Absence of an inhibitory effect of omeprazole and nizatidine on phenytoin disposition, a marker of CYP2C activity

Omeprazole induces gastric permeability to digoxin

Previous animal and patient-based studies have shown that omeprazole induces a transepithelial paracellular gastric leak. This study reports on the potential for an omeprazole-induced leak of drugs with narrow therapeutic windows. Ussing chamber experiments investigated the effects of omeprazole on rat gastric corpus permeability to the drugs, digoxin and phenytoin. Digoxin (780 MW) permeated the gastric mucosa at an accelerated rate in the presence of omeprazole. This leak could contribute to dangerous elevations of blood digoxin levels in certain situations. Omeprazole was found to have no effect on the flux rate of phenytoin (252 MW). The tight-junctional leak generated by omeprazole thus exhibits specificity to the types of molecules it allows to permeate through the gastric mucosa. This leak may pose a clinical danger by increasing drug uptake into the bloodstream, a phenomenon which would act synergistically with the effect of omeprazole on inhibiting liver cytochrome P450s that remove drugs from the bloodstream, thereby elevating drug blood levels.

Drug interaction studies with esomeprazole, the (S)-isomer of omeprazole

Esomeprazole, the (S)-isomer of omeprazole, is the first proton pump inhibitor (PPI) developed as a single isomer for the treatment of patients with acid related diseases. Because of the extensive use of PPIs, the documentation of the potential for drug interactions with esomeprazole is of great importance. Altered absorption or metabolism are 2 of the major mechanisms for drug-drug interactions. Since intragastric pH will increase with esomeprazole treatment, it can be hypothesised that the absorption of drugs with pH-sensitive absorption (e.g. digoxin and ketoconazole) may be affected. Esomeprazole does not seem to have any potential to interact with drugs that are metabolised by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1 A2, 2A6, 2C9, 2D6 or 2E1. In drug interaction studies with diazepam, phenytoin and (R)-warfarin, it was shown that esomeprazole has the potential to interact with CYP2C19. The slightly altered metabolism of cisapride was also suggested to be the result of inhibition of a minor metabolic pathway for cisapride mediated by CYP2C19. Esomeprazole did not interact with the CYP3A4 substrates clarithromycin (2 studies) or quinidine. Since the slightly increased area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of cisapride could be explained as an inhibition of CYP2C19, the data on these 3 CYP3A4 substrates indicate that esomeprazole does not have the potential to inhibit this enzyme. The minor effects reported for diazepam, phenytoin, (R)-warfarin, and cisapride are unlikely to be of clinical relevance. Clarithromycin interacts with the metabolism of esomeprazole resulting in a doubling of the AUC of esomeprazole. The increased plasma concentrations of esomeprazole are unlikely to have any safety implications. It can be concluded that the potential for drug-drug interactions with esomeprazole is low, and similar to that reported for omeprazole.

Proton pump inhibitors in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most common peptic acid disease in the western world and is the commonest indication for acid suppression therapy. Major advances have been made over the past 30 years in the understanding of lower oesophageal sphincter function and the mechanism of acid secretion. Developments in surgical and pharmacological therapy have paralleled these advances. Pharmacotherapy for GERD has evolved from antacids to H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) to prokinetics to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). The H2RAs, while modestly effective in symptom relief and healing of GERD, are limited by pharmacological tolerance. The prokinetics (metoclopramide and cisapride) are limited by low efficacy, pharmacological tolerance and toxicity. The PPIs have emerged as the most effective therapy for symptom relief, healing and long-term maintenance. They have also proved to be remarkably safe and cost-effective in long-term therapy. This review evaluates the pharmacology, efficacy, tolerability, safety and cost-effectiveness of the four currently available PPIs, lansoprazole, omeprazole, pantoprazole and rabeprazole, in the treatment of GERD.

Drug interactions with proton pump inhibitors

Omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole are all mainly metabolised by the polymorphically expressed cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoform CYP2C19 (S-mephenytoin hydroxylase). All 3 proton pump inhibitors have a very limited potential for drug interactions at the CYP level. Small effects on CYP reported for these compounds are usually of no clinical relevance. No dose related adverse effects have been identified, suggesting that the small proportion of slow metabolisers is at no additional risk for clinically important drug interactions. The absorption of some compounds, e.g. benzylpenicillin (penicillin G), are altered during treatment with proton pump inhibitors as a result of the increased intragastric pH. A synergy has been confirmed between omeprazole and amoxicillin or clarithromycin in the antibacterial effect against Helicobacter pylori.

Therapy for neurocysticercosis: pharmacokinetic interaction of albendazole sulfoxide with dexamethasone

Albendazole is considered the drug of choice for neurocysticercosis. It is frequently used in combination with dexamethasone to prevent the acute inflammatory reaction due to cysticercal death. It has been reported that dexamethasone increases the plasma level of albendazole sulfoxide, the active metabolite of albendazole. The pharmacokinetic interaction of albendazole sulfoxide with dexamethasone, associated or not with cimetidine, was investigated in 24 patients with active intraparenchymal brain cysticercosis. Eight of these patients received albendazole alone, eight received it in combination with dexamethasone, and eight received it in combination with both dexamethasone and cimetidine. The pharmacokinetic parameters maximum plasma concentration, time to maximum plasma concentration, absorption half-life, and absorption rate constant did not differ between groups, suggesting that the formation of albendazole sulfoxide was not altered by the administration of dexamethasone, combined or not with cimetidine. There were significant differences, however, in the parameters plasma concentration-time curve, oral clearance, elimination half-life, and elimination rate constant, suggesting that dexamethasone, combined or not with cimetidine, decreases the rate of elimination of albendazole sulfoxide.

Selectivity of omeprazole inhibition towards rat liver cytochromes P450

1. The potency and selectivity of omeprazole as an inhibitor of cytochrome P450-mediated drug oxidations has been assessed in hepatic microsomes from the untreated, phenobarbitone-treated, beta-naphthoflavone-treated and dexamethasone-treated rat. Using the marker substrates diazepam, ethoxycoumarin, ethoxyresofurin and ethylmorphine in the above microsomal preparations, inhibitory activity against CYP1A, 2B, 2C and 3A members of the cytochrome P450 superfamily were determined. 2. In each situation studied the kinetics of inhibition by omeprazole were competitive in nature with Ki's ranging from 25 to > 1000 microM. Marker activities for the 3A family in microsomes from the dexamethasone-treated and phenobarbitone-treated rat (3-hydroxylation of diazepam and N-demethylation of ethylmorphine) were most susceptible to omeprazole inhibition (Km/Ki ratios greater than unity) compared with marker activities for the CYP1A, 2B and 2C sub-families (Km/Ki ratios < or = unity). 3. Omeprazole sulphoxide showed similar potency and selectivity of inhibition to its parent drug. Analogous studies with the same marker activities using ketoconazole indicated that both omeprazole and its sulphoxide metabolite are less potent as an inhibitor of cytochrome P4503A in rat than this well characterised prototype.

Pharmacokinetics, metabolism and interactions of acid pump inhibitors. Focus on omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole

This review updates and evaluates the currently available information regarding the pharmacokinetics, metabolism and interactions of the acid pump inhibitors omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole. Differences and similarities between the compounds are discussed. Omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole are all mainly metabolished by the polymorphically expressed cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoform S-mephenytoin hydroxylase (CYP2C19), which means that within a population a few individuals (3% of Caucasians) metabolise the compounds slowly compared with the majority of the population. For all 3 compounds, the area under the plasma concentration-versus-time curve (AUC) for a slow metaboliser is, in general, approximately 5 times higher than that in an average patient. Since all 3 compounds are considered safe and well tolerated, and no dosage-related adverse drug reactions have been identified, this finding seems to be of no clinical relevance. The acid pump inhibitors seem to be similarly handled in the elderly, where a somewhat slower elimination can be demonstrated compared with young individuals. In patients with renal insufficiency, omeprazole is eliminated as in healthy individuals, whereas the data on lansoprazole and pantoprazole are unresolved. In patients with hepatic insufficiency, as expected, the elimination rates of all 3 compounds are substantially decreased. No clinically relevant effects on specific endogenous glandular functions, such as the adrenal (cortisol), the gonads or the thyroid, were demonstrated for omeprazole and pantoprazole, whereas a few minor concerns have been raised regarding lansoprazole. The absorption of some compounds, e.g. digoxin, might be altered as a result of the increased gastric pH obtained during treatment with acid pump inhibitors, and, accordingly, similar effects are expected irrespective of which acid pump inhibitor is given. The effect of the acid pump inhibitors on enzymes in the liver has been intensely debated, and some authors have claimed that lansoprazole and pantoprazole have less potential than omeprazole to interact with other drugs metabolised by CYP. However, after assessment of available data in this area, the conclusion is that all 3 acid pump inhibitors have a very limited potential for drug interactions at the CYP level. In addition, the small effects on CYP reported for these compounds are rarely of any clinical relevance, considering the normal intra- (and inter-)individual variations in metabolism observed for most drugs. In conclusion, omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole are structurally very similar, and an evaluation of available data indicates that also with respect to pharmacokinetics, metabolism and interactions in general they demonstrate very similar properties, even though omeprazole has been more thoroughly studied with regard to different effects.

Review article: omeprazole and the cytochrome P450 system

Enzymes of the cytochrome P450 superfamily play a key role in xenobiotic metabolism. Their properties and significance are discussed with particular reference to interactions with the H+,K(+)-ATPase blocker, omeprazole. Such interactions include both inhibitory (subfamily 2C) and inducing effects (subfamily 1A). Delayed metabolic elimination of diazepam, warfarin, carbamazepin and phenytoin is probably due to omeprazole competition for the concerned isoform of subfamily 2C; however, these effects are modest to negligible in magnitude and, for phenytoin, not consistently reproducible. Also, induction of subfamily 1A is only minor as assessed from the resultant changes in N-3-demethylation of caffeine, a reaction specific to this subfamily. Concerns about a possible activation of procarcinogens that might arise from subfamily 1A induction appear ill-founded given the fact that cruciferous vegetables such as broccoli and Brussels sprouts are potent inducers, but rather seem to lower the incidence of certain types of cancer. Likewise, the idea that the toxicity of acetaminophen might increase upon subfamily 1A induction appears far-fetched, mainly because much stronger inducers of subfamily 1A (cigarette smoke and charcoaled beef) are unable to alter acetaminophen metabolism.

Lansoprazole does not affect the bioavailability of oral contraceptives

The effects of the proton pump inhibitor lansoprazole on the bioavailability of a low-dose oral contraceptive (OC), containing 0.03 mg ethinyloestradiol (EE) and 0.15 mg levonorgestrel (LNG), were investigated. Twenty-four healthy females (aged 19-35 years; weight 60.6 +/- 7.1 kg) participated in a multiple-dose, placebo-controlled, randomized two-way cross-over study. All subjects received the OC over 2 full menstrual cycles from day 1 to day 21 separated by a drug-free interval of 7 days. Lansoprazole (60 mg day-1) or placebo was coadministered for 3 weeks each. Plasma concentrations of EE and LNG were determined by GC-MS. The 90% confidence intervals for ratios of Cmax and AUC after log transformation of both EE and LNG ranged between 91 and 111%, indicating that lansoprazole did not affect the bioavailability of EE and LNG.