Diagnostic Approach to Mesenchymal and Spindle Cell Tumors of the Breast

Mesenchymal and spindle cell tumors of the breast represent a broad and heterogeneous group of lesions that may be sampled on core needle biopsy or surgical excision. Mesenchymal lesions unique to the breast are those that derive from the specialized breast myofibroblast, such as mammary myofibroblastoma and pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia. However, any mesenchymal lesion arising in extramammary soft tissue may also arise in the breast, including fibroblastic, peripheral nerve sheath, adipocytic, and vascular lesions. The spindle cell lesions pose the greatest diagnostic challenge, due to the significant radiographic, morphologic, and immunophenotypic overlap within the category of mesenchymal lesions and more broadly with other nonmesenchymal breast lesions. The distinction is particularly challenging on the limited material of breast core needle biopsies, and caution should be taken before definitively classifying a breast spindle cell lesion on core needle biopsy to avoid unnecessary treatment if misdiagnosed. Consideration of a wide differential diagnosis, adequate sampling of a resection specimen, use of a targeted immunopanel, and selective use of molecular assays are essential steps for accurate classification of mesenchymal lesions in the breast. This review covers the clinical, histologic, and immunophenotypic features of mesenchymal tumors of the breast, with a special emphasis on the differential diagnoses unique to the breast and challenges encountered on breast core needle biopsy.

Mammary Myofibroblastoma: Report of a Case and Review of the Literature

Mammary myofibroblastoma is a benign mesenchymal tumor composed of fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, and a variable number of adipocytes. Mammary myofibroblastoma usually occurs in men of older age and is less common in postmenopausal women. It may also happen in extramammary sites along the milk line. In this instance, it is referred to as mammary-type myofibroblastoma. Rarely multifocal and bilateral tumors have been described. Clinically and radiologically, it can be misinterpreted as a malignant tumor due to its rarity. Size usually does not exceed 3 cm. The diagnosis requires clinicopathological correlation with morphological and immunohistochemical evaluation, especially in limited biopsy specimens. We herewith describe a rare case of mammary myofibroblastoma in a 37-year-old female patient. We also review the literature focusing on the potential differential diagnostic issues and discuss this tumor's ultrastructural and cytogenetic findings.

Clinicopathological and radiological characterization of myofibroblastoma of breast: A single institutional case review

Myofibroblastoma is a rare type of benign myofibroblastic neoplasm in the breast. It is clinically presented as a well-circumscribed mass, usually small in size (usually less than 4.0 cm), and can mostly be cured by local excision. Rare cases of giant myofibroblastoma greater than 10 cm have been reported, but also follow a benign clinical course. Histologically, breast myofibroblastoma is featured by bland fascicles of spindle cells intermixed with thick hyalinized collagen bundles. Mast cells are frequently found within the stroma. However, a wide spectrum of morphological variants can occur in myofibroblatoma, making its diagnosis challenging sometimes. Differential diagnosis of myofibroblastoma with other spindle cell lesions in the breast, either benign or malignant, is also important in practice. In this study, we collected 15 cases of breast myofibroblastoma diagnosed in our institution during a 20 year period. The sizes of these cases range from 0.4 cm to 35.2 cm (mean is 3.7 cm). To our knowledge, the case of giant breast myofibroblastoma we presented here is the largest one reported to date. The histological examination of the cases show great morphological variations. Besides the classical type, features of cellular, collagenized, palisading, epithelioid, myxoid, myoid, solitary fibrous tumor-like are also identified in the case series. Immunohistochemical staining patterns as well as clinical features of the cases are also summarized and compared. All cases in this study show no recurrence on follow-up. In addition, cases that are important differential diagnosis for breast myofibroblastoma are also studied. Their key histological characteristics are compared with myofibroblastoma, and their immunohistochemical and molecular features are discussed.

Differential Diagnosis of Benign Spindle Cell Lesions

Spindle cell lesions of the breast cover a wide spectrum of diseases ranging from reactive tumor-like lesions to high-grade malignant tumors. The recognition of the benign spindle cell tumor-like lesions (nodular fasciitis; reactive spindle cell nodule after biopsy, inflammatory pseudotumor/inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor; fascicular variant of pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia) and tumors (myofibroblastoma, benign fibroblastic spindle cell tumor, leiomyoma, schwannoma, spindle cell lipoma, solitary fibrous tumor, myxoma) is crucial to avoid confusion with morphologically similar but more aggressive bland-appearing spindle cell tumors, such as desmoid-type fibromatosis, low-grade (fibromatosis-like) spindle cell carcinoma, low-grade fibrosarcoma/myofibroblastic sarcoma and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans.

Epithelioid mammary myofibroblastoma mimicking invasive lobular carcinoma

A case of a 53-year-old woman with the epithelioid variant of mammary myofibroblastoma, which was initially misinterpreted as invasive lobular carcinoma, is presented. A needle core biopsy of the 1.6 cm mass showed interlacing bundles of epithelioid myofibroblasts amid dense fibrous tissue associated with lobular carcinoma in situ of the classical type. Most epithelioid cells showed nuclear atypia, and a few exhibited signet-ring cytology. Immunoreactivity for estrogen and progesterone receptors further compounded the deception, and the neoplasm was misinterpreted as invasive lobular carcinoma. Excisional biopsy showed a circumscribed stromal tumor with foci suspicious for invasive lobular carcinoma. The latter was excluded by cytokeratin negativity throughout the tumor. The overall histopathological appearance and immunostaining pattern was confirmatory of myofibroblastoma. This case report emphasizes the potential for mistaking epithelioid myofibroblastoma for invasive lobular carcinoma--particularly in the setting of limited sampling, hormone-receptor immunoreactivity of the lesional cells, and synchronous lobular carcinoma in situ.

Wilms' tumor protein (WT1) in mammary myofibroblastoma: an immunohistochemical study

Wilms' tumor protein (WT1) has been immunohistochemically detected in the cytoplasm of some developing, adult normal and neoplastic human tissues, suggesting its complex regulator activity in transcriptional/translational processes. Among neoplastic tissues, WT1 has been documented in the cytoplasm of benign and malignant vascular tumors and in rhabdomyosarcoma, while there are no available studies about its expression in myofibroblastic tumors. Accordingly, we studied immunohistochemically the potential expression of WT1 in mammary myofibroblastoma (MFB), a prototypical myofibroblastic tumor. A series of 18 cases of mammary MFB, including several morphological variants (classic, fibrotic, myxoid, lipomatous, Schwannian-like, and epithelioid variants), were tested with antibodies against the N-terminal of WT1. The most striking finding was a diffuse and strong WT1 cytoplasmic immunostaining restricted to the "epithelioid cell MFB", a rare and diagnostically challenging variant. Conversely the other variants of MFB, including the classic-type, were negative or only focally positive. The present study shows that mammary epithelioid cell MFB should be added to the list of mesenchymal tumors which express WT1 in the cytoplasm of neoplastic cells. Accordingly, we suggest that the detection of WT1 cytoplasmic immunoreactivity is of complementary diagnostic value to conventional myofibroblastic markers in identifying epithelioid cell myofibroblastoma.

Atypical epithelioid cell myofibroblastoma of the breast with multinodular growth pattern: a potential pitfall of malignancy

Myofibroblastoma (MFB) of the breast is the prototypical benign spindle cell tumor arising from the mammary stroma. Over the last two decades, several morphological variants of this tumor have been recognized. Epithelioid cell MFB is composed predominantly of neoplastic elements with epithelioid morphology. It represents a potential diagnostic pitfall of malignancy, especially when evaluating small biopsies. We report a unique case of a mammary epithelioid cell MFB composed of large mono- to multi-nucleated cells showing mild to moderate nuclear pleomorphism, predominantly arranged in a multinodular growth pattern. This tumor needs to be distinguished from invasive apocrine, oncocytic, pleomorphic lobular carcinoma, as well as metastases. Immunohistochemistry revealed the fibroblastic/myofibroblatic (positivity for vimentin, desmin, CD34 and focally for α-smooth muscle actin) nature of proliferating cells, and therefore was crucial for a correct diagnosis.

Mammary Myofibroblastoma: A Tumor With a Wide Morphologic Spectrum

Context.—Myofibroblastoma (MFB) of the breast is an unusual benign tumor that belongs to the family of the “benign spindle cell tumors of the mammary stroma.” The name MFB reflects its cellular composition, comprising mainly stromal cells with fibromyofibroblastic and, less frequently, myoid differentiation. Since the original description, the morphologic spectrum of MFB has been expanded by the recognition of several unusual morphologic variants, such as the cellular, infiltrative, epithelioid, deciduoid-like, lipomatous, collagenized/fibrous, and myxoid variants.

Objective.—To review the literature on mammary MFB, discussing the main clinical, radiologic, and pathologic features helpful for diagnosis. Since MFB may show alarming morphologic features, which can lead to a misdiagnosis of malignancy, histologic figures of this tumor, including its more unusual variants, are provided to offer pathologists a practical approach to a correct diagnosis. Histogenesis and pathogenesis of this tumor are also proposed.

Data Sources.—Clinicopathologic data on MFB were extracted from all identified articles through PUB Medline– based research. Histologic figures have been taken from the personal archive of the author.

Conclusions.—The incidence of MFB diagnosis has increased in recent years, likely due to the mammographic screening. Accordingly, this unusual benign tumor may represent a potential diagnostic pitfall, especially when interpreting fine-needle aspiration and/or needle core biopsy. Pathologists should be aware of the wide morphologic spectrum exhibited by MFB to avoid a misdiagnosis of malignancy.