1
|
D'Amico F, Lusetti F, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Danese S. MMX mesalamine in ulcerative colitis: Major advantages towards classical mesalamine formulations. Dig Liver Dis 2024:S1590-8658(24)00713-8. [PMID: 38705783 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2024.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Revised: 01/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
Medical therapy is the cornerstone of ulcerative colitis (UC) management and aims to induce and maintain remission. In case of mild-to-moderate UC, mesalamine (5-ASA) is the first-line option. 5-ASA requires local release at the level of the inflamed mucosa to exert its therapeutic action. While rectal preparations are useful in distal colitis, in cases of UC of at least rectosigmoid extent, guidelines suggest the association of oral and rectal 5-ASA. Mesalamine with Multi Matrix System® technology (MMX mesalamine) is an oral, high-strength (1.2 g/tablet), once-daily formulation of 5-ASA, designed to provide delayed and prolonged release throughout the entire colon. Clinical trials demonstrated a strong efficacy in inducing and maintaining clinical and endoscopic remission in active mild-to-moderate UC. The efficacy is related to specific colonic drug-delivery, to its high-dosage and once-daily administration, thus improving patients' adherence and outcomes. The specific colonic-delivery is also associated with very low rates of systemic absorption and adverse events (AEs). With this comprehensive review we aimed to summarize current knowledge on MMX mesalamine in mild-to-moderate UC, in terms of clinical pharmacology, efficacy and safety, also compared to other 5-ASA products. In addition we provided an expert opinion on the topic, examining the implications on clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferdinando D'Amico
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Lusetti
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Gastroenterology Unit, Foundation Policlinico San Matteo IRCCS, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nancy University Hospital, F-54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France, Inserm, NGERE, University of Lorraine, F-54000 Nancy, France; INFINY Institute, Nancy University Hospital, F-54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France; FHU-CURE, Nancy University Hospital, F-54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France; Groupe Hospitalier privé Ambroise Paré - Hartmann, Paris IBD center, 92200 Neuilly sur Seine, France; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Silvio Danese
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
López-Posadas R, Bagley DC, Pardo-Pastor C, Ortiz-Zapater E. The epithelium takes the stage in asthma and inflammatory bowel diseases. Front Cell Dev Biol 2024; 12:1258859. [PMID: 38529406 PMCID: PMC10961468 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1258859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024] Open
Abstract
The epithelium is a dynamic barrier and the damage to this epithelial layer governs a variety of complex mechanisms involving not only epithelial cells but all resident tissue constituents, including immune and stroma cells. Traditionally, diseases characterized by a damaged epithelium have been considered "immunological diseases," and research efforts aimed at preventing and treating these diseases have primarily focused on immuno-centric therapeutic strategies, that often fail to halt or reverse the natural progression of the disease. In this review, we intend to focus on specific mechanisms driven by the epithelium that ensure barrier function. We will bring asthma and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases into the spotlight, as we believe that these two diseases serve as pertinent examples of epithelium derived pathologies. Finally, we will argue how targeting the epithelium is emerging as a novel therapeutic strategy that holds promise for addressing these chronic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rocío López-Posadas
- Department of Medicine 1, University Hospital of Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
- Deutsches Zentrum für Immuntherapie, Friedrich-Alexander-Universtiy Eralngen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Dustin C. Bagley
- Randall Centre for Cell and Molecular Biophysics, New Hunt’s House, School of Basic and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Carlos Pardo-Pastor
- Randall Centre for Cell and Molecular Biophysics, New Hunt’s House, School of Basic and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elena Ortiz-Zapater
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Universitat de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
- Instituto Investigación Hospital Clínico-INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
D'Amico F, Fasulo E, Jairath V, Paridaens K, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Danese S. Management and treatment optimization of patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2024; 20:277-290. [PMID: 38059454 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2023.2292768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease with a significant health-care burden worldwide. While medical therapy aims to induce and maintain remission, optimal management of mild to moderate UC remains challenging due to heterogeneity in severity classifications and non-standardized approaches. This comprehensive review summarizes current evidence and knowledge gaps to optimize clinical decision-making in patients with mild to moderate UC. AREAS COVERED After an extensive literature search of PubMed, Medline, and Embase through August 2023, we provide an overview of definitions utilized to characterize mild to moderate UC severity and established therapeutic targets. Current medical treatments including mesalazine formulations, corticosteroids, and their combinations are surveyed. The role of emerging intestinal ultrasound, telemedicine, and home testing is explored. Individualized, patient-centered paradigms aiming to streamline care delivery through proactive identification of relapses are also examined. EXPERT OPINION Addressing inconsistencies in disease activity stratification will better align tailored regimens with each patient's profile. Advancing noninvasive technologies like ultrasound criteria and home testing could improve UC management by enabling personalized models. Realizing individualized plans through informed shared-decision making between health-care providers and fully engaged patients holds promise to maximize quality of life outcomes. Continuous improvement relies on innovation bridging different domains to overcome current limitations and push the field toward more predictive and tailored care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferdinando D'Amico
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Ernesto Fasulo
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Vipul Jairath
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nancy University Hospital, Nancy, France
- INSERM, NGERE, University of Lorraine, Nancy, France
- INFINY Institute, Nancy University Hospital, Nancy, France
- FHU-CURE, Nancy University Hospital, Nancy, France
- Groupe Hospitalier privé Ambroise Paré - Hartmann, Paris IBD center, Neuilly sur Seine, France
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Silvio Danese
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dubinsky M, Rice A, Yarlas A, Hur P, Cappelleri JC, Kulisek N, Fahrny A, Bushmakin A, Biedermann L. Systematic Literature Review: Ability of the IBDQ-32 to Detect Meaningful Change in Ulcerative Colitis Health Indicators. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023:izad282. [PMID: 38150386 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izad282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Previous reviews produced weak evidence regarding the responsiveness of the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ-32) to changes in ulcerative colitis (UC) health indicators. This systematic review and meta-analysis provide an updated synthesis on IBDQ-32 responsiveness. METHODS A systematic literature review identified 11 articles reporting IBDQ-32 responder analyses in randomized control trials, which were included in a random effects meta-analysis, and 15 articles linking IBDQ-32 change to change in UC health indicators, which were summarized narratively. Meta-analysis compared differences between IBDQ-32 responder proportions in efficacious and nonefficacious treatment arms relative to placebo. Linear meta-regression examined the association of treatment efficacy and proportions of IBDQ-32 responders in active treatment compared with placebo. RESULTS Meta-analysis showed larger differences in IBDQ-32 response proportions between active treatment and placebo for efficacious treatments (pooled OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.83-2.63) than nonefficacious treatments (pooled OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.84-1.74; Cochran's Q[df = 1] = 8.26, P = .004). Meta-regression showed that the magnitude of treatment efficacy positively predicted IBDQ-32 response in active treatments relative to placebo (β = 0.21, P < .001). Moderate to strong correlations were found between change in IBDQ-32 and change in health indicators (eg, patient-reported measures, disease activity, endoscopic indices; correlations, 0.37-0.64 in absolute values). Patients achieving clinical response or remission showed greater change in IBDQ-32 total scores (range, 22.3-50.1 points) and more frequently met clinically meaningful thresholds on the IBDQ-32 than those not achieving clinical response or remission (all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS The IBDQ-32 is responsive to changes in UC health indicators and disease activity, including in response to efficacious treatment (relative to placebo).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Aaron Yarlas
- formerly of QualityMetric Incorporated, LLC, Johnston, RI, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Awadhi SA, Alboraie M, Albaba EA, Almutairdi A, Alsaad M, Azzam N, Barakat H, D’Amico F, Danese S, El Kady M, Ghoneim H, Hamoudi W, Jazzar A, Mosli M, Shehab H, Sneineh AA. Treatment of Patients with Mild to Moderate Ulcerative Colitis: A Middle East Expert Consensus. J Clin Med 2023; 12:6929. [PMID: 37959394 PMCID: PMC10650478 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12216929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Revised: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The prevalence of ulcerative colitis (UC) in the Middle East is increasing, impacting the economic and healthcare burden. The management of patients with mild to moderate UC is still a challenge as several factors can affect optimal care, including drug choice, induction and maintenance dose, treatment optimization and de-escalation, therapy duration, monitoring, and safety profile. We conducted an expert consensus to standardize the management of patients with mild to moderate UC. Sixteen experts in inflammatory bowel diseases, through a well-established and accepted Delphi methodology, voted and approved eight statements in order to provide practical guidance to clinicians in the Middle East.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sameer Al Awadhi
- Digestive Diseases Unit, Rashid Hospital, Dubai 003206, United Arab Emirates
| | - Mohamed Alboraie
- Department of Internal Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11884, Egypt;
| | - Emad Aldin Albaba
- Department of Medicine, Almana General Hospital, Alkhobar 31952, Saudi Arabia;
| | - Abdulelah Almutairdi
- Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh 11564, Saudi Arabia;
| | - Monther Alsaad
- Al Madar Medical Centre, Sharjah P.O. Box 80789, United Arab Emirates;
| | - Nahla Azzam
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia;
| | - Husam Barakat
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yarmouk University, Irbid 21163, Jordan;
| | - Ferdinando D’Amico
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (F.D.); (S.D.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Silvio Danese
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (F.D.); (S.D.)
| | - Mohamed El Kady
- Department of Medical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo 11559, Egypt;
| | - Hossam Ghoneim
- Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, Alexandria 5424041, Egypt;
| | - Waseem Hamoudi
- Internal Medicine Department, Al-Bashir Hospital, Amman 11151, Jordan;
| | - Ahmad Jazzar
- Gastroenterology Division, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Abu Dhabi 51900, United Arab Emirates;
| | - Mahmoud Mosli
- Department of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia;
| | - Hany Shehab
- Integrated Clinical and Research Center for Intestinal Disorders (ICRID), Gastroenterology Division, Endemic Medicine Department, Cairo University, Cairo 3725121, Egypt;
| | - Awni Abu Sneineh
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Marsool MDM, Vora N, Marsool ADM, Pati S, Narreddy M, Patel P, Gadam S, Prajjwal P. Ulcerative colitis: Addressing the manifestations, the role of fecal microbiota transplantation as a novel treatment option and other therapeutic updates. Dis Mon 2023; 69:101606. [PMID: 37357103 DOI: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2023.101606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/27/2023]
Abstract
The prevalence and incidence of Ulcerative Colitis (UC), a recurrent and remitting inflammatory condition, are rising. Any part of the colon may be affected, beginning with inflammation of the mucosa in the rectum and continuing proximally continuously. Bloody diarrhea, tenesmus, fecal urgency, and stomach pain are typical presenting symptoms. Many patients present with extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs) including musculoskeletal, ocular, renal, hepatobiliary, and dermatological presentation, among others. Most cases are treated with pharmacological therapy including mesalazine and glucocorticoids. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a novel procedure that is increasingly being used to treat UC, however, its use yet remains controversial because of uncertain efficacy. FMT can lower gut permeability and consequently disease severity by boosting short-chain fatty acids production, helping in epithelial barrier integrity preservation. Upadacitinib (JAK Kinase inhibitor) is another newer treatment option, which is an FDA-approved drug that is being used to treat UC. This review article provides a comprehensive review of the EIMs of UC, the role of FMT along with various recent clinical trials pertaining to FMT as well as other diagnostic and therapeutic updates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Neel Vora
- B. J. Medical College, Ahmedabad, India
| | | | - Shefali Pati
- St George's University, School of Medicine, Grenada
| | | | - Parth Patel
- Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, India
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Steinsbø Ø, Carlsen A, Aasprong OG, Aabakken L, Tvedt-Gundersen E, Bjørkhaug S, Gjerde R, Normann Karlsen L, Grimstad T. Histologic healing and factors associated with complete remission following conventional treatment in ulcerative colitis. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2022; 15:17562848221140659. [PMID: 36506747 PMCID: PMC9729989 DOI: 10.1177/17562848221140659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic and histological activity scores in ulcerative colitis (UC) are associated with clinical outcomes and have become important targets of clinical trials. However, these endpoints have been scarcely investigated in patients receiving only conventional treatment. OBJECTIVE We aimed to assess the deep and complete remission rates after 3 months of conventional treatment in patients with newly diagnosed UC with moderate to severe endoscopic activity. We also aimed to investigate whether selected clinical and biochemical variables at baseline were associated with complete remission status after 3 months. DESIGN This was a prospective cohort study. METHODS Newly diagnosed patients with active UC commencing 5-aminosalicylate, corticosteroid, and/or azathioprine treatment were consecutively included. Clinical, biochemical, endoscopic, and histological data were collected at baseline and after 3 months. Rates of clinical remission (Partial Mayo Score ⩽ 2), mucosal healing (Mayo Endoscopic Score ⩽ 1), and histologic healing (Nancy Index ⩽ 1) were determined. Deep remission was assessed as clinical remission plus mucosal healing and complete remission as deep remission plus histologic healing. Predictors of complete remission were identified by logistic regression. RESULTS A total of 180 patients were included in the study. Deep remission and complete remission occurred in 62.8% and 42.2% of patients, respectively. Thus, of patients in deep remission one-third had persistent histologic activity. Histologic activity in mucosally healed patients was associated with higher symptom scores and faecal calprotectin levels. Of baseline variables, less endoscopic distribution and disease activity showed strongest association with achieving complete remission, and limited distribution in combination with moderate activity gave highest odds for complete remission (odds ratio: 4.1, 95% confidence interval: 7.69-2.18). CONCLUSION In patients with mucosal healing, persistent histologic activity was a common finding and was associated with increased disease activity. Pancolitis and severe inflammatory activity at baseline were associated with lower complete remission rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Arne Carlsen
- Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | | | - Lars Aabakken
- Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Espen Tvedt-Gundersen
- Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Steinar Bjørkhaug
- Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Rune Gjerde
- Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Lars Normann Karlsen
- Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Tore Grimstad
- Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway,Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Aslam N, Lo SW, Sikafi R, Barnes T, Segal J, Smith PJ, Limdi JK. A review of the therapeutic management of ulcerative colitis. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2022; 15:17562848221138160. [PMID: 36478780 PMCID: PMC9720837 DOI: 10.1177/17562848221138160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic relapsing and remitting gastrointestinal disorder of uncertain aetiology. The last two decades have seen an expansion in the therapeutic arsenal used to treat UC. This has resulted in improved clinical remission and response rates. Nonetheless, staples in our current medical management originate from trials conducted in the early 20th century. In this review article, we aim to outline the key milestones in the history of the medical management of UC in addition to highlighting promising therapeutic developments for the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Rafid Sikafi
- St Mark’s Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Tom Barnes
- Section of IBD – Division of Gastroenterology, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - Jonathan Segal
- Northern Hospital, Epping, Melbourne, VIC, Australia,Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Philip J Smith
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool University Hospitals Foundation NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jimmy K Limdi
- Section of IBD – Division of Gastroenterology, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK,Manchester Academic Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Park J, Cheon JH. Updates on conventional therapies for inflammatory bowel diseases: 5-aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, immunomodulators, and anti-TNF-α. Korean J Intern Med 2022; 37:895-905. [PMID: 35882566 PMCID: PMC9449200 DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2022.132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are rapidly increasing worldwide. IBDs are considered an emerging problem not only in Western countries but also in developing counties. The relapses and complications of active IBD mandate various medications. Nevertheless, hospitalization, emergency room visits, or surgery may be required, resulting in a socioeconomic burden. Great advances have been made in the development of new therapeutic options for IBD to achieve induction and maintenance remission. Nevertheless, conventional therapy is still the mainstay in the treatment of IBD. This review article provides an update on recent advances in conventional therapies, including 5-aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, immunomodulators, and anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents to treat IBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jihye Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Jae Hee Cheon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
- Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Vieujean S, Caron B, Jairath V, Benetos A, Danese S, Louis E, Peyrin-Biroulet L. Is it time to include older adults in inflammatory bowel disease trials? A call for action. THE LANCET. HEALTHY LONGEVITY 2022; 3:e356-e366. [PMID: 36098310 DOI: 10.1016/s2666-7568(22)00060-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2021] [Revised: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The therapeutic management of older patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is challenging, particularly because of the absence of evidence-based guidelines for these patients, who seem to frequently be excluded from clinical trials. In this systematic review we investigated the exclusion of older patients with IBD from phase 3 studies registered on PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov, by assessing the upper limit of age exclusion criteria and the percentage of patients older than 65 years included in the trials. Exclusion criteria other than age were also recorded, and comorbidities were analysed separately. Our review of 222 phase 3 studies shows that older patients are frequently excluded from IBD clinical trials because of their age, which was used as an exclusion criterion in 129 (58%) of the 222 assessed trials. Of the 32 trials that detailed the percentage of included patients who were 65 years or older, only 763 (5·4%) patients of the 14 124 patients included were older than 65 years. In addition to age, patients were also excluded because of comorbidities (mainly renal, hepatic, and cardiovascular, and used as an exclusion criterion in 76% of trials), a history of dysplasia (45% of trials), and previous treatment for IBD (19% of trials). We propose a three-step process that should enable the inclusion of all older patients in IBD clinical trials, regardless of their age, comorbidities, and frailty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Vieujean
- Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, University Hospital CHU of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Bénédicte Caron
- Department of Gastroenterology and Inserm NGERE U1256, Nancy University Hospital, University of Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Vipul Jairath
- Department of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada; Alimentiv, London, ON, Canada
| | - Athanase Benetos
- Inserm, DCAC, University of Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; CHRU-Nancy Brabois, Department of Clinical Geriatrics, University of Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Silvio Danese
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Edouard Louis
- Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, University Hospital CHU of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
- Department of Gastroenterology and Inserm NGERE U1256, Nancy University Hospital, University of Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ferretti F, Cannatelli R, Monico MC, Maconi G, Ardizzone S. An Update on Current Pharmacotherapeutic Options for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11092302. [PMID: 35566428 PMCID: PMC9104748 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11092302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Revised: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The main goals of Ulcerative Colitis (UC) treatment are to both induce and maintain the clinical and endoscopic remission of disease, reduce the incidence of complications such as dysplasia and colorectal carcinoma and improve quality of life. Although a curative medical treatment for UC has not yet been found, new therapeutic strategies addressing specific pathogenetic mechanisms of disease are emerging. Notwithstanding these novel therapies, non-biological conventional drugs remain a mainstay of treatment. The aim of this review is to summarize current therapeutic strategies used as treatment for ulcerative colitis and to briefly focus on emerging therapeutic strategies, including novel biologic therapies and small molecules. To date, multiple therapeutic approaches can be adopted in UC and the range of available compounds is constantly increasing. In this era, the realization of well-designed comparative clinical trials, as well as the definition of specific therapeutic models, would be strongly suggested in order to achieve personalized management for UC patients.
Collapse
|
12
|
Sood A, Mahajan R, Singh A, Midha V, Mehta V. Endoscopy for assessment of mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis: time bound or response guided? Intest Res 2022; 20:297-302. [PMID: 35124950 PMCID: PMC9344249 DOI: 10.5217/ir.2021.00099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
The timing of colonoscopy in patients with active ulcerative colitis (UC) lacks coherence. The published guidelines and recommendations advocate time-bound colonoscopy in patients with active UC to assess for mucosal healing. However, the practice of performing colonoscopies at fixed time frames lacks reasoning. The time to achieve mucosal healing in UC is not uniform across the patient populations and is influenced by the disease severity and efficacy and time to therapeutic response of the drugs being used. Additionally, with the availability of sensitive noninvasive inflammatory biomarkers such as fecal calprotectin, that parallel the disease activity and correlate with mucosal healing, the notion of performing colonoscopy at fixed intervals sounds unjustifiable. The authors express their view that a response-guided colonoscopy (driven by normalization of clinical symptoms and inflammatory biomarkers), rather than a time-bound colonoscopy, would be more logical, apart from being cost-effective and patient-friendly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajit Sood
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dayanand Medical College, Ludhiana, India
| | - Ramit Mahajan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dayanand Medical College, Ludhiana, India
| | - Arshdeep Singh
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dayanand Medical College, Ludhiana, India
| | - Vandana Midha
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dayanand Medical College, Ludhiana, India
| | - Varun Mehta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dayanand Medical College, Ludhiana, India
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Raine T, Bonovas S, Burisch J, Kucharzik T, Adamina M, Annese V, Bachmann O, Bettenworth D, Chaparro M, Czuber-Dochan W, Eder P, Ellul P, Fidalgo C, Fiorino G, Gionchetti P, Gisbert JP, Gordon H, Hedin C, Holubar S, Iacucci M, Karmiris K, Katsanos K, Kopylov U, Lakatos PL, Lytras T, Lyutakov I, Noor N, Pellino G, Piovani D, Savarino E, Selvaggi F, Verstockt B, Spinelli A, Panis Y, Doherty G. ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutics in Ulcerative Colitis: Medical Treatment. J Crohns Colitis 2022; 16:2-17. [PMID: 34635919 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 265] [Impact Index Per Article: 132.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Raine
- Department of Gastroenterology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Stefanos Bonovas
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Johan Burisch
- Gastrounit, Medical Division, Hvidovre Hospital; Copenhagen Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children, Adolescents and Adults, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Torsten Kucharzik
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lüneburg Hospital, University of Hamburg, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Michel Adamina
- Department of Surgery, Clinic of Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Clinical Research and Artificial Intelligence in Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Allschwil, Switzerland
| | - Vito Annese
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fakeeh University Hospital, Dubai, UAE
| | - Oliver Bachmann
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Siloah St. Trudpert Hospital, Pforzheim; Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Dominik Bettenworth
- University Hospital Munster, Department of Medicine B - Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Munster, Germany
| | - Maria Chaparro
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain
| | - Wladyslawa Czuber-Dochan
- King's College London, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, London, UK
| | - Piotr Eder
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dietetics and Internal Medicine - Poznań University of Medical Sciences; Heliodor Święcicki University Hospital, Poznań, Poland
| | - Pierre Ellul
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta
| | - Catarina Fidalgo
- Gastroenterology Division, Hospital Beatriz Ângelo, Loures, Portugal
| | - Gionata Fiorino
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University; IBD Center, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Gionchetti
- IBD Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna DIMEC, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Javier P Gisbert
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain
| | - Hannah Gordon
- Department of Gastroenterology, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Charlotte Hedin
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Medicine Solna; Karolinska University Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology, Dermatovenereology and Rheumatology, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Stefan Holubar
- Department of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Marietta Iacucci
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham; Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Konstantinos Katsanos
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Division of Internal Medicine, University and Medical School of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Uri Kopylov
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tel-HaShomer Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, and Sackler Medical School, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Peter L Lakatos
- Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- 1st Department of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Theodore Lytras
- School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Ivan Lyutakov
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital 'Tsaritsa Yoanna - ISUL', Medical University Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Nurulamin Noor
- Department of Gastroenterology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Universitá degli Studi della Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli', Naples, Italy
- Colorectal Surgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Daniele Piovani
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Edoardo Savarino
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Francesco Selvaggi
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Universitá degli Studi della Campania 'Luigi Vanvitelli', Naples, Italy
| | - Bram Verstockt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven; Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, TARGID - IBD, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Antonino Spinelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Yves Panis
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Clichy and Université of Paris, France
| | - Glen Doherty
- Department of Gastroenterology and Centre for Colorectal Disease, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kim YS. Treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases: focusing on 5-aminosalicylates and immunomodulators. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION 2021. [DOI: 10.5124/jkma.2021.64.9.596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Recently, the incidence and prevalence rates of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have increased worldwide, including in Korea. Although there has been considerable progress in the management of IBD following the discovery of biologic agents, 5-aminosalicylate (5-ASA) and immunomodulators are still considered cornerstones in the management of mild to moderate IBD.Current Concepts: 5-ASA plays a key role in inducing remission in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis. High doses of 5-ASA are more effective in inducing remission in patients with moderate ulcerative colitis, and combination therapy of oral 5-ASA and topical 5-ASA agents is recommended. Although the effect of 5-ASA in patients with Crohn disease is limited, high doses of 5-ASA can be effective for patients with mild disease, inflammatory behavior, and colonic involvement. Maintaining remission is essential for patients with IBD. Good doctor-patient relationships and encouraging drug adherence are recommended. Regarding drug adherence, a once-daily regimen is preferred for patients’ satisfaction. Thiopurines, the most important immunomodulators, show therapeutic benefits, such as steroid-sparing effects and remission maintenance in ulcerative colitis and Crohn disease after induction therapy. However, several side effects, including severe leukopenia, can induce the discontinuation of thiopurines. Close monitoring and management decisions should be individualized according to the risk of relapse and adverse events.Discussion and Conclusion: In conclusion, 5-ASA and immunomodulators are cornerstones in the management of IBD. As such, clinicians should have knowledge of these drugs and patients’ characteristics for proper prescription.
Collapse
|
15
|
Fossmark R, Olaisen M, Martinsen TC, Melberg HO. Factors associated with the persistence of oral 5-aminosalicylic acid monotherapy in ulcerative colitis: a nationwide Norwegian cohort study. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2021; 14:17562848211021760. [PMID: 34262610 PMCID: PMC8243103 DOI: 10.1177/17562848211021760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oral 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) is the mainstay treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) and therapy with oral 5-ASA is associated with beneficial outcomes. We have examined factors associated with the persistence of oral 5-ASA treatment in a national cohort of UC patients. METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed UC from 2010 to 2014 using oral 5-ASA monotherapy were identified by combining data from the Norwegian Patient Registry and the Norwegian Prescription Database. The median follow-up time was 1029 days. Drug persistence was defined as duration of oral 5-ASA preparation as monotherapy. Non-persistence of a oral 5-ASA preparation as monotherapy was defined as stopping oral 5-ASA, initiation of any further anti-inflammatory treatment including a course of glucocorticoids and a change to another oral 5-ASA preparation. Drug persistence was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and influence of covariates on drug persistence was analyzed with the Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS A total of 3421 patients were identified. The overall median 5-ASA drug persistence was 179 days. In univariate analyses, persistence was associated with preparation type and high-dose treatment, while oral glucocorticoid use or hospitalization around the start of oral 5-ASA were associated with shorter 5-ASA persistence. In multivariate analyses, oral glucocorticoids [HR 1.67 (1.54-1.80), p < 0.005] and hospitalization around start of 5-ASA [HR 1.23 (1.14-1.34), p < 0.005] were associated with non-persistence, whereas high dose (⩾3 g/day) 5-ASA was associated with longer persistence [HR 0.68 (0.65-0.71), p < 0.005]. CONCLUSION High-dose treatment with oral 5-ASA was associated with longer persistence of oral 5-ASA monotherapy, whereas the presence of factors indicating more severe disease around initiation of 5-ASA monotherapy was associated with a shorter persistence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maya Olaisen
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine,
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU - Norwegian University of
Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,
St. Olav’s Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Tom Christian Martinsen
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine,
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU - Norwegian University of
Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,
St. Olav’s Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel disease is a chronic disorder of intestinal inflammation and includes Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. The goal of therapy is to induce and maintain remission, which is achieved with conventional therapies. Mesalamine is considered a first-line therapy for ulcerative colitis. Clinical trials have confirmed its efficacy and safety in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis. Doses of more than 2.4 g/d achieve significantly higher rates of clinical and endoscopic remission, with a decreased risk of relapse. Serious adverse effects are rare, but nonadherence is common. Mesalamine is considered safe in pregnancy, excluding formulations with dibutyl phthalate.
Collapse
|
17
|
Alkhatry M, Al-Rifai A, Annese V, Georgopoulos F, Jazzar AN, Khassouan AM, Koutoubi Z, Nathwani R, Taha MS, Limdi JK. First United Arab Emirates consensus on diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel diseases: A 2020 Delphi consensus. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26:6710-6769. [PMID: 33268959 PMCID: PMC7684461 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i43.6710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2020] [Revised: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease are the main entities of inflammatory bowel disease characterized by chronic remittent inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. The incidence and prevalence are on the rise worldwide, and the heterogeneity between patients and within individuals over time is striking. The progressive advance in our understanding of the etiopathogenesis coupled with an unprecedented increase in therapeutic options have changed the management towards evidence-based interventions by clinicians with patients. This guideline was stimulated and supported by the Emirates Gastroenterology and Hepatology Society following a systematic review and a Delphi consensus process that provided evidence- and expert opinion-based recommendations. Comprehensive up-to-date guidance is provided regarding diagnosis, evaluation of disease severity, appropriate and timely use of different investigations, choice of appropriate therapy for induction and remission phase according to disease severity, and management of main complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Alkhatry
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Department, Ibrahim Bin Hamad Obaid Allah Hospital, Ministry of Health and Prevention, Ras Al Khaiman, United Arab Emirates
| | - Ahmad Al-Rifai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheikh Shakbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Vito Annese
- Department of Gastroenterology, Valiant Clinic, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, American Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | | | - Ahmad N Jazzar
- Gastroenterology Division, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Ahmed M Khassouan
- Digestive Disease Unit, Rashid Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Zaher Koutoubi
- Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Rahul Nathwani
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mediclinic City Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mohammed Bin Rashid University, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Mazen S Taha
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tawam Hospital, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Jimmy K Limdi
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester Academic Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M8 5RB, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Dhillon P, Singh K. Therapeutic applications of probiotics in ulcerative colitis: An updated review. PHARMANUTRITION 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.phanu.2020.100194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
19
|
Lamb CA, Kennedy NA, Raine T, Hendy PA, Smith PJ, Limdi JK, Hayee B, Lomer MCE, Parkes GC, Selinger C, Barrett KJ, Davies RJ, Bennett C, Gittens S, Dunlop MG, Faiz O, Fraser A, Garrick V, Johnston PD, Parkes M, Sanderson J, Terry H, Gaya DR, Iqbal TH, Taylor SA, Smith M, Brookes M, Hansen R, Hawthorne AB. British Society of Gastroenterology consensus guidelines on the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults. Gut 2019; 68:s1-s106. [PMID: 31562236 PMCID: PMC6872448 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-318484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1184] [Impact Index Per Article: 236.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2019] [Revised: 06/10/2019] [Accepted: 06/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are the principal forms of inflammatory bowel disease. Both represent chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract, which displays heterogeneity in inflammatory and symptomatic burden between patients and within individuals over time. Optimal management relies on understanding and tailoring evidence-based interventions by clinicians in partnership with patients. This guideline for management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults over 16 years of age was developed by Stakeholders representing UK physicians (British Society of Gastroenterology), surgeons (Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland), specialist nurses (Royal College of Nursing), paediatricians (British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition), dietitians (British Dietetic Association), radiologists (British Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology), general practitioners (Primary Care Society for Gastroenterology) and patients (Crohn's and Colitis UK). A systematic review of 88 247 publications and a Delphi consensus process involving 81 multidisciplinary clinicians and patients was undertaken to develop 168 evidence- and expert opinion-based recommendations for pharmacological, non-pharmacological and surgical interventions, as well as optimal service delivery in the management of both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Comprehensive up-to-date guidance is provided regarding indications for, initiation and monitoring of immunosuppressive therapies, nutrition interventions, pre-, peri- and postoperative management, as well as structure and function of the multidisciplinary team and integration between primary and secondary care. Twenty research priorities to inform future clinical management are presented, alongside objective measurement of priority importance, determined by 2379 electronic survey responses from individuals living with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, including patients, their families and friends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Andrew Lamb
- Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Nicholas A Kennedy
- Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
- University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Tim Raine
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS FoundationTrust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Philip Anthony Hendy
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Philip J Smith
- Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jimmy K Limdi
- The Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
- University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Bu'Hussain Hayee
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- King's College London, London, UK
| | - Miranda C E Lomer
- King's College London, London, UK
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Gareth C Parkes
- Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
| | - Christian Selinger
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
- University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - R Justin Davies
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS FoundationTrust, Cambridge, UK
- University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Cathy Bennett
- Systematic Research Ltd, Quorn, UK
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Malcolm G Dunlop
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Omar Faiz
- Imperial College London, London, UK
- St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | - Aileen Fraser
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | | | | | - Miles Parkes
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS FoundationTrust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jeremy Sanderson
- King's College London, London, UK
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Daniel R Gaya
- Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
- University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Tariq H Iqbal
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham NHSFoundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Stuart A Taylor
- University College London, London, UK
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Melissa Smith
- Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - Matthew Brookes
- Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
- University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Richard Hansen
- Royal Hospital for Children Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
- University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are the principal forms of inflammatory bowel disease. Both represent chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract, which displays heterogeneity in inflammatory and symptomatic burden between patients and within individuals over time. Optimal management relies on understanding and tailoring evidence-based interventions by clinicians in partnership with patients. This guideline for management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults over 16 years of age was developed by Stakeholders representing UK physicians (British Society of Gastroenterology), surgeons (Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland), specialist nurses (Royal College of Nursing), paediatricians (British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition), dietitians (British Dietetic Association), radiologists (British Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology), general practitioners (Primary Care Society for Gastroenterology) and patients (Crohn's and Colitis UK). A systematic review of 88 247 publications and a Delphi consensus process involving 81 multidisciplinary clinicians and patients was undertaken to develop 168 evidence- and expert opinion-based recommendations for pharmacological, non-pharmacological and surgical interventions, as well as optimal service delivery in the management of both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Comprehensive up-to-date guidance is provided regarding indications for, initiation and monitoring of immunosuppressive therapies, nutrition interventions, pre-, peri- and postoperative management, as well as structure and function of the multidisciplinary team and integration between primary and secondary care. Twenty research priorities to inform future clinical management are presented, alongside objective measurement of priority importance, determined by 2379 electronic survey responses from individuals living with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, including patients, their families and friends.
Collapse
|
21
|
Tripathi K, Feuerstein JD. New developments in ulcerative colitis: latest evidence on management, treatment, and maintenance. Drugs Context 2019; 8:212572. [PMID: 31065290 PMCID: PMC6490072 DOI: 10.7573/dic.212572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2018] [Revised: 03/21/2019] [Accepted: 03/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic idiopathic inflammatory disorder that involves any part of the colon starting in the rectum in a continuous fashion presenting typically with symptoms such as bloody diarrhea, abdominal pain, and rectal urgency. UC is diagnosed based on clinical presentation and endoscopic evidence of inflammation in the colon starting in the rectum and extending proximally in the colon. The clinical presentation of the disease usually dictates the choice of pharmacologic therapy, where the goal is to first induce remission and then maintain a corticosteroid-free remission. There are multiple classes of drugs that are available and are used based on the clinical severity of the disease. For mild-to-moderate disease, oral or rectal formulations of 5-aminosalicylic acid are used. In moderate-to-severe UC, corticosteroids are usually used in induction of remission with or without another class of medications such as thiopurines or biologics including anti-tumor necrosis factor, anti-integrins, or Janus kinase inhibitors for maintenance of remission. Up to 15% of the patients may require surgery as they fail to respond to medications and have risk of developing dysplasia secondary to longstanding colitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joseph D Feuerstein
- Department of Medicine and Division of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease: Expanding horizon. Indian J Gastroenterol 2019; 38:98-109. [PMID: 31037509 DOI: 10.1007/s12664-019-00950-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2018] [Accepted: 02/27/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Management of inflammatory bowel diseases has witnessed paradigm shift from 5-aminosalicylic acid and glucocorticoids to various immunosuppressant and biological agents. Targets of therapy have also been changed drastically from symptomatic improvement to mucosal, histological healing, and recently transmural healing. Mucosal healing is associated with reduced need of steroid therapy, hospitalization, and surgery. However, whether mucosal healing alters the natural history of disease remains to be proven. Though assessment of mucosal healing is traditionally done by endoscopic examination, newer tests like fecal calprotectin, capsule endoscopy, and magnetic resonance enterography have also shown promising results. Various immunosuppressants and biologicals are the main therapy being used to achieve mucosal healing. This review focuses on the need for achieving mucosal healing, its long-term benefits, various methods and algorithm for diagnosis, and achievement of mucosal healing.
Collapse
|
23
|
Jackson B, De Cruz P. Algorithms to facilitate shared decision-making for the management of mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 12:1079-1100. [PMID: 30284911 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2018.1530109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Nonadherence has been a key barrier to the efficacy of medical treatments in ulcerative colitis (UC). Engaging patients in their IBD care via shared decision-making (SDM) to facilitate self-management may improve adherence to therapy. Areas covered: This review aims to summarize the most recent trial evidence from 2012 to 2017 for mild-to-moderate UC in order to develop clinical algorithms that guide SDM to facilitate self-management. A structured literature search via multiple electronic databases was performed using the search terms 'ulcerative colitis,' 'treatment,' 'management,' 'medication,' 'maintenance,' 'remission,' '5-ASA,' and 'inflammatory bowel disease. Expert commentary: Novel formulations of existing oral and topical medications have expanded the treatment options available for the induction and maintenance therapy for mild-to-moderate UC. Daily dosing of 5-ASA therapy is equivalent to twice daily dosing. The combination therapies of oral plus topical 5-ASA therapy and 5-ASA plus corticosteroid therapy are more effective than monotherapy. Budesonide MMX now plays a role in the management of mild-to-moderate UC. This review collates the evidence on drug efficacy and safety, adherence and tolerability, and noninvasive monitoring of mild-to-moderate UC into SDM-orientated algorithms to facilitate self-management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Belinda Jackson
- a Department of Gastroenterology , The Austin Hospital , Melbourne , Australia.,b Department of Medicine, Austin Academic Centre , University of Melbourne , Melbourne , Australia
| | - Peter De Cruz
- a Department of Gastroenterology , The Austin Hospital , Melbourne , Australia.,b Department of Medicine, Austin Academic Centre , University of Melbourne , Melbourne , Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Mezzina N, Campbell Davies SE, Ardizzone S. Nonbiological therapeutic management of ulcerative colitis. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2018; 19:1747-1757. [DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2018.1525361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolò Mezzina
- Gastrointestinal Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco – Department of Biochemical and Clinical Sciences “L. Sacco”, University of Milan, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Sandro Ardizzone
- Gastrointestinal Unit, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco – Department of Biochemical and Clinical Sciences “L. Sacco”, University of Milan, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Oliva S, Thomson M, de Ridder L, Martín-de-Carpi J, Van Biervliet S, Braegger C, Dias JA, Kolacek S, Miele E, Buderus S, Bronsky J, Winter H, Navas-López VM, Assa A, Chong SKF, Afzal NA, Smets F, Shaoul R, Hussey S, Turner D, Cucchiara S. Endoscopy in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Position Paper on Behalf of the Porto IBD Group of the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2018; 67:414-430. [PMID: 30130311 DOI: 10.1097/mpg.0000000000002092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Endoscopy is a central tool for the evaluation and management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In the last few decades, gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy has undergone significant technological developments including availability of pediatric-size equipment, enabling comprehensive investigation of the GI tract in children. Simultaneously, professional organization of GI experts have developed guidelines and training programs in pediatric GI endoscopy. This prompted the Porto Group on Pediatric IBD of the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition to develop updated guidelines on the role of GI endoscopy in pediatric IBD, specifically taking into considerations of recent advances in the diagnosis, disease stratification, and novel therapeutic targets in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salvatore Oliva
- Pediatric Gastroenterology and Liver Unit, Sapienza-University of Rome, Italy
| | - Mike Thomson
- Centre for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Sheffield Children's Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Lissy de Ridder
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Erasmus Medical Center/Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Javier Martín-de-Carpi
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Christian Braegger
- Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, University Children's Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jorge Amil Dias
- Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital Sao João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Sanja Kolacek
- Children's Hospital Zagreb, Faculty of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Erasmo Miele
- Department of Translational Medical Science, Section of Pediatrics, "Federico II," University of Naples, Italy
| | | | - Jiri Bronsky
- Department of Paediatrics, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Harland Winter
- Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Amit Assa
- Institute of Gastroenterology, Nutrition and Liver Diseases, Schneider Children's Medical Center, affiliated to the Sackler faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Sonny K F Chong
- Queen Mary's Hospital for Children, Epsom & St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, Carshalton, Surrey
| | - Nadeem Ahmad Afzal
- Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Francoise Smets
- Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, IREC, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Séamus Hussey
- National Children's Research Centre and Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Dan Turner
- Institute of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Salvatore Cucchiara
- Pediatric Gastroenterology and Liver Unit, Sapienza-University of Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Turner D, Ruemmele FM, Orlanski-Meyer E, Griffiths AM, de Carpi JM, Bronsky J, Veres G, Aloi M, Strisciuglio C, Braegger CP, Assa A, Romano C, Hussey S, Stanton M, Pakarinen M, de Ridder L, Katsanos K, Croft N, Navas-López V, Wilson DC, Lawrence S, Russell RK. Management of Paediatric Ulcerative Colitis, Part 1: Ambulatory Care-An Evidence-based Guideline From European Crohn's and Colitis Organization and European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2018; 67:257-291. [PMID: 30044357 DOI: 10.1097/mpg.0000000000002035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 232] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The contemporary management of ambulatory ulcerative colitis (UC) continues to be challenging with ∼20% of children needing a colectomy within childhood years. We thus aimed to standardize daily treatment of pediatric UC and inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD)-unclassified through detailed recommendations and practice points. METHODS These guidelines are a joint effort of the European Crohn's and Colitis Organization (ECCO) and the Paediatric IBD Porto group of European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN). An extensive literature search with subsequent evidence appraisal using robust methodology was performed before 2 face-to-face meetings. All 40 included recommendations and 86 practice points were endorsed by 43 experts in Paediatric IBD with at least an 88% consensus rate. RESULTS These guidelines discuss how to optimize the use of mesalamine (including topical), systemic and locally active steroids, thiopurines and, for more severe disease, biologics. The use of other emerging therapies and the role of surgery are also covered. Algorithms are provided to aid therapeutic decision-making based on clinical assessment and the Paediatric UC Activity Index (PUCAI). Advice on contemporary therapeutic targets incorporating the use of calprotectin and the role of therapeutic drug monitoring are presented, as well as other management considerations around pouchitis, extraintestinal manifestations, nutrition, growth, psychology, and transition. A brief section on disease classification using the PIBD-classes criteria and IBD-unclassified is also part of these guidelines. CONCLUSIONS These guidelines provide a guide to clinicians managing children with UC and IBD-unclassified management to provide modern management strategies while maintaining vigilance around appropriate outcomes and safety issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Turner
- Shaare Zedek Medical Center, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Frank M Ruemmele
- Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, APHP, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Paris, France
| | | | - Anne M Griffiths
- The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Jiri Bronsky
- Department of Paediatrics, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Gabor Veres
- 1st Department of Pediatrics, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Marina Aloi
- Pediatric Gastroenterology and Liver Unit, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Caterina Strisciuglio
- Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialistic Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli," Napoli, Italy
| | | | - Amit Assa
- Schneider Children's Hospital, Petach Tikva, Affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Claudio Romano
- Pediatric Department, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Séamus Hussey
- National Children's Research Centre, Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland and University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Mikko Pakarinen
- Helsinki University Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Lissy de Ridder
- Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Nick Croft
- Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Victor Navas-López
- Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition Unit. Hospital Materno, IBIMA, Málaga, Spain
| | - David C Wilson
- Child Life and Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Sally Lawrence
- BC Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Flamant M, Roblin X. Inflammatory bowel disease: towards a personalized medicine. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2018; 11:1756283X17745029. [PMID: 29383027 PMCID: PMC5784543 DOI: 10.1177/1756283x17745029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2017] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been transformed over the last two decades by the arrival of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist agents. Recently, alternative drugs have been approved, directed at leukocyte-trafficking molecules (vedolizumab) or other inflammatory cytokines (ustekinumab). New therapeutics are currently being developed in IBD and represent promising targets as they involve other mechanisms of action (JAK molecules, Smad 7 antisense oligonucleotide etc.). Beyond TNF antagonist agents, these alternative drugs are needed for early-stage treatment of patients with aggressive IBD or when the disease is resistant to conventional therapy. Personalized medicine involves the determination of patients with a high risk of progression and complications, and better characterization of patients who may respond preferentially to specific therapies. Indeed, more and more studies aim to identify factors predictive of drug response (corresponding to a specific signaling pathway) that could better manage treatment for patients with IBD. Once treatment has started, disease monitoring is essential and remote patient care could in some circumstances be an attractive option. Telemedicine improves medical adherence and quality of life, and has a positive impact on health outcomes of patients with IBD. This review discusses the current application of personalized medicine to the management of patients with IBD and the advantages and limits of telemedicine in IBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Xavier Roblin
- CHU de Saint-Etienne, Avenue Albert Raimond, 42277 Saint Priest en Jarez, France
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by periods of remission and periods of relapse. Patients often present with symptoms such as rectal bleeding, diarrhea and weight loss, and may require hospitalization and even colectomy. Long-term complications of UC include decreased quality of life and productivity and an increased risk of colorectal cancer. Mucosal healing (MH) has gained progressive importance in the management of UC patients. In this article, we review the endoscopic findings that define both mucosal injury and MH, and the strengths and limitations of the scoring systems currently available in clinical practice. The basic mechanisms behind colonic injury and MH are covered, highlighting the pathways through which different drugs exert their effect towards reducing inflammation and promoting epithelial repair. A comprehensive review of the evidence for approved drugs for UC to achieve and maintain MH is provided, including a section on the pharmacokinetics of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α drugs. Currently approved drugs with proven efficacy in achieving MH in UC include salicylates, corticosteroids (induction only), calcineurin inhibitors (induction only), thiopurines, vedolizumab and anti-TNFα drugs (infliximab, adalimumab, and golimumab). MH is of crucial relevance in the outcomes of UC, resulting in lower incidences of clinical relapse, the need for hospitalization and surgery, as well as reduced rates of dysplasia and colorectal cancer. Finally, we present recent evidence towards the need for a more strict definition of complete MH as the preferred endpoint for UC patients, using a combination of both endoscopic and histological findings.
Collapse
|
29
|
Atreya R, Neurath MF. Current and Future Targets for Mucosal Healing in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Visc Med 2017; 33:82-88. [PMID: 28612022 DOI: 10.1159/000458006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The induction and subsequent maintenance of mucosal healing has emerged as one of the central therapeutic goals in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) (Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis). Current and novel treatment options are assessed regarding their therapeutic efficacy on the basis of their ability to induce mucosal healing. However, there is still substantial debate about the precise definition of mucosal healing. Here, we will give an overview regarding the definitions of mucosal healing as well as its probable effects on long-term disease behavior and finally focus on current and potential therapeutic targets to achieve this therapeutic goal in IBD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raja Atreya
- Medical Clinic 1, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus F Neurath
- Medical Clinic 1, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Choi CH, Moon W, Kim YS, Kim ES, Lee BI, Jung Y, Yoon YS, Lee H, Park DI, Han DS. Second Korean guidelines for the management of ulcerative colitis. Intest Res 2017; 15:7-37. [PMID: 28239313 PMCID: PMC5323310 DOI: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.1.7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2017] [Revised: 01/10/2017] [Accepted: 01/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by a relapsing and remitting course. The direct and indirect costs of the treatment of UC are high, and the quality of life of patients is reduced, especially during exacerbation of the disease. The incidence and prevalence of UC in Korea are still lower than those of Western countries, but have been rapidly increasing during the past decades. Various medical and surgical therapies, including biologics, are currently used for the management of UC. However, many challenging issues exist, which sometimes lead to differences in practice between clinicians. Therefore, the IBD study group of the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases established the first Korean guidelines for the management of UC in 2012. This is an update of the first guidelines. It was generally made by the adaptation of several foreign guidelines as was the first edition, and encompasses treatment of active colitis, maintenance of remission, and indication of surgery for UC. The specific recommendations are presented with the quality of evidence and classification of recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chang Hwan Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Won Moon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - You Sun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Soo Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Bo-In Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yunho Jung
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Yong Sik Yoon
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Heeyoung Lee
- Center for Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Dong Il Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Soo Han
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Choi CH, Moon W, Kim YS, Kim ES, Lee BI, Jung Y, Yoon YS, Lee H, Park DI, Han DS. Second Korean Guideline for the Management of Ulcerative Colitis. THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2017; 69:1-28. [DOI: 10.4166/kjg.2017.69.1.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Chang Hwan Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Won Moon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - You Sun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Soo Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Bo-In Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yunho Jung
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Yong Sik Yoon
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Heeyoung Lee
- Center for Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Dong Il Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Soo Han
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Algaba A, Guerra I, García García de Paredes A, Hernández Tejero M, Ferre C, Bonillo D, Aguilera L, López-Sanromán A, Bermejo F. What is the real-life maintenance mesalazine dose in ulcerative colitis? REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS 2016; 109:114-121. [PMID: 28026200 DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4620/2016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe how mesalazine (MSZ) is used in our practice in ulcerative colitis (UC), at what dose, and the success rate (regarding adherence to therapy). METHODS Observational, transversal study, including all patients with UC and with MSZ maintenance therapy seen from September 2014 to February 2015 at two IBD units in Spain. Treatment adherence was measured by the Morisky-Green scale. RESULTS We included 203 patients (mean MSZ dose: 2.6 ± 1.0 g/d; median of treatment: 19.5 months [IQR: 8-48]). Doses < 2 g/d were used in 15.3% of cases, 2-2.9 g/d doses in 35.0%, 3-3.9 doses in 29.5%, and ≥ 4 g/d doses in the remaining 20.2%. A single daily dose was preferred in 51.2% of cases, two doses in 33.0% and three doses in 15.8%. A different MSZ brand had been previously used in 36.6% of patients. In 134 cases (66%), the maintenance dose had been increased during a flare-up, and in 49 (36.6% of cases) this higher dose had been kept for maintenance (dose ≥ 4 g/d in 36 patients). During the MSZ therapy, 14 patients (6.9%) suffered mild side effects (21.4% altered liver function tests). Therapy adherence was good in 81.8% of cases. CONCLUSIONS Half of our UC patients take high MSZ doses (≥ 3 g/d) as maintenance therapy, with acceptable safety and good adherence. Half of all patients take a single daily dose, and one third needed a different commercial brand during therapy. Opting for a higher MSZ maintenance dose is a possible strategy for a satisfactory maintenance therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alicia Algaba
- Digestivo, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, España
| | - Iván Guerra
- Digestivo, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada
| | | | | | - Carlos Ferre
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal
| | | | - Lara Aguilera
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Chhaya V, Saxena S, Cecil E, Subramanian V, Curcin V, Majeed A, Pollok RC. Steroid dependency and trends in prescribing for inflammatory bowel disease - a 20-year national population-based study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2016; 44:482-94. [PMID: 27375210 DOI: 10.1111/apt.13700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2016] [Revised: 04/12/2016] [Accepted: 05/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is unclear whether adherence to prescribing standards has been achieved in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). AIM To determine how prescribing of 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASAs), steroids and thiopurines has changed in response to emerging evidence. METHODS We examined trends in oral and topical therapies in 23 509 incident IBD cases (6997 with Crohn's disease and 16 512 with ulcerative colitis) using a nationally representative sample between 1990 and 2010. We created five eras according to the year of diagnosis: era 1 (1990-1993), era 2 (1994-1997), era 3 (1998-2001), era 4 (2002-2005) and era 5 (2006-2010). We calculated the proportion of patients treated with prolonged 5-ASAs (>12 months) and steroid dependency, defined as prolonged steroids (>3 months) or recurrent (restarting within 3 months) steroid exposure. We calculated the cumulative probability of receiving each medication using survival analysis. RESULTS Half of the Crohn's disease patients were prescribed prolonged oral 5-ASAs during the study, although this decreased between era 3 and 5 from 61.8% to 56.4% (P = 0.002). Thiopurine use increased from 14.0% to 47.1% (P < 0.001) between era 1 and 5. This coincided with a decrease in steroid dependency from 36.5% to 26.8% (P < 0.001) between era 1 and 2 and era 4 and 5 respectively. In ulcerative colitis, 49% of patients were maintained on prolonged oral 5-ASAs. Despite increasing thiopurine use, repeated steroid exposure increased from 15.3% to 17.8% (P = 0.02) between era 1 and 2 and era 4 and 5 respectively. CONCLUSIONS Prescribing in clinical practice insufficiently mirrors the evidence base. Physicians should direct management towards reducing steroid dependency and optimising 5-ASA use in patients with IBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Chhaya
- Department of Gastroenterology, St George's University Hospital, London, UK
| | - S Saxena
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - E Cecil
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - V Subramanian
- Department of Gastroenterology, St James University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - V Curcin
- Department of Health and Social Care Research, King's College London, London, UK
| | - A Majeed
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - R C Pollok
- Department of Gastroenterology, St George's University Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Takahashi F, Tominaga K, Kanamori A, Takenaka K, Hoshino A, Sugaya T, Nakano M, Hiraishi H. Timing for dose-down of 5-ASA depends on mucosal status with ulcerative colitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 2016; 51:827-34. [PMID: 26853910 DOI: 10.3109/00365521.2016.1141315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Although aminosalicylic acid (ASA) preparations have been used as first-line drugs for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC), no consistent view has been established regarding the ASA dose during the remission-maintenance phase of the disease. In this study, we examined whether the ASA dose should be reduced during the remission-maintenance phase. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study included 203 patients in the remission-maintenance phase of UC. The Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) was used to evaluate mucosa. Comparison and analysis were performed between patients whose ASA dose had been unchanged and whose dose had been reduced, between patients with endoscopic healing (EH) group and those without endoscopic healing (WEH) group, and between patients with an MES of 0 and 1. RESULTS Comparison between the unchanged-ASA and reduced-ASA groups revealed that the remission-maintenance rate was higher in the unchanged-ASA group (p < 0.001). Next, the remission-maintenance rate was higher in the EH/unchanged-ASA group than in the EH/reduced-ASA group (p = 0.042). Comparison between the MES 0 and 1 groups revealed that the remission-maintenance rate was higher in the MES 0 group (p = 0.007). In addition, no significant difference in remission-maintenance rates was observed between the MES 0/unchanged-ASA group and the MES 0/reduced-ASA group (p = 0.108). CONCLUSION When the same ASA dose is maintained regardless of the presence or absence of EH, remission is more likely to be maintained. If the ASA dose must be reduced, dose reduction is more advantageous after an MES of 0 is achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fumiaki Takahashi
- a Department of Gastroenterology , Dokkyo Medical University , Tochigi , Japan
| | - Keiichi Tominaga
- a Department of Gastroenterology , Dokkyo Medical University , Tochigi , Japan
| | - Akira Kanamori
- a Department of Gastroenterology , Dokkyo Medical University , Tochigi , Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Takenaka
- a Department of Gastroenterology , Dokkyo Medical University , Tochigi , Japan
| | - Atsushi Hoshino
- b Department of Internal Medicine , Japanese Red Cross Ashikaga Hospital , Tochigi , Japan
| | - Takeshi Sugaya
- a Department of Gastroenterology , Dokkyo Medical University , Tochigi , Japan
| | - Masakazu Nakano
- a Department of Gastroenterology , Dokkyo Medical University , Tochigi , Japan
| | - Hideyuki Hiraishi
- a Department of Gastroenterology , Dokkyo Medical University , Tochigi , Japan
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Okamoto R, Watanabe M. Role of epithelial cells in the pathogenesis and treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. J Gastroenterol 2016; 51:11-21. [PMID: 26138071 DOI: 10.1007/s00535-015-1098-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 137] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2015] [Accepted: 06/15/2015] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
In the past decades, continuous effort has been paid to deeply understanding the pathophysiology of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), such as ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease. As the disease typically arises as chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal mucosa, research has been focused on how such an uncontrolled, deleterious immune response may arise and persist in a certain cohort of patients. Based on those immunologic analyses, the establishment of anti-TNF-α therapy, and the following series of biologic agents achieved great success and dramatically changed the therapeutic strategy of IBD patients. However, to guarantee long-term remission of the disease, the therapeutic standard has been raised to achieve "mucosal healing", which requires complete repair of the gastrointestinal mucosa. Recent studies have revealed the unexpected importance of epithelial cells in the pathophysiology of IBD. The general barrier function as well as the cell lineage-specific functions have been deeply attributed to the development of chronic intestinal inflammation. Also, the groundbreaking establishment of the in vitro intestinal stem cell culture system has opened up a way of developing stem cell transplantation therapy to treat otherwise refractory ulcers that may persist in IBD patients. In this review, we would like to focus on the role of epithelial cells in the pathophysiology of IBD, and also give a perspective to the upcoming development of regenerative therapies that may become one of the therapeutic choices to achieve mucosal healing in refractory patients of IBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryuichi Okamoto
- Center for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.
| | - Mamoru Watanabe
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Dulai PS, Levesque BG, Feagan BG, D’Haens G, Sandborn WJ. Assessment of mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease: review. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 82:246-55. [PMID: 26005012 PMCID: PMC6709676 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.03.1974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2015] [Accepted: 03/20/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Mucosal healing is an important treatment end-point in inflammatory bowel disease, and achieving mucosal healing has been demonstrated to improve disease-related outcomes. Considerable uncertainty exists, however, regarding the optimal approach for the assessment of mucosal healing. AIMS To compare currently available diagnostic tools for the assessment of mucosal healing and outline the ideal approach to integrating these tools into clinical trials and clinical practice. METHODS Review article. RESULTS Endoscopy represents the criterion standard for the assessment of mucosal healing, and frequent endoscopic assessment is associated with a higher rate of achieving mucosal healing. The use of mucosal biopsy allows for the identification of persistent histologic disease activity, but the incremental clinical benefit of achieving histologic healing is yet to be determined. Magnetic resonance enterography has a high sensitivity for ulcer healing in endoscopically inaccessible disease activity. However, the presence of mucosal lesions cannot be reliably excluded based on this modality alone, and further small-bowel endoscopy should be considered in symptomatic patients. Video capsule endoscopy or device-assisted enteroscopy can be used, with device-assisted enteroscopy being preferred in stricturing Crohn's disease because of the risk of capsule retention or in patients in whom small-bowel malignancy is a possibility. CONCLUSIONS Endoscopy remains the criterion standard for the assessment of mucosal healing. Several alternative diagnostic modalities have become available that can be of value in specific clinical circumstances, particularly in patients with small-bowel involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parambir S. Dulai
- University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
- Robarts Clinical Trials, Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Barrett G. Levesque
- University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
- Robarts Clinical Trials, Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brian G. Feagan
- Robarts Clinical Trials, Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Geert D’Haens
- Robarts Clinical Trials, Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - William J. Sandborn
- University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
- Robarts Clinical Trials, Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The etiology of the inflammatory bowel diseases is unknown, although genetic factors play a role, and tobacco smoking has opposite effect on the two entities. Inflammation is central in the pathogenesis, and treatment is aiming to suppress it. The active part of salazopyrin, the oldest drug in use in the treatment of ulcerative colitis, is 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA). In the present paper, we wanted to discuss the etiology and pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis in relation to the beneficial effects of 5-ASA and particularly whether this compound has a specific effect on ulcerative colitis. METHODS/RESULTS 5-ASA seems to have a selective positive effect on ulcerative colitis in inducing remission, preventing relapse and possibly reducing the risk of cancer. In contrast to other agents used in the treatment of ulcerative colitis, 5-ASA does not have any known anti-inflammatory effect on other organs or other colonic inflammatory diseases like diverticulitis. Moreover, the effect on experimental colitis in rodents is not convincing. CONCLUSION 5-ASA seems to have a specific effect on the inflammation in ulcerative colitis. Research on the mechanism of its action may give information on the etiology of ulcerative colitis. 5-ASA is a first-line treatment that should be given once daily in high doses and for long term to reduce the possibility of recurrence and risk of colonic cancer. Side effects with 5-ASA are rare, and every patient with ulcerative colitis who tolerate this drug, should be treated with 5-ASA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Øyvind Hauso
- Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology , Trondheim , Norway
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mucosal healing (MH) has been associated with improved outcomes in ulcerative colitis but factors associated with MH are not well defined. METHODS Consecutive patients with ulcerative colitis in clinical remission (Mayo symptomatic subscore = 0) who had at least 1 colonoscopy since diagnosis from 6 centers were included. For patients who had at least 2 colonoscopies during follow-up, each colonoscopy was reviewed to define whether they had early MH (Mayo endoscopic subscore reduced to 0 within 3 yr of clinical remission). Factors associated with MH and early MH were determined using logistic regression. RESULTS Two hundred thirty-seven patients with ulcerative colitis (mean age 50.39 ± 14.10 yr; 56.5% male) were included. Independent factors for MH were clinical remission >3 years (odds ratio [OR] 4.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-13.1), mild/moderate mucosal inflammation (OR 3.3; 95% CI, 1.3-8.5), and immunosuppressant use (OR 4.6; 95% CI, 1.5-14.6). Among patients who had ≥2 of above factors, 74% achieved MH, whereas only 39% with <2 factors achieved MH (P < 0.001). Of patients in clinical remission <1 year, 1 to 3 years and >3 years, 30%, 45.9%, and 62.9% achieved MH, respectively. Immunosuppressant therapy was associated with early MH (P = 0.025). In multivariate analysis, patients with previous mild inflammation were more likely to achieve early MH than those with moderate/severe inflammation (OR 2.8; 95% CI, 1.2-6.2). CONCLUSIONS A longer disease remission, previous less severe mucosal inflammation, and immunosuppressant use are associated with MH. Severity of mucosal inflammation and use of immunosuppressant are also associated with early MH.
Collapse
|
39
|
Dignass A, Lindsay JO, Sturm A, Windsor A, Colombel JF, Allez M, d'Haens G, d'Hoore A, Mantzanaris G, Novacek G, Öresland T, Reinisch W, Sans M, Stange E, Vermeire S, Travis S, van Assche G. [Second European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of ulcerative colitis Part 2: Current management (Spanish version)]. REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGÍA DE MÉXICO 2015; 80:32-73. [PMID: 25769217 DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmx.2014.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2014] [Accepted: 10/23/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- A Dignass
- Contribuyeron por igual a este trabajo; Coordinadores del Consenso.
| | | | - A Sturm
- Contribuyeron por igual a este trabajo; Coordinadores del Consenso
| | - A Windsor
- Contribuyeron por igual a este trabajo; Coordinadores del Consenso
| | - J-F Colombel
- Contribuyeron por igual a este trabajo; Coordinadores del Consenso
| | - M Allez
- Contribuyeron por igual a este trabajo; Coordinadores del Consenso
| | - G d'Haens
- Contribuyeron por igual a este trabajo; Coordinadores del Consenso
| | - A d'Hoore
- Contribuyeron por igual a este trabajo; Coordinadores del Consenso
| | - G Mantzanaris
- Contribuyeron por igual a este trabajo; Coordinadores del Consenso
| | - G Novacek
- Contribuyeron por igual a este trabajo; Coordinadores del Consenso
| | - T Öresland
- Contribuyeron por igual a este trabajo; Coordinadores del Consenso
| | - W Reinisch
- Contribuyeron por igual a este trabajo; Coordinadores del Consenso
| | - M Sans
- Contribuyeron por igual a este trabajo; Coordinadores del Consenso
| | - E Stange
- Contribuyeron por igual a este trabajo; Coordinadores del Consenso
| | - S Vermeire
- Contribuyeron por igual a este trabajo; Coordinadores del Consenso
| | - S Travis
- Contribuyeron por igual a este trabajo; Coordinadores del Consenso
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ho EY, Cominelli F, Katz J. Ulcerative Colitis: What is the Optimal Treatment Goal and How Do We Achieve It? ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2015; 13:130-42. [PMID: 25619458 DOI: 10.1007/s11938-014-0044-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT The treatment paradigms and therapeutic options for ulcerative colitis (UC) have rapidly evolved during the past decade. Traditionally, the treatment target has focused on achieving successful induction and maintenance of steroid-free clinical remission. This has been shown to provide a better quality of life and a reduction in complications, hospitalizations, and surgery. Recent studies, however, suggest that achieving "mucosal healing" or endoscopic remission may be the optimal treatment endpoint. In this review, we will examine the treatment goals for UC and the efficacy of each therapy to reach these targets. We will also review the therapeutic options available for UC: mesalamines, steroids, immunomodulators, and biologics, including the first anti-integrin inhibitor, approved in May 2014, for the treatment of UC. Therapeutic drug monitoring, which measures serum drug level and anti-drug antibody concentrations, is emerging as an important clinical decision tool in patients on tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-antagonists. These evolving treatment strategies allow gastroenterologists to optimize control of the disease and offer patients a better quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edith Y Ho
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine and University Hospitals Case Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Bernstein CN. Treatment of IBD: where we are and where we are going. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110:114-26. [PMID: 25488896 DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2014.357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 143] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2014] [Accepted: 10/01/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
In assessing the best evidence for optimizing management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the focus is typically on anti-inflammatory agents and therapies that modulate the immune system. The intestinal immune response remains the key focus of developing therapies as well. In the past decade, the concept of dysbiosis of the gut microbiome has emerged as a potential pathogenetic focus in IBD, and with this a burgeoning interest in manipulating the microbiome as a means of controlling the disease has emerged. In this review, anti-inflammatory, immune-modulating, and microbiome-modulating therapies will be covered in terms of what is known today, as well as treatments that may be part of the therapeutic armamentarium in the near future. Concurrent with the evolution of our understanding of the basic biology of IBD, there is an increasing appreciation for the disconnect between patients' symptoms and inflammatory disease. As clinical trials have simultaneously addressed both symptom scores and mucosal healing, investigators and clinicians have gained a greater appreciation for the fact that many symptoms may not be driven by active inflammation, and hence focusing only on immunomodulatory therapies would not serve patients' needs fully. Furthermore, there is an emerging recognition of the importance of stress and psychological health in symptom experience and treatment needs. In this review, approaches to managing patients' symptoms as well as other adjunctive approaches to improving well-being will also be discussed. Finally, throughout this review, important research questions regarding different aspects of treatment will be proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles N Bernstein
- Section of Gastroenterology, University of Manitoba IBD Clinical and Research Centre, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Ultra-high dose of mesalamine to treat steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis. J Crohns Colitis 2014; 8:1745-6. [PMID: 25175785 DOI: 10.1016/j.crohns.2014.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2014] [Accepted: 08/12/2014] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
43
|
High- and low-dose oral delayed-release mesalamine in children with mild-to-moderately active ulcerative colitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2014; 59:767-72. [PMID: 25419597 PMCID: PMC4255757 DOI: 10.1097/mpg.0000000000000530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of high- and low-dose oral, delayed-release mesalamine in a randomized, double-blind, active control study of children with mild-to-moderately active ulcerative colitis. METHODS Patients ages 5 to 17 years, with a Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index (PUCAI) score of ≥ 10 to ≤ 55 and a truncated Mayo Score of ≥ 1 for both rectal bleeding and stool frequency, were enrolled. They received body weight-dependent doses of oral, delayed-release mesalamine for 6 weeks in a low- (27-71 mg · g(-1) · day(-1)) or high-dose group (53-118 mg · g(-1) · day(-1)). The primary endpoint was treatment success, defined as the proportion of patients who achieved remission (PUCAI score <10) or partial response (PUCAI score ≥ 10 with a decrease from baseline by ≥ 20 points). Secondary endpoints included truncated Mayo Score and global assessment of change of disease activity. RESULTS The modified intent-to-treat population included 81 of 83 patients enrolled. Treatment success by PUCAI was achieved by 23 of 41 (56%) and 22 of 40 (55%) patients in the mesalamine low- and high-dose groups, respectively (P = 0.924). Truncated Mayo Score (low-dose 30 [73%] and high-dose 28 [70%] patients) and other efficacy results did not differ between the groups. The type and severity of adverse events were consistent with those reported in previous studies of adults with ulcerative colitis and did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS Both low- and high-dose oral, delayed-release mesalamine doses were equally effective as short-term treatment of mild-to-moderately active ulcerative colitis in children, without a specific benefit or risk to using either dose.
Collapse
|
44
|
eHealth: individualization of mesalazine treatment through a self-managed web-based solution in mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2014; 20:2276-85. [PMID: 25248002 DOI: 10.1097/mib.0000000000000199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To individualize treatment with mesalazine for ulcerative colitis relapses through a self-managed, web-based solution to optimize the short-term disease course. METHODS Prospective, open-label, web-guided study with 3 months mesalazine therapy among patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. Once a week, patients completed the simple clinical colitis activity index (SCCAI) and registered fecal calprotectin (FC) on the web application: www.meza.constant-care.dk. SCCAI and FC were summed and resulted in a total inflammatory burden score (TIBS). Deep remission was defined as SCCAI ≤1; FC = 0, and TIBS ≤1. RESULTS A total of 95 patients (62% females; median age 45 yr) were included in the study and allocated 4.8 g mesalazine per day. Of these, 82 (86%) patients were adherent to web therapy, completing 3 months of web-guided mesalazine therapy. Of the 82 adherent patients, 72 (88%) continued mesalazine and 10 (12%) needed rescue therapy. From weeks 0 to 12, patients had experienced a significant reduction in mean SCCAI (4.6 versus 1.6, P < 0.001), mean FC (437 versus 195, P < 0.001), and mean TIBS (6.7 versus 2.4, P < 0.001). Based on TIBS values (≤1), the dose of mesalazine was reduced to 2.4 g in 25% of patients at week 3 in 50% of subjects at week 5 and in 88% of patients at week 12. CONCLUSIONS Web-guided therapy with mesalazine in mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis helps to individualize the dose and improve adherence to therapy. The study confirms mesalazine efficacy in mild-to-moderate UC, significantly improving TIBS values in majority of the patients.
Collapse
|
45
|
Osterman MT, Aberra FN, Cross R, Liakos S, McCabe R, Shafran I, Wolf D, Hardi R, Nessel L, Brensinger C, Gilroy E, Lewis JD. Mesalamine dose escalation reduces fecal calprotectin in patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 12:1887-93.e3. [PMID: 24793028 PMCID: PMC4214893 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.03.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2014] [Accepted: 03/31/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Among patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis (UC), lower fecal concentrations of calprotectin are associated with lower rates of relapse. We performed an open-label, randomized controlled trial to investigate whether increasing doses of mesalamine reduce concentrations of fecal calprotectin (FC) in patients with quiescent UC. METHODS We screened 119 patients with UC in remission on the basis of Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index scores, FC >50 μg/g, and intake of no more than 3 g/day mesalamine. Participants taking mesalamine formulations other than multimatrix mesalamine were switched to multimatrix mesalamine (2.4 g/day) for 6 weeks; 52 participants were then randomly assigned (1:1) to a group that continued its current dose of mesalamine (controls, n = 26) or a group that increased its dose by 2.4 g/day for 6 weeks (n = 26). The primary outcome was continued remission with FC <50 μg/g. Secondary outcomes were continued remission with FC <100 μg/g or <200 μg/g (among patients with pre-randomization values above these levels). RESULTS The primary outcome was achieved by 3.8% of controls and 26.9% of the dose escalation group (P = .0496). More patients in the dose escalation group reduced FC to below 100 μg/g (P = .04) and 200 μg/g (P = .005). Among the patients who were still in remission after the randomization phase, clinical relapse occurred sooner in patients with FC >200 μg/g compared with those with FC <200 μg/g (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with quiescent UC and increased levels of FC, increasing the dose of mesalamine by 2.4 g/day reduced fecal concentrations of calprotectin to those associated with lower rates of relapse. Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT00652145.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark T. Osterman
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
| | - Faten N Aberra
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
| | - Raymond Cross
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine
| | | | | | | | | | - Robert Hardi
- Chevy Chase Clinic Research and George Washington University Medical School
| | - Lisa Nessel
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
| | - Colleen Brensinger
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
| | - Erin Gilroy
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
| | - James D. Lewis
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania,Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania,Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Böhm SK, Kruis W. Long-term efficacy and safety of once-daily mesalazine granules for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2014; 7:369-83. [PMID: 25285021 PMCID: PMC4181447 DOI: 10.2147/ceg.s35691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In 1977, 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) was discovered as a therapeutically active moiety of sulfasalazine (SASP) and was launched for topical and oral therapy of ulcerative colitis (UC) in 1984. As a first-step, delivery systems had to be developed to protect 5-ASA against absorption in the upper gastrointestinal tract, resulting in different and competing strategies (azo compounds, controlled release, and pH-dependent release). In a second step, at the beginning of the new century, coinciding with the expiration of patent protection for the first 5-ASA formulations, two component composite release mechanisms (pH-dependent and controlled release) were developed. Furthermore, the drug was formulated as granules instead of tablets, allowing higher unit strengths compared with tablets. Neither Salofalk Granu-Stix®, nor MMX 5-ASA, nor Pentasa® granules have initially been developed for once-daily (OD) dosing. A review of the achievements of 20 years of 5-ASA development has demonstrated that 5-ASA has equal efficacy compared with SASP at best, that there are no measurable differences in efficacy between various 5-ASA preparations, and that in a group of patients tolerating SASP, adverse event profiles of SASP and 5-ASA did not differ significantly, with SASP being the far cheaper substance. Therefore, drug adherence came into focus as a new goal for improving UC therapy. Although adherence is a complex and multifactorial construct, a simple dosing schedule may contribute to higher drug adherence and better efficacy of treatment. Simultaneously, the US 5-ASA market, estimated to be worth US$1.4 billion, is expected to grow continuously. Naturally, this very competitive market is not only driven by scientific progress but also by commercial interests. Thus, patents for minor changes to the formulation may serve as protection against drug companies trying to launch generic versions. Randomized controlled trials performed on OD dosing in induction of remission have demonstrated that OD administration of 5-ASA is as effective as conventional dosing in mild to moderate active UC. The three 5-ASA products MMX, Salofalk®, and Pentasa® employed in those studies so far have not shown differences in efficacy between OD and conventional dosing. No differences regarding safety outcomes have been detected between OD and conventional dosing, including incidence of adverse events, serious adverse events, or withdrawal from treatment due to an adverse event. Although the majority of patients prefer OD dosing to conventional dosing, it was not possible to detect differences in adherence between OD and multiple dose regimens in the clinical trial setting. Well-designed and controlled large-scale community-based studies are necessary to further investigate and prove the point of improved long-term adherence and treatment efficacy in OD dosing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Karl Böhm
- Kantonsspital Baselland, Medizinische Universitätsklinik, Bruderholz, Switzerland
| | - Wolfgang Kruis
- Evangelisches Krankenhaus Kalk, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Sandborn WJ, Hanauer S, Van Assche G, Panés J, Wilson S, Petersson J, Panaccione R. Treating beyond symptoms with a view to improving patient outcomes in inflammatory bowel diseases. J Crohns Colitis 2014; 8:927-35. [PMID: 24713173 DOI: 10.1016/j.crohns.2014.02.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2013] [Revised: 02/25/2014] [Accepted: 02/26/2014] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Treatment goals in inflammatory bowel diseases are evolving beyond the control of symptoms towards the tight control of objectively-measured gastrointestinal inflammation. This review discusses the progress and challenges in adopting a treat-to-target approach in inflammatory bowel diseases. METHODS Evidence from the literature that highlights current thinking in terms of treating-to-target in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases is discussed. RESULTS Monitoring for objective evidence of inflammation using endoscopy, cross-sectional imaging or laboratory biomarkers may be a useful approach in inflammatory bowel diseases; however, setting the appropriate treatment goal remains a challenge. Deep remission (a composite of symptom control and mucosal healing) may now be a realistic target in Crohn's disease; however, it remains to be proven that achieving deep remission will modify the long-term disease course. Assessing prognosis at an early stage of the disease course is essential for the development of an appropriate management plan, with the rationale of adapting treatment to disease severity. An algorithm has been proposed for the treatment of early Crohn's disease that involves early treatment with immunosuppressants and tumour necrosis factor antagonists, in the hope of preventing structural bowel damage. CONCLUSIONS Treating beyond symptoms will require a clear management plan influenced by disease severity at presentation, clinical and biological prognostic factors, achievement and maintenance of clinical and biological remission and pharmacoeconomics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William J Sandborn
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
| | - Stephen Hanauer
- Digestive Disease Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Gert Van Assche
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Julián Panés
- Hospital Clinic University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Stephanie Wilson
- Departments of Radiology and Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Joel Petersson
- Global Medical Affairs Gastroenterology, AbbVie, Rungis, France
| | - Remo Panaccione
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Prostaglandin E-major urinary metabolite as a reliable surrogate marker for mucosal inflammation in ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2014; 20:1208-16. [PMID: 24846719 DOI: 10.1097/mib.0000000000000062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND C-reactive protein (CRP) is used as a biomarker of ulcerative colitis (UC) activity, but CRP levels are sometimes insufficient to reflect UC activity. Therefore, a simple noninvasive biomarker assay with sufficient sensitivity and specificity to accurately reflect UC activity is desired. Since prostaglandin E2 production and colonic inflammation are associated, we evaluated whether prostaglandin E-major urinary metabolite (PGE-MUM) can be used as such a biomarker. METHODS Patients with UC (n = 99) were enrolled from March 2011 to February 2012. UC activity was evaluated using the simple clinical colitis activity index in 99 patients, Mayo endoscopic scoring (Mayo) in 79 patients, and Matts' grading (Matts) in 64 patients. PGE-MUM levels were measured by radioimmunoassay kit and compared against CRP levels as a control. RESULTS Both PGE-MUM and CRP levels correlated with UC activity (P < 0.01). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of simple clinical colitis activity index, Mayo, and Matts for PEG-MUM were each higher than for CRP (0.93 > 0.73, 0.90 > 0.77, and 0.89 > 0.75, respectively). In multivariate logistic regression models, PGE-MUM was a significant independent predictor of histologic remission (sensitivity/specificity, 0.82/0.82) when the cutoff value was set to 17.0 μg/g creatinine, but CRP was not (0.69/0.69) (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Compared with CRP level, PGE-MUM level demonstrated better sensitivity for reflecting UC activity, especially in cases of histologic inflammation, and thus seems to be a better evaluator of mucosal healing. Because this method is simple, quick, and noninvasive, PGE-MUM seems to be a useful biomarker of UC.
Collapse
|
49
|
Bezzio C, Furfaro F, de Franchis R, Maconi G, Asthana AK, Ardizzone S. Ulcerative colitis: current pharmacotherapy and future directions. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2014; 15:1659-70. [DOI: 10.1517/14656566.2014.925445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
50
|
Abstract
Colonoscopic evaluation is an important tool in the evaluation of ulcerative colitis (UC). UC is divided by disease extent into proctitis, proctosigmoiditis, left-sided colitis, and pan-colitis. In addition, a cecal or peri-appendiceal patch and backwash ileitis are associated with UC. The extent and behavior of UC has been characterized further using various indices and scoring systems; among these systems is the Mayo Score, which is widely used in current clinical trials for new medications. As these medical therapies for UC have developed, achieving mucosal healing with medications has become an important therapeutic objective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth R Paine
- G.V. (Sonny) Montgomery VA Medical Center and Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA
| |
Collapse
|