Oxprenolol absorption in man after single bolus dosing into two segments of the colon compared with that after oral dosing

Extracorporeal treatment for poisoning to beta-adrenergic antagonists: systematic review and recommendations from the EXTRIP workgroup

BACKGROUND

β-adrenergic antagonists (BAAs) are used to treat cardiovascular disease such as ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, dysrhythmias, and hypertension. Poisoning from BAAs can lead to severe morbidity and mortality. We aimed to determine the utility of extracorporeal treatments (ECTRs) in BAAs poisoning.

METHODS

We conducted systematic reviews of the literature, screened studies, extracted data, and summarized findings following published EXTRIP methods.

RESULTS

A total of 76 studies (4 in vitro and 2 animal experiments, 1 pharmacokinetic simulation study, 37 pharmacokinetic studies on patients with end-stage kidney disease, and 32 case reports or case series) met inclusion criteria. Toxicokinetic or pharmacokinetic data were available on 334 patients (including 73 for atenolol, 54 for propranolol, and 17 for sotalol). For intermittent hemodialysis, atenolol, nadolol, practolol, and sotalol were assessed as dialyzable; acebutolol, bisoprolol, and metipranolol were assessed as moderately dialyzable; metoprolol and talinolol were considered slightly dialyzable; and betaxolol, carvedilol, labetalol, mepindolol, propranolol, and timolol were considered not dialyzable. Data were available for clinical analysis on 37 BAA poisoned patients (including 9 patients for atenolol, 9 for propranolol, and 9 for sotalol), and no reliable comparison between the ECTR cohort and historical controls treated with standard care alone could be performed. The EXTRIP workgroup recommends against using ECTR for patients severely poisoned with propranolol (strong recommendation, very low quality evidence). The workgroup offered no recommendation for ECTR in patients severely poisoned with atenolol or sotalol because of apparent balance of risks and benefits, except for impaired kidney function in which ECTR is suggested (weak recommendation, very low quality of evidence). Indications for ECTR in patients with impaired kidney function include refractory bradycardia and hypotension for atenolol or sotalol poisoning, and recurrent torsade de pointes for sotalol. Although other BAAs were considered dialyzable, clinical data were too limited to develop recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

BAAs have different properties affecting their removal by ECTR. The EXTRIP workgroup assessed propranolol as non-dialyzable. Atenolol and sotalol were assessed as dialyzable in patients with kidney impairment, and the workgroup suggests ECTR in patients severely poisoned with these drugs when aforementioned indications are present.

Colonic treatments and targets: issues and opportunities

The colon provides a plethora of therapeutic opportunities. There are multiple disease targets, drug molecules, and colon-specific delivery systems to be explored. Clinical studies highlight the potential for systemic delivery via the colon, and the emerging data on the levels of cell membrane transporters and metabolic enzymes along the gut could prove advantageous for this. Often efflux transporters and metabolic enzyme levels are lower in the colon, suggesting a potential for improved bioavailability of drug substrates at this site. The locoregional distribution of multiple metabolic enzymes (including cytochromes), efflux transporters (including P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance proteins), and influx transporters (including the solute carrier family) along the intestine is summarized. Local delivery to the colonic mucosa remains a valuable therapeutic option. New therapies that target inflammatory mediators could improve the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, and old and new anticancer molecules could, when delivered topically, prove to be beneficial adjuncts to the current systemic or surgical treatments. New issues such as pharmacogenomics, chronotherapeutics, and the delivery of prebiotics and probiotics are also discussed in this review. Targeting drugs to the colon utilizes various strategies, each with their advantages and flaws. The most promising systems are considered in the light of the physiological data which influence their in vivo behavior.

Regional differences in quinine absorption from the undisturbed human colon assessed using a timed release delivery system

PURPOSE

To investigate the regional absorption characteristics of the distal gut using two markers of permeability, quinine (a transcellular probe) and 51CrEDTA (a paracellular probe).

METHODS

The permeability markers were delivered to the undisturbed gastrointestinal tract in 39 healthy volunteers using an oral timed-release delivery vehicle which allowed pulsed release within a particular site of the gut. Site of release was identified using gamma scintigraphy. Absorption of quinine and 51CrEDTA was assessed by measuring the percent excretion in the urine using HPLC and gamma counting respectively. Serial plasma samples allowed time-concentration curves for quinine to be plotted.

RESULTS

There was a significant trend for diminished absorption with more distal delivery of the transcellular probe, quinine, which was: 6.26 +/- 0.87% (small intestine, n = 10); 4.65 +/- 0.93% (ascending colon, n = 16); and 2.59 +/- 0.52% (transverse colon, n = 10) of the ingested dose excreted respectively (p < 0.001). No such gradient was seen with the paracellular marker, 51CrEDTA.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that delayed release formulations should aim for release in the distal small bowel and proximal colon if absorption is to be maximised. Absorption by the transcellular route diminishes in the more distal colon, a fact which has implications for delayed or sustained release formulations.

Effects of surgery on the pharmacokinetic parameters of drugs

As with other forms of stress, surgery is a time of fluctuating haemodynamics, physiological shifts, intense metabolic changes, and protein catabolism and anabolism. At times, these changes can occur within hours. There is a reasonable body of literature concerning the adverse effects of surgery on gastric emptying, but not on the effects of surgery on the distribution, metabolism and excretion of drugs. Gastric emptying is diminished or absent following major procedures, which prevent the delivery of orally administered drugs to their major site of absorption, the small bowel. Changes in the paracellular absorption of drugs may occur postoperatively, although transcellular absorption appears to be unimpaired. Distribution is affected by changes in blood volume, alterations in circulation, increases in the extracellular fluid and changes in the circulating plasma protein levels, such as albumin and alpha 1-acid glycoprotein. Little is known about alterations in drug metabolism following surgery. However, it has been shown that systemic hypoxia alters the function of some of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) system and increased levels of cytokines have an effect on the metabolism of at least 1 drug. In addition, the renal elimination of drugs is affected in patients postoperatively, although the effects of biliary clearance in this period are difficult to determine. Despite the lack of research into pharmacokinetics during the postoperative period, and given the immense and often sudden changes observed in patients post-surgery, it is reasonable to recommend vigilance with respect to drug therapy during this period.

Modest antihypertensive effect of epanolol, a beta 1-selective receptor blocker with beta 1 agonist activity: an acute and long-term hemodynamic study at rest and during exercise and double crossover comparison with atenolol on ambulatory blood pressure

Beta-blockers with less cardiodepressive effect than traditional nonselective beta(1+2)-blocking agents could be useful in the treatment of hypertension, provided the reduction in blood pressure was satisfactory. Epanolol, a selective beta 1-receptor blocker with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, induced a fall in intraarterial pressure of 8% at rest sitting and 11% during 100 W bicycle exercise after the first dose of 200 mg in 12 patients with essential hypertension. Heart rate, stroke index, and cardiac index initially fell by 14%, 11%, and 23%, respectively. The total peripheral resistance index increased by 21% after 2 hours, and then reverted towards the pretreatment level. After 10 months of epanolol treatment (mean 300 mg/day), the reduction in arterial pressure was 5% at rest and 10% during exercise. Cardiac index and heart rate were still reduced 14-21%, while total peripheral resistance was unchanged or slightly increased (2-10%). Twenty-four hour ambulatory blood pressure was higher on epanolol (300 mg/day) than on atenolol (150 mg/day) treatment (137/97 vs. 128/91 mmHg). Thus, the achieved blood pressure reduction induced by epanolol was moderate, while other characteristics of beta-receptor blockade, in particular, the reduction of heart rate and cardiac output, were maintained. This suggests that the compound may be useful for other cardiovascular disorders, e.g., angina pectoris in patients without hypertension or cardiac arrhythmia.

Drug delivery systems 5A. Oral drug delivery

The two main advantages of controlled drug delivery systems are: maintenance of therapeutically optimum drug concentrations in the plasma through zero-order release without significant fluctuations; and elimination of the need for frequent single dose administrations. The oral and other therapeutic systems in human use have validated the concept that controlled continuous drug release can minimize the daily dose of a drug required to maintain the required therapeutic effect, while minimizing unwanted pharmacological effects. By minimizing patient intervention, a design feature of therapeutic systems, compliance is automatically enhanced. Oral drug delivery systems, in particular, have required innovation in materials science to provide materials biocompatible during prolonged contact with body tissues, bioengineering to develop drug delivery modules, and clinical pharmacology for elucidation of drug action under conditions of continuous controlled drug administration. Recent work in advanced oral delivery has been primarily focused on liposome technology and the concept that substances that are normally destroyed by the stomach can be protected long enough before they could be absorbed downstream. For cost and patient convenience, oral delivery certainly would be an attractive method. The nature of biologic substances, however, with their unique technical problems, will probably limit greatly those that can be delivered orally. Besides, where delivery rate control is critical, oral delivery, even when possible, would probably be insufficiently precise. Oral delivery would also limit the substance to bloodstream delivery to the disease site. Even so, oral controlled drug delivery systems will likely find primary usefulness in specific carefully controlled therapies and prophylactic situations with due regard for drug interactions. This system represents a potentially very significant therapeutic modality. These delivery systems will find usefulness primarily in certain well-defined and well-controllable areas with due regard for individual patient variations. The purpose of the present article is to review oral controlled-release drug delivery systems, with particular emphasis on the practical aspects of testing and fabricating these systems and the underlying mechanisms by which control over drug release rate is accomplished.

ICI 141,292 (epanolol)--pharmacokinetics after single and repeated oral administration in the elderly with moderate renal impairment

The pharmacokinetics of ICI 141,292 (epanolol) were studies over 3 days after a single oral 200 mg dose and then over 24 h after 12 consecutive daily oral 200 mg doses in 16 elderly subjects (aged 65 to 94 years) with moderate renal impairment (mean creatinine clearance 33.2 ml.min-1). There was wide inter-individual variability in peak plasma ICI 141,292 concentrations (Cmax) but no significant difference was found between mean Cmax after a single dose (44.3 ng.ml-1) and after 12 doses (37.4 ng.ml-1). The mean observed time to peak plasma ICI 141,292 concentration (tmax) after a single dose (1.61 h) did not differ significantly from that after 12 doses (1.75 h). On several occasions an analytically significant second peak in ICI 141,292 plasma concentration was observed. Following the peak(s), the plasma concentrations declined biphasically and a mean terminal phase plasma half-life (t1/2) of 28.3 (range 10.2-84.8) h was calculated after a single dose. The inter-individual variability in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve to 24 h AUC (0-24) was 54 fold but there was no significant difference between AUC (0-24) after a single dose (mean 226.0 ng.h.ml-1) and AUC (0-24) after 12 consecutive doses of ICI 141,292 (mean 232.4 ng.h.ml-1). The results show that consecutive daily administration of 12 oral doses of ICI 141,292 (200 mg) does not result in significant accumulation of drug in elderly subjects with moderate renal impairment.

Microbially controlled drug delivery to the colon

The human gastrointestinal tract consists of a highly complex ecosystem of aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms that plays a significant role in the metabolism of nutrients as well as drugs. In the colon, bacteria ferment various types of substrates that are not susceptible to digestion in the small intestine. This arouses interest in specific drugs, drug delivery systems, and prodrugs that escape small bowel digestion, arrive intact, and are absorbed or degraded in the large bowel. For the past forty years, experience has been gained with the azo prodrug of 5-amino salicylic acid, salazopyrine, which is cleaved by colonic bacteria to its parent drug. Some laxative drugs were also reported to degrade into active metabolites in the colon. Lately equally interesting and more sophisticated microbial controlled delivery systems, have been developed based on similar principles.

Pharmacokinetics of acrivastine after oral and colonic administration

Six healthy male volunteers participated in this randomized, crossover open-label pharmacokinetic study consisting of two dosing segments separated by a washout period of at least 5 days. During each dosing segment, each volunteer received 12 mg of acrivastine, an investigational histamine H1-receptor antagonist, in a syrup form either orally or by colonic administration in random order. After oral and colonic administration, respectively, the following mean +/- SD pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained: Cmax 179 +/- 11 and 13.8 +/- 5.2 ng/ml; tmax, 0.85 +/- 0.13 and 3.60 +/- 0.56 hr; AUC0-12 hr, 576 +/- 57 and 104 +/- 46 hr.ng/ml. Differences between the oral and colonic administration for all three parameters were statistically significant (P less than 0.001). The mean +/- SD relative bioavailability of acrivastine from colonic compared to oral dosing was 0.18 +/- 0.09. It may be concluded, therefore, that appreciable absorption of acrivastine from the colon does not take place. These results suggest that comparison of pharmacokinetic profiles of some drugs after oral and colonic administration may be a useful technique for predicting bioavailability from a sustained release oral formulation.

Zero-order release formulation of oxprenolol hydrochloride with swelling and erosion control

Zero-order release of oxprenolol hydrochloride was obtained by controlling the swelling and erosion of the matrix. This formulation involves only mixing of drug, hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC), and sodium carboxymethylcellulose (Na CMC) at the ratio of 1:0.4:1.6, respectively, and compressing the mixture directly into tablets. The in vitro release pattern from this optimized matrix tablet was reproducible. Accelerated stability studies revealed that the optimized formulation remains stable for an approximately 2-year shelf life. This sustained-release (SR) tablet was evaluated in dogs, and for comparison a conventional (CV) formulation was also given at the same dose level. Plasma oxprenolol levels were monitored by a sensitive and specific high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method. Significant differences in the pharmacokinetic parameters, i.e., lower Cmax, higher values of tmax, MRT, AUC, and plasma concentration at 24 hr, and nearly constant plasma levels over 12 hr, indicated that the SR matrix tablet is superior to the CV rapid-releasing formulation. The in vitro release parameters and in vivo pharmacokinetics correlated well.

Relationship between the rate of appearance of oxprenolol in the systemic circulation and the location of an oxprenolol Oros 16/260 drug delivery system within the gastrointestinal tract as determined by scintigraphy

1. The position in the gastrointestinal tract of an orally administered oxprenolol Oros drug delivery system labelled with technetium-99m DTPA was followed by gamma scintigraphy, and the corresponding plasma drug concentration-time profiles after oral and i.v. administration were used to relate pharmacokinetic and transit data. 2. Gastric emptying time (0.8 +/- 0.4 h, mean +/- s.d.), and the time to arrival in the colon (3.8 +/- 0.7 h) were reasonably consistent after administration of the Oros system to fasted subjects, as were the calculated small intestine transit times (3.0 +/- 0.7 h). As expected there were wide individual variations in colonic transit, so that recorded values for total transit ranged from 6 to 32 h (median, 24.7 h). 3. Absorption of oxprenolol occurred throughout the GI tract including the colon. Plasma drug concentration-time profiles and input functions (calculated by deconvolution) could be related to transit behaviour and in vitro release. Inflexions in the calculated rate of drug input when the Oros system was located in the colon corresponded with periods of stagnation at the hepatic and splenic flexures in two subjects and the ileocaecal junction in two others. The mechanism of these changes is unclear.

Jejunal and ileal absorption of oxprenolol in man: influence of nutrients and digestive secretions on jejunal absorption and systemic availability

1 Study I evaluated the absorption of oxprenolol in the ileum, compared to jejunum, in healthy volunteers by an intestinal perfusion technique. Around 80 mg of drug were delivered as a saline solution directly in the small bowel. 2 Samples taken 30 cm distally to the site of perfusion showed that 63% of perfused oxprenolol was absorbed in the jejunum and 48% in the ileum; the differences were significant. 3 The plasma concentration-time profiles were similar for the two perfusions. The AUC and Cmax values of free and conjugated oxprenolol for the jejunal perfusion were significantly lower than those of ileum. They showed large but consistent intersubject variations in the two treatments. 4 Study II investigated, using the same technique, the influence of nutrients and digestive secretions on jejunal absorption and systemic availability of this drug. A saline (in treatments A and B) or a nutrient (in treatment C) solution containing oxprenolol was perfused into the jejunum below a balloon either inflated (A) or deflated (B and C). 5 The disappearance rate of oxprenolol from the jejunum was unaffected by endogenous secretions. The mean amount of drug absorbed along a 30-cm jejunal segment accounted for 52 (A) and 57% (B) of the total amount perfused. The intestinal absorption rate was markedly increased in the presence of nutrients (mean amount absorbed 96% for C). 6 The change in the rate of disappearance from the intestine had no effect on the systemic availability of oxprenolol (mean AUC values 8740, 8250 and 8020 nmol l-1 h for A, B and C, respectively) or its elimination from plasma.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects on physical performance of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA) during selective beta 1-blockade

In 15 healthy, not specifically trained volunteers (age: 26.6 +/- 2.7 years) single equipotent doses of a selective beta 1-blocker with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA) (200 mg Epanolol-Visacor; V) and of a selective beta 1-blocker without ISA (100 mg Metoprolol; M) were compared with placebo (P) with respect to their influence upon physical performance capacity and metabolism in a random, double blind, cross-over experimental setting. The subjects underwent three step by step incremental treadmill tests and three treadmill endurance tests until volitional exhaustion. Maximum running speed and maximum oxygen uptake were used as measures of maximum performance capacity. Running speed and oxygen uptake related to individual anaerobic threshold, and running time and running distance in the endurance tests were used as measures of endurance capacity. Both maximum and endurance performances were reduced significantly by beta-blockade. No relevant differences were discerned between V and M. The uniform reduction in exercise heart rate with both beta-blockers demonstrated the application of equipotent doses. At rest, heart rate was significantly higher under V than under M. Carbohydrate metabolism was unaffected, both beta-blockers showing equal inhibition of lipolysis during exercise. We conclude that intrinsic sympathomimetic activity has no influence upon physical performance and metabolism during selective beta 1-blockade.

In vitro and in vivo deconvolution assessment of drug release kinetics from oxprenolol Oros preparations

The relationship between in vitro and in vivo drug release from Oros systems has been examined by analysing plasma concentration data from two pharmacokinetic studies, using a numerical deconvolution technique. This method generates an input profile by comparing the response with that achieved following an instantaneous reference unit dose. The approach is conceptually simple and does not require compartmental pharmacokinetic modelling or curve fitting. In the analysis of the first study, the plasma profile following intravenous dosing was used as the reference function, allowing the combined release/absorption process to be calculated; for the second, an oral bolus was used, the result of the deconvolution therefore indicating the in vivo dissolution rate of the Oros systems. The in vivo release from Oros in most volunteers followed the same pattern as that measured in vitro; only after 6-8 h was the decline in the in vivo release rate somewhat greater than expected. In a few individuals the cumulative absorption profile reached an early plateau level which coincided, on some but not all occasions, with the premature excretion of the Oros system from the body. The amount of drug in recovered systems agreed reasonably with the prediction of the deconvolution analysis.