Pantoprazole versus omeprazole in the treatment of acute gastric ulcers

Efficacy of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers Versus Proton Pump Inhibitors for Gastric Ulcers: Bayesian and Frequentist Network Meta-Analysis With Cross-Inference Through a Quality management System

Purpose

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been the mainstay treatment for gastric ulcer (GU) for over 30 years. However, since the discovery of a new class of acid suppressants, potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs), the desire for a therapeutic agent has continued and the clinical trials on P-CABs have been conducted. In this regard, we aimed to assess whether P-CABs are noninferior to PPIs in patients with GU in terms of efficacy.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Additionally, we used a new methodology of inference concept with the purpose of grouping between P-CABs and PPIs. Moreover, our quality management system was integrated throughout the research to ensure data accuracy.

Findings

We initially screened 438 studies and extracted 10 homogeneous GU RCTs with 6315 participants. The odds ratios (ORs) for the 4-week cure rate in Bayesian + frequentist NMA, tegoprazan 100 mg (OR = 4.14, 95% credible interval [CI] 0.56-26.3) and pantoprazole 40 mg (OR = 4.12, 95% CI 1.90-8.88) were the largest, respectively. The ORs for the 8-week cure rate in Bayesian + frequentist NMA, lansoprazole 30 mg (OR = 8.77, 95% credible interval [CI] 0.95-78.9) and lansoprazole 30 mg (OR = 7.91, 95% CI 2.60-24.03) was the largest, respectively.

Conclusions

The results of the NMA reveal that the cure rates of P-CABs in cases of GU were not inferior to those of PPIs. As the inference by grouping PPIs and P-CABs, the results showed similar trends in terms of effectiveness between the two therapeutic classes.

Efficacy and safety of vonoprazan versus proton pump inhibitors in the treatment of peptic ulcer disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis for randomized controlled trails

Background and aims

Vonoprazan, a novel acid suppressant, has been employed in the treatment of peptic ulcer disease in recent years. However, the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan versus proton-pump inhibitors remains controversial. To address this gap, a systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan in comparison with various proton-pump inhibitors.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials that met selection criteria in PubMed (Medline), EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched up to July 15, 2024. The primary outcome was ulcer healing rate. Secondary outcomes were treatment-emergent adverse events and drug-related adverse events. Effect size on outcomes is presented as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

Results

Thirty-five randomized controlled trials containing 9,544 participants were included. In terms of the healing rate at 2 weeks, lansoprazole 30 mg ranked first, followed by vonoprazan 20 mg and ilaprazole 10 mg. In terms of the healing rate at 4 weeks, pantoprazole 40 mg ranked first, with rabeprazole 10 mg and lansoprazole 30 mg ranking second and third, respectively. Regarding the healing rate at 8 weeks, lansoprazole 30 mg is demonstrated to be the most efficacious regimen. Moreover, subgroup analysis indicated that lansoprazole 30 mg is the optimal regimen in the treatment of artificial gastric ulcer at 4 and 8 weeks. Importantly, lansoprazole 30 mg has fewer adverse reactions and higher safety.

Conclusion

The optimal regimen for the treatment of peptic ulcer disease may be lansoprazole 30 mg at 2 and 8 weeks, while pantoprazole 40 mg has demonstrated superior performance at the 4-week when compared to vonoprazan 20 mg. Furthermore, lansoprazole 30 mg has shown to be superior in terms of safety outcomes. These findings, derived from a network meta-analysis, necessitate further research for validation.

Type of proton-pump inhibitor and risk of iron deficiency in kidney transplant recipients - results from the TransplantLines Biobank and Cohort Study

Proton‐pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been associated with iron deficiency (ID) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Gastric acid plays a pivotal role in the intestinal absorption of non‐heme iron, but the pharmacodynamics of PPIs differs in potency of acid suppression. We hypothesized that the risk of ID might be lower in KTRs using a less potent PPI. In a cohort of 724 KTRs from the TransplantLines Biobank and Cohort Study (NCT03272841), PPI use was associated with ID [odds ratio (OR) 2.02; 95% CI 1.36–2.98]. Compared with no PPI use, the point estimate of the odds ratio for risk of ID for pantoprazole (OR 1.55; 95%CI 0.78–3.10) was lower than for esomeprazole and omeprazole (3.58; 95%CI 1.73–7.40 and 1.96; 95%CI 1.31–2.94, respectively). When comparing pantoprazole users with omeprazole users on an equipotent dose (≤20 omeprazole equivalents (OE)/day) omeprazole, but not pantoprazole was associated with ID, although the lack of a significant effect of pantoprazole on the risk of ID could be caused by a lack of power. Furthermore, risk of ID was higher among users of a high PPI dose (≥ 20 OE/day) and OE as continuous variable was also independently associated with ID, indicating that risk of ID is higher while using a more potent PPI. Further investigation seems warranted to confirm whether pantoprazole leads to less ID in KTRs.

Pantoprazole: a proton pump inhibitor with oral and intravenous formulations

Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are a significant part of therapy for most acid-related diseases including gastroesophageal reflux disease, peptic ulcer disease and acute gastrointestinal bleeding. Pantoprazole is one of several available proton pump inhibitor agents and provides dose-dependent control of gastric acid secretion. Pantoprazole has indications in gastroesophageal reflux disease and peptic ulcer disease, along with indications as co-therapy in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection and in the control of the acid secretion associated with the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, as well as in NSAID ulcer prevention. Pantoprazole is available in both oral and intravenous formulations. It is effective across all age groups, although only indicated in adults (and adolescents in Europe). It has been approved for use in over 100 countries and has been used for over 13 years. Pantoprazole has an excellent safety profile and a low potential for drug-drug interactions. While still widely prescribed, pantoprazole and the other branded proton pump inhibitors are under considerable market pressure from the less expensive but similarly effective generic and over-the-counter formulations of omeprazole.

Pantoprazole: a new and more specific proton pump inhibitor

Pantoprazole is the third proton pump inhibitor (PPI) to be launched for the treatment of acid-peptic diseases. Like other drugs in this class, pantoprazole causes long-lasting inhibition of acid secretion by inactivating the parietal cell H+/K+-ATPase. Compared with H2 antagonists, pantoprazole results in faster pain relief, more rapid ulcer healing, healing of resistant ulcers and far greater efficacy in oesophageal reflux disease. The three PPIs currently available display almost identical efficacy in the treatment of acid-peptic diseases and when included as part of Helicobacter pylori eradication regimes. However, pantoprazole shows improvements in selectivity and pharmacokinetic properties compared with omeprazole and lansoprazole. The bioavailability of pantoprazole is considerably higher than omeprazole, remains constant upon repeated dosing, and is unaffected by food. Significantly, pantoprazole does not influence hepatic cytochrome P450 activity and does not therefore interact with co-administered drugs. This is in contrast to omeprazole, which inhibits P450, and lansoprazole, which appears to weakly induce multiple metabolic pathways. Although pantoprazole is entering an antisecretory market dominated by omeprazole and ranitidine, it has a number of potential advantages. In this respect it is worth recalling that enhanced specificity and the absence of drug interactions were decisive factors in determining market share in the H2 antagonist era. Pantoprazole may therefore achieve significant market penetration, particularly at the expense of lansoprazole and the H2 blockers.

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori by 7-day triple-therapy regimens combining pantoprazole with clarithromycin, metronidazole, or amoxicillin in patients with peptic ulcer disease: results of two double-blind, randomized studies

AIM

To compare the short-term (7-day) safety and efficacy of two triple-therapy regimens using pantoprazole with those of two dual-therapy regimens (one with pantoprazole and one without), for Helicobacter pylori eradication in patients with peptic ulcer disease.

METHODS

H. pylori infection was identified by rapid urease (CLOtest), and confirmed by histology and culture. Patients were enrolled into one of two randomized, double-blind, multicenter, parallel-group studies. In study A, patients received oral pantoprazole 40 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and metronidazole 500 mg (PCM); pantoprazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin 1000 mg (PCA); or pantoprazole and clarithromycin (PC). In study B, patients received PCM, PCA, PC, or clarithromycin and metronidazole without pantoprazole (CM). Treatments were given twice daily for 7 days. H. pylori status after therapy was assessed by histology and culture at 4 weeks after completing the course of study treatment. Modified intent-to-treat (MITT; each study: n = 424, n = 512) and per-protocol (PP; each study: n = 371, n = 454) populations were analyzed. The MITT population comprised all patients whose positive H. pylori status was confirmed by culture and histology; the PP population comprised patients who also complied with > or = 85% of study medication doses.

RESULTS

A total of 1016 patients were enrolled. Cure rates among patients with clarithromycin-susceptible H. pylori strains were 82 and 86% for PCM, and 72 and 71% for PCA, in studies A and B, respectively. Cure rates among patients with metronidazole-susceptible H. pylori strains were 82 and 87% for PCM, and 71 and 69% for PCA, in studies A and B, respectively. The combined eradication rates observed with the PCM regimen were superior to those of all other regimens tested. Side-effects were infrequent and mild.

CONCLUSIONS

PCM had the highest overall eradication rate in these two studies examining 7-day treatment regimens. All regimens were safe and well tolerated.

Direct comparative trials of the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors in the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and peptic ulcer disease

BACKGROUND

Five proton pump inhibitors are now available for use in North America. Claims of differences in the clinical efficacy of different strengths and/or agents have been made.

AIM

To identify any consistent evidence of differences in outcomes between agents or doses within this class of drugs.

METHODS

A search of the medical literature was performed in two electronic databases, and randomized controlled trials of higher quality were included in the assessment.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Thirty-two trials met our criteria. No convincing data were found to indicate that low doses of proton pump inhibitors are as effective as standard doses of proton pump inhibitors in the healing of erosive oesophagitis or in the relief of symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease; however, they may be as effective as maintenance therapy for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and peptic ulcer disease. Differences were found between the standard doses of proton pump inhibitors with regard to the onset of symptom relief in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (lansoprazole was faster than omeprazole, and esomeprazole was faster than both lansoprazole and omeprazole) and the healing of oesophagitis (esomeprazole was superior to both omeprazole and lansoprazole). Despite these differences, there are as yet insufficient data to establish the superiority of any one agent over all others across all disease states treated with these agents.

Meta-analysis: comparing the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors in short-term use

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors have a prominent role in the management of acid-related diseases. Controlling expenses on proton pump inhibitors would yield great economic benefits for Dutch health care.

AIM

To investigate whether clinical differences in proton pump inhibitors exist.

METHODS

We searched Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library. We identified papers in English, German, French or Dutch in which two or more proton pump inhibitors were compared under the same clinical conditions in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, peptic ulcer disease or Helicobacter pylori eradication. The pooled relative risks were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method.

RESULTS

Two significant differences were found in the proton pump inhibitors compared. In gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, esomeprazole 40 mg was superior to omeprazole 20 mg (relative risk, 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.23). In peptic ulcer disease, pantoprazole 40 mg was superior to omeprazole 20 mg (relative risk, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.13). In Helicobacter pylori eradication, no significant differences were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Both significant differences found were in favour of the highest dose of proton pump inhibitor on a milligram basis. This indicates that the difference may be dose dependent and not proton pump inhibitor specific. Therefore, when prescribing proton pump inhibitors, arguments other than clinical efficacy, such as those related to pharmaco-economics, may be considered.

A pharmacoeconomic comparison of the efficacy and costs of pantoprazole and omeprazole for the treatment of peptic ulcer or gastroesophageal reflux disease in The Netherlands

BACKGROUND

The focus of treatment of patients with peptic ulcer or gastroesuphageal reflux disease has changed during the last 15 years, with a shift from histamine2-receptor antagonists to proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs). From 1993 to 2000, expenditures for omeprazole (90% of total market share of PPIs) increased in The Netherlands from 68 million euros to 230 million euros. In 1999, expenditures for pantoprazole accounted for the majority of the rest of the market share for PPIs.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and costs of treatment with pantoprazole and omeprazole in The Netherlands.

METHODS

First, we reviewed clinical studies that compared the efficacy of different dosages of omeprazole and pantoprazole. Second, we analyzed data from a nationwide database of drug prescriptions to determine the dosages used in daily practice in 1999. The data were based on a representative sample of approximately 40% of the Dutch community pharmacies. Third, we modeled the outcome of potential substitution of pantoprazole for omeprazole and the corresponding scenarios for nationwide cost savings using the prescription information from the nationwide database. Potential savings within the Dutch health care system were estimated.

RESULTS

The 1999 prescription data indicated that pantoprazole treatment cost a mean 1.59 euros/d, compared with 2.12 euros/d for omeprazole (1.00 euro = 1.0487 US dollars). The mean cost per defined daily dose of omeprazole was 1.65 euros, compared with 1.59 euros for pantoprazole. Following the summary of product characteristics, treatment with pantoprazole appeared to be less costly for all indications. The projected annual cost savings for substituting pantoprazole for omeprazole on 90% of treatment days were estimated at 40.8 million euros. However, these projected savings may be offset by the costs of switching and the costs of upward dose adjustments that some patients may require.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the available documentation about effectiveness and costs of omeprazole and pantoprazole, pantoprazole may provide a more favorable pharmacoeconomic profile than omeprazole. However, this is only true if the substitution of omeprazole by pantoprazole can be achieved without loss of efficacy or tolerability.

Are proton pump inhibitors the first choice for acute treatment of gastric ulcers? A meta analysis of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Gastric ulcers are a frequent problem in the United States. Proton pump inhibitors have been shown to increase healing rates and improve clinical symptoms. The objective of this study is to compare gastric ulcer healing rates for patients treated with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) (omeprazole, rabeprazole, pantoprazole, or lansoprazole), an histamine 2- receptor antagonist (ranitidine) or placebo.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted to identify randomized, controlled clinical trials that included a PPI in at least one treatment arm and assessed the gastric ulcer healing rates endoscopically. The healing rates were estimated for each treatment at specific time points, and Rate Ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated for each trial.

RESULTS

Sixteen trials met the inclusion criteria: four compared a PPI versus placebo, nine compared a PPI versus ranitidine (no trials of rabeprazole versus ranitidine met the inclusion criteria), and three compared a newer PPI (lansoprazole, pantoprazole or rabeprazole) versus omeprazole. In relation to ranitidine, the pooled RR of PPIs (lansoprazole, omeprazole and pantoprazole) was 1.33 (95% CI 1.24 to 1.42) at four weeks. In each trial, greater improvement in the studied clinical symptoms was found with the newer PPIs (rabeprazole, pantoprazole and lansoprazole) when compared to omeprazole.

CONCLUSION

In this study treatment with PPIs resulted in higher healing rates than ranitidine or placebo. This evidence suggests that the first choice for gastric ulcer treatment for the greater relief of symptoms is one of the newer PPIs.

Dose-dependent control of intragastric pH by pantoprazole, 10, 20 or 40 mg, in healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors have emerged as the most effective class of drugs for the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux. Pantoprazole is a proton pump inhibitor that has demonstrated high clinical efficacy.

AIM

To evaluate the effect of once-daily doses of pantoprazole, 10, 20 and 40 mg, on gastric acidity in healthy volunteers.

METHODS

Thirty-six subjects received pantoprazole in a three-way crossover design study. Ambulatory 24-h intragastric pH and distal oesophageal pH were monitored at baseline and on the last day of each treatment period. The measured endpoints were the median intragastric and oesophageal pH, the percentage of time the intragastric pH < 4 and oesophageal pH < 4 and the area under the curve for gastric acidity over 24 h. Safety was evaluated by incidence and severity of adverse events.

RESULTS

Pantoprazole demonstrated a linear dose- dependent suppression of gastric acidity over the dose range 10-40 mg. The dose of 40 mg demonstrated a significantly greater response than the lower doses, particularly at night. All pantoprazole doses were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Pantoprazole demonstrates a dose-related effect in the range 10-40 mg once daily. The once-daily dose of 40 mg provides the highest and most consistent control of gastric pH, especially at night.

Are the orally administered proton pump inhibitors equivalent? A comparison of lansoprazole, omeprazole, pantoprazole, and rabeprazole

Four proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are currently marketed in various parts of the world, and all of these (lansoprazole, omeprazole, pantoprazole, and rabeprazole) are available for prescription use in the United States. As a therapeutic group, the PPIs are highly useful for the relief of symptoms and healing of gastroesophageal reflux disease, gastric and duodenal ulcer disease, eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection, prevention and treatment of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-associated damage, management of hypersecretory states such as Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, and care of patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding, or non-ulcer dyspepsia. The pathophysiologic basis of these management benefits lies in the potent gastric acid inhibitory effects of the PPIs. There are differences between the PPIs in their pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, influence by food and antacids, clinical efficacy, and potential for drug interactions. It is not always clear whether these often subtle variations are necessarily of clinical importance. The physician's choice of one PPI over another must rest with her/his interpretation of the clinical importance of the generally small differences between PPIs, their approval for treatment of specific clinical indications within the physician's practice jurisdiction, and the strength of the evidence based on the quantity and quality of the supporting clinical trials.

Pantoprazole: a new proton pump inhibitor

OBJECTIVE

This paper reviews the pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and tolerability of pantoprazole in comparison with those of other available proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).

METHODS

Relevant English-language research and review articles were identified by database searches of MEDLINE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and UnCover, and by examining the reference lists of the articles so identified. In selecting data for inclusion, the author gave preference to full-length articles published in peer-reviewed journals.

RESULTS

Like other PPIs, pantoprazole exerts its pharmacodynamic actions by binding to the proton pump (H+,K+ -adenosine triphosphatase) in the parietal cells, but, compared with other PPIs, its binding may be more specific for the proton pump. Pantoprazole is well absorbed when administered as an enteric-coated, delayed-release tablet, with an oral bioavailability of approximately 77%. It is hepatically metabolized via cytochrome P2C19 to hydroxypantoprazole, an inactive metabolite that subsequently undergoes sulfate conjugation. The elimination half-life ranges from 0.9 to 1.9 hours and is independent of dose. Pantoprazole has similar efficacy to other PPIs in the healing of gastric and duodenal ulcers, as well as erosive esophagitis, and as part of triple-drug regimens for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori from the gastric mucosa. It is well tolerated, with the most common adverse effects being headache, diarrhea, flatulence, and abdominal pain. In clinical studies, it has been shown to have no interactions with various other agents, including carbamazepine, cisapride, cyclosporine, digoxin, phenytoin, theophylline, and warfarin.

CONCLUSIONS

Pantoprazole appears to be as effective as other PPIs. Its low potential for drug interactions may give it an advantage in patients taking other drugs.

Review article: comparison of the pharmacokinetics, acid suppression and efficacy of proton pump inhibitors

Proton pump inhibitors have dramatically influenced the management of acid-peptic disorders in recent years. They all have a broadly similar mechanism of action and are extensively metabolized in the liver via cytochromes P450 2C19 and 3A4. There is some variation in their potential for drug interactions due to differences in enzyme inhibition. Relatively few serious adverse effects have been reported for the proton pump inhibitors. Comparative studies of acid suppression suggest that lansoprazole and pantoprazole have a potency similar to that of omeprazole on a mg for mg basis; however, rabeprazole may have a greater potency than omeprazole. Lansoprazole and rabeprazole display a more rapid onset of maximal acid suppression than the other proton pump inhibitors. Comparative studies using proton pump inhibitors for the treatment of reflux oesophagitis, duodenal ulcer healing and Helicobacter pylori eradication show little overall difference in outcome between the proton pump inhibitors when used in their standard doses. Lansoprazole and rabeprazole provide earlier and better symptom relief than the other proton pump inhibitors in some studies of peptic ulcer treatment. The few studies of gastric ulcer treatment suggest that there is an advantage in using the proton pump inhibitors that have a higher standard daily dose.

Pantoprazole, Prout and the proton pump

Pantoprazole is a proton pump inhibitor which has recently had its clinical license extended to include maintenance therapy for the treatment of reflux oesophagitis, Helicobacter pylori eradication and short-term intravenous administration. This article reviews the history of gastric acid secretion and examines the role of proton pump inhibitors, particularly pantoprazole, in the treatment of acid-related disorders.

Proton pump inhibitors. Pharmacology and rationale for use in gastrointestinal disorders

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are drugs which irreversibly inhibit proton pump (H+/K+ ATPase) function and are the most potent gastric acid-suppressing agents in clinical use. There is now a substantial body of evidence showing improved efficacy of PPIs over the histamine H2 receptor antagonists and other drugs in acid-related disorders. Omeprazole 20 mg/day, lansoprazole 30 mg/day, pantoprazole 40 mg/day or rabeprazole 20 mg/day for 2 to 4 weeks are more effective than standard doses of H2-receptor antagonists in healing duodenal and gastric ulcers. Patients with gastric ulcers should receive standard doses of PPIs as for duodenal ulcers but for a longer time period (4 to 8 weeks). There is no conclusive evidence to support the use of a particular PPI over another for either duodenal or gastric ulcer healing. For Helicobacter pylori-positive duodenal ulceration, a combination of a PPI and 2 antibacterials will eradicate H. pylori in over 90% of cases and significantly reduce ulcer recurrence. Patients with H. pylori-positive gastric ulcers should be managed similarly. PPIs also have efficacy advantages over ranitidine and misoprostol and are better tolerated than misoprostol in patients taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). In endoscopically proven gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, standard daily doses of the PPIs are more effective than H2-receptor antagonists for healing, and patients should receive a 4 to 8 week course of treatment. For severe reflux, with ulceration and/or stricture formation, a higher dose regimen (omeprazole 40 mg, lansoprazole 60 mg, pantoprazole 80 mg or rabeprazole 40 mg daily) appears to yield better healing rates. There is little evidence that PPIs lead to resolution of Barrett's oesophagus or a reduction of subsequent adenocarcinoma development, but PPIs are indicated in healing of any associated ulceration. In Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, PPIs have become the treatment of choice for the management of gastric acid hypersecretion.

Comparison of rabeprazole 20 mg vs. omeprazole 20 mg in the treatment of active gastric ulcer--a European multicentre study. The European Rabeprazole Study Group

BACKGROUND

Rabeprazole sodium is the newest member of a class of substituted benzimidazole molecules known as proton pump inhibitors. Other proton pump inhibitors have been shown to be effective in healing active, benign gastric ulcers.

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, multicentre study, conducted at 25 European sites, rabeprazole and omeprazole were compared in patients with active gastric ulcers. Two hundred and twenty-seven patients with active benign gastric ulcer were randomized to receive either rabeprazole 20 mg (n = 113) or omeprazole 20 mg (n = 114) once daily for 3 or 6 weeks, with healing monitored by endoscopy.

RESULTS

After 3 weeks, complete healing (ITT analysis) was documented in 58% of patients given rabeprazole and 61% in patients given omeprazole (N.S.). After 6 weeks the healing rates were identical in both groups at 91%. Rabeprazole-treated patients had numerically greater symptom relief at all 12 points of comparison. The differences significantly favoured rabeprazole at week 3 for daytime pain improvement (P = 0.023) and at week 6 for pain frequency (P = 0.006) and complete resolution of night pain (P = 0.022). Both drugs were well-tolerated over the 6-week treatment course. Mean changes from baseline to end-point in fasting serum gastrin were comparable. No significant differences in laboratory parameters were seen.

CONCLUSION

In this study, rabeprazole produced healing rates comparable to omeprazole at weeks 3 and 6, but provided more consistent and occasionally significantly superior symptom improvement. Both treatments were well-tolerated.

Growth inhibitory and bactericidal activities of lansoprazole compared with those of omeprazole and pantoprazole against Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori plays a role in the pathogenesis of both duodenal and gastric ulcers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the proton pump inhibitor (PPI), lansoprazole, commonly used in eradication regimens, on growth, bactericidal activity and morphology of H. pylori in vitro in comparison with other PPIs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Growth inhibitory activity of each of the PPIs was evaluated by determining minimum inhibitory concentrations using an agar dilution method. Bactericidal activity was determined by analysis of the viable cells in culture at various time points after incubation with different concentrations of the PPIs. Bacterial morphology was examined using scanning electron microscopy of fixed cells after exposure to the test substances. Urease activity in cell extracts of H. pylori that had been incubated with increasing concentrations of the PPIs was determined by colorimetry.

RESULTS

The growth inhibitory activity of lansoprazole was significantly more potent than that of omeprazole or pantoprazole (MIC90 6.25 vs. 25 and 100 micrograms/ml, respectively). Exposure of H. pylori to lansoprazole produced loss of viability and an aberrant bacterial morphology, which was more extensive than seen with omeprazole or pantoprazole. Lansoprazole dose dependently inhibited urease activity; its effectiveness was comparable with omeprazole but more potent than pantoprazole.

CONCLUSIONS

The mechanism of action that leads to loss of viability of H. pylori cells appears to differ between the three PPIs investigated; lansoprazole was the most potent of the three agents in terms of growth inhibition and disruption of bacterial morphology.

Pantoprazole. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in acid-related disorders

Pantoprazole is an irreversible proton pump inhibitor which, at the therapeutic dose of 40mg, effectively reduces gastric acid secretion. In controlled clinical trials, pantoprazole (40mg once daily) has proved superior to ranitidine (300mg once daily or 150mg twice daily) and equivalent to omeprazole (20mg once daily) in the short term (< or = 8 weeks) treatment of acute peptic ulcer and reflux oesophagitis. Gastric and duodenal ulcer healing proceeded significantly faster with pantoprazole than with ranitidine, and at similar rates with pantoprazole and omeprazole. The time course of gastric ulcer pain relief was similar with pantoprazole, ranitidine and omeprazole, whereas duodenal ulcer pain was alleviated more rapidly with pantoprazole than ranitidine. Pantoprazole (40mg once daily) showed superior efficacy to famotidine (40mg once daily) in ulcer healing and pain relief after 2 weeks in patients with duodenal ulcer in a large multicentre nonblinded study. In mild to moderate acute reflux oesophagitis, significantly greater healing was obtained with pantoprazole than with ranitidine and famotidine, whereas similar healing rates were seen with pantoprazole and omeprazole. Pantoprazole showed a significant advantage over ranitidine in relieving symptoms of heartburn and acid regurgitation. Reflux symptoms were similarly alleviated by pantoprazole and omeprazole. Preliminary results indicate that triple therapy with pantoprazole, clarithromycin and either metronidazole or tinidazole is effective in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori-associated disease; however, these findings require confirmation in large well-controlled studies. Pantoprazole appears to be well tolerated during short term oral administration, with diarrhoea (1.5%), headache (1.3%), dizziness (0.7%), pruritus (0.5%) and skin rash (0.4%) representing the most frequent adverse events. The drug has lower affinity than omeprazole or lansoprazole for hepatic cytochrome P450 and shows no clinically relevant pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interactions at therapeutic doses with a wide range of drug substrates for this isoenzyme system. In conclusion, pantoprazole is superior to ranitidine and as effective as omeprazole in the short term treatment of peptic ulcer and reflux oesophagitis, has shown efficacy when combined with antibacterial agents in H. pylori eradication, is apparently well tolerated and offers the potential advantage of minimal risk of drug interaction.