Factors for graft-versus-host disease after donor lymphocyte infusions with an escalating dose regimen: lack of association with cell dose

Donor lymphocyte infusion in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is an important treatment modality in the management of relapsed hematological malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Donor T lymphocytes can be used in a therapeutic, pre-emptive or prophylactic manner in an attempt to stimulate a graft versus leukemia (GVL) effect and eradicate residual disease or even prevent relapse in a high-risk setting. DLIs are not without complications, however, graft versus host disease (GVHD) in particular. Data to date is limited to retrospective and small prospective studies. This review summarizes the available literature on approaches to managing relapse, dosing and timing of DLI, complications and potential future therapies.

Escalated Dose Donor Lymphocyte Infusion Treatment in Patients with Primary Immune Deficiencies After HSCT with Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Regimen

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND

Mixed chimerism is a major concern after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) using a reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen in primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs). A donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) escalating dose regimen has been developed with the aim of reducing toxicity while preserving efficacy. However, the graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) development remains the most common and adverse effect of DLI and continues to be a limiting factor in its application, especially nonmalignant diseases such as PIDs. We prospectively evaluated PID patients after HSCT using RIC in Childrens Medical Center, who were candidates for an escalating dose of DLI for MC from 2016 to 2018.

METHODS

With the median follow-up of 16.4 months, 12 patients (nine males and three females) with a median age of 3.72 years received DLI. The median number of DLI was 3.2 (range, 1-5), the maximum and total dose of DLIs administered per patient were 3.6 × 10⁷ (range, 1-5) cells/kg CD3⁺ and 9.3 × 10⁷ (range, 1-15) cells/kg CD3⁺ cells, respectively.

RESULTS

Median donor chimerism at baseline before the DLIs was 41% (range, 11-73%), patients received DLIs at a median of 105 (range, 37-230) days and 52 (range, 3-168) days after the HSCT and onset of the MC, respectively. At the final assessment, six (54.5%) patients improved after DLIs at a median of 47.3 days.

CONCLUSION

PID patients may benefit from DLI with an escalating dose regimen, but the GvHD development remains a concern during the DLI, and the optimum dose and frequency must be standardized.

Analysis of Cell Subsets in Donor Lymphocyte Infusions from HLA Identical Sibling Donors after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplant

Donor lymphocytes infusions (DLIs) are a major therapeutic approach to treat relapse and mixed chimerism after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT). The impact of the composition regarding different cell subsets in the development of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is not fully understood. We performed a cell subsets analysis of 56 DLIs from fully HLA-compatible identical matched sibling donors (MSDs) in 36 alloHCT patients and studied its association with GVHD. A median of one DLI was infused per patient. Fourteen patients (38%) developed GVHD. The cell composition analysis of the first DLI (DLI1) showed that a high dose of B cells (P = .03) and CD27⁺ B cells (P < .01) was associated with GVHD. We identified DLI dose cutoff points for several cell populations above which GVHD was more frequent (CD8⁺ T_N >3 × 10⁶ cells/kg, CD27⁺ B cells >2.6 × 10⁶/kg, CD27⁺ NK >0.35 × 10⁶ cells/kg, and mononuclear cells >0.83 × 10⁸/kg). Noteworthy, the proportion of CD4⁺ naive T cells (T_N) or unselected T_N was not linked with GVHD and a DLI1 containing a higher dose of regulatory T cells was not protective for GVHD. We studied several transplant clinical variables and did not find any association with GVHD. Altogether, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of the cell populations in a DLI from MSDs and identifies potential key cell subsets, which provides insight for the understanding of GVHD after DLI.

Prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion for relapse prevention: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Primary disease relapse (PDR) of malignant hematologic conditions after standard hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is one of the most challenging diseases; therefore ongoing researches are aiming at relapse prevention and minimizing the transplant-related side effects. Prophylactic donor lymphocytes (pDLI) had been proposed as a valuable strategy for PDR prevention, but early studies had been discouraging due to the limited benefit and possible association with acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between pDLI use, PDR, aGVHD and OS.

METHOD

We performed a comprehensive literature search in MEDLINE, Cochrane library and Embase database from inception to May 2019 for studies that evaluated the association between pDLI and PDR. We conducted a random effect meta-analysis of 9 studies involving a total of 748 participants (pDLI = 398, non-pDLI = 350) and reported the pooled odd ratio (OR) for association of pDLI use, PDR, aGVHD and OS.

RESULT

We found a significant decreased odd of PDR in the pDLI group (pooled OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.30-0.58, I2 = 0%), but there was no significant increased odd of aGVHD (pooled OR of 0.98, 95% CI 0.56-1.72, I2 = 0.8%). We also found that there was an increased odd of overall survival (OS) (pooled OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.85-5.45, I2 = 50.2%).

CONCLUSION

There are significantly decreased odd of PDR and increased odd of OS in the pDLI group compared to the control group, but there is no statistically significant increased odd of aGVHD as suggested by previous studies. We concluded that pDLI is a potentially valuable method for post-transplant PDR prevention.

Bone Marrow Transplantation 1957-2019

Clinical bone marrow transplantation started in 1957 at a time when remarkably little was known about hematopoietic stems cells, immune responses to transplants or the identity of transplant antigens. This review will delineate the substantial increase in knowledge about these three areas gained between then and 1992 when the Ceppellini School course on Bone Marrow Transplantation was held, along with the progress made in clinical application, as well as the stumbling blocks that remained to be overcome by further research to advance knowledge. It will outline the significant progress made between 1992 and the present year, 2019, and the remaining problems.

Immunothérapie et greffe de cellules souches hématopoïétiques allogéniques

IMMUNOTHERAPY AND ALLOGENEIC STEM CELLS TRANSPLANTATION

Allogeneic stem cell transplantations represent perfect example of immunotherapy. Its positive aspects are due to the graft versus tumor effect. Unfortunately, this therapeutic advantage is usually associated with graft versus host effects. While the mechanism of these two graft reactions remain unclear, this is possible to modulate these immunologic effects. The type of conditioning regimen, the source of donor and the use of donor cells after the transplantation may influence the toxicity and the tumor response, leading to a better optimization of the procedure. This paper is presenting all the parameters which may contribute to improve allogeneic stem cell transplantations.

Strategies to accelerate immune recovery after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

The interplay existing between immune reconstitution and patient outcome has been extensively demonstrated in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. One of the leading causes of infection-related mortality is the slow recovery of T-cell immunity due to the conditioning regimen and/or age-related thymus damage, poor naïve T-cell output, and restricted T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoires. With the aim of improving posttransplantation immune reconstitution, several immunotherapy approaches have been explored. Donor leukocyte infusions are widely used to accelerate immune recovery, but they carry the risk of provoking graft-versus-host disease. This review will focus on sophisticated strategies of thymus function-recovery, adoptive infusion of donor-derived, allodepleted T cells, T-cell lines/clones specific for life-threatening pathogens, regulatory T cells, and of T cells transduced with suicide genes.

The cell composition of infused donor lymphocyte has different impact in different types of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is often used to enhance the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). In this study, we first evaluated the impact of the cell composition of a modified DLI (mDLI) on the prognoses of patients. A total of 194 patients undergoing allo-HSCT were enrolled and received mDLI for various clinical reasons. The infused cellular components of the mDLI were examined by flow cytometry. The results showed that infusion with a lower dose of CD14(+) cells (<0.33 × 10(8) /kg) was an independent risk factor for the occurrence of II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) (HR = 0.104, p = 0.032) in human leukoctye antigen-identical transplant patients. In addition, a dose of CD14(+) cells greater than the 50th percentile was associated with a lower incidence of hematological relapse and longer disease-free survival (DFS) after the mDLI (relapse: HR = 0.193, p = 0.007; DFS: HR = 0.259, p = 0.016). However, we also found that a greater number of CD14(+) cells were an independent risk factor for II-IV aGVHD (HR = 1.758, p = 0.034) in haploidentical allo-HSCT. In conclusion, our data were the first to demonstrate that the cell composition of a 56 mDLI played a distinct role in different types of allo-HSCT. This finding provided a novel approach for the development of cellular therapies by manipulating the components of infused cells.

Donor lymphocyte infusions and second transplantation as salvage treatment for relapsed myelofibrosis after reduced-intensity allografting

Thirty myelofibrosis patients (21 males, nine females) with relapse (n = 27) or graft-rejection (n = 3) after dose-reduced allografting underwent a salvage strategy including donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) and/or second allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Twenty-six patients received a median number of three (range, 1-5) DLIs in a dose-escalated mode starting with a median dose of 1·2 × 10(6) (range, 0·003-8 × 10(6) ) up to median dose of 40 × 10(6) T-cells/kg (range, 10-130 × 10(6) ). 10/26 patients (39%) achieved complete response (CR) to DLIs. Acute (grade II-IV) and chronic graft-versus-host (GvHD) disease occurred in 12% and 36% cases. Thirteen non-responders to DLI and four patients who did not receive DLI due to graft-rejection or acute transformation of the blast phase underwent a second allogeneic HSCT from alternative (n = 15) or the same (n = 2) donor. One patient (6%) experienced primary graft-failure and died. Acute (II-IV) and chronic GvHD were observed in 47% and 46% of patients. Overall responses after second HSCT were seen in 12/15 patients (80%: CR: n = 9, partial response: n = 3). The 1-year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality for recipients of a second allograft was 6%, and the cumulative incidence of relapse was 24%. After a median follow-up of 27 months, the 2-year overall survival and progression-free survival for all 30 patients was 70% and 67%, respectively. In conclusion, our two-step strategy, including DLI and second HSCT for non-responding or ineligible patients, is an effective and well-tolerated salvage approach for patients relapsing after reduced-intensity allograft after myelofibrosis.

Clinical options after failure of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with hematologic malignancies

Disease recurrence is the single most common cause of death after allogeneic or autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Disease status and chemosensitivity at the time of transplantation, as well as the development of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), are factors known to influence the risk of relapse post-HSCT. Both acute and chronic GVHD have been associated with decreased relapse rates; however, owing to toxicity, overall survival is not consistently improved in these patients. Furthermore, there is a transient period of immunodeficiency after HSCT, which may permit residual malignant cells to proliferate early in the post-transplant course, before the donor immune system can establish a graft-versus-tumor response. Patients who fail an initial HSCT have an extremely poor outcome; therefore, maneuvers to prevent, identify and treat recurrent disease as early as possible in these situations are necessary. Strategies to distinguish graft-versus-tumor from GVHD, to enhance both general and disease-specific immune reconstitution after transplantation, and to increase donor-mediated anti-host immune reactions are being investigated in clinical trials. Single agent nontoxic post-HSCT chemotherapy, cellular therapies and second allogeneic HSCT using reduced intensity regimens are among the modalities under investigation.

CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cell depletion improves the graft-versus-tumor effect of donor lymphocytes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Donor T cells play a pivotal role in the graft-versus-tumor effect after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Regulatory T cells (T(reg)s) may reduce alloreactivity, the major component of the graft-versus-tumor effect. In the setting of donor lymphocyte infusion after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, we postulated that T(reg) depletion could improve alloreactivity and likewise the graft-versus-tumor effect of donor T cells. The safety and efficacy of T(reg)-depleted donor lymphocyte infusion was studied in 17 adult patients with malignancy relapse after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. All but one had previously failed to respond to at least one standard donor lymphocyte infusion, and none had experienced graft-versus-host disease. Two of the 17 patients developed graft-versus-host disease after their first T(reg)-depleted donor lymphocyte infusion and experienced a long-term remission of their malignancy. Four of the 15 patients who did not respond after a first T(reg)-depleted donor lymphocyte infusion received a second T(reg)-depleted donor lymphocyte infusion combined with lymphodepleting chemotherapy aimed to also eliminate recipient T(reg)s. All four developed acute-like graft-versus-host disease that was associated with a partial or complete and durable remission. In the whole cohort, graft-versus-host disease induction through T(reg) depletion was associated with improved survival. These results suggest that T(reg)-depleted donor lymphocyte infusion is a safe, feasible approach that induces graft-versus-host or graft-versus-tumor effects in alloreactivity-resistant patients. In patients not responding to this approach, the combination of chemotherapy-induced lymphodepletion of the recipient synergizes with the effect of T(reg)-depleted donor lymphocyte infusion. These findings offer a rational therapeutic approach for cancer cellular immunotherapy.

Donor lymphocyte infusion for leukemia relapse after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Leukemia relapse is a serious therapeutic challenge following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In this retrospective study, 23 patients [15 (65.2%) AML, 8 (34.8%) ALL] who received DLI+/-reinduction chemotherapy for post-transplant relapse were reviewed. The overall response rate of DLI was 66.7% for AML and 50% for ALL. A total of 15 patients (65.2%) developed acute graft versus host disease (GVHD). Response rates were higher in patients with GVHD (80% versus 25%; p=0.01; OR: 12.0). The probability of OS was better in patients who respond to DLI (p=0.04). Further strategies are required to improve the anti-tumor properties of alloreactive donor lymphocytes and to obtain durable responses with DLI in patients with relapsed acute leukemia after allogeneic HSCT.

Donor regulatory T cells identified by FoxP3 expression but also by the membranous CD4+CD127low/neg phenotype influence graft-versus-tumor effect after donor lymphocyte infusion

Regulatory T cells (Treg) play a pivotal role in the control of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and might also influence the graft-versus-tumor effect after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. We assessed this role after donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) by quantifying Treg in DLI products, using the CD25, Foxp3 but also the recently identified CD127 Treg markers. Compared with others, patients in durable complete remission of their malignancy after DLI had received a lower number of FoxP3CD25, FoxP3CD127, or CD4CD127 Treg cells (P=0.04). The CD4CD127 Treg content of DLI remained significantly correlated with the hematologic response in multivariate analysis (P=0.05). Treg may thus inhibit graft-versus-tumor effect after DLI, a setting where the antitumoral effect observed is only driven by T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity, independently of any other associated treatment. In comparison with the intracytoplasmic Foxp3 marker, the membranous CD4CD127 phenotype of Treg could be particularly relevant to manipulate this cell-population, to increase the antitumoral response in strategies of allogeneic or autologous immunotherapy.

Differential rates of replacement of human dermal dendritic cells and macrophages during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Animal models of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation have been used to analyze the turnover of bone marrow-derived cells and to demonstrate the critical role of recipient antigen-presenting cells (APC) in graft versus host disease (GVHD). In humans, the phenotype and lineage relationships of myeloid-derived tissue APC remain incompletely understood. It has also been proposed that the risk of acute GVHD, which extends over many months, is related to the protracted survival of certain recipient APC. Human dermis contains three principal subsets of CD45(+)HLA-DR(+) cells: CD1a(+)CD14(-) DC, CD1a(-)CD14(+) DC, and CD1a(-)CD14(+)FXIIIa(+) macrophages. In vitro, each subset has characteristic properties. After transplantation, both CD1a(+) and CD14(+) DC are rapidly depleted and replaced by donor cells, but recipient macrophages can be found in GVHD lesions and may persist for many months. Macrophages isolated from normal dermis secrete proinflammatory cytokines. Although they stimulate little proliferation of naive or memory CD4(+) T cells, macrophages induce cytokine expression in memory CD4(+) T cells and activation and proliferation of CD8(+) T cells. These observations suggest that dermal macrophages and DC are from distinct lineages and that persistent recipient macrophages, although unlikely to initiate alloreactivity, may contribute to GVHD by sustaining the responses of previously activated T cells.

Graft-versus-host disease after donor leukocyte infusions: presentation and management

Donor leukocyte infusion (DLI) is used after both myeloablative and non-myeloablative stem-cell transplantation to treat and prevent relapse, to establish full donor chimerism, and to treat and prevent infections. The major treatment-related complication of DLI is graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). The presentation and treatment of GVHD after DLI is similar to its presentation and treatment after stem-cell transplantation, with some notable exceptions. While GVHD and graft-versus-tumor (GVT) effects are highly correlated after DLI, some patients experience remission without GVHD. Studies to define tumor-specific target antigens and GVT effector cells, as well as strategies of donor T-cell manipulation and optimization of DLI dose and schedule, may ultimately lead to the consistent ability to separate GVHD from GVT activity, improvement in the safety and specificity of DLI, and enhancement of the anti-tumor activity of donor T cells.

Donor lymphocyte infusions: the long and winding road: how should it be traveled?

Donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) often are used after allo-SCT to augment the graft-versus-tumor effect. Timing of infusion varies according to indication, for example to treat tumor recurrence, as a planned strategy to prevent disease relapse in the setting of T-cell-depleted grafts or non-myeloablative conditioning regimens, or as a method to convert mixed to full donor chimerism. The optimal strategy of timing, use of cytotoxic conditioning, cell dose and cell product composition, and so on, for DLI administration remains unclear. Despite varied techniques, DLI may lead to 3-year disease-free survivals (DFS) in excess of 60% for all CML patients and approach 90% in patients with only molecular or cytogenetic relapse. Other hematologic malignancies appear much less responsive, as less than 50% of patients respond and provide, at best, 3-year DFS rates of 20-50%. Multiple myeloma patients have overall response rates of 40-45% after DLI, suggesting benefit in relapsed disease, but limited experiences for diseases such as Hodgkin's lymphoma, myelodysplasia and ALL preclude recommendations for use of DLI at this time. Regardless of the indication, treatment-related mortality after DLI is 5-20% and more than one-third of patients will develop acute and/or chronic GVHD after DLI. The risks of these complications appear related, in part, to donor source, cell dose and therapy prior to DLI. Although there are no definitive answers, the information gleaned from published literature suggests that DLI should be administered early after relapse or as a prophylactic strategy in patients receiving T-cell-depleted grafts, and patients with bulky or aggressive disease may benefit from disease reduction prior to DLI.