Review article: hepatitis C virus infection and type-2 diabetes mellitus in renal diseases and transplantation

Global Epidemiology, Health Outcomes, and Treatment Options for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Kidney Failure

The burden of type 2 diabetes and related complications has steadily increased over the last few decades and is one of the foremost global public health threats in the 21st century. Diabetes is one of the leading causes of chronic kidney disease and kidney failure and is an important contributor to the cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in this population. In addition, up to one in three patients who have received kidney transplants develop post-transplant diabetes, but the management of this common complication continues to pose a significant challenge for clinicians. In this review, we will describe the global prevalence and temporal trend of kidney failure attributed to diabetes mellitus in both developing and developed countries. We will examine the survival differences between treated kidney failure patients with and without type 2 diabetes, focusing on the survival differences in those on maintenance dialysis or have received kidney transplants. With the increased availability of novel hypoglycemic agents, we will address the potential impacts of these novel agents in patients with diabetes and kidney failure and in those who have developed post-transplant diabetes.

Hepatitis C virus infection and development of type 2 diabetes mellitus: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is an endocrine disorder encompassing multifactorial mechanisms, and chronic hepatitis C virus infection (CHC) is a multifaceted disorder, associated with extrahepatic manifestations, including endocrinological disorders. CHC and T2DM are associated, but the subject remains controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating such association, searching on PubMed until February 29, 2016. Inclusion criteria were: 1) presence of at least one internal control group age- and gender-matched (non-hepatopathic controls; and/or hepatopathic, not HCV-positive, controls); 2) sufficient data to calculate odds ratio and relative risk. Exclusion criteria were: 1) literature reviews on the topic; 2) publications regarding special populations [human immunodeficiency virus and human T-lymphotropic virus-1 coinfections, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), post-transplantation DM, gender selection]; 3) no clear differentiation among HCV patients with CHC, cirrhosis or HCC. Data from each study were independently extracted by two reviewers and cross-checked by AA. Our systematic review returned 544 records, and 33 were included in our meta-analysis. HCV infection is associated with an increased risk of T2DM independently from the severity of the associated liver disease, in CHC and cirrhotic HCV patients. As expected T2DM risk is higher in cirrhotic HCV patients, than CHC, and the prevalence of HCV infection in T2DM patients is higher than in non-diabetic controls. Regarding HBV infection prevalence, no difference exists in diabetic and non-diabetic subjects. An unequivocal CHC and T2DM association was shown. A proactive, integrated approach to HCV and T2DM therapies should maximize benefits of both diseases treatment.

To study the prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance in patients with hepatitis C virus related chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C infection is a major cause of Chronic Liver Disease and the prevalence of Diabetes Mellitus is also high. Diabetes has been hypothesised as one of Extrahepatic manifestations of Hepatitis C.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The objective of our study was to study the prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance in patients with HCV related liver disease.

STUDY DESIGN

The study was a prospective study conducted over a period of one and half year in Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted taking total of 100 Hepatitis C virus positive patients above 40 years of age who had fasting blood glucose levels ≥110mg/dl on two occasions, 24 hours apart. These patients underwent an oral glucose tolerance test. Blood sugar levels were tested at 0 and 2 hours. Based on the findings, patients were classified to have impaired glucose tolerance if levels were between 140-200mg/dl and frank diabetes if the levels were ≥ 200mg/dl. These findings were further assessed according to age, gender, Body Mass Index (BMI) Child Turcott Pugh score and Ultrasonography findings.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

In our study all the statistical analysis was done using simple z-test and student t-test. The p-values were calculated and the results assessed accordingly.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Out of 100 patients, 78 were males and rest females. The mean age of the study group was 55.89±11.22 years. Mean BMI of males was higher than in females (21.98kg/m² v/s 20.13kg/m²). Maximum patients belonged to Child Turcott Pugh class C. Out of 100 patients,80 had cirrhosis on ultrasound. On doing Glucose Tolerance Test, 40 patients were found to have impaired glucose tolerance and one patient to be diabetic. The prevalence increased significantly as age increased and had significant relation with gender. On assessing according to BMI, there was not much significant relation but prevalence was significantly related to severity of disease.

Management of chronic hepatitis C virus infection in patients with end-stage renal disease: a review

Infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is highly prevalent in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, mainly in those on hemodialysis (HD). The seroprevalence of HCV in developing countries ranges between 7% and 40%. Risk factors for this infection in the CKD population include the number of blood transfusions, duration of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and prevalence of HCV in HD. Chronic HCV infection in patients with ESRD is associated with an increase in morbidity and mortality in the pre and post kidney transplant periods. The increase in mortality is directly associated with liver complications and an elevated cardiovascular risk in HCV-infected patients on hemodialysis. Antiviral treatment may improve the prognosis of patients with HCV, and standard interferon remains the cornerstone of treatment. Treatment of HCV in patients with CKD is complex, but achieving a sustained viral response may decrease the frequency of complications after transplantation. It appears that HCV-infected patients who remain on maintenance dialysis are at increased risk of death compared with HCV patients undergoing renal transplantation.

Hyperparathyroidism and new onset diabetes after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Secondary hyperparathyroidism persists after renal transplantation in a substantial number of patients. Primary hyperparathyroidism and secondary hyperparathyroidism are both associated with abnormalities in glucose metabolism, such as insufficient insulin release and glucose intolerance. The association of hyperparathyroidism and diabetes after renal transplantation has, as far as we know, not been studied. Our aim was to investigate whether hyperparathyroidism is associated with new-onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation (NODAT) during the first year posttransplantation.

STUDY DESIGN

In a retrospective study, we analyzed data on patient characteristics, treatment details, and parathyroid hormone (PTH) in 245 adult nondiabetic patients who underwent renal transplantation between January 2000 and June 2011.

RESULTS

The first year cumulative incidence of NODAT was 15%. The first serum PTH value after transplantation was above normal range in 74% of the patients. In multiple logistic regression analysis, PTH levels above twice normal range (>13.80 pmol/L) were significantly associated with NODAT (odds ratio [OR], 4.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-15.92; P = .03) compared with PTH within normal range (≤6.9 pmol/L). Age between 45 and 65 years (OR, 2.80; 95% CI, 1.07-7.36; P = .04) compared with age <45 years was also associated with NODAT.

CONCLUSION

We found a strong association between hyperparathyroidism and NODAT in the first year after renal transplantation. Both conditions are common and have a negative impact on graft and patient survivals. Our results should be confirmed in prospective studies.

The impact of cytomegalovirus infection on new-onset diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation: a review on current findings

CONTEXT

New onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation (NODAT) increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, rate of infections, graft rejection and graft loss as well as decreases patient and graft survival rates. There is a controversy surrounding the impact of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in the development of NODAT. This meta-analysis aims to identify the role of CMV infection leading to the development of NODAT in kidney recipient patients.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITIONS

We searched several electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Medline, Scopus, Trip Database and Google Scholar for studies that completely fulfill our criteria between January 1990 and January 2014 RESULTS: Seven studies with 1389 kidney transplant patients were included in this metaanalysis.The mean age of patients ranged from 42.8 to 48.8 years and males made up 53% to 75% of patients in the cohort studies. The incidence of NODAT varies from 14.3% to 27.1% in these studies. Overall adj OR was 1.94 [exp (0.66)] with a 95% CI of 1.26-2.98 [exp (0.23) and (1.09)]. There was no significant publication bias based on the Begg's and Egger's test (p value = 0.17 and 0.54, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that CMV infection is a risk factor for increasing incidence of NODAT. Thus, prophylaxis against CMV infection after kidney transplantation is strongly suggested. However, further clinical trials and cohorts are needed to confirm this association.

Anti-viral therapy in haemodialysed HCV patients: efficacy, tolerance and treatment strategy

BACKGROUND

In end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, hepatitis C virus (HCV) eradication improves patient and graft survival.

AIM

To determine optimal use of erythropoietin (EPO) and ribavirin, to compare ribavirin concentrations with those of HCV patients having normal renal function and to evaluate sustained virological response (SVR) in a prospective observatory of ESRD candidates for renal transplantation.

METHODS

Thirty-two naïve patients were treated with Peg-IFN-α2a and ribavirin. Two different schedules of ribavirin and EPO administration were used: starting ribavirin at 600mg per week and adapting EPO when haemoglobin (Hb) fell below 10g/dL (adaptive strategy) or starting ribavirin at 1000mg per week while increasing EPO from the start of treatment (preventive strategy).

RESULTS

Patients treated with the adaptive strategy had lower median Hb levels (9.6 vs. 10.9g/dL, P=0.02) and more frequent median Hb levels below 10g/dL (58 vs. 5%, P=0.0007) despite lower median ribavirin doses (105 vs. 142mg/day, P<0.0001) than patients treated with the preventive strategy. There was a trend for more frequent transfusion in patients treated with the adaptive strategy than in patients treated with preventive strategy (50 vs. 20%, P=0.08). Compared to patients with normal renal function, ESRD patients had lower ribavirin concentrations during the first month (0.81 vs. 1.7mg/L, P=0.007) and similar concentrations thereafter. SVR was reached in 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

Pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) and an adapted schedule of ribavirin are effective in ESRD patients. Increasing EPO from the start of treatment provides better haematological tolerance. The optimal dosage of ribavirin remains unresolved, in light of frequent side effects.

Association of metabolic syndrome with development of new-onset diabetes after transplantation

BACKGROUND

New-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) is a major posttransplant complication associated with lower allograft and recipient survival. Our objective was to determine whether metabolic syndrome pretransplant is independently associated with NODAT development.

METHODS

We recruited 640 consecutive incident nondiabetic renal transplant recipients from three academic centers between 1999 and 2004. NODAT was defined as the use of hypoglycemic medication, a random plasma glucose level more than 200 mg/dL, or two fasting glucose levels more than or equal to 126 mg/dL beyond 30 days posttransplant.

RESULTS

Metabolic syndrome was common pretransplant (57.2%). NODAT developed in 31.4% of recipients 1 year posttransplant. Participants with metabolic syndrome were more likely to develop NODAT compared with recipients without metabolic syndrome (34.4% vs. 27.4%, P=0.057). Recipients with increasing number of positive metabolic syndrome components were more likely to develop NODAT (metabolic syndrome score prevalence at 1 year: 0 components-0.0%, 1-24.2%, 2-29.3%, 3-31.0%, 4-34.8%, and 5-73.7%, P=0.001). After adjustment for demographics, age by decade (hazard ratio [HR] 1.34 [1.20-1.50], P<0.0001), African American race (HR 1.35 [1.01-1.82], P=0.043), cumulative prednisone dosage (HR 1.18 [1.07-1.30], P=0.001), and metabolic syndrome (HR 1.34 [1.00-1.79], P=0.047) were independent predictors of development of NODAT at 1 year posttransplant. In a multivariable analysis incorporating the individual metabolic syndrome components themselves as covariates, the only pretransplant metabolic syndrome component to remain an independent predictor of NODAT was low high-density lipoprotein (hazard ratio [HR] 1.37 [1.01-1.85], P=0.042).

CONCLUSIONS

Metabolic syndrome is an independent predictor for NODAT and is a possible target for intervention to prevent NODAT. Future studies to evaluate whether modification of metabolic syndrome factors pretransplant reduces NODAT development are needed.

Influence of preexisting hepatitis C virus antibody positivity in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Preexisting hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is implicated in diminished patient and graft survivals in renal transplant recipients. The impact of HCV infection on patient and graft survival in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantations is unclear. We evaluated the effect of preexisting HCV infection on patient and graft survival in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPKT) recipients in the United States.

METHODS

Using the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database as of March 2009, adult primary SPKT recipients transplanted from 1995 to 2008 were studied. We stratified recipients based on pretransplant HCV status as HCV positive (HCV+) or HCV negative (HCV-). Overall kidney graft, pancreas graft, and patient survival were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 10,809 adults received primary SPKT, of which 350 (3.2%) were HCV+. Less than 2% of the HCV+ recipients received organs from HCV+ donors. There were no significant differences in baseline donor and recipient characteristics between groups. Rates of acute kidney rejection at 1 year were similar: 22.9% for HCV+ and 23.0% for HCV- recipients (P=0.49). There was no difference in serum creatinine between groups up to 3 years. After controlling for confounding factors, HCV positivity was not associated with worsened overall kidney graft (hazard ratio [HR] 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61-1.03), pancreas graft (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.63-1.00), or patient survival (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.56-1.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Only 3.2% of SPKT recipients had preexisting HCV infection. Preexisting HCV infection had no significant impact on kidney graft, pancreas graft, or patient survival.

Association of hepatitis C and B virus infection with CKD in an endemic area in Taiwan: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections may lead to nephropathy. However, the association between different types of viral hepatitis and chronic kidney disease (CKD) is not well established.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

A large-scale community study with 54,966 adults in a Taiwanese county endemic for HBV and HCV infection.

PREDICTOR

HCV infection alone, HBV infection alone, HBV/HCV coinfection, and neither.

OUTCOMES

Proteinuria (urine protein, >or=1+), low (<60 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and CKD (proteinuria or eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2)).

MEASUREMENTS

HBV and HCV infection were defined as a seropositive test result for hepatitis B surface antigen and HCV antibody. Proteinuria was assessed using a repeated dipstick method. eGFR was computed using the 4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation.

RESULTS

Mean age of the study group was 60.8 years. Prevalences of HCV infection alone, HBV infection alone, HBV/HCV coinfection, and neither were 9.4%, 9.9%, 0.9%, and 79.8%, respectively. 2,994 (5.4%), 7,936 (14.5%), and 9,602 (17.5%) participants had proteinuria, low eGFR, and CKD, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that HCV infection alone (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.17-1.38), but not HBV infection alone (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.96-1.14) or HBV/HCV coinfection (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.87-1.45), was an independent risk factor for CKD. The prevalence of HCV seropositivity was higher in later CKD stages, changing from 8.5% in CKD stage 1 to 14.5% in CKD stages 4-5. Adjusted ORs for HCV infection alone were 1.14 (95% CI, 1.003-1.300) for proteinuria and 1.30 (95% CI, 1.20-1.42) for low eGFR.

LIMITATIONS

The definition of CKD status requires a 3-month duration of low eGFR or kidney damage; this was presumed, not documented, in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

HCV infection, but not HBV infection, was associated significantly with prevalence and disease severity of CKD in this HBV and HCV endemic area.

Hepatitis C and diabetes: the inevitable coincidence?

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and HCV infection are common conditions involving, respectively, at least 170 and 130 million people worldwide. However, the distribution of such cases does not overlap in the same age groups in different geographic areas. Following pioneering reports of increased prevalence of T2D in HCV-positive cirrhosis, interest concerning the relationship between HCV and T2D has escalated. HCV is able to induce insulin resistance (IR) directly and the role of specific viral genotypes responsible for such effect is disputed. IR has consistently been found to be closely linked to fibrosis in HCV infection, although also typically associated with T2D in prefibrotic stages. HCV infection could be associated with a reduced prevalence of metabolic syndrome owing to virus-associated reduction in BMI (reported in population but not clinical studies) and hypobetaliproteinemia. A three- to ten-fold increased risk of HCV infection was reported among diabetic patients in comparison with different control groups and a meta-analysis showed a 1.8-fold excess risk of T2D among HCV-positive compared with HBV-positive patients. Moreover, HCV positivity is associated with an increased risk of T2D in patients receiving liver or kidney transplantations. T2D and IR are independent predictors of a more rapid progression of liver fibrosis and impaired response to antiviral treatment in chronic hepatitis C. Patients with cirrhosis and T2D have an increased susceptibility to hepatic encephalopathy and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the beneficial effects of antiviral treatment on IR and T2D are controversial. Theoretically, glycemic control in chronic hepatitis C, and particularly in cirrhotic patients, could improve the prognosis and the response to antivirals, although the evidence for this is limited. Future studies should elucidate the relationship between insulin signaling, HCV and interferon signaling, entity of cardiovascular risk in patients with HCV infection, the potential role of 'metabolic' strategies added to antiviral treatment schedules, the impact of IR on liver failure, portal hypertension and HCC, particularly in patients managed in a transplant setting.

Hepatitis C virus infection in haemodialysis and kidney transplant patients

Chronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is an important global health problem. The prevalence of HCV is significantly higher in haemodialysis and kidney transplant patients, as compared to the general population. In spite of the relatively milder liver disease activity reported in HCV-infected haemodialysis patients, HCV infection adversely affects survival. Likewise, HCV has a detrimental effect on both patient and graft survival after kidney transplantation. However, patient survival is significantly better with kidney transplantation compared to remaining on dialysis; therefore, HCV infection alone should not be a contraindication to transplantation. Combination antiviral therapy with pegylated interferon-alpha and low-dose ribavirin is currently evolving in haemodialysis patients. Interferon-alpha (standard/pegylated) is relatively contraindicated after kidney transplantation because of an increased risk of allograft rejection. Therefore, antiviral treatment of transplant candidates while on dialysis remains the best option and may avoid the risk of HCV-associated liver and renal disease after transplantation. Large multi-centre clinical trials are required in HCV-infected haemodialysis and kidney transplant patients in order to define optimal therapeutic strategies before and after transplantation.

Seroprevalence of hepatitis C in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and non-diabetic on haemodialysis

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) has emerged as the commonest cause of end-stage renal disease. Haemodialysis (HD) treatment constitutes a high-risk environment for the transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV). The aim of this study was to establish a potential relationship between type 2 DM and HCV infection in HD patients. Of the 267 HD patients, 67 (25.1%) had type 2 DM and 200 (74.9%) were with diverse aetiology for end-stage renal disease. The serum markers of HCV infection were tested by a second-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test for antibodies and by qualitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction technique for viral RNA. The overall prevalence of anti-HCV antibodies and HCV RNA was found to be 12.7% (34/267) and 10.1% (27/267), respectively. Patients with type 2 DM were found to have a higher HCV prevalence compared with non-diabetic patients [20.8% (14/67) vs. 10% (20/200)] (p < 0.05). The mean period on dialysis of anti-HCV-positive patients with type 2 DM was shorter than that observed for anti-HCV-positive non-diabetic patients (43.9 +/- 9.8 months vs. 59.7 +/- 28.4 months) (p < 0.05). This study has shown that although the period on dialysis of diabetic patients are shorter than non-diabetic patients, the prevalence of HCV in HD patients with type 2 DM is higher than that detected in non-diabetic HD patients.