Comparison of intubation following propofol and alfentanil with intubation following thiopentone and suxamethonium

Peri-operative management of neuromuscular blockade: A guideline from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care

Recent data indicated a high incidence of inappropriate management of neuromuscular block, with a high rate of residual paralysis and relaxant-associated postoperative complications. These data are alarming in that the available neuromuscular monitoring, as well as myorelaxants and their antagonists basically allow well tolerated management of neuromuscular blockade. In this first European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) guideline on peri-operative management of neuromuscular block, we aim to present aggregated and evidence-based recommendations to assist clinicians provide best medical care and ensure patient safety. We identified three main clinical questions: Are myorelaxants necessary to facilitate tracheal intubation in adults? Does the intensity of neuromuscular blockade influence a patient's outcome in abdominal surgery? What are the strategies for the diagnosis and treatment of residual paralysis? On the basis of this, PICO (patient, intervention, comparator, outcome) questions were derived that guided a structured literature search. A stepwise approach was used to reduce the number of trials of the initial research ( n  = 24 000) to the finally relevant clinical studies ( n  = 88). GRADE methodology (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) was used for formulating the recommendations based on the findings of the included studies in conjunction with their methodological quality. A two-step Delphi process was used to determine the agreement of the panel members with the recommendations: R1 We recommend using a muscle relaxant to facilitate tracheal intubation (1A). R2 We recommend the use of muscle relaxants to reduce pharyngeal and/or laryngeal injury following endotracheal intubation (1C). R3 We recommend the use of a fast-acting muscle relaxant for rapid sequence induction intubation (RSII) such as succinylcholine 1 mg kg -1 or rocuronium 0.9 to 1.2 mg kg -1 (1B). R4 We recommend deepening neuromuscular blockade if surgical conditions need to be improved (1B). R5 There is insufficient evidence to recommend deep neuromuscular blockade in general to reduce postoperative pain or decrease the incidence of peri-operative complications. (2C). R6 We recommend the use of ulnar nerve stimulation and quantitative neuromuscular monitoring at the adductor pollicis muscle to exclude residual paralysis (1B). R7 We recommend using sugammadex to antagonise deep, moderate and shallow neuromuscular blockade induced by aminosteroidal agents (rocuronium, vecuronium) (1A). R8 We recommend advanced spontaneous recovery (i.e. TOF ratio >0.2) before starting neostigmine-based reversal and to continue quantitative monitoring of neuromuscular blockade until a TOF ratio of more than 0.9 has been attained. (1C).

Guidelines on muscle relaxants and reversal in anaesthesia

OBJECTIVES

To provide an update to the 1999 French guidelines on "Muscle relaxants and reversal in anaesthesia", a consensus committee of sixteen experts was convened. A formal policy of declaration and monitoring of conflicts of interest (COI) was developed at the outset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industrial funding (i.e. pharmaceutical, medical devices). The authors were required to follow the rules of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to assess the quality of the evidence on which the recommendations were based. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations based on low-quality evidence were stressed. Few of the recommendations remained ungraded.

METHODS

The panel focused on eight questions: (1) In the absence of difficult mask ventilation criteria, is it necessary to check the possibility of ventilation via a facemask before muscle relaxant injection? Is it necessary to use muscle relaxants to facilitate facemask ventilation? (2) Is the use of muscle relaxants necessary to facilitate tracheal intubation? (3) Is the use of muscle relaxants necessary to facilitate the insertion of a supraglottic device and management of related complications? (4) Is it necessary to monitor neuromuscular blockade for airway management? (5) Is the use of muscle relaxants necessary to facilitate interventional procedures, and if so, which procedures? (6) Is intraoperative monitoring of neuromuscular blockade necessary? (7) What are the strategies for preventing and treating residual neuromuscular blockade? (8) What are the indications and precautions for use of both muscle relaxants and reversal agents in special populations (e.g. electroconvulsive therapy, obese patients, children, neuromuscular diseases, renal/hepatic failure, elderly patients)? All questions were formulated using the Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome (PICO) model for clinical questions and evidence profiles were generated. The results of the literature analysis and the recommendations were then assessed using the GRADE® system.

RESULTS

The summaries prepared by the SFAR Guideline panel resulted in thirty-one recommendations on muscle relaxants and reversal agents in anaesthesia. Of these recommendations, eleven have a high level of evidence (GRADE 1±) while twenty have a low level of evidence (GRADE 2±). No recommendations could be provided using the GRADE® system for five of the questions, and for two of these questions expert opinions were given. After two rounds of discussion and an amendment, a strong agreement was reached for all the recommendations.

CONCLUSION

Substantial agreement exists among experts regarding many strong recommendations for the improvement of practice concerning the use of muscle relaxants and reversal agents during anaesthesia. In particular, the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (SFAR) recommends the use of a device to monitor neuromuscular blockade throughout anaesthesia.

Avoidance versus use of neuromuscular blocking agents for improving conditions during tracheal intubation or direct laryngoscopy in adults and adolescents

BACKGROUND

Tracheal intubation during induction of general anaesthesia is a vital procedure performed to secure a patient's airway. Several studies have identified difficult tracheal intubation (DTI) or failed tracheal intubation as one of the major contributors to anaesthesia-related mortality and morbidity. Use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) to facilitate tracheal intubation is a widely accepted practice. However, because of adverse effects, NMBA may be undesirable. Cohort studies have indicated that avoiding NMBA is an independent risk factor for difficult and failed tracheal intubation. However, no systematic review of randomized trials has evaluated conditions for tracheal intubation, possible adverse effects, and postoperative discomfort.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of avoiding neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) versus using NMBA on difficult tracheal intubation (DTI) for adults and adolescents allocated to tracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy. To look at various outcomes, conduct subgroup and sensitivity analyses, examine the role of bias, and apply trial sequential analysis (TSA) to examine the level of available evidence for this intervention.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, BIOSIS, International Web of Science, LILACS, advanced Google, CINAHL, and the following trial registries: Current Controlled Trials; ClinicalTrials.gov; and www.centerwatch.com, up to January 2017. We checked the reference lists of included trials and reviews to look for unidentified trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effects of avoiding versus using NMBA in participants 14 years of age or older.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors extracted data independently. We conducted random-effects and fixed-effect meta-analyses and calculated risk ratios (RRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used published data and data obtained by contacting trial authors. To minimize the risk of systematic error, we assessed the risk of bias of included trials. To reduce the risk of random errors caused by sparse data and repetitive updating of cumulative meta-analyses, we applied TSA.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 34 RCTs with 3565 participants that met our inclusion criteria. All trials reported on conditions for tracheal intubation; seven trials with 846 participants described 'events of upper airway discomfort or injury', and 13 trials with 1308 participants reported on direct laryngoscopy. All trials used a parallel design. We identified 18 dose-finding studies that included more interventions or control groups or both. All trials except three included only American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I and II participants, 25 trials excluded participants with anticipated DTI, and obesity or overweight was an excluding factor in 13 studies. Eighteen trials used suxamethonium, and 18 trials used non-depolarizing NMBA.Trials with an overall low risk of bias reported significantly increased risk of DTI with no use of NMBA (random-effects model) (RR 13.27, 95% CI 8.19 to 21.49; P < 0.00001; 508 participants; four trials; number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) = 1.9, I² = 0%, D² = 0%, GRADE = moderate). The TSA-adjusted CI for the RR was 1.85 to 95.04. Inclusion of all trials resulted in confirmation of results and of significantly increased risk of DTI when an NMBA was avoided (random-effects model) (RR 5.00, 95% CI 3.49 to 7.15; P < 0.00001; 3565 participants; 34 trials; NNTH = 6.3, I² = 70%, D² = 82%, GRADE = low). Again the cumulative z-curve crossed the TSA monitoring boundary, demonstrating harmful effects of avoiding NMBA on the proportion of DTI with minimal risk of random error. We categorized only one trial reporting on upper airway discomfort or injury as having overall low risk of bias. Inclusion of all trials revealed significant risk of upper airway discomfort or injury when an NMBA was avoided (random-effects model) (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.74; P = 0.008; 846 participants; seven trials; NNTH = 9.1, I² = 13%, GRADE = moderate). The TSA-adjusted CI for the RR was 1.00 to 1.85. None of these trials reported mortality. In terms of our secondary outcome 'difficult laryngoscopy', we categorized only one trial as having overall low risk of bias. All trials avoiding NMBA were significantly associated with difficult laryngoscopy (random-effects model) (RR 2.54, 95% CI 1.53 to 4.21; P = 0.0003; 1308 participants; 13 trials; NNTH = 25.6, I² = 0%, D²= 0%, GRADE = low); however, TSA showed that only 6% of the information size required to detect or reject a 20% relative risk reduction (RRR) was accrued, and the trial sequential monitoring boundary was not crossed.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review supports that use of an NMBA may create the best conditions for tracheal intubation and may reduce the risk of upper airway discomfort or injury following tracheal intubation. Study results were characterized by indirectness, heterogeneity, and high or uncertain risk of bias concerning our primary outcome describing difficult tracheal intubation. Therefore, we categorized the GRADE classification of quality of evidence as moderate to low. In light of defined outcomes of individual included trials, our primary outcomes may not reflect a situation that many clinicians consider to be an actual difficult tracheal intubation by which the patient's life or health may be threatened.

Is propofol an optimal agent for procedural sedation and rapid sequence intubation in the emergency department?

Objective:

We conducted a qualitative systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of propofol for direct current cardioversion (DCC), rapid sequence intubation (RSI) and procedural sedation in adult emergency department (ED) patients.

Data source:

MEDLINE (1966 to September 2000), PubMed (to September 2000), EMBASE (1988 to September 2000), Database of Systematic Reviews (to September 2000), Best Evidence (1991 to September 2000) and Current Contents (1996 to September 2000) databases.

Study selection:

English-language, randomized, comparative evaluations of propofol for procedures routinely conducted in adults (&gt;18 years) were included. Direct current cardioversion, RSI and procedural sedation were considered.

Data extraction:

Efficacy and safety endpoints were evaluated for all trials. For DCC and procedural sedation trials, efficacy measures included induction and recovery times, as well as the association for successful procedure. For the RSI trials, optimal intubating conditions were evaluated as the primary efficacy endpoint. Safety measures included hemodynamic changes, apnea rates and adverse effects.

Data synthesis:

In the setting of DCC, efficacy and safety outcomes were similar for propofol, thiopental, etomidate and methohexital. All of these agents provided markedly shorter induction and recovery times than midazolam. Patients who were pre-medicated with fentanyl exhibited prolonged recovery times and greater decreases in blood pressure. When used for RSI, propofol administration was associated with satisfactory intubating conditions that were comparable to those seen with thiopental and etomidate. Blood pressure reductions were seen in both DCC and RSI studies. Apneic episodes (&gt;30 seconds) occurred in 23% of propofol recipients, 28% of thiopental recipients and 7% of etomidate and midazolam recipients. Apart from the DCC studies described, no procedural sedation studies met our predefined review eligibility criteria.

Conclusion:

The body of literature evaluating propofol for DCC and RSI in the ED is limited. There is evidence to support the use of propofol for DCC and RSI, but this evidence comes from stable patients in non-ED settings. Further ED-based randomized comparative trials should be conducted before propofol is adopted for widespread use in the ED.

Tracheal intubation without neuromuscular block in children

Endotracheal intubation has been performed during the administration of Propofol anaesthesia without neuromuscular blockade. In the study, we have assessed tracheal intubating conditions and haemodynamic responses in children aged 4 to12 years by using combination of either Fentanyl and Propofol; or Propofol and a neuromuscular blocker, suxamethonium. Intubating conditions were assessed on a 1-4 scale based on ease of laryngoscopy, position of vocal cords, degree of coughing and jaw relaxation. Tracheal intubation was successful in 95% of patients receiving Fentanyl-Propofol and 100% of patients receiving Propofol-suxamethonium. Fentanyl-Propofol provided better haemodynamic stability than Propofol-suxamethonium. We conclude that Propofol-Fentanyl combination could be a useful alternative technique for tracheal intubation when neuromuscular blocking drugs are contraindicated or need to be avoided.

Scandinavian clinical practice guidelines on general anaesthesia for emergency situations

Emergency patients need special considerations and the number and severity of complications from general anaesthesia can be higher than during scheduled procedures. Guidelines are therefore needed. The Clinical Practice Committee of the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine appointed a working group to develop guidelines based on literature searches to assess evidence, and a consensus meeting was held. Consensus opinion was used in the many topics where high-grade evidence was unavailable. The recommendations include the following: anaesthesia for emergency patients should be given by, or under very close supervision by, experienced anaesthesiologists. Problems with the airway and the circulation must be anticipated. The risk of aspiration must be judged for each patient. Pre-operative gastric emptying is rarely indicated. For pre-oxygenation, either tidal volume breathing for 3 min or eight deep breaths over 60 s and oxygen flow 10 l/min should be used. Pre-oxygenation in the obese patients should be performed in the head-up position. The use of cricoid pressure is not considered mandatory, but can be used on individual judgement. The hypnotic drug has a minor influence on intubation conditions, and should be chosen on other grounds. Ketamine should be considered in haemodynamically compromised patients. Opioids may be used to reduce the stress response following intubation. For optimal intubation conditions, succinylcholine 1-1.5 mg/kg is preferred. Outside the operation room, rapid sequence intubation is also considered the safest method. For all patients, precautions to avoid aspiration and other complications must also be considered at the end of anaesthesia.

Use of remifentanil for tracheal intubation for caesarean section in a patient with suxamethonium apnoea

A parturient presented for elective caesarean section with a history of multiple spinal operations and scoliosis and a biochemical diagnosis of suxamethonium apnoea. She declined any attempt at regional anaesthesia. We describe the use of a thiopental/remifentanil technique to relax the larynx and provide rapid and excellent conditions for laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. The parturient awoke following an uneventful caesarean section with excellent pain relief and no recall. The baby had normal Apgar scores and umbilical blood gas measurements.

Does the choice of intravenous induction drug affect intubation conditions after a fast-onset neuromuscular blocker?

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To compare intubation conditions and hemodynamic effects resulting from thiopental-rapacuronium, propofol-rapacuronium, and etomidate-rapacuronium intravenous (IV) induction.

DESIGN

Randomized, blinded study.

SETTING

Operating suites of a large university-affiliated medical center.

PATIENTS

60 ASA physical status I and II adult patients without airway abnormalities, who were scheduled for elective surgery requiring endotracheal intubation. Patients were randomly allocated to receive IV thiopental sodium 5 mg/kg (Group 1), propofol 2 mg/kg (Group 2), or etomidate 0.3 mg/kg (Group 3) followed by rapacuronium 1.5 mg/kg. Fifty seconds later, an anesthesiologist, who had no knowledge of the induction drug used, entered the operating room and attempted laryngoscopy and intubation.

MEASUREMENTS

Intubation conditions were graded as excellent, good, poor, or impossible according to Good Clinical Research Practice criteria. Arterial blood pressure and heart rate changes accompanying both induction techniques were also monitored and recorded.

MAIN RESULTS

All patients were intubated within 55 to 70 seconds. Clinically acceptable intubation conditions were not statistically different among the three groups. Moderate tachycardia after induction was seen in all three groups, and blood pressure was significantly lower in Group 2 than in Groups 1 or 3.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically acceptable intubation conditions are similar after either thiopental, propofol, or etomidate when a fast-onset neuromuscular blocking drug (rapacuronium 1.5 mg/kg) is used to facilitate tracheal intubation.

Muscle relaxation and increasing doses of propofol improve intubating conditions

PURPOSE

Muscle relaxants and anesthetics are usually associated during intubation. However, their relative role to facilitate the process is not clearly defined. This study was designed to determine, during intubation: i). the relative role of anesthetics and atracurium-induced neuromuscular block and; ii). the effect of different doses of propofol in the presence of complete muscle block.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to four groups and received fentanyl and a standardized anesthetic procedure. Patients from groups high (H; n = 45), medium (M; n = 48) and low (L; n = 47) received 2.5 mg x kg(-1), 2.0 mg x kg(-1), and 1.5 mg x kg(-1) of propofol respectively. Atracurium (0.5 mg x kg(-1)) was then injected and tracheal intubation performed once complete block was achieved at the orbicularis oculi. Patients from group without atracurium (WA; n = 20) received propofol as in group H. Intubation was performed at the expected onset time of action of atracurium.

RESULTS

Using the same dose of propofol, the incidence of good or excellent intubating conditions was 35% without atracurium and 95% with atracurium (P < 0.0001). In patients receiving atracurium, clinically acceptable intubating conditions were more frequently achieved in groups receiving the highest propofol doses (group H or M vs group L; P < 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms the interaction between anesthesia and muscle relaxation to produce adequate intubating conditions. In the conditions described, intubating conditions were more dependent on atracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade than on anesthetics, but both atracurium and propofol improved intubating conditions.

Cricoid yoke: the effect of surface area and applied force on discomfort experienced by conscious volunteers

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The application of cricoid force is central to techniques that reduce the risk of gastric regurgitation and the subsequent pulmonary aspiration associated with obstetric and emergency anaesthesia. The discomfort associated with cricoid force in awake preoperative patients increases the incidence of coughing, struggling and pain during induction of anaesthesia. This study determined if increasing the surface area of a cricoid yoke reduced the associated discomfort in volunteers.

METHODS

Fifty volunteers participated in a randomized single-blinded study. The cricoid yoke was positioned using standard anatomical landmarks and forces of 10, 20, 30 and 40 N were applied in a random order for 20s, using two different yoke attachments with surface areas of 3 and 10 cm2. A rest of 30s was allowed between the application of forces. Discomfort was graded by volunteers on a scale from 0 to 10 (0: no discomfort; 10: worse discomfort imaginable). A score of 10 was allocated if the volunteers could not tolerate the applied force for 20s.

RESULTS

Median scores for the small yoke were always higher than those for the large yoke at each force. There were significant differences between the scores for the small and large yokes at 10 and 20 N (P < 0.001) and 30 N (P = 0.0233), but there was no significant difference at 40 N.

CONCLUSIONS

The larger yoke was tolerated better by volunteers when clinically relevant cricoid forces were applied.

Tracheal intubation without muscle relaxants: remifentanil or alfentanil in combination with propofol

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

In some situations, the use of muscle relaxants (neuromuscular blocking drugs) are undesirable or contraindicated. We compared intubating conditions without muscle relaxants in premedicated patients receiving either alfentanil 40 microg kg(-1) or remifentanil 2, 3 or 4 microg kg(-1) followed by propofol 2 mg kg(-1).

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind study, 80 healthy patients were assigned to one of four groups (n = 20). After intravenous atropine, alfentanil 40 microg kg(-1) or remifentanil 2, 3 or 4 microg kg(-1) were injected over 90 s followed by propofol 2 mg kg(-1). Ninety seconds after administration of the propofol, laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation were attempted. Intubating conditions were assessed as excellent, good or poor on the basis of ease of lung ventilation, jaw relaxation, laryngoscopy, position of the vocal cords, and patient response to intubation and slow inflation of the endotracheal tube cuff.

RESULTS

Seven patients who received remifentanil 2 microg kg(-1) and one patient who received remifentanil 3 microg kg(-1) could not be intubated at the first attempts. Excellent intubating conditions (jaw relaxed, vocal cords open and no movement in response to tracheal intubation and cuff inflation) were observed in those who received either alfentanil 40 microg kg(-1) (45% of patients) or remifentanil in doses of 2 microg kg(-1) (20%), 3 microg kg(-1) (75%) or 4 microg kg(-1) (95%). Overall, intubating conditions were significantly better (P < 0.05), and the number of patients showing excellent conditions were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in patients who received remifentanil 4 microg kg(-1) compared with those who received alfentanil 40 microg kg(-1) or remifentanil 2 microg kg(-1). No patient needed treatment for hypotension or bradycardia.

CONCLUSIONS

Remifentanil 4 microg kg(-1) and propofol 2 mg kg(-1) administered in sequence intravenously provided good or excellent conditions for tracheal intubation in all patients without the use of muscle relaxants.

Stability of the LMA-ProSeal and standard laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions: a randomized crossover study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The LMA-ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is a new laryngeal mask airway with a modified cuff and drainage tube. We compared oropharyngeal leak pressure, intracuff pressure and anatomical position (assessed fibreoptically) for the Size 5 LMA-ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and the classic laryngeal mask airway in different head-neck positions and using different intracuff inflation volumes.

METHODS

Thirty paralysed anaesthetized adult male patients were studied. The LMA-ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and the classic laryngeal mask airway were inserted into each patient in random order. The oropharyngeal leak pressure, intracuff pressure, and anatomical position of the airway tube and drainage tube (LMA-ProSeal laryngeal mask airway only) were documented in four head and neck positions (neutral first, then flexion, extension and rotation in random order), and at 0-40 mL cuff volumes in the neutral position in 10 mL increments.

RESULTS

Compared with the neutral position, the oropharyngeal leak pressure for both the LMA-ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and the classic laryngeal mask airway was higher in flexion and rotation (all P < or = 0.02), but lower in extension (all P < or = 0.01). Changes in head-neck position did not alter the anatomical position of the airway tube or the drainage tube. The oropharyngeal leak pressure was always higher for the LMA-ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (all P < or = 0.005) and anatomical position better for the classic laryngeal mask airway (all P < or = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The anatomical position of the LMA-ProSeal and the classic laryngeal mask airway is stable in different head-neck positions, but head-neck flexion and rotation are associated with an increase, and head-neck extension a decrease, in oropharyngeal leak pressure and intracuff pressure. The Size 5 LMA-ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is capable of forming a more effective seal than the Size 5 classic laryngeal mask airway in males.

Breathing pattern and workload during automatic tube compensation, pressure support and T-piece trials in weaning patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Automatic tube compensation has been designed as a new ventilatory mode to compensate for the non-linear resistance of the endotracheal tube. The study investigated the effects of automatic tube compensation compared with breathing through a T-piece or pressure support during a trial of spontaneous breathing used for weaning patients from mechanical ventilation of the lungs.

METHODS

Twelve patients were studied who were ready for weaning after prolonged mechanical ventilation (10.2 +/- 8.4 days) due to acute respiratory failure. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were excluded. Thirty minutes of automatic tube compensation were compared with 30 min periods of 7 cmH2O pressure support and T-piece breathing. Breathing patterns and workload indices were measured at the end of each study period.

RESULTS

During T-piece breathing, the peak inspiratory flow rate (0.65 +/- 0.20 L s(-1)) and minute ventilation (8.9 +/- 2.7L min(-1)) were lower than during either pressure support (peak inspiratory flow rate 0.81 +/- 0.25 L s(-1) minute ventilation 10.2 +/- 2.3 L min(-1), respectively) or automatic tube compensation (peak inspiratory flow rate 0.75 +/- 0.26L s(-1); minute ventilation 10.8 +/- 2.7 L min(-1)). The pressure-time product as well as patients' work of breathing were comparable during automatic tube compensation (pressure-time product 214.5 +/- 104.6 cmH2O s(-1) min(-1), patient work of breathing 1.1 +/- 0.4 J L(-1)) and T-piece breathing (pressure-time product 208.3 +/- 121.6 cmH2O s(-1) min(-1), patient work of breathing 1.1 +/- 0.4 J L(-1)), whereas pressure support resulted in a significant decrease in workload indices (pressure-time product 121.2 +/- 64.1 cmH2O s(-1) min(-1), patient work of breathing 0.7 +/- 0.4 J L(-1)).

CONCLUSIONS

In weaning from mechanical lung ventilation, patients' work of breathing during spontaneous breathing trials is clearly reduced by the application of pressure support 7 cmH2O, whereas the workload during automatic tube compensation corresponded closely to the values during trials of breathing through a T-piece.

Anaesthetic agents in adult day case surgery

This study reports a review of all comparative published studies of adult day case anaesthesia in the English language up to December 2000. Ten databases were searched using appropriate keywords and data were extracted in a standardized fashion. One hundred-and-one published studies were examined. Recovery measurements were grouped as early, intermediate, late, psychomotor and adverse effects. With respect to induction of anaesthesia, propofol was superior to methohexital, etomidate and thiopental, but equal to sevoflurane and desflurane. Desflurane and sevoflurane were both superior to thiopental. There was no detectable difference between sevoflurane and isoflurane. With respect to the maintenance of anaesthesia, isoflurane and halothane were the worst. There were no significant differences between propofol, desflurane, sevoflurane and enflurane. Propofol is the induction agent of choice in day case patients. The use of a propofol infusion and avoidance of nitrous oxide may help to reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Prediction of difficult tracheal intubation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Preoperative bedside screening tests for difficult tracheal intubation may be neither sensitive nor specific enough for clinical use. The aim was to investigate if a combination of the Mallampati classification of the oropharyngeal view with either the thyromental or sternomental distance measurement improved the predictive value.

METHODS

A total of 212 (109 male, 103 female) non-obstetric surgical patients, aged >18 yr, undergoing elective surgical procedures requiring tracheal intubation were assessed preoperatively with respect to the oropharyngeal (modified Mallampati) classification, thyromental and sternomental distances. An experienced anaesthetist, blinded to the preoperative airway assessment, performed laryngoscopy and graded the view according to Cormack and Lehane's classification.

RESULTS

Twenty tracheal intubations (9%) were difficult as defined by a Cormack and Lehane Grade 3 or 4, or the requirement for a bougie in patients with Cormack and Lehane Grade 2. Used alone, the Mallampati oropharyngeal view, and thyromental and sternomental distances were associated with poor sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive values. Combining the Mallampati Class III or IV with either a thyromental distance <6.5cm or a sternomental distance <12.5cm decreased the sensitivity (from 40 to 25 and 20%, respectively), but maintained a negative predictive value of 93%. The specificity and positive predictive values increased from 89 and 27% respectively for Mallampati alone to 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that the Mallampati classification, in conjunction with measurement of the thyromental and sternomental distances, may be a useful routine screening test for preoperative prediction of difficult tracheal intubation.

Remifentanil versus alfentanil in total intravenous anaesthesia for day case surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

We assessed the intraoperative haemodynamic responses and recovery profiles of total intravenous anaesthesia with remifentanil and alfentanil for outpatient surgery.

METHODS

Patients in Group 1 (n = 20) received alfentanil 20 microg kg(-1) followed by 2 microg kg(-1) min(-1) intravenously; patients in Group 2 (n = 20) received remifentanil 1 microg kg(-1) followed by 0.5 microg kg(-1) min(-1) intravenously. Both groups then received propofol 2 mg kg(-1) followed by 9 mg kg(-1) h(-1) intravenously. Five minutes after skin incision, infusion rates were decreased, and at the end of surgery, all infusions were discontinued. Early recovery was assessed by the Aldrete score, whereas intermediate recovery was assessed with the postanaesthetic discharge scoring system (PADS).

RESULTS

Perioperative arterial pressure was similar in both groups; heart rate was lower in Group 2 (P < 0.05). The times to spontaneous and adequate respiration, response to verbal commands, extubation and times for Aldrete score > or = 9 were shorter in Group 2 patients (P < 0.05). Pain scores were higher in Group 2 patients (P < 0.05). Overall times for postanaesthetic discharge scores > or = 9 were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Early recovery of patients after day surgery is significantly shorter after total intravenous anaesthesia with remifentanil compared with that with alfentanil but postoperative pain management must be planned ahead.

Effects of different doses of oral ketamine for premedication of children

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

A need exists for a safe and effective oral preanaesthetic medication for use in children undergoing elective surgery. The study sought to define the dose of oral ketamine that would facilitate induction of anaesthesia without causing significant side-effects.

METHODS

We studied 80 children undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia who received oral ketamine 4, 6 or 8 mg kg(-1) in a prospective, randomized, double-blind placebo controlled study. We compared the reaction to separation from parents, transport to the operating room, the response to intravenous cannula insertion and application of an anaesthetic facemask, the induction of anaesthesia and recovery from anaesthesia.

RESULTS

In the group receiving ketamine 8 mg kg(-1), the children were significantly calmer than those of the other groups, and anaesthesia induction was more comfortable. Recovery from anaesthesia was longer in the group receiving ketamine 8 mg kg(-1) compared with the other groups, but no differences between the groups were observed after 2 h in the recovery room.

CONCLUSIONS

It is concluded that oral ketamine 8 mg kg(-1) is an effective oral premedication in inpatient children undergoing elective surgery.

Trendelenburg positioning after cardiac surgery: effects on intrathoracic blood volume index and cardiac performance

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The efficacy of the Trendelenburg position, a common first step to treat suspected hypovolaemia, remains controversial. We evaluated its haemodynamic effects on cardiac preload and performance in patients after cardiac surgery.

METHODS

Twelve patients undergoing mechanical ventilation of the lungs who demonstrated left ventricular 'kissing papillary muscles' by transoesophageal echocardiography, thus suggesting hypovolaemia, were positioned 30 degrees head down for 15 min immediately after cardiac surgery. Cardiac output by thermodilution, central venous pressure, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, left ventricular end-diastolic area by transoesophageal echocardiography and intrathoracic blood volume by thermo- and dye dilution were determined before, during and after this Trendelenburg manoeuvre.

RESULTS

Trendelenburg's manoeuvre was associated with increases in central venous pressure (9 +/- 2 to 12 +/- 3 mmHg) and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (8 +/- 2 to 11 +/- 3 mmHg). The intrathoracic blood volume index increased slightly (dye dilution from 836 +/- 129 to 872 +/- 112 mL m(-2); thermodilution from 823 +/- 129 to 850 +/- 131 mL m(-2)) as did the left ventricular end-diastolic area index (7.5 +/- 2.1 to 8.1 +/- 1.7 cm2 m(-2)), whereas mean arterial pressure and the cardiac index did not change significantly. After supine repositioning, the cardiac index decreased significantly below baseline (3.0 +/- 0.6 versus 3.5 +/- 0.8 L min(-1) m(-2)) as did mean arterial pressure (76 +/- 12 versus 85 +/- 11 mmHg), central venous pressure (8 +/- 2 mmHg) and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (6 +/- 4 mmHg). The intrathoracic blood volume index and left ventricular end-diastolic area index did not differ significantly from baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Trendelenburg's manoeuvre caused only a slight increase of preload volume, despite marked increases in cardiac-filling pressures, without significantly improving cardiac performance.

Anaesthetic and haemodynamic effects of continuous spinal versus continuous epidural anaesthesia with prilocaine

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To compare, using prilocaine, the effects of continuous spinal anaesthesia (CSA) and continuous epidural anaesthesia (CEA) on haemodynamic stability as well as the quality of anaesthesia and recovery in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate gland.

METHODS

Thirty patients (>60 yr) were randomized into two groups. Prilocaine, 2% 40 mg, was given to patients in the CSA group, and prilocaine 1% 150mg was given to patients in the CEA group. Incremental doses were given if the level of sensory block was lower than T10 or if needed during surgery.

RESULTS

There was a significant decrease in mean arterial pressure in Group CEA compared with Group CSA (P < 0.01). The decrease in heart rate in Group CSA occurred 10 min after the first local anaesthetic administration and continued through the operation (P < 0.05). The level of sensory anaesthesia was similar in both groups. The times to reach the level of T10 and the upper level of sensory blockade (Tmax) were 18.0 +/- 4.7 and 25.3 +/- 7.0 min in Groups CSA and CEA, respectively, and were significantly longer in Group CEA. The duration of anaesthesia was 76.8 +/- 4min and was shorter in Group CSA (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal or epidural anaesthesia administered continuously was reliable in elderly patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate. Continuous spinal anaesthesia had a more rapid onset of action, produced more effective sensory and motor blockade and had a shorter recovery period. Prilocaine appeared to be a safe local anaesthetic for use with either continuous spinal anaesthesia or continuous epidural anaesthesia.

Cortical activity assessed by Narcotrend in relation to haemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation at different stages of cortical suppression and reflex control

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Many anaesthesiologists still interpret haemodynamic responses as signs of insufficient cortical suppression. The aim was to illustrate how haemodynamics may only poorly reflect the level of cortical suppression and that electroencephalographic monitoring could indicate different relationships between cortical effects and haemodynamics.

METHODS

Anaesthesia was induced with thiopental (7 mg kg(-1)), and fentanyl (2 microg kg(-1)) with succinylcholine (1.5 mg kg(-1)) for neuromuscular blockade in the 11 patients of Group 1. In Group 2 (n = 15), thiopental (7 mg kg(-1)) and succinylcholine (1.5 mg kg(-1)) were given. In Group 3, the patients (n = 13) received thiopental (7 mg kg(-1)), fentanyl (2 microg kg(-1)) and cisatracurium (0.1 mg kg(-1)), and they were intubated 3 min later than the patients in Groups 1 and 2. We determined conventional electroencephalographic (EEG) variables and classified 14 EEG stages in real-time ranging from A (= 1), indicating full wakefulness, to F1 (= 14), at profound cortical suppression.

RESULTS

All groups had profound cortical suppression 45 s after thiopental administration, which rapidly decreased (EEG stage, 11 (6-13) versus 7 (2-13) at 4 min, P < 0.0001). Decreasing EEG stages were associated with increasing SEF 95, relative alpha and beta power and decreasing relative delta power. During tracheal intubation, profound cortical suppression remained unchanged in Groups 1 and 2. In Group 3, cortical suppression had decreased before laryngoscopy (P < 0.005). In Group 2, 11 patients had heart rate responses to tracheal intubation, whereas only two responded in Group 1 (P = 0.015) and three in Group 3 (P = 0.02). Thirteen patients in Group 2 had arterial pressure responses, and five in Group 1 (P = 0.038). Circulatory responses did not differ between Groups 1 and 3.

CONCLUSIONS

Electroencephalographic monitoring was suitable to indicate in real-time that haemodynamics only poorly reflect rapidly changing levels of cortical suppression, and how haemodynamics and cortical activity depend on the applied combination of hypnotic and analgesic drugs during anaesthesia induction with thiopental.

Increasing the injection volume by dilution improves the onset of motor blockade, but not sensory blockade of ropivacaine for brachial plexus block

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Ropivacaine used for axillary plexus block provides effective motor and sensory blockade. Varying clinical dosage recommendations exist. Increasing the dosage by increasing the concentration showed no improvement in onset. We compared the behaviour of a constant dose of ropivacaine 150 mg diluted in a 30, 40 or 60 mL injection volume for axillary (brachial) plexus block.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study on patients undergoing elective hand surgery was conducted in a community hospital. Three groups of patients with a constant dose of ropivacaine 150 mg, diluted in 30,40 or 60 mL NaCl 0.9%, for axillary plexus blockade were compared for onset times of motor and sensory block onset by assessing muscle strength, two-point discrimination and constant-touch sensation.

RESULTS

Increasing the injection volume of ropivacaine 150 mg to 60 mL led to a faster onset of motor block, but not of sensory block, in axillary plexus block, compared with 30 or 40 mL volumes of injection.

CONCLUSIONS

The data show that the onset of motor, but not of sensory block, is accelerated by increasing the injection volume to 60 mL using ropivacaine 150 mg for axillary plexus block. This may be useful for a more rapid determination of whether the brachial plexus block is effective. However, when performing surgery in the area of the block, sensory block onset seems more important.

Tracheal intubation conditions and cardiovascular effects after modified rapid-sequence induction with sevoflurane-rapacuronium versus propofol-rapacuronium

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To compare intubation conditions and hemodynamic effects resulting from rapid-sequence induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane-rapacuronium and propofol-rapacuronium.

DESIGN

Randomized, blinded study.

SETTING

Operating suites of a large university-affiliated medical center.

PATIENTS

40 ASA physical status I and II adult patients without airway abnormalities who were scheduled for elective surgery requiring endotracheal intubation.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly allocated to receive either sevoflurane inhalational induction (Group 1) or propofol (2 mg/kg) intravenous induction (Group 2). Group 1 patients were coached on how to perform vital capacity breathing and the anesthesia machine was primed with sevoflurane 8%, N2O:O2 3.5:1.5 L/min. In both groups, when loss of consciousness was established, rapacuronium 1.5 mg/kg was administered. After 50 seconds, an anesthesiologist blinded to the study entered the room and attempted laryngoscopy and intubation.

MEASUREMENTS

Intubation conditions were graded as excellent, good, poor, or impossible according to Good Clinical Research Practice (GCRP) criteria. Arterial blood pressure and heart rate changes accompanying both induction techniques were also monitored and recorded.

MAIN RESULTS

All patients were successfully intubated within 60 seconds. Clinically acceptable intubating conditions (excellent or good scores) were obtained in 19 of 20 Group 1 patients and in 19 of 20 Group 2 patients. Moderate tachycardia was encountered in both groups and mild systolic hypotension in the Group 2 patients. There were no complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Modified rapid-sequence inhalational induction using sevoflurane and rapacuronium produced clinically acceptable intubation conditions within 60 seconds of muscle relaxant administration. The intubation conditions were similar to those produced after intravenous propofol and rapacuronium.

Comparison of rocuronium and suxamethonium for rapid tracheal intubation in children

BACKGROUND

The purpose of our study was to determine whether a smaller dose of rocuronium than previously reported could provide similar intubating conditions to suxamethonium during rapid-sequence induction of anaesthesia in children.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty ASA I, unpremedicated children, aged 1-10 years, who were undergoing elective surgery, were randomized into three groups to receive rocuronium 0.6 mg.kg-1, rocuronium 0.9 mg.kg-1 or suxamethonium 1.5 mg.kg-1. The study was double-blinded, anaesthesia and timing of injection was standardized to alfentanil 10 microg.kg-1, thiopentone 5 mg.kg-1 and the study drug. Intubation was attempted at 30 s after injection of neuromuscular relaxant and intubating conditions graded as excellent, good, poor or impossible.

RESULTS

All 120 children were successfully intubated within 60 s without need for a second attempt after administration of neuromuscular relaxant. Differences between suxamethonium and rocuronium 0.6 mg.kg-1 and between the two doses of rocuronium were statistically significant (P=0.016 and 0.007, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Rocuronium 0.9 mg.kg-1 provides similar intubating conditions to suxamethonium 1.5 mg.kg-1 during modified rapid-sequence induction using alfentanil and thiopentone in children (P=0.671). Rocuronium 0.6 mg.kg-1 was inadequate.

Rapid sequence induction: a national survey of practice

We performed a national postal survey exploring anaesthetists' practice in rapid sequence induction. All respondents used pre-oxygenation, although the technique employed, and its reliability, varied. Thiopental and succinylcholine, given after waiting for signs of loss of consciousness, were the most widely used drugs for rapid sequence induction. Propofol and rocuronium were used by more than a third of respondents, and most respondents (75%) also routinely administered an opioid. Cricoid pressure was used universally but the practice of its application varied widely. The commonest aids used if intubation was difficult were the gum elastic bougie, the long laryngoscope blade and the laryngeal mask. After failed intubation, approximately half of respondents would maintain the supine position. Failure to intubate at rapid sequence intubation had been seen by 45% of respondents but harm was uncommon. In contrast, 28% had seen regurgitation, which frequently led to considerable harm and to three deaths. In spite of this, practice of a failed intubation drill was uncommon (15%) and anaesthetic assistants were rarely known to practice application of cricoid pressure. Consultants were less likely than trainees to use rocuronium as a muscle relaxant, and more likely to choose morphine if administering an opioid. They were less likely to practice a failed intubation drill. Other aspects of practice varied little between grades. This survey suggests that many anaesthetists do not follow best practice when performing a rapid sequence induction.

Comparison of intubating conditions following propofol and succinylcholine with propofol and remifentanil 2 micrograms kg-1 or 4 micrograms kg-1

We evaluated the intubating conditions, haemodynamic responses and duration of apnoea in 60 healthy adult patients after propofol 2 mg kg-1 combined with either a bolus of remifentanil 2 micrograms kg-1 or 4 micrograms kg-1, or succinylcholine 1 mg kg-1. Patients intubated following remifentanil showed dose-dependent intubating conditions, similar at 4 micrograms kg-1 to the conditions produced with succinylcholine. Post-induction mean arterial pressure decreased from baseline values by 21% (P < 0.0001), 28% (P < 0.0001) and 8% (P > 0.05) in the remifentanil 2 micrograms kg-1, remifentanil 4 micrograms kg-1 and succinylcholine 1 mg kg-1 groups, respectively. The mean (SD) duration of apnoea following induction was 9.3 (2.6) min and 12.8 (2.9) min in the remifentanil 2 micrograms kg-1 and 4 micrograms kg-1 groups, and 6.0 (0.9) min in the succinylcholine group (P < 0.001 between groups).

Rapid tracheal intubation with large-dose rocuronium: a probability-based approach

There are situations in anesthesia in which it may be desirable to achieve rapid tracheal intubation with perfect conditions, i.e., no coughing or straining. To determine the dose of rocuronium that gives a high probability of achieving perfect conditions for rapid (within 60 s) tracheal intubation, we administered a range of doses of rocuronium, some larger than used previously. Sixty adults, anesthetized with thiopental 4 mg/kg IV and alfentanil 10 microg/kg IV, received rocuronium 0.4 to 2.0 mg/kg IV. We used logistic regression to define the relationship of rocuronium dose to probability of achieving perfect intubation conditions. We estimated the doses giving 90% and 95% probability of achieving perfect intubation and used resampling to determine confidence limits for these estimates. Rocuronium 1.85 and 2.33 mg/kg gave, respectively, 90% and 95% probability of perfect intubation conditions. The confidence limits (5th and 95th percentile) for these estimates were 1.15 to 2.31 and 1.23 to 3.22 mg/kg, respectively. In conclusion, it is possible to achieve perfect intubation conditions with large doses of rocuronium, but the long duration of action and expense may limit the usefulness of the technique.

IMPLICATIONS

We found that it is possible to have a 90% probability of achieving perfect conditions for rapid tracheal intubation with large (up to 2.0 mg/kg) doses of rocuronium. These large doses of rocuronium may be useful in, for instance, head trauma or open globe injuries if succinylcholine is contraindicated.

Dosing study of remifentanil and propofol for tracheal intubation without the use of muscle relaxants

Sixty ASA I and II patients, premedicated with midazolam, were administered propofol 2 mg x kg-1 and remifentanil 3 microg x kg-1 (group R3), remifentanil 4 microg x kg-1 (group R4) and remifentanil 5 microg x kg-1 (group R5). Laryngoscopy and intubation were performed 1 min after the administration of the study drugs and the intubating conditions were assessed. Good to excellent conditions were observed in 12 patients in group R3 compared with 19 patients each in groups R4 and R5 (p = 0.004). Significant reductions in mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) after administration of the study drug were observed in each group, p < 0.01. There was, however, no difference in mean MAP and HR between the three groups at all time points. We conclude that remifentanil 4-5 microg x kg-1 may reliably provide good to excellent conditions for tracheal intubation when administered after propofol 2 mg x kg-1.

Comparison of remifentanil with alfentanil or suxamethonium following propofol anaesthesia for tracheal intubation

Sixty ASA physical status I and II, premedicated patients were administered propofol 2 mg x kg-1 and remifentanil 2 microg x kg-1 (group R), alfentanil 50 microg x kg-1 (group A) or suxamethonium 1 mg x kg-1 (group S) as a rapid bolus. One minute after study drug administration, tracheal intubation was performed. Intubation conditions were then scored. Excellent or good conditions were observed in only 35% in group R compared with groups S and A (100% and 85%, respectively; p < 0.001). The haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation was blunted in groups R and A compared with group S (p < 0.001). The mean heart rate in groups R and A was significantly lower than group S (p < 0.001). We conclude that remifentanil 2 microg x kg-1 given as a rapid bolus will not produce intubating conditions as good as those obtained with alfentanil 50 microg x kg-1 or suxamethonium 1 mg x kg-1 if administered after propofol 2 mg x kg-1.

[Intratracheal intubation without muscle relaxant with the use of remifentanil-propofol]

OBJECTIVES

To assess tracheal intubation conditions after induction of anaesthesia with remifentanil and propofol, using itemized scoring criteria.

STUDY DESIGN

Clinical, prospective, open, non comparative trial.

PATIENTS

One hundred consecutive patients undergoing surgery not requiring muscle relaxation, during the study period extended over 12 months.

METHODS

After premedication with lorazepam (2 mg) the day before and hydroxyzine (100 mg) one hour before surgery, anaesthesia was induced with remifentanil administered continuously with a syringe pump at a rate of 1.20 +/- 0.06 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 and propofol (3 mg.kg-1 IV bolus). The trachea was intubated two minutes later and mouth opening, glottis exposure, glottis opening, movements, additional anaesthetic agents and chest rigidity were recorded.

RESULTS

Intubation conditions were excellent in 87% of patients, and the tube was inserted rapidly, within two minutes. However in 38% of patients the cuff inflation caused cough. In 13%, glottis opening was delayed and intubation required three minutes. A major decrease of arterial pressure and heart rate was recorded in 9 and 6% of patients respectively.

CONCLUSION

Induction of anaesthesia using remifentanil and propofol allows satisfactory tracheal intubation without a muscle relaxant. However this technique is contraindicated: a) in patients with a full stomach, as intubation is not always successful at the first attempt; b) in patients scheduled to undergo neurosurgery or ophthalmic surgery, as tracheal intubation may elicit cough, increasing intra-cranial and intra-ocular pressure; c) in patients in poor circulatory status, as it decreases significantly arterial pressure and heart rate.

Comparison of sevoflurane and propofol with rocuronium for modified rapid-sequence induction of anaesthesia

We compared the use of sevoflurane and propofol with three different doses of rocuronium for modified rapid-sequence induction of anaesthesia. One hundred and forty adult patients were randomly allocated to have a rapid-sequence intravenous induction with propofol 2-3 mg.kg-1 (group P) or an inhalational induction with sevoflurane 8% in oxygen, using a vital capacity technique (group S). Following loss of the eyelash reflex, cricoid pressure was applied and 20 patients in each group were administered rocuronium 0.3 (groups P/0.3 and S/0.3), 0.45 (groups P/0.45 and S/0.45) or 0.6 (groups P/0.6 and S/0.6) mg.kg-1. An additional 10 patients in each group received only saline placebo in place of the muscle relaxant (groups P/Saline and S/Saline). Laryngoscopy was started 60 s later and intubating conditions evaluated by a blinded anaesthetist according to a standard scoring system. Intubating conditions were acceptable in one patient and no patient, respectively, following induction with sevoflurane and propofol without the muscle relaxant. The conditions were acceptable in 30, 55 and 90% of subjects with sevoflurane induction, and in 45, 80 and 90% of subjects with propofol induction following 0.3, 0.45 and 0.6 mg.kg-1 of rocuronium, respectively (no significant difference for each dose of rocuronium). The present study shows that intubating conditions during a rapid-sequence induction using rocuronium 0.6 mg.kg-1 following induction of anaesthesia with sevoflurane or propofol are similar.

Tracheal intubation without neuromuscular blockade in children: a comparison of propofol combined either with alfentanil or remifentanil

Forty healthy children, aged between two and 12 years of age undergoing elective surgery where the anaesthetic technique involved tracheal intubation followed by spontaneous ventilation were studied. Induction of anaesthesia was with either alfentanil 15 micrograms.kg-1 or remifentanil 1 microgram.kg-1 followed by propofol 4 mg.kg-1 to which lignocaine 0.2 mg.kg-1 had been added. Intubating conditions were graded on a four point scale for ease of laryngoscopy, vocal cord position, degree of coughing, jaw relaxation and limb movement. All children were successfully intubated at the first attempt. There were no significant differences in the assessments of intubating conditions between the two groups. Arterial blood pressure and heart changes were similar in the two groups with both alfentanil and remifentanil attenuating the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation. The time taken to resumption of spontaneous ventilation was similar in both groups.

Pain on injection of propofol

Pain on injection of propofol is a common problem, the cause of which remains unknown. The chemical properties and preparation of propofol, proposed mechanisms for the cause of the pain and clinical strategies to prevent pain on injection of propofol are reviewed in the hope of shedding some light on the subject.