Efficacy and safety relative to placebo of an oral formulation of cetirizine and sustained-release pseudoephedrine in the management of nasal congestion

A Synopsis of Guidance for Allergic Rhinitis Diagnosis and Management From ICAR 2023

An updated edition of the International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR:AR) has recently been published. This consensus document, which included the participation of 87 primary authors and 40 additional consultant authors, who critically appraised evidence on 144 individual topics concerning allergic rhinitis, provides guidance for health care providers using the evidence-based review with recommendations (EBRR) methodology. This synopsis highlights topical areas including pathophysiology, epidemiology, disease burden, risk and protective factors, evaluation and diagnosis, aeroallergen avoidance and environmental controls, single and combination pharmacotherapy options, allergen immunotherapy (subcutaneous, sublingual, rush, cluster), pediatric considerations, alternative and emerging therapies, and unmet needs. Based on the EBRR methodology, ICAR:AR includes strong recommendations for the treatment of allergic rhinitis: (1) for the use of newer generation antihistamines compared with first-generation alternatives, intranasal corticosteroid, intranasal saline, combination therapy with intranasal corticosteroid plus intranasal antihistamine for patients not responding to monotherapy, and subcutaneous immunotherapy and sublingual tablet immunotherapy in properly selected patients; (2) against the use of oral decongestant monotherapy and routine use of oral corticosteroids.

International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Critical examination of the quality and validity of available allergic rhinitis (AR) literature is necessary to improve understanding and to appropriately translate this knowledge to clinical care of the AR patient. To evaluate the existing AR literature, international multidisciplinary experts with an interest in AR have produced the International Consensus statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR:AR).

METHODS

Using previously described methodology, specific topics were developed relating to AR. Each topic was assigned a literature review, evidence-based review (EBR), or evidence-based review with recommendations (EBRR) format as dictated by available evidence and purpose within the ICAR:AR document. Following iterative reviews of each topic, the ICAR:AR document was synthesized and reviewed by all authors for consensus.

RESULTS

The ICAR:AR document addresses over 100 individual topics related to AR, including diagnosis, pathophysiology, epidemiology, disease burden, risk factors for the development of AR, allergy testing modalities, treatment, and other conditions/comorbidities associated with AR.

CONCLUSION

This critical review of the AR literature has identified several strengths; providers can be confident that treatment decisions are supported by rigorous studies. However, there are also substantial gaps in the AR literature. These knowledge gaps should be viewed as opportunities for improvement, as often the things that we teach and the medicine that we practice are not based on the best quality evidence. This document aims to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of the AR literature to identify areas for future AR research and improved understanding.

Evaluation of clinical outcomes of implants placed into the maxillary sinus with a perforated sinus membrane: a retrospective study

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of implants that were placed within the maxillary sinus that has a perforated sinus membrane by the lateral window approach.

Methods

We examined the medical records of the patients who had implants placed within the maxillary sinus that has a perforated sinus membrane by the lateral approach at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of Chonnam National University Dental Hospital from January 2009 to December 2015. There were 41 patients (male:female = 28:13). The mean age of patients was 57.2 ± 7.2 years at the time of operation (range, 20–76 years). The mean follow-up duration was 2.1 years (range, 0.5–5 years) after implant placement. Regarding the method of sinus elevation, only the lateral approach was included in this study.

Results

Ninety-nine implants were placed in 41 patients whose sinus membranes were perforated during lateral approach. The perforated sinus membranes were repaired with a resorbable collagen membrane. Simultaneous implant placements with sinus bone grafting were performed in 37 patients, whereas delayed placements were done in four patients. The average residual bone height was 3.4 ± 2.0 mm in cases of simultaneous implant placement and 0.6 ± 0.9 mm in cases of delayed placement. Maxillary bone graft with implant placement, performed on the patients with a perforated maxillary sinus membrane did not fail, and the cumulative implant survival rate was 100%.

Conclusions

In patients with perforations of the sinus mucosa, sinus elevation and implant placement are possible regardless of the location and size of membrane perforation. Repair using resorbable collagen membrane is a predictable and reliable technique.

Radioactive Merano SPA Treatment for Allergic Rhinitis Therapy

Allergic rhinitis is a common nasal disorder with a high impact on quality of life, high social costs in therapies, and a natural development towards asthma. Pharmacological therapy is based on several genres of medications, of which intranasal corticosteroids are currently the most widespread. Thermal water treatment has traditionally been used as adjunctive treatment for chronic rhinitis and sinusitis. The present study was carried out to assess the clinical efficacy of nasal inhalation of radioactive oligomineral water vapours from the Merano hot spring and to compare it with the clinical efficacy of mometasone furoate nasal spray. A comparative prospective study was performed in 90 allergic patients treated at Merano hot springs: a group of 54 subjects treated with radioactive thermal oligomineral water and a control group of 36 subjects treated with mometasone nasal spray. Patients of both groups were assessed before and after treatment by Sino-Nasal Outcome Test questionnaire, active anterior rhinomanometry with flow and resistance monitoring, measurement of mucociliary transport time, and cytological examination of nasal brushing/scraping. The study showed that inhalation treatment with radioactive hydrofluoric thermal water for two weeks produces an objective clinical and cytological improvement in allergic patients, similar to that obtained with mometasone furoate nasal spray.

Using magnetic resonance imaging to quantify the inflammatory response following allergen challenge in allergic rhinitis

Current rhinometric and flow assessments measure nasal patency and are often poorly correlated with rhinitis symptoms. To evaluate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a new method to measure inflammatory changes in nasal and sinus mucosa following nasal allergen challenge. A pilot study (n = 6) determined the optimal technical settings for MRI to measure inflammatory change which were then adopted for the main study. This study was a single blind, placebo‐controlled, three‐way crossover trial in 14 subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Effects of cetirizine, cetirizine and pseudoephedrine (Cet+PE), or placebo on total nasal symptom scores (TNSS), peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF), nasal nitric oxide (nNO), acoustic rhinometry, and MRI end points following nasal intranasal allergen challenge were measured. There were significant changes in all parameters after allergen challenge (P < 0.01), except for nNO. MRI end points were less variable and more consistent than PNIF and acoustic rhinometry in detecting changes after allergen challenge. Total nasal airspace volume was the most sensitive and reproducible MRI measurement, with a mean reduction from −5.37 cm³ (95%CI −7.35, −3.38; P < 0.001), which was maximal 60 min after allergen challenge. A change of one in TNSS corresponded to a change in MRI volume of −0.57 cm³. There was an improvement in all parameters (except nNO) in subjects taking Cet+PE compared with placebo, however this did not achieve significance probably because of the small study size (overall analysis P > 0.07; comparison of active versus placebo P > 0.09). MRI provides novel insights into the anatomical inflammatory changes post allergen challenge and provides a new method for assessment of nasal patency and objective measurement of inflammatory responses.

Antihistamine therapy in allergic rhinitis

Antihistamines have long been a mainstay in the therapy for allergic rhinitis. Many different oral antihistamines are available for use, and they are classified as first generation or second generation based on their pharmacologic properties and side-effect profiles. The recent introduction of intranasal antihistamines has further expanded the role of antihistamines in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Certain patient populations, such as children and pregnant or lactating women, require special consideration regarding antihistamine choice and dosing as part of rhinitis therapy.

Anti-allergic drug testing in an environmental challenge chamber is suitable both in and out of the relevant pollen season

BACKGROUND

An environmental challenge chamber (ECC) is a useful tool to expose allergic patients to relevant allergens in a controlled indoor setting and to test anti-allergic treatment. Hitherto, ECC studies with grass pollen are conducted primarily outside of the pollen season to avoid the influence of natural pollen exposure.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether an established anti-allergic treatment, a combination of cetirizine (CET) and pseudoephedrine (PSE), shows an equivalent treatment effect within and outside of the grass pollen season when tested in an ECC.

METHODS

In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, four-way crossover study, the effect of a combination of 10 mg CET and 120 mg PSE compared with placebo on nasal symptoms, nasal flow, and nasal secretion was investigated in 70 patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Subjects underwent four 6-hour pollen challenges in an ECC with administration of the drugs after 2 hours. Two challenges were conducted within the grass pollen season and two out of the grass pollen season.

RESULTS

The active treatment significantly improved nasal symptoms and nasal flow and significantly reduced the amount of nasal secretion compared with placebo both within and outside of the pollen season (P < .0001 each). The treatment effect was not different between the seasons (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Controlled allergen provocation in an ECC can be used to test anti-allergic treatment both within and outside of the grass pollen season.

Fluticasone furoate versus placebo in symptoms of grass-pollen allergic rhinitis induced by exposure in the Vienna Challenge Chamber

OBJECTIVE

The Vienna Challenge Chamber (VCC) offers a controlled and controllable paradigm in which to reproducibly evaluate the efficacy of anti-allergic treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of the novel intranasal corticosteroid fluticasone furoate (FF) in the VCC.

METHODS

The single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-period crossover study was conducted in 59 adult males with grass pollen allergic rhinitis (AR). Patients received either Fluticasone furoate 200 mcg once-daily, or placebo intranasally for 8 days. AR symptoms were induced during 4-hour allergen challenges with grass pollen in the VCC at the end of each 8-day treatment period. A first challenge was conducted at 1-5 hours post-dose, followed by a second challenge at 22-26 hours post-dose. The primary endpoint was total nasal symptom score (TNSS; sum of itch, sneeze, rhinorrhoea, obstruction symptoms assessed on a categorical scale of 0-3) weighted mean over 2-5 hours post-dose. Secondary endpoints included: TNSS weighted mean over 23-26 hours post-dose and global symptom score, eye symptom score, nasal secretions and nasal airflow weighted means over 2-5 and 23-26 hours post-dose.

RESULTS

Fluticasone furoate showed consistent attenuation of AR symptoms in both the early and late challenges. Compared with placebo, weighted mean of TNSS was reduced on average by 4.14 point-scores at 2-5 hours post-dose and 3.63 point scores at 23-26 hours post-dose. These positive effects were also seen across all secondary endpoints.

CONCLUSION

An 8-day treatment course of intranasal FF 200 mcg given once-daily statistically significantly reduced symptoms of AR including associated eye symptoms. Statistical significance was declared where the relevant two-sided 95% confidence interval did not contain zero. This positive effect was sustained over 24 hours suggesting that fluticasone furoate could be efficacious as a once daily steroid.

Clinical trial of 3 days of treatment with oral pseudoephedrine for the common cold in the southern hemisphere

BACKGROUND

Single-dose studies indicate that pseudoephedrine (PSE) provides moderate relief for congestion in coryza, but there is a lack of repeated-dose studies.

METHODS

Two hundred sixteen subjects participated in this double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial over 3 days. Measurements included posterior rhinomanometry, acoustic rhinometry, and subjective measures of congestion using a categorical scale and visual analog scale (VAS). Treatment was with one 60-mg PSE tablet four times daily or matching placebo.

RESULTS

After the first dose, PSE relative to placebo consistently showed small improvements for all objective assessments of nasal congestion. The prespecified primary efficacy outcome (day 1 nasal airway resistance area under the curve) was not significantly different between groups. PSE produced a 5.5% (p = 0.031) increase in total nasal volume for 0.5-3 hours after dosing. A pooled analysis of days 1 and 3 data showed a VAS score decrease of 7.0% (p = 0.072) for the 0.5- to 3-hour period on PSE.

CONCLUSION

PSE showed small but nonsignificant improvements in objective assessments of nasal congestion relative to placebo after a single dose.

Onset of action of fexofenadine hydrochloride 60 mg/pseudoephedrine hydrochloride 120 mg in subjects aged 12 years with moderate to severe seasonal allergic rhinitis: a pooled analysis of two single-dose, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled allergen exposure unit studies

BACKGROUND

The onset of action of antihistamine-decongestant combinations is an important factor in the treatment of subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR).

OBJECTIVE

This was a pooled analysis of 2 published studies with identical designs investigating the onset of action of the combination of fexofenadine hydrochloride 60 mg/pseudoephedrine hydrochloride 120 mg (FEX60/PSE120) in subjects with moderate to severe SAR.

METHODS

Subjects aged 12 years received single doses of FEX60/PSE120 or placebo in 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, allergen exposure unit studies and recorded their SAR symptoms on diary cards before dosing, at 15-minute intervals for 2 hours after dosing, and at 30-minute intervals for the next 4 hours. The primary efficacy end point was onset of action, assessed in terms of absolute change in the major symptom complex (MSC) score, which was the sum of scores for the individual symptoms of stuffy nose, itchy nose, runny nose, watery eyes, itchy eyes, itchy ears/throat, and sneezing. Secondary end points included the absolute and percent change in the total symptom complex (TSC) score (the sum of the MSC score plus the scores for nose blowing, sniffles, postnasal drip, and cough) and individual symptom scores. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were recorded. Analyses were performed on the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population, which included all subjects who were randomized to treatment and took the single dose of study medication according to the protocol.

RESULTS

A total of 1693 subjects were screened in the 2 studies, and 786 were randomized (298 in study 1, 488 in study 2). Two subjects withdrew from study 2; therefore, the mITT population consisted of 784 subjects. Subjects' mean age was 33.4 years, and 64.4% were female. The onset of action of FEX60/PSE120 was 45 minutes; the least squares mean (SD) treatment difference in the change from baseline in absolute MSC score was 0.8 (0.31) (95% CI, 0.2-1.4; P = 0.008). All subsequent changes from baseline in MSC scores were statistically significant for FEX60/PSE120 compared with placebo (P < 0.001). The absolute and percent change in TSC score and the percent change in MSC score were significantly decreased at all time points from 45 minutes after dosing for FEX60/PSE120 compared with placebo (all, P < 0.05). Individual symptoms (mean of hours 1 to 5) also were significantly improved with FEX60/PSE120 compared with placebo (all, P < 0.05). TEAEs were reported by 2.3% (9/391) and 4.3% (17/393) of subjects receiving FEX60/PSE120 and placebo, respectively. The most commonly occurring TEAS in the FEX60/PSE120 and placebo groups was somnolence (n = 4 and n = 6, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In this pooled analysis of 2 allergen exposure unit studies, FEX60/PSE120 had an onset of action of 45 minutes and a sustained effect throughout the 6-hour study period in subjects with moderate to severe SAR.

Once-daily immediate-release fexofenadine and sustained-release pseudoephedrine combination: a new treatment option for allergic rhinitis

Allergic rhinitis symptoms, in particular nasal congestion, can have a significant impact on patient quality of life, resulting in reduced productivity and daytime sleepiness. Newer-generation antihistamines are commonly used to treat allergic rhinitis; however, in patients with severe congestion, a combination of a newer-generation antihistamine and a decongestant is particularly beneficial. A new once-daily fexofenadine/pseudoephedrine combination has been developed and recently approved in the US. The combination provides an effective, well-tolerated antihistamine and a reliable, sustained-release pseudoephedrine system. In addition, small tablet size and once-daily dosing may provide patients with increased convenience and improve adherence. In summary, the combination of immediate-release fexofenadine/sustained-release pseudoephedrine offers an important additional option for the treatment of allergic rhinitis.

Experimental models for the evaluation of treatment of allergic rhinitis

OBJECTIVE

To review the experimental models used for the clinical evaluation of treatments for allergic rhinitis.

DATA SOURCES

Peer-reviewed clinical studies and review articles were selected from the PubMed database using the following relevant keywords: allergic rhinitis in combination with efficacy, wheal and flare, nasal challenge, park, cat room, or exposure unit. Regulatory guidance documents on allergic rhinitis were also included.

STUDY SELECTION

The authors' knowledge of the field was used to limit references with emphasis on recent randomized and controlled studies. References of historical significance were also included.

RESULTS

Traditional outpatient studies are universally accepted in the evaluation of treatment for allergic rhinitis. Experimental models provide ancillary information on efficacy at different stages of treatment development. Skin histamine and allergen challenge, as well as direct nasal challenge with histamine and allergen, are often used as early steps in assessing drug efficacy. Exposure units, park settings, and cat rooms better approximate real life by drawing on the natural mode of allergen exposure and delivering the sensitizing allergen to allergic individuals in the ambient air. Park studies make use of allergens in the outdoors, whereas cat rooms and exposure units present the sensitizing allergens indoors, with the latter providing consistent predetermined allergen levels. Exposure unit and park studies are acknowledged for the determination of onset of action and are also suited to the measurement of duration of effect and other measures of efficacy. Onset and duration of effect are 2 important pharmacodynamic properties of antihistamines and nasal corticosteroids as determined by the Allergic Rhinitis and Its Impact on Asthma and the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology workshop group.

CONCLUSIONS

All challenge models serve as important instruments in the evaluation of antiallergic medications and provide additional information to complement traditional studies.

Single-dose and steady-state bioequivalence of fexofenadine and pseudoephedrine combination tablets compared with individual formulations in healthy adults

OBJECTIVE

A 24-h extended-release formulation of fexofenadine HCl 180 mg/pseudoephedrine HCl 240 mg (FEX 180 mg/PSE 240 mg) has recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for symptom relief of seasonal allergic rhinitis, including nasal congestion. When considering a combination formulation, it is important to confirm that the metabolism and pharmacokinetics of the drugs remain unchanged when combined. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate single-dose and steady-state bioequivalence of FEX 180 mg/PSE 240 mg 24-h compared with the individual formulations taken concurrently.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was an open-label, randomized, two-treatment, two-period, 10-day, crossover study. In Treatment A, healthy subjects received a single, oral dose of FEX 180 mg/PSE 240 mg combination tablet on Day 1 followed by 6 days of once-daily dosing beginning on Day 4. Participants in Treatment B were concurrently administered a single oral dose of FEX 180 mg immediate-release tablet and a PSE 240 mg extended-release tablet with a similar dosing schedule. After an 8-day washout period, subjects crossed over to the alternate treatment. Plasma concentrations of FEX and PSE were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Pharmacokinetic parameters AUC0-infinity1 and Cmax1 following a single-dose (Day 1, dose 1), Cmax7, AUC0-24(7) at steady-state and Cmin7 measured at the end of the dosing interval (Day 9, dose 7) revealed bioequivalence between FEX 180 mg/PSE 240 mg combination tablet and the individual components taken concurrently. The 90% confidence intervals for the treatment ratios fell entirely within the bioequivalence range (80% to 125%). The combination tablet was well tolerated by all subjects, with a safety profile comparable to the individual components.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate that the pharmacokinetics of the new 24-h FEX 180 mg/PSE 240 mg combination formulation are bioequivalent to the concurrent administration of the individual drug components. Furthermore, both treatments were well tolerated in this population.

Second-Generation Antihistamines

Antihistamines are useful medications for the treatment of a variety of allergic disorders. Second-generation antihistamines avidly and selectively bind to peripheral histamine H1 receptors and, consequently, provide gratifying relief of histamine-mediated symptoms in a majority of atopic patients. This tight receptor specificity additionally leads to few effects on other neuronal or hormonal systems, with the result that adverse effects associated with these medications, with the exception of noticeable sedation in about 10% of cetirizine-treated patients, resemble those of placebo overall. Similarly, serious adverse drug reactions and interactions are uncommon with these medicines. Therapeutic interchange to one of the available second-generation antihistamines is a reasonable approach to limiting an institutional formulary, and adoption of such a policy has proven capable of creating substantial cost savings. Differences in overall efficacy and safety between available second-generation antihistamines, when administered in equivalent dosages, are not large. However, among the antihistamines presently available, fexofenadine may offer the best overall balance of effectiveness and safety, and this agent is an appropriate selection for initial or switch therapy for most patients with mild or moderate allergic symptoms. Cetirizine is the most potent antihistamine available and has been subjected to more clinical study than any other. This agent is appropriate for patients proven unresponsive to other antihistamines and for those with the most severe symptoms who might benefit from antihistamine treatment of the highest potency that can be dose-titrated up to maximal intensity.

A direct comparison of the efficacy of antihistamines in SAR and PAR: randomised, placebo-controlled studies with levocetirizine and loratadine using an environmental exposure unit - the Vienna Challenge Chamber (VCC)

OBJECTIVE

The Vienna Challenge Chamber (VCC) is an established method for the controlled exposure of patients to specific allergens, used to make valid comparisons between antihistamines. The aim of the significantly more than loratadine at all time two placebo-controlled, randomised studies reported here was to compare the efficacy and safety of levocetirizine 5 mg od and loratadine 10 mg od in subjects suffering from seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) or perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

During each study period, SAR and PAR subjects were exposed to grass pollen or house-dust mite allergens, respectively for 6 h on 2 consecutive days in the VCC. Each day, medications were administered 2 h after the start of the challenge; with a washout of at least 5 days between each period. The main criterion for evaluation of efficacy was the major symptom complex (MSC) for SAR and the complex symptom score (CSS) for PAR.

RESULTS

The pattern of patients' response was similar in SAR and PAR. Both levocetirizine and loratadine were superior to placebo in alleviating SAR and PAR symptoms at all time intervals evaluated during the two study days. Levocetirizine decreased the mean MSC score intervals in SAR subjects, with the most marked difference observed on day 2 (p = 0.002). In PAR patients, although with borderline significance (p = 0.08), levocetirizine decreased the mean CSS more than loratadine. Levocetirizine appeared to have a faster onset of action than loratadine in SAR (45 min versus 1 h 15 min) and PAR (1 h versus 1 h 30 min). However, these apparent differences were not tested for statistical significance. Both medications were well tolerated and no treatment-related adverse events were reported. This level of antihistamine efficacy was maintained regardless of whether the subjects' rhinitis was seasonal or perennial.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that levocetirizine is superior to loratadine in improving symptoms in SAR and that there is a similar trend in PAR.

Effect of desloratadine versus placebo on nasal airflow and subjective measures of nasal obstruction in subjects with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinitis in an allergen-exposure unit

BACKGROUND

Unlike many antihistamines, desloratadine can reduce nasal congestion in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR).

OBJECTIVE

We compared the effects of 5 mg of desloratadine and placebo on nasal airflow and SAR symptoms, including nasal congestion, in response to grass pollen in an allergen-exposure unit.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial, 47 subjects with histories of SAR received desloratadine or placebo every morning for 7 days and, after a 10-day washout period, were crossed over to the other treatment arm for 7 days. Subjects underwent a 6-hour allergen exposure on day 7 of each treatment period. Nasal airflow and nasal secretion weights were measured before and every 30 minutes during allergen exposure; SAR symptoms (including nasal congestion) were scored before exposure and every 15 minutes thereafter.

RESULTS

Nasal obstruction, as measured by nasal airflow, was less severe with desloratadine than with placebo (P <.02). Individual and combined SAR symptom severity scores, including nasal congestion and sneezing, were significantly lower with desloratadine than with placebo (all P < or =.003). Within 30 minutes of allergen exposure, less severely decreased nasal airflow (P <.02), less nasal secretions (P <.001), and less severe symptoms, including nasal congestion (P <.002), rhinorrhea, and sneezing, occurred with desloratadine compared with placebo, and this continued throughout (0-6 hours) allergen exposure. Desloratadine was well tolerated, with an adverse event profile similar to that of placebo.

CONCLUSION

In subjects with allergen-induced SAR symptoms, desloratadine significantly reduced the severity of nasal obstruction and accompanying complaints of nasal congestion and other SAR symptoms compared with the effects of placebo.

Cetirizine/pseudoephedrine

Cetirizine is the carboxylated metabolite of hydroxyzine, and has high specific affinity for histamine H(1) receptors. Pseudoephedrine is a sympathomimetic drug that acts directly on alpha-adrenergic receptors. black triangle Cetirizine/pseudoephedrine 5/120 mg twice daily was significantly more effective than intranasal budesonide 100 microg or placebo at improving nasal obstruction, nasal patency and reducing the volume of nasal secretion, and was significantly more effective than intranasal xylometazoline 0.1% with respect to nasal secretion, during house dust mite faeces challenge in three randomised, cross- over studies among volunteers with seasonal or perennial rhinitis. The onset of action of cetirizine/pseudoephedrine was reported to be approximately 30 minutes. black triangle The bioavailability of cetirizine and pseudoephedrine is similar after administration of cetirizine/pseudoephedrine 5/120 mg bilayer tablets or coadministration of cetirizine 5 mg tablets plus pseudoephedrine sustained-release (SR) 120 mg caplets. black triangle Cetirizine 5mg plus pseudoephedrine SR 120 mg twice daily for 2 to 3 weeks was significantly more effective than each drug given alone at reducing mean total symptom scores for seasonal or perennial allergic rhinitis in two randomised, double-blind, multicentre trials. In both studies, the mean proportion of days during which the five measured symptoms (nasal obstruction, sneezing, rhinorrhoea, nasal pruritus and ocular pruritus) were absent or mild was significantly greater in recipients of the cetirizine plus pseudoephedrine SR. black triangle In one study, cetirizine 5 mg plus pseudoephedrine SR 120 mg was significantly more effective at reducing nasal obstruction than either drug alone. black triangle Cetirizine 5mg plus pseudoephedrine SR 120 mg twice daily for 2 to 3 weeks was well tolerated in patients with seasonal or perennial allergic rhinitis. The most common adverse events were dry mouth, insomnia, headache, somnolence, asthenia and nervousness.