unpredictably expressed in Hyams' grades 1-3 ONBs, whereas grade 4 ONBs and NECs were completely negative. CDX2 was negative in all cases. Our study identifies, for the first time, SATB2 and GATA3 expression as features of Hyams' grades 1-3 ONBs, expands the spectrum of SATB2 and GATA3-positive neoplasms, and suggests that Hyams' grade 4 ONBs are not only clinically but also biologically different from low graded ONBs.

SATB2 Expression in Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcomas of Bone

OBJECTIVES

SATB2 is a transcriptional regulator that plays an important role in osteoblastic differentiation. We examined the prevalence and potential significance of SATB2 expression in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) of bone.

METHODS

We examined 38 cases of bone UPS without osteoid. The male-to-female ratio was 1:1.4, with a median age of 48 years (range, 23-83 years). Tumors occurred primarily in the femur (n = 8) and ilium (n = 8), with a median tumor size of 9.5 cm (range, 1.8-27.0 cm). The median follow-up was 24.7 months (range, 2-82 months): 11 patients developed local recurrences, and 18 patients had metastases, mainly to lung and bone.

RESULTS

SATB2 expression (nuclear labeling ≥5%) was seen in 21 of 38 (55%) cases: 5 with focal (nuclear labeling 5%), 11 with patchy (nuclear labeling 5%-50%), and 5 with diffuse (nuclear labeling ≥50%) staining. Among this group, diffuse SATB2 expression demonstrated superior metastasis-free survival (P = .036) and event-free survival (P = .024). For comparison, 100 soft tissue UPS were stained; the majority were negative (75/100 [75%]).

CONCLUSIONS

UPS of bone demonstrated more frequent SATB2 expression compared with its soft tissue counterpart. In this series, diffuse SATB2 expression in UPS of bone was associated with better outcomes. Additional studies are still needed to determine its significance.

Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

In this review, we detail the changes and the relevant features that are applied to neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) in the 2022 WHO Classification of Endocrine and Neuroendocrine Tumors. Using a question-and-answer approach, we discuss the consolidation of the nomenclature that distinguishes neuronal paragangliomas from epithelial neoplasms, which are divided into well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). The criteria for these distinctions based on differentiation are outlined. NETs are generally (but not always) graded as G1, G2, and G3 based on proliferation, whereas NECs are by definition high grade; the importance of Ki67 as a tool for classification and grading is emphasized. The clinical relevance of proper classification is explained, and the importance of hormonal function is examined, including eutopic and ectopic hormone production. The tools available to pathologists for accurate classification include the conventional biomarkers of neuroendocrine lineage and differentiation, INSM1, synaptophysin, chromogranins, and somatostatin receptors (SSTRs), but also include transcription factors that can identify the site of origin of a metastatic lesion of unknown primary site, as well as hormones, enzymes, and keratins that play a role in functional and structural correlation. The recognition of highly proliferative, well-differentiated NETs has resulted in the need for biomarkers that can distinguish these G3 NETs from NECs, including stains to determine expression of SSTRs and those that can indicate the unique molecular pathogenetic alterations that underlie the distinction, for example, global loss of RB and aberrant p53 in pancreatic NECs compared with loss of ATRX, DAXX, and menin in pancreatic NETs. Other differential diagnoses are discussed with recommendations for biomarkers that can assist in correct classification, including the distinctions between epithelial and non-epithelial NENs that have allowed reclassification of epithelial NETs in the spine, in the duodenum, and in the middle ear; the first two may be composite tumors with neuronal and glial elements, and as this feature is integral to the duodenal lesion, it is now classified as composite gangliocytoma/neuroma and neuroendocrine tumor (CoGNET). The many other aspects of differential diagnosis are detailed with recommendations for biomarkers that can distinguish NENs from non-neuroendocrine lesions that can mimic their morphology. The concepts of mixed neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine (MiNEN) and amphicrine tumors are clarified with information about how to approach such lesions in routine practice. Theranostic biomarkers that assist patient management are reviewed. Given the significant proportion of NENs that are associated with germline mutations that predispose to this disease, we explain the role of the pathologist in identifying precursor lesions and applying molecular immunohistochemistry to guide genetic testing.

Ductal breast carcinoma metastasized to the rectum: A case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal (GI) metastasis from breast cancer (BC) is rarely encountered in clinical practice. Nonspecific symptoms and long intervals make early diagnosis difficult. Therefore, increased awareness of GI metastasis secondary to BC and a deep understanding of the clinical and pathological features, and intervention for GI metastasis are fundamental to avoid delay in correct diagnosis and management.

CASE SUMMARY

The present report discusses the case of a Chinese female patient aged 36 years. The patient presented with difficult defecation along with bloody stools and hypogastralgia. In 2015, she had undergone right modified radical mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection in another hospital to treat the infiltrating ductal breast carcinoma pT1N1M0. The presenting symptoms were investigated by colonoscopy, which indicated a circumferential stricture in the lower rectum at 3 cm from the anal edge. Further investigation with positron emission tomography-computed tomography revealed an uptake of fluorodeoxyglucose within the distal rectum as well as in the left acetabulum. The samples from laparoscopic exploration were biopsied, which revealed metastases of BC. Immunohistochemical analysis of the tumor confirmed that the patient had rectal metastasis of infiltrating ductal BC.

CONCLUSION

Rectal metastasis should be considered when patients with a history of BC present with changed bowel habits.

Expression of nSATB2 in Neuroendocrine Carcinomas of the Lung: Frequent Immunopositivity of Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma with a Diagnostic Pitfall

Small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) and pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) are both classified as lung neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). It has recently been reported that the special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2 (STAB2), known as a colorectal cancer marker, is also expressed in NECs occurring in various organs including the lung. However, few studies have examined any differences of SATB2 immunopositivity between SCLC and LCNEC. We investigated SATB2 expression in 45 SCLC and 14 LCNEC cases using immunohistochemistry as well as the expression of caudal-type homeobox 2 (CDX2) and keratin (KRT) 20. The LCNEC cases were more frequently positive for SATB2 (ten out of 14, 71%) than the SCLC ones (seventeen out of 45, 38%) with a statistically significance (P = 0.035). Furthermore, two LCNEC cases were positive for CDX2 while no positive findings were observed for any SCLC cases, the difference of which, however, was not statistically significant (P = 0.053). KRT20 was negative in all LCNEC and SCLC cases. These results require our attention when we use SATB2 and CDX2 as colorectal cancer markers because their expression in pulmonary NECs can lead to a misdiagnosis that the tumor is of metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, especially when the patient has a past history of colorectal cancer. Analyzing the relationship between the demographic/clinical variables and the SATB2 expression in the SCLC cases, just high Brinkman index (≥ 600) was significantly related to the positivity of SATB2 (P = 0.017), which is interesting considering the strong relationship between SCLC and smoking.

Middle Ear "Adenoma": a Neuroendocrine Tumor with Predominant L Cell Differentiation

This morphological and immunohistochemical study demonstrates that tumors currently known as "middle ear adenomas" are truly well-differentiated epithelial neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) composed of cells comparable to normal intestinal L cells, and therefore, these tumors resemble hindgut NETs. These tumors show consistent expression of glucagon, pancreatic polypeptide, PYY, and the transcription factor SATB2, as well as generic neuroendocrine markers and keratins. The same L cell markers are expressed by cells within the normal middle ear epithelium. These markers define a valuable immunohistochemical profile that can be used for differential diagnosis of middle ear neoplasms, particularly in distinguishing epithelial NETs from paragangliomas. The discovery of neuroendocrine cells expressing the same markers in non-neoplastic middle ear mucosa opens new areas of investigation into the physiology of the normal middle ear and the pathophysiology of middle ear disorders.

SATB2 Is Expressed in a Subset of Pulmonary and Thymic Neuroendocrine Tumors

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate SATB2 expression and prognostic implications in a large cohort of thoracic neuroendocrine tumors.

METHODS

Surgical pathology files (1995-2017) and an institutional thymic epithelial tumor database (2010-2020) were searched for resected neuroendocrine tumors. Cases were stained with SATB2 (clone EP281). Percent SATB2-positive tumor cells and expression intensity were scored.

RESULTS

In the lung, SATB2 was expressed in 5% or more of tumor cells in 29 (74.4%) of 39 small cell carcinomas and 9 (22.5%) of 40 atypical and 26 (40.6%) of 64 typical carcinoid tumors. SATB2 percent tumor cell expression and intensity were higher in small cell carcinomas than in carcinoid tumors (both P < .001, respectively). After adjusting for tumor subtype, SATB2 expression did not correlate with outcome. In the thymus, four (100%) of four atypical carcinoid tumors and one large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma but no small cell carcinoma (n = 2) expressed SATB2 in 5% or more of tumor cells.

CONCLUSIONS

SATB2 (clone EP281) is expressed in a large subset of pulmonary and thymic neuroendocrine tumors and therefore does not appear to be a useful marker to identify the origin of neuroendocrine tumors. Validation studies are needed, specifically including thymic neuroendocrine tumors, as the expression pattern might be different in those tumors.

SATB2 is a novel biomarker and therapeutic target for cancer

Several studies have confirmed the involvement of cancer stem cells (CSC) in tumour progression, metastasis, drug resistance and cancer relapse. SATB2 (special AT-rich binding protein-2) acts as a transcriptional co-factor and modulates chromatin architecture to regulate gene expression. The purpose of this review was to discuss the pathophysiological roles of SATB2 and assess whether it could be used as a therapeutic target for cancer. SATB2 modulated the expression of those genes which regulated pluripotency and self-renewal. Overexpression of SATB2 gene in normal epithelial cells was shown to induce transformation, as a result transformed cells gained CSC's characteristics by expressing stem cell markers and pluripotency maintaining factors, suggesting its role as an oncogene. In addition, SATB2 induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and metastasis. Interestingly, the expression of SATB2 was positively correlated with the activation of β-catenin/TCF-LEF pathway. Furthermore, SATB2 silencing inhibited EMT and their positive regulators, and tumour growth, and suppressed the expression of stem cell markers, pluripotency maintaining factors, cell cycle and cell survival genes, and TCF/LEF targets. Based on the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) expression data and published papers, SATB2 alone or in combination with other proteins could be used a diagnostic biomarker for cancer. Although there is no pharmacological inhibitor of SATB2, studies using genetic approaches suggest that SATB2 could be a potential target for cancer treatment and prevention.

Hepatocellular carcinomas can be Special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2 positive: an important diagnostic pitfall

Special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2 (SATB2) is a sensitive and specific marker for tumors originating with the colon and appendix. It is now commonly used in surgical pathology, while working up carcinomas of unknown primary. We had anecdotally encountered occasional hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) that were SATB2 positive. Immunohistochemical expression of SATB2 in HCC has not yet been examined in detail. In this study, we evaluated SATB2 expression in 46 HCCs. Nineteen (41%) of 46 HCCs were positive for SATB2. SATB2 expression in HCCs was more commonly seen in poorly differentiated tumors (11 of 13 cases, 85%) than well and moderately differentiated tumors (8 of 33 cases, 24%), p value = 0.0001. No other statistically significant correlations were observed (p > 0.05). There were no other statistically significant correlations between SATB2 expression and age, gender, background liver disease, and cirrhosis (p > 0.05). Results of our study show that a significant subset (41%) of HCCs can be SATB2 positive. Awareness of this phenomenon is important as SATB2 expression in a liver tumor does not completely exclude a diagnosis of HCC.

Positivity for SATB2 distinguishes Islet1 positive rectal neuroendocrine tumours from pancreaticoduodenal neuroendocrine tumours

AIMS

Determining the site of origin of a metastatic neuroendocrine tumour (NET) can be challenging and has important prognostic and therapeutic implications. An immunohistochemical (IHC) panel consisting of TTF1, CDX2, PAX8/PAX6 and Islet1 is often employed. However, there can be a significant IHC overlap among different primary sites. Herein, we sought to determine the utility of including Special AT-rich sequence binding protein-2 (SATB2) in the IHC panel that is used for determining the site of origin of a metastatic NET.

METHODS

Paraffin tissue microarrays consisting of 137 primary NETs (26 lung, 22 jejunoileal, 8 appendix, 5 stomach, 4 duodenum, 17 rectum and 55 pancreas) were stained for SATB2, in addition to the well-described lineage-associated markers, such as TTF1, CDX2, PAX6 and Islet1. Additionally, a tissue microarray consisting of 21 metastatic NETs (1 lung, 1 stomach, 8 jejunoileal and 11 pancreas) was stained for TTF1, CDX2, SATB2 and Islet1. The results were recorded as no staining, weak staining and moderate to strong staining.

RESULTS

All appendiceal NETs and majority (88%) of the rectal NETs were positive for SATB2. All primary foregut NETs (stomach, pancreas, duodenum and lung) were negative for SATB2, except for one pulmonary NET with weak staining. However, among the metastatic tumours, 5 of 11 pancreatic NETs, 1 stomach NET, 1 lung NET and 2 of 8 jejunoileal NETs showed weak staining. Receiver operating characteristic analysis incorporating sensitivity and specificity data of IHC panel, considering moderate to strong staining as truly positive cases, showed that inclusion of SATB2 to the previously described NET IHC panel outperformed the panel without SATB2, raising the specificity for pancreaticoduodenal NETs from 81.2% to 100%, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 100% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 82.22% (p<0.0001); for appendiceal NETs the specificity changed from 99.1% to 98.5% and sensitivity increased from 11.8% to 80%, with a PPV and NPV of 66.67% and 99.26%, respectively (p<0.0001); and for rectal NETs the specificity increased from 97.6% to 99.3% and sensitivity raised from 7.1% to 66.7%, with a PPV and NPV of 80% and 98.53%, respectively (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

SATB2 stain is useful in differentiatingIslet1/PAX6 positive pancreatic and rectal NETs, as rectal NETs are typically moderately to strongly positive for SATB2 and pancreatic NETs are usually negative or weakly positive for SATB2. Moderate to strong staining for SATB2 is suggestive of an appendiceal or a rectal primary. SATB2 may complement the panel of CDX2, TTF1 and Islet1 in determining the site of origin of an NET in a metastatic setting.