Pharmacokinetics of zidovudine and dideoxyinosine alone and in combination in children with HIV infection

Prediction of Clearance in Children from Adults Following Drug-Drug Interaction Studies: Application of Age-Dependent Exponent Model

Background and Objective

Pharmacokinetic drug–drug interaction (DDI) studies are conducted in adult subjects during drug development but there are limited studies that have characterized pharmacokinetic DDI studies in children. The objective of this study was to evaluate if the DDI clearance values from adults can be allometrically extrapolated from adults to children.

Methods

Fifteen drugs were included in this study and the age of the children ranged from premature neonates to adolescents (30 observations across the age groups). The age-dependent exponent (ADE) model was used to predict the clearance of drugs in children from adults following DDI studies.

Results

The prediction error of drug clearances following DDIs in children ranged from 4 to 67%. Of 30 observations, 17 (57%) and 27 (90%) observations had a prediction error ≤ 30% and ≤ 50%, respectively.

Conclusion

This study indicates that it is possible to predict the clearance of drugs with reasonable accuracy in children from adults following DDI studies using an ADE model. The method is simple, robust, and reliable and can replace other complex empirical models.

Role of nucleoside transporters in transplacental pharmacokinetics of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors zidovudine and emtricitabine

INTRODUCTION

Zidovudine (AZT) and emtricitabine (FTC) are effective and well tolerated antiretroviral drugs, routinely used in the prevention of perinatal HIV transmission. However, precise mechanism(s) involved in their transfer from mother to fetus are not fully elucidated. Since both drugs are nucleoside analogues, we hypothesized that the mechanisms of their transplacental passage might include equilibrative nucleoside transporters, ENT1 and/or ENT2.

METHODS

To address this issue, we performed in vitro accumulation assays in the BeWo placental trophoblast cell line, ex vivo uptake studies in fresh villous fragments isolated from human placenta and in situ dually perfused rat term placenta experiments.

RESULTS

Applying this complex array of methods, we did not prove that ENTs play a significant role in transfer of AZT or FTC across the placenta.

DISCUSSION

We conclude that the transplacental passage of AZT and FTC is independent of ENTs. Disposition of either compound into the fetal circulation should thus not be affected by ENT-mediated drug-drug interactions or placental expression of the transporters.

Population pharmacokinetics study of recommended zidovudine doses in HIV-1-infected children

The aims of this study were to describe the pharmacokinetics of zidovudine (ZDV) and its biotransformation to its metabolite, 3*-azido-3*-deoxy-5*-glucuronylthymidine (G-ZDV), in HIV-infected children, to identify factors that influence the pharmacokinetics of ZDV, and to compare and evaluate the doses recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). ZDV concentrations in 782 samples and G-ZDV concentrations in 554 samples from 247 children ranging in age from 0.5 to 18 years were retrospectively measured. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed with NONMEM software (version 6.2), and the pharmacokinetics of ZDV were best described by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. The effect of body weight on the apparent elimination clearance and volume of distribution was significant. The mean population parameter estimates were as follows: absorption rate, 2.86 h(-1); apparent elimination clearance, 89.7 liters · h(-1) (between-subject variability, 0.701 liters · h(-1)); apparent volume of distribution, 229 liters (between-subject variability, 0.807 liters); metabolic formation rate constant, 12.6 h(-1) (between-subject variability, 0.352 h(-1)); and elimination rate constant of G-ZDV, 2.27 h(-1). On the basis of simulations with FDA and WHO dosing recommendations, the probabilities of observing efficient exposures (doses resulting in exposures of between 3 and 5 mg/liter · h) with less adverse events (doses resulting in exposures below 8.4 mg/liter · h) were higher when the FDA recommendations than when the WHO recommendations were followed. In order to improve the FDA recommendations, ZDV doses should be reconsidered for the weight band (WB) of 20 to 40 kg. The most appropriate doses should be decreased from 9 to 8 mg/kg of body weight twice a day (BID) for the WB from 20 to 29.9 kg and from 300 to 250 mg BID for the WB from 30 to 39.9 kg. The highest dose, 300 mg BID, should be started from body weights of 40 kg.

Nucleoside and nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in children

By the end of 2006, approximately 2.3 million children worldwide were living with HIV infection, representing about 15% of all HIV-infected individuals but only 5-7% of the total population of treated patients worldwide. Despite a general increase in the use of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in resource-limited settings, appropriate care and ART remain inaccessible for most of the world's HIV-infected children. ART of children is challenging because of a general lack of paediatric formulations (including tablets in paediatric strengths), limited options of drugs available for children (some have been approved only for use in adults), different viral and immunological responses, dependency on caregivers for administration of the therapy, and specific issues of toxicity in long-term therapy related to maturation and development. As in adults, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) are a key component of any ART schedule in children, being the recommended 'backbone' treatment in US, European and WHO guidelines, and, indeed, NRTIs have been extensively studied in children. NRTIs are the class of antiretroviral drugs that have more drugs licensed for paediatric use and more paediatric formulations.Generally, the dual NRTI backbone treatment of combination with a non-NRTI (NNRTI) or protease inhibitor (PI) should comprise a cytidine analogue (lamivudine, emtricitabine) and a thymidine analogue (stavudine, zidovudine), guanosine analogue (i.e. abacavir), or nucleotide RTI (NtRTI; i.e. tenofovir). European and US guidelines recommend the use of triple NRTI therapy (abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine) in children with anticipated poor adherence to other treatment regimens because of tablet burden. In conclusion, while use of ART in children needs to be dramatically increased, selecting and administering the best drug combination for children is still limited by a lack of paediatric formulations and knowledge of drug metabolism, safety and efficacy in children. NRTIs are already a key component of paediatric ART, but fixed-dose combinations and specific research in children are needed to optimise their use. In this article we review the available information to facilitate selection of the best NRTI for backbone treatment in combination ART for HIV-infected children.

Pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1-infected children

The initiation of antiretroviral therapy has resulted in an impressive reduction in the rate of disease progression in AIDS and HIV-1-related deaths in children; however, there are still several major challenges to be faced in order to improve therapy. A major topic that needs to be dealt with is the establishment of the optimal dosage of antiretroviral therapy for children. This review presents the currently available peer-reviewed data on the pharmacokinetics of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), protease inhibitors (PIs) and fusion inhibitors (FIs) in children. In addition, the data are discussed in relation to the currently available European and US guidelines and the US FDA-approved drug labels. High intra- and interpatient variability in pharmacokinetics are often observed for all antiretroviral drugs. The number of children included in the pharmacokinetic studies is often small and children are often divided into divergent groups using different dosage levels and/or drug formulations. For a substantial number of antiretroviral drugs, dosage recommendations, especially for young children, are still absent in the European and US guidelines. The recommended drug dosages in the guidelines are often different from that in the officially approved drug product label. In addition, the recommended drug dosages may deviate between the European and US guidelines. Thus, while practioners aim to meet the recommendations in the official guidelines, patients may receive highly divergent dosages of medication. The high intra- and interpatient variability in pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral drugs in children hampers the application of fixed dosages of antiretroviral drugs. For PIs and NNRTIs, plasma drug levels correlate with viral suppression and drug toxicity. NRTIs are prodrugs that are intracellularly converted to their active triphosphate form and, therefore, plasma NRTI levels correlate poorly with viral suppression. Therapeutic drug monitoring of PIs and NNRTIs should be considered to optimise HIV therapy in children.

Antiretroviral pharmacokinetics in the paediatric population: a review

Characteristics unique to paediatric pharmacotherapy should be considered when treating children infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Processes of growth and development in the paediatric patient can significantly affect drug absorption and disposition. Immature renal function, altered hepatic enzyme activity and differences in drug absorption lead to variations in systemic exposure of antiretrovirals among children. Paediatric patients are also subject to unique circumstances that may prevent adherence to antiretroviral regimens. The pharmacokinetics of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors differ significantly among preterm infants, full-term infants and older children. Decreased hepatic glucuronidation activity in neonates results in pharmacokinetic differences in zidovudine disposition when compared with older children. Didanosine, stavudine and lamivudine are renally eliminated, thus resulting in differences among young children with immature renal function. Pharmacokinetic data for non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in children are limited. Decreased elimination of nevirapine among neonates has been observed, primarily due to decreased enzymatic activity. Pharmacokinetic differences across age groups have been noted for efavirenz, but no formal assessments have been conducted in children weighing less than 10kg. Protease inhibitors are metabolised by the cytochrome P450 enzyme system, which is not fully developed in younger children. Decreased metabolism can result in elevated plasma concentrations, thereby increasing the chance of toxicity. Unfortunately, few studies exist evaluating the pharmacokinetics of antiretrovirals in children. As a result, dosage selection of antiretrovirals in children often occurs without adequate data. As the life expectancy of HIV-infected children increases, use of antiretrovirals to prevent disease progression also increases. If prevention of treatment failure continues to be the goal of antiretroviral therapy, the pharmacokinetics of antiretrovirals in children need to be assessed early in the drug development process.

Zidovudine: a review of its use in the management of vertically-acquired pediatric HIV infection

Zidovudine is a thymidine analog that, after intracellular phosphorylation to zidovudine triphosphate metabolite, inhibits HIV-specific reverse transcriptase and terminates proviral DNA. Zidovudine administered to mildly symptomatic women with HIV infection in the antepartum (100mg orally 5 times/day), intrapartum (2 mg/kg intravenously over 1 hour then 1 mg/kg/h) and then to the neonate for 6 weeks (2 mg/kg), significantly reduced the rate of vertical HIV transmission by about two thirds, in the absence of breast-feeding (The Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group 076 trial, standard protocol). Shorter zidovudine regimens, reduced the risk of transmission of HIV by 50% in a non-breast-feeding population and by about 37% in breast-feeding populations. Zidovudine (standard protocol) in combination with lamivudine was superior to zidovudine alone. A short oral zidovudine regimen was not as effective as a two-dose oral nevirapine regime, although the combination of short-course zidovudine plus lamivudine was as effective. Suppression of viral replication in neonates, infants and children has been achieved with zidovudine when used in triple-therapy regimens that include other antiviral drugs. Results from a trial of treatment-naive children indicate that the antiviral efficacy of combinations of zidovudine and lamivudine or abacavir, given with the protease inhibitor nelfinavir, is superior to treatment with this combination minus nelfinavir. When zidovudine was used in other highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens significant improvements in surrogate markers were consistently seen. Changing to ritonavir-containing regimens was superior to changing to treatment with two new nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Short- and long-term (up to 5.6 years) outcomes from clinical trials showed that prenatal and neonatal exposure to zidovudine was generally well tolerated with the exception of mild anemia that resolved spontaneously after treatment cessation. Zidovudine was generally well tolerated as monotherapy in clinical trials of pediatric patients with HIV infection, and adverse events were similar to those reported in adults, with anemia and neutropenia being the most common.

CONCLUSION

Zidovudine, as monotherapy or in combination with other antiretroviral agents, remains a first-choice therapy for the prophylaxis of mother-to-child HIV transmission as shown by substantial reductions in transmission rates. Where feasible, the optimal strategy to prevent vertical transmission is to combine drug therapy with Cesarean section delivery and no breast-feeding. In addition, zidovudine in combination with another nucleoside analogue and a protease inhibitor is a first- or second-choice therapy for the treatment of pediatric HIV infection as significant and sustained reductions in viral load have been shown in both plasma and cerebrospinal fluid.

Human variability in glucuronidation in relation to uncertainty factors for risk assessment

The appropriateness of the default uncertainty factor for human variability in kinetics has been investigated for glucuronidation using an extensive database of substrates metabolised primarily by this pathway. Inter-individual variability was quantified for 15 compounds from published pharmacokinetic studies (after oral and intravenous dosing) in healthy adults and other subgroups using parameters relating to chronic exposure (metabolic and total clearances, area under the plasma concentration time-curve (AUC)) and acute exposure (C(max)). Low inter-individual variability (about 30-35%) was found for all parameters (clearance corrected or not corrected for body weight, metabolic clearance, oral AUC and C(max)) after either iv or oral administration to healthy adults. The overall variability of 31% for glucuronidation in healthy adults supported the validity of the default kinetic uncertainty factor of 3.16 for this group, because it would cover more than 99% of individuals. Comparisons between potentially sensitive subgroups and healthy adults using differences in means and variability indicated that neonates showed the greatest impairment of glucuronidation, and that the 3.16 kinetic default factor applied to the mean data for adults would be inadequate for this subpopulation. The in vivo data have been used to derive pathway-related default factors for compounds eliminated largely via glucuronidation.

Bioavailability of once- and twice-daily regimens of didanosine in human immunodeficiency virus-infected children

The bioavailability of didanosine at 180 mg/m(2) once daily was compared to that at 90 mg/m(2) twice daily in 24 children with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. Children were studied at steady state using optimal sampling and prior pharmacokinetic parameter estimates. Relative bioavailability was 0. 95 +/- 0.49, supporting the potential clinical adequacy of once-daily dosing.

Didanosine: an updated review of its use in HIV infection

Didanosine, like zidovudine, stavudine and lamivudine, is a nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI). In the target cell for HIV, didanosine is converted to its active moiety, dideoxyadenosine-5'-triphosphate (ddATP), which inhibits HIV reverse transcriptase and terminates viral DNA growth. It is now well established that didanosine therapy produces beneficial effects on virological and immunological markers of HIV disease and improves clinical outcome in adults or children with HIV infection. In numerous clinical trials, pronounced and sustained decreases in plasma HIV RNA levels and increases in CD4+ cell counts occurred in previously untreated or antiretroviral therapy-experienced patients treated with didanosine in combination with at least 1 other antiretroviral drug; zidovudine, stavudine, lamivudine, nevirapine, nelfinavir and hydroxyurea (hydroxycarbamide) are among the drugs that have been given in combination with didanosine. Of note, HIV RNA levels decreased to below the limits of detection in some patients receiving triple or dual therapy with didanosine-containing regimens. In double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, triple therapy with didanosine, zidovudine and nevirapine was significantly more effective than dual therapy with various combinations of these agents in improving surrogate disease markers in treatment-naive patients and in delaying disease progression or death in treatment-experienced patients with advanced disease. Improvements in virological and immunological markers were greater with didanosine-containing triple regimens than with dual therapy or monotherapy in comparative trials. Triple therapy with didanosine, stavudine and indinavir showed efficacy similar to that of various other triple therapy regimens in nonblind comparative trials. Comparator regimens included combinations of stavudine, lamivudine plus indinavir, zidovudine, lamivudine plus indinavir and didanosine, stavudine and nevirapine. Combination therapy with didanosine plus hydroxyurea as dual therapy or with a third agent produced marked and sustained decreases in HIV RNA levels in the plasma and in lymph nodes. Combination therapy with didanosine and zidovudine delays disease progression and prolongs survival in patients with intermediate or advanced HIV infection. In large, randomised, double-blind, clinical trials, dual therapy with didanosine plus zidovudine was significantly more effective than zidovudine monotherapy in preventing disease progression and prolonging survival in previously untreated or antiretroviral therapy-experienced patients with intermediate or advanced HIV infection. Pancreatitis and peripheral neuropathy are serious adverse effects of didanosine. These effects are dose-related and usually reversible after discontinuation of treatment. Nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and/or abdominal pain have been reported in patients receiving treatment with the drug.

CONCLUSIONS

Didanosine is an effective and generally well tolerated drug in previously untreated and antiretroviral therapy-experienced patients with HIV infection. Given once or twice daily, it has an important role as a component of triple combination regimens for the treatment of patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic HIV infection.

Transport, metabolism and elimination mechanisms of anti-HIV agents

Currently available anti-HIV drugs can be classified into three categories: nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and protease inhibitors. Knowledge of these anti-HIV drugs in various physiological or pharmacokinetic compartments is essential for design and development of drug delivery systems for the treatment of HIV infection. The input and output of anti-HIV drugs in the biological systems are described by their transport and metabolism/elimination in this review. Transport mechanisms of anti-HIV agents across various biological barriers, i.e., gastrointestinal wall, skin, mucosa, blood cerebrospinal barrier, blood-brain barrier, placenta, and cellular membranes, are discussed. Their fates during and after systemic absorption and their metabolism-related drug interactions are reviewed. Many anti-HIV drugs presently marketed in the US bear some significant drawbacks such as relatively short half-life, low bioavailability, poor penetration into the central nervous system, and undesirable side effects. Efforts have been made to design drug delivery systems for the anti-HIV agents to: (1) reduce the dosing frequency; (2) increase the bioavailability and decrease the degradation/metabolism in the gastrointestinal tract; (3) improve the CNS penetration and inhibit the CNS efflux; and (4) deliver them to target cells selectively with minimal side effects. We hope to stimulate further interests in the area of controlled delivery of anti-HIV agents by providing current status of transport and metabolism/elimination of these agents.

Pharmacokinetic interaction of megestrol acetate with zidovudine in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients

This nonrandomized, two-period crossover study was performed to assess whether concomitant administration of megestrol acetate influences the steady-state pharmacokinetics of zidovudine and its inactive 5'-O-glucuronide metabolite. Twelve HIV-positive, asymptomatic male volunteers received a 100-mg oral capsule dose of zidovudine at least 30 min before meals five times a day at 0700, 1100, 1500, 1900, and 2300 h on study days 1 to 3 and a single 100-mg dose at 0700 h on day 4. On days 5 to 17, 800 mg of megestrol acetate, as a 40-mg/ml aqueous suspension, was administered orally immediately before the 0700 h dose of zidovudine. On days 5 to 16, zidovudine was also administered at 1100, 1500, 1900, and 2300 h. Serial blood samples were collected for 12 h after the single 100-mg dose of zidovudine on days 4 and 17; trough samples were also obtained just before the 0700 h dose on days 2 to 4 and 15 to 17. Levels of zidovudine and its glucuronide in plasma were assayed by a validated radioimmunoassay. Statistical analysis of trough plasma level data indicated that steady-state levels of zidovudine and its glucuronide in plasma had been attained when pharmacokinetic assessments were made on days 4 and 17. When megestrol acetate and zidovudine were coadministered for 13 days, differences of -14, -6.5, and -4.6% in mean zidovudine peak concentration and areas under the curve at 0 to 4 and 0 to 12 h, respectively, +22.5% in mean trough concentration, +2.6% in mean plasma half-life, and no change in median time to peak were observed compared to conditions when zidovudine was administered alone; for zidovudine 5'-O-glucuronide the respective differences were -9, -7.3, -4.4, +2.3, and +10% and no change. None of the differences were statistically significant (P > 0.05). Concomitant therapy with megestrol acetate, at the dose employed to treat anorexia, cachexia, or an unexplained, significant weight loss in AIDS patients, did not alter the steady-state pharmacokinetics of zidovudine or its 5'-O-glucuronide metabolite.

Vertical human immunodeficiency virus-1 infection: involvement of the central nervous system and treatment

Involvement of the central nervous system (CNS) contributes substantially to morbidity and mortality of vertical infection with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1. The clinical spectrum ranges from minor developmental disabilities to severe and progressive encephalopathy. Progression of the disease varies considerably. Both direct viral and indirect host-related pathogenic mechanisms have been proposed. The diagnosis depends on neurological and neurodevelopmental assessments. So far, HIV-1-specific antiviral treatment has shown limited effects on neurological manifestations in symptomatic children. Thus, efforts are needed to improve prevention and treatment of CNS involvement. It is still unclear whether early use of antiretroviral agents is of benefit.

CONCLUSION

Since experience of treatment of HIV-1 infections in adults cannot easily be translated to children, paediatric clinical trials are needed to answer questions specific to the unique characteristics of children.