Accidental transplantation of a kidney with a cystic renal cell carcinoma following living donation: management and 1 yr follow-up

Management of renal cell carcinoma in transplant kidney: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

After transplantation, approximately 10% of renal cell carcinomas are detected in graft kidneys. These tumors (gRCC) present surgeons with the difficulty of finding a treatment that guarantees both oncological clearance and maintenance of function. We conducted a systematic review and an individual patient data meta-analysis on the oncology, safety and functional outcomes of the available treatments for gRCC.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic search was performed across MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science including any study reporting perioperative, functional and survival outcomes for patients undergoing graft nephrectomy (GN), partial nephrectomy (PN) or thermal ablation (TA) for gRCC. Quade's ANCOVA, Spearman Rho and Pearson χ², Kaplan-Meier, Log-rank and Standard Cox regression and other tests were used to compare treatments. Studies' quality was evaluated using a modified version of Newcastle Ottawa Scale.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

A number of 29 studies (357 patients) were included. No differences between TA and PN were found in terms of safety, functional and oncological outcomes for T1a gRCCs. When applied to pT1b gRCC, PN showed no difference in complications, progression or cancer-specific deaths compared to smaller lesions; PN validity for pT2 gRCCs should be considered unverified due to lack of sufficient evidence. The efficacy and safety of PN or TA for multiple gRCC remain controversial. In case of non-functioning, large (T≥2), complicated or metastatic gRCCs, GN appears to be the most reasonable choice. Quality of evidence ranged from very low to moderate. Studies with large cohorts and longer follow-up are still needed to clarify oncological and functional differences.

CONCLUSIONS

PN and TA might be offered as a nephron-sparing treatment in patients with T1a gRCC. There is no significant difference between these options and GN in terms of oncological outcomes and complications. PN and TA offer similar functional outcomes and graft preservation. PN for T1b gRCC seems feasible and safe, but its validity should be considered unverified.

Image-Guided Thermal Ablation in De Novo Renal Tumor Arising in Kidney Allograft: 3-Year Follow-Up. A Case Report

De novo tumors in renal allograft recipients are a severe complication during long-term follow-up after transplantation and may require transplantectomy. Herein we present a case of de novo renal tumor arising in the renal allograft, treated with the less invasive image-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with long-term follow-up. A tumor was detected during the routine annual follow-up in a patient with good renal function who underwent renal transplantation in 1989. Computed tomography (CT) showed a mass in the allograft whose shape, vascularization, and density suggested the presence of a solid, malignant mass, located in the upper renal pole, that measured 17 mm. CT-guided RFA was performed successfully, and the outcome was verified by an immediate control CT after the intervention. No residual pathologic tissue, major bleeding, or damage to the adjacent parenchyma was evidenced. The patient was discharged with stable renal function. CT scan and ultrasound were performed 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months after RFA. No signs of change in renal function, recurrence, neovascularization, or damage to the adjacent microcirculation were observed during the 3-year follow-up. In conclusion, percutaneous RFA of small renal tumors occurring in renal allografts can be considered a function-sparing, safe, and effective therapeutic option when difficult surgical removal may be anticipated. Our experience also supports the need for yearly renal allograft ultrasound follow-up for early identification of small neoplasm than can be treated less invasively.

Kidney Transplantation From Donors with Resectable Renal Cell Carcinoma: Two Case Reports

BACKGROUND

The existence of renal cell cancer (RCC) in a donated kidney may cause some confusion for clinicians. We aim to present our clinical experiences with 2 recipients who received an RCC-containing kidney from their living related donors.

METHODS

Two male patients received a kidney containing resectable size RCC from their living related donors. The recipients were discharged with well-functioning kidneys and currently are being monitored on standard follow-up protocols, and there is no evidence of RCC in their grafts.

RESULTS

The kidneys with resectable sizes of renal cell carcinoma were transplanted to the recipients after nephron-sparing surgery, with no sign of recurrent RCC in the 12-month follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

In the era of transplantation, the shortage of organ sources is the major barrier for the provision of organs to recipients. To enhance the graft donation pool, kidneys with resectable size RCC might be used in providing grafts to patients with end-stage kidney disease.

Experiences of renal transplants from donors with renal cell carcinoma after ex vivo partial nephrectomy

Purpose

Routine evaluation of kidney donors occasionally reveals an incidental renal mass with an otherwise satisfactory kidney function. The use of such a kidney with an enhancing mass for transplantation is a matter of debate owing to a possible risk of transmission of donor malignancies. We report our experience of kidney transplants from donors with renal cell carcinoma, after ex vivo resection of the renal mass.

Methods

Two women aged 44 and 56 years were diagnosed with enhancing renal masses measuring 0.9 cm and 0.7 cm, respectively, during donor evaluation for kidney transplantation. Both patients and their families were informed of a potential risk of recurrent renal cell carcinoma following transplantation.

Results

Renal function test results of both donors satisfied the living donor selection criteria. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy was performed with ex vivo resection of renal masses on the bench table. Immediate pathological analysis revealed a renal cell carcinoma with a margin of normal renal parenchyma before transplantation. Regimens based on mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, which are known for their antitumoral properties, were used for immunosuppression in both recipients. None of the recipients showed recurrence or metastasis during the follow-up period, which was longer than 3 years after transplantation.

Conclusion

In light of the ongoing shortage of kidney donors, kidneys with small renal cell carcinoma could be considered for transplantation after appropriate removal of the lesion, with a very low risk of recurrent disease.

Renal Cancer in Recipients of Kidney Transplant

The aim of our study is to determine characteristics and outcomes of kidney cancer in renal transplant recipients. MEDLINE® database was searched in June 2015 to identify cases of kidney cancer in renal transplant recipients. We include also a new case. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. Forty-eight (48) recipients reported in 25 papers met the eligibility criteria. The median age was 47 years (range 9-66); 27% were females. Chronic glomerulonephritis, cystic kidney disease and hypertension were common indications for renal transplant. Among donors 24% were females and the median age was 52.5 years (17-73); 62% of kidney cancers were donor-derived. The median interval between transplant and cancer diagnosis was shorter for cancer of recipient versus donor origin (150 vs. 210 days). Clear cell carcinoma was diagnosed in 17%. 25% had metastasis at diagnosis. Kidney explantation or excision was done in 90% and 84% of cases with and without metastasis respectively. The median survival was 72 months. Actuarial 1-year and 5-year survival rates were 73.4% and 55.1% respectively. Among the recipients from 7 donors who subsequently developed malignancy, 57% were dead within a year. Kidney transplant recipients have a small risk of kidney cancer, which affects younger patients and occurs within a year of transplant, likely due to immunosuppression. Whether the use of older donors may increase the likelihood needs further investigation. The presence of metastasis, explantation or excision of affected kidney and development of cancer in donors predict outcomes. The results may guide patient education and informed decision-making.

Donor transmitted and de novo cancer after liver transplantation

Cancers in solid organ recipients may be classified as donor transmitted, donor derived, de novo or recurrent. The risk of donor-transmitted cancer is very low and can be reduced by careful screening of the donor but cannot be abolished and, in the United Kingdom series is less than 0.03%. For donors with a known history of cancer, the risks will depend on the nature of the cancer, the interventions given and the interval between diagnosis and organ donation. The risks of cancer transmission must be balanced against the risks of death awaiting a new graft and strict adherence to current guidelines may result increased patient death. Organs from selected patients, even with high-grade central nervous system (CNS) malignancy and after a shunt, can, in some circumstances, be considered. Of potential donors with non-CNS cancers, whether organs may be safely used again depends on the nature of the cancer, the treatment and interval. Data are scarce about the most appropriate treatment when donor transmitted cancer is diagnosed: sometimes substitution of agents and reduction of the immunosuppressive load may be adequate and the impact of graft removal should be considered but not always indicated. Liver allograft recipients are at increased risk of some de novo cancers, especially those grafted for alcohol-related liver disease and hepatitis C virus infection. The risk of lymphoproliferative disease and cancers of the skin, upper airway and bowel are increased but not breast. Recipients should be advised to avoid risk behavior and monitored appropriately.

Donor cancer transmission in kidney transplantation: a systematic review

Transplantation of any biological material from a donor to a host will carry some inherent risk of disease transmission. Our aims were to summarize the totality of the published evidence about donor cancer transmission among kidney transplant recipients and to determine the cancer-specific survival of these patients. We systematically reviewed all case reports, case series and registry studies that described the outcomes of kidney transplant recipients with donor cancer transmission published to December 2012. A total of 69 studies with 104 donor-transmitted cancer cases were identified. The most common transmitted cancer types were renal cancer (n = 20, 19%), followed by melanoma (n = 18, 17%), lymphoma (n = 15, 14%) and lung cancer (n = 9, 9%). Patients with melanoma and lung cancers had the worst prognosis, with less than 50% of recipients surviving after 24 months from transplantation. Recipients with transmitted renal cancers had the best outcomes, with over 70% of recipients surviving for at least 24 months after transplantation. Overall, the risk of donor transmission of cancer appears low, but there is a high likelihood of reporting bias. Our findings support the current recommendations for rejecting organs from donors with a history of melanoma and lung cancer, but suggest that the use of donor kidneys with a history of small, incidental renal cell cancer may be reasonable.

[Conservative treatment of renal cell carcinoma in kidney transplantation]

PURPOSE

To evaluate the new treatment strategies in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) that affects the graft in renal recipients.

ACQUISITION OF EVIDENCE

A literature review is made, analyzing all the published cases of conservative surgery in renal graft RCC.

SYNTHESIS OF EVIDENCE

A total of 51 partial nephrectomies in renal graft patients have been described, with a graft survival rate of 88% and a recurrence rate of 6%. Most of the patients (75%) were asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis, and the mean lesion size was 2.8 cm. Enucleation was the most frequent technique employed. 77% of all immunosuppressor regimens included cyclosporine A. Six patients with graft RCC were subjected to radiofrequency ablation and two patients underwent percutaneous cryoablation, with a single case of relapse and a graft survival rate of 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Nephron-sparing surgery is a good management option in renal graft RCC, affording good oncological control and graft survival. Modification of immunosuppression with the withdrawal of cyclosporine A and the introduction of mTOR inhibitors is an adequate measure in such patients.

Role of MDCT angiography in selection and presurgical planning of potential renal donors

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and types of renal and extrarenal abnormalities that preclude renal donation or lead to alteration of the surgical approach on the basis of abdominal CT angiography (CTA) in a large group of potential renal donors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, 654 potential renal donors undergoing dual-phase CTA were identified from January 2005 to January 2009. The CT reports were systemically reviewed by two radiologists to determine the presence of renal and extrarenal abnormalities. The operative notes of the renal donors were reviewed by one radiologist to determine whether the presence of renal pathology had affected the surgical approach. In the candidates who did not proceed to kidney donation, the reasons that precluded kidney donation were abstracted from the transplant database.

RESULTS

Four hundred seventeen potential donors (269 men and 385 women; mean age, 44.0 years; age range, 17-79 years) proceeded to renal donation and 237 did not. The most common renal abnormalities were cysts (34%) and renal stones (4.4%). Renal artery disease was identified in 3.4% of potential donors, including renal artery stenosis, possible fibromuscular dysplasia, and renal artery aneurysm. Suspicious renal masses were incidentally found in 0.5% of potential donors. The most common extrarenal pathology was an incidental adrenal nodule (2.6%). Other significant extrarenal pathology identified included gallbladder mass (0.2%), Crohn disease (0.2%), ovarian mass (0.2%), and possible sarcoidosis (0.2%). Although renal and extrarenal abnormalities were present in 41% of potential renal donors, abnormalities seen on CT only contributed to exclusion of 27 potential donors (4.1%). The most common reason for exclusion was the presence of renal stones or scarring (1.8%). Significant CT findings also contributed to the selection of the right kidney in 29 donors, most commonly due to presence of ipsilateral vascular disease or complex left vascular anatomy.

CONCLUSION

Renal parenchymal and vascular abnormalities are common in asymptomatic potential kidney donors. Although most of these represent incidental CT findings, abnormalities can exclude potential renal donors and alter the surgical approach in a small minority of cases.

Organ donor found to have von Hippel-Lindau disease: case report

Multiple pancreatic cyst in combination with central nervous system hemangioma may be associated with Von Hippel-Lindau disease. The disease manifests with other systemic benign and malignant lesions. The risk of associated malignancy makes it imperative to review target organs before proceeding to transplantation, but does not preclude it completely if proper evaluation is performed. We present a case of an organ donor found to have multiple pancreatic cysts. Evaluation and transplantation decisions are discussed.

Renal transplantation with kidneys affected by tumours

Renal transplantation confers improvement in quality of life and survival when compared to patients on dialysis. There is a universal shortage of organs, and efforts have been made to overcome this shortage by exploring new sources. One such area is the use of kidneys containing small tumours after resection of the neoplasm. This paper looks at the current evidence in the literature and reviews the feasibility of utilizing such a source.

Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma in a renal transplant recipient

The incidence of transplanted kidneys derived from elderly donors is increasing because of the larger waiting lists and greater age of patients with end-stage renal failure. Compared with young donors, one of the problems is the heightened risk of neoplasm transmission. We report 2 cases of kidney recipients, both of whom developed a sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma after receiving a kidney transplant from the same 68-year-old male donor, who did not show signs of a neoplasm on a previous abdominal ultrasound or a pretransplant biopsy. The first recipient was a 66-year-old woman who developed a kidney mass with several urologic obstructive complications, tumor dissemination, and death at 9 months after kidney transplantation. The second recipient was a 48-year-old asymptomatic man with normal renal function, who was studied after the results of the first recipient, revealing another renal tumor. Transplant nephrectomy was performed and a peritoneal implant was resected. The patient is alive without evidence of a neoplasm after 18 months. Herein we have discussed the mechanisms of neoplasm transmission in kidney transplantation and possible strategies for its prevention and treatment.

Treatment options and outcome for renal cell tumors in the transplanted kidney

The diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma in a transplanted kidney is rare but with possibly devastating consequences. In addition to transplant nephrectomy, which inevitably results in a return to dialysis, various treatment options such as different techniques for nephron sparing surgery and local ablative procedures (like radiofrequency ablation or cryoablation) have been described in the literature. An important issue is to find the balance between the preservation of the transplant function, on the one hand, which is dependent on the maintenance of an immunosuppressive regimen, and a sufficiently radical tumor therapy on the other hand. To provide an overview of current therapeutic attempts to cure transplant renal cell carcinoma under these conditions, published data on related therapies and outcomes are summarized.

Donor derived malignancy following transplantation: a review

Organ and tissue transplant is now the treatment of choice for many end stage diseases. In the recent years, there has been an increasing demand for organs but not a similar increase in the supply leading to a severe shortage of organs for transplant resulted in increasing wait times for recipients. This has resulted in expanded donor criteria to include older donors and donors with mild disease. In spite of implementation of more stringent criteria for donor selection, there continues to be some risk of donor derived malignancy. Malignancy after transplantation can occur in three different ways: (a) de-novo occurrence, (b) recurrence of malignancy, and (c) donor-related malignancy. Donor related malignancy can be either due to direct transmission of tumor or due to tumor arising in cells of donor origin. We will review donor related malignancies following solid organ transplantation and hematopoeitic progenitor cell transplantation. Further, we will briefly review the methods for detection and management of these donor related malignancies.