1
|
Mak HW, Yeung MH, Wong JC, Chiang V, Li PH. Differences in beta-lactam and penicillin allergy: Beyond the West and focusing on Asia-Pacific. FRONTIERS IN ALLERGY 2022; 3:1059321. [PMID: 36483185 PMCID: PMC9723361 DOI: 10.3389/falgy.2022.1059321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 04/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Beta-lactam (BL) antibiotic "allergy" labels are common, but often overdiagnosed. Although much research has been focused on the BL allergy and the delabelling process in the West, studies from other parts of the world remain sparse. This review outlines the contrasting global epidemiology, shifting clinical practices and disparities of BL allergy in the Asia-Pacific region compared with the West. Innovative strategies to overcome barriers in BL allergy workup are discussed and potential directions for future research and service development are also proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugo W.F. Mak
- Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Maegan H.Y. Yeung
- Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Jane C.Y. Wong
- Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Valerie Chiang
- Division of Clinical Immunology, Department of Pathology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Philip H. Li
- Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Van De Sijpe G, Gilissen L, Vandebotermet M, Peetermans WE, Spriet I, Schrijvers R. Non-invasive delabeling and refining of beta-lactam allergy labels in inpatients to optimize antimicrobial stewardship. Allergy 2022; 77:3157-3159. [PMID: 35876226 DOI: 10.1111/all.15453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Greet Van De Sijpe
- Pharmacy Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Liesbeth Gilissen
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Environment and Health, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Martijn Vandebotermet
- Department of General Internal Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Willy E Peetermans
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of General Internal Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Isabel Spriet
- Pharmacy Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rik Schrijvers
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of General Internal Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhou H, Liu L, Sun X, Wang H, Yu X, Su Y, You Z, An Z. The impact of pharmacist intervention on prophylactic antibiotics use in orthopedic surgery at a hospital in China. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e28458. [PMID: 34967386 PMCID: PMC8718203 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000028458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the impact of the pharmacist-led intervention on perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis by standardizing the cephalosporin intradermal skin test in the orthopedic department.A pre-and postintervention study was conducted among patients in the Orthopedics Department at the Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital in China. Use of intradermal skin test, perioperative antibacterial prophylaxis, and cost of care were compared between the preintervention population (admitted from 6/1/2018 to 8/31/2018) and postintervention population (admitted from 1/1/2019 to 3/31/2019). Logistic regression and generalized linear regression were used to assess the intervention impact.425 patients from the preintervention period and 448 patients from the postintervention period were included in the study. After the implementation of the pharmacist intervention program, there was a decrease in the utilization of intradermal skin tests, from 95.8% to 16.5% (P < .001). Patients were more likely to have cephalosporin as prophylactic antimicrobials (OR = 5.28, P < .001) after the implementation. The cost of antimicrobials was significantly reduced by $150.21 (P < .001) for each patient.Pharmacist-involved intervention can reduce the utilization of cephalosporins skin tests and decrease the prescription of unnecessary high-cost antimicrobials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Zhou
- Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Lihong Liu
- Department of Pharmacy, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao Sun
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Tulane University, LA
| | - Huaguang Wang
- Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaojia Yu
- Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Ye Su
- Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhaoyuan You
- Nursing Department, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhuoling An
- Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
|
5
|
Minaldi E, Phillips EJ, Norton A. Immediate and Delayed Hypersensitivity Reactions to Beta-Lactam Antibiotics. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2021; 62:449-462. [PMID: 34767158 DOI: 10.1007/s12016-021-08903-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Beta-lactam antibiotics are the most commonly reported drug allergy in adults and children. More than 95% of those with reported allergy labels to beta lactams are not confirmed when subjected to allergy testing. Beta lactam antibiotics are associated with a wide spectrum of immediate and delayed drug hypersensitivity reactions. The latency period to symptoms and clinical presentation aids in the causality assessment. Risk stratification based on diagnosis and timing then allows for appropriate management and evaluation. Skin prick testing, intradermal testing and oral challenge are well established for evaluation of immediate reactions. Delayed intradermal testing, patch testing and oral challenge can also be considered for evaluation of mild to moderate delayed reactions. Cross-reactivity between beta-lactams appears to be driven most commonly by a shared R1 side-chain. Standardized algorithms, protocols and pathways are needed for widespread implementation of a pragmatic and effective approach to patients reporting beta lactam allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Minaldi
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Elizabeth J Phillips
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
| | - Allison Norton
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Arikoglu T, Kont AO, Demirhan A, Yuksek BC, Tokmeci N, Kuyucu S. Risk stratification in beta-lactam allergy. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ALLERGY 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s40521-021-00295-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
7
|
Koosakulchai V, Sangsupawanich P, Wantanaset D, Jessadapakorn W, Jongvilaikasem P, Yuenyongviwat A. Safety of direct oral provocation testing using the Amoxicillin-2-step-challenge in children with history of non-immediate reactions to amoxicillin. World Allergy Organ J 2021; 14:100560. [PMID: 34306301 PMCID: PMC8283145 DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 05/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have shown that direct oral provocation tests, without prior skin testing, in children having delayed onset, benign rashes to beta-lactam antibiotic is safe and effective. Although, this test is useful in confirming drug hypersensitivity reactions, there is no standard protocol recommendation of drug provocation tests. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of the direct oral provocation test, using the Amoxicillin-2-step-challenge without prior skin testing, in children with history of non-immediate reactions to amoxicillin. METHODS The Amoxicillin-2-step-challenge protocol was performed in children with history of non-immediate reactions to amoxicillin. This protocol is composed of 2 doses of amoxicillin, with a 30-min interval; continued for a total of 5 days. All of the patients had not undergone skin testing before the oral provocation test. RESULTS This study included 54 children, having a median age of 6.6 years, with 70.4% being male. Amoxicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid were reported as the culprit drug in 75.9% and 24.1%, respectively. The index reactions were maculopapular (MP) rash in 79.6% and delayed urticarial rash/angioedema in 20.4%. Five patients (9.3%) had a reaction during the provocation test, all of these patients had delayed urticaria and were treated with oral antihistamine. However, 1 patient developed a fever alongside an MP rash. Laboratory investigation for this patient showed increased atypical lymphocytes and liver enzymes elevation. CONCLUSIONS Direct oral provocation tests, using the Amoxicillin-2-step-challenge, without prior skin testing, revealed good, immediate safety for the diagnosis of amoxicillin hypersensitivity in children with history of non-immediate reactions to amoxicillin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanlaya Koosakulchai
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - Pasuree Sangsupawanich
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - Duangdee Wantanaset
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - Wipa Jessadapakorn
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - Pondtip Jongvilaikasem
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - Araya Yuenyongviwat
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cardoso‐Fernandes A, Blumenthal KG, Chiriac AM, Tarrio I, Afonso‐João D, Delgado L, Fonseca JA, Azevedo LF, Sousa‐Pinto B. Frequency of severe reactions following penicillin drug provocation tests: A Bayesian meta-analysis. Clin Transl Allergy 2021; 11:e12008. [PMID: 34161664 PMCID: PMC8215894 DOI: 10.1002/clt2.12008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with a penicillin allergy label tend to have worse clinical outcomes and increased healthcare use. Drug provocation tests (DPT) are the gold-standard in the diagnostic workup of penicillin allergy, but safety concerns may hinder their performance. We aimed to assess the frequency of severe reactions following a DPT in patients with reported allergy to penicillins or other β-lactams. METHODS We performed a systematic review, searching MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science. We included primary studies assessing participants with a penicillin allergy label who underwent a DPT. We performed a Bayesian meta-analysis to estimate the pooled frequency of severe reactions to penicillin DPTs. Sources of heterogeneity were explored by subgroup and metaregression analyses. RESULTS We included 112 primary studies which included a total of 26,595 participants. The pooled frequency of severe reactions was estimated at 0.06% (95% credible interval [95% CrI] = 0.01%-0.13%; I2 = 57.9%). Most severe reactions (80/93; 86.0%) consisted of anaphylaxis. Compared to studies where the index reaction was immediate, we observed a lower frequency of severe reactions for studies assessing non-immediate index reactions (OR = 0.05; 95% CrI = 0-0.31). Patients reporting anaphylaxis as their index reaction were found to be at increased risk of developing severe reactions (OR = 13.5; 95% CrI = 7.7-21.5; I2 = 0.3%). Performance of direct DPTs in low-risk patients or testing with the suspected culprit drug were not associated with clinically relevant increased risk of severe reactions. CONCLUSIONS In patients with a penicillin allergy label, severe reactions resulting from DPTs are rare. Therefore, except for patients with potentially life-threatening index reactions or patients with positive skin tests-who were mostly not assessed in this analysis -, the safety of DPTs supports their performance in the diagnostic assessment of penicillin allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- António Cardoso‐Fernandes
- Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences (MEDCIDS)Faculty of Medicine, University of PortoPortoPortugal
- Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS)Faculty of Medicine, University of PortoPortoPortugal
| | - Kimberly G. Blumenthal
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of MedicineMassachusetts General HospitalBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Harvard Medical SchoolHarvard UniversityBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Anca Mirela Chiriac
- Department of PulmonologyDivision of Allergy, Hôpital Arnaud de VilleneuveUniversity Hospital of MontpellierMontpellierFrance
- UMR‐S 1136 INSERM‐Sorbonne UniversitéEquipe Epidémiologie des Maladies Allergiques et Respiratoires (EPAR)Institut Pierre Louis d’Epidémiologie et de Santé PubliqueParisFrance
| | - Isabel Tarrio
- Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS)Faculty of Medicine, University of PortoPortoPortugal
| | - David Afonso‐João
- Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS)Faculty of Medicine, University of PortoPortoPortugal
| | - Luís Delgado
- Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS)Faculty of Medicine, University of PortoPortoPortugal
- Basic and Clinical Immunology Unit, Department of Pathology, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal
| | - João Almeida Fonseca
- Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences (MEDCIDS)Faculty of Medicine, University of PortoPortoPortugal
- Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS)Faculty of Medicine, University of PortoPortoPortugal
| | - Luís Filipe Azevedo
- Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences (MEDCIDS)Faculty of Medicine, University of PortoPortoPortugal
- Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS)Faculty of Medicine, University of PortoPortoPortugal
| | - Bernardo Sousa‐Pinto
- Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences (MEDCIDS)Faculty of Medicine, University of PortoPortoPortugal
- Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS)Faculty of Medicine, University of PortoPortoPortugal
- Basic and Clinical Immunology Unit, Department of Pathology, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Felix MMR, Aun MV, Menezes UPD, Queiroz GRESD, Rodrigues AT, D'Onofrio-Silva AC, Perelló MI, Camelo-Nunes IC, Malaman MF. Allergy to penicillin and betalactam antibiotics. EINSTEIN-SAO PAULO 2021; 19:eMD5703. [PMID: 33909756 PMCID: PMC8054529 DOI: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2021md5703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Betalactams are the most frequent cause of hypersensitivity reactions to drugs mediated by a specific immune mechanism. Immediate reactions occur within 1 to 6 hours after betalactam administration, and are generally IgE-mediated. They clinically translate into urticaria, angioedema and anaphylaxis. Non-immediate or delayed reactions occur after 1 hour of administration. These are the most common reactions and are usually mediated by T cells. The most frequent type is the maculopapular or morbilliform exanthematous eruption. Most individuals who report allergies to penicillin and betalactams can tolerate this group of antibiotics. To make diagnosis, a detailed medical history is essential to verify whether it was an immediate or non-immediate reaction. Thereafter, in vivo and/or in vitro tests for investigation may be performed. The challenging test is considered the gold standard method for diagnosis of betalactam hypersensitivity. The first approach when suspecting a reaction to betalactam is to discontinue exposure to the drug, and the only specific treatment is desensitization, which has very precise indications. The misdiagnosis of penicillin allergy affects the health system, since the "penicillin allergy" label is associated with increased bacterial resistance, higher rate of therapeutic failure, prolonged hospitalizations, readmissions, and increased costs. Thus, it is essential to develop strategies to assist the prescription of antibiotics in patients identified with a label of "betalactam allergy" at hospitals, and to enhance education of patients and their caregivers, as well as of non-specialist physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mara Morelo Rocha Felix
- Escola de Medicina e Cirurgia, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Marcelo Vivolo Aun
- Faculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Ullissis Pádua de Menezes
- Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ayuso P, García-Martín E, Agúndez JAG. Variability of the Genes Involved in the Cellular Redox Status and Their Implication in Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions. Antioxidants (Basel) 2021; 10:antiox10020294. [PMID: 33672092 PMCID: PMC7919686 DOI: 10.3390/antiox10020294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Revised: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Adverse drug reactions are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Of the great diversity of drugs involved in hypersensitivity drug reactions, the most frequent are non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs followed by β-lactam antibiotics. The redox status regulates the level of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS). RONS interplay and modulate the action of diverse biomolecules, such as inflammatory mediators and drugs. In this review, we address the role of the redox status in the initiation, as well as in the resolution of inflammatory processes involved in drug hypersensitivity reactions. We summarize the association findings between drug hypersensitivity reactions and variants in the genes that encode the enzymes related to the redox system such as enzymes related to glutathione: Glutathione S-transferase (GSTM1, GSTP, GSTT1) and glutathione peroxidase (GPX1), thioredoxin reductase (TXNRD1 and TXNRD2), superoxide dismutase (SOD1, SOD2, and SOD3), catalase (CAT), aldo-keto reductase (AKR), and the peroxiredoxin system (PRDX1, PRDX2, PRDX3, PRDX4, PRDX5, PRDX6). Based on current evidence, the most relevant candidate redox genes related to hypersensitivity drug reactions are GSTM1, TXNRD1, SOD1, and SOD2. Increasing the understanding of pharmacogenetics in drug hypersensitivity reactions will contribute to the development of early diagnostic or prognosis tools, and will help to diminish the occurrence and/or the severity of these reactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Ayuso
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +34-927257000 (ext. 51038)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Doña I, Jurado-Escobar R, Pérez-Sánchez N, Laguna JJ, Bartra J, Testera-Montes A, de Santa María RS, Torres MJ, Cornejo-García JA. Genetic Variants Associated With Drug-Induced Hypersensitivity Reactions: towards Precision Medicine? CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ALLERGY 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s40521-020-00278-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
12
|
Caruso C, Valluzzi RL, Colantuono S, Gaeta F, Romano A. β-Lactam Allergy and Cross-Reactivity: A Clinician's Guide to Selecting an Alternative Antibiotic. J Asthma Allergy 2021; 14:31-46. [PMID: 33500632 PMCID: PMC7822086 DOI: 10.2147/jaa.s242061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
β-Lactams which include penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, and monobactams are the most common antibiotic classes reported to cause allergic reactions to drugs. This review is mainly about published studies assessing the cross-reactivity among β-lactams in penicillin- or cephalosporin-allergic subjects by carrying out diagnostic tests with alternative β-lactams and, if appropriate, graded challenges. Several studies demonstrated that cross-reactivity connected with the β-lactam ring, causing positive responses to allergy tests with all β-lactams, is infrequent in subjects with an IgE-mediated allergy and anecdotal in those with a T-cell-mediated allergy. Identities or similarities of β-lactam side-chain structures are mainly responsible for cross-reactivity among these antibiotics. For example, in aminopenicillin-allergic subjects, cross-reactivity with aminocephalosporins could possibly be over 30%. On the other hand, in a few prospective studies of penicillin-allergic individuals, less than 1% of cases show a cross-reactivity between penicillins and both aztreonam and carbapenems. Particular patterns of allergy-test positivity observed in some studies that assessed cross-reactivity among β-lactams seem to indicate that prior exposures may be responsible for coexisting sensitivities. Therefore, pre-treatment skin tests with the related β-lactams are suggested before administering them via graded challenges to β-lactam-allergic patients who need alternative β-lactams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristiano Caruso
- Allergy Unit, Columbus Hospital, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Rocco Luigi Valluzzi
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy, Pediatric Hospital Bambino Gesù, Rome, Vatican City, Italy
| | - Stefania Colantuono
- Allergy Unit, Columbus Hospital, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Gaeta
- Allergy Unit, Columbus Hospital, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonino Romano
- Oasi Research Institute-IRCCS, Troina, Italy
- Fondazione Mediterranea G.B. Morgagni, Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bogas G, Mayorga C, Martín-Serrano Á, Fernández-Santamaría R, Jiménez-Sánchez IM, Ariza A, Barrionuevo E, Posadas T, Salas M, Fernández TD, Torres MJ, Montañez MI. Penicillin and cephalosporin cross-reactivity: role of side chain and synthetic cefadroxil epitopes. Clin Transl Allergy 2020; 10:57. [PMID: 33292516 PMCID: PMC7716594 DOI: 10.1186/s13601-020-00368-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Analysis of cross-reactivity is necessary for prescribing safe cephalosporins for penicillin allergic patients. Amoxicillin (AX) is the betalactam most often involved in immediate hypersensitivity reactions (IHRs), and cefadroxil (CX) the most likely cephalosporin to cross-react with AX, since they share the same R1 side chain, unlike cefuroxime (CO), with a structurally different R1. We aimed to analyse cross-reactivity with CX and CO in patients with confirmed IHRs to AX, including sIgE recognition to AX, CX, CO, and novel synthetic determinants of CX. METHODS Fifty-four patients with confirmed IHRs to AX based on skin test (ST) and/or drug provocation test (DPT) were included. Serum sIgE to AX and benzylpenicillin was determined by Radioallergosorbent test (RAST). Two potential determinants of CX, involving intact or modified R1 structure, with open betalactam ring, were synthesised and sIgE evaluated by RAST inhibition assay. RESULTS Tolerance to CX (Group A) was observed in 64.8% cases and cross-reactivity in 35.2% cases (Group B). Cross-reactivity with CO was only found in 1.8% cases from Group B. ST to CX showed a negative predictive value of 94.6%. RAST inhibition assays showed higher recognition to CX as well as to both synthetic determinants (66% of positive cases) in Group B. CONCLUSIONS Cross-reactivity with CX in AX allergic patients is 35%, being ST not enough for prediction. R1, although critical for recognition, is not the unique factor. The synthetic determinants of CX, 1-(HOPhG-Ser-Bu) and 2-(pyrazinone) are promising tools for determining in vitro cross-reactivity to CX in AX allergic patients.
Collapse
Grants
- PI12/02529, PI15/01206, PI18/00095, RETIC ARADYAL RD16/0006/0001 Instituto de Salud Carlos III
- CP15/00103, PI17/01237 Instituto de Salud Carlos III
- JR18/00054 Instituto de Salud Carlos III
- CD17/0146 Instituto de Salud Carlos III
- CTS-06603 Consejería de Economía, Innovación, Ciencia y Empleo, Junta de Andalucía (ES)
- C-0044-2012 SAS2013 Consejería de Salud, Junta de Andalucía
- PI-0699-2011, PI-0179-2014 Consejería de Salud, Junta de Andalucía
- PE-0172-2018 Consejería de Salud, Junta de Andalucía
- PE-0172-2018 Consejería de Salud, Junta de Andalucía
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gador Bogas
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA, Hospital Civil, 29009 Málaga, Spain
- Allergy Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Hospital Civil, 29009 Málaga, Spain
| | - Cristobalina Mayorga
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA, Hospital Civil, 29009 Málaga, Spain
- Allergy Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Hospital Civil, 29009 Málaga, Spain
- Nanostructures for Diagnosing and Treatment of Allergic Diseases Laboratory, Andalusian Center for Nanomedicine and Biotechnology-BIONAND, Parque Tecnológico de Andalucía, 29590 Málaga, Spain
| | - Ángela Martín-Serrano
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA, Hospital Civil, 29009 Málaga, Spain
- Nanostructures for Diagnosing and Treatment of Allergic Diseases Laboratory, Andalusian Center for Nanomedicine and Biotechnology-BIONAND, Parque Tecnológico de Andalucía, 29590 Málaga, Spain
| | - Rubén Fernández-Santamaría
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA, Hospital Civil, 29009 Málaga, Spain
| | - Isabel M. Jiménez-Sánchez
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA, Hospital Civil, 29009 Málaga, Spain
- Nanostructures for Diagnosing and Treatment of Allergic Diseases Laboratory, Andalusian Center for Nanomedicine and Biotechnology-BIONAND, Parque Tecnológico de Andalucía, 29590 Málaga, Spain
| | - Adriana Ariza
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA, Hospital Civil, 29009 Málaga, Spain
| | - Esther Barrionuevo
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA, Hospital Civil, 29009 Málaga, Spain
- Allergy Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Hospital Civil, 29009 Málaga, Spain
| | - Teresa Posadas
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA, Hospital Civil, 29009 Málaga, Spain
- Allergy Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Hospital Civil, 29009 Málaga, Spain
| | - María Salas
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA, Hospital Civil, 29009 Málaga, Spain
- Allergy Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Hospital Civil, 29009 Málaga, Spain
| | - Tahía Diana Fernández
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA, Hospital Civil, 29009 Málaga, Spain
- Departamento de Biología Celular, Genética y Fisiología, Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain
| | - María José Torres
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA, Hospital Civil, 29009 Málaga, Spain
- Allergy Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Hospital Civil, 29009 Málaga, Spain
- Nanostructures for Diagnosing and Treatment of Allergic Diseases Laboratory, Andalusian Center for Nanomedicine and Biotechnology-BIONAND, Parque Tecnológico de Andalucía, 29590 Málaga, Spain
- Departamento de Medicina, Universidad de Málaga, Facultad de Medicina, 29071 Málaga, Spain
| | - María Isabel Montañez
- Allergy Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga-IBIMA, Hospital Civil, 29009 Málaga, Spain
- Nanostructures for Diagnosing and Treatment of Allergic Diseases Laboratory, Andalusian Center for Nanomedicine and Biotechnology-BIONAND, Parque Tecnológico de Andalucía, 29590 Málaga, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Schrüfer P, Brockow K, Stoevesandt J, Trautmann A. Predominant patterns of β-lactam hypersensitivity in a single German Allergy Center: exanthem induced by aminopenicillins, anaphylaxis by cephalosporins. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol 2020; 16:102. [PMID: 33292467 PMCID: PMC7672956 DOI: 10.1186/s13223-020-00488-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Penicillins and other β-lactam antibiotics are the most common elicitors of allergic drug reaction. However, data on the pattern of clinical reaction types elicited by specific β-lactams are scarce and inconsistent. We aimed to determine patterns of β-latam allergy, i.e. the association of a clinical reaction type with a specific β-lactam antibiotic. Methods We retrospectively evaluated data from 800 consecutive patients with suspected β-lactam hypersensitivity over a period of 11 years in a single German Allergy Center. Results β-lactam hypersensitivity was definitely excluded in 595 patients, immediate-type (presumably IgE-mediated) hypersensitivity was diagnosed in 70 and delayed-type hypersensitivity in 135 cases. Most (59 out of 70, 84.3%) immediate-type anaphylactic reactions were induced by a limited number of cephalosporins. Delayed reactions were regularly caused by an aminopenicillin (127 out of 135, 94.1%) and usually manifested as a measles-like exanthem (117 out of 135, 86.7%). Intradermal testing proved to be the most useful method for diagnosing β-lactam allergy, but prick testing was already positive in 24 out of 70 patients with immediate-type hypersensitivity (34.3%). Patch testing in addition to intradermal testing did not provide additional information for the diagnosis of delayed-type hypersensitivity. Almost all β-lactam allergic patients tolerated at least one, usually several alternative substances out of the β-lactam group. Conclusions We identified two patterns of β-lactam hypersensitivity: aminopenicillin-induced exanthem and anaphylaxis triggered by certain cephalosporins. Intradermal skin testing was the most useful method to detect both IgE-mediated and delayed-type β-lactam hypersensitivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Schrüfer
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Allergy Center Mainfranken, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Knut Brockow
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Technical University of Munich, 80802, Munich, Germany
| | - Johanna Stoevesandt
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Allergy Center Mainfranken, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Axel Trautmann
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Allergy Center Mainfranken, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
The use of direct oral challenge to confirm allergies to penicillin class antibiotics in Danish children. BMC Pediatr 2020; 20:523. [PMID: 33190633 PMCID: PMC7667840 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-020-02407-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A high number of children are referred to pediatric departments with a suspected allergic reaction to antibiotics. The prevalence of true allergy is considered to be significantly lower than shown from clinical history and symptoms alone. This study investigated the historical use of direct oral challenges at three specialist pediatric departments in Denmark. Methods In this retrospective medical record review study, 141 children (69 boys and 72 girls) with a clinical history of suspected penicillin class allergy were investigated. A standardized questionnaire for drug allergy was completed in the beginning of the investigation, which also included a skin prick test (SPT), measurement of IgE to different types of penicillin, and a drug challenge (DC). Results Only four (2.8%) of the patients referred for further investigation in our study had a positive DC. We found no correlation between a positive DC, positive SPT or elevated specific IgE. None of the patients with a positive DC reacted with a rash alone prior to investigation. Conclusions Allergy to penicillin in children is rare and probably overestimated. In children reacting to penicillin with a rash alone, our study indicated that the rash was probably not related to allergy and treatment should thus be continued.
Collapse
|
16
|
Dias de Castro E, Leblanc A, Barbosa J, Ribeiro L, Cernadas JR. Psychological profiles of patients with suspected drug allergy. Asia Pac Allergy 2020; 10:e39. [PMID: 33178564 PMCID: PMC7610082 DOI: 10.5415/apallergy.2020.10.e39] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Several studies demonstrate an important association between allergic diseases and patients' psychological characteristics. Objective To evaluate any differences in the psychological characteristics of patients studied for suspected drug allergy in comparison with healthy controls. A secondary aim was to assess differences between patients with confirmed versus excluded drug allergy, with respect to the clinical aspects. Methods The psychological characteristics of 115 consecutive patients >16 years-old, studied for suspected drug allergy were assessed. They were compared with healthy controls. Four validated questionnaires were used to evaluate anxiety, depression, alexithymia, and personality type. Results Eighty-eight patients completed the evaluation: 34 had confirmed drug allergy and 33 excluded. Forty-eight healthy subjects filled the 4 questionnaires. Increased neuroticism was associated with increased odds of belonging to the excluded drug allergy group (odds ratio [OR], 1.374; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.173–1.609). Increased neuroticism (OR, 1.244; 95% CI, 1.065–1.453) and increased anxiety (OR, 1.210; 95% CI, 1.084–1.351) were associated with increased odds of confirmed drug allergy. However, higher extraversion decreased this likelihood (OR, 0.755; 95% CI, 0.643–0.888). The odds of having confirmed drug allergy was reduced by 79.7% (OR, 0.203; 95% CI, 0.060–0.694) for patients with 2 suspected drugs and by 84.6% (OR, 0.154; 95% CI, 0.029–0.809) for those with ≥3 in comparison to those with only one. Patients with moderate to severe reactions were more likely to have confirmed drug allergy (OR, 4.295; 95% CI, 1.105–16.693) than those with milder manifestations. Conclusion Our results highlight that patients with drug allergy have a distinctive psychological profile. Psychological assessment may help to identify patients that would benefit from a targeted intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eunice Dias de Castro
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de S. João EPE, Porto, Portugal.,MedInUP- Center for Drug Discover and Innovative Medicines, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Ana Leblanc
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de S. João EPE, Porto, Portugal
| | - Joselina Barbosa
- Public Health and Forensic Sciences and Medical Education Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,UNIC- Cardiovascular Research and Development Unit, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Laura Ribeiro
- Public Health and Forensic Sciences and Medical Education Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Biomedicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,I3S- Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Josefina R Cernadas
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de S. João EPE, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tang MM, Fok JS, Thong BYH, Yun J, Li PH, Kang HR, Thien F, Yamaguchi M, Lucas M, Chang YS, Kim BK, Nagao M, Rengganis I, Tsai YG, Chung WH, Rerkpattanapipat T, Kamchaisatian W, Leung TF, Ho JY, Zhang L, Latiff AHA, Fujisawa T, Castells MC, Demoly P, Wang JY, Pawankar R. Diagnostic procedures & practices in drug allergy/hypersensitivity: a survey of 13 Asian countries. Asia Pac Allergy 2020; 10:e36. [PMID: 33178561 PMCID: PMC7610088 DOI: 10.5415/apallergy.2020.10.e36] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Accepted: 10/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The issues and challenges in the diagnosis of drug allergy/hypersensitivity among children and adults in Asia are likely to be different from non-Asian countries. OBJECTIVE To study the diagnostic modalities used in the evaluation and management of drug allergy/drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) among member societies of the Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology (APAAACI). METHODS A questionnaire comprising 41 questions was circulated electronically to member societies and individual members of APAAACI between January 23, 2020 and March 6, 2020. RESULTS Twenty-six respondents from 15 member societies and 1 individual member responded. European DHR guidelines were most commonly used. Skin prick and intradermal testing was used by 100%, with only 60% having access to commercial penicillin skin test reagents. In vitro-specific IgE tests were used by 75%, and basophil activation test by 56.3% for immediate DHR. Patch tests were used by 75% in contrast to lymphocyte transformation tests by 25% for nonimmediate DHR. Drug provocation tests were used by 68.8%, the most common indication being to exclude hypersensitivity where history/symptoms were not suggestive of drug hypersensitivity/allergy (93.3%). Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genotype testing was mandatory among 25% respondents before new carbamazepine prescriptions, and 8.3% for allopurinol prescriptions. CONCLUSIONS There was increased use of skin testing for iodinated contrast media hypersensitivity and patch testing for nonimmediate DHR. HLA genotype testing prior to new carbamazepine, allopurinol and abacavir prescriptions remain variable despite strong associations for severe cutaneous adverse reactions with Asian ethnicity. Results of this survey form a useful framework for developing educational and training needs and for improving access to drug allergy diagnostic and treatment modalities across APAAACI member societies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jie Shen Fok
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Box Hill Hospital, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Bernard Yu-Hor Thong
- Department of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - James Yun
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Division of Medicine, Nepean Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Philip Hei Li
- Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Hye-Ryun Kang
- Institute of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Korea; Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Drug Safety Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Francis Thien
- Eastern Health, Melbourne; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Masao Yamaguchi
- Division of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Department of Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Michaela Lucas
- Department of Immunology, Pathwest and Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia; Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Yoon-Seok Chang
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Byung-Keun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Medical Center Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mizuho Nagao
- Allergy Center of Mie National Hospital, Tsu, Japan
| | - Iris Rengganis
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia - Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Yi-Giien Tsai
- School of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Hung Chung
- Department of Dermatology, Drug Hypersensitivity Clinical and Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung and Linkou Branches, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ticha Rerkpattanapipat
- Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology Division, Department of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Wasu Kamchaisatian
- Pediatric Allergy and Immunology Division, Samitivej Children's Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Ting Fan Leung
- Department of Paediatrics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Joo-Yoon Ho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Luo Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Nasal Diseases, Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology, Beijing, China
| | | | | | - Mariana C Castells
- Division of Rheumatology, Immunology, and Allergy, Department of Medicine, Mastocytosis Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Pascal Demoly
- Division of Allergy, Department of Pulmonology, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France; UPMC Univ Paris 06, UMRS 1136, Equipe - EPAR - IPLESP, Sorbonne Universités, Paris, France
| | - Jiu Yao Wang
- Department of Pediatrics, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Ruby Pawankar
- Department of Pediatrics, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Felix MMR, Kuschnir FC. Direct Oral Provocation Test Is Safe and Effective in Diagnosing Beta-Lactam Allergy in Low-Risk Children With Mild Cutaneous Reactions. Front Pharmacol 2020; 11:1223. [PMID: 32903694 PMCID: PMC7438762 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2020.01223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mara Morelo Rocha Felix
- Department of General Medicine, School of Medicine and Surgery, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.,Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Federal dos Servidores do Estado, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.,Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Fundação Técnico Educacional Souza Marques, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Fábio Chigres Kuschnir
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Fundação Técnico Educacional Souza Marques, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.,Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wurpts G, Aberer W, Dickel H, Brehler R, Jakob T, Kreft B, Mahler V, Merk HF, Mülleneisen N, Ott H, Pfützner W, Röseler S, Ruëff F, Sitter H, Sunderkötter C, Trautmann A, Treudler R, Wedi B, Worm M, Brockow K. Guideline on diagnostic procedures for suspected hypersensitivity to beta-lactam antibiotics: Guideline of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI) in collaboration with the German Society of Allergology (AeDA), German Society for Pediatric Allergology and Environmental Medicine (GPA), the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG), the Austrian Society for Allergology and Immunology (ÖGAI), and the Paul-Ehrlich Society for Chemotherapy (PEG). Allergol Select 2020; 4:11-43. [PMID: 32568254 PMCID: PMC7304290 DOI: 10.5414/alx02104e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
This guideline on diagnostic procedures for suspected beta-lactam antibiotic (BLA) hypersensitivity was written by the German and Austrian professional associations for allergology, and the Paul-Ehrlich Society for Chemotherapy in a consensus procedure according to the criteria of the German Association of Scientific Medical Societies. BLA such as penicillins and cephalosporins represent the drug group that most frequently triggers drug allergies. However, the frequency of reports of suspected allergy in patient histories clearly exceeds the number of confirmed cases. The large number of suspected BLA allergies has a significant impact on, e.g., the quality of treatment received by the individual patient and the costs to society as a whole. Allergies to BLA are based on different immunological mechanisms and often manifest as maculopapular exanthema, as well as anaphylaxis; and there are also a number of less frequent special clinical manifestations of drug allergic reactions. All BLA have a beta-lactam ring. BLA are categorized into different classes: penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, monobactams, and beta-lactamase inhibitors with different chemical structures. Knowledge of possible cross-reactivity is of considerable clinical significance. Whereas allergy to the common beta-lactam ring occurs in only a small percentage of all BLA allergic patients, cross-reactivity due to side chain similarities, such as aminopenicillins and aminocephalosporins, and even methoxyimino cephalosporins, are more common. However, the overall picture is complex and its elucidation may require further research. Diagnostic procedures used in BLA allergy are usually made up of four components: patient history, laboratory diagnostics, skin testing (which is particularly important), and drug provocation testing. The diagnostic approach - even in cases where the need to administer a BLA is acute - is guided by patient history and risk - benefit ratio in the individual case. Here again, further studies are required to extend the present state of knowledge. Performing allergy testing for suspected BLA hypersensitivity is urgently recommended not only in the interests of providing the patient with good medical care, but also due to the immense impact of putative BLA allergies on society as a whole.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerda Wurpts
- Clinic for Dermatology and Allergology, Aachen Comprehensive Allergy Center (ACAC), Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Germany
| | - Werner Aberer
- Department of Dermatology, Graz Medical University, Graz, Austria,
| | - Heinrich Dickel
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, St. Josef Hospital, University Hospital of the Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum,
| | - Randolf Brehler
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Münster, Münster,
| | - Thilo Jakob
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital Gießen und Marburg, Gießen Site, Gießen,
| | - Burkhard Kreft
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University, Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale),
| | - Vera Mahler
- Paul-Ehrlich Institute, Langen,
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen,
| | - Hans F. Merk
- Clinic for Dermatology and Allergology, Aachen Comprehensive Allergy Center (ACAC), Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Hagen Ott
- Division of Pediatric Dermatology and Allergology, Auf der Bult Children’s Hospital, Hannover,
| | - Wolfgang Pfützner
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital Gießen und Marburg, Marburg Site, Marburg,
| | - Stefani Röseler
- Clinic for Dermatology and Allergology, Aachen Comprehensive Allergy Center (ACAC), Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Germany
| | - Franziska Ruëff
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich,
| | - Helmut Sitter
- Institute of Surgical Research, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg,
| | - Cord Sunderkötter
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University, Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale),
| | - Axel Trautmann
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Allergy Center Mainfranken, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg,
| | - Regina Treudler
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology and Leipzig Interdisciplinary Center for Allergology – LICA-CAC, University of Leipzig, Leipzig,
| | - Bettina Wedi
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Comprehensive Allergy Center, Hannover Medical School, Hannover,
| | - Margitta Worm
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, Charité University Hospital Berlin, Allergy Center Charité (ACC), Berlin, and
| | - Knut Brockow
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology am Biederstein, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sousa-Pinto B, Tarrio I, Blumenthal KG, Araújo L, Azevedo LF, Delgado L, Fonseca JA. Accuracy of penicillin allergy diagnostic tests: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2020; 147:296-308. [PMID: 32446963 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.04.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Revised: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Having a penicillin allergy label associates with a higher risk for antibiotic resistance and increased health care use. OBJECTIVE We sought to assess the accuracy of skin tests and specific IgE quantification in the diagnostic evaluation of patients reporting a penicillin/β-lactam allergy. METHODS We performed a systematic review and diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis, searching on MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science. We included studies conducted in patients reporting a penicillin allergy and in whom skin tests and/or specific IgE quantification were performed and compared with drug challenge results. We quantitatively assessed the accuracy of diagnostic tests with bivariate random-effects meta-analyses. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed to explore causes of heterogeneity. Studies' quality was evaluated using QUADAS-2 criteria. RESULTS We included 105 primary studies, assessing 31,761 participants. Twenty-seven studies were assessed by bivariate meta-analysis. Skin tests had a summary sensitivity of 30.7% (95% CI, 18.9%-45.9%) and a specificity of 96.8% (95% CI, 94.2%-98.3%), with a partial area under the summary receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.686 (I2 = 38.2%). Similar results were observed for subanalyses restricted to patients reporting nonimmediate maculopapular exanthema or urticaria/angioedema. Specific IgE had a summary sensitivity of 19.3% (95% CI, 12.0%-29.4%) and a specificity of 97.4% (95% CI, 95.2%-98.6%), with a partial area under the summary receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.420 (I2 = 8.5%). Projected predictive values mainly reflect the low frequency of true penicillin allergy. CONCLUSIONS Skin tests and specific IgE quantification appear to have low sensitivity and high specificity. Because current evidence is insufficient for assessing the role of these tests in stratifying patients for delabeling, we identified key requirements needed for future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernardo Sousa-Pinto
- MEDCIDS, Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; CINTESIS, Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Basic and Clinical Immunology Unit, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
| | - Isabel Tarrio
- MEDCIDS, Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Kimberly G Blumenthal
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass
| | - Luís Araújo
- CINTESIS, Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Basic and Clinical Immunology Unit, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Luís Filipe Azevedo
- MEDCIDS, Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; CINTESIS, Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Luís Delgado
- CINTESIS, Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Basic and Clinical Immunology Unit, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - João Almeida Fonseca
- MEDCIDS, Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; CINTESIS, Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Li PH, Yeung HHF, Lau CS, Au EYL. Prevalence, Incidence, and Sensitization Profile of β-lactam Antibiotic Allergy in Hong Kong. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e204199. [PMID: 32374398 PMCID: PMC7203606 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.4199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Allergy to β-lactam antibiotics is one of the most frequently reported drug reactions, but epidemiological data in Chinese populations are lacking. Ethnic- and region-specific sensitization patterns of skin testing for β-lactam antibiotic allergy are also unknown. OBJECTIVE To identify the prevalence, 1-year incidence, and sensitization patterns of β-lactam antibiotic allergy in patients in Hong Kong. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cross-sectional study obtained territorywide, anonymized electronic patient data from the Clinical Management Systems of the Hospital Authority, the sole publicly funded health care system in Hong Kong with facilities in 7 regions (Hong Kong East, Hong Kong West, Kowloon Central, Kowloon East, Kowloon West, New Territories East, and New Territories West). All referrals to Queen Mary Hospital for β-lactam antibiotic allergy testing from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019, were also analyzed for sensitization patterns. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Prevalence and cumulative incidence of β-lactam antibiotic allergy reported in Hong Kong, and sensitization patterns according to β-lactam antibiotic allergy skin testing. RESULTS Complete records of 7 184 271 unique patients were analyzed, with a men to women ratio of 1:1.2 and with a median age of 44 years. The prevalence of physician-reported β-lactam antibiotic allergy was 2.0%, and the cumulative incidence was 107 per 100 000 population. Of the 34 402 new drug allergies reported in 2018, 8032 (23.3%) were β-lactam antibiotic allergies. Three hundred fifty-five patients with reactions suggestive of β-lactam antibiotic allergy underwent skin testing, and only 49 (13.8%; 95% CI, 10.64%-17.90%) of them had positive test results. Of these 49 patients, 14 (28.6%; 95% CI, 18.35%-44.49%) had selective reaction and 35 (71.4%; 95% CI, 59.84%-85.27%) had nonselective reaction. The sensitization rate to either benzylpenicilloyl polylysine or a minor determinant (benzylpenicilloate) was 47.0% (n = 23; 95% CI, 34.85%-63.21%), with 10 patients monosensitized to benzylpenicilloyl polylysine only (20.4%; 95% CI, 11.74%-35.48%) and 5 to benzylpenicilloate only (10.2%; 95% CI, 4.45%-23.42%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Results of this study suggest that patients in Hong Kong with β-lactam antibiotic allergy had much higher rates of monosensitization to benzylpenicilloyl polylysine and benzylpenicilloate, making these reagents essential in β-lactam antibiotic skin tests. Such a finding warrants future studies into whether this sensitization is specific to ethnicity or region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip H. Li
- Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Heather H. F. Yeung
- Division of Clinical Immunology, Department of Pathology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Chak-Sing Lau
- Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - Elaine Y. L. Au
- Division of Clinical Immunology, Department of Pathology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Refractory Unforeseen Anaphylaxis Case in a Rural OR Unit. Case Rep Surg 2020; 2020:5283279. [PMID: 32047699 PMCID: PMC7007949 DOI: 10.1155/2020/5283279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2019] [Revised: 10/21/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
A 35-year-old female patient with no previously documented allergies who was admitted for elective gynaecological surgery, developed rapid onset, severe anaphylaxis, with dyspnea and cardiovascular collapse, in the operating theatre after receiving routine IV cefazolin prior to induction of anesthesia. She failed to improve with two doses of intramuscular epinephrine followed by two boluses of intravenous epinephrine, but responded to an epinephrine infusion. She was assessed by Internal Medicine and discharged home the following day. This event demonstrates the speed, severity, and profound hypotension in an allergic reaction from intravenous medication, challenges in managing anaphylaxis, and importance of prompt administration of epinephrine via IM route, followed by IV if necessary, in the OR. The case highlighted the inability to ascertain the causative agent through typical allergy testing.
Collapse
|
23
|
Ariza A, Fernández T, Bogas G, Torres M, Mayorga C. How Mechanism Knowledge Can Help to Management of Drug Hypersensitivity. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ALLERGY 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s40521-020-00244-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
24
|
Stone CA, Trubiano J, Coleman DT, Rukasin CRF, Phillips EJ. The challenge of de-labeling penicillin allergy. Allergy 2020; 75:273-288. [PMID: 31049971 DOI: 10.1111/all.13848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2018] [Revised: 03/28/2019] [Accepted: 04/23/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Even though 8%-25% of most populations studied globally are labeled as penicillin allergic, most diagnoses of penicillin allergy are made in childhood and relate to events that are either not allergic in nature, are low risk for immediate hypersensitivity, or are a potential true allergy that has waned over time. Penicillin allergy labels directly impact antimicrobial stewardship by leading to use of less effective and broader spectrum antimicrobials and are associated with antimicrobial resistance. They may also delay appropriate antimicrobial therapy and lead to increased risk of specific adverse healthcare outcomes. Operationalizing penicillin allergy de-labeling into a new arm of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) has become an increasing global focus. METHODS We performed an evidence-based narrative review of the literature of penicillin allergy label carriage, the adverse effects of penicillin allergy labels, and current approaches and barriers to penicillin allergy de-labeling. Over the period 1928-2018 in Pubmed and Medline, search terms used included "penicillin allergy" or "penicillin hypersensitivity" alone or in combination with "adverse events," "testing," "evaluation," "effects," "label," "de-labeling," "prick or epicutaneous," and "intradermal" skin testing, "oral challenge or provocation," "cross-reactivity," and "antimicrobial stewardship". RESULTS Penicillin allergy labels are highly prevalent, largely inaccurate and their carriage may lead to unnecessary treatment and inferior outcomes with alternative agents as well as adverse public health outcomes such as antibiotic resistance. CONCLUSIONS Operationalizing penicillin allergy de-labeling as an aspect of ASP has become an increasing global focus. There is a need for validated approaches that optimally combine the use of history and ingestion challenge with or without proceeding formal skin testing to tackle penicillin allergy efficiently within complex healthcare systems. At the same time, there is great promise for penicillin allergy evaluation and de-labeling as an individual and public health strategy to reduce adverse healthcare outcomes, improve antimicrobial stewardship, and decrease healthcare costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cosby A. Stone
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee
| | - Jason Trubiano
- Department of Infectious Diseases Austin Health Heidelberg Victoria Australia
- Department of Infectious Diseases Centre for Antibiotic Allergy and Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Melbourne Victoria Australia
- Department of Medicine (Austin Health) University of Melbourne Parkville Victoria Australia
- The National Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Parkville Victoria Australia
| | - David T. Coleman
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee
| | - Christine R. F. Rukasin
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee
| | - Elizabeth J. Phillips
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee
- Department of Pharmacology Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Nashville Tennessee
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee
- Institute for Immunology & Infectious Diseases Murdoch University Murdoch Western Australia Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ansotegui IJ, Melioli G, Canonica GW, Caraballo L, Villa E, Ebisawa M, Passalacqua G, Savi E, Ebo D, Gómez RM, Luengo Sánchez O, Oppenheimer JJ, Jensen-Jarolim E, Fischer DA, Haahtela T, Antila M, Bousquet JJ, Cardona V, Chiang WC, Demoly PM, DuBuske LM, Ferrer Puga M, Gerth van Wijk R, González Díaz SN, Gonzalez-Estrada A, Jares E, Kalpaklioğlu AF, Kase Tanno L, Kowalski ML, Ledford DK, Monge Ortega OP, Morais Almeida M, Pfaar O, Poulsen LK, Pawankar R, Renz HE, Romano AG, Rosário Filho NA, Rosenwasser L, Sánchez Borges MA, Scala E, Senna GE, Sisul JC, Tang ML, Thong BYH, Valenta R, Wood RA, Zuberbier T. IgE allergy diagnostics and other relevant tests in allergy, a World Allergy Organization position paper. World Allergy Organ J 2020; 13:100080. [PMID: 32128023 PMCID: PMC7044795 DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2019.100080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 224] [Impact Index Per Article: 56.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2019] [Accepted: 10/08/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Currently, testing for immunoglobulin E (IgE) sensitization is the cornerstone of diagnostic evaluation in suspected allergic conditions. This review provides a thorough and updated critical appraisal of the most frequently used diagnostic tests, both in vivo and in vitro. It discusses skin tests, challenges, and serological and cellular in vitro tests, and provides an overview of indications, advantages and disadvantages of each in conditions such as respiratory, food, venom, drug, and occupational allergy. Skin prick testing remains the first line approach in most instances; the added value of serum specific IgE to whole allergen extracts or components, as well as the role of basophil activation tests, is evaluated. Unproven, non-validated, diagnostic tests are also discussed. Throughout the review, the reader must bear in mind the relevance of differentiating between sensitization and allergy; the latter entails not only allergic sensitization, but also clinically relevant symptoms triggered by the culprit allergen.
Collapse
Key Words
- AAAAI, American Academy of Allergy Asthma and Immunology
- ABA, Allergen Bead Array
- ACAAI, American College of Allergy Asthma and Immunology
- AEC, Allergen Exposure Chambers
- AIT, allergen immunotherapy
- AP, Alkaline Phosphatase
- AU/mL, Allergenic Units milliLiter
- Allergy
- Anti-IgE, Antibody against IgE
- BAT, Basophil Activation Test
- BAU/mL, Biologic Allergenic Units milliLiter
- CBA, Cytometric Bead Array
- CCD, Cross-reactive Carbohydrate Determinants
- CDER, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (USA)
- CL, Chemiluminescence
- CaFE, Calibrated Fluorescence Enhancement
- DBPCFC, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Food Challenge
- Diagnostic strategies
- EAACI, European Academy of Allergy and Immunology
- EIA, Enzyme Immune Assay
- ELISA, Enzyme Linked Immuno Sorbent Analysis
- EMEA, European MEdicine Agencies
- ENPP-3, EctoNucleotide Pyrophosphatase/Phosphodiesterase 3
- FACS, Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting
- FDA, Food and Drug Administration (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services)
- FEIA, Fluorescent Enzyme Immunoassays
- FcεRI, High affinity IgE receptor
- H1, Histamine 1 receptor
- H2, Histamine 2 receptor
- HPO, Horseradish Peroxidase
- IDT, Intradermal Test
- ISAC, Immuno-Solid phase Allergen Chip
- IUIS, International Union of Immunological Societies
- IVD, in vitro diagnostic tool
- IgE
- IgE, immunoglobulin E
- In vitro tests
- LAMP-3, Lysosomal-Associated Membrane Protein
- MBAD, Molecule Based Allergy Diagnostics
- MRGPRX2, Mas-related G protein receptor 2
- NIH, National Institutes of Health (USA)
- NMBAs, NeuroMuscular Blocking Agents
- NPA, Negative Percent Agreement
- NSAIDs, Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
- PPA, Positive Percent Agreement
- PPT, Prick-Prick Test
- RAST, Radio Allergo Sorbent Test
- SCAR, severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions
- SPT, Skin prick test
- Skin tests
- kUA/L, kilo Units of Allergen/Liter for allergen-specific IgE antibody assays
- mAb, Monoclonal Antibody
- pNPP, p-Nitrophenylphosphate
- sIgE, specific IgE
- w/v, weight /volume
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Giovanni Melioli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Walter Canonica
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Luis Caraballo
- Institute for Immunological Research, University of Cartagena, Cartagena, Colombia
| | - Elisa Villa
- Azienda Sanitaria Locale di Vercelli, S.C. Pneumologia, Vercelli, Italia
| | - Motohiro Ebisawa
- Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, Sagamihara National Hospital, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Giovanni Passalacqua
- Allergy and Respiratory Diseases, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Didier Ebo
- Department of Immunology - Allergology - Rheumatology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp University, Department Immunology and Allergology, AZ Jan Palfijn Gent, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Olga Luengo Sánchez
- Allergy Section, Department of Internal Medicine, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Erika Jensen-Jarolim
- Institute for Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center of Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, The Interuniversity Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - David A. Fischer
- Fischer Medicine Professional Corporation, Barrie, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tari Haahtela
- Skin and Allergy Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Jean J. Bousquet
- MACVIA-France, Montpellier, France
- INSERM, Villejuif, France
- Université Versailles St-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Montigny le Bretonneux, France
- Euforea, Brussels, Belgium
- CHU Montpellier, France
| | - Victoria Cardona
- Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Servicio de Medicina Interna, Sección de Alergología, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Wen Chin Chiang
- Mount Elizabeth Medical Centre, Chiang Children's Allergy & Asthma Clinic, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Pascal M. Demoly
- University Hospital Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | | | - Marta Ferrer Puga
- The Unidad de Educación Médica, Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Clinica Universitad de Navarra, Navarra, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Marek L. Kowalski
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Immunology & Allergy, Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland
| | | | | | | | - Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Rhinology and Allergy, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Lars K. Poulsen
- Gentofte University Hospital, Lab for Allergology, Allergy Clinic, Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Ruby Pawankar
- Nippon Medical School, Dept. of Otolaryngology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Harald E. Renz
- University Hospital GI & MR GmbH, Institute of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, Standort Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Lanny Rosenwasser
- University of Missouri at Kansas City, School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | | | - Enrico Scala
- Experimental Allergy Unit, Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Mimi L.K. Tang
- Royal Children's Hospital, Department of Allergy & Immunology, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Bernard Yu-Hor Thong
- Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Deptartment of Rheumatology, Allergy & Immunology, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Rudolf Valenta
- Division of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- NRC Institute of Immunology FMBA of Russia, Moscow, Russia
- Laboratory of Immunopathology, Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Robert A. Wood
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Torsten Zuberbier
- Campus Charite Mitte, Klinik fur Dermatologie & Allergologie, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Petersen BT, Gradman J. Prospective study of 5-day challenge with penicillins in children. BMJ Paediatr Open 2020; 4:e000734. [PMID: 32818157 PMCID: PMC7406022 DOI: 10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2020] [Revised: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine if a 5-day challenge with penicillin improves the diagnostic sensitivity compared with a single full dose in children with mild skin reactions. DESIGN Subjects referred with suspected allergy to penicillin were consecutively included. Irrespectively of the morphology of the index reaction and the result of specific IgE, all subjects underwent a two-step titrated drug provocation test (DPT) with the culprit drug followed by a 5-day challenge at home. PARTICIPANTS Children and adolescents aged 0-18 years referred to allergic workup for penicillin hypersensitivity at two paediatric Danish centres. Only subjects with non-severe skin reactions were included. RESULTS A total of 305 subjects were included and 22 (7%) of the DPTs were positive. Three subjects reacted within 1 hour of the first full dose and nine reacted 1-8 hours after the first full dose. Additional 10 positive reactions were observed during the prolonged provocation. Seven subjects reacted after the second full dose and three reacted after 3-6 days. Only mild skin rashes were observed. Eighteen subjects had a specific IgE to a penicillin >0.1 kU/L. Only one of these had a positive DPT. CONCLUSION In children, a DPT with penicillins should include at least two full doses. In children with mild hypersensitivity reactions it may be safe to perform DPTs despite a low specific IgE. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04331522.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Josefine Gradman
- Hans Christian Andersen Children's Hospital, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,OPEN, Odense Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kwon JW, Kim YJ, Yang MS, Song WJ, Kim SH, Cho SH, Chang YS. Results of Intradermal Skin Testing with Cefazolin according to a History of Hypersensitivity to Antibiotics. J Korean Med Sci 2019; 34:e319. [PMID: 31880416 PMCID: PMC6935558 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2019] [Accepted: 10/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The relationship between cephalosporin hypersensitivity and a history of β-lactam hypersensitivity is unclear. We evaluated the usefulness of routine intradermal cefazolin skin testing and its relationship with the history of β-lactam hypersensitivity. METHODS The electronic medical records of patients who underwent intradermal cefazolin (0.3 mg/mL) skin testing without negative controls from January 2010 to January 2011 at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital were evaluated. The history of β-lactam hypersensitivity of the patients was taken. Immediate adverse reactions after cefazolin injection were evaluated by searching the electronic medical records for key words and reviewing consultation documents of allergy specialists or dermatologists. The medical records of the patients were reviewed by an allergist. RESULTS There were 13,153 cases of cefazolin skin testing over the 13-month study period. Among the 12,969 cases with negative skin test results, 8 had immediate hypersensitivity related to cefazolin (0.06%). The negative predictive value of cefazolin skin testing alone was 99.94%. The overall positivity rate of cefazolin skin tests was 1.4% (184/13,153). Of the cases with a history of allergy to β-lactams, 15% (6/40) showed a positive cefazolin skin test result compared to only 1.36% (178/13,113) of cases with no such history (P < 0.001) including some false-positive tests. CONCLUSION The results suggest that routine screening involving cefazolin skin testing without negative controls is not useful for all patients, but could be helpful for those with a history of β-lactam hypersensitivity, although a large prospective study is needed to confirm this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Woo Kwon
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Yoon Jeong Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Min Suk Yang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Woo Jung Song
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sae Hoon Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Sang Heon Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yoon Seok Chang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Jimenez-Rodriguez TW, Blanca-Lopez N, Ruano-Zaragoza M, Soriano-Gomis V, Esteban-Rodriguez A, Riera-Sendra G, Palazon-Bru A, Blanca M, Ramos-Rincon JM, Fernandez-Sanchez J. Allergological Study of 565 Elderly Patients Previously Labeled as Allergic to Penicillins. J Asthma Allergy 2019; 12:421-435. [PMID: 31853189 PMCID: PMC6916685 DOI: 10.2147/jaa.s232787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2019] [Accepted: 11/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Elderly people thought to have an allergy to beta-lactams (BLs) may tolerate the drugs in subsequent exposures due to initial false labeling of allergies, the spontaneous loss of sensitivity to BLs over time or age-related decline in sensitization. As a result, they may be treated with less appropriate antibiotics, causing more side effects and entailing increased costs for health systems. The aim of this investigation was to assess whether patients in the third and fourth age with previously confirmed allergies to BLs had lost sensitization and could tolerate these antibiotics. Patients and methods Patients allergic to BLs were divided into group A (aged 60-79 years) and B (aged ≥80 years). Clinical history, skin testing, drug challenge tests (DCT) and evaluation of resensitization were used to classify participants as showing immediate reactions, non-immediate reactions, or tolerance. We compared clinical entities, drugs involved, and final outcome by age group. Results Of 1362 cases evaluated, 565 underwent an allergological study. The skin was the most common organ involved. Anaphylaxis and side chain reactions were more frequent in group A (p<0.01), as were positive DCT. Classical benzylpenicillin determinants (benzylpenicilloyl and/or minor determinant mixture) were more frequent triggers in group B (p< 0.01). Resensitization after challenge occurred in very few participants. Conclusion The risk for allergy to BLs decreases with age and a history of anaphylaxis by BLs is a predictor of positive results in skin tests (ST). Both immunoglobin E (IgE) and T-cell-mediated responses can disappear in elderly people, who can develop tolerance to these antibiotics. These results are of clinical relevance to patients who need to be treated with antibiotics from this family.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teodorikez Wilfox Jimenez-Rodriguez
- Allergy Section, Alicante General University Hospital-ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain.,ARADyAL Spanish Network, Madrid, Spain.,PhD Program in Public Health, Medical and Surgical Sciences, Miguel Hernandez University, Alicante, Spain
| | - Natalia Blanca-Lopez
- ARADyAL Spanish Network, Madrid, Spain.,Allergy Section, Infanta Leonor University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria Ruano-Zaragoza
- Allergy Section, Alicante General University Hospital-ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain.,ARADyAL Spanish Network, Madrid, Spain.,PhD Program in Public Health, Medical and Surgical Sciences, Miguel Hernandez University, Alicante, Spain
| | - Victor Soriano-Gomis
- Allergy Section, Alicante General University Hospital-ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain.,ARADyAL Spanish Network, Madrid, Spain.,Clinical Medicine Department, Miguel Hernandez University, Alicante, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Miguel Blanca
- ARADyAL Spanish Network, Madrid, Spain.,Allergy Section, Infanta Leonor University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose Manuel Ramos-Rincon
- Clinical Medicine Department, Miguel Hernandez University, Alicante, Spain.,Internal Medicine Department, Alicante General University Hospital, Alicante, Spain
| | - Javier Fernandez-Sanchez
- Allergy Section, Alicante General University Hospital-ISABIAL, Alicante, Spain.,ARADyAL Spanish Network, Madrid, Spain.,Clinical Medicine Department, Miguel Hernandez University, Alicante, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Li PH, Siew LQC, Thomas I, Watts TJ, Ue KL, Rutkowski K, Lau CS. Beta-lactam allergy in Chinese patients and factors predicting genuine allergy. World Allergy Organ J 2019; 12:100048. [PMID: 31692961 PMCID: PMC6822230 DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2019.100048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2019] [Revised: 07/02/2019] [Accepted: 07/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Beta-lactams (BL) are the most frequently reported drug allergy, but the vast majority of patients are found not to be genuinely allergic after evaluation. Few studies have investigated the clinical predictors of genuine BL allergy, and the prevalence in hospitalized Chinese patients is unknown. Methods Patients admitted to a tertiary hospital in Hong Kong (HK) were analyzed to identify the prevalence and factors associated with the presence of BL allergy labels among hospitalized Chinese patients. A combined cohort of patients having completed allergy investigation for suspected BL allergies in the United Kingdom (UK) and HK were analyzed to identify predictors of genuine allergy. Results The prevalence of BL allergy labels in hospitalized HK Chinese was 5%, which was associated with female gender and concomitant non-BL antibiotic allergy labels. The rate of genuine BL allergy patients referred for suspected allergies in the UK and HK cohort was only 14%. History of anaphylaxis and interval of less than a year since the index reaction were independent clinical predictors of genuine BL allergy. The negative predictive value of penicillin skin testing was 90%, confirming the need for drug provocation testing after negative skin testing. There was a high rate of confirmed piperacillin-tazobactam allergy. Discussion The estimated true prevalence of genuine BL allergy in hospitalized HK Chinese is around 0.5%. This high rate of BL mislabeling highlights the need for comprehensive allergy evaluation and screening. History of anaphylaxis and duration since the index reaction are important predictors of genuine allergy. Piperacillin-tazobactam allergy may pose a unique challenge in this population with a high prevalence of suspected allergies, surging antibiotic resistance, and lack of testing available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Hei Li
- Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.,Department of Allergy, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Iason Thomas
- Department of Allergy, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Timothy J Watts
- Department of Allergy, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kok Loong Ue
- Department of Allergy, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Krzysztof Rutkowski
- Department of Allergy, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Chak-Sing Lau
- Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Affiliation(s)
- Elissa M Abrams
- Department of Pediatrics (Abrams), Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Pediatrics (Abrams), Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Internal Medicine (Khan), Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex.
| | - David A Khan
- Department of Pediatrics (Abrams), Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Pediatrics (Abrams), Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Internal Medicine (Khan), Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abrams E, Netchiporouk E, Miedzybrodzki B, Ben-Shoshan M. Antibiotic Allergy in Children: More than Just a Label. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2019; 180:103-112. [DOI: 10.1159/000501518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2019] [Accepted: 06/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
32
|
Amo G, Martí M, García-Menaya JM, Cordobés C, Cornejo-García JA, Blanca-López N, Canto G, Doña I, Blanca M, Torres MJ, Agúndez JAG, García-Martín E. Identification of Novel Biomarkers for Drug Hypersensitivity After Sequencing of the Promoter Area in 16 Genes of the Vitamin D Pathway and the High-Affinity IgE Receptor. Front Genet 2019; 10:582. [PMID: 31293618 PMCID: PMC6603231 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2018] [Accepted: 06/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The prevalence of allergic diseases and drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) during recent years is increasing. Both, allergic diseases and DHRs seem to be related to an interplay between environmental factors and genetic susceptibility. In recent years, a large effort in the elucidation of the genetic mechanisms involved in these disorders has been made, mostly based on case-control studies, and typically focusing on isolated SNPs. These studies provide a limited amount of information, which now can be greatly expanded by the complete coverage that Next Generation Sequencing techniques offer. In this study, we analyzed the promoters of sixteen genes related to the Vitamin D pathway and the high-affinity IgE receptor, including FCER1A, MS4A2, FCER1G, VDR, GC, CYP2R1, CYP27A1, CYP27B1, CYP24A1, RXRA, RXRB, RXRG, IL4, IL4R, IL13, and IL13RA1. The study group was composed of patients with allergic rhinitis plus asthma (AR+A), patients with hypersensitivity to beta-lactams (BLs), to NSAIDs including selective hypersensitivity (SH) and cross-reactivity (CR), and healthy controls without antecedents of atopy or adverse drug reactions. We identified 148 gene variations, 43 of which were novel. Multinomial analyses revealed that three SNPs corresponding to the genes FCER1G (rs36233990 and rs2070901), and GC (rs3733359), displayed significant associations and, therefore, were selected for a combined dataset study in a cohort of 2,476 individuals. The strongest association was found with the promoter FCER1G rs36233990 SNP that alters a transcription factor binding site. This SNP was over-represented among AR+A patients and among patients with IgE-mediated diseases, as compared with control individuals or with the rest of patients in this study. Classification models based on the above-mentioned SNPs were able to predict correct clinical group allocations in patients with DHRs, and patients with IgE-mediated DHRs. Our findings reveal gene promoter SNPs that are significant predictors of drug hypersensitivity, thus reinforcing the hypothesis of a genetic predisposition for these diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma Amo
- University Institute of Molecular Pathology Biomarkers, UEx, Cáceres, Spain.,ARADyAL Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Cáceres, Spain
| | - Manuel Martí
- University Institute of Molecular Pathology Biomarkers, UEx, Cáceres, Spain.,ARADyAL Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Cáceres, Spain
| | - Jesús M García-Menaya
- Allergy Service, Badajoz University Hospital, Badajoz, Spain.,ARADyAL Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Badajoz, Spain
| | - Concepción Cordobés
- Allergy Service, Mérida Hospital, Badajoz, Spain.,ARADyAL Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Cáceres, Spain
| | - José A Cornejo-García
- Research Laboratory, IBIMA, Regional University Hospital of Málaga, UMA, Málaga, Spain.,ARADyAL Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Cáceres, Spain
| | - Natalia Blanca-López
- Allergy Service, Infanta Leonor University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.,ARADyAL Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gabriela Canto
- Allergy Service, Infanta Leonor University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.,ARADyAL Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Inmaculada Doña
- Allergy Unit, IBIMA, Regional University Hospital of Málaga, UMA, Málaga, Spain.,ARADyAL Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Málaga, Spain
| | - Miguel Blanca
- Allergy Service, Infanta Leonor University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.,ARADyAL Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - María José Torres
- Allergy Unit, IBIMA, Regional University Hospital of Málaga, UMA, Málaga, Spain.,ARADyAL Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Málaga, Spain
| | - José A G Agúndez
- University Institute of Molecular Pathology Biomarkers, UEx, Cáceres, Spain.,ARADyAL Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Cáceres, Spain
| | - Elena García-Martín
- University Institute of Molecular Pathology Biomarkers, UEx, Cáceres, Spain.,ARADyAL Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Cáceres, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Cloitre A, Duval X, Tubiana S, Giraud P, Veyrac G, Nosbaum A, Gouraud A, Mahé J, Lesclous P. Antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of infective endocarditis for dental procedures is not associated with fatal adverse drug reactions in France. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2019; 24:e296-e304. [PMID: 31011140 PMCID: PMC6530950 DOI: 10.4317/medoral.22818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2018] [Accepted: 02/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background One of the major reasons to stop antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) to prevent infective endocarditis (IE) in the United Kingdom but not in the rest of the world was that it would result in more deaths from fatal adverse drug reactions (ADRs) than the number of IE deaths. The main aim of this study was to quantify and describe the ADRs with amoxicillin or clindamycin for IE AP. The second aim was to infer a crude incidence of anaphylaxis associated with amoxicillin for IE AP. Material and Methods The Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) was used to group ADRs for IE AP using the broad Standardized MedDRA Queries “Anaphylactic reaction, Amoxicillin, Clindamycin, Clostridium Difficile infection” to the French Pharmacovigilance Database System. From this first-line collection, we selected all cases occurring for IE AP and ultimately, the cases for IE AP for a dental procedure. Then, each case was analyzed. Results Of 11639 first-line recorded ADRs, 100 were for IE AP but no fatal anaphylaxis to amoxicillin or clindamycin and no C. difficile infection associated with clindamycin were identified. Only 17 cases of anaphylaxis to amoxicillin related to dental procedures were highlighted. The estimation of the crude incidence rate of anaphylaxis associated with amoxicillin for IE AP for invasive dental procedure was 1/57 000 (95% CI 0.2-0.6). Conclusions Fatal or severe ADRs with amoxicillin or clindamycin is not a rational argument to stop IE AP before invasive dental procedures. Key words:Infective endocarditis, antibiotic prophylaxis, anaphylaxis, adverse drug reaction, amoxicillin, clindamycin, pharmacovigilance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Cloitre
- Faculty of Dentistry, 1 place Alexis Ricordeau, 44042 Nantes, France,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Calamelli E, Caffarelli C, Franceschini F, Saretta F, Cardinale F, Bernardini R, Liotti L, Mori F, Crisafulli G, Caimmi S, Bottau P. A practical management of children with antibiotic allergy. ACTA BIO-MEDICA : ATENEI PARMENSIS 2019; 90:11-19. [PMID: 30830057 PMCID: PMC6502179 DOI: 10.23750/abm.v90i3-s.8157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2019] [Accepted: 02/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
About 10% of the parents reported that their children are allergic to one drug and the betalactam antibiotics are the most frequently suspected. Even if most of the adverse events following antibiotic prescriptions to children are considered allergic, after a full allergy work-up only a few of the suspected reactions are confirmed. For this reason, many children are incorrectly labelled as "allergic" and this represents an important challenge for the choice of the antibiotic therapy in these "labelled" children, who are frequently improperly deprived of narrow-spectrum antibiotics because considered as allergic. When an allergic reaction is suspected a precise diagnosis and a choice of a safe and effective alternative is essential for the future antibiotic option. In the light of this, the main aim of this paper is to try to provide a practical approach to managing the individuals who have reported adverse reactions to antibiotics.
Collapse
|
35
|
Blumenthal KG, Peter JG, Trubiano JA, Phillips EJ. Antibiotic allergy. Lancet 2019; 393:183-198. [PMID: 30558872 PMCID: PMC6563335 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32218-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 326] [Impact Index Per Article: 65.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2018] [Revised: 08/25/2018] [Accepted: 09/04/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Antibiotics are the commonest cause of life-threatening immune-mediated drug reactions that are considered off-target, including anaphylaxis, and organ-specific and severe cutaneous adverse reactions. However, many antibiotic reactions documented as allergies were unknown or not remembered by the patient, cutaneous reactions unrelated to drug hypersensitivity, drug-infection interactions, or drug intolerances. Although such reactions pose negligible risk to patients, they currently represent a global threat to public health. Antibiotic allergy labels result in displacement of first-line therapies for antibiotic prophylaxis and treatment. A penicillin allergy label, in particular, is associated with increased use of broad-spectrum and non-β-lactam antibiotics, which results in increased adverse events and antibiotic resistance. Most patients labelled as allergic to penicillins are not allergic when appropriately stratified for risk, tested, and re-challenged. Given the public health importance of penicillin allergy, this Review provides a global update on antibiotic allergy epidemiology, classification, mechanisms, and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly G Blumenthal
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jonny G Peter
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; Allergy and Immunology Unit, University of Cape Town Lung Institute, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Jason A Trubiano
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The National Centre for Infections in Cancer, Peter McCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Elizabeth J Phillips
- Institute for Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia; Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Vila L, Garcia V, Martinez Azcona O, Pineiro L, Meijide A, Balboa V. Mild to moderate hypersensitivity reactions to beta-lactams in children: a single-centre retrospective review. BMJ Paediatr Open 2019; 3:e000435. [PMID: 31206079 PMCID: PMC6542429 DOI: 10.1136/bmjpo-2019-000435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2019] [Revised: 03/08/2019] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Beta-lactam (BL) antibiotics are the most reported drugs in hypersensitivity reactions in children. More than 90% of these children tolerate the suspected drug after diagnostic work-up. Skin tests (STs) show low sensitivity. Our aim was to assess the performance of drug provocation tests (DPTs) without previous ST in mild and moderate delayed reactions and to propose a new DPT protocol. DESIGN OF THE STUDY Charts from 213 children under 15 years of age referred for suspected BL allergy from 2011 to 1013 were reviewed. Prick, intradermal and patch tests were performed with major determinant penicilloyl-polylysine, minor determinant mixture, amoxicillin (AMX), cefuroxime, penicillin G and AMX-clavulamate. Children with negative skin tests underwent DPT. After an initial full dose of antibiotic, DPT was carried on for 3 days at home in patients reacting within the first 3 days of treatment. If the reaction took place from day 4 on of treatment, patients took the antibiotic for 5 days. RESULTS We included 108 girls and 105 boys. Mean age at the time of reaction was 3.66±3.06 years. 195 patients (91.5%) reacted to one BL. 154 reactions (67.2%) were non-immediate. Mild to moderate skin manifestations were most frequently reported. AMX-clavulanate was the most frequently involved (63.4%). DPT confirmed the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity in 17 (7.3%) cases. These 17 patients had negative ST. CONCLUSION In mild and moderate cases of BL hypersensitivity, diagnosis can be performed by DPT without previous ST.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leticia Vila
- Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruna, A Coruna, Spain
| | - Vanesa Garcia
- Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruna, A Coruna, Spain
| | | | - Loreley Pineiro
- Pediatrics, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruna, A Coruna, Spain
| | - Angela Meijide
- Allergy, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruna, A Coruna, Spain
| | - Vanesa Balboa
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruna, A Coruna, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Mota I, Gaspar Â, Morais-Almeida M. Perioperative Anaphylaxis Including Kounis Syndrome due to Selective Cefazolin Allergy. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2018; 177:269-273. [PMID: 29913447 DOI: 10.1159/000490182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2018] [Accepted: 05/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perioperative use of cefazolin has been associated with severe allergic reactions, and patients are usually labelled as allergic to penicillin afterwards. The aim of our study was to describe a group of patients with immediate reactions to cefazolin, with proven selective hypersensitivity reactions. METHODS Systematic review of all patients followed at our drug centre with cefazolin-related reactions, between January 2012 and December 2016. All patients were investigated according to the European Network for Drug Allergy (ENDA) recommendations through skin testing (major and minor penicillin determinants, penicillin, amoxicillin, cefazolin, cefuroxime and ceftriaxone) and oral challenges tests. RESULTS We included 7 patients (median age 40 years) with perioperative anaphylactic reactions immediately after cefazolin injection, 4 with hypotension and 1 with Kounis syndrome (KS) type I. The presence of a selective IgE-mediated hypersensitivity through positive skin tests to cefazoline has been proven in all patients. Two patients experienced systemic reactions during skin testing. All patients were successfully challenged with amoxicillin, and they tolerated cefuroxime. CONCLUSIONS Cefazolin can be responsible for immediate severe allergic reactions in perioperative setting, including KS. Allergological workup is essential for an accurate diagnosis and to explore cross-reactivity between cefazolin and other beta-lactams. Our experience confirmed that patients with IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions to cefazolin can tolerate other beta-lactams. This selective pattern of clinical reactivity may be explained by its particular chemical structure, whose R1 side-chain is different from other beta-lactams.
Collapse
|
38
|
Norton AE, Konvinse K, Phillips EJ, Broyles AD. Antibiotic Allergy in Pediatrics. Pediatrics 2018; 141:peds.2017-2497. [PMID: 29700201 PMCID: PMC5914499 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2017-2497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The overlabeling of pediatric antibiotic allergy represents a huge burden in society. Given that up to 10% of the US population is labeled as penicillin allergic, it can be estimated that at least 5 million children in this country are labeled with penicillin allergy. We now understand that most of the cutaneous symptoms that are interpreted as drug allergy are likely viral induced or due to a drug-virus interaction, and they usually do not represent a long-lasting, drug-specific, adaptive immune response to the antibiotic that a child received. Because most antibiotic allergy labels acquired in childhood are carried into adulthood, the overlabeling of antibiotic allergy is a liability that leads to unnecessary long-term health care risks, costs, and antibiotic resistance. Fortunately, awareness of this growing burden is increasing and leading to more emphasis on antibiotic allergy delabeling strategies in the adult population. There is growing literature that is used to support the safe and efficacious use of tools such as skin testing and drug challenge to evaluate and manage children with antibiotic allergy labels. In addition, there is an increasing understanding of antibiotic reactivity within classes and side-chain reactions. In summary, a better overall understanding of the current tools available for the diagnosis and management of adverse drug reactions is likely to change how pediatric primary care providers evaluate and treat patients with such diagnoses and prevent the unnecessary avoidance of antibiotics, particularly penicillins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Eaddy Norton
- Division of Allergy, Immunology and Pulmonology, Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, and
| | - Katherine Konvinse
- Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Elizabeth J. Phillips
- Division of Allergy, Immunology and Pulmonology, Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, and,John A. Oates Institute for Experimental Therapeutics and Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee;,Division of Infectious Disease, Departments of Medicine and,Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee;,Institute for Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia; and
| | - Ana Dioun Broyles
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Tannert LK, Falkencrone S, Mortz CG, Bindslev-Jensen C, Skov PS. Is a positive intracutaneous test induced by penicillin mediated by histamine? A cutaneous microdialysis study in penicillin-allergic patients. Clin Transl Allergy 2017; 7:40. [PMID: 29177030 PMCID: PMC5692793 DOI: 10.1186/s13601-017-0179-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2017] [Accepted: 11/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Diagnostic workup of penicillin allergy comprises skin testing with penicillins, and patients are deemed allergic if skin test is positive. However, the literature suggests that skin test-positive patients may be challenge-negative, indicating that the skin test may be falsely positive. Objective To investigate real-time histamine release from a positive intracutaneous test induced by penicillin in patients with positive and negative challenges to penicillin. Methods Skin microdialysis was performed in 21 penicillin-allergic patients with positive skin test, 13 non-allergic volunteers serving as negative controls, and 7 grass pollen-allergic patients serving as positive controls. Histamine was measured by microdialysis after skin test with penicillin/grass/NaCl. Penicillin challenge was subsequently performed in 12 of the patients. Results Only 10/21 patients (47.6%) were skin test positive at microdialysis. During microdialysis 13 single intracutaneous tests were positive and histamine was detected in 4/13 occurring in four challenge positive patients. Thirteen/21 patients (61.9%) were deemed allergic to penicillin; eight had positive skin test. Two patients with positive skin test were challenge negative. In grass pollen allergic patients, 7/7 had a positive intracutaneous test to grass and all released histamine in the wheals. All 13 negative controls had negative intracutaneous test to penicillin and no histamine release. Conclusion Histamine was only detected in the minority of positive intracutaneous tests with penicillin in penicillin-allergic patients. Other mediators may be involved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Line K Tannert
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis, Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 15, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
| | | | - Charlotte G Mortz
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis, Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 15, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
| | - Carsten Bindslev-Jensen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis, Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 15, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
| | - Per Stahl Skov
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis, Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 15, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.,Reflab®, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Trubiano JA, Stone CA, Grayson ML, Urbancic K, Slavin MA, Thursky KA, Phillips EJ. The 3 Cs of Antibiotic Allergy-Classification, Cross-Reactivity, and Collaboration. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2017; 5:1532-1542. [PMID: 28843343 PMCID: PMC5681410 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2017] [Revised: 06/08/2017] [Accepted: 06/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Antibiotic allergy labeling is highly prevalent and negatively impacts patient outcomes and antibiotic appropriateness. Reducing the prevalence and burden of antibiotic allergies requires the engagement of key stakeholders such as allergists, immunologists, pharmacists, and infectious diseases physicians. To help address this burden of antibiotic allergy overlabeling, we review 3 key antibiotic allergy domains: (1) antibiotic allergy classification, (2) antibiotic cross-reactivity, and (3) multidisciplinary collaboration. We review the available evidence and research gaps of currently used adverse drug reaction classification systems, antibiotic allergy cross-reactivity, and current and future models of antibiotic allergy care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason A Trubiano
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Improving Cancer Outcomes through Enhanced Infection Services, National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence, The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Cosby A Stone
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn
| | - M Lindsay Grayson
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Karen Urbancic
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Pharmacy, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Monica A Slavin
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Improving Cancer Outcomes through Enhanced Infection Services, National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence, The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Karin A Thursky
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Improving Cancer Outcomes through Enhanced Infection Services, National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence, The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Elizabeth J Phillips
- Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; Institute for Immunology & Infectious Diseases, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia; Department of Medicine, Pathology, Microbiology, Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn; Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University Medical School, Nashville, Tenn
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Romano A, Valluzzi RL, Caruso C, Maggioletti M, Gaeta F. Non-immediate Cutaneous Reactions to Beta-Lactams: Approach to Diagnosis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2017; 17:23. [PMID: 28382604 DOI: 10.1007/s11882-017-0691-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Non-immediate cutaneous reactions (i.e., occurring at least 1 h after the initial drug administration), particularly maculopapular exanthemas and urticarial eruptions, are common during beta-lactam treatments. A T cell-mediated pathogenic mechanism has been demonstrated in some cutaneous reactions, such as maculopapular exanthema, fixed drug eruption, acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, and drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome. In the diagnostic work-up, patch testing is useful, together with delayed-reading intradermal testing. Patch tests are a simple and safe diagnostic tool, which in the case of severe reactions should be used as the first line of investigation. However, patch tests are less sensitive than intradermal tests, which are preferable in subjects with mild reactions. Lymphocyte transformation or activation tests and enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assays can be used as complementary tests. In selected cases of mild or moderate reactions, displaying negative results in the aforesaid allergy tests, a graded challenge with the implicated beta-lactam can be performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonino Romano
- Allergy Unit, Presidio Columbus, Via G. Moscati, 31, 00168, Rome, Italy. .,IRCCS Oasi Maria S.S, Troina, Italy.
| | - Rocco Luigi Valluzzi
- Allergy Unit, Presidio Columbus, Via G. Moscati, 31, 00168, Rome, Italy.,Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy, Pediatric Hospital Bambino Gesù, Rome, Vatican City, Italy
| | - Cristiano Caruso
- Allergy Unit, Presidio Columbus, Via G. Moscati, 31, 00168, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Gaeta
- Allergy Unit, Presidio Columbus, Via G. Moscati, 31, 00168, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Soyer O, Sahiner UM, Sekerel BE. Pro and Contra: Provocation Tests in Drug Hypersensitivity. Int J Mol Sci 2017; 18:ijms18071437. [PMID: 28677662 PMCID: PMC5535928 DOI: 10.3390/ijms18071437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2017] [Revised: 06/24/2017] [Accepted: 06/27/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Drug provocation test (DPT) is the controlled administration of a drug to diagnose immune- or non-immune-mediated drug hypersensitivity and the last step for accurate recognition of drug hypersensitivity reactions when the previous diagnostic evaluations are negative or unavailable. A DPT is performed only if other conventional tests fail to yield conclusive results. In each clinical presentation, "to provoke or not to provoke" a patient should be decided after careful assessment of the risk-benefit ratio. Well-defined benefits of DPT include confirmative exclusion of diagnoses of drug hypersensitivity and provision of safe alternatives. However, disadvantages such as safety, difficulty in interpretations of results, lack of objective biomarkers, risks of resensitization, efficiency in daily practice, and lack of standardized protocols, are poorly debated. This review summarizes the current published research concerning DPT, with particular emphasis on the advantages and disadvantages of DPT in an evidence-based manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ozge Soyer
- Department of Pediatric Allergy Ankara, School of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara 06100, Turkey.
| | - Umit Murat Sahiner
- Department of Pediatric Allergy Ankara, School of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara 06100, Turkey.
| | - Bulent Enis Sekerel
- Department of Pediatric Allergy Ankara, School of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara 06100, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Doña I, Torres MJ, Montañez MI, Fernández TD. In Vitro Diagnostic Testing for Antibiotic Allergy. ALLERGY, ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY RESEARCH 2017; 9:288-298. [PMID: 28497915 PMCID: PMC5446943 DOI: 10.4168/aair.2017.9.4.288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2016] [Revised: 01/18/2017] [Accepted: 02/05/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Allergy to antibiotics is an important worldwide problem, with an estimated prevalence of up to 10% of the population. Reaction patterns for different antibiotics have changed in accordance with consumption trends. Most of the allergic reactions to antibiotics have been reported for betalactams, followed by quinolones and macrolides and, to a lesser extent, to others, such as metronidazole clindamycin and sulfonamides. The diagnostic procedure includes a detailed clinical history, which is not always possible and can be unreliable. This is usually followed by in vivo, skin, and drug provocation tests. These are not recommended for severe, potentially lifethreaten reactions or for drugs that are known to produce a high rate of false positive results. Given the limitations of in vivo tests, in vitro test can be helpful for diagnosis, despite having suboptimal sensitivity. The most highly employed techniques for diagnosing immediate reactions to antibiotics are immunoassays and basophil activation tests, while lymphocyte transformation tests are more commonly used to diagnose non-immediate reactions. In this review, we describe different in vitro techniques employed to diagnose antibiotic allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inmaculada Doña
- Allergy Unit, IBIMA-Regional University Hospital of Malaga-UMA, Málaga, Spain
| | - Maria J Torres
- Allergy Unit, IBIMA-Regional University Hospital of Malaga-UMA, Málaga, Spain.
- Andalusian Center for Nanomedicine and Biotechnology-BIONAND, Málaga, Spain
| | - Maria I Montañez
- Andalusian Center for Nanomedicine and Biotechnology-BIONAND, Málaga, Spain
- Research Laboratory, IBIMA-Regional University Hospital of Malaga-UMA, Málaga, Spain
| | - Tahia D Fernández
- Research Laboratory, IBIMA-Regional University Hospital of Malaga-UMA, Málaga, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Su T, Broekhuizen BDL, Verheij TJM, Rockmann H. The impact of penicillin allergy labels on antibiotic and health care use in primary care: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Transl Allergy 2017; 7:18. [PMID: 28593040 PMCID: PMC5461748 DOI: 10.1186/s13601-017-0154-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2017] [Accepted: 05/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Suspected penicillin allergy (Pen-A) is often not verified by diagnostic testing. In third line penicillin allergy labels were associated with prescription of broad spectrum antibiotics, hospital stay duration and readmission. OBJECTIVE Assess the impact of Pen-A labels on antibiotic and health care use in primary care. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted in primary care in the Utrecht area, the Netherlands. All patients registered with a penicillin allergy on 31 December 2013 were selected from the General Practitioner Network database. Each patient with a Pen-A label was matched for age, gender, follow-up period with three patients without Pen-A label. Risk (OR) of receiving a reserve and second choice antibiotic, number and type of antibiotics prescribed during follow-up and number of GP contacts were compared between the two cohorts. RESULTS Of 196,440 patients, 1254 patients (0.6%) with a Pen-A label were identified and matched with 3756 patients without Pen-A label. Pen-A labels resulted in higher risk of receiving ≥1 antibiotic prescription per year (OR 2.56, 95% CI 2.05-3.20), ≥1 s choice antibiotic prescription per year (OR 2.21 95% CI 1.11-4.40), and ≥4 GP contacts per year (OR 1.71 95% CI 1.46-2.00). The chance of receiving tetracyclins (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.29-3.89), macrolides/lincosamides/streptogamins (OR 8.69, 95% CI 4.26-17.73) and quinolones (OR 2.59, 95% CI 1.22-5.48) was higher in Pen-A patients. CONCLUSIONS In primary health care Pen-A labels are associated with increased antibiotic use, including second choice antibiotics, and more health care use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanly Su
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Berna D L Broekhuizen
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Theo J M Verheij
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Heike Rockmann
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, G02.129, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Torres MJ, Romano A, Celik G, Demoly P, Khan DA, Macy E, Park M, Blumenthal K, Aberer W, Castells M, Barbaud A, Mayorga C, Bonadonna P. Approach to the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions: similarities and differences between Europe and North America. Clin Transl Allergy 2017; 7:7. [PMID: 28293415 PMCID: PMC5347172 DOI: 10.1186/s13601-017-0144-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2017] [Accepted: 02/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) affect an unknown proportion of the general population, and are an important public health problem due to their potential to cause life-threatening anaphylaxis and rare severe cutaneous allergic reactions. DHR evaluations are frequently needed in both ambulatory and hospital settings and have a complex diagnosis that requires a detailed clinical history and other tests that may include in vitro tests and in vivo procedures such as skin tests and drug provocation tests. Although over the years both European and U.S. experts have published statements on general procedures for evaluating DHRs, a substantial discordance in their daily management exists. In this review, we highlight both the differences and the similarities between the European and U.S. perspectives. While a general consensus exists on the importance of skin tests for evaluating DHRs, concordance between Americans and Europeans exists solely regarding their use in immediate reactions and the fact that a confirmation of a presumptive diagnosis by drug provocation tests is often the only reliable way to establish a diagnosis. Finally, great heterogeneity exists in the application of in vitro tests, which require further study to be well validated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Torres
- Allergy Unit, National Network ARADyAL, IBIMA-Regional University Hospital of Malaga-UMA (Pavilion C), Plaza del Hospital Civil, 29009 Malaga, Spain.,BIONAND-Andalusian Centre for Nanomedicine and Biotechnology, Malaga, Spain
| | - A Romano
- Allergy Unit, Presidio Columbus, Rome, Italy.,IRCCS Oasi Maria S.S., Troina, Italy
| | - G Celik
- Department of Chest Diseases, Division of Immunology and Allergy, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - P Demoly
- Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, University Hospital of Montpellier and Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Paris 06, UMR-S 1136, IPLESP, Equipe EPAR, 75013 Paris, France
| | - D A Khan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX USA
| | - E Macy
- Kaiser Permanente Health Care Program, San Diego, CA USA
| | - M Park
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Division of Allergic Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
| | - K Blumenthal
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - W Aberer
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - M Castells
- Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MSA USA
| | - A Barbaud
- Sorbonne Universities, UPMC Univ Paris 06, Dermatology and Allergology Department, Tenon Hospital (AP-HP), 4 rue de la chine, 75020 Paris, France
| | - C Mayorga
- Allergy Unit, IBIMA-Regional University Hospital of Malaga-UMA (Pavilion C), Plaza del Hospital Civil, 29009 Malaga, Spain
| | - P Bonadonna
- Allergy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Intergrata of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
Drug allergy is defined as an adverse drug reaction with an established immunological mechanism. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence published clinical guidelines on drug allergy in 2014 and quality standards in 2015. The intention of this article is to highlight indications for referral to specialists for management of drug allergy. Accurate diagnosis of drug allergy is critical of course for patient safety, but also for better use of the drugs that we have available and to reduce unnecessary avoidance of drugs. However, there are significant limitations in terms of resource availability and also in terms of testing. There is a careful balance here in that drug allergy is very common and clearly there is neither indication nor sufficient resource in the NHS for all patients with drug allergy to be reviewed by a specialist. It is, therefore, important to highlight to general physicians and physicians of other specialties, those patients who do require referral for specialist review.
Collapse
|
47
|
Trubiano JA, Worth LJ, Urbancic K, Brown TM, Paterson DL, Lucas M, Phillips E. Return to sender: the need to re-address patient antibiotic allergy labels in Australia and New Zealand. Intern Med J 2016; 46:1311-1317. [PMID: 27527526 PMCID: PMC5096978 DOI: 10.1111/imj.13221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2016] [Revised: 08/04/2016] [Accepted: 08/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Antibiotic allergies are frequently reported and have significant impacts upon appropriate prescribing and clinical outcomes. We surveyed infectious diseases physicians, allergists, clinical immunologists and hospital pharmacists to evaluate antibiotic allergy knowledge and service delivery in Australia and New Zealand. METHODS An online multi-choice questionnaire was developed and endorsed by representatives of the Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy (ASCIA) and the Australasian Society of Infectious Diseases (ASID). The 37-item survey was distributed in April 2015 to members of ASCIA, ASID, the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia and the Royal Australasian College of Physicians. RESULTS Of 277 respondents, 94% currently use or would utilise antibiotic allergy testing (AAT) and reported seeing up to 10 patients/week labelled as antibiotic-allergic. Forty-two per cent were not aware of or did not have AAT available. Most felt that AAT would aid antibiotic selection, antibiotic appropriateness and antimicrobial stewardship (79, 69 and 61% respectively). Patients with the histories of immediate hypersensitivity were more likely to be referred than those with delayed hypersensitivities (76 vs 41%, P = 0.0001). Lack of specialist physicians (20%) and personal experience (17%) were barriers to service delivery. A multidisciplinary approach was a preferred AAT model (53%). Knowledge gaps were identified, with the majority overestimating rates of penicillin/cephalosporin (78%), penicillin/carbapenem (57%) and penicillin/monobactam (39%) cross-reactivity. CONCLUSIONS A high burden of antibiotic allergy labelling and demand for AAT is complicated by a relative lack availability or awareness of AAT services in Australia and New Zealand. Antibiotic allergy education and deployment of AAT, accessible to community and hospital-based clinicians, may improve clinical decisions and reduce antibiotic allergy impacts. A collaborative approach involving infectious diseases physicians, pharmacists and allergists/immunologists is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Trubiano
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - L J Worth
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - K Urbancic
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Pharmacy, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - T M Brown
- Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - D L Paterson
- Centre for Clinical Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - M Lucas
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Pathwest Laboratory Medicine, Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - E Phillips
- Institute for Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Böhm R, Cascorbi I. Pharmacogenetics and Predictive Testing of Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions. Front Pharmacol 2016; 7:396. [PMID: 27818635 PMCID: PMC5073094 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2016] [Accepted: 10/07/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Adverse drug reactions adverse drug reaction (ADR) occur in approximately 17% of patients. Avoiding ADR is thus mandatory from both an ethical and an economic point of view. Whereas, pharmacogenetics changes of the pharmacokinetics may contribute to the explanation of some type A reactions, strong relationships of genetic markers has also been shown for drug hypersensitivity belonging to type B reactions. We present the classifications of ADR, discuss genetic influences and focus on delayed-onset hypersensitivity reactions, i.e., drug-induced liver injury, drug-induced agranulocytosis, and severe cutaneous ADR. A guidance how to read and interpret the contingency table is provided as well as an algorithm whether and how a test for a pharmacogenetic biomarker should be conducted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruwen Böhm
- Institute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Kiel, Germany
| | - Ingolf Cascorbi
- Institute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Kowalski ML, Ansotegui I, Aberer W, Al-Ahmad M, Akdis M, Ballmer-Weber BK, Beyer K, Blanca M, Brown S, Bunnag C, Hulett AC, Castells M, Chng HH, De Blay F, Ebisawa M, Fineman S, Golden DBK, Haahtela T, Kaliner M, Katelaris C, Lee BW, Makowska J, Muller U, Mullol J, Oppenheimer J, Park HS, Parkerson J, Passalacqua G, Pawankar R, Renz H, Rueff F, Sanchez-Borges M, Sastre J, Scadding G, Sicherer S, Tantilipikorn P, Tracy J, van Kempen V, Bohle B, Canonica GW, Caraballo L, Gomez M, Ito K, Jensen-Jarolim E, Larche M, Melioli G, Poulsen LK, Valenta R, Zuberbier T. Risk and safety requirements for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in allergology: World Allergy Organization Statement. World Allergy Organ J 2016; 9:33. [PMID: 27777642 PMCID: PMC5062928 DOI: 10.1186/s40413-016-0122-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2016] [Accepted: 08/19/2016] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
One of the major concerns in the practice of allergy is related to the safety of procedures for the diagnosis and treatment of allergic disease. Management (diagnosis and treatment) of hypersensitivity disorders involves often intentional exposure to potentially allergenic substances (during skin testing), deliberate induction in the office of allergic symptoms to offending compounds (provocation tests) or intentional application of potentially dangerous substances (allergy vaccine) to sensitized patients. These situations may be associated with a significant risk of unwanted, excessive or even dangerous reactions, which in many instances cannot be completely avoided. However, adverse reactions can be minimized or even avoided if a physician is fully aware of potential risk and is prepared to appropriately handle the situation. Information on the risk of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in allergic diseases has been accumulated in the medical literature for decades; however, except for allergen specific immunotherapy, it has never been presented in a systematic fashion. Up to now no single document addressed the risk of the most commonly used medical procedures in the allergy office nor attempted to present general requirements necessary to assure the safety of these procedures. Following review of available literature a group of allergy experts within the World Allergy Organization (WAO), representing various continents and areas of allergy expertise, presents this report on risk associated with diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in allergology and proposes a consensus on safety requirements for performing procedures in allergy offices. Optimal safety measures including appropriate location, type and required time of supervision, availability of safety equipment, access to specialized emergency services, etc. for various procedures have been recommended. This document should be useful for allergists with already established practices and experience as well as to other specialists taking care of patients with allergies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marek L. Kowalski
- Department of Immunology, Rheumatology & Allergy, Medical University of Lodz, 251 Pomorska Str, 92-213 Lodz, Poland
| | - Ignacio Ansotegui
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, Hospital Quiron Bizkaia, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Werner Aberer
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Mona Al-Ahmad
- Microbiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Mubeccel Akdis
- Swiss institute of Allergy & Asthma research, Davos, Switzerland
| | - Barbara K. Ballmer-Weber
- Allergy Unit, Dermatology Clinic, University Hospital Zürich, University Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Kirsten Beyer
- Kirsten Beyer, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Klinik für Pädiatrie m.S. Pneumologie und Immunologie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Miguel Blanca
- Hospital Reg. Univ. Carlos Haya, Allergy Serv, Malaga, Spain
| | - Simon Brown
- Royal Perth Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Perth, WA Australia
| | - Chaweewan Bunnag
- Department of Otolaryngology, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Mariana Castells
- Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Hiok Hee Chng
- Department of Rheumatology, Allergy & Immunology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Frederic De Blay
- Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Chest Diseases Department, Strasbourg, France
| | - Motohiro Ebisawa
- Department of Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Allergology and Rheumatology, Sagamihara National Hospital, Sagamihara, Kanagawa Japan
| | - Stanley Fineman
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta Allergy & Asthma, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Tari Haahtela
- Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | | | - Bee Wah Lee
- Department of Paediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Joanna Makowska
- CSK, Department of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Lodz, Poland
| | | | - Joaquim Mullol
- Rhinology Unit & Smell Clinic, ENT Department, Hospital Clínic, Clinical & Experimental Respiratory Immunoallergy, IDIBAPS, and CIBERES, Barcelona, Spain
| | - John Oppenheimer
- UMDNJ – Rutgers Medical School, c/o Pulmonary and Allergy Associates, Summit, New Jersey, USA
| | - Hae-Sim Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea
| | | | - Giovanni Passalacqua
- Allergy and Respiratory Diseases, IRCCS San Martino Hospital IST, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Ruby Pawankar
- Department of Pediatrics, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Harald Renz
- Universitatsklinikum GI & MR GmbH, Institut fur Laboratoriumsmedizin & Path, Standort Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Franziska Rueff
- Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat, Klinik & Poliklinik fur Dermatologie & Allergologie, Munchen, Germany
| | - Mario Sanchez-Borges
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Centro Medico-Docente La Trinidadad, Caracas, Venezuela
| | - Joaquin Sastre
- Allergy Department, Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Institute Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Scott Sicherer
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY USA
| | | | | | - Vera van Kempen
- Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine, German Social Accident Insurance, Ruhr-University Bochum (IPA), Bochum, Germany
| | - Barbara Bohle
- Division of Experimental Allergology, Department of Pathophysiology, Allergy Research Center of Pathophysiology, Infectiology & Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - G Walter Canonica
- Allergy & Respiratory Disease Clinic, DIMI – Department Int Med, University of Genoa, IRCCS AOU, San Martino – IST, Genoa, Italy
| | - Luis Caraballo
- Immunology Department, Universidad De Cartagena, Cartagena, Colombia
| | | | - Komei Ito
- Department of Allergy, Aichi Children’s Health and Medical Center, Aichi, Japan
| | - Erika Jensen-Jarolim
- Messerli Research Institute, Medical University Vienna, University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mark Larche
- Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | | | - Lars K. Poulsen
- Gentofte University Hospital, Lab for Allergology, Allergy Clinic, Hellerup, Denmark
| | | | - Torsten Zuberbier
- Campus Charite Mitte, Klinik fur Dermatologie & Allergologie, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Ariza A, Mayorga C, Salas M, Doña I, Martín-Serrano Á, Pérez-Inestrosa E, Pérez-Sala D, Guzmán AE, Montañez MI, Torres MJ. The influence of the carrier molecule on amoxicillin recognition by specific IgE in patients with immediate hypersensitivity reactions to betalactams. Sci Rep 2016; 6:35113. [PMID: 27731424 PMCID: PMC5059705 DOI: 10.1038/srep35113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2016] [Accepted: 09/23/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The optimal recognition of penicillin determinants, including amoxicillin (AX), by specific IgE antibodies is widely believed to require covalent binding to a carrier molecule. The nature of the carrier and its contribution to the antigenic determinant is not well known. Here we aimed to evaluate the specific-IgE recognition of different AX-derived structures. We studied patients with immediate hypersensitivity reactions to AX, classified as selective or cross-reactors to penicillins. Competitive immunoassays were performed using AX itself, amoxicilloic acid, AX bound to butylamine (AXO-BA) or to human serum albumin (AXO-HSA) in the fluid phase, as inhibitors, and amoxicilloyl-poli-L-lysine (AXO-PLL) in the solid-phase. Two distinct patterns of AX recognition by IgE were found: Group A showed a higher recognition of AX itself and AX-modified components of low molecular weights, whilst Group B showed similar recognition of both unconjugated and conjugated AX. Amoxicilloic acid was poorly recognized in both groups, which reinforces the need for AX conjugation to a carrier for optimal recognition. Remarkably, IgE recognition in Group A (selective responders to AX) is influenced by the mode of binding and/or the nature of the carrier; whereas IgE in Group B (cross-responders to penicillins) recognizes AX independently of the nature of the carrier.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriana Ariza
- Research Laboratory, IBIMA–Regional University Hospital of Malaga–UMA, Málaga, Spain
| | - Cristobalina Mayorga
- Research Laboratory, IBIMA–Regional University Hospital of Malaga–UMA, Málaga, Spain
- Allergy Unit, IBIMA–Regional University Hospital of Malaga–UMA, Málaga, Spain
- Andalusian Center for Nanomedicine and Biotechnology - BIONAND, Málaga, Spain
| | - María Salas
- Allergy Unit, IBIMA–Regional University Hospital of Malaga–UMA, Málaga, Spain
| | - Inmaculada Doña
- Allergy Unit, IBIMA–Regional University Hospital of Malaga–UMA, Málaga, Spain
| | - Ángela Martín-Serrano
- Research Laboratory, IBIMA–Regional University Hospital of Malaga–UMA, Málaga, Spain
- Andalusian Center for Nanomedicine and Biotechnology - BIONAND, Málaga, Spain
| | - Ezequiel Pérez-Inestrosa
- Andalusian Center for Nanomedicine and Biotechnology - BIONAND, Málaga, Spain
- Department of Organic Chemistry, University of Málaga, IBIMA, Málaga, Spain
| | | | - Antonio E. Guzmán
- Pharmacy Unit, Regional University Hospital of Malaga, Málaga, Spain
| | - María I. Montañez
- Research Laboratory, IBIMA–Regional University Hospital of Malaga–UMA, Málaga, Spain
- Andalusian Center for Nanomedicine and Biotechnology - BIONAND, Málaga, Spain
| | - María J. Torres
- Allergy Unit, IBIMA–Regional University Hospital of Malaga–UMA, Málaga, Spain
- Andalusian Center for Nanomedicine and Biotechnology - BIONAND, Málaga, Spain
| |
Collapse
|