Forespore-specific disappearance of the sigma-factor antagonist spoIIAB: implications for its role in determination of cell fate in Bacillus subtilis

Transcription and translation of the sigG gene is tuned for proper execution of the switch from early to late gene expression in the developing Bacillus subtilis spore

A cascade of alternative sigma factors directs developmental gene expression during spore formation by the bacterium Bacillus subtilis. As the spore develops, a tightly regulated switch occurs in which the early-acting sigma factor σ^F is replaced by the late-acting sigma factor σ^G. The gene encoding σ^G (sigG) is transcribed by σ^F and by σ^G itself in an autoregulatory loop; yet σ^G activity is not detected until σ^F-dependent gene expression is complete. This separation in σ^F and σ^G activities has been suggested to be due at least in part to a poorly understood intercellular checkpoint pathway that delays sigG expression by σ^F. Here we report the results of a careful examination of sigG expression during sporulation. Unexpectedly, our findings argue against the existence of a regulatory mechanism to delay sigG transcription by σ^F and instead support a model in which sigG is transcribed by σ^F with normal timing, but at levels that are very low. This low-level expression of sigG is the consequence of several intrinsic features of the sigG regulatory and coding sequence—promoter spacing, secondary structure potential of the mRNA, and start codon identity—that dampen its transcription and translation. Especially notable is the presence of a conserved hairpin in the 5’ leader sequence of the sigG mRNA that occludes the ribosome-binding site, reducing translation by up to 4-fold. Finally, we demonstrate that misexpression of sigG from regulatory and coding sequences lacking these features triggers premature σ^G activity in the forespore during sporulation, as well as inappropriate σ^G activity during vegetative growth. Altogether, these data indicate that transcription and translation of the sigG gene is tuned to prevent vegetative expression of σ^G and to ensure the precise timing of the switch from σ^F to σ^G in the developing spore.

Global changes in gene expression occur during normal cellular growth and development, as well as during cancer cell transformation and bacterial pathogenesis. In this study we have investigated the molecular mechanisms that drive the switch from early to late developmental gene expression during spore formation by the model bacterium Bacillus subtilis. At early times, gene expression in the developing spore is directed by the transcription factor σ^F; at later times σ^F is replaced by σ^G. An important, yet poorly understood aspect of this σ^F-to-σ^G transition is how σ^G activation is delayed until the early, σ^F-directed phase of gene expression is complete. Here we have carefully examined expression of the gene encoding σ^G, sigG, and found that its transcription and translation are ordinarily dampened by several features of its regulatory and coding sequences. Moreover, we have found that this “tuning” of sigG expression is required for proper timing of the switch to σ^G. These results reframe our understanding of how sigG is regulated during B. subtilis sporulation and, more broadly, advance our understanding of how global changes in gene expression can be precisely executed at the molecular/genetic level.

Dual-specificity anti-sigma factor reinforces control of cell-type specific gene expression in Bacillus subtilis

Gene expression during spore development in Bacillus subtilis is controlled by cell type-specific RNA polymerase sigma factors. σ^Fand σ^E control early stages of development in the forespore and the mother cell, respectively. When, at an intermediate stage in development, the mother cell engulfs the forespore, σ^F is replaced by σ^G and σ^E is replaced by σ^K. The anti-sigma factor CsfB is produced under the control of σ^F and binds to and inhibits the auto-regulatory σ^G, but not σ^F. A position in region 2.1, occupied by an asparagine in σ^G and by a glutamate in ο^F, is sufficient for CsfB discrimination of the two sigmas, and allows it to delay the early to late switch in forespore gene expression. We now show that following engulfment completion, csfB is switched on in the mother cell under the control of σ^K and that CsfB binds to and inhibits σ^E but not σ^K, possibly to facilitate the switch from early to late gene expression. We show that a position in region 2.3 occupied by a conserved asparagine in σ^E and by a conserved glutamate in σ^K suffices for discrimination by CsfB. We also show that CsfB prevents activation of σ^G in the mother cell and the premature σ^G-dependent activation of σ^K. Thus, CsfB establishes negative feedback loops that curtail the activity of σ^E and prevent the ectopic activation of σ^G in the mother cell. The capacity of CsfB to directly block σ^E activity may also explain how CsfB plays a role as one of the several mechanisms that prevent σ^E activation in the forespore. Thus the capacity of CsfB to differentiate between the highly similar σ^F/σ^G and σ^E/σ^K pairs allows it to rinforce the cell-type specificity of these sigma factors and the transition from early to late development in B. subtilis, and possibly in all sporeformers that encode a CsfB orthologue.

Precise temporal and cell-type specific regulation of gene expression is required for development of differentiated cells even in simple organisms. Endospore development by the bacterium Bacillus subtilis involves only two types of differentiated cells, a forespore that develops into the endospore, and a mother cell that nurtures the developing endospore. During development temporal and cell-type specific regulation of gene expression is controlled by transcription factors called sigma factors (σ). An anti-sigma factor known as CsfB binds to σ^G to prevent its premature activity in the forespore. We found that CsfB is also expressed in the mother cell where it blocks ectopic activity of σ^G, and blocks the activity σ^E to allow σ^K to take over control of gene expression during the final stages of development. Our finding that CsfB directly blocks σ^E activity also explains how CsfB plays a role in preventing ectopic activity of σ^E in the forespore. Remarkably, each of the major roles of CsfB, (i.e., control of ectopic σ^G and σ^E activities, and the temporal limitation of σ^E activity) is also accomplished by redundant regulatory processes. This redundancy reinforces control of key regulatory steps to insure reliability and stability of the developmental process.

Coupling of σG activation to completion of engulfment during sporulation of Bacillus subtilis survives large perturbations to DNA translocation and replication

Spore formation in Bacillus subtilis is characterized by activation of RNA polymerase sigma factors, including the late-expressed σ(G). During spore formation an asymmetric division occurs, yielding the smaller prespore and the larger mother cell. At division, only 30% of the chromosome is in the prespore, and the rest is then translocated into the prespore. Following completion of engulfment of the prespore by the mother cell, σ(G) is activated in the prespore. Here we tested the link between engulfment and σ(G) activation by perturbing DNA translocation and replication, which are completed before engulfment. One approach was to have large DNA insertions in the chromosome; the second was to have an impaired DNA translocase; the third was to use a strain in which the site of termination of chromosome replication was relocated. Insertion of 2.3 Mb of Synechocystis DNA into the B. subtilis genome had the largest effect, delaying engulfment by at least 90 min. Chromosome translocation was also delayed and was completed shortly before the completion of engulfment. Despite the delay, σ(G) became active only after the completion of engulfment. All results are consistent with a strong link between completion of engulfment and σ(G) activation. They support a link between completion of chromosome translocation and completion of engulfment.

A negative feedback loop that limits the ectopic activation of a cell type-specific sporulation sigma factor of Bacillus subtilis

Two highly similar RNA polymerase sigma subunits, σ^F and σ^G, govern the early and late phases of forespore-specific gene expression during spore differentiation in Bacillus subtilis. σ^F drives synthesis of σ^G but the latter only becomes active once engulfment of the forespore by the mother cell is completed, its levels rising quickly due to a positive feedback loop. The mechanisms that prevent premature or ectopic activation of σ^G while discriminating between σ^F and σ^G in the forespore are not fully comprehended. Here, we report that the substitution of an asparagine by a glutamic acid at position 45 of σ^G (N45E) strongly reduced binding by a previously characterized anti-sigma factor, CsfB (also known as Gin), in vitro, and increased the activity of σ^G in vivo. The N45E mutation caused the appearance of a sub-population of pre-divisional cells with strong activity of σ^G. CsfB is normally produced in the forespore, under σ^F control, but sigGN45E mutant cells also expressed csfB and did so in a σ^G-dependent manner, autonomously from σ^F. Thus, a negative feedback loop involving CsfB counteracts the positive feedback loop resulting from ectopic σ^G activity. N45 is invariant in the homologous position of σ^G orthologues, whereas its functional equivalent in σ^F proteins, E39, is highly conserved. While CsfB does not bind to wild-type σ^F, a E39N substitution in σ^F resulted in efficient binding of CsfB to σ^F. Moreover, under certain conditions, the E39N alteration strongly restrains the activity of σ^F in vivo, in a csfB-dependent manner, and the efficiency of sporulation. Therefore, a single amino residue, N45/E39, is sufficient for the ability of CsfB to discriminate between the two forespore-specific sigma factors in B. subtilis.

Positive auto-regulation of a transcriptional activator during cell differentiation or development often allows the rapid and robust deployment of cell- and stage-specific genes and the routing of the differentiating cell down a specific path. Positive auto-regulation however, raises the potential for inappropriate activity of the transcription factor. Here we unravel the role of a previously characterized anti-sigma factor, CsfB, in a negative feedback loop that prevents ectopic expression of the sporulation-specific sigma factor σ^G of Bacillus subtilis. σ^G is activated in the forespore, one of the two chambers of the developing cell, at an intermediate stage in spore development. Once active, a positive feedback loop allows the rapid accumulation of σ^G. Synthesis of both σ^G and CsfB is under the control of the early forespore regulator σ^F, and CsfB may help prevent the premature activity of σ^G in the forespore. However, CsfB is also produced under σ^G control in non-sporulating cells, setting a negative feedback loop that we show limits its ectopic activation. We further show that an asparagine residue conserved among σ^G orthologues is critical for binding and inhibition by CsfB, whereas the exclusion of asparagine from the homologous position in σ^F confers immunity to CsfB.

Processing of a membrane protein required for cell-to-cell signaling during endospore formation in Bacillus subtilis

Activation of the late prespore-specific RNA polymerase sigma factor sigma(G) during Bacillus subtilis sporulation coincides with completion of the engulfment process, when the prespore becomes a protoplast fully surrounded by the mother cell cytoplasm and separated from it by a double membrane system. Activation of sigma(G) also requires expression of spoIIIJ, coding for a membrane protein translocase of the YidC/Oxa1p/Alb3 family, and of the mother cell-specific spoIIIA operon. Here we present genetic and biochemical evidence indicating that SpoIIIAE, the product of one of the spoIIIA cistrons, and SpoIIIJ interact in the membrane, thereby linking the function of the spoIIIJ and spoIIIA loci in the activation of sigma(G). We also show that SpoIIIAE has a functional Sec-type signal peptide, which is cleaved during sporulation. Furthermore, mutations that reduce or eliminate processing of the SpoIIIAE signal peptide arrest sporulation following engulfment completion and prevent activation of sigma(G). SpoIIIJ-type proteins can function in cooperation with or independently of the Sec system. In one model, SpoIIIJ interacts with SpoIIIAE in the context of the Sec translocon to promote its correct localization and/or topology in the membrane, so that it can signal the activation of sigma(G) following engulfment completion.

A novel pathway of intercellular signalling in Bacillus subtilis involves a protein with similarity to a component of type III secretion channels

During spore formation in Bacillus subtilis, sigma(E)-directed gene expression in the mother-cell compartment of the sporangium triggers the activation of sigma(G) in the forespore by a pathway of intercellular signalling that is composed of multiple proteins of unknown function. Here, we confirm that the vegetative protein SpoIIIJ, the forespore protein SpoIIQ and eight membrane proteins (SpoIIIAA through SpoIIIAH) produced in the mother cell under the control of sigma(E) are ordinarily required for intercellular signalling. In contrast, an anti-sigma(G) factor previously implicated in the pathway is shown to be dispensable. We also present evidence suggesting that SpoIIIJ is a membrane protein translocase that facilitates the insertion of SpoIIIAE into the membrane. In addition, we report the isolation of a mutation that partially bypasses the requirement for SpoIIIJ and for SpoIIIAA through SpoIIIAG, but not for SpoIIIAH or SpoIIQ, in the activation of sigma(G). We therefore propose that under certain genetic conditions, SpoIIIAH and SpoIIQ can constitute a minimal pathway for the activation of sigma(G). Finally, based on the similarity of SpoIIIAH to a component of type III secretion systems, we speculate that signalling is mediated by a channel that links the mother cell to the forespore.

Polar localization and compartmentalization of ClpP proteases during growth and sporulation in Bacillus subtilis

Spatial control of proteolysis is emerging as a common feature of regulatory networks in bacteria. In the spore-forming bacterium Bacillus subtilis, the peptidase ClpP can associate with any of three ATPases: ClpC, ClpE, and ClpX. Here, we report that ClpCP, ClpEP, and ClpXP localize in foci often near the poles of growing cells and that ClpP and the ATPase are each capable of polar localization independently of the other component. A region of ClpC containing an AAA domain was necessary and sufficient for polar localization. We also report that ClpCP and ClpXP proteases differentially localize to the forespore and mother cell compartments of the sporangium during spore formation. Moreover, model substrates for each protease created by appending recognition sequences for ClpCP or ClpXP to the green fluorescent protein were preferentially eliminated from the forespore or the mother cell, respectively. Biased accumulation of ClpCP in the forespore may contribute to the cell-specific activation of the transcription factor sigma(F) by preferential ClpCP-dependent degradation of the anti-sigma(F) factor SpoIIAB.

How the early sporulation sigma factor sigmaF delays the switch to late development in Bacillus subtilis

Sporulation in Bacillus subtilis is a primitive differentiation process involving two cell types, the forespore and the mother cell. Each cell implements two successive transcription programmes controlled by specific sigma factors. We report that activity of sigma(G), the late forespore sigma factor, is kept in check by Gin, the product of csfB, a gene controlled by sigma(F), the early forespore sigma factor. Gin abolishes sigma(G) transcriptional activity when sigma(G) is artificially synthesized during growth, but has no effect on sigma(F). Gin interacts strongly with sigma(G) but not with sigma(F) in a yeast two-hybrid experiment. The absence of Gin allows sigma(G) to be active during sporulation independently of the mother-cell development to which it is normally coupled. Premature sigma(G) activity leads to the formation of slow-germinating spores, and complete deregulation of sigma(G) synthesis is lethal when combined with gin inactivation. Gin allows sigma(F) to delay the switch to the late forespore transcription programme by preventing sigma(G) to take over before the cell has reached a critical stage of development. A similar strategy, following a completely unrelated route, is used by the mother cell.

Blocking chromosome translocation during sporulation of Bacillus subtilis can result in prespore-specific activation of sigmaG that is independent of sigmaE and of engulfment

Formation of spores by Bacillus subtilis is characterized by cell compartment-specific gene expression directed by four RNA polymerase sigma factors, which are activated in the order sigma(F)-sigma(E)-sigma(G)-sigma(K). Of these, sigma(G) becomes active in the prespore upon completion of engulfment of the prespore by the mother cell. Transcription of the gene encoding sigma(G), spoIIIG, is directed in the prespore by RNA polymerase containing sigma(F) but also requires the activity of sigma(E) in the mother cell. When first formed, sigma(G) is not active. Its activation requires expression of additional sigma(E)-directed genes, including the genes required for completion of engulfment. Here we report conditions in which sigma(G) becomes active in the prespore in the absence of sigma(E) activity and of completion of engulfment. The conditions are (i) having an spoIIIE mutation, so that only the origin-proximal 30% of the chromosome is translocated into the prespore, and (ii) placing spoIIIG in an origin-proximal location on the chromosome. The main function of the sigma(E)-directed regulation appears to be to coordinate sigma(G) activation with the completion of engulfment, not to control the level of sigma(G) activity. It seems plausible that the role of sigma(E) in sigma(G) activation is to reverse some inhibitory signal (or signals) in the engulfed prespore, a signal that is not present in the spoIIIE mutant background. It is not clear what the direct activator of sigma(G) in the prespore is. Competition for core RNA polymerase between sigma(F) and sigma(G) is unlikely to be of major importance.

Control of the expression and compartmentalization of (sigma)G activity during sporulation of Bacillus subtilis by regulators of (sigma)F and (sigma)E

During formation of spores by Bacillus subtilis the RNA polymerase factor sigma(G) ordinarily becomes active during spore formation exclusively in the prespore upon completion of engulfment of the prespore by the mother cell. Formation and activation of sigma(G) ordinarily requires prior activity of sigma(F) in the prespore and sigma(E) in the mother cell. Here we report that in spoIIA mutants lacking both sigma(F) and the anti-sigma factor SpoIIAB and in which sigma(E) is not active, sigma(G) nevertheless becomes active. Further, its activity is largely confined to the mother cell. Thus, there is a switch in the location of sigma(G) activity from prespore to mother cell. Factors contributing to the mother cell location are inferred to be read-through of spoIIIG, the structural gene for sigma(G), from the upstream spoIIG locus and the absence of SpoIIAB, which can act in the mother cell as an anti-sigma factor to sigma(G). When the spoIIIG locus was moved away from spoIIG to the distal amyE locus, sigma(G) became active earlier in sporulation in spoIIA deletion mutants, and the sporulation septum was not formed, suggesting that premature sigma(G) activation can block septum formation. We report a previously unrecognized control in which SpoIIGA can prevent the appearance of sigma(G) activity, and pro-sigma(E) (but not sigma(E)) can counteract this effect of SpoIIGA. We find that in strains lacking sigma(F) and SpoIIAB and engineered to produce active sigma(E) in the mother cell without the need for SpoIIGA, sigma(G) also becomes active in the mother cell.

Compartmentalization of gene expression during Bacillus subtilis spore formation

Gene expression in members of the family Bacillaceae becomes compartmentalized after the distinctive, asymmetrically located sporulation division. It involves complete compartmentalization of the activities of sporulation-specific sigma factors, sigma(F) in the prespore and then sigma(E) in the mother cell, and then later, following engulfment, sigma(G) in the prespore and then sigma(K) in the mother cell. The coupling of the activation of sigma(F) to septation and sigma(G) to engulfment is clear; the mechanisms are not. The sigma factors provide the bare framework of compartment-specific gene expression. Within each sigma regulon are several temporal classes of genes, and for key regulators, timing is critical. There are also complex intercompartmental regulatory signals. The determinants for sigma(F) regulation are assembled before septation, but activation follows septation. Reversal of the anti-sigma(F) activity of SpoIIAB is critical. Only the origin-proximal 30% of a chromosome is present in the prespore when first formed; it takes approximately 15 min for the rest to be transferred. This transient genetic asymmetry is important for prespore-specific sigma(F) activation. Activation of sigma(E) requires sigma(F) activity and occurs by cleavage of a prosequence. It must occur rapidly to prevent the formation of a second septum. sigma(G) is formed only in the prespore. SpoIIAB can block sigma(G) activity, but SpoIIAB control does not explain why sigma(G) is activated only after engulfment. There is mother cell-specific excision of an insertion element in sigK and sigma(E)-directed transcription of sigK, which encodes pro-sigma(K). Activation requires removal of the prosequence following a sigma(G)-directed signal from the prespore.

Role of the anti-sigma factor SpoIIAB in regulation of sigmaG during Bacillus subtilis sporulation

RNA polymerase sigma factor sigma(F) initiates the prespore-specific program of gene expression during Bacillus subtilis sporulation. sigma(F) governs transcription of spoIIIG, encoding the late prespore-specific regulator sigma(G). However, transcription of spoIIIG is delayed relative to other genes under the control of sigma(F), and after synthesis, sigma(G) is initially kept in an inactive form. Activation of sigma(G) requires the complete engulfment of the prespore by the mother cell and expression of the spoIIIA and spoIIIJ loci. We screened for random mutations in spoIIIG that bypassed the requirement for spoIIIA for the activation of sigma(G). We found a mutation (spoIIIGE156K) that resulted in an amino acid substitution at position 156, which is adjacent to the position of a mutation (E155K) previously shown to prevent interaction of SpoIIAB with sigma(G). Comparative modelling techniques and in vivo studies suggested that the spoIIIGE156K mutation interferes with the interaction of SpoIIAB with sigma(G). The sigma(GE156K) isoform restored sigma(G)-directed gene expression to spoIIIA mutant cells. However, expression of sspE-lacZ in the spoIIIA spoIIIGE156K double mutant was delayed relative to completion of the engulfment process and was not confined to the prespore. Rather, beta-galactosidase accumulated throughout the entire cell at late times in development. This suggests that the activity of sigma(GE156K) is still regulated in the prespore of a spoIIIA mutant, but not by SpoIIAB. In agreement with this suggestion, we also found that expression of spoIIIGE156K from the promoter for the early prespore-specific gene spoIIQ still resulted in sspE-lacZ induction at the normal time during sporulation, coincidently with completion of the engulfment process. In contrast, transcription of spoIIIGE156K, but not of the wild-type spoIIIG gene, from the mother cell-specific spoIID promoter permitted the rapid induction of sspE-lacZ expression. Together, the results suggest that SpoIIAB is either redundant or has no role in the regulation of sigma(G) in the prespore.

Temporal and spatial regulation in prokaryotic cell cycle progression and development

Bacteria exhibit a high degree of intracellular organization, both in the timing of essential processes and in the placement of the chromosome, the division site, and individual structural and regulatory proteins. We examine the temporal and spatial regulation of the Caulobacter cell cycle, bacterial chromosome segregation and cytokinesis, and Bacillus subtilis sporulation. Mechanisms that control timing of cell cycle and developmental events include transcriptional cascades, regulated phosphorylation and proteolysis of signal transduction proteins, transient genetic asymmetry, and intercellular communication. Surprisingly, many signal transduction proteins are dynamically localized to specific subcellular addresses during the cell division cycle and sporulation, and proper localization is essential for their function. The Min proteins that govern division site selection in Escherichia coli may be the first example of a system that generates positional information de novo.

Regulation of endospore formation in Bacillus subtilis

Spore formation in bacteria poses a number of biological problems of fundamental significance. Asymmetric cell division at the onset of sporulation is a powerful model for studying basic cell-cycle problems, including chromosome segregation and septum formation. Sporulation is one of the best understood examples of cellular development and differentiation. Fascinating problems posed by sporulation include the temporal and spatial control of gene expression, intercellular communication and various aspects of cell morphogenesis.

Analysis of the interaction between the transcription factor sigmaG and the anti-sigma factor SpoIIAB of Bacillus subtilis

The activation of sigma(G), a transcription factor, in Bacillus subtilis is coupled to the completion of engulfment during sporulation. SpoIIAB, an anti-sigma factor involved in regulation of sigma(F), is also shown to form a complex with sigma(G) in vitro. SpoIIAA, the corresponding anti-anti-sigma factor, can disrupt the SpoIIAB:sigma(G) complex, releasing free sigma(G). The data suggest the existence of an as-yet-unknown mechanism to keep sigma(G) inactive prior to engulfment.

Expression of spoIIIJ in the prespore is sufficient for activation of sigma G and for sporulation in Bacillus subtilis

During sporulation in Bacillus subtilis, the prespore-specific developmental program is initiated soon after asymmetric division of the sporangium by the compartment-specific activation of RNA polymerase sigma factor sigma(F). sigma(F) directs transcription of spoIIIG, encoding the late forespore-specific regulator sigma(G). Following synthesis, sigma(G) is initially kept in an inactive form, presumably because it is bound to the SpoIIAB anti-sigma factor. Activation of sigma(G) occurs only after the complete engulfment of the prespore by the mother cell. Mutations in spoIIIJ arrest sporulation soon after conclusion of the engulfment process and prevent activation of sigma(G). Here we show that sigma(G) accumulates but is mostly inactive in a spoIIIJ mutant. We also show that expression of the spoIIIGE155K allele, encoding a form of sigma(G) that is not efficiently bound by SpoIIAB in vitro, restores sigma(G)-directed gene expression to a spoIIIJ mutant. Expression of spoIIIJ occurs during vegetative growth. However, we show that expression of spoIIIJ in the prespore is sufficient for sigma(G) activation and for sporulation. Mutations in the mother cell-specific spoIIIA locus are known to arrest sporulation just after completion of the engulfment process. Previous work has also shown that sigma(G) accumulates in an inactive form in spoIIIA mutants and that the need for spoIIIA expression for sigma(G) activation can be circumvented by the spoIIIGE155K allele. However, in contrast to the case for spoIIIJ, we show that expression of spoIIIA in the prespore does not support efficient sporulation. The results suggest that the activation of sigma(G) at the end of the engulfment process involves the action of spoIIIA from the mother cell and of spoIIIJ from the prespore.

Analysis of the Bacillus subtilis spoIIIJ gene and its Paralogue gene, yqjG

The Bacillus subtilis spoIIIJ gene, which has been proven to be vegetatively expressed, has also been implicated as a sporulation gene. Recent genome sequencing information in many organisms reveals that spoIIIJ and its paralogous gene, yqjG, are conserved from prokaryotes to humans. A homologue of SpoIIIJ/YqjG, the Escherichia coli YidC is involved in the insertion of membrane proteins into the lipid bilayer. On the basis of this similarity, it was proposed that the two homologues act as translocase for the membrane proteins. We studied the requirements for spoIIIJ and yqjG during vegetative growth and sporulation. In rich media, the growth of spoIIIJ and yqjG single mutants were the same as that of the wild type, whereas spoIIIJ yqjG double inactivation was lethal, indicating that together these B. subtilis translocase homologues play an important role in maintaining the viability of the cell. This result also suggests that SpoIIIJ and YqjG probably control significantly overlapping functions during vegetative growth. spoIIIJ mutations have already been established to block sporulation at stage III. In contrast, disruption of yqjG did not interfere with sporulation. We further show that high level expression of spoIIIJ during vegetative phase is dispensable for spore formation, but the sporulation-specific expression of spoIIIJ is necessary for efficient sporulation even at the basal level. Using green fluorescent protein reporter to monitor SpoIIIJ and YqjG localization, we found that the proteins localize at the cell membrane in vegetative cells and at the polar and engulfment septa in sporulating cells. This localization of SpoIIIJ at the sporulation-specific septa may be important for the role of spoIIIJ during sporulation.

Crystal structure of the Bacillus stearothermophilus anti-sigma factor SpoIIAB with the sporulation sigma factor sigmaF

Cell type-specific transcription during Bacillus sporulation is established by sigmaF. SpoIIAB is an anti-sigma that binds and negatively regulates sigmaF, as well as a serine kinase that phosphorylates and inactivates the anti-anti-sigma SpoIIAA. The crystal structure of sigmaF bound to the SpoIIAB dimer in the low-affinity, ADP form has been determined at 2.9 A resolution. SpoIIAB adopts the GHKL superfamily fold of ATPases and histidine kinases. A domain of sigmaF contacts both SpoIIAB monomers, while 80% of the sigma factor is disordered. The interaction occludes an RNA polymerase binding surface of sigmaF, explaining the SpoIIAB anti-sigma activity. The structure also explains the specificity of SpoIIAB for its target sigma factors and, in combination with genetic and biochemical data, provides insight into the mechanism of SpoIIAA anti-anti-sigma activity.

Development of a two-part transcription probe to determine the completeness of temporal and spatial compartmentalization of gene expression during bacterial development

We have developed a two-part test, using the Bacillus subtilis sacB/SacY transcription antitermination system, to evaluate the completeness of temporal and spatial compartmentalization of gene expression during bacterial cell development. Transcription of sacY(1-55) (encoding a constitutively active form of the antiterminator, SacY) is directed by one promoter, whereas transcription of sacB'-'lacZ (the target of SacY action) is directed by the same or another promoter. To obtain beta-galactosidase activity, SacY(1-55) needs to be present when sacB'-'lacZ is being transcribed. We tested the system by analyzing the spatial compartmentalization of the activities of RNA polymerase final sigma factors, which are tightly regulated during sporulation of B. subtilis: final sigma(F) and then final sigma(G) in the prespore, final sigma(E) and then final sigma(K) in the mother cell. We have confirmed that the activities of final sigma(F) and final sigma(E) are spatially compartmentalized. We have demonstrated that there is also sharp temporal compartmentalization, with little or no overlap in the activities of final sigma(F) and final sigma(G) or of final sigma(E) and final sigma(K). In contrast, we found no compartmentalization of the activity of the main vegetative factor, final sigma(A), which continued to be active alongside all of the sporulation-specific final sigma factors. We also found no temporal compartmentalization of expression of loci that are activated during the development of competent cells of B. subtilis, a developmental program distinct from spore formation. A possible mechanism to explain the temporal compartmentalization of final sigma(F) and final sigma(G) activities is that the anti-sigma factor SpoIIAB transfers from final sigma(G) to final sigma(F).

Forespore-specific transcription of the lonB gene during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis

The Bacillus subtilis genome encodes two members of the Lon family of prokaryotic ATP-dependent proteases. One, LonA, is produced in response to temperature, osmotic, and oxidative stress and has also been implicated in preventing sigma(G) activity under nonsporulation conditions. The second is encoded by the lonB gene, which resides immediately upstream from lonA. Here we report that transcription of lonB occurs during sporulation under sigma(F) control and thus is restricted to the prespore compartment of sporulating cells. First, expression of a lonB-lacZ transcriptional fusion was abolished in strains unable to produce sigma(F) but remained unaffected upon disruption of the genes encoding the early and late mother cell regulators sigma(E) and sigma(K) or the late forespore regulator sigma(G). Second, the fluorescence of strains harboring a lonB-gfp fusion was confined to the prespore compartment and depended on sigma(F) production. Last, primer extension analysis of the lonB transcript revealed -10 and -35 sequences resembling the consensus sequence recognized by sigma(F)-containing RNA polymerase. We further show that the lonB message accumulated as a single monocistronic transcript during sporulation, synthesis of which required sigma(F) activity. Disruption of the lonB gene did not confer any discernible sporulation phenotype to otherwise wild-type cells, nor did expression of lonB from a multicopy plasmid. In contrast, expression of a fusion of the lonB promoter to the lonA gene severely reduced expression of the sigma(G)-dependent sspE gene and the frequency of sporulation. In confirmation of earlier observations, we found elevated levels of sigma(F)-dependent activity in a spoIIIE47 mutant, in which the lonB region of the chromosome is not translocated into the prespore. Expression of either lonB or the P(lonB)-lonA fusion from a plasmid in the spoIIIE47 mutant reduced sigma(F) -dependent activity to wild-type levels. The results suggest that both LonA and LonB can prevent abnormally high sigma(F) activity but that only LonA can negatively regulate sigma(G).

Sigma factor displacement from RNA polymerase during Bacillus subtilis sporulation

As Bacillus subtilis proceeds through sporulation, the principal vegetative cell sigma subunit (sigma(A)) persists in the cell but is replaced in the extractable RNA polymerase (RNAP) by sporulation-specific sigma factors. To explore how this holoenzyme changeover might occur, velocity centrifugation techniques were used in conjunction with Western blot analyses to monitor the associations of RNAP with sigma(A) and two mother cell sigma factors, sigma(E) and sigma(K), which successively replace sigma(A) on RNAP. Although the relative abundance of sigma(A) with respect to RNAP remained virtually unchanged during sporulation, the percentage of the detectable sigma(A) which cosedimented with RNAP fell from approximately 50% at the onset of sporulation (T(0)) to 2 to 8% by 3 h into the process (T(3)). In a strain that failed to synthesize sigma(E), the first of the mother cell-specific sigma factors, approximately 40% of the sigma(A) remained associated with RNAP at T(3). The level of sigma(A)-RNAP cosedimentation dropped to less than 10% in a strain which synthesized a sigma(E) variant (sigma(ECR119)) that could bind to RNAP but was unable to direct sigma(E)-dependent transcription. The E-sigma(E)-to-E-sigma(K) changeover was characterized by both the displacement of sigma(E) from RNAP and the disappearance of sigma(E) from the cell. Analyses of extracts from wild-type and mutant B. subtilis showed that the sigma(K) protein is required for the displacement of sigma(E) from RNAP and also confirmed that sigma(K) is needed for the loss of the sigma(E) protein. The results indicate that the successive appearance of mother cell sigma factors, but not necessarily their activities, is an important element in the displacement of preexisting sigma factors from RNAP. It suggests that competition for RNAP by consecutive sporulation sigma factors may be an important feature of the holoenzyme changeovers that occur during sporulation.

sigmaK can negatively regulate sigE expression by two different mechanisms during sporulation of Bacillus subtilis

Temporal and spatial gene regulation during Bacillus subtilis sporulation involves the activation and inactivation of multiple sigma subunits of RNA polymerase in a cascade. In the mother cell compartment of sporulating cells, expression of the sigE gene, encoding the earlier-acting sigma factor, sigmaE, is negatively regulated by the later-acting sigma factor, sigmaK. Here, it is shown that the negative feedback loop does not require SinR, an inhibitor of sigE transcription. Production of sigmaK about 1 h earlier than normal does affect Spo0A, which when phosphorylated is an activator of sigE transcription. A mutation in the spo0A gene, which bypasses the phosphorelay leading to the phosphorylation of Spo0A, diminished the negative effect of early sigmaK production on sigE expression early in sporulation. Also, early production of sigmaK reduced expression of other Spo0A-dependent genes but not expression of the Spo0A-independent ald gene. In contrast, both sigE and ald were overexpressed late in development of cells that fail to make sigmaK. The ald promoter, like the sigE promoter, is believed to be recognized by sigmaA RNA polymerase, suggesting that sigmaK may inhibit sigmaA activity late in sporulation. To exert this negative effect, sigmaK must be transcriptionally active. A mutant form of sigmaK that associates with core RNA polymerase, but does not direct transcription of a sigmaK-dependent gene, failed to negatively regulate expression of sigE or ald late in development. On the other hand, the negative effect of early sigmaK production on sigE expression early in sporulation did not require transcriptional activity of sigmaK RNA polymerase. These results demonstrate that sigmaK can negatively regulate sigE expression by two different mechanisms, one observed when sigmaK is produced earlier than normal, which does not require sigmaK to be transcriptionally active and affects Spo0A, and the other observed when sigmaK is produced at the normal time, which requires sigmaK RNA polymerase transcriptional activity. The latter mechanism facilitates the switch from sigmaE to sigmaK in the cascade controlling mother cell gene expression.

Isolation and characterization of Bacillus subtilis sigB operon mutations that suppress the loss of the negative regulator RsbX

sigmaB, a transcription factor that controls the Bacillus subtilis general stress response regulon, is activated by either a drop in intracellular ATP or exposure to environmental stress. RsbX, one of seven sigmaB regulators (Rsb proteins) whose genes are cotranscribed with sigmaB, is a negative regulator in the stress-dependent activation pathway. To better define the interactions that take place among the Rsb proteins, we analyzed sigB operon mutations which suppress the high-level sigmaB activity that normally accompanies the loss of RsbX. Each of these mutations was in one of three genes (rsbT, -U, and -V) which encode positive regulators of sigmaB, and they all defined amino acid changes which either compromised the activities of the mutant Rsbs or affected their ability to accumulate. sigmaB activity remained inducible by ethanol in several of the RsbX- suppressor strains. This finding supports the notion that RsbX is not needed as the target for sigmaB activation by at least some stresses. sigmaB activity in several RsbX- strains with suppressor mutations in rsbT or -U was high during growth and underwent a continued, rather than a transient, increase following stress. Thus, RsbX is likely responsible for maintaining low sigmaB activity during balanced growth and for reestablishing sigmaB activity at prestress levels following induction. Although RsbX likely participates in limiting the sigmaB induction response, a second mechanism for curtailing unrestricted sigmaB activation was suggested by the sigmaB induction profile in two suppressor strains with mutations in rsbV. sigmaB activity in these mutants was stress inducible but transient, even in the absence of RsbX.

Molecular genetics of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis

The process of sporulation in the bacterium Bacillus subtilis proceeds through a well-defined series of morphological stages that involve the conversion of a growing cell into a two-cell-chamber sporangium within which a spore is produced. Over 125 genes are involved in this process, the transcription of which is temporally and spatially controlled by four DNA-binding proteins and five RNA polymerase sigma factors. Through a combination of genetic, biochemical, and cell biological approaches, regulatory networks have been elucidated that explicitly link the activation of these sigma factors to landmark events in the course of morphogenesis and to each other through pathways of intercellular communication. Signals targeting proteins to specific subcellular localizations and governing the assembly of macromolecular structures have been uncovered but their nature remains to be determined.

Reactivation of the Bacillus subtilis anti-sigma B antagonist, RsbV, by stress- or starvation-induced phosphatase activities

sigma B is a secondary sigma factor that controls the general stress regulon in Bacillus subtilis. The regulon is activated when sigma B is released from a complex with an anti-sigma B protein (RsbW) and becomes free to associate with RNA polymerase. Two separate mechanisms cause sigma B release: an ATP-responsive mechanism that correlates with nutritional stress and an ATP-independent mechanism that responds to environmental insult (e.g., heat shock and ethanol treatment). ATP levels are thought to directly affect RsbW's binding preference. Low levels of ATP cause RsbW to release sigma B and bind to an alternative protein (RsbV), while high levels of ATP favor RsbW-sigma B complex formation and inactivation of RsbV by an RsbW-dependent phosphorylation. During growth, most of the RsbV is phosphorylated (RsbV-P) and inactive. Environmental stress induces the release of sigma B and the formation of the RsbW-RsbV complex, regardless of ATP levels. This pathway requires the products of additional genes encoded within the eight-gene operon (sigB) that includes the genes for sigma B, RsbW, and RsbV. By using isoelectric focusing techniques to distinguish RsbV from RsbV-P and chloramphenicol treatment or pulse-chase labeling to identify preexisting RsbV-P, we have now determined that stress induces the dephosphorylation of RsbV-P to reactivate RsbV. RsbV-P was also found to be dephosphorylated upon a drop in intracellular ATP levels. The stress-dependent and ATP-responsive dephosphorylations of RsbV-P differed in their requirements for the products of the first four genes (rsbR, -S, -T, and -U) of the sigB operon. Both dephosphorylation reactions required at least one of the genes included in a deletion that removed rsbR, -S, and -T; however, only an environmental insult required RsbU to reactivate RsbV.

Relative levels and fractionation properties of Bacillus subtilis σ(B) and its regulators during balanced growth and stress

sigma B is a secondary sigma factor that controls the general stress response in Bacillus subtilis. sigma B-dependent genes are activated when sigma B is released from an inhibitory complex with an anti-sigma B protein (RsbW) and becomes free to associate with RNA polymerase. Two separate pathways, responding either to a drop in intracellular ATP levels or to environmental stress (e.g., heat, ethanol, or salt), cause the release of sigma B from RsbW. rsbR, rsbS, rsbT, and rsbU are four genes now recognized as the upstream half of an operon that includes sigB (sigma B) and its principal regulators. Using reporter gene assays, we find that none of these four genes are essential for stationary-phase (i.e., ATP-dependent) activation of sigma B, but rsbU and one or more of the genes contained within an rsbR,S,T deletion are needed for stress induction of sigma B. In other experiments, Western blot (immunoblot) analyses showed that the levels of RsbR, RsbS, Rsb, and RsbU, unlike those of the sigB operon's four downstream gene products (RsbV, RsbW, RsbX and sigma B), are not elevated during sigma B activation. Gel filtration and immunoprecipitation studies did not reveal the formation of complexes between any of the four upstream sigB operon products and the products of the downstream half of the operon. Much of the detectable RsbR, RsbS, RsbT, and RsbU did, however, fractionate as a large-molecular-mass (approximately 600-kDa) aggregate which was excluded from our gel filtration matrix. The downstream sigB operon products were not present in this excluded material. The unaggregated RsbR, RsbS, and RsbU, which were retarded by the gel matrix, elated from the column earlier than expected from their molecular weights. The RsbR and RsbS fractionation profile was consistent with homodimers (60 and 30 kDa, respectively), while the RsbU appeared larger, suggesting a protein complex of approximately 90 to 100 kDa.

Bacterial differentiation: sizing up sporulation

New results on Bacillus subtilis sporulation suggest that size differences between the post-septation compartments trigger differential gene expression, which is then coordinated by communication between the nascent mother cell and forespore compartments.

sigma B-dependent regulation of gsiB in response to multiple stimuli in Bacillus subtilis

The expression of the gsiB gene of Bacillus subtilis in response to a wide variety of stress conditions was analysed, and the results provide evidence that gsiB is subject to a sigma B-dependent regulation. Primer extension experiments established identical start points for gsiB transcription during growth and after the induction by heat shock, salt or ethanol stress, and glucose limitation. The sequence upstream of the transcription start point shows great similarity to the sequences of sigma B-dependent promoters of B. subtilis. sigma B was absolutely required for the increase in gsiB mRNA level and in the synthesis rate of GsiB in response to various stimuli. Measurements of the ATP pool indicated that changes in the level of ATP might be one of the signals that regulate the activity of sigma B in B. subtilis.

Separate mechanisms activate sigma B of Bacillus subtilis in response to environmental and metabolic stresses

sigma B is a secondary sigma factor that controls the general stress response of Bacillus subtilis. sigma B-dependent transcription is induced by the activation of sigma B itself, a process that involves release of sigma B from an inhibitory complex with its primary regulator, RsbW. sigma B becomes available to RNA polymerase when RsbW forms a complex with an additional regulatory protein (RsbV) and, because of this, fails to bind sigma B. Using Western blot (immunoblot) analyses, reporter gene fusion assays, and measurements of nucleotide pool sizes, we provide evidence for two independent processes that promote the binding of RsbW to RsbV. The first occurs during carbon limitation or entry into stationary phase. Activation of sigma B under these circumstances correlates with a drop in the intracellular levels of ATP and may be a direct consequence of ATP levels on RsbW's binding preference. The second activation process relies on the product of a third regulatory gene, rsbU. RsbU is dispensable for sigma B activation during carbon limitation or stationary phase but is needed for activation of sigma B in response to any of a number of different environmental insults (ethanol treatment, salt or acid shock, etc.). RsbU, or a process dependent on it, alters RsbW binding without regard for intracellular levels of ATP. In at least some instances, the effects of multiple inducing stimuli are additive. The data are consistent with RsbW being a regulator at which distinct signals from separate effectors can be integrated to modulate sigma B activity.

The role of anti-sigma factors in gene regulation

Despite the isolation of an anti-sigma factor over 20 years ago, it is only recently that the concept of an anti-sigma factor emerged as a general mechanism of transcriptional regulation in prokaryotic systems. Anti-sigma factors bind to sigma factors and inhibit their transcriptional activity. Studies on the mechanism of action of anti-sigma factors has shed new light on the regulation of gene expression in bacteria, as the anti-sigma factors add another layer to transcriptional control via negative regulation. Their cellular roles are as diverse as FIgM of Salmonella typhimurium, which can be exported to sense the structural state of the flagellar organelle, to SpoIIAB of Bacillus subtilis participating in the switch from one cell type to another during the process of sporulation. Additionally, the bacteriophage T4 uses an anti-sigma factor to sabotage the Escherichia coli E.sigma 70 RNA polymerase in order to direct exclusive transcription of its own genes. Cross-linking, co-immunoprecipitations, and co-purification indicate that the anti-sigma factors directly interact with their corresponding sigma factor to negatively regulate transcription. In B. subtilis, anti anti-sigma factors regulate anti-sigma factors by preventing an anti-sigma factor from interacting with its cognate sigma factors, thereby allowing transcription to occur.

The sigma factors of Bacillus subtilis

The specificity of DNA-dependent RNA polymerase for target promotes is largely due to the replaceable sigma subunit that it carries. Multiple sigma proteins, each conferring a unique promoter preference on RNA polymerase, are likely to be present in all bacteria; however, their abundance and diversity have been best characterized in Bacillus subtilis, the bacterium in which multiple sigma factors were first discovered. The 10 sigma factors thus far identified in B. subtilis directly contribute to the bacterium's ability to control gene expression. These proteins are not merely necessary for the expression of those operons whose promoters they recognize; in many instances, their appearance within the cell is sufficient to activate these operons. This review describes the discovery of each of the known B. subtilis sigma factors, their characteristics, the regulons they direct, and the complex restrictions placed on their synthesis and activities. These controls include the anticipated transcriptional regulation that modulates the expression of the sigma factor structural genes but, in the case of several of the B. subtilis sigma factors, go beyond this, adding novel posttranslational restraints on sigma factor activity. Two of the sigma factors (sigma E and sigma K) are, for example, synthesized as inactive precursor proteins. Their activities are kept in check by "pro-protein" sequences which are cleaved from the precursor molecules in response to intercellular cues. Other sigma factors (sigma B, sigma F, and sigma G) are inhibited by "anti-sigma factor" proteins that sequester them into complexes which block their ability to form RNA polymerase holoenzymes. The anti-sigma factors are, in turn, opposed by additional proteins which participate in the sigma factors' release. The devices used to control sigma factor activity in B, subtilis may prove to be as widespread as multiple sigma factors themselves, providing ways of coupling sigma factor activation to environmental or physiological signals that cannot be readily joined to other regulatory mechanisms.

The Bacillus subtilis rsbU gene product is necessary for RsbX-dependent regulation of sigma B

sigma B is a secondary sigma factor of Bacillus subtilis. sigma B-dependent transcription is induced when B. subtilis enters the stationary phase of growth or is exposed to any of a number of different environmental stresses. Three genes (rsbV, rsbW, and rsbX), which are cotranscribed with the sigma B structural gene (sigB), encode regulators of sigma B-dependent gene expression. RsbW and RsbV have been shown to control sigma B activity, functioning as an inhibitory sigma B binding protein and its antagonist, respectively. Using the SPAC promoter (PSPAC) to control the expression of the sigB operon, a ctc::lacZ reporter system to monitor sigma B activity, and monoclonal antibodies to determine the levels of sigB operon products, we have now obtained evidence that RsbX is an indirect regulator of sigma B activity. Genetic data and in vivo measurements argue that RsbX negatively regulates an extension of the RsbV-RsbW pathway that requires the product of an additional regulatory gene (rsbU) which lies immediately upstream of the sigB operon. The results are consistent with RsbU, or a process dependent on RsbU, being able to facilitate the RsbV-dependent release of sigma B from RsbW but normally prevented from doing this by RsbX.

Bacillus subtilis lon protease prevents inappropriate transcription of genes under the control of the sporulation transcription factor sigma G

The Bacillus subtilis RNA polymerase sigma factor sigma G is a cell-type-specific regulatory protein that governs the transcription of genes that are expressed at an intermediate to late stage of sporulation in the forespore compartment of the sporangium. Here we report the identification of a mutation (lon-1) that causes inappropriate transcription of genes under the control of sigma G under nutritional and genetic conditions in which sporulation is prevented. The mutation is located at 245 degrees on the genetic map and lies within a newly identified open reading frame that is predicted to encode a homolog to Lon protease. Inappropriate transcription of sigma G-controlled genes in the lon-1 mutant is not prevented by mutations in genes that are normally required for the appearance of sigma G during sporulation but is prevented by a mutation in the structural gene (spoIIIG) for sigma G itself. In light of previous work showing that spoIIIG is subject to positive autoregulation, we propose that Lon protease is responsible (possibly by causing degradation of sigma G) for preventing sigma G-directed transcription of spoIIIG and hence the accumulation of sigma G in cells that are not undergoing sporulation. An integrated physical and genetic map is presented that encompasses 36 kb of uninterrupted DNA sequence from the lon pheA region of the chromosome, corresponding to 245 degrees to 239 degrees on the genetic map.

Establishment of cell type specific gene transcription during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis

Asymmetric cell division during the process of sporulation in the bacterium Bacillus subtilis generates dissimilar progeny that exhibit distinct programs of gene transcription. Recent work reveals a partner switching mechanism that governs the activity of the sporulation regulatory protein sigma F and that may be responsible for the establishment of cell type specific gene transcription.

Mutations in pts cause catabolite-resistant sporulation and altered regulation of spo0H in Bacillus subtilis

A mutation in Bacillus subtilis, ggr-31, that relieves glucose-glutamine-dependent control of a spoVG-lacZ translational fusion was isolated and was subsequently found to confer a pleiotropic phenotype. Mutants cultured in glucose- and glutamine-rich media exhibited a Crs- (catabolite-resistant sporulation) phenotype; enhanced expression of the spo0H gene, encoding sigma H, as evidenced by immunoblot analysis with anti-sigma H antiserum; and derepression of srfA, an operon involved in surfactin biosynthesis and competence development. In addition, ggr-31 mutants exhibited a significant increase in generation time when they were cultured in minimal glucose medium. The mutant phenotype was restored to the wild type by Campbell integration of a plasmid containing part of the ptsG (encoding the enzyme II/III glucose permease) gene, indicating that the mutation probably resides within ptsG and adversely affects glucose uptake. A deletion mutation within ptsI exhibited a phenotype similar to that of ggr-31.

Interactions between a Bacillus subtilis anti-sigma factor (RsbW) and its antagonist (RsbV)

The activity of sigma B, a secondary sigma factor of Bacillus subtilis, is primarily controlled by an anti-sigma factor protein (RsbW) that binds to sigma B and blocks its ability to form an RNA polymerase holoenzyme (E-sigma B). Inhibition of sigma B by RsbW is counteracted by RsbV, a protein that is essential for the activation of sigma B-dependent transcription. When crude B. subtilis extracts were fractionated by gel filtration chromatography or electrophoresis through nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels, a complex composed of RsbW and RsbV that is distinct from the previously observed RsbW-sigma B complex was detected. In analogous experiments, RsbX, an additional regulator of sigma B-dependent transcription that is thought to act independently of RsbV-RsbW, was not found to associate with any of the other sigB operon products. Two forms of RsbV were visualized when crude cell extracts of B. subtilis were subjected to isoelectric focusing (IEF), with the more negatively charged RsbV species absent from extracts prepared from RsbW- strains. In vitro, RsbV became phosphorylated when incubated with ATP and RsbW but not with ATP alone. The phosphorylated RsbV species comigrated during IEF with the RsbW-dependent form of RsbV found in crude cell extracts. These results suggest that the modified RsbV, present in crude cell extracts, is phosphorylated. When gel filtration fractions containing RsbV-RsbW complexes or RsbV alone were subjected to IEF, only the unmodified form of RsbV was found associated with RsbW. The presumed phosphorylated variant of RsbV was present only in fractions that did not contain RsbW. The data support a model whereby RsbV binds directly to RsbW and blocks its ability to form the RsbW-sigma B complex. This activity of RsbV appears to be inhibited by RsbW-dependent phosphorylation.

Multilevel regulation of the sporulation transcription factor sigma K in Bacillus subtilis

Gene expression in the mother-cell compartment of the Bacillus subtilis sporangium is governed in part by the sporulation transcription factor sigma K. The production of sigma K is controlled at three levels: by a chromosomal rearrangement that generates the sigma K-coding sequence (sigK), by compartment-specific transcription of sigK, and by conversion of the inactive pro-protein product of sigK (pro-sigma K) to sigma K. To investigate the function of these multiple levels of regulation, we constructed a set of strains that bypass the chromosomal rearrangement, pro-protein processing, or both levels of control. Here we show that one of the functions of the chromosomal rearrangement and pro-protein processing is to prevent inappropriate production of sigma K under nonsporulation conditions. In the absence of both of these levels of control, a low level of sigma K-directed gene expression is observed during stationary phase after growth in rich medium. The appearance of sigma K under these conditions is probably due to a low level of sigma K-directed transcription from the sigK promoter in a positive feedback loop. We also report the construction of a strain that produces high levels of sigma K during growth. Using this strain, we demonstrate that the production of sigma K during growth is sufficient to induce a cascade of gene expression that closely mimics late events in the mother-cell line of gene expression.