Repeated influenza vaccination induces similar immune protection as first-time vaccination but with differing immune responses

Effect of Current-Season-Only Versus Continuous Two-Season Influenza Vaccination on Mortality in Older Adults: A Propensity-Score-Matched Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the impact of influenza vaccination on mortality using real-world data and compared the effect of current-season-only vaccination versus continuous two-season vaccination.

METHODS

The 2017-2019 data from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Shenzhen, Guangdong, China, included 880,119 individuals aged ≥65 years. The participants were divided into vaccinated and unvaccinated groups and matched using propensity scores with a 1:4 nearest-neighbor approach. Vaccinated individuals were further divided into current-season-only and continuous two-season vaccination groups, matched 1:1. Cox's multivariable proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the effect of vaccination on all-cause mortality, with Firth's penalized likelihood method applied to correct for a few events. The Fine-Gray competing risk models were used to assess the effect of vaccination on cardio-cerebral vascular disease (CCVD) mortality. Sensitivity analyses, including caliper matching, a nested case-control design, and Poisson's regression, were performed to test the robustness of the results.

RESULTS

Influenza vaccination reduced all-cause mortality by 39% (HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.47-0.80) and 55% (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.33-0.60) in 2017-2018 and 2018-2019, respectively. Current-season-only vaccination showed stronger protective effects than continuous two-season vaccination (HR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.31-0.99). Influenza vaccination reduced CCVD mortality by 46% (HR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.34-0.84) in 2018-2019. The results were consistent across the sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Influenza vaccination was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause and CCVD mortality in older adults, underscoring the importance of routine influenza vaccination in older populations. Stronger effects were observed for current-season-only vaccination, warranting further research to confirm the association and explore mechanisms.

Repeated vaccination does not appear to significantly weaken the protective effect of influenza vaccine in the elderly: A test-negative case-control study in China

BACKGROUND

The impact of repeated influenza vaccination on vaccine effectiveness has been a topic of debate. Conducting more multinational, multicenter studies in different influenza seasons is crucial for a better understanding of this issue. There is a lack of comprehensive related research reports in China.

METHODS

Using the Regional Health Information Platform, we conducted a test-negative case-control study to evaluate the impact of repeated vaccination on the prevention of laboratory-confirmed influenza in individuals aged 60 and above in Ningbo during four influenza seasons from 2018-19 to 2021-22. Influenza-positive cases and negative controls were matched in a 1:1 ratio based on the visiting hospital and the date of influenza testing. Propensity score adjustment and multivariable logistic regression were used to estimate risk and address confounding effects.

RESULTS

During the study period, a total of 30,630 elderly patients underwent influenza virus nucleic acid or antigen testing. After exclusions, we included 1976 cases of influenza-positive and 1976 cases of influenza-negative controls. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that individuals receiving the vaccine in two consecutive seasons did not exhibit a significantly increased risk of influenza illness compared to those receiving the vaccine only in the current season (adjusted odds ratio: 1.22, 95% confidence interval: 0.94-1.58). However, the risk of influenza illness was found to be elevated in individuals who received the vaccine only in the previous season (adjusted odds ratio: 1.56, 95% confidence interval: 1.15-2.10) and even further elevated in those who had not received the vaccine in either of the consecutive two seasons (adjusted odds ratio: 3.39, 95% confidence interval: 2.80-4.09).

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of the vaccination history in the previous season, receiving the current season influenza vaccine is the best choice for the elderly population. Our study supports the initiative to vaccinate elderly individuals against influenza annually.

Neutralizing antibody responses against contemporary and future influenza A(H3N2) viruses in paradoxical clades elicited by repeated and single vaccinations

As one of the most effective measures to prevent seasonal influenza viruses, annual influenza vaccination is globally recommended. Nevertheless, evidence regarding the impact of repeated vaccination to contemporary and future influenza has been inconclusive. A total of 100 subjects singly or repeatedly immunized with influenza vaccines including 3C.2a1 or 3C.3a1 A(H3N2) during 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 influenza season were recruited. We investigated neutralization antibody by microneutralization assay using four antigenically distinct A(H3N2) viruses circulating from 2018 to 2023, and tracked the dynamics of B cell receptor (BCR) repertoire for consecutive vaccinations. We found that vaccination elicited cross-reactive antibody responses against future emerging strains. Broader neutralizing antibodies to A(H3N2) viruses and more diverse BCR repertoires were observed in the repeated vaccination. Meanwhile, a higher frequency of BCR sequences shared among the repeated-vaccinated individuals with consistently boosting antibody response was found than those with a reduced antibody response. Our findings suggest that repeated seasonal vaccination could broaden the breadth of antibody responses, which may improve vaccine protection against future emerging viruses.

Immune imprinting of SARS-CoV-2 responses: changing first immune impressions

Since the emergence of the ancestral severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus and the successful rollout of protective vaccines based on this original strain, SARS-CoV-2 has evolved into several variants, in a classical virus-host arms race typical of RNA viruses, to progressively evade the host immune response. Next-generation bivalent vaccines have been developed with broader protection against emerging variants than the ancestral vaccine. Nonetheless, even these vaccines show lower protection against the latest Omicron variants. Immune printing describes how an immune response to an immunogen is impacted by earlier exposures to a related immunogen. Several lessons about the effect of immune imprinting on responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination, including age-associated impacts, can be learned from influenza. Understanding the mechanisms of imprinting of SARS-CoV-2 will be important to inform the design of vaccines that produce broader and more durable protective immune responses to emerging variants.

Characterizing the dynamics of BCR repertoire from repeated influenza vaccination

Yearly epidemics of seasonal influenza cause an enormous disease burden around the globe. An understanding of the rules behind the immune response with repeated vaccination still presents a significant challenge, which would be helpful for optimizing the vaccination strategy. In this study, 34 healthy volunteers with 16 vaccinated were recruited, and the dynamics of the BCR repertoire for consecutive vaccinations in two seasons were tracked. In terms of diversity, length, network, V and J gene segments usage, somatic hypermutation (SHM) rate and isotype, it was found that the overall changes were stronger in the acute phase of the first vaccination than the second vaccination. However, the V gene segments of IGHV4-39, IGHV3-9, IGHV3-7 and IGHV1-69 were amplified in the acute phase of the first vaccination, with IGHV3-7 dominant. On the other hand, for the second vaccination, the changes were dominated by IGHV1-69, with potential for coding broad neutralizing antibody. Additional analysis indicates that the application of V gene segment for IGHV3-7 in the acute phase of the first vaccination was due to the elevated usage of isotypes IgM and IgG3. While for IGHV1-69 in the second vaccination, it was contributed by isotypes IgG1 and IgG2. Finally, 41 public BCR clusters were identified in the vaccine group, with both IGHV3-7 and IGHV1-69 were involved and representative complementarity determining region 3 (CDR3) motifs were characterized. This study provides insights into the immune response dynamics following repeated influenza vaccination in humans and can inform universal vaccine design and vaccine strategies in the future.

Immunogenicity and Safety of One versus Two Doses of Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (IIV4) in Vaccine-Unprimed Children and One Dose of IIV4 in Vaccine-Primed Children Aged 3-8 Years

Two doses of the inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) are generally recommended for children under 9 years old. This study assessed the necessity for a second dose of quadrivalent IIV (IIV4) in children aged 3-8 years. In this randomized, open-label, paralleled-controlled study, 400 children aged 3-8 years who were vaccine-unprimed were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive a two-dose (Group 1) or one-dose (Group 2) regimen of IIV4, and 200 who were vaccine-primed received one dose of IIV4 (Group 3). A serum sample was collected before and 28 days after the last dose to determine the hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody level. Adverse events were collected within 28 days after each dose. One-dose or two-doses of IIV4 were well tolerated and safe in children aged 3-8 years, and no serious adverse events related to the vaccine were reported. The seroconversion rates (SCRs) of HI antibody ranged from 61.86% to 95.86%, and the post-vaccination seroprotection rates (SPRs) were all >70% in three groups against the four virus strains. The two-dose regimen in vaccine-unprimed participants (Group 1) achieved similar SPRs in comparison with the one-dose in the vaccine-primed group (Group 3), and the SPRs in Group 1 and Group 3 were higher in vaccine-unprimed participants of the one-dose regimen (Group 2). The present study supports the recommendations of a two-dose regimen for IIV4 use in children aged 3-8 years.