A case of combined nevus: compound nevus and spindle cell Spitz nevus

Differentiation of combined nevi and melanomas: Case-control study with comparative analysis of dermoscopic features

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Combined nevi (CN) show two or more components of major nevus subtypes and simulate melanomas. We investigated a panel of dermoscopic features and three dermoscopic algorithms for differentiating CN from melanomas.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective, blinded case-control study using dermoscopic images of 36 CN and 36 melanoma controls. Twenty-one dermoscopic features validated for the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions, the number of colors, and three dermoscopic algorithms were investigated (ABCD rule of dermoscopy, Menzies scoring method, 7-point checklist).

RESULTS

Five of seven features indicative of nevi were observed significantly more frequently in CN than in melanomas (all p < 0.05) and two were exclusively found in CN. Eleven out of 14 features indicative of melanomas were observed significantly more frequently in melanomas than in CN (all p < 0.03) and five were exclusively found in melanomas. The mean (± SD) number of colors in CN was lower than in melanomas (2.1 ± 0.6 versus 3.4 ± 0.7; p < 0.001). Among tested algorithms the ABCD rule of dermoscopy performed best (sensitivity 91.7 %, specificity 77.8 %).

CONCLUSIONS

The ABCD rule of dermoscopy differentiated CN from melanomas most efficiently. Additional knowledge of dermoscopic features to be expected exclusively in either CN or melanomas should help dermatologists to make a correct clinical diagnosis.

Combined naevus: a benign lesion frequently misdiagnosed both clinically and pathologically as melanoma

BACKGROUND

Combined naevi are characterised pathologically by the presence of two or more different types of melanocytic naevi in a single lesion. They are prone to clinical and pathological misdiagnosis as melanoma. Misdiagnosis may result in inappropriate treatment, patient anxiety and medicolegal consequences.

AIMS

With the aim of reducing the incidence of misdiagnosis, this study documents the clinical and pathological features of a large series of combined naevi and describes how to distinguish them from melanoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The slides of skin lesions from 220 patients that were coded as combined naevus between 1990 and 2001 were retrieved from the archival files of the Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia. The clinical notes, letters from referring pathologists (for consultation cases) and slides were reviewed and for each lesion clinical and pathological features were assessed. Thirty-eight cases were excluded either because they included only one naevus component or because there were atypical pathological features in the slides available for review. The remaining 182 cases formed the study population.

RESULTS

The patients included 92 females and 87 males (1.1:1). In three cases the gender was not known. Mean and median patient ages were 29.6 and 28 years, respectively. The anatomical site of involvement was the trunk in 64 cases (35.2%), head and neck region in 43 cases (23.6%), upper extremity in 40 cases (22.0%), lower extremity in 18 cases (9.9%) and perineum and buttock region in eight cases (4.4%). In nine cases the site of involvement was not known. A pre-operative clinical diagnosis was recorded in 126 cases; of these, melanoma was suspected clinically in 33 cases (26.2%) while combined naevus was diagnosed clinically in only three cases (2.4%). Histologically, 180 cases included two different naevus components, and in two cases three different naevus components were present. The most common combination was a common acquired naevus of compound type associated with a blue naevus of deep penetrating naevus type; this occurred in 57 cases (31.3%). The referring pathologist recorded a preferred diagnosis in 88 of 122 consultation cases; of these, melanoma was suspected in 23 cases (26.1%) and in 23 cases combined naevus was favoured (26.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined naevus is an uncommon type of melanocytic naevus that is frequently misdiagnosed both clinically and pathologically. Knowledge and recognition of the pathological features of combined naevi and the important features that distinguish them from melanomas should reduce the frequency of misdiagnosis.

Pathology of melanocytic lesions: New, controversial, and clinically important issues

Patients with primary cutaneous melanocytic lesions rely not only on the knowledge, skills, and experience of their treating clinician but also on the fundamentally important input of their pathologist for accurate diagnosis and appropriate management. Free and precise communication between pathologists and surgeons is important and undoubtedly improves patient care, particularly when managing difficult or complicated cases. To provide both patient and surgeon with the necessary information they require to make the most appropriate decisions, the pathology report should include all pathologic factors that are important in determining the patient's prognosis and management. Use of a synoptic format for pathology reporting of melanomas can facilitate this. Recent studies have established that the dermal mitotic rate of a primary cutaneous melanoma is a major prognostic determinant, and have shown that its assessment and that of other important histopathologic prognostic variables are reproducible between pathologists. Sentinel node (SN) biopsy has provided a minimally invasive procedure that can accurately predict the regional node status of melanoma patients. It is well demonstrated that the use of immunohistochemical stains assists in the detection of melanoma micrometastases in SNs, although it remains unclear which is the optimal pathologic protocol for SN evaluation and whether there is a role for reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in SN assessment. False negative SN biopsies may occur as a result of errors in lymphatic mapping or sentinel lymphadenectomy, or because of a deficiency in the process of histopathologic evaluation. Recent studies have shown that the likelihood of non-SN involvement when the SN is positive correlates mostly with the extent of SN involvement, in particular the tumor penetrative depth (defined as the maximum distance of melanoma cells from the inner margin of the SN capsule). It appears that assessment of the micromorphometric features of positive SNs may be useful in predicting which patients have a low probability of having metastatic tumor in non-SNs, and therefore in selecting patients who potentially may be spared a completion lymph node dissection. It is likely that future advances in our understanding of the molecular biology of melanoma will provide new insights into tumor classification, improve diagnostic accuracy and prognostic ability, and lead to the development of more precisely targeted therapies.

Spitz nevus and its histologic simulators

Spitz nevi continue to pose a considerable diagnostic challenge to the histopathologist. Key features of Spitz nevus and its variants are discussed and contrasted with the telltale signs of malignancy of "Spitzoid" melanomas. The importance of the histologic features of the deep, rather than superficial, part of the lesions is emphasized.