Histopathological study of six types of adverse cutaneous drug reactions using granulysin expression

Update on Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: Diagnosis and Management

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are the most severe cutaneous adverse reactions that are typically drug-induced in adults. Both SJS and TEN have high morbidity and mortality rates. SJS/TEN imposes clinical challenges for physicians managing patients suffering from this condition, both because it is rare and because it is a rapidly progressing systemic disease with severe cutaneous, mucosal, and systemic manifestations. Although many cases of SJS/TEN have been reported in the literature, there is no consensus regarding diagnostic criteria or treatment. Significant progress has been made in understanding its genetic predisposition and pathogenesis. This review is intended to provide physicians with a comprehensive but practical SJS/TEN roadmap to guide diagnosis and management. We review data on pathogenesis, reported precipitating factors, presentation, diagnosis, and management SJS/TEN focusing on what is new over the last 5 years.

A systematic review of case-control studies of cytokines in blister fluid and skin tissue of patients with Stevens Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis

Stevens Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are severe cutaneous adverse reactions characterised by keratinocyte apoptosis, necroptosis and epidermal detachment. Several cytokines and cytotoxic proteins have been shown to be elevated in the blood and skin of SJS/TEN sufferers and biologics such as intravenous immune globulin and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha inhibitors have demonstrated good therapeutic potential. The exact pathogenic model of SJS/TEN however remains elusive. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the case-control studies of cytokines and cytotoxic proteins in the blister fluid and skin of adults with Stevens Johnson syndrome and/or toxic epidermal necrolysis. This review was registered with INPLASY and conducted in accordance with the PRISMA reporting guidelines. Potential bias was assessed using the NIH criteria. Eleven articles describing results from 96 cases and 170 controls were included. Fas, Fas ligand, Interleukin (IL)-8 and B-cell lymphoma (Bcl)-2 were elevated in SJS/TEN blister fluid and skin tissue, compared with healthy controls. IL-2, IL-6, TNF-alpha, tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), interferon-gamma and matrix metalloproteinase-2 were elevated in SJS/TEN blister fluid compared with fluid sampled from lesional controls. Granulysin, IL-33, TGF-beta-1 and IL-13 were elevated in SJS/TEN skin tissue compared with lesional lichen planus tissue, as was IL-13, IFN-gamma, IL-2 and IL-5, when compared with erythema multiforme tissue. A wide array of cytokines and cytotoxic proteins are present at higher concentrations in the blister fluid and skin tissue of SJS/TEN patients compared with healthy and lesional controls. Our findings suggest that these proteins may be pathogenic, as well as possibly markers for diagnosis, disease severity and course. They may also prove to be useful therapeutic targets. More research is needed.

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. Part II diagnosis and management

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome, also known as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, is a severe cutaneous adverse reaction characterized by an exanthem, fever, and hematologic and visceral organ involvement. The differential diagnosis includes other cutaneous adverse reactions, infections, inflammatory and autoimmune diseases, and neoplastic disorders. Three sets of diagnostic criteria have been proposed; however, consensus is lacking. The cornerstone of management is immediate discontinuation of the suspected drug culprit. Systemic corticosteroids remain first-line therapy, but the literature on steroid-sparing agents is expanding. Longitudinal evaluation for sequelae is recommended. Adjunctive tests for risk stratification and drug culprit identification remain under investigation. Part II of this continuing medical education activity begins by exploring the differential diagnosis and diagnosis of drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms and concludes with an evidence-based overview of evaluation and treatment.

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. Part I. Epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinicopathological features, and prognosis

Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DiHS), also known as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), is a severe cutaneous adverse reaction (SCAR) characterized by an exanthem, fever, and hematologic and visceral organ involvement. Anticonvulsants, antibiotics, and allopurinol are the most common triggers. The pathogenesis involves a complex interplay between drugs, viruses, and the immune system primarily mediated by T-cells. DiHS/DRESS typically presents with a morbilliform eruption 2-6 weeks after drug exposure, and is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and risk of relapse. Long-term sequelae primarily relate to organ dysfunction and autoimmune diseases. Part I of this continuing medical education activity on DiHS/DRESS provides an update on epidemiology, novel insights into pathogenesis, and a description of clinicopathological features and prognosis.

Advances in understanding of the pathogenesis and therapeutic implications of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms: an updated review

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms or drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DRESS/DIHS) is one type of severe cutaneous adverse reaction (SCAR). It is featured by fever, widespread skin lesions, protracted clinical course, internal organ involvement, and possibly long-term autoimmune sequelae. The presence of high-risk human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles, hypersensitivity reaction after culprit drug ingestion, and human herpesvirus reactivation may all contribute to its complex clinical manifestations. Some recent studies focusing on the roles of involved cytokines/chemokines and T cells co-signaling pathways in DRESS/DIHS were conducted. In addition, some predictors of disease severity and prognosis were also reported. In this review, we provided an update on the current understanding of the pathogenesis, potential biomarkers, and the relevant therapeutic rationales of DRESS/DIHS.

Current understanding of genetic associations with delayed hypersensitivity reactions induced by antibiotics and anti-osteoporotic drugs

Drug-induced delayed hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) is still a clinical and healthcare burden in every country. Increasing reports of DHRs have caught our attention to explore the genetic relationship, especially life-threatening severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions (SCARs), including acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP), drug reactions with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). In recent years, many studies have investigated the immune mechanism and genetic markers of DHRs. Besides, several studies have stated the associations between antibiotics-as well as anti-osteoporotic drugs (AOD)-induced SCARs and specific human leukocyte antigens (HLA) alleles. Strong associations between drugs and HLA alleles such as co-trimoxazole-induced DRESS and HLA-B*13:01 (Odds ratio (OR) = 45), dapsone-DRESS and HLA-B*13:01 (OR = 122.1), vancomycin-DRESS and HLA-A*32:01 (OR = 403), clindamycin-DHRs and HLA-B*15:27 (OR = 55.6), and strontium ranelate (SR)-SJS/TEN and HLA-A*33:03 (OR = 25.97) are listed. We summarized the immune mechanism of SCARs, update the latest knowledge of pharmacogenomics of antibiotics- and AOD-induced SCARs, and indicate the potential clinical use of these genetic markers for SCARs prevention in this mini review article.

Delayed Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions: Molecular Recognition, Genetic Susceptibility, and Immune Mediators

Drug hypersensitivity reactions are classified into immediate and delayed types, according to the onset time. In contrast to the immediate type, delayed drug hypersensitivity mainly involves T lymphocyte recognition of the drug antigens and cell activation. The clinical presentations of such hypersensitivity are various and range from mild reactions (e.g., maculopapular exanthema (MPE) and fixed drug eruption (FDE)), to drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) (e.g., Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP)). The common culprits of delayed drug hypersensitivity include anti-epileptics, antibiotics, anti-gout agents, anti-viral drugs, etc. Delayed drug hypersensitivity is proposed to be initiated by different models of molecular recognition, composed of drug/metabolite antigen and endogenous peptide, HLA presentation, and T cell receptor (TCR) interaction. Increasing the genetic variants of HLA loci and drug metabolic enzymes has been identified to be responsible for delayed drug hypersensitivity. Furthermore, preferential TCR clonotypes, and the activation of cytotoxic proteins/cytokines/chemokines, are also involved in the pathogenesis of delayed drug hypersensitivity. This review provides a summary of the current understanding of the molecular recognition, genetic susceptibility, and immune mediators of delayed drug hypersensitivity.

Associations of HLA-A and HLA-B with vancomycin-induced drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms in the Han-Chinese population

Vancomycin is a commonly used antibiotic; however, it can cause life-threatening severe cutaneous adverse reactions, such as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS). A previous study has reported a strong association between HLA-A*32:01 and vancomycin-induced DRESS in European ethnicity. Herein, we aim to investigate the genetic predisposition of vancomycin-induced DRESS in the Han-Chinese population. In this study, we enrolled a total of 26 patients with vancomycin-induced DRESS, 1,616 general population controls, and 51 subjects tolerant to vancomycin. In vitro granulysin-based lymphocyte activation tests (LAT) were conducted among 6 vancomycin-induced DRESS patients who were concomitantly receiving other medicines. HLA-A and HLA-B genotypes were determined by sequencing-based typing. Our results found that vancomycin-induced DRESS was associated with HLA-A*32:01 [odds ratio (OR) = 7.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.7-35.8; p-value = 0.035], HLA-B*07:05 (OR = 32.3, 95% CI = 2.8-367.7; p-value = 0.047), HLA-B*40:06 (OR = 4.7, 95% CI = 1.3-16.1; p-value = 0.036) and HLA-B*67:01 (OR = 44.8, 95% CI = 7.2-280.4; p-value = 0.002) when comparing the vancomycin-induced DRESS patients with the general population controls. LAT results showed that granulysin significantly increased in the vancomycin-induced DRESS patients upon vancomycin stimulation (4.7 ± 3.7 fold increased), but not upon other co-medicines. This study identified that, in addition to HLA-A*32:01, HLA-B*07:05, HLA-B*40:06, and HLA-B*67:01 were also genetic markers for vancomycin-induced DRESS in the Han-Chinese population. Associations of ethnic variances in HLA with vancomycin-DRESS were observed.

Advances in the Pathomechanisms of Delayed Drug Hypersensitivity

Delayed drug hypersensitivity continues to contribute to major clinical problems worldwide. The clinical presentations of delayed drug hypersensitivity are diverse, ranging from mild skin rashes to life-threatening systemic reactions. The pathomechanism of delayed drug hypersensitivity involves human leukocyte antigens (HLA) presentation of drugs/metabolites to T cell receptors (TCR), resulting in T-cell activation. The pathogenesis of delayed drug hypersensitivity also has reactivation of the virus, and activation of many immune mediators. In this review, we discuss the immune pathogenesis, molecular interactions of HLA/drugs/TCR, and downstream signaling of cytotoxic proteins/cytokines/chemokines, as well as disease prevention and management for delayed drug hypersensitivity.

Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DReSS)/Drug-Induced Hypersensitivity Syndrome (DiHS)-Readdressing the DReSS

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DReSS), also known as drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DiHS), is a severe, systemic, T cell mediated drug reaction with combinations of cutaneous, hematologic, and internal organ involvement. Pathogenesis of DReSS is multi-factorial, involving drug-exposure, genetic predisposition through specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles and metabolism defects, viral reactivation, and immune dysregulation. Clinical features of this condition are delayed, stepwise, and heterogenous, making this syndrome challenging to recognize and diagnose. Two sets of validated diagnostic criteria exist that can be employed to diagnose DReSS/DiHS. Methods to improve early recognition of DReSS and predict disease severity has been a recent area of research focus. In vitro and in vivo tests can be employed to confirm the diagnosis and help identify culprit drugs. The mainstay treatment of DReSS is prompt withdrawal of the culprit drug, supportive treatment, and immunosuppression depending on the severity of disease. We present a comprehensive review on the most recent research and literature on DReSS, with emphasis on pathogenesis, clinical features, diagnosis, confirmatory testing modalities, and treatment. Additionally, this summary aims to highlight the differing viewpoints on this severe disease and broaden our perspective on the condition known as DReSS.

Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis in the Era of Systems Medicine

Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN) are severe mucocutaneous bullous disorders characterized by widespread skin and mucosal necrosis and detachment, which are most commonly triggered by medications. Despite their rarity, these severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions will result in high mortality and morbidity as well as long-term sequela. The immunopathologic mechanisms is mainly cell-mediated cytotoxic reaction against keratinocytes leading to massive skin necrolysis. Subsequent studies have demonstrated that immune synapse composed of cytotoxic T cells with drug-specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I restriction and T cell receptors (TCR) repertoire is the key pathogenic for SJS/TEN. Various cytotoxic proteins and cytokines such as soluble granulysin, perforin, granzyme B, interleukin-15, Fas ligand, interferon-γ, tumor necrosis factor-α have been as mediators involved in the pathogenesis of SJS/TEN. Early recognition and immediate withdrawal of causative agents, and critical multidisciplinary supportive care are key management of SJS/TEN. To date, there is yet to be a sufficient consensus or recommendation for the immunomodulants of the treatment in SJS/TEN. Systemic corticosteroids remain one of the most common treatment options for SJS/TEN, though the efficacy remain uncertain. Currently, there is increasing evidence showing that cyclosporine and TNF-α inhibitors decrease the mortality of SJS/TEN. Further multicenter double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trials are required to confirm the efficacy and safety.

Histopathologic Features of Maculopapular Drug Eruption

Background: Cutaneous adverse drug reaction (CADR) is common in both inpatient and outpatient clinical settings and has been associated with a large variety of medications. Drug reactions represent a significant burden to the healthcare system due to increased hospital stay durations and associated costs. Moreover, some of these reactions may be life-threatening. The most common clinical manifestation of a CADR is a maculopapular drug eruption (MDE). Due to its many clinical mimics and associations with a variety of histopathologic patterns, maculopapular drug eruption is difficult to definitively diagnose from both a clinical and histopathological perspective. Summary: We reviewed the clinical and histopathologic features of 327 cases of MDE from several studies in the literature and summarized characteristic histopathologic findings and their frequencies of occurrence. We found that the most common and suggestive histopathologic features of MDE were epidermal spongiosis, lymphocytic infiltrate, and occasional necrotic keratinocytes; interface change at the DEJ; superficial perivascular and interstitial lymphocytic infiltrate with or without eosinophils and neutrophils in the mid-to-deep dermis and mild papillary dermal edema; and dilation of superficial vessels. The presence of multiple histopathologic patterns within the same tissue specimen is also suggestive of MDE. This review and analysis suggest that a biopsy may improve the diagnostic accuracy by both establishing common and uncommon features associated with MDE and reviewing features that help to exclude other causes of maculopapular eruption. Key Message: Histopathologic criteria for the diagnosis of MDE, while not entirely specific, may aid in establishing a differential that includes a drug eruption. Thus, a biopsy can be a helpful diagnostic tool when MDE is suspected by demonstrating findings suggestive of MDE or by ruling out clinical mimics. However, biopsy results cannot be used in isolation as clinical-pathologic correlation is paramount in MDE.

Apalutamide-associated skin rash in patients with prostate cancer: Histological evaluation by skin biopsy

INTRODUCTION

Apalutamide-associated skin rash is a more common adverse event in the Japanese population than in the global population. However, its mechanism remains elusive, and limited histopathological information hampers further understanding.

CASE PRESENTATION

Case 1: a 71-year-old man with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer developed a skin rash after 70 days of apalutamide treatment. Case 2: a 71-year-old man with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer developed a skin rash after 71 days of apalutamide treatment. In both cases, the skin rash presented as a slightly exudative erythema. The histology showed spongiosis of the epidermis and perivascular and interstitial infiltration of lymphocytes and eosinophils in the upper dermis without necrotic keratinocytes.

CONCLUSION

Apalutamide-induced skin rashes can involve an eczematous reaction clinically and histologically.

A Review of Fixed Drug Eruption with a Special Focus on Generalized Bullous Fixed Drug Eruption

Fixed drug eruption (FDE) is a cutaneous adverse drug reaction characterized by the onset of rash at a fixed location on the body each time a specific medication is ingested. With each recurrence, the eruption can involve additional sites. Lesions can have overlying vesicles and/or bullae, and when they cover a significant percentage of body surface area, the eruption is referred to as generalized bullous fixed drug eruption (GBFDE). Due to the widespread skin denudation that can be seen in this condition, GBFDE may be confused clinically with Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN). While treatments described for GBFDE include supportive care, topical and/or systemic steroids, and, recently, cyclosporine, the mainstay of management involves identifying and discontinuing the causative drug. This review article will provide an overview of FDE with an emphasis on its generalized bullous variant.

Skin eruptions in children: Drug hypersensitivity vs viral exanthema

Childhood rashes or exanthemas are common and are usually relatively benign. There are many causes of rash in children, including mainly viruses, and less often bacterial toxins, drugs, allergens and other diseases. Viral exanthema often appears while children are taking a medication in the course of a viral infection; it can mimic drug exanthema and is perceived as a drug allergy in 10% of cases. In the vast majority of cases, the distinction between virus-induced and drug-induced skin eruption during the acute phase is not possible. The drugs most commonly implicated are beta-lactams (BL) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Viruses, commonly Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), human herpesvirus 6 (HHV6) and cytomegalovirus (CMV), and the bacterium, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, may cause exanthema either from the infection itself (active or latent) or because of interaction with drugs that are taken simultaneously. Determination of the exact diagnosis requires a careful clinical history and thorough physical examination. Haematological and biochemical investigations and histology are not always helpful in differentiating between the two types of exanthema. Serological and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays can be helpful, although a concomitant acute infection does not exclude drug hypersensitivity. A drug provocation test (DPT) is although considered the gold standard for the diagnosis and is not preferred by the patients. Skin tests are not well tolerated, and in vitro tests, such as the basophil activation test and lymphocyte transformation, are of low sensitivity and specificity and their relevance is debatable. Based on current evidence, we propose a systematic clinical approach for timely differential diagnosis and management of rashes in children who present a cutaneous eruption while receiving a drug.

An Updated Review of the Diagnostic Methods in Delayed Drug Hypersensitivity

Delayed drug hypersensitivity reactions are clinically diverse reactions that vary from isolated benign skin conditions that remit quickly with no or symptomatic treatment, drug discontinuation or even continued drug treatment, to the other extreme of severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) that are associated with presumed life-long memory T-cell responses, significant acute and long-term morbidity and mortality. Diagnostic "in clinic" approaches to delayed hypersensitivity reactions have included patch testing (PT), delayed intradermal testing (IDT) and drug challenges for milder reactions. Patch and IDT are, in general, performed no sooner than 4-6 weeks after resolution of the acute reaction at the maximum non-irritating concentrations. Functional in vitro and ex vivo assays have largely remained the province of research laboratories and include lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) and cytokine release enzyme linked ImmunoSpot (ELISpot) assay, an emerging diagnostic tool which uses cytokine release, typically IFN-γ, after the patient's peripheral blood mononuclear cells are stimulated with the suspected drug(s). Genetic markers such as human leukocyte antigen have shown recent promise for both pre-prescription screening as well as pre-emptive and diagnostic testing strategies.

The risk of anti-osteoporotic agent-induced severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions and their association with HLA

BACKGROUND

There is increasing use of anti-osteoporotic agents (AOA) worldwide for prevention or management of patients with osteoporosis. However, there have been reports of severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR) induced by AOA. A recent study showed weak association between HLA and strontium ranelate (SR)-SCAR.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize patients with AOA-SCAR and investigate the HLA association and utility of in vitro diagnostic methods.

METHODS

We enrolled 16 cases with AOA-cutaneous adverse drug reactions (cADR), including SCAR (n = 10: 8 with Stevens-Johnson syndrome [SJS] and 2 with drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms [DRESS]) and maculopapular exanthema (MPE) (n = 6) from Taiwan and Hong Kong. We analysed the clinical characteristics, outcomes, HLA alleles and in vitro testing of AOA-SCAR, and tolerability to alternative drugs. We further performed literature review and meta-analysis on the HLA association of AOA-SCAR.

RESULTS

Our data showed strontium ranelate is the most common causality of AOA-SCAR in Asian populations. There was no cross-hypersensitivity of SR-SCAR with other AOA. HLA genotyping showed that SR-SJS was most significantly associated with HLA-A*33:03 (Pc = 5.17 × 10^-3 , OR: 25.97, 95% CI: 3.08-219.33). Meta-analysis showed that HLA-A*33:03 was associated with SR-SJS (P = 5.01 × 10^-5 ; sensitivity: 85.7%) in Asians. The sensitivity of lymphocyte activation test (LAT) for identifying the culprit drug of SR-SJS was 83.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Strontium ranelate is identified as the most notorious AOA associated with SCAR. The HLA-A*33:03 genetic allele and LAT testing may add benefits to the diagnosis of SR-SCAR in patients whose reaction developed while taking multiple drugs.

Detecting Lesional Granulysin Levels for Rapid Diagnosis of Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-Mediated Bullous Skin Disorders

BACKGROUND

Bullous skin disorders are induced by different pathomechanisms and several are emergent, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN). Rapid diagnostic methods for SJS/TEN or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL)-mediated bullous disorders are crucial for early treatment. Granulysin, primarily expressed by CTLs, is a specific cytotoxic protein responsible for SJS/TEN and similar skin reactions.

OBJECTIVE

To assess granulysin levels in blister fluids to differentiate SJS/TEN and similar CTL-mediated bullous reactions from other autoimmune bullous disorders.

METHODS

Using ELISA, we measured granulysin in blister fluids from patients with bullous skin disorders, including SJS/TEN, erythema multiforme major, bullous fixed-drug eruption, bullous lupus erythematosus, paraneoplastic pemphigus, pemphigus vulgaris, bullous pemphigoid, purpura fulminans-related bullae, and hand-foot syndrome/hand-foot-skin reactions. We compared serum and blister granulysin levels in patients with SJS/TEN presenting varying severity, monitoring serial granulysin levels from acute to late stages.

RESULTS

Overall, 144 patients presenting with bullous skin disorders were enrolled. Blister granulysin levels (mean ± SD) in CTL-mediated disorders, including TEN (n = 28; 3938.7 ± 3475.7), SJS-TEN overlapping (n = 22; 1440.4 ± 1179.6), SJS (n = 14; 542.0 ± 503.2), erythema multiforme major (n = 7; 766.3 ± 1073.7), generalized bullous fixed-drug eruption (n = 10; 720.4 ± 858.3), and localized bullous fixed-drug eruption (n = 16; 69.0 ± 56.4), were significantly higher than in non-CTL-mediated bullous disorders (P < .0001), including bullous lupus erythematosus (n = 3; 22.7 ± 20.1), paraneoplastic pemphigus (n = 3; 20.3 ± 8.6), pemphigus vulgaris (n = 3; 4.4 ± 2.8), bullous pemphigoid (n = 18; 4.0 ± 2.7), purpura fulminans (n = 4; 5.9 ± 5.5), and hand-foot syndrome/hand-foot-skin reactions (n = 6; 4.6 ± 3.5). Blister granulysin levels correlated with clinical severity of SJS/TEN (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Determination of blister granulysin levels is a noninvasive and useful tool for rapid differential diagnosis of SJS/TEN and other similar CTL-mediated bullous skin disorders for treatment selection.

Whole genome sequencing identifies genetic variants associated with co-trimoxazole hypersensitivity in Asians

BACKGROUND

Co-trimoxazole, a sulfonamide antibiotic, is used to treat a variety of infections worldwide, and it remains a common first-line medicine for prophylaxis against Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia. However, it can cause severe cutaneous adverse reaction (SCAR), including Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. The pathomechanism of co-trimoxazole-induced SCAR remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the genetic predisposition of co-trimoxazole-induced SCAR.

METHODS

We conducted a multicountry case-control association study that included 151 patients with of co-trimoxazole-induced SCAR and 4631 population controls from Taiwan, Thailand, and Malaysia, as well as 138 tolerant controls from Taiwan. Whole-genome sequencing was performed for the patients and population controls from Taiwan; it further validated the results from Thailand and Malaysia.

RESULTS

The whole-genome sequencing study (43 case patients vs 507 controls) discovered that the single-nucleotide polymorphism rs41554616, which is located between the HLA-B and MICA loci, had the strongest association with co-trimoxazole-induced SCAR (P = 8.2 × 10^-9; odds ratio [OR] = 7.7). There were weak associations of variants in co-trimoxazole-related metabolizing enzymes (CYP2D6, GSTP1, GCLC, N-acetyltransferase [NAT2], and CYP2C8). A replication study using HLA genotyping revealed that HLA-B∗13:01 was strongly associated with co-trimoxazole-induced SCAR (the combined sample comprised 91 case patients vs 2545 controls [P = 7.2 × 10^-21; OR = 8.7]). A strong HLA association was also observed in the case patients from Thailand (P = 3.2 × 10^-5; OR = 3.6) and Malaysia (P = .002; OR = 12.8), respectively. A meta-analysis and phenotype stratification study further indicated a strong association between HLA-B∗13:01 and co-trimoxazole-induced drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (P = 4.2 × 10^-23; OR = 40.1).

CONCLUSION

This study identified HLA-B∗13:01 as an important genetic factor associated with co-trimoxazole-induced SCAR in Asians.

Are apoptosis-determining techniques useful to establish an early diagnosis of acute graft-vs-host disease in pediatric patients under treatment with multiple drugs?

BACKGROUND

There are no pathognomonic histopathological features to distinguish acute graft-vs-host disease (aGVHD) from skin drug reactions (SDRs) in pediatric patients with multiple drug regimens that have received blood transfusions and/or transplants. We aimed to determine if the addition of apoptosis markers is helpful to distinguish aGVHD from SDRs in these patients.

METHODS

Skin biopsy specimens from patients with a clinical diagnosis of aGVHD or SDRs were evaluated for the presence of apoptotic bodies, satellitosis, interface damage, vasculitis, and inflammatory infiltrate on H&E stain. Information was completed with apoptotic markers (transferase-mediated dUTP nick end-labeling [TUNEL], bcl-2, and caspase-3).

RESULTS

The skin biopsy specimens of 32 patients with aGVHD and 11 with SDRs were included for study. Only the number of apoptotic keratinocytes per 10 high-power fields (hpf) showed a significant difference between both groups (P = 0.02); the presence of ≥4 apoptotic keratinocytes per 10 hpf was identified as the optimal cut-off point to discriminate aGVHD from SDRs. No SDRs cases had follicular apoptotic cells. TUNEL, bcl-2, and caspase-3 determination showed no difference between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of ≥4 apoptotic keratinocytes per 10 hpf (in aGVHD) and the absence of follicular apoptotic cells (in SDRs) might be a useful marker to distinguish between them.

Attenuation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in patients with Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrosis (TEN) are rare but life-threatening severe cutaneous adverse reactions. Current studies have suggested that the pathobiology of drug-mediated SJS/TEN involves a dysregulation of cellular immunity with overwhelming activation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes. The canonical Wnt signaling pathway plays important roles in T cell development and activation, which may provide potential avenues for alleviating dysregulated immunity in SJS/TEN. In this study, we aimed to assess the implication of Wnt signaling in drug-reactive T cells in SJS/TEN. We showed downregulation of Wnt signaling components, including T cell factor 1 (TCF-1)/lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1 (LEF-1) transcription factors, in SJS/TEN patients, suggesting that canonical Wnt signaling is regulated during cytotoxic T cell responses in SJS/TEN. Further analyses demonstrated that engagement of the T cell receptor by antigen encounter and treatment of a prognostic marker of SJS/TEN, IL-15, in vitro led to the downregulation of LEF-1 and TCF-1 expression in CD8+ T cells. Enhancement of Wnt signaling by adding the Wnt activators attenuated ex vivo activation of drug-specific T cells from SJS/TEN patients, indicating a functional involvement of Wnt signaling in the pathomechanism of SJS/TEN. These findings provide additional insight into the immunopathogenesis and therapeutic intervention of this devastating condition.

Acute exanthemas: a prospective study of 98 adult patients with an emphasis on cytokinic and metagenomic investigation

BACKGROUND

Acute exanthemas (AEs) are frequently seen; they can be caused by drugs or viruses but often the cause is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the clinical, virological and histological aspects of AEs and explore their cytokinic and metagenomic profiles.

METHODS

This prospective study examined 98 patients with AE, from February to July 2014. Clinical data were recorded in a standardized chart. Virological investigation and skin biopsies were performed. In addition, blood and skin samples were analysed for cytokines and then by a shotgun metagenomic approach. We identified five groups of patients: those with maculopapular exanthemas (MPEs) that were virally induced (group 1); those with drug-induced MPEs (group 2), those with MPEs that were both viral and drug induced (group 3), those with idiopathic MPEs (group 4) and those with pityriasis rosea (group 5).

RESULTS

A virus was identified in 29 cases (human herpesvirus 6, 72%). Cytokinic analysis of the skin (n = 23 MPEs) showed higher levels of interferon-γ and interleukin-1 receptor-α in viral MPEs, higher interleukin-33 levels in idiopathic MPEs, and higher macrophage inflammatory protein 1α levels in drug-induced MPEs. By metagenomics analysis (n = 10 MPEs), viruses identified with routine practice methods were not found in group 1 (n = 4 MPEs). However, Enterovirus A was detected in two cases, especially in a group 1 patient for whom metagenomic analysis rectified the diagnosis of the culprit agent.

CONCLUSIONS

Human herpesvirus 6 was the virus most frequently identified, and histology did not discriminate MPEs. In addition, the level of interleukin-33 seen in idiopathic MPEs suggests that an environmental factor may be the trigger for these. The results bring into question the utility of routine polymerase chain reaction analysis and viral serology for determining cause in AE. What's already known about this topic? Acute exanthemas, especially maculopapular exanthemas, are a frequent reason for patients consulting emergency and dermatology departments. It is difficult to evaluate the aetiology of acute exanthema based on the clinical aspects. Few data are available on the investigations needed in routine practice, and no prospective series have been published. What does this study add? Our study provides a global and prospective description of acute exanthemas. Cytokine analysis could help to investigate the pathophysiology of idiopathic eruptions. Metagenomic analysis provides new insights about the value of routine practice virological investigations. We show for the first time the feasibility of metagenomics analysis in the skin, which results question the interest of routine PCR and viral sérologies for the exploration of such acute exanthemas.

The Function of HLA-B*13:01 Involved in the Pathomechanism of Dapsone-Induced Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions

Dapsone-induced hypersensitivity reactions may cause severe cutaneous adverse reactions, such as drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS). It has been reported that HLA-B*13:01 is strongly associated with dapsone-induced hypersensitivity reactions among leprosy patients. However, the phenotype specificity and detailed immune mechanism of HLA-B*13:01 remain unclear. We investigated the genetic predisposition, HLA-B*13:01 function, and cytotoxic T cells involved in the pathogenesis of dapsone-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions. We enrolled patients from Taiwan and Malaysia with DRESS and maculopapular eruption with chronic inflammatory dermatoses. Our results showed that the HLA-B*13:01 allele was present in 85.7% (6/7) of patients with dapsone DRESS (odds ratio = 49.64, 95% confidence interval = 5.89-418.13; corrected P = 2.92 × 10^-4) but in only 10.8% (73/677) of general population control individuals in Taiwan. The level of granulysin, the severe cutaneous adverse reaction-specific cytotoxic protein released from cytotoxic T cells, was increased in both the plasma of DRESS patients (36.14 ± 9.02 ng/ml, P < 0.05) and in vitro lymphocyte activation test (71.4%, 5/7 patients) compared with healthy control individuals. Furthermore, dapsone-specific cytotoxic T cells were significantly activated when co-cultured with HLA-B*13:01-expressing antigen presenting cells in the presence of dapsone (3.9-fold increase, compared with cells with no HLA-B*13:01 expression; P < 0.01). This study indicates that HLA-B*13:01 is strongly associated with dapsone DRESS and describes a functional role for the HLA-restricted immune mechanism induced by dapsone.

An Updated Review of the Molecular Mechanisms in Drug Hypersensitivity

Drug hypersensitivity may manifest ranging from milder skin reactions (e.g., maculopapular exanthema and urticaria) to severe systemic reactions, such as anaphylaxis, drug reactions with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS)/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS), or Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). Current pharmacogenomic studies have made important strides in the prevention of some drug hypersensitivity through the identification of relevant genetic variants, particularly for genes encoding drug-metabolizing enzymes and human leukocyte antigens (HLAs). The associations identified by these studies are usually drug, phenotype, and ethnic specific. The drug presentation models that explain how small drug antigens might interact with HLA and T cell receptor (TCR) molecules in drug hypersensitivity include the hapten theory, the p-i concept, the altered peptide repertoire model, and the altered TCR repertoire model. The broad spectrum of clinical manifestations of drug hypersensitivity involving different drugs, as well as the various pathomechanisms involved, makes the diagnosis and management of it more challenging. This review highlights recent advances in our understanding of the predisposing factors, immune mechanisms, pathogenesis, diagnostic tools, and therapeutic approaches for drug hypersensitivity.