Oral administration of a centrally acting ghrelin receptor agonist to conscious rats triggers defecation

Gut Hormones as Potential Therapeutic Targets or Biomarkers of Response in Depression: The Case of Motilin

Recent research has identified the gut–brain axis as a key mechanistic pathway and potential therapeutic target in depression. In this paper, the potential role of gut hormones as potential treatments or predictors of response in depression is examined, with specific reference to the peptide hormone motilin. This possibility is explored through two methods: (1) a conceptual review of the possible links between motilin and depression, including evidence from animal and human research as well as clinical trials, based on a literature search of three scientific databases, and (2) an analysis of the relationship between a functional polymorphism (rs2281820) of the motilin (MLN) gene and cross-national variations in the prevalence of depression based on allele frequency data after correction for potential confounders. It was observed that (1) there are several plausible mechanisms, including interactions with diet, monoamine, and neuroendocrine pathways, to suggest that motilin may be relevant to the pathophysiology and treatment of depression, and (2) there was a significant correlation between rs2281820 allele frequencies and the prevalence of depression after correcting for multiple confounding factors. These results suggest that further evaluation of the utility of motilin and related gut peptides as markers of antidepressant response is required and that these molecular pathways represent potential future mechanisms for antidepressant drug development.

Central pattern generators in the brainstem and spinal cord: an overview of basic principles, similarities and differences

Central pattern generators (CPGs) are generally defined as networks of neurons capable of enabling the production of central commands, specifically controlling stereotyped, rhythmic motor behaviors. Several CPGs localized in brainstem and spinal cord areas have been shown to underlie the expression of complex behaviors such as deglutition, mastication, respiration, defecation, micturition, ejaculation, and locomotion. Their pivotal roles have clearly been demonstrated although their organization and cellular properties remain incompletely characterized. In recent years, insightful findings about CPGs have been made mainly because (1) several complementary animal models were developed; (2) these models enabled a wide variety of techniques to be used and, hence, a plethora of characteristics to be discovered; and (3) organizations, functions, and cell properties across all models and species studied thus far were generally found to be well-preserved phylogenetically. This article aims at providing an overview for non-experts of the most important findings made on CPGs in in vivo animal models, in vitro preparations from invertebrate and vertebrate species as well as in primates. Data about CPG functions, adaptation, organization, and cellular properties will be summarized with a special attention paid to the network for locomotion given its advanced level of characterization compared with some of the other CPGs. Similarities and differences between these networks will also be highlighted.

Regulation of Gastrointestinal Motility by Motilin and Ghrelin in Vertebrates

The energy balance of vertebrates is regulated by the difference in energy input and energy expenditure. Generally, most vertebrates obtain their energy from nutrients of foods through the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Therefore, food intake and following food digestion, including motility of the GI tract, secretion and absorption, are crucial physiological events for energy homeostasis. GI motility changes depending on feeding, and GI motility is divided into fasting (interdigestive) and postprandial (digestive) contraction patterns. GI motility is controlled by contractility of smooth muscles of the GI tract, extrinsic and intrinsic neurons (motor and sensory) and some hormones. In mammals, ghrelin (GHRL) and motilin (MLN) stimulate appetite and GI motility and contribute to the regulation of energy homeostasis. GHRL and MLN are produced in the mucosal layer of the stomach and upper small intestine, respectively. GHRL is a multifunctional peptide and is involved in glucose metabolism, endocrine/exocrine functions and cardiovascular and reproductive functions, in addition to feeding and GI motility in mammals. On the other hand, the action of MLN is restricted and species such as rodentia, including mice and rats, lack MLN peptide and its receptor. From a phylogenetic point of view, GHRL and its receptor GHS-R1a have been identified in various vertebrates, and their structural features and various physiological functions have been revealed. On the other hand, MLN or MLN-like peptide (MLN-LP) and its receptors have been found only in some fish, birds and mammals. Here, we review the actions of GHRL and MLN with a focus on contractility of the GI tract of species from fish to mammals.

A Comparison of the Central versus Peripheral Gastrointestinal Prokinetic Activity of Two Novel Ghrelin Mimetics

The gastrointestinal (GI) prokinetic effects of ghrelin occur through direct peripheral effects on ghrelin receptors within the enteric nervous system and via the ghrelin receptor on the vagus nerve, which activate a centrally mediated mechanism. However, the relative contribution of peripheral versus central effects to the overall prokinetic effect of ghrelin agonists requires further investigation. Here, we investigated the central versus peripheral prokinetic effect of ghrelin by using two novel ghrelin agonists: HM01 (N'-[(1S)-1-(2,3-dichloro-4-methoxyphenyl)ethyl]-N-methyl-N-[1,3,3-trimethyl-(4R)-piperidyl]-urea HCL) with high brain penetration compared with HM02 (N'-[(1S)-1-(2,3-dichloro-4-methoxyphenyl)ethyl]-N-hydroxy-N-(1-methyl-4-piperidinyl)-urea), a more peripherally acting ghrelin agonist. The pharmacokinetic profiles of both ghrelin agonists were evaluated after intravenous and oral administration in rats. The efficacy of HM01 and HM02 was assessed in a rat model of postoperative ileus (POI) induced by abdominal surgery and in a rodent defecation assay. Pharmacokinetic results in our models confirmed that HM01, but not HM02, was a brain-penetrant ghrelin agonist. Administration of either HM01 or HM02 reversed the delayed upper and lower gastrointestinal transit induced by abdominal surgery to levels resembling the non-POI controls. In the defecation test, HM01, but not HM02, significantly increased the weight of fecal pellets. Our findings suggest that, in a rodent model of POI, synthetic ghrelin agonists stimulate GI transit through a peripheral site of action. However, in the defecation assay, our data suggest that a ghrelin-mediated mechanism is located at a central site. Taken together, a ghrelin agonist with both central and peripheral prokinetic activity may show therapeutic potential to treat delayed GI transit disorders.

Local regulatory mechanism to coordinate colorectal motility in rats

The presence of a fecal pellet in the colorectum causes ascending contraction and descending relaxation, propelling the pellet aborally. However, random occurrence of the reflexes at multiple sites would disturb sequential excretion of the pellets, resulting in inefficient defecation. Hence, we postulated that a regulatory mechanism to coordinate peristaltic motility initiated at adjacent portions of the colorectum may exist. Colorectal motility was recorded with balloons located at 2 cm, 5 cm and 7 cm from the anus in vivo in anesthetized rats. The presence of a balloon in the colorectum inhibited motility of the oral side and enhanced motility of the anal side. Both the ascending inhibitory and descending facilitatory actions were unaffected by cutting the pelvic nerves, suggesting little contribution of the lumbosacral defecation center. In contrast, disrupting the continuity of the enteric nervous system abolished the local reflex mechanism. The ascending inhibitory pathway operated in a condition in which facilitatory input from the lumbosacral defecation center was fully activated by intrathecal injection of ghrelin. We also found that functional impairment of the local reflex pathways was evident in rats that recovered from 2,4,6-trinitrobenzensulfonic acid-induced colitis. These results demonstrate that an intrinsic regulatory mechanism to coordinate peristaltic motility initiated at adjacent portions exists in the rat colorectum. The regulation may be beneficial to propel multiple pellets efficiently. In addition, impairment of the local regulatory mechanism might be involved in postinflammatory dysmotility in the colorectum.

Evidence that central pathways that mediate defecation utilize ghrelin receptors but do not require endogenous ghrelin

In laboratory animals and in human, centrally penetrant ghrelin receptor agonists, given systemically or orally, cause defecation. Animal studies show that the effect is due to activation of ghrelin receptors in the spinal lumbosacral defecation centers. However, it is not known whether there is a physiological role of ghrelin or the ghrelin receptor in the control of defecation. Using immunohistochemistry and immunoassay, we detected and measured ghrelin in the stomach, but were unable to detect ghrelin by either method in the lumbosacral spinal cord, or other regions of the CNS. In rats in which the thoracic spinal cord was transected 5 weeks before, the effects of a ghrelin agonist on colorectal propulsion were significantly enhanced, but defecation caused by water avoidance stress (WAS) was reduced. In knockout rats that expressed no ghrelin and in wild‐type rats, WAS‐induced defecation was reduced by a ghrelin receptor antagonist, to similar extents. We conclude that the ghrelin receptors of the lumbosacral defecation centers have a physiological role in the control of defecation, but that their role is not dependent on ghrelin. This implies that a transmitter other than ghrelin engages the ghrelin receptor or a ghrelin receptor complex.

Ghrelin and Motilin Control Systems in GI Physiology and Therapeutics

Ghrelin and motilin are released from gastrointestinal endocrine cells during hunger, to act through G protein-coupled receptors that have closely related amino acid sequences. The actions of ghrelin are more complex than motilin because ghrelin also exists outside the GI tract, it is processed to des-acyl ghrelin which has activity, ghrelin can exist in truncated forms and retain activity, the ghrelin receptor can have constitutive activity and is subject to biased agonism and finally additional ghrelin-like and des-acyl ghrelin receptors are proposed. Both ghrelin and motilin can stimulate gastric emptying, acting via different pathways, perhaps influenced by biased agonism at the receptors, but research is revealing additional pathways of activity. For example, it is becoming apparent that reduction of nausea may be a key therapeutic target for ghrelin receptor agonists and perhaps for compounds that modulate the constitutive activity of the ghrelin receptor. Reduction of nausea may be the mechanism through which gastroparesis symptoms are reduced. Intriguingly, a potential ability of motilin to influence nausea is also becoming apparent. Ghrelin interacts with digestive function through its effects on appetite, and ghrelin antagonists may have a place in treating Prader-Willi syndrome. Unlike motilin, ghrelin receptor agonists also have the potential to treat constipation by acting at the lumbosacral defecation centres. In conclusion, agonists of both ghrelin and motilin receptors hold potential as treatments for specific subsets of digestive system disorders.

Future Treatment of Constipation-associated Disorders: Role of Relamorelin and Other Ghrelin Receptor Agonists

There is an unmet need for effective pharmacological therapies for constipation, a symptom that significantly deteriorates patients’ quality of life and impacts health care. Ghrelin is an endogenous ligand for the growth hormone secretagogue receptor and has been shown to exert prokinetic effects on gastrointestinal (GI) motility via the vagus and pelvic nerves. The pharmacological potential of ghrelin is hampered by its short half-life. Ghrelin receptor (GRLN-R) agonists with enhanced pharmacokinetics were thus developed. Centrally penetrant GRLN-R agonists stimulate defecation and improve impaired lower GI transit in animals and humans. This review summarizes the current knowledge on relamorelin, a potent ghrelin mimetic, and other GRLN-R analogs which are in preclinical or clinical stages of development for the management of disorders with underlying GI hypomotility, like constipation.

From Belly to Brain: Targeting the Ghrelin Receptor in Appetite and Food Intake Regulation

Ghrelin is the only known peripherally-derived orexigenic hormone, increasing appetite and subsequent food intake. The ghrelinergic system has therefore received considerable attention as a therapeutic target to reduce appetite in obesity as well as to stimulate food intake in conditions of anorexia, malnutrition and cachexia. As the therapeutic potential of targeting this hormone becomes clearer, it is apparent that its pleiotropic actions span both the central nervous system and peripheral organs. Despite a wealth of research, a therapeutic compound specifically targeting the ghrelin system for appetite modulation remains elusive although some promising effects on metabolic function are emerging. This is due to many factors, ranging from the complexity of the ghrelin receptor (Growth Hormone Secretagogue Receptor, GHSR-1a) internalisation and heterodimerization, to biased ligand interactions and compensatory neuroendocrine outputs. Not least is the ubiquitous expression of the GHSR-1a, which makes it impossible to modulate centrally-mediated appetite regulation without encroaching on the various peripheral functions attributable to ghrelin. It is becoming clear that ghrelin’s central signalling is critical for its effects on appetite, body weight regulation and incentive salience of food. Improving the ability of ghrelin ligands to penetrate the blood brain barrier would enhance central delivery to GHSR-1a expressing brain regions, particularly within the mesolimbic reward circuitry.

Ghrelin and motilin receptors as drug targets for gastrointestinal disorders

The gastrointestinal tract is the major source of the related hormones ghrelin and motilin, which act on structurally similar G protein-coupled receptors. Nevertheless, selective receptor agonists are available. The primary roles of endogenous ghrelin and motilin in the digestive system are to increase appetite or hedonic eating (ghrelin) and initiate phase III of gastric migrating myoelectric complexes (motilin). Ghrelin and motilin also both inhibit nausea. In clinical trials, the motilin receptor agonist camicinal increased gastric emptying, but at lower doses reduced gastroparesis symptoms and improved appetite. Ghrelin receptor agonists have been trialled for the treatment of diabetic gastroparesis because of their ability to increase gastric emptying, but with mixed results; however, relamorelin, a ghrelin agonist, reduced nausea and vomiting in patients with this disorder. Treatment of postoperative ileus with a ghrelin receptor agonist proved unsuccessful. Centrally penetrant ghrelin receptor agonists stimulate defecation in animals and humans, although ghrelin itself does not seem to control colorectal function. Thus, the most promising uses of motilin receptor agonists are the treatment of gastroparesis or conditions with slow gastric emptying, and ghrelin receptor agonists hold potential for the reduction of nausea and vomiting, and the treatment of constipation. Therapeutic, gastrointestinal roles for receptor antagonists or inverse agonists have not been identified.

Site and mechanism of the colokinetic action of the ghrelin receptor agonist, HM01

BACKGROUND

It has been recently demonstrated that the ghrelin receptor agonist, HM01, caused defecation in rats that were treated to provide a model for the constipation of Parkinson's disease. HM01 significantly increased fecal output and increased Fos activity in neurons of the hypothalamus and hindbrain, but not in the spinal defecation center. Other ghrelin agonists act on the defecation center.

METHODS

Receptor pharmacology was examined in ghrelin receptor (GHSR1a) transfected cells. Anesthetized rats were used to investigate sites and mechanisms of action.

KEY RESULTS

HM01 activated rat GHSR1a at nanomolar concentrations and was antagonized by the GHSR1a antagonist, YIL781. HM01, intravenous, was potent to activate propulsive colorectal contractions. This was prevented by pelvic nerve section and by intravenous YIL781, but not by spinal cord section rostral to the defecation centers. Direct intrathecal application of HM01 to the defecation center at spinal level L6-S1 initiated propulsive contractions of the colorectum.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

HM01 stimulates GHSR1a receptors on neurons in the lumbosacral defecation centers to cause propulsive contractions and emptying of the colorectum. It has greater potency when given systemically, compared with other GHSR1a agonists.

A ghrelin receptor agonist is an effective colokinetic in rats with diet-induced constipation

BACKGROUND

Despite constipation being a common problem, the treatments that are available have side effects and are only partly effective. Recent studies show that centrally penetrant ghrelin receptor agonists cause defecation in humans and other species. Here, we describe some features of a rat model of low fiber-induced constipation, and investigate the effectiveness of the ghrelin agonist, capromorelin.

METHODS

Rats were given low-fiber diets for 5 weeks. Their colorectal responsiveness to distension and to a behavioral test, water avoidance and colon histology were compared to those of rats on a standard diet.

KEY RESULTS

After the low-fiber diet, distension of the colon produced fewer propulsive contractions, behaviorally induced defecation was reduced, and the lining of the colorectum was inflamed. However, capromorelin was similarly effective in causing defecation in constipated and non-constipated rats.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Low-fiber diet in rats produces a constipation phenotype, characterized by reduced responsiveness of the colorectum to distension and to a behavioral stimulus of defecation, water avoidance. The effectiveness of capromorelin suggests that centrally penetrant ghrelin receptor stimulants may be effective in treating constipation.

Integrated Approach to Early Detection of Cardiovascular Toxicity Induced by a Ghrelin Receptor Agonist

Cardiovascular (CV) safety concerns are among the leading causes of compound attrition in drug development. This work describes a strategy of applying novel end points to a 7-day rodent study to increase the opportunity to detect and characterize CV injury observed in a longer term (ie, 28 days) study. Using a ghrelin receptor agonist (GSK894281), a compound that produces myocardial degeneration/necrosis in rats after 28 days at doses of 0.3, 1, 10, or 60 mg/kg/d, we dosed rats across a range of similar doses (0, 0.3, 60, or 150 mg/kg/d) for 7 days to determine whether CV toxicity could be detected in a shorter study. End points included light and electron microscopies of the heart; heart weight; serum concentrations of fatty acid-binding protein 3 (FABP3), cardiac troponin I (cTnI), cardiac troponin T (cTnT), and N-terminal proatrial natriuretic peptide (NT-proANP); and a targeted transcriptional assessment of heart tissue. Histologic evaluation revealed a minimal increase in the incidence and/or severity of cardiac necrosis in animals administered 150 mg/kg/d. Ultrastructurally, mitochondrial membrane whorls and mitochondrial degeneration were observed in rats given 60 or 150 mg/kg/d. The FABP3 was elevated in rats given 150 mg/kg/d. Cardiac transcriptomics revealed evidence of mitochondrial dysfunction coincident with histologic lesions in the heart, and along with the ultrastructural results support a mechanism of mitochondrial injury. There were no changes in cTnI, cTnT, NT-proANP, or heart weight. In summary, enhancing a study design with novel end points provides a more integrated evaluation in short-term repeat dose studies, potentially leading to earlier nonclinical detection of structural CV toxicity.

New ghrelin agonist, HM01 alleviates constipation and L-dopa-delayed gastric emptying in 6-hydroxydopamine rat model of Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

Constipation and L-dopa-induced gastric dysmotility are common gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD). We investigated the novel ghrelin agonist, HM01 influence on GI motor dysfunctions in 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) rats.

METHODS

HM01 pharmacological profiles were determined in vitro and in vivo in rats. We assessed changes in fecal output and water content, and gastric emptying (GE) in 6-OHDA rats treated with orogastric (og) HM01 and L-dopa/carbidopa (LD/CD, 20/2 mg/kg). Fos immunoreactivity (ir) cells in specific brain and lumbosacral spinal cord were quantified.

KEY RESULTS

HM01 displayed a high binding affinity to ghrelin receptor (Ki: 1.42 ± 0.36 nM), 4.3 ± 1.0 h half-life and high brain/plasma ratio. 6-OHDA rats had reduced daily fecal output (22%) and water intake (23%) compared to controls. HM01 (3 and 10 mg/kg) similarly reversed the decreased 4-h fecal weight and water content in 6-OHDA rats. Basal GE was not modified in 6-OHDA rats, however, LD/CD (once or daily for 8 days) delayed GE in 6-OHDA and control rats that was prevented by HM01 (3 mg/kg acute or daily before LD/CD). HM01 increased Fos-ir cell number in the area postrema, arcuate nucleus, nucleus tractus solitarius, and lumbosacral intermediolateral column of 6-OHDA rats where 6-OHDA had a lowering effect compared to controls.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

6-OHDA rats display constipation- and adipsia-like features of PD and L-dopa-inhibited GE. The new orally active ghrelin agonist, HM01 crosses the blood-brain barrier and alleviates these alterations suggesting a potential benefit for PD with GI disorders.

Preclinical gastrointestinal prokinetic efficacy and endocrine effects of the ghrelin mimetic RM-131

AIMS

The 28 amino acid hormone ghrelin, the natural ligand for the growth hormone secretagogue, or ghrelin receptor (GHR), has diverse physiological functions, including a possible role as a gastrointestinal prokinetic. The synthetic ghrelin mimetic RM-131 is in Phase II clinical trials for treatment of diabetic gastroparesis and other gastrointestinal (GI) disorders. We aimed to determine the relative potency of RM-131, when compared to other GI ghrelin mimetics, to predict efficacy and determine the role of RM-131 in models of inflammatory bowel disease.

MAIN METHODS

We evaluated and compared ghrelin, RM-131 and other synthetic ghrelin mimetics for their prokinetic potency in models of gastrointestinal disorders in the rat and we evaluated the endocrine (rats and dogs) and anti-inflammatory effects (mice) of the ghrelin mimetic RM-131.

KEY FINDINGS

The pentapeptide RM-131 increased gastric emptying in rodent models of ileus. RM-131 is about 100-fold more potent than human ghrelin and is 600 to 1800-fold more potent, when compared to several investigational ghrelin mimetics tested in clinical trials. RM-131 has anti-inflammatory effects and significantly increases survival and reduces macroscopic markers of tissue damage in a TNBS model of inflammatory bowel disease. RM-131 treatment shows a transient increase in growth hormone levels in Beagle dogs and rats, returning to baseline upon chronic treatment. Significant effects on glucose and insulin are not observed in chronic studies.

SIGNIFICANCE

RM-131's potency, efficacy and endocrine profile, are promising attributes for the treatment of diverse functional gastrointestinal disorders in humans.

The mechanism of enhanced defecation caused by the ghrelin receptor agonist, ulimorelin

BACKGROUND

Discovery of adequate pharmacological treatments for constipation has proven elusive. Increased numbers of bowel movements were reported as a side-effect of ulimorelin treatment of gastroparesis, but there has been no investigation of the site of action.

METHODS

Anesthetized rats were used to investigate sites and mechanisms of action of ulimorelin.

KEY RESULTS

Intravenous ulimorelin (1-5 mg/kg) caused a substantial and prolonged (~1 h) increase in colorectal propulsive activity and expulsion of colonic contents. This was prevented by cutting the nerves emerging from the lumbosacral cord, by the nicotinic receptor antagonist hexamethonium and by antagonists of the ghrelin receptor. The effect of intravenous ulimorelin was mimicked by direct application of ulimorelin (5 μg) to the lumbosacral spinal cord.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Ulimorelin is a potent prokinetic that causes propulsive contractions of the colorectum by activating ghrelin receptors of the lumbosacral defecation centers. Its effects are long-lasting, in contrast with other colokinetics that target ghrelin receptors.

Ghrelin signaling in the gut, its physiological properties, and therapeutic potential

BACKGROUND

Ghrelin, an orexigenic hormone secreted from the stomach, was soon after its discovery hypothesized to be a prokinetic agent, due to its homology to motilin. Studies in animals and humans, using ghrelin and ghrelin receptor agonists, confirmed this hypothesis, suggesting a therapeutic potential for the ghrelin receptor in the treatment of gastrointestinal motility disorders. Precilinical studies demonstrated that ghrelin can act directly on ghrelin receptors on the enteric nervous system, but the predominant route of action under physiological circumstances is signaling via the vagus nerve in the upper gastrointestinal tract and the pelvic nerves in the colon. Different pharmaceutical companies have designed stable ghrelin mimetics that revealed promising results in trials for the treatment of diabetic gastroparesis and post-operative ileus. Nevertheless, no drug was able to reach the market so far, facing problems proving superiority over placebo treatment in larger trials.

PURPOSE

This review aims to summarize the road that led to the current knowledge concerning the prokinetic properties of ghrelin with a focus on the therapeutic potential of ghrelin receptor agonists in the treatment of hypomotility disorders. In addition, we outline some of the problems that could be at the basis of the negative outcome of the trials with ghrelin agonists and question whether the right target groups were selected. It is clear that a new approach is needed to develop marketable drugs with this class of gastroprokinetic agents.

Intravenous ghrelin accelerates postoperative gastric emptying and time to first bowel movement in humans

BACKGROUND

Ghrelin has been shown to stimulate gastric emptying in healthy humans and patients with delayed gastric emptying. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of ghrelin on gastric emptying on day 2 after open colorectal surgery.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients (mean age 69.2 ± 1.4, BMI 25.8 ± 0.8 kg m(-2) ) were randomized to saline or ghrelin infusion (15 pmol kg(-1)  min(-1) ) during 3 h before and on day 2 after open colorectal surgery. Of these, 20 were assessed both before and after surgery. At start of infusion, a liquid meal (480 kcal, 200 mL) was administered together with 1.5 g acetaminophen. Plasma was obtained at regular intervals together with visual analogue scales for hunger, satiety and nausea. Acetaminophen was analyzed as a marker of gastric emptying. Plasma glucose, insulin, acyl-ghrelin, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), glucose-dependent insulinoptrophic peptide (GIP), pancreatic polypeptide and peptide YY (PYY) were analyzed.

KEY RESULTS

Gastric emptying was faster during ghrelin infusion compared to saline before and after surgery (P < 0.02). In addition, plasma glucose was increased (P < 0.05). With ghrelin infusion, plasma insulin was unchanged except for lower values postoperatively (P < 0.05). Ghrelin did not alter plasma concentrations of gut peptides. After surgery, ghrelin shortened the time to first bowel movement compared to saline (2.1 ± 0.3 vs 3.5 ± 0.4 days, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

A 3-h ghrelin infusion increased the gastric emptying rate and hastened the time to first bowel movement after surgery. Ghrelin/ghrelin receptor agonists have a therapeutic potential in postoperative ileus; Karolinska Clinical Trial Registry nr CT20110084.

Changes in carnitine octanoyltransferase activity induce alteration in fatty acid metabolism

The peroxisomal beta oxidation of very long chain fatty acids (VLCFA) leads to the formation of medium chain acyl-CoAs such as octanoyl-CoA. Today, it seems clear that the exit of shortened fatty acids produced by the peroxisomal beta oxidation requires their conversion into acyl-carnitine and the presence of the carnitine octanoyltransferase (CROT). Here, we describe the consequences of an overexpression and a knock down of the CROT gene in terms of mitochondrial and peroxisomal fatty acids metabolism in a model of hepatic cells. Our experiments showed that an increase in CROT activity induced a decrease in MCFA and VLCFA levels in the cell. These changes are accompanied by an increase in the level of mRNA encoding enzymes of the peroxisomal beta oxidation. In the same time, we did not observe any change in mitochondrial function. Conversely, a decrease in CROT activity had the opposite effect. These results suggest that CROT activity, by controlling the peroxisomal amount of medium chain acyls, may control the peroxisomal oxidative pathway.

Assay of ghrelin concentration in infant formulas and breast milk

AIM: To test if total ghrelin is present in infant formulas.

METHODS: Using a radioimmunoassay, we measured total ghrelin concentrations in 19 samples of commercial infant formulas and in 20 samples of human milk. We also determined ghrelin concentration in the serum of infants and lactating mothers.

RESULTS: Ghrelin concentrations were significantly higher in artificial milk (2007.1 ± 1725.36 pg/mL) than in human milk (828.17 ± 323.32 pg/mL) (P = 0.005). The mean ghrelin concentration in infant serum (n = 56) was 1115.86 ± 42.89 pg/mL, and was significantly higher (P = 0.023) in formula-fed infants (1247.93 ± 328.07 pg/mL) than in breast-fed infants (1045.7 ± 263.38 pg/mL). The mean serum ghrelin concentration (mean ± SD) in lactating mothers (n = 20) was 1319.18 ± 140.18 pg/mL.

CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that total ghrelin is present in infant formulas. This finding raises diverse questions regarding the uptake, absorption and metabolic effects of this hormone.

Contrasting effects of ghrelin and des-acyl ghrelin on the lumbo-sacral defecation center and regulation of colorectal motility in rats

BACKGROUND

We have previously demonstrated that a centrally penetrant ghrelin receptor agonist enhances colorectal motility, through activation of the lumbo-sacral defecation center (L6-S1 region of the spinal cord) in rats. In the present study, we examined the effects of the native peptide and its non-acylated counterpart in eliciting this stimulatory effect on colorectal motility.

METHODS

Rats were anesthetised with α-chloralose and ketamine, and colorectal intraluminal pressure and propelled intraluminal liquid volume were recorded in vivo.

KEY RESULTS

Intrathecal application of acylated ghrelin to the L6-S1 region of the spinal cord, but not intravenous application, elicited groups of phasic increases in colorectal intraluminal pressure that were associated with increased fluid output through the anal cannula. The effect was dose-dependent. The colokinetic effects of ghrelin were prevented if the pelvic nerves were severed. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction revealed the expression of the ghrelin and ghrelin receptor genes in the lumbo-sacral spinal cord. In contrast to acylated ghrelin, des-acyl ghrelin failed to cause changes in colorectal motility. However, when des-acyl ghrelin and ghrelin were applied simultaneously at the L6-S1 region, the ghrelin-induced enhancement of colorectal motility was significantly attenuated.

CONCLUSION & INFERENCES

It is concluded that acylation of the ghrelin peptide is essential to promote propulsive contractions of the colorectum and that des-acyl ghrelin opposes this effect. At most other sites of ghrelin action, des-acyl ghrelin either has no effect or it mimics ghrelin. This is the first evidence that non-acylated ghrelin opposes the action of the acylated peptide in the spinal cord.

A novel simultaneous measurement method to assess the influence of intracerebroventricular obestatin on colonic motility and secretion in conscious rats

Obestatin, a novel putative 23-amino acid peptide, is derived from mammalian preproghrelin gene via a bioinformatics approach. Although obestatin regulates thirst, sleep, memory, anxiety, activates cortical neurons in the brain and stimulate proliferation of retinal pigment epithelial cells, there is no study to explore its central impacts on the lower gut motility and secretion. We investigated the influence of intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of obestatin on rat colonic motor and secretory functions. Colonic transit time, fecal pellet output and fecal content were assessed in freely fed, conscious rats, which were implanted with ICV and colonic catheters chronically. Human/rat corticotropin-releasing factor (h/rCRF) was applied as a stimulatory inducer of colonic motility and secretion. ICV injection of obestatin (0.1, 0.3, 1.0 nmol/rat) did not modify the colonic transit time, whereas ICV injection of h/rCRF (0.3 nmol/rat) significantly shortened colonic transit time. ICV obestatin in any dose we tested did not affect the fecal pellet output, frequency of watery diarrhea, total fecal weight, fecal dried solid weight, or fecal fluid weight in the first hour post-injection, either. In contrast, ICV injection of h/rCRF effectively stimulated fecal pellet output, as well as increased total fecal weight, fecal dried solid weight and fecal fluid weight during the first hour post-injection, compared to ICV saline controls. In conclusion, using our novel simultaneous measurement method, acutely central administration of obestatin exhibits no influence on colonic motility and secretion in conscious rats.

Diabetes mellitus, inflammation, obesity: proposed treatment pathways for current and future therapies

OBJECTIVE

To review the pathophysiology, pharmacology, and current or future therapies under study for use in treating diabetes mellitus, inflammation associated with diabetes mellitus, and/or obesity related to diabetes mellitus, through 1 of 4 investigational pathways: adiponectin, ghrelin, resveratrol, or leptin.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search using MEDLINE (1966-December 12, 2009), PubMed (1950-December 12, 2009), Science Direct (1994-December 12, 2009), and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-December 12, 2009) was performed using the terms adiponectin, ghrelin, resveratrol, leptin, inflammation, obesity, and diabetes mellitus. English-language, original research, and review articles were examined, and citations from these articles were assessed as well.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Clinical studies and in vitro studies were included in addition to any Phase 1, 2, or 3 clinical trials.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Mechanistic pathways regarding adiponectin, ghrelin, resveratrol, and leptin are of interest as future treatment options for diabetes mellitus. Each of these pathways has produced significant in vitro and in vivo clinical data warranting further research as a possible treatment pathway for diabetes-related inflammation and/or obesity reduction. While research is still underway to determine the exact effects these pathways have on metabolic function, current data suggest that each of these compounds may be of interest for future therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

While several pathways under investigation may offer additional benefits in the treatment of diabetes mellitus and associated impairments, further investigation is necessary for both investigational and approved therapies to ensure that the impact in new pathways does not increase risks to patient safety and outcomes.

Ghrelin gene products and the regulation of food intake and gut motility

A breakthrough using "reverse pharmacology" identified and characterized acyl ghrelin from the stomach as the endogenous cognate ligand for the growth hormone (GH) secretagogue receptor (GHS-R) 1a. The unique post-translational modification of O-n-octanoylation at serine 3 is the first in peptide discovery history and is essential for GH-releasing ability. Des-acyl ghrelin, lacking O-n-octanoylation at serine 3, is also produced in the stomach and remains the major molecular form secreted into the circulation. The third ghrelin gene product, obestatin, a novel 23-amino acid peptide identified from rat stomach, was found by comparative genomic analysis. Three ghrelin gene products actively participate in modulating appetite, adipogenesis, gut motility, glucose metabolism, cell proliferation, immune, sleep, memory, anxiety, cognition, and stress. Knockdown or knockout of acyl ghrelin and/or GHS-R1a, and overexpression of des-acyl ghrelin show benefits in the therapy of obesity and metabolic syndrome. By contrast, agonism of acyl ghrelin and/or GHS-R1a could combat human anorexia-cachexia, including anorexia nervosa, chronic heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, liver cirrhosis, chronic kidney disease, burn, and postsurgery recovery, as well as restore gut dysmotility, such as diabetic or neurogenic gastroparesis, and postoperative ileus. The ghrelin acyl-modifying enzyme, ghrelin O-Acyltransferase (GOAT), which attaches octanoate to serine-3 of ghrelin, has been identified and characterized also from the stomach. To date, ghrelin is the only protein to be octanylated, and inhibition of GOAT may have effects only on the stomach and is unlikely to affect the synthesis of other proteins. GOAT may provide a critical molecular target in developing novel therapeutics for obesity and type 2 diabetes.

The prokinetic face of ghrelin

This review evaluated published data regarding the effects of ghrelin on GI motility using the PubMed database for English articles from 1999 to September 2009. Our strategy was to combine all available information from previous literature, in order to provide a complete structured review on the prokinetic properties of exogenous ghrelin and its potential use for treatment of various GI dysmotility ailments. We classified the literature into two major groups, depending on whether studies were done in health or in disease. We sub-classified the studies into stomach, small intestinal and colon studies, and broke them down further into studies done in vitro, in vivo (animals) and in humans. Further more, the reviewed studies were presented in a chronological order to guide the readers across the scientific advances in the field. The review shows evidences that ghrelin and its (receptor) agonists possess a strong prokinetic potential to serve in the treatment of diabetic, neurogenic or idiopathic gastroparesis and possibly, chemotherapy-associated dyspepsia, postoperative, septic or post-burn ileus, opiate-induced bowel dysfunction and chronic idiopathic constipation. Further research is necessary to close the gap in knowledge about the effect of ghrelin on the human intestines in health and disease.

Efficacy of ipamorelin, a novel ghrelin mimetic, in a rodent model of postoperative ileus

Ghrelin and ghrelin mimetics stimulate appetite and enhance gastric motility. The present study investigates whether ipamorelin, a selective growth hormone secretagogue and agonist of the ghrelin receptor, would accelerate gastrointestinal transit and ameliorate the symptoms in a rodent model of postoperative ileus (POI). Fasted male rats were subjected to laparotomy and intestinal manipulation. At the end of surgery, a dye marker was infused in the proximal colon to evaluate postsurgical colonic transit time, which was the time to the first bowel movement. In addition, fecal pellet output, food intake, and body weight were monitored regularly for 48 h. Ipamorelin (0.01-1 mg/kg), growth hormone-releasing peptide (GHRP)-6 (20 microg/kg), or vehicle (saline) were administered via intravenous bolus infusion after a single dosing or a 2-day repetitive dosing regimen (four doses a day at 3-h intervals). Compared with the vehicle, a single dose of ipamorelin (1 mg/kg) or GHRP-6 (20 microg/kg) decreased the time to the first bowel movement but had no effect on cumulative fecal output, food intake, or body weight gain measured 48 h after the surgery. In contrast, repetitive dosing of ipamorelin (0.1 or 1 mg/kg) significantly increased the cumulative fecal pellet output, food intake, and body weight gain. The results suggest that postsurgical intravenous infusions of ipamorelin may ameliorate the symptoms in patients with POI.

Faces of ghrelin--research for the 21st century

In this issue of Neurogastroenterology and Motility we find three new articles on different aspects of ghrelin, dealing with physiological and pathophysiological actions of the peptide. For the reader this is food for thoughts: Does this peptide do everything? Ghrelin is a gut peptide hormone well established to stimulate motility throughout most parts of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and appetite. Ghrelin has been linked to various GI regulatory mechanisms, the most evident being hunger, over-eating and obesity. In this setting ghrelin has been studied under physiological conditions converging on obesity as a pathophysiological process where the peptide has been employed as an interesting tool for studying the development of obesity. With a widespread distribution of ghrelin receptors on various immune cells, it has been assumed that ghrelin also possesses immunoregulatory properties, thus also being of interest in intestinal inflammation research. Anti-inflammatory effects of exogenous ghrelin have been claimed in experimental colitis in mice. Further studies on this concept using ghrelin gene knock-out mice, however, show an increased inflammatory activity in experimental colitis in wild-type mice pointing to ghrelin as an enhancer of the inflammatory course of the disease. Taken together, recent studies on ghrelin indicate that the peptide is not only a regulatory agent in pathophysiological processes, but also participates in pathological disease conditions with actions that seem to even involve genetic mechanisms.