Comparative beta-adrenoceptor blocking effects and pharmacokinetics of penbutolol and propranolol in man

Extracorporeal treatment for poisoning to beta-adrenergic antagonists: systematic review and recommendations from the EXTRIP workgroup

BACKGROUND

β-adrenergic antagonists (BAAs) are used to treat cardiovascular disease such as ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, dysrhythmias, and hypertension. Poisoning from BAAs can lead to severe morbidity and mortality. We aimed to determine the utility of extracorporeal treatments (ECTRs) in BAAs poisoning.

METHODS

We conducted systematic reviews of the literature, screened studies, extracted data, and summarized findings following published EXTRIP methods.

RESULTS

A total of 76 studies (4 in vitro and 2 animal experiments, 1 pharmacokinetic simulation study, 37 pharmacokinetic studies on patients with end-stage kidney disease, and 32 case reports or case series) met inclusion criteria. Toxicokinetic or pharmacokinetic data were available on 334 patients (including 73 for atenolol, 54 for propranolol, and 17 for sotalol). For intermittent hemodialysis, atenolol, nadolol, practolol, and sotalol were assessed as dialyzable; acebutolol, bisoprolol, and metipranolol were assessed as moderately dialyzable; metoprolol and talinolol were considered slightly dialyzable; and betaxolol, carvedilol, labetalol, mepindolol, propranolol, and timolol were considered not dialyzable. Data were available for clinical analysis on 37 BAA poisoned patients (including 9 patients for atenolol, 9 for propranolol, and 9 for sotalol), and no reliable comparison between the ECTR cohort and historical controls treated with standard care alone could be performed. The EXTRIP workgroup recommends against using ECTR for patients severely poisoned with propranolol (strong recommendation, very low quality evidence). The workgroup offered no recommendation for ECTR in patients severely poisoned with atenolol or sotalol because of apparent balance of risks and benefits, except for impaired kidney function in which ECTR is suggested (weak recommendation, very low quality of evidence). Indications for ECTR in patients with impaired kidney function include refractory bradycardia and hypotension for atenolol or sotalol poisoning, and recurrent torsade de pointes for sotalol. Although other BAAs were considered dialyzable, clinical data were too limited to develop recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

BAAs have different properties affecting their removal by ECTR. The EXTRIP workgroup assessed propranolol as non-dialyzable. Atenolol and sotalol were assessed as dialyzable in patients with kidney impairment, and the workgroup suggests ECTR in patients severely poisoned with these drugs when aforementioned indications are present.

Development and Evaluation of a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Drug-Disease Model of Propranolol for Suggesting Model Informed Dosing in Liver Cirrhosis Patients

AIM

The study was aimed to understand the underlying causes for the differences in propranolol pharmacokinetics (PK) between healthy and cirrhosis populations by using a systematic whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model-building approach for suggesting model informed propranolol dosing in liver cirrhosis patients with different stages of disease severity.

METHODS

A whole-body PBPK model was developed by using population simulator PK-Sim® by using reported physicochemical and clinical data for propranolol in healthy and liver cirrhosis populations. The model evaluation was done by visual verification and comparison of PK parameters using their observed/predicted ratios (Robs/pred).

RESULTS

The developed model has effectively described the disposition of propranolol after intravenous and oral application in healthy and liver cirrhosis populations. All the model predictions were comparable to the observed clinical data and the Robs/pred for all the PK parameters were within a 2-fold range. A significant increase in plasma concentration of propranolol and decrease in drug clearance was observed in progressive stages of liver cirrhosis. The developed model after evaluation with the reported clinical PK data was used for suggesting model informed propranolol dosing in different stages of liver cirrhosis based on systemic unbound drug concentration.

CONCLUSION

The developed PBPK model has successfully described propranolol PK in healthy and cirrhosis populations after IV and oral administration. The evaluated PBPK propranolol-cirrhosis model can have many implications in predicting propranolol dosing in liver cirrhosis patients with different stages of disease severity.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Propranolol Hydrochloride: A Review

BACKGROUND

Nobel laureate Sir James Black's molecule, propranolol, still has broad potential in cardiovascular diseases, infantile haemangiomas and anxiety. A comprehensive and systematic review of the literature for the summarization of pharmacokinetic parameters would be effective to explore the new safe uses of propranolol in different scenarios, without exposing humans and using virtual-human modeling approaches.

OBJECTIVE

This review encompasses physicochemical properties, pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interaction data of propranolol collected from various studies.

METHODS

Clinical pharmacokinetic studies on propranolol were screened using Medline and Google Scholar databases. Eighty-three clinical trials, in which pharmacokinetic profiles and plasma time concentration were available after oral or IV administration, were included in the review.

RESULTS

The study depicts that propranolol is well absorbed after oral administration. It has dose-dependent bioavailability, and a 2-fold increase in dose results in a 2.5-fold increase in the area under the curve, a 1.3-fold increase in the time to reach maximum plasma concentration and finally, 2.2 and 1.8-fold increase in maximum plasma concentration in both immediate and long-acting formulations, respectively. Propranolol is a substrate of CYP2D6, CYP1A2 and CYP2C19, retaining potential pharmacokinetic interactions with co-administered drugs. Age, gender, race and ethnicity do not alter its pharmacokinetics. However, in renal and hepatic impairment, it needs a dose adjustment.

CONCLUSION

Physiochemical and pooled pharmacokinetic parameters of propranolol are beneficial to establish physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling among the diseased population.

Influence of sonophoresis and chemical penetration enhancers on percutaneous transport of penbutolol sulfate

The effect of ultrasound and chemical penetration enhancers on transcutaneous flux of penbutolol sulfate across split-thickness porcine skin was investigated. Penbutolol sulfate is a potent, noncardioselective beta-blocker, which is used for the management of hypertension. The drug is one of the most lipid soluble of the β-adrenoceptor antagonists used clinically. It has an n-octanol/pH 7.4 buffer partition coefficient of 179 compared to a value of 22 for propranolol. The amount of penbutolol sulfate transported across the skin is low. In this project, we studied the effect of sonophoresis and chemical penetration enhancers on transdermal delivery of penbutolol sulfate. Low-frequency sonophoresis at a frequency of 20 kHz increased transcutaneous flux of penbutolol sulfate by 3.5-fold (27.37 ± μg cm^-2 h^-1) compared to passive delivery (7.82 ± 1.72 μg cm^-2 h^-1). We also investigated the effect of 50% ethanol, 1% limonene and 2% isopropyl myristate (IPM) on transcutaneous permeation of penbutolol sulfate. IPM, ethanol and limonene at the concentration of 1%, 50% and 2%, respectively, increased the steady-state flux values of penbutolol sulfate 2.2- (17.07 ± 3.24 μg cm^-2 h^-1), 2.6 - (19.40 ± 6.40 μg cm^-2 h^-1) and 3.4-times (26.38 ± 5.01 μg cm^-2 h^-1) compared to passive delivery (7.76 ± 2.9 μg cm^-2 h^-1). The results demonstrate that although there were slight increases in flux values, ultrasound, ethanol, limonene and IPM did not significantly enhance the transdermal delivery of penbutolol sulfate. Future studies will examine ways of optimizing sonophoretic and chemical enhancer parameters to achieve flux enhancement.

High-performance liquid chromatography with chemiluminescence detection of penbutolol and its hydroxylated metabolite in rat plasma

This paper describes a new method of high-performance liquid chromatography with chemiluminescence detection for the analysis of penbutolol (PB) and its main metabolite, 4-hydroxy penbutolol (4-OH PB) in rat plasma. 4-Dimethylaminosulfonyl-7-(N-chloroformylmethyl-N-methyl) amino-2,1,3-benzoxadiazole (DBD-COCl) was used as a fluorogenic labeling reagent. A mixture of hydrogen peroxide and bis[4-nitro-2-(3,6,9-trioxadecyloxycarbonyl)phenyl]oxalate (TDPO) in acetonitrile was used as a post-column chemiluminogenic reagent. The derivatives of PB and 4-OH PB with DBD-COCI were separated by isocratic effluent with 0.01 M imidazole buffer (pH 7.0)-acetonitrile within 10 min. The detection limits of the proposed method for PB and 4-OH PB were 9.9 and 15 fmol on column, respectively. After intravenous administration of PB in rats, its plasma concentration profiles of PB and 4-OH PB were determined by the proposed method. PB was demonstrated to be rapidly metabolized to 4-OH PB at the same rate as cardiac output.

Penbutolol and carteolol: two new beta-adrenergic blockers with partial agonism

Penbutolol and carteolol are two new long acting, nonselective beta-adrenergic blockers which have been approved for the treatment of systemic hypertension. Both drugs have intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (partial agonist activity), however, less than that seen with pindolol. They appear to cause less resting bradycardia than propranolol, have no effect on lipids and lipoproteins, and have favorable side effect profiles.

Penbutolol: a new beta-adrenergic blocking agent

Penbutolol is a new beta-adrenergic blocking drug approved for the treatment of hypertension. It is a noncardioselective beta-blocker and has intrinsic sympathomimetic activity. The drug is approximately four times as potent as propranolol when taken orally. After oral administration, it is almost completely absorbed and peak plasma concentrations are achieved within 1.0 to 2.25 hours. Penbutolol is extensively metabolized in the liver by hydroxylation and glucuronidation. Active metabolites have not been identified. Only four to six percent of the parent drug is eliminated in the urine unchanged and dosage adjustment in renal insufficiency does not appear to be necessary. The mean terminal half-life of penbutolol is 17.6 to 26.5 hours. The duration of the hypotensive effect is approximately 24 hours. Current dosing guidelines recommend initiating therapy with 20 mg/d administered once a day. Optimum hypotensive effect occurs at dosages of 20-40 mg/d with little additional benefit observed above this range. Penbutolol appears to be well tolerated. The adverse effect profile is similar to other beta-blockers.

Usefulness of penbutolol for systemic hypertension. Penbutolol Research Group

Dose-response relations with penbutolol--a beta-adrenergic blocking agent--were evaluated in a double-blind multiclinic study conducted in 302 outpatients with mild to moderate hypertension (untreated supine diastolic blood pressure [BP] greater than or equal to 95 and less than or equal to 115 mm Hg). Penbutolol was administered once daily in 10, 20 or 40 mg doses for 6 weeks and compared with placebo. Mean declines from baseline in supine diastolic BP were comparable in the 3 penbutolol treatment groups and significantly superior to placebo (p less than 0.05). A significant difference between penbutolol dosage groups was observed only for supine systolic BP; the mean decline at 20 mg/day was significantly larger than that at 10 mg/day (p less than 0.05). Maximum BP response developed in approximately 4 weeks at 10 mg/day and in 2 weeks at the higher dosages. Decline in mean heart rate after 6 weeks of penbutolol therapy significantly exceeded placebo only at 40 mg/day (7.2 vs 2.5 beats/min, p less than 0.05). Treatment was well-tolerated and discontinued because of adverse effects in only 7 patients receiving penbutolol and 3 receiving placebo. The lack of significant bradycardia and the low incidence of other troublesome adverse effects are potential advantages during antihypertensive therapy with penbutolol. With rapid onset of effect and good efficacy and tolerability, the 20 mg once-daily dose appears to be optimum for therapy with this new agent.

Evaluation of the natriuretic and beta-adrenoceptor-blocking effects of tienoxolol in normal volunteers

The beta-adrenoceptor blocking and diuretic properties of tienoxolol (150 mg and 300 mg) were investigated and compared to those of a placebo in a double-blind, cross-over trial in six healthy volunteers. Heart rate (HR), systolic and diastolic blood pressures, peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) at rest and during vigorous exercise, plasma renin activity (PRA) and aldosterone levels at rest, and diuresis and urinary electrolyte excretion values were measured before and at intervals up to 24 h after oral administration of the drugs. In addition, the clearances of electrolytes, uric acid, and creatinine were calculated, as well as the fractional sodium excretion (Fe Na%) before and 4 h and 24 h after drug intake. Finally, tienoxolol plasma levels were measured. Tienoxolol significantly and dose-dependently reduced exercise-induced tachycardia. This effect started 1 h after drug administration, peaked between 4 h and 6 h (-12% and -17% from control values at 150 mg and 300 mg, respectively), and lasted at least 12 h. Resting HR was decreased at 300 mg (P less than 0.05), PRA was decreased at both doses (P less than 0.05), but PEFR was not drug-affected. 24-h cumulative sodium excretion was increased (+24% at 150 mg [NS], +38% at 300 mg [P less than 0.01]) as compared to placebo, and Fe Na% did not change, regardless of the dose administered. 24-h cumulative diuresis was moderately increased by tienoxolol (NS), whereas creatinine clearance rose after the 300-mg dose, suggesting that tienoxolol might increase glomerular filtration rate. Plasma aldosterone levels remained unchanged. Finally, the elimination half-life of tienoxolol was 7.5 h. Thus, in healthy volunteers, tienoxolol behaves as an early acting and relatively long-lasting selective beta 1-adrenoceptor blocking drug endowed with significant natriuretic properties.

Penbutolol: pharmacokinetics, effect on exercise tachycardia, and in vitro inhibition of radioligand binding

The pharmacokinetics of penbutolol 40 mg, its reduction in exercise-induced tachycardia, and the in vitro inhibition of radioligand binding to beta-adrenoceptors by plasma have been investigated in 7 healthy volunteers. The peak penbutolol concentration of 285 ng/ml was observed 1.2 h after administration, and the maximum of 4'-OH-penbutolol of 4.76 ng/ml was found after 1.64 h. Penbutolol was detected for up to 48 h, and 4'-OH-penbutolol dropped below the limit of detection after about 10 h. The terminal plasma concentration of penbutolol declined with an average half-life of 19 h. The maximum reduction in exercise-induced tachycardia was 33 beats/min 2.6 h after taking penbutolol. There was still a significant reduction of about 7 beats/min after 48 h. This effect could be adequately explained by the concentration-time course of penbutolol in combination with Clark's model of the concentration-effect relationship. Antagonist activity in plasma caused 91% inhibition of radioligand binding in vitro to beta 2-adrenoceptors on rat reticulocyte membranes 1.6 h after intake of penbutolol. By 48 h after intake, radioligand binding was still significantly inhibited (23%). The in vitro inhibition of radioligand binding by plasma showed a linear correlation with the reduction in exercise-induced tachycardia for all phases of the workload. The time course of the reduction in heart rate was completely explained by the in vitro inhibition of radioligand binding. However, it was not possible to explain the in vitro inhibition of radioligand binding by the concentration-time course of penbutolol using a simple competition model, although both variables were based on the same sampling site. When the in vitro inhibition of radioligand binding was plotted against the penbutolol concentration at the same sampling times (with both variables transformed to multiples of the apparent inhibition constant) the discrepancy became even more apparent as time-related counterclockwise hysteresis. None of the known metabolites of penbutolol can explain the discrepancy between the penbutolol concentration and the inhibition of radioligand binding in vitro. It appears that an other active metabolite is formed, which contributes to the effect in vitro and in vivo and so can explain the observed discrepancy.

Studies on the stereoisomers of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists in conscious A-V blocked dogs

Atrial and ventricular chronotropic effects of the individual stereoisomers of propranolol, pindolol, metoprolol and penbutolol were studied in conscious dogs with chronic atrio-ventricular (A-V) block. Ventricular beta-adrenoceptor blocking activity was assessed for all drugs against isoprenaline under the same experimental conditions. At low doses, the stereoisomers of propranolol and penbutolol decreased atrial rate, whereas those of pindolol and metoprolol produced an increase. At higher doses, all drugs increased atrial rate. All drugs decreased ventricular rate dose-dependently except (+)-pindolol. Relative ventricular beta-blocking potencies of the (-)-isomers of propranolol, pindolol, metoprolol and penbutolol were respectively 38, 21, greater than 43 and 31 times higher than those of their corresponding (+)-isomers. In addition, beta-blocking potencies of (-)- and (+)-pindolol were respectively 60 and 120 times higher, those of (-)- and (+)-penbutolol 7 and 8 times higher and those of (-)- and (+)-metoprolol 4 and greater than 4 times weaker than those of (-)- and (+)-propranolol. At comparable levels of ventricular beta-adrenoceptor blockade, (-)-pindolol and (-)-metoprolol were more potent in producing ventricular bradycardia than their respective (+)-isomers, whereas (-)- and (+)-propranolol and (-)- and (+)-penbutolol were equiactive. In addition, regardless of which isomer was being studied, the order of ventricular bradycardiac potencies, at comparable levels of beta-adrenoceptor blockade, was metoprolol greater than propranolol greater than penbutolol greater than pindolol. In addition, regardless of which isomer was being studied, the order of ventricular bradycardiac potencies, at comparable levels of beta-adrenoceptor blockade, was metoprolol > propranolol > penbutolol >pindolol. 5 These results show that antagonism of beta-adrenoceptors in the ventricle is at least partly responsible for the ventricular bradycardiac effect produced by these drugs, but also that some other factor, apparently distinct from the membrane stabilizing activity, is involved, suggesting the existence of some other as yet unknown pharmacological property of the beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs, especially evident in metoprolol. Finally, these results demonstrate that the intrinsic sympathomimetic activity exhibited by some of these drugs attenuate their bradycardiac effect.

Measurement of penbutolol and 4-hydroxypenbutolol in plasma or serum by HPLC

A simple HPLC method for penbutolol and 4-hydroxypenbutolol assay has been developed. Plasma or serum (200 microliters) is vortex-mixed (30 s) with Tris solution (2 M, pH 10.6) containing an internal standard (50 microliters) and methyl t-butyl ether (200 microliters). After centrifugation, the extract (100 microliters) is analysed using an unmodified silica column (250 x 5 mm ID) and iso-octane-methanol-methyl t-butyl ether (55:25:20) containing ammonium perchlorate (10 mM, pH 5.7) as eluent and with fluorescence detection. No interference has been encountered and the limit of accurate measurement for both compounds is 5 micrograms/l.

Beta-adrenoceptor blocking effects and plasma levels of bornaprolol and propranolol in man

The beta-adrenoceptor blocking effects and pharmacokinetics of bornaprolol (FM 24), a new beta-adrenoceptor blocking agent, have been compared with those of propranolol and a placebo in a double-blind trial in 6 healthy volunteers. Heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressures and peak expiratory flow rate were measured at rest and at the end of 3 min vigorous exercise on a bicycle ergometer, before and 2,24 and 48 h after single oral doses of bornaprolol (120, 240 and 480 mg) and propranolol (40, 80 and 160 mg). Plasma renin activity at rest and the plasma concentrations of the two drugs were determined. Bornaprolol significantly reduced resting heart rate, dose-dependently lowered exercise-induced tachycardia and decreased peak expiratory flow rate and plasma renin activity. In addition, exercise-induced tachycardia was significantly reduced by bornaprolol up to 48 hours after drug intake (pharmacodynamic half-life approximately 63-86 h) and there was a correlation between this reduction and the log plasma bornaprolol concentration over the 48-h period. Thus, bornaprolol behaved in man as a non-cardioselective and long-lasting beta-adrenoceptor blocking drug, probably devoid of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity.

Pharmacokinetics of penbutolol and its metabolites in renal insufficiency

The pharmacokinetics of penbutolol, its 4-hydroxylated metabolite and of their conjugates was studied in hypertensive patients with various degrees of renal impairment. A single oral dose of penbutolol 40 mg, was rapidly absorbed after a lag-time of 0.34 h. Its plasma concentration reached a maximum after 0.84 h and then declined bi-exponentially, with an apparent elimination half-life of 21.8 h. The hydroxylation of penbutolol was negligible and conjugation was of major importance for its elimination. Consequently, the kinetics of unchanged penbutolol were not altered by renal impairment. The 48 h-urinary excretion of penbutolol and its metabolites reached 13-14% of the administered dose, which is consistent with extensive metabolism of the drug. After treatment for 30 days with penbutolol 40 mg/d there was no accumulation of the parent drug but the concentration of its conjugates was increased. It is concluded that the dose of penbutolol need not be changed in patients with mild renal insufficiency, 4-hydroxypenbutolol is unlikely to participate in the anti-hypertensive effect of the drug, due to its low concentrations, and biotransformation of penbutolol may be enhanced during chronic treatment.

Comparative beta-adrenoceptor blocking effect and pharmacokinetics of bucindolol and propranolol in man

The beta-adrenoceptor blocking properties and pharmacokinetics of bucindolol 150 mg were compared to those of propranolol 80 mg and a placebo in a double-blind trial in 6 healthy volunteers. Heart rate (HR), systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressures and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) at rest and during vigorous exercise, and plasma renin activity (PRA) at rest, were measured before and at intervals up to 24 h after oral administration of the drugs. Bucindolol reduced exercise tachycardia and decreased exercise PEFR, thus behaving as a non-selective beta-adrenoceptor blocking drug. In contrast to propranolol, bucindolol did not reduce resting HR and PRA, probably because of its intrinsic sympathomimetic activity. It decreased resting DBP in relation to its peripheral vasodilator properties. The effects of bucindolol developed as early as 30 min after administration and lasted up to 24 h, whereas its Tmax and T 1/2 were 1.6 and 3.6 h respectively. Comparison of the time courses of plasma bucindolol and the cardiac beta-adrenoceptor blockade strongly suggests that in man bucindolol undergoes an extensive first-pass effect, leading to the formation of one or more active metabolites.

Efficacy of once daily penbutolol in chronic stable angina. An objective comparison with long-acting propranolol

The effects of penbutolol (40 mg daily) and long-acting propranolol (160 mg daily) were assessed in 26 patients with chronic stable angina in a placebo-controlled randomised double-blind crossover study with 2-weekly treatment periods. In addition to conventional subjective assessment, serial multistage treadmill exercise was used to obtain objective data on drug efficacy and 24-hr ambulatory electrocardiography performed for diurnal heart rate analysis. The mean exercise time of 6.3 +/- 0.5 (SEM) min on placebo increased to 7.3 +/- 0.6 min on penbutolol (P less than 0.01) and to 7.9 +/- 0.5 min on propranolol (P less than 0.001). The pre-exercise resting heart rate was 73 +/- 2 beats/min on placebo and decreased to 63 +/- 2 beats/min on penbutolol (P less than 0.001) and 58 +/- 2 beats/min on propranolol (P less than 0.001). The maximum exercise heart rate was similarly reduced by both drugs and there was a corresponding reduction in peak exercise double product. The time-corrected maximum ST segment depression was reduced by both drugs and neither produced a delay in ST segment recovery. Both drugs effected significant reductions in ambulatory maximum hourly heart rates throughout 24 hr. The lowest observed heart rate on penbutolol was 40 beats/min and 34 beats/min on propranolol. Penbutolol is an effective antianginal agent with a profile of action similar to that of propranolol.

The comparative beta-adrenoceptor blocking effects of penbutolol, atenolol and sustained-release metoprolol in healthy volunteers

The effects of penbutolol (40 mg), atenolol (100 mg) and sustained-release metoprolol (metoprolol SA) (200 mg) upon heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) at rest and during bicycle ergometer exercise, have been compared in 12 healthy young men using a double-blind crossover design. Measurements of each drug's effect were made before and at 3, 10 and 24 h after a single dose, and again at 24 h after the last of seven consecutive daily doses. Resting HR and systolic BP were reduced to an equivalent extent by all three drugs. During the third minute of exercise, the effects of penbutolol and atenolol upon HR and systolic BP were consistently similar and greater than those of metoprolol SA.

Haemodynamic dose-response effects of i.v. penbutolol in angina pectoris

The haemodynamic dose-response effects of intravenous penbutolol, a newer beta-adrenoceptor antagonist with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity but without cardioselectivity, were evaluated in 10 patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease. Following four logarithmetically cumulative i.v. boluses (0.5-4 mg dosage range) there was a log linear increase in plasma penbutolol concentration; the levels achieved (51 +/- 8 to 219 +/- 19 ng/ml) were in the therapeutic range (12 to 250 ng/ml). Penbutolol resulted in a linear decrease in heart rate (maximum delta HR - 4 beats/min; P less than 0.01); there was a small increase in pulmonary artery occluded pressure which reached its maximum at the lower doses (maximum delta PAOP + 1 mm Hg; P less than 0.01). The resting cardiac output, blood pressure and calculated systemic vascular resistance were unchanged. During 4 min steady-state supine bicycle exercise there was attenuation of exercise cardiac output (delta C.I. - 0.6 1 min-1 m-2; P less than 0.01) and systolic pressor response (delta SBP - 13 mm Hg; P less than 0.01) compared with control observations without change in other measured or derived variables. The haemodynamic profile of penbutolol compared favourably with other beta-adrenoceptor antagonists previously evaluated under similar conditions in patients with ischaemic heart disease. Over the i.v. dose-range evaluated penbutolol attenuated exercise-induced angina with a relatively modest depression of cardiac performance; the small change induced in resting haemodynamic variables may, in part, have been contributed to by the intrinsic sympathomimetic activity of penbutolol.

Penbutolol (Hoe 893d) in primary hypertension. Blood pressure effects, tolerance and plasma concentrations

Penbutolol (Hoe 893d), a long-acting non-selective beta-adrenoceptor blocking agent, was given once daily to 23 patients with primary hypertension, WHO Stages I-II. The dose (50-100mg) needed to achieve the therapeutic goal, i.e. supine diastolic BP less than 95 mm Hg, was titrated individually. On a daily dose of penbutolol 83 +/- 19 mg (mean +/- SD) blood pressure (BP, mean +/- SD) fell from 180 +/- 21/112 +/- 8 mmHg on placebo to 154 +/- 25/94 +/- 14 mmHg. 18 patients who reached the therapeutic goal (responders) continued in a double blind, cross-over study versus placebo, during which the supine BP fell on average 20/10 mmHg on the same dose of penbutolol, and 2/1 mmHg on placebo. Plasma concentrations (mean +/- SD) of free 0.10 +/- 0.07 microgram/ml) and total (2.02 +/- 1.39 microgram/ml) penbutolol did not differ between responders and nonresponders, and were not correlated with the fall in BP. Side effects were mild and mostly well tolerated. One patient developed dermatitis and another an elevation of liver enzymes.

Penbutolol: a preliminary review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in hypertension and angina pectoris

Penbutolol is a non-selective beta-blocking drug with 'moderate' intrinsic sympathomimetic (partial agonist) properties, and a relatively narrow dose-response range. In many other aspects its pharmacological profile resembles that of propranolol. Significant beta-blockade, as demonstrated by reduction in heart rate during exercise in healthy subjects, persists for at least 24 hours after penbutolol administration, and thus the recommended dosage schedule in both hypertension and angina involves single daily doses (20 or 40mg daily) in most patients, with a divided dose (40mg twice daily) if a higher dose is needed. However, most angina prophylaxis studies to date have not been designed to clearly demonstrate that the beneficial effects of beta-blockade with a single dose of penbutolol extend throughout a 24-hour dosing interval. Further studies are needed to provide such evidence. As might be expected, penbutolol appears to be about as effective as usual doses of propranolol in both mild to moderate hypertension and in angina, but much of the clinical experience with the drug is in unpublished form and is thus somewhat difficult to evaluate in detail. The choice of a beta-blocking drug should be based on a knowledge of the characteristic pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of the individual drugs within this group, and on careful consideration of how these properties might be used to benefit the individual patient. As is the case with most other beta-blocking drugs, penbutolol has some specific properties (e.g. relatively narrow dose-response range minimising the difficulty of dose titration, moderate intrinsic sympathomimetic activity) which may be used to advantage in certain patients.

A standard approach to compiling clinical pharmacokinetic data

A standard format for a Clinical Pharmacokinetic Summary is proposed. It consists of a heading, tables, notes, and references for each drug reviewed. The table presents a unified and logical set of clinically useful population pharmacokinetic parameters. They concern four major areas: absorption, distribution, elimination, and the relationship of concentration to effect. Within each major group, parameters dealing with extents and rates of processes are given. Each such parameter is really two: a population mea value (for example, average volume of distribution) and the standard deviation of individual values about this mean. The first value allows individual predictions of dosage or drug level to be made; the second allows computation of the likely proximity of subsequently observed quantities to those predictions. The table presents single consensus values for each population parameter, rather than a list of values. A procedure for computing these consensus values, and for revising them in the light of new data, or reinterpreted old data, is given. Examples of Summaries are given. The method appears applicable to a variety of drugs. We suggest our approach as a standard one for preparing Clinical Pharmacokinetic Summaries, and urge our colleagues to consider it for that purpose.

Single daily dose penbutolol in the treatment of hypertension: a double blind crossover comparison with propranolol

Penbutolol is a potent long-acting non-cardioselective beta-adrenergic blocker with partial agonist activity. A double-blind cross-over comparison of penbutolol given in a single daily dose and propranolol given twice daily in the treatment of ambulant patients with moderate hypertension is described. Fourteen patients completed the study and were treated with each drug for 12 weeks. Penbutolol in daily doses of 20-120 mg and propranolol in daily doses of 80-400 mg produced similar significant reductions in both supine and erect blood pressure. Penbutolol did not reduce heart rate to the same extent as propranolol, in equivalent doses. Penbutolol appears to produce adequate control of moderate hypertension when administered once a day, and this effect appears to be equivalent to divided doses of propranolol. No serious adverse effects were reported, although one patient receiving penbutolol experienced severe eye pains at a dose of 40 mg which resolved on crossing over to treatment with propranolol.

Intrinsic sympathomimetic activity of penbutolol

Six healthy volunteers took part in a randomized, single-blind, crossover study to quantitate the intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA) of penbutolol in comparison with one drug possessing ISA (alprenolol) and with the standard non-ISA drug (propranolol). Single intravenous and one week oral administrations were studied. Complete parasympathetic and sympathetic isolation of the heart was obtained by administration of atropine 0.04 mg/kg body weight i.v. and propranolol 0.4 mg/kg i.v., or corresponding equipotent doses of alprenolol 0.4 mg/kg i.v. and penbutolol i.v. 0.08 mg/kg. In the chronic, oral study propranolol 160 mg b.i.d. was given, or corresponding equipotent doses of alprenolol (400 mg b.i.d.) or penbutolol (40 mg b.i.d.). The test procedure included measurement of heart rate and blood pressure in the supine, sitting and standing positions, and during isometric and dynamic exercise. ISA was calculated by comparison of the change in of heart rate with that produced by propranolol. The ISA of alprenolol was 22--26% and of penbutolol 12--18% of maximal sympathetic activity. Isometric and dynamic exercise gave comparable ISA values.

A double-blind study of the peripheral vasoconstrictor effects of the beta-blocking drug penbutolol in patients with Raynaud's phenomenon

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study was carried out in 10 hypertensive patients who were subject to frequent attacks of Raynaud's phenomenon and suffered from cold hands, to assess the peripheral vasoconstrictor effects of penbutolol. After a wash-out period of 2 weeks on placebo, patients received two 14-day treatment periods, in random order, with either 20 mg penbutolol twice daily or placebo separated by a second 2-week single-blind wash-out period on placebo. The results of digital blood flow measurements showed that penbutolol did not produce any additional vasoconstrictor effect on digital circulation. The significance of these findings is discussed.