Review article: recent advances in the management of bleeding gastric varices

Endoscopic Glue Injection Versus Endoscopic Human Thrombin Injection for Bleeding Gastric Varices-A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Acute gastric variceal bleeding (AGVB) is a potentially fatal consequence of portal hypertension, accounting for 10% to 30% of all variceal bleeding. Although endoscopic cyanoacrylate glue injection is a common treatment for acute hemostasis, it has been linked to significant side effects. In the treatment of AGVB, there is limited evidence of the efficacy and relative safety of endoscopic human thrombin injection over glue injection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 52 AGVB patients were randomized to receive either thrombin injection (25 patients) or glue injection (27 patients). The primary outcome was the incidence of any glue or thrombin injection-related post-therapy complications. Initial hemostasis, rebleeding, and mortality were all secondary end goals.

RESULTS

Both groups had comparable baseline data. Hemostasis of active bleeding at endoscopy was 100.0% (10/10) in the thrombin group and 87.5% (7/8) in the glue group ( P =0.44). Treatment failure after 5 days occurred in 2 patients (6.1%) in the glue group compared with none in the thrombin group ( P =0.165). Between 6 and 42 days after index bleeding, rebleeding occurred in 4 patients in the thrombin group compared with 6 patients in the glue group ( P =0.728). In the thrombin group, none of the patients had post-treatment ulcers on gastric varices compared with 14.81% (4/27) that occurred in the glue group ( P =0.045), a statistically significant observation. Overall, complications occurred in 4 (20%) and 11 (40.7%) patients in the thrombin and glue groups, respectively ( P =0.105). Two patients in the glue group died.

CONCLUSION

To achieve successful AGVB hemostasis, endoscopic thrombin injection has been proven efficacious. However, glue injection may be linked to a higher rate of rebleeding and post-therapy gastric variceal ulceration compared with thrombin.

Left-sided portal hypertension: Update and proposition of management algorithm

Left-sided or segmental portal hypertension (SPHT) is a rare entity, most often associated with pancreatic disease or antecedent pancreatic surgery. The starting point is splenic vein obstruction secondary to local inflammation or, less often, extrinsic compression. SPHT leads to splenomegaly and development of collateral porto-systemic venous circulation. SPHT should be suspected in patients with pancreatic history who present with episodic upper gastrointestinal bleeding and splenomegaly with normal liver function tests. The most common clinical presentation is major upper gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to rupture of esophageal and/or gastric varices. At the present time, there are no management recommendations for SPHT, particularly when the patient is asymptomatic. In patients with upper gastro-intestinal bleeding, hemostasis can be obtained either by medical or interventional means according to patient status and available resources. For symptomatic patients, splenectomy is the reference treatment. Recently, less invasive, radiologic procedures, such as splenic artery embolization, have been developed as an alternative to surgery. Additionally, sonography-guided endoscopic hemostasis can also be envisioned, leading to the diagnosis and treatment of the lesion by elastic band ligation or by glue injection into the varices during the same procedure. The goal of this article is to describe the pathophysiological mechanisms behind SPHT and its clinical manifestations and treatment, based on a review of the literature. Because of the absence of recommendations for the management of SPHT, we propose a decisional algorithm for the management of SPHT based on the literature.

Difference between type 2 gastroesophageal varices and isolated fundic varices in clinical profiles and portosystemic collaterals

BACKGROUND

There is significant heterogeneity between gastroesophageal varices (GOV2) and isolated gastric varices (IGV1). The data on the difference between GOV2 and IGV1 are limited.

AIM

To determine the etiology, clinical profiles, endoscopic findings, imaging signs, portosystemic collaterals in patients with GOV2 and IGV1.

METHODS

Medical records of 252 patients with gastric fundal varices were retrospectively collected, and computed tomography images were analyzed.

RESULTS

Significant differences in routine blood examination, Child–Pugh classification and MELD scores were found between GOV2 and IGV1. The incidence of peptic ulcers in patients with IGV1 (26.55%) was higher than that of GOV2 (11.01%), while portal hypertensive gastropathy was more commonly found in patients with GOV2 (22.02%) than in those with IGV1 (3.54%). Typical radiological signs of cirrhotic liver were more commonly observed in patients with GOV2 than in those with IGV1. In patients with GOV2, the main afferent vessels were via the left gastric vein (LGV) (97.94%) and short gastric vein (SGV) (39.18%). In patients with IGV1, the main afferent vessels were via the LGV (75.61%), SGV (63.41%) and posterior gastric vein (PGV) (43.90%). In IGV1 patients with pancreatic diseases, spleno-gastromental-superior mesenteric shunt (48.15%) was a major collateral vessel. In patients with fundic varices, the sizes of gastric/esophageal varices were positively correlated with afferent vessels (LGVs and PGVs) and efferent vessels (gastrorenal shunts). The size of the esophageal varices was negatively correlated with gastrorenal shunts in GOV2 patients.

CONCLUSION

Significant heterogeneity in the etiology and vascular changes between GOV2 and IGV1 is useful in making therapeutic decisions.

Endoscopic Treatment of Gastric and Ectopic Varices

Gastric variceal bleeding has a high mortality. Endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection is the standard therapy; however, rebleeding and unexpected adverse events, such as injection sites ulcers and distal glue embolisms, are pitfalls of this therapy. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided endovascular therapies offer a safer and more practical alternative for the treatment of gastric varices. EUS-guided combined therapy with coiling and cyanoacrylate injection is the most promising alternative with high obliteration rates and fewer adverse events reported. The authors reviewed the latest available data for all endoscopic therapies proposed for the management of gastric varices in patients with chronic liver disease.

Management of portal hypertensive upper gastrointestinal bleeding: Report of the Coorg Consensus workshop of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology Task Force on Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Portal hypertensive bleeding is a major complication of portal hypertension (PHT) with high morbidity and mortality. A lot of advances have been made in our understanding of screening, risk stratification, and management strategies for portal hypertensive bleeding including acute variceal bleeding leading to improved overall outcomes in patients with PHT. A number of guidelines on variceal bleeding have been published by various societies in the past few years. The Indian Society of Gastroenterology (ISG) Task Force on Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding (UGIB) felt that it was necessary to bring out a standard practice guidance document for the use of Indian health care providers especially physicians, gastroenterologists, and hepatologists. For this purpose, an expert group meeting was convened by the ISG Task Force to deliberate on this matter and write a consensus guidance document for Indian practice. The delegates including gastroenterologists, hepatologists, radiologists, and surgeons from different parts of the country participated in the consensus development meeting at Coorg in 2018. A core group was constituted which reviewed all published literature on portal hypertensive UGIB with special reference to the Indian scenario and prepared unambiguous statements on different aspects for voting and consensus in the whole group. This consensus was produced through a modified Delphi process and reflects our current understanding and recommendations for the diagnosis and management of portal hypertensive UGIB in Indians. Intended for use by the health care providers especially gastroenterologists and hepatologists, these consensus statements provide an evidence-based approach to risk stratification, diagnosis, and management of patients with portal hypertensive bleeding.

Treatment of Acute Variceal Bleeding in 2021-When to Use Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunts?

Variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis is associated with high mortality if not adequately managed. Treatment of acute variceal bleeding with adequate resuscitation maneuvers, restrictive transfusion policy, antibiotic prophylaxis, pharmacologic therapy, and endoscopic therapy is highly effective at controlling bleeding and preventing death. There is a subgroup of high-risk cirrhotic patients in whom this strategy fails, however, and who have a high-mortality rate. Placing a preemptive transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in these high-risk patients, as soon as possible after admission, to achieve early control of bleeding has proved not only to control bleeding but also to improve survival.

Bleeding Isolated Gastric Varices as a Rare Presentation of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor: Case Report and Literature Review

Isolated gastric varices (IGV) are gastric varices in the absence of esophageal varices. IGV is one of the rare causes of gastrointestinal bleeding and an uncommon complication of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET). The gold standard diagnostic tool of varices is esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). IGV tend to bleed with lesser portal pressure compared to esophageal varices. Initial treatment is similar to the gastroesophageal varices. The intervention options include endoscopic, radiological, and surgical approach.

Comparison of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for treatment of variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis with or without spontaneous portosystemic shunt

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an effective intervention for portal hypertensive complications in cirrhosis. Spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSSs) may increase the risk of post-TIPS complications and mortality. This study was done to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TIPS for treating variceal bleeding between patients with and without SPSSs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The clinical data of 467 consecutive patients with cirrhosis who received TIPS for variceal bleeding from January 2012 to January 2018 were screened. A total of 33 patients with coexisting SPSSs were included as the SPSS group, and 33 patients without SPSSs were randomly selected as control. The procedure-related complications and long-term outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Both groups were successfully treated with TIPS. SPSSs were antegradely embolized before TIPS placement. In terms of safety, one patient in the SPSS group experienced an asymptomatic pulmonary embolism, and another patient experienced serious gastric ulcer bleeding. Overall, 23 (70.0%) patients in the SPSS group and 16 (51.5%) patients in the control group experienced different mild complications (P=0.131). During a median follow-up of more than 2 years, the rebleeding rates (7.1 vs. 3.7% at 1 year, P=0.508), overt hepatic encephalopathy occurrence rates (34.4 vs. 39.4% at 2 years, P=0.685), and orthotopic liver transplantation-free survival rates (73.2 vs. 70.7% at 2 years, P=0.557) were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

TIPS combined with antegrade embolization is safe, effective, and feasible for patients with SPSSs, with safety and long-term outcomes comparable to patients without SPSSs.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Angiotherapy for Gastric Varices: A Single Center Experience

There are limited efficacious therapeutic options for management of gastric variceal bleeding. Treatment modalities include transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, surgical shunts, and endoscopic interventions, including the recent advancement of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided coiling. We present a case series of 10 patients with portal hypertension (7 with liver cirrhosis and 3 without cirrhosis), complicated by gastric varices (GV) with bleeding. All cases were treated successfully with EUS-guided coiling leading to variceal eradication. There were 10 occurrences of minimal self-limited bleeding at the puncture site during the procedure, and only one occurrence of major bleeding that necessitated cyanoacrylate glue injection for homeostasis. There were no other adverse events within a mean follow-up time of 9.7 months (range, 1-28 months). Conclusion: In our series, EUS-guided angiotherapy was effective for GV eradication with a high safety profile.

A review article on gastric varices with focus on the emerging role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided angiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Gastric varices (GV) manifest in almost one-fifth of the patients with portal hypertension. Although primary pharmacological prevention of esophageal varices has been identified, there are limited therapeutic options that are optimal for GV bleeding. Recently, the use of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided angiotherapy [cyanoacrylate (CA) and coils] was introduced for the treatment of GV. Although CA injection is the recommended first-line therapeutic modality, it is associated with systemic, life-threatening embolization as well as technical instrumental challenges. Recently, EUS-guided coiling for GV was used with high safety profile.

METHODS

This is a review of the current literature on the treatment of GV, focusing on the role of EUS-guided angiotherapy in the treatment of GV. We performed a Medline/PubMed search, and 37 relevant studies were extracted and examined.

RESULTS

EUS-guided angiotherapy has shown a consistent favorable result among the several reports throughout the literature, with better safety and efficacy profile toward EUS-guided coiling; however, a combination treatment with EUS-guided coiling followed by glue injection has shown as well to reduce the embolization adverse events associated with glue injection.

CONCLUSION

EUS-guided angiotherapy and specifically EUS-guided coiling is an emerging promising technique and should be considered as a first-line therapeutic option for bleeding GV.

Efficacy and safety of balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration of gastric varices with lauromacrogol foam sclerotherapy: initial experience

PURPOSE

Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) is a widely-accepted treatment for gastric varices (GVs). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BRTO with lauromacrogol foam sclerotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between May 2014 and June 2015, 32 patients were treated with lauromacrogol foam. Lauromacrogol foam was made using a combination of agents, with a 2:1:1 ratio of room air: lauromacrogol: contrast media. Patients were followed up using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and endoscopy.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in 31 of 32 patients (96.9%). Portal vein thrombosis occurred in two patients and resolved spontaneously. No other major complications were observed. The overall mean dose of lauromacrogol used was 12.4 mL (range, 8-20 mL). Complete obliteration of GVs was confirmed in all 31 patients (100%) on follow-up CT. Seven of the 31 patients (22.6%) experienced worsening of esophageal varices. Rupture of esophageal varices occurred in three patients and was treated successfully with band ligation. Five patients (16.1%) experienced worsening of ascites and responded well to diuretic therapy.

CONCLUSION

BRTO utilizing lauromacrogol foam appears to be a safe and useful treatment option in patients with GVs in the short term.

Evaluation and management of variceal bleeding

Acute variceal bleeding is one of the most fatal complications of cirrhosis and is responsible for about one-third of cirrhosis-related deaths. Therefore, every effort should be made to emergently resuscitate the patients, start pharmacotherapy as soon as possible and do endoscopic therapy in a timely manner. Despite the recent advances in treatment, mortality rate is still high. We provide a comprehensive review of evaluation and management of variceal bleeding.

Gastric Varices in Cirrhosis vs. Extrahepatic Portal Venous Obstruction and Response to Endoscopic N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate Injection

BACKGROUND

Gastric varices (GV) are found in patients with portal hypertension. Incidence of bleeding from GV is relatively low, but is severe, and associated with higher mortality.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To compare the types of GV in cirrhosis vs. extrahepatic portal venous obstruction (EHPVO) and the results of endoscopic N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (NBC, glue) injection.

METHODS

Four hundred and fifty-four patients undergone glue injection of GV for primary prophylaxis or control of bleeding for first episode of bleeding from GV between August 2010 and August 2015 were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 454 patients, 64% (n = 292) were cirrhotics and 36% (n = 162) had EHPVO. Types of GV were GOV1 in 16.4% (n = 48) of cirrhotics vs. 7.4% (n = 12) of EHPVO, GOV2 in 76.7% (n = 224) of cirrhotics vs. 53.1% (n = 86) of EHPVO, Isolated gastric Varices (IGV1) in 39.5% (n = 64) of patients with EHPVO vs. 6.8% (n = 20) cirrhotics. The patients were treated with NBC injections. The mean volume of glue injected was 2.89 ± 1.59 ml over a median of 1 session (range: 1-7). The total volume of glue required was lower in cirrhotics (2.44 ± 1.17 ml vs. 3.69 ± 1.91 ml, P < 0.05) than in EHPVO patients. One hundred and seventeen (40.1%) of cirrhotics required >1 sessions of glue injection as compared to 102 (63%) of EHPVO patients. Over mean follow up of 14.7 ± 6.46 months, rebleeding (10% vs. 13%) was similar in patients with cirrhosis and EHPVO and mortality (15.4% vs. 2.5%) was higher in cirrhotics than EHPVO.

CONCLUSION

In patients with bleeding from GV, GOV2 are more common in cirrhotics and IGV1 in patients with EHPVO. Patients with EHPVO required higher total volume of glue and more glue sessions for GV obturation.

Recent advances in the management of variceal bleeding

Acute haemorrhage from ruptured gastroesophageal varices is perhaps the most serious consequence of uncontrolled portal hypertension in cirrhotic patients. It represents a medical emergency and is associated with a high morbidity and mortality. In those who survive the initial bleeding event, the risks of further bleeding and other decompensated events remain high. The past 30 years have seen a slow evolution of management strategies that have greatly improved the chances of surviving a variceal haemorrhage. Liver cirrhosis is a multi-staged pathological process and we are moving away from a one-size-fits-all therapeutic approach. Instead there is an increasing recognition that a more nuanced approach will yield optimal survival for patients. This approach seeks to risk stratify patients according to their disease stage. The exact type and timing of treatment offered can then be varied to suit individual patients. At the same time, the toolbox of available therapy is expanding and there is a continual stream of emerging evidence to support the use of endoscopic and pharmacological therapies. In this review, we present a summary of the treatment options for a variety of different clinical scenarios and for when there is failure to control bleeding. We have conducted a detailed literature review and presented up-to-date evidence from either primary randomized-controlled trials or meta-analyses that support current treatment algorithms.

Endoscopic tissue adhesive injection for treatment of gastric variceal bleeding

Endoscopy is an important means for the prevention and treatment of gastric variceal bleeding. With definite curative effects and mild side effects, endoscopic tissue adhesive injection has become a preferred first-line treatment for gastric variceal hemorrhage and is now widely used in clinical practice. However, it is still controversial regarding surgical technique, long-term efficacy, risk of complications, and the effect of secondary prevention of gastric variceal bleeding. This article makes a summary of the above points of dispute.

BRTO assisted endoscopic Histoacryl injection in treating gastric varices with gastrorenal shunt

AIMS

We evaluated the feasibility, efficacy and safety of a novel technique of balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) assisted endoscopic Histoacryl (N-buthyl-2-cyanoacrylate) injection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total with 11 patients were enrolled and analyzed in this single center, open-label, prospective study. Patients with high-risk gastric varices (defined as fundal varices, large GV (>5 mm), presence of a red spot, and Child-Pugh score C) and concurrent gastrorenal shunt underwent endoscopic Histoacryl injection while the gastrorenal shunt was temporarily occluded with an occlusion balloon. Feasibility, hemostatic effect, intra- and postoperative complications, and varices recurrence were evaluated.

RESULTS

All procedures were successfully done per protocol. Except for one patient who underwent rescue Histoacryl injection due to residual varices, single therapy was sufficient to eliminate gastric varices in ten patients. Intra-operative hemorrhage occurred in one case and was stopped after additional Histoacryl injection. One patient was confirmed to have treatment-related fungemia. No death or major complications occurred, including ectopic embolism, worsening of hepatic and renal function, etc. No recurrence of the varices was found during a median follow-up time (mean ± SD) of 228 ± 153 days.

CONCLUSIONS

BRTO assisted endoscopic Histoacryl injection is effective and safe for patients with high-risk gastric varices and concurrent gastrorenal shunt.

Advances in treatment of acute esophagogastric variceal bleeding

Acute esophagogastric variceal bleeding is one of life-threatening complications of portal hypertension and the leading cause of death in patients with cirrhosis. How to effectively control bleeding is an important clinical subject, and specific measures include drug therapy, endoscopic therapy, and radiological interventional therapy. This review summarizes the current advances in the treatment of acute esophagogastric variceal bleeding.

Randomized trials of endoscopic therapy and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt versus portacaval shunt for emergency and elective treatment of bleeding gastric varices in cirrhosis

IMPORTANCE

Bleeding esophageal varices has been studied extensively, but bleeding gastric varices (BGV) has received much less investigation. However, BGV has been reported in ≤ 30% of patients with acute variceal bleeding. In our studies of 1,836 bleeding cirrhotics, 12.7% were bleeding from gastric varices. BGV mortality rate of 45-55% has been reported. The BGV literature has mainly involved retrospective case reports, often with short-term follow-up.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to describe the results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial (RCT) in unselected, consecutive patients with BGV comparing endoscopic therapy (ET) with portacaval shunt (PCS; n = 518), and later comparing emergency transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with emergency portacaval shunt (EPCS; n = 70).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Initially, our RCT involved 518 patients with BGV comparing ET with direct PCS regarding control of bleeding, mortality rate, and disability. When entry of patients ended, the RCT was expanded to compare emergency TIPS with EPCS (n = 70). This RCT of BGV was separate from our other RCTs of bleeding esophageal varices.

INTERVENTIONS

Initially, ET was compared with PCS. In the second part of our RCT, emergency TIPS was compared with emergency PCS (EPCS).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcomes were survival, control of bleeding, portal-systemic encephalopathy (PSE), quality of life, and direct costs of care. In the RCT of ET versus PCS, 28 and 30%, respectively, were in Child class C. In the expanded RCT of TIPS versus EPCS, 40 and 41%, respectively, were in Child class C. Permanent control of BGV was achieved in 97-100% of patients treated by emergency or elective PCS, compared with 27-29% by ET. TIPS was even less effective, achieving long-term control of BGV in only 6%. Survival rates after PCS were greater at all time intervals and in all Child classes (P < .001). Repeated episodes of PSE occurred in 50% of TIPS patients, 16-17% treated by ET, and 8-11% treated by PCS. Shunt stenosis or occlusion occurred in 67% of TIPS patients, in contrast with 0-2% of PCS patients.

CONCLUSION

These results support the conclusion that PCS is uniformly effective, whereas ET and TIPS are not very effective.

Efficacy of combined balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration and simultaneous endoscopic injection sclerotherapy

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (B-RTO) performed using absolute ethanol with iodized oil (ET+LPD) and simultaneous endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) with cyanoacrylate (CA) for gastric varices (GVs).

METHODS

A total of 16 patients with endoscopically proven high-risk GVs treated using combined B-RTO with ET+LPD and EIS with CA between January 2007 and July 2012 were enrolled.

RESULTS

Twelve cases included GVs involving both the cardia and fundus, two cases included fundal varices and two cases included cardiac varices. In terms of the form of GVs, 10 cases involved F2 lesions and six cases involved F3 lesions. The flow vein was the left gastric vein in 13 cases and the posterior gastric vein in three cases. The drainage route was a splenorenal shunt in all cases. The average dose of ET+LPD was 12.0 mL, while that of CA was 2.45 mL. All complications were transient, and no major complications occurred after the procedures. None of the patients experienced bleeding or recurrence of gastric varices after the combined B-RTO and EIS procedures during an average follow-up period of 38.3 months.

CONCLUSION

Combined B-RTO with ET+LPD and simultaneous EIS with CA is considered to be an effective and safe procedure for treating GVs.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts and portal hypertension-related complications

Portal hypertension (PH) plays an important role in the natural history of cirrhosis, and is associated with several clinical consequences. The introduction of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) in the 1980s has been regarded as a major technical advance in the management of the PH-related complications. At present, polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stents are the preferred option over traditional bare metal stents. TIPS is currently indicated as a salvage therapy in patients with bleeding esophageal varices who fail standard treatment. Recently, applying TIPS early (within 72 h after admission) has been shown to be an effective and life-saving treatment in those with high-risk variceal bleeding. In addition, TIPS is recommended as the second-line treatment for secondary prophylaxis. For bleeding gastric varices, applying TIPS was able to achieve hemostasis in more than 90% of patients. More trials are needed to clarify the efficacy of TIPS compared with other treatment modalities, including cyanoacrylate injection and balloon retrograde transvenous obliteration of gastric varices. TIPS should also be considered in bleeding ectopic varices and refractory portal hypertensive gastropathy. In patients with refractory ascites, there is growing evidence that TIPS not only results in better control of ascites, but also improves long-term survival in appropriately selected candidates. In addition, TIPS is a promising treatment for refractory hepatic hydrothorax. However, the role of TIPS in the treatment of hepatorenal and hepatopulmonary syndrome is not well defined. The advantage of TIPS is offset by a risk of developing hepatic encephalopathy, the most relevant post-procedural complication. Emerging data are addressing the determination the optimal time and patient selection for TIPS placement aiming at improving long-term treatment outcome. This review is aimed at summarizing the published data regarding the application of TIPS in the management of complications related to PH.

Endoscopic treatment of gastric varices

Gastric varices (GV) are present in one in 5 patients with portal hypertension and variceal bleeding. GV bleeds tend to be more severe with higher mortality. High index of suspicion, early detection and proper locational diagnosis are important. An algorithmic approach to the management of GV bleeding prevents rebleeds and improves survival. Vasoactive drugs should be started with in 30 minutes (door to needle time) and early endotherapy be done. Cyanoacrylate injection in experienced hands achieves hemostasis in >90% patients. A repeat session is sometimes needed for complete obturation of GV. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and balloon retrograde transvenous obliteration are effective rescue options. Secondary prophylaxis of GV bleeding is done with beta-blocker and endotherapy.

Historical overview and review of current day treatment in the management of acute variceal haemorrhage

Variceal haemorrhage is one of the most devastating consequences of portal hypertension, with a 1-year mortality of 40%. With the passage of time, acute management strategies have developed with improved survival. The major historical treatment landmarks in the management of variceal haemorrhage can be divided into surgical, medical, endoscopic and radiological breakthroughs. We sought to provide a historical overview of the management of variceal haemorrhage and how treatment modalities over time have impacted on clinical outcomes. A PubMed search of the following terms: portal hypertension, variceal haemorrhage, gastric varices, oesophageal varices, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt was performed. To complement this, Google™ was searched with the aforementioned terms. Other relevant references were identified after review of the reference lists of articles. The review of therapeutic advances was conducted divided into pre-1970s, 1970/80s, 1990s, 2000-2010 and post-2010. Also, a summary and review on the pathophysiology of portal hypertension and clinical outcomes in variceal haemorrhage was performed. Aided by the development of endoscopic therapies, medication and improved radiological interventions; the management of variceal haemorrhage has changed over recent decades with improved survival from an often-terminating event in recent past.

Comparison of scoring systems and outcome of patients admitted to a liver intensive care unit of a tertiary referral centre with severe variceal bleeding

BACKGROUND

Acute variceal haemorrhage (AVH) is associated with significant mortality.

AIMS

To determine outcome and factors associated with hospital mortality (HM) in patients with AVH admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) and to compare outcomes of patients requiring transfer to a tertiary ICU (transfer group, TG) to a local in-patient group (LG).

METHODS

A retrospective study of all adult patients (N = 177) admitted to ICU with AVH from 2000-2008 was performed.

RESULTS

Median age was 48 years (16-80). Male represented 58%. Median MELD score was 16 (6-39), SOFA score was 8 (6-11). HM was higher in patients who had severe liver disease or critical illness measured by MELD, SOFA, APACHE II scores and number of failed organs (NFO), P < 0.05. Patients with day-1 lactate ≥ 2 mmol/L had increased HM (P < 0.001). MELD score performed as well as APACHE II, SOFA and NFO (P < 0.001) in predicting HM (AUROC = 0.84, 0.81, 0.79 and 0.82, respectively P > 0.05 for pair wise comparisons). Re-bleeding was associated with increased HM (56.9% vs. 31.6%, P = 0.002). The TG (n = 124) had less severe liver disease and critical illness and consequently had lower HM than local patients (32% vs. 57%, P = 0.002). TG patients with ≥2 endoscopies prior to transfer had increased 6-week mortality (P = 0.03). Time from bleeding to transfer ≥3 days was associated with re-bleeding (OR = 2.290, P = 0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

MELD score was comparable to ICU prognostic models in predicting mortality. Blood lactate was also predictive of hospital mortality. Delays in referrals and repeated endoscopy were associated with increased re-bleeding and mortality in this group.

Multidetector CT anatomy of drainage routes of gastric varices: a pictorial review

Most gastric varices arise at hepatofugal collateral pathways and drain into the systemic vein through one or both of two different types of portosystemic collateral drainage systems: the gastroesophageal (azygous) venous system and the gastrophrenic venous system. The gastroesophageal venous system consists of gastric varices contiguous with esophageal varices, paraesophageal varices, and the azygos vein, which terminates into the superior vena cava. Gastric varices draining through the gastroesophageal venous system can be treated with endoscopic techniques or creation of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. The gastrophrenic venous system consists of the gastric varices and the left inferior phrenic vein (IPV), which terminates into the left renal vein or the inferior vena cava. The left IPV has abundant anastomoses with peridiaphragmatic and retroperitoneal veins, and these anastomoses can function as drainage pathways from gastric varices. Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration is a preferred treatment option for this type of gastric varix. Occasionally, gastric varices can form at the hepatopetal collateral pathway that develops secondary to localized portal hypertension caused by splenic vein occlusion. Splenectomy is often required for the treatment of this type of gastric varix. Multidetector computed tomography permits comprehensive evaluation of these venous drainage systems. Familiarity with and assessment of these draining routes of gastric varices are important for selecting treatment options and interventional techniques.

Laparoscopic splenectomy plus preoperative endoscopic variceal ligation versus splenectomy with pericardial devascularization (Hassab's operation) for control of severe varices due to portal hypertension

BACKGROUND

Our research was conducted to introduce a new, compound surgical method for laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) with preoperative endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) and compare the new method's efficiency with that of Hassab's operation in patients with severe esophageal varices due to portal hypertension.

METHODS

Between March 2009 and March 2012, 47 patients with liver cirrhosis, portal hypertension, and severe esophageal varices were retrospectively analyzed. Of these patients, 19 received the combined preoperative EVL and LS (minimally invasive surgery, MIS group), and 28 patients received splenectomy with pericardial devascularization (Hassab's operation, H group).

RESULTS

Before surgery, there were no differences in the patient characteristics of the two groups. There were no significant differences in operating time, but significantly less intraoperative blood loss and shorter postoperative hospital stay were found in the MIS group compared with the H group. The mean follow-up periods of the MIS and H groups were 12.1 and 13.6 months, respectively. No deaths were documented during the follow-up period. Generally, hematological parameters and liver function variables eventually revealed considerable improvement in both groups. In the MIS group, the patients with varices improved significantly from severe to mild, and in some cases, the varices disappeared after treatment. Three patients in the H group suffered rebleeding and were treated with repeated EVL. No bleeding or rebleeding occurred in the MIS group.

CONCLUSIONS

The final results suggest that LS with preoperative EVL provides a restorative efficacy equivalent to that of Hassab's operation. Based on the recurrence rate and the rebleeding rate of severe esophageal varices, our surgical strategy (EVL and LS) is a safe and minimally invasive technique that appears satisfactory in comparison to other open procedures.

Nodular regenerative hyperplasia related portal hypertension in a patient with hypogammaglobulinaemia

Nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) of liver is a relatively rare liver disorder, but a frequent cause of noncirrhotic portal hypertension. We present a lady with common variable immune deficiency who presented with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and deranged liver function tests but preserved synthetic function. Upper gastrointestinal endoscope showed bleeding gastric varices and non-bleeding oesophageal varices. Although her oesophageal varices were eradicated by repeated endoscopic band ligation, the gastric varices failed to resolve after repeated endoscopic histocryl injection and she eventually needed transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement. Liver biopsy showed NRH. We review the association of hypogammaglobinaemia and NRH and discuss the appropriate management of portal hypertension in NRH.

Trashepatic left gastric vein embolization in the treatment of recurrent hemorrhaging in patients with schistosomiasis previously submitted to non-derivative surgery

CONTEXT

Non-derivative surgical techniques are the treatment of choice for the control of upper digestive tract hemorrhages after schistosomotic portal hypertension. However, recurrent hemorrhaging due to gastroesophagic varices is frequent.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcome of treatment based on embolization of the left gastric vein to control the reoccurrence of hemorrhages caused by gastroesophagic varices in patients with schistosomiasis previously submitted to non-derivative surgery.

METHODS

Rates of reoccurrence of hemorrhages and the qualitative and quantitative reduction of gastroesophagic varices in patients undergoing transhepatic embolization of the left gastric vein between December 1999 and January 2009 were studied based on medical charts and follow-up reports.

RESULTS

Seven patients with a mean age of 39.3 years underwent percutaneous transhepatic embolization of the left gastric vein. The mean time between azigoportal disconnections employed in combination with splenectomy and the percutaneous approach was 8.4 ± 7.3 years, and the number of episodes of digestive hemorrhaging ranged from 1 to 7 years. No episodes of reoccurrence of hemorrhaging were found during a follow-up period which ranged from 6 months to 7 years. Endoscopic postembolization studies revealed reductions in gastroesophagic varices in all patients compared to preembolization endoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous transhepatic embolization of the left gastric vein in patients with schistosomiasis previously submitted to surgery resulted in a decrease in gastroesophagic varices and was shown to be effective in controlling hemorrhage reoccurrence.

Treatment of isolated gastric varices by balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration using lauromacrogol: An analysis of 23 cases

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lauromacrogol in treating isolated gastric varices by balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO).

METHODS: The clinical data for 23 patients who were diagnosed with isolated gastric varices with gastrorenal shunt and treated by BRTO using lauromacrogol from November 2009 to September 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical efficacy, safety and complications of this procedure were evaluated.

RESULTS: The procedure was successful in 21 cases. Hypotension and sinus bradycardia were observed intraoperatively in three cases and disappeared when the balloon was withdrawn. No complications such as ascites and hepatorenal function exacerbation occurred after the operation. Endoscopic examination at 3 mo after the procedure showed that varices disappeared in 13 cases, remarkably decreased in size in 6 cases, and had no significant changes in 2 cases. During 3 to 18 mo of follow-up, no bleeding was observed.

CONCLUSION: BRTO using lauromacrogol is effective and safe in treating isolated gastric varices with gastrorenal shunt.

Gastric Varices in Cirrhosis versus Extrahepatic Portal Venous Obstruction and Response to Endoscopic N-Butyl-2-cyanoacrylate Injection

BACKGROUND

Gastric varices are found in patients with portal hypertension. Incidence of bleeding from gastric varices is relatively low, but tends to be more severe, and is associated with higher mortality than esophageal variceal bleeding.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To compare the prevalence and types of gastric varices in cirrhosis versus extrahepatic portal venous obstruction (EHPVO) and the results of endoscopic N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (NBC, glue) injection.

METHODS

Eighty six patients presenting with bleeding from gastric varices between August 2010 and August 2011 were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 86 patients, 65% (n = 56) were cirrhotics and 35% (n = 30) had EHPVO. Distribution of types of gastric varices showed GOV1 in 14% (n = 8) of cirrhotics vs. 7% (n = 2) of EHPVO, GOV2 in 80% (n = 45) of cirrhotics vs. 53% (n = 16) of EHPVO, IGV1 in 40% (n = 12) of patients with EHPVO vs. 4% (n = 2) cirrhotics. The patients were treated with NBC injections. The mean volume of glue injected was 3.7 ± 2.58 ml over a median of 1 session (range: 1-8). The total volume of glue required was lower in cirrhotics (3.2 ± 2 ml vs. 4.7 ± 3.1 ml, p < 0.05) than in EHPVO patients. Twenty (36%) of cirrhotics required >1 sessions of glue injection as compared to 17 (57%) of EHPVO patients. Over mean follow up of 12 months, rebleeding (9% vs. 10%) and mortality (11% vs. 3%) were similar in patients with cirrhosis and EHPVO.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with bleeding from gastric varices, GOV2 is more common in cirrhotics and IGV1 in patients with EHPVO. Patients with EHPVO required higher total volume of glue and more glue sessions for gastric varix obturation.

Treatment of rare gastric variceal bleeding in acute pancreatitis using embolization of the splenic artery combined with short gastric vein

In the acute stage of pancreatitis, sinistral portal hypertension is a rare reason for gastric variceal bleeding. Here we report a 20-year-old female patient with massive upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage 7 days after an episode of severe acute pancreatitis. Computed tomography showed gastric varices caused by splenic venous thrombosis. Emergency endoscopic examination was performed, however tissue adhesive utilized to restrain the bleeding was not successful. Although interventional therapy was controversial to treat the gastric variceal hemorrhage resulting from sinistral portal hypertension, the bleeding was successfully treated by embolization of the splenic artery combined with short gastric vein. Two weeks after the interventional the patient was discharged from our hospital without recurrence of bleeding. Embolization of the splenic artery combined with short gastric vein proved to be an effective emergency therapeutic method for gastric variceal bleeding caused by sinistral portal hypertension in the acute stage of pancreatitis.

Gastric varices: is there a role for endoscopic cyanoacrylates, or are we entering the BRTO era?

Bleeding from portal hypertension-related gastric varices arising in the cardiofundal region of the stomach presents a challenge due to the unique underlying vascular anatomy which is sometimes underappreciated in endoscopic classification schemes. They often have dominant tributaries from the splenic vein or splenic hilum and terminate in the left renal vein (spontaneous splenorenal or gastrorenal shunts). This may limit the applicability of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), because of the shunt's distance from the hilum of the liver. Endoscopically, the presence of a large systemic outflow track also may influence the performance of different cyanoacrylates. However, this anatomy allows an alternative approach, balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO), which accesses the varix via the outflow pathway. Definitive comparisons between TIPS, endoscopic cyanoacrylate, and BRTO will be challenging because the incidence of this type of varix is insufficient for large trials. Here, I provide a perspective based on existing literature, 15 years of experience with various cyanoacrylates, and 4 years of experience with BRTO.

The Spanish Pancreatic Club's recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic pancreatitis: part 2 (treatment)

Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a complex disease with a wide range of clinical manifestations. This range comprises from asymptomatic patients to patients with disabling symptoms or complications. The management of CP is frequently different between geographic areas and even medical centers. This is due to the paucity of high quality studies and clinical practice guidelines regarding its diagnosis and treatment. The aim of the Spanish Pancreatic Club was to give current evidence-based recommendations for the management of CP. Two coordinators chose a multidisciplinary panel of 24 experts on this disease. These experts were selected according to clinical and research experience in CP. A list of questions was made and two experts reviewed each question. A draft was later produced and discussed with the entire panel of experts in a face-to-face meeting. The level of evidence was based on the ratings given by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. In the second part of the consensus, recommendations were given regarding the management of pain, pseudocysts, duodenal and biliary stenosis, pancreatic fistula and ascites, left portal hypertension, diabetes mellitus, exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, and nutritional support in CP.

Successful treatment of early gastric cancer adjacent to a fundal varix by endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic cyanoacrylate therapy

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was developed for the en bloc resection of large early gastrointestinal neoplasms. A disadvantage of ESD is its technical difficulty, which requires advanced skills and is associated with a higher rate of complications. Endoscopic variceal obturation (EVO) using cyanoacrylate has emerged as the initial treatment of choice for acute gastric variceal bleeding. This procedure achieves hemostasis in 90% of cases. A 52-year-old patient with Child A alcoholic liver cirrhosis presented with early gastric cancer in the cardia and type 1 isolated gastric varices in the fundus. The two lesions were so close together that treatment was not easy. The lesions were managed successfully with a combination of ESD and EVO using cyanoacrylate.

Variceal bleeding: consensus meeting report from the Brazilian Society of Hepatology

In the last decades, several improvements in the management of variceal bleeding have resulted in a significant decrease in morbidity and mortality of patients with cirrhosis and bleeding varices. Progress in the multidisciplinary approach to these patients has led to a better management of this disease by critical care physicians, hepatologists, gastroenterologists, endoscopists, radiologists and surgeons. In this respect, the Brazilian Society of Hepatology has, recently, sponsored a consensus meeting in order to draw evidence-based recommendations on the management of these difficult-to-treat subjects. An organizing committee comprised of four people was elected by the Governing Board and was responsible to invite 27 researchers from distinct regions of the country to make a systematic review of the subject and to present topics related to variceal bleeding, including prevention, diagnosis, management and treatment, according to evidence-based medicine. After the meeting, all participants met together for discussion of the topics and the elaboration of the aforementioned recommendations. The organizing committee was responsible for writing the final document. The meeting was held at Salvador, May 6th, 2009 and the present manuscript is the summary of the systematic review that was presented during the meeting, organized in topics, followed by the recommendations of the Brazilian Society of Hepatology.

Undiluted N-butyl cyanoacrylate is safe and effective for gastric variceal bleeding

BACKGROUND

Gastric variceal bleeding is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in patients with portal hypertension. N-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBC), mixed with lipiodol, has been shown to be effective in controlling bleeding, but is associated with the risk of distal embolization.

OBJECTIVE

To study the efficacy and safety of undiluted NBC in the management of gastric varices (GV).

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Single tertiary care center.

PATIENTS

170 consecutive patients with GV.

INTERVENTION

Standardized technique of undiluted NBC injection for management of GV.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Achievement of initial hemostasis, rate of rebleeding, procedure-related complications, and mortality.

RESULTS

GV were identified in 170 patients, 87 of whom were treated with 261 injections of undiluted NBC. Among 46 patients with active bleeding of GV, initial hemostasis was achieved in 84.8%. Rebleeding was seen in 23.4% patients over a mean follow-up of 16 months. No case of clinical distal embolization was seen. Large GV size, fundal location, and large esophageal variceal size were predictive of GV bleed. The mortality was 8.8% for all patients with GV; 10.3% for patients with GV treated with NBC, and 7.2% for those with GV not treated with NBC. Child-Pugh status was the only predictor of mortality.

LIMITATION

Only 1 intervention group.

CONCLUSION

Undiluted NBC is safe and effective in the management of gastric variceal bleeding.

Endoscopic cyanoacrylate versus transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for gastric variceal bleeding: a single-center U.S. analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Gastric variceal hemorrhage treatment remains a difficult issue for clinicians. There is controversy regarding whether first-line treatment should be endoscopic therapy with cyanoacrylate glue or placement of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). We compared these methods on the basis of rebleeding, survival, and complications. DESIGN, SETTING, PATIENTS, AND INTERVENTIONS: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of cirrhotic patients with gastric variceal hemorrhage treated with endoscopic cyanoacrylate therapy or TIPS placement at a single U.S. center from 1997 to 2007. The groups were compared for rebleeding at 72 hours, 3 months, and 1 year; survival rates at 3 months and 1 year; and acute and extended complications and morbidity.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

A total of 105 patients were included. There were no significant pretreatment differences between the 2 groups in age, sex, MELD (Model for End-Stage Liver Disease) score at the time of admission, or cause of liver disease. There were no significant differences in rebleeding at 72 hours, 3 months, and 1 year; survival at 3 months and 1 year; and aggregate long-term survival or acute complications. However, the TIPS group had a higher rate of long-term morbidity requiring hospitalization (41% with a TIPS and 1.6% in the cyanoacrylate arm, P < .0001).

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective and uncontrolled samples.

CONCLUSION

In patients with similar characteristics, cyanoacrylate therapy performed as well as a TIPS in controlling and preventing gastric variceal hemorrhage with no significant differences in survival. Patients receiving cyanoacrylate therapy experienced significantly less long-term morbidity related to therapy than patients who received a TIPS. Cyanoacrylate therapy appears to be safe and effective and compares favorably with TIPS therapy.

Management of Cirrhosis and Associated Complications

Liver cirrhosis is the encapsulation or replacement of injured tissue by collagen, resulting in end-stage liver disease and portal hypertension. The consequences of cirrhosis are impaired hepatocyte function, increase intrahepatic circulatory resistance, portal hypertension, and the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Complications include encephalopathy, coagulopathy, varices, ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, epatorenal syndrome, and hepatopulmonary syndrome. Managing patients with acute or chronic liver failure is challenging, and liver failure may have profound effects on other organ systems. Most therapies are directed at managing the complications and bridging patients to liver transplantation. The clinician must be aware of the pathologic presentations and the appropriate management, including pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies, goals and end points of therapy, and monitoring of therapy. This review focuses on the management of the complications directly associated with liver dysfunction (encephalopathy and coagulopathy) and portal hypertension (varices, ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hepatorenal syndrome, hepatopulmonary syndrome).

Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration of gastric varices using three-dimensional rotational angiography

The anatomy of the gastric veins and gastric varices is complex, and is difficult to understand even with digital subtraction angiography. In balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) of gastric varices, accurate assessment of the vascular anatomy is essential for successful treatment. Here, we report the case of a patient with gastric varices who was successfully treated with BRTO using three-dimensional rotational angiography.

Hemodynamic features of gastrorenal shunt: a Doppler study in cirrhotic patients with gastric fundal varices

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Little is known about the hemodynamics of gastrorenal shunt (GRS), a major drainage route of gastric fundal varices (FV), in patients with FV. The aim of this study was to clarify the hemodynamic features of GRS on Doppler sonography in relation to the grading and bleeding of FV.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study subjects consisted of 69 cirrhotic patients with FV. Diameter, flow velocity (FVe), and flow volume (FVo) of GRS were measured by Doppler ultrasound (US). The detection rate was compared to contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), and percutaneous transhepatic portography (PTP) was used in six patients without GRS on CECT.

RESULTS

The use of CECT detected GRS in 60 of 69 patients, and US, 58 of 69 patients. A false-negative result for detecting GRS on both CECT and US was found in one patient after PTP. The diameter, FVe, and FVo of GRS increased according to the endoscopic grade of FV: F1 (7.2+/-1.3 mm, 9.8+/-1.1 cm/s, 358.3+/-123.4 ml/min), F2 (9.9+/-3.3 mm, 12.8+/-5.1 cm/s, 701.7+/-411.3 ml/min), and F3 (11.8+/-2.4 mm, 17.9+/-8.3 cm/s, 1706.6+/-989.5 ml/min). A significant difference was seen between F1 and F3 (diameter, P=.0022; FVe, P=.0133; FVo, P=.0007) and between F2 and F3 (FVe, P=.0112; FVo, P<.0001). FVe of GRS was significantly higher in bleeders (16.7+/-8.1 cm/s) than in nonbleeders (12.2+/-5.4 cm/s, P=.017), whereas the diameter and FVo were not significant.

CONCLUSION

Hemodynamics of GRS on Doppler sonograms reflected the grading and bleeding of FV. Doppler US may be valuable as a noninvasive method to evaluate the severity of FV.

The therapeutic effect of cyanoacrylate on gastric variceal bleeding and factors related to clinical outcome

BACKGROUND

Cyanoacrylate has been recommended for the treatment of gastric variceal bleeding.

GOAL

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cyanoacrylate injection therapy in patients with gastric variceal bleeding, and to identify the factors predictive of failure, rebleeding, and survival after therapy.

STUDY

One hundred twenty-one patients with gastric variceal bleeding who received cyanoacrylate injections were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Treatment succeeded in 110 patients (90.9%). Rebleeding and mortality rate during 4-week were 13.2% and 11.6%. A stepwise logistic regression analysis indicated that only the Child-Pugh class was an independent predictive factor of treatment failure [Child-Pugh C vs. Child-Pugh A and B, odds ratio (OR), 5.0; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2-19.4; P=0.025]. The actuarial probability of a 4-week absence of rebleeding and survival after the initial therapy was 86.8% and 85.1%, respectively. A stepwise logistic regression analysis showed that a Child-Pugh class C and hepatocellular carcinoma were independent predictive factors for rebleeding (OR, 7.4; 95% CI, 2.0-27.0; P=0.003 and OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.0-11.1; P=0.05, respectively) and mortality (OR, 7.4; 95% CI, 2.0-27.0; P=0.003 and OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.0-11.1; P=0.05, respectively). Only 2 cases (2.7%) with serious complications, noted as cyanoacrylate embolisms, were observed. At 1-year follow up, the actuarial probability of remaining free of bleeding was 49.0% and hepatitis B virus infection was independent predictive factor of bleeding (OR, 5.3; 95% CI, 1.4-20.0; P=0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

In short-term follow-up, cyanoacrylate injection is an effective treatment method for gastric variceal bleeding and the Child-Pugh class was only independent predictive factor of treatment failure and the Child-Pugh class and the hepatocellular carcinoma were risk factors for rebleeding and survival. In long-term follow-up, the presence of hepatitis B infection was risk factor for rebleeding.

Treatment of acute variceal bleeding

The management of variceal bleeding remains a clinical challenge with a high mortality. Standardisation in supportive and new therapeutic treatments seems to have improved survival within the last 25 years. Although overall survival has improved in recent years, mortality is still closely related to failure to control initial bleeding or early re-bleeding occurring in up to 30-40% of patients. Initial procedures are to secure and protect the airway, and administer volume replacement to stabilize the patient. Treatment with vasoactive drugs should be started as soon as possible, since a reduction in portal pressure is associated with a better control of bleeding and may facilitate later endoscopic procedures. Vasopressin and its analogues Terlipressin and somatostatin and analogues are the two types of medicine, which has been evaluated. In meta-analysis, only Terlipressin have demonstrated effects on control of bleeding and on mortality. Somatostatin and its analogues improve control of bleeding, but show in meta-analysis no effects on mortality. Approximately 20% of patients with variceal bleeding will suffer from an infection, when they are hospitalized. Invasive procedures will further increase the risk of bacterial infections. Meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing antibiotics with placebo demonstrates that antibiotic prophylaxis improves survival with 9% (p<0.004). Quinolones or intravenous cephalosporins should be preferred. Early endoscopy should be performed in patients with major bleeding. Endoscopic therapy increases control of bleeding and decreases the risks of rebleeding and mortality. Ligation is probably more effective than sclerotherapy with fewer complications and should therefore be preferred, if possible. In case of gastric variceal bleeding, tissue adhesives should be used.

IN CONCLUSION

Improvements in resuscitation and prevention of complications have together with introduction of vasoactive drugs and refinement of endoscopic therapy majorily changed the prognosis of the patient presenting with variceal bleeding.