Breast cancer in the elderly: a histological assessment

Bronchial cytology of pulmonary adenoid cystic carcinoma - A multi-institute series with emphasis on immunocytochemistry

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary adenoid cystic carcinoma (AdCC) is a central and superficial primary lung neoplasm, well-suited for sampling by bronchial cytology. This study aims to review the cytologic features of pulmonary AdCC on bronchial cytology, and to report an experience of applying immunocytochemistry on this rare entity.

METHODS

A multi-institute review of bronchial cytology specimens from histologically proven pulmonary AdCCs was performed. Published cases of bronchial cytology of pulmonary AdCC were reviewed. The cytologic features and immunocytochemical profile for pulmonary AdCC was summarized and compared with pertinent differentials.

RESULTS

A total of 16 specimens from eight patients were retrieved. The initial cytologic diagnoses were negative (n = 7), atypia (n = 6), suspicious (n = 2) and AdCC (n = 1). Retrospective review showed eight bronchial cytology specimens (including five cases of atypia) with tumor cells present. The tumor cells displayed small basaloid nuclei with occasional small nucleoli, mild nuclear atypia, and scanty cytoplasm. Architectural patterns observed included clusters, tubules, solid sheets, three-dimensional balls, papillary-like fronds, and complex cribriform structures. Basement-membrane-like material, free or associated with tumor cells, were seen in all cases. Immunocytochemistry was performed in one specimen. MYB was positive. TTF-1, synaptophysin and chromogranin were negative. Epithelial and basal markers demonstrated a dual cell population. Literature review yielded 28 cases. Cytologic features described were similar except for cytoplasmic vacuolation in one case.

CONCLUSION

Basement membrane-like material is specific for AdCC. MYB positivity, TTF-1 and neuroendocrine marker negativity, support a diagnosis of AdCC. Other immunocytochemistry and cytologic features overlap significantly with adenocarcinoma and small cell carcinoma of lung.

Primary neuroendocrine tumors of the breast: two case reports and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine carcinomas mainly affect the bronchopulmonary and the gastrointestinal systems. Breast localizations are very rare. They represent less than 0.1% of all breast cancers. A definitive diagnosis relies on histological and immunohistochemical examinations.

CASE PRESENTATION

Case 1 We report a case of primary neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast in a 71-year-old Arabic woman who presented with a 3 cm palpable and mobile tumor of the right breast. Clinical and radiological assessment excluded any other primary tumor. Radical mastectomy and axillary lymph node resection were performed. A histopathological examination disclosed the diagnosis of primary breast neuroendocrine tumors, with negative surgical margins and lymph nodes (18 N-/18 N). The tumor cells were positive for neuroendocrine markers, a weak Ki-67 proliferation index and negative Her2/neu. Our patient received adjuvant hormonal treatment with anti-aromatase for 21 months. She is on regular follow-up, and she remains free of disease to date. Case 2 A 48-year-old Arabic woman consulted for a right breast nodule. She underwent lumpectomy with right axillary lymphadenectomy. The diagnosis was breast neuroendocrine tumor. Systemic treatment was proposed, but she was lost to follow-up. She consulted 1 year later for a mass in the same breast. A histological and immunohistochemical examination of a mammary biopsy was consistent with a recurrence of the previous neuroendocrine tumor. A radiological assessment showed a large mass in her right breast, ipsilateral axillary lymphadenopathies, and hepatic and pulmonary metastases. She received first-line metastatic chemotherapy, with good clinical and radiological improvement. She refused the mastectomy and was given hormone therapy. One year later, the tumor expanded clinically and radiologically, and she underwent second-line metastatic chemotherapy, with good clinical progress and radiological stability, and she then underwent maintenance hormonal therapy.

CONCLUSION

Due to the rarity of primary breast neuroendocrine tumors, no standard therapy exists and the prognosis remains difficult to determine. Studies, including larger series, are needed in order to understand the biological behavior of these tumors.

Primary breast carcinomas with neuroendocrine features: Clinicopathological features and analysis of tumor growth patterns in 36 cases

Primary breast carcinoma with neuroendocrine features (NEBC) is an uncommon tumor. In the classification of WHO 2012, these tumors were categorized as: 1- neuroendocrine tumor, well-differentiated; 2- neuroendocrine carcinoma, poorly differentiated/small cell carcinoma; and 3- invasive breast carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation. In this study, we reviewed NEBC except poorly differentiated/small cell carcinoma variant in order to define the morphological growth patterns and cytonuclear details of these tumors. All breast surgical excision materials between 2007 and 2016 were re-evaluated in terms of neuroendocrine differentiation. Thirty-six cases showing positive staining for synaptophysin and/or chromogranin A in ≥50% of tumor cells were included in the study. All cases were female with a mean age of 67.4. Mean tumor diameter was 26 mm. Multifocality was noted in 5 cases. Grossly, they were mostly infiltrative mass lesions. T stages, identified in 34 cases, were as follows: 13 cases with pT1; 19 pT2 and 2 pT3. We described schematically 4 types of patterns depending on predominant growth pattern, except one case: 1) Large-sized solid cohesive groups (6 cases), 2) Small- to medium-sized solid cohesive groups with trabeculae/ribbons and glandular structures (6 cases), 3) Mixed growth patterns (20 cases), 4) Invasive tumor with prominent extracellular and/or intracellular mucin (3 cases). The tumor cells were mostly polygonal-oval with eosinophilic/eosinophilic-granular cytoplasm. The nuclei of tumor cells were mostly round to oval with evenly distributed chromatin. Only 5 cases showed high grade nuclear and histological features. Molecular subtypes of the cases were as follows: 33 luminal A, 2 luminal B, and 1 triple negative. NEBC should come to mind when a tumor display one of the morphological patterns described above, composed of monotonous cells with mild to moderate nuclear pleomorphism and abundant eosinophilic/eosinophilic granular or clear cytoplasm, especially in elderly patients.

How many diseases is triple negative breast cancer: the protagonism of the immune microenvironment

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a type of breast cancer (BC) that does not express the oestrogen and the progesterone receptors and the human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2). Since there are no positive markers to reliably classify TNBC, these tumours are not yet treated with targeted therapies. Perhaps for this reason they are the most aggressive form of breast carcinomas. However, the clinical observation that these patients do not carry a uniformly dismal prognosis, coupled with data coming from pathology and epidemiology, suggests that this negative definition is not capturing a single clinical entity, but several. We critically evaluate this evidence in this paper, reviewing clinical and epidemiological data and new studies that aim to subclassify TNBC. Moreover, evidence on the role of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) on TNBC progression, response to chemotherapy and patient outcome have been published. The heterogeneity, observed even at TILs level, highlights the idea that TNBC is much more than a single disease with a unique treatment. The exploration of the immune environment present at the tumour site could indeed help in answering the question 'How many diseases is TNBC' and will help to define prognosis and eventually develop new therapies, by stimulating the immune effector cells or by inhibiting immunological repressor molecules. In this review, we focus on the prospect of the patient's diverse immune signatures within the tumour as potential biomarkers and how they could be modulated to fight the disease.

Breast cancer in elderly women and altered clinico-pathological characteristics: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women in terms of incidence and mortality. Age is undoubtedly the biggest breast cancer risk factor. In this study we examined clinical, histological, and biological characteristics and mortality of breast cancer in elderly women along with their changes with advancing age.

METHODS

We reviewed 63 original articles published between 2006 and 2016 concerning women over 70 years with breast cancer.

RESULTS

Compared to patients 70-79 years, patients aged 80 and over had larger tumor size with fewer T1 (42.9% vs 57.7%, p < 0.01) and more T2 lesions (43.5% vs 33.0%, p < 0.01). Lymph nodes and distant metastases were more frequent, with more N + (49.5% vs 44.0%, p < 0.01) and more M1 (8.0% vs 5.9%, p < 0.01). Infiltrating mucinous carcinomas were more frequent (4.3% vs 3.7%, p < 0.01). Tumors had lower grades, with more grade 1 (23.2% vs 19.8%, p = 0.01) and fewer grade 3 (21.5% vs 25.5%, p < 0.01), and were more hormone-sensitive: PR was more often expressed (72.6% vs 67.3%, p < 0.01). Lympho-vascular invasion was less frequent in the 80 years and over (22.9% vs 29.7%, p = 0.01). Breast cancer-specific mortality was higher both at 5 years (25.8% vs 17.2%, p < 0.01) and 10 years (32.7% vs 26.6%, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Clinico-pathological characteristics, increased incidence, and mortality associated with aging can be explained on one hand by biological changes of the breast such as increased estrogen sensitivity, epithelial cell alterations, immune senescence, and tumor microenvironment modifications. However, sociologic factors such as increased life expectancy, under-treatment, late diagnosis, and insufficient individual screening, are also involved.

Biology of primary breast cancer in older women treated by surgery: with correlation with long-term clinical outcome and comparison with their younger counterparts

Background:

As age advances breast cancer appears to change its biological characteristics, however, very limited data are available to define the precise differences between older and younger patients.

Methods:

Over 36 years (1973–2009), 1758 older (⩾70 years) women with early operable primary breast cancer were managed in a dedicated clinic. In all, 813 underwent primary surgery and 575 good quality tumour samples were available for biological analysis. The pattern of biomarkers was analysed using indirect immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays. Comparison was made with a previously characterised series of younger (<70 years) patients.

Results:

There was high expression of oestrogen receptor (ER), PgR, Bcl2, Muc1, BRCA1 and 2, E-cadherin, luminal cytokeratins, HER3, HER4, MDM2 and 4 and low expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2, Ki67, p53, EGFR and CK17. Oestrogen receptor and axillary stage appeared as independent prognostic factors. Unsupervised partitional clustering showed six biological clusters in older patients, five of which were common in the younger patients, whereas the low ER luminal cluster was distinct in the older series. The luminal phenotype showed better breast cancer-specific survival, whereas basal and HER2-overexpressing tumours were associated with poor outcome.

Conclusion:

Early operable primary breast cancer in older women appears as a distinct biological entity, with existence of a novel cluster. Overall older women showed less aggressive tumour biology and ER appeared as an independent prognostic factor alongside the time-dependent axillary stage. These biological characteristics may explain the differences in clinical outcome and should be considered in making therapeutic decisions.

Current targeted therapies in breast cancer: clinical applications in the elderly woman

The incidence of breast cancer is two to three times higher in women aged ≥65 years than in the whole population, whereas their mortality rate is threefold to fourfold higher. Targeted therapies allow significantly longer disease-free survival times. Nevertheless, in an elderly population, these treatments need to be prescribed with caution. This paper reviews the treatments of breast cancer in the elderly, and the issues of targeted therapies and their toxicities. Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2(+) breast cancer benefit from trastuzumab; although cardiotoxic effects are observed in <5% of patients when given alone, they affect ~25% of patients when combined with anthracyclines. Bevacizumab leads to a longer progression-free survival time and lower risk for progression in patients with metastatic breast cancer when added to paclitaxel or docetaxel. Although generally well tolerated, it is associated with a higher risk for arterial thromboembolism and hypertension. Lapatinib is approved for the treatment of advanced or metastatic breast cancer in patients not responding to trastuzumab, combined with capecitabine chemotherapy. The most frequent side effects concern the gastrointestinal system and dermatologic symptoms. The life expectancy of breast cancer patients should be taken into account to determine the appropriateness of treatments. The quality of life of elderly cancer patients must be assessed with an appropriate tool. Older patients exhibit greater vulnerability, suggesting identification and exclusion of patients at high cardiac risk. Future recommendations for the treatment of elderly women with breast cancer should include a multidisciplinary approach and a global geriatric assessment before treatment with anti-HER-2 therapy or bevacizumab.

Neuroendocrine differentiation in breast cancer: established facts and unresolved problems

Neuroendocrine breast carcinoma (NEBC) diagnosis relies on (i) presence of morphologic neuroendocrine features, and (ii) neuroendocrine markers expressed in more than 50% of tumor cells. The World Health Organization classification describes 3 main histologic types: the solid, the small/oat cell, and the large cell variant. In addition, we have recently proposed a further categorization into 5 subgroups: the first 3 categories encompass solid lesions and include (i) solid cohesive carcinomas, (ii) alveolar carcinomas, and (iii) small cell carcinoma; the last subgroups include mucin-producing tumors which are (iv) solid papillary carcinomas and (v) cellular mucinous carcinomas. Chromogranin A and synaptophysin have been considered as the most sensitive and specific neuroendocrine markers in NEBC. At the molecular level, recent gene expression profiling studies have shown that NEBCs pertain to the luminal molecular type, being positive for hormone receptors and negative for HER2. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that mucinous and neuroendocrine carcinomas are transcriptionally distinct from conventional invasive ductal carcinomas. Following the above criteria, NEBCs constitute approximately 1% of all breast carcinomas. The clinical effect of neuroendocrine breast cancer is still a matter of debate; however, when compared with unselected breast cancers, NEBCs show a less aggressive clinical behavior.