Clinical and immunological evaluation of 12-month azithromycin therapy in chronic lung allograft rejection

Novel approaches for long-term lung transplant survival

Allograft failure remains a major barrier in the field of lung transplantation and results primarily from acute and chronic rejection. To date, standard-of-care immunosuppressive regimens have proven unsuccessful in achieving acceptable long-term graft and patient survival. Recent insights into the unique immunologic properties of lung allografts provide an opportunity to develop more effective immunosuppressive strategies. Here we describe advances in our understanding of the mechanisms driving lung allograft rejection and highlight recent progress in the development of novel, lung-specific strategies aimed at promoting long-term allograft survival, including tolerance.

Effect of azithromycin on bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome in posttransplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is a devastating complication that occurs after transplantation. Although azithromycin is currently used for the treatment of BOS, the evidence is sparse and controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the effects of azithromycin on forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and patient's survival.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Web of Science databases, and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry were systematically searched from inception until December 2020 for relevant original research articles. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled-effect estimates.

RESULTS

Searches identified 15 eligible studies involving 694 participants. For FEV1 (L), there was a significant increase after short-term (≤12 weeks; P = .00) and mid-term (12-24 weeks; P = .01) administration of azithromycin. For FEV1 (%) compared to baseline, there was a significant increase after short-term (≤12 weeks) administration of azithromycin (P = .02), while there were no statistically significant differences in the medium and long term. When pooled FEV1% was predicted, it exhibited a similar trend to FEV1 (%) compared to baseline. In addition, we discovered that azithromycin reduced the risk of death (hazard ratio = 0.26; 95% confidence interval = 0.17 to 0.40; P = .00) in patients with BOS post-lung transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Azithromycin therapy is both effective and safe for lung function improvement in patients with posttransplant BOS after the short- and medium-term administration. Additionally, it has been demonstrated a significant survival benefit among patients with BOS post-lung transplant. Higher quality randomized controlled trials and more extensive prospective cohort studies are needed to confirm the effect of azithromycin on patients with posttransplant BOS.

Management of chronic rejection after lung transplantation

Outcomes after lung transplantation are limited by chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). The incidence of CLAD is high, and its clinical course tends to be progressive over time, culminating in graft failure and death. Indeed, CLAD is the leading cause of death beyond the first year after lung transplantation. Therapy for CLAD has been limited by a lack of high-quality studies to guide management. In this review, we will discuss the diagnosis of CLAD in light of the recent changes to definitions and will discuss the current clinical evidence available for treatment. Recently, the diagnosis of CLAD has been subdivided into bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) and restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS). The current evidence for treatment of CLAD mainly revolves around treatment of BOS with more limited data existing for RAS. The best supported treatment to date for CLAD is the macrolide antibiotic azithromycin which has been associated with a small improvement in lung function in a minority of patients. Other therapies that have more limited data include switching immunosuppression from cyclosporine to tacrolimus, fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux, montelukast, extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), aerosolized cyclosporine, cytolytic anti-lymphocyte therapies, total lymphoid irradiation (TLI) and the antifibrotic agent pirfenidone. Most of these treatments are supported by case series and observational studies. Finally, we will discuss the role of retransplantation for CLAD.

Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction: Evolving Concepts and Therapies

The primary factor that limits long-term survival after lung transplantation is chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). CLAD also impairs quality of life and increases the costs of medical care. Our understanding of CLAD continues to evolve. Consensus definitions of CLAD and the major CLAD phenotypes were recently updated and clarified, but it remains to be seen whether the current definitions will lead to advances in management or impact care. Understanding the potential differences in pathogenesis for each CLAD phenotype may lead to novel therapeutic strategies, including precision medicine. Recognition of CLAD risk factors may lead to earlier interventions to mitigate risk, or to avoid risk factors all together, to prevent the development of CLAD. Unfortunately, currently available therapies for CLAD are usually not effective. However, novel therapeutics aimed at both prevention and treatment are currently under investigation. We provide an overview of the updates to CLAD-related terminology, clinical phenotypes and their diagnosis, natural history, pathogenesis, and potential strategies to treat and prevent CLAD.

Immunosuppressive strategies in lung transplantation

Lung transplantation is a viable option for those with end-stage lung disease which is evidenced by the continued increase in the number of lung transplantations worldwide. However, patients and clinicians are constantly faced with acute and chronic rejection, infectious complications, drug toxicities, and malignancies throughout the lifetime of the lung transplant recipient. Conventional maintenance immunosuppression therapy consisting of a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), anti-metabolite, and corticosteroids have become the standard regimen but newer agents and modalities continue to be developed. Here we will review induction agents, maintenance immunosuppressives, adjunctive therapies and other strategies to improve long-term outcomes.

Detection, classification, and management of rejection after lung transplantation

Rejection is a major complication following lung transplantation. Acute cellular rejection, lymphocytic bronchiolitis, and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) are all risk factors for the subsequent development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Acute cellular rejection and lymphocytic bronchiolitis have well defined histopathologic diagnostic criteria and grading. Diagnosis of AMR requires a multidisciplinary approach. CLAD is the major barrier to long-term survival following lung transplantation. The most common phenotype of CLAD is bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) which is defined by a persistent obstructive decline in lung function. Restrictive allograft dysfunction (RAS) is a second phenotype of CLAD and is associated with a worse prognosis. This article will review the diagnosis, staging, clinical presentation, and treatment of acute rejection, AMR, and CLAD following lung transplantation.

Update in Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the major limitation to posttransplant survival. This review highlights the evolving definition of CLAD, risk factors, treatment, and expected outcomes after the development of CLAD.

A call to arms: a critical need for interventions to limit pulmonary toxicity in the stem cell transplantation patient population

Noninfectious pulmonary toxicity after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) causes significant morbidity and mortality. Main presentations are idiopathic pneumonia syndrome (IPS) in the acute setting and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) and cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (COP) at later time point. While COP responds well to corticosteroids, IPS and BOS often are treatment refractory. IPS, in most cases, is rapidly fatal, whereas BOS progresses over time, resulting in chronic respiratory failure, impaired quality of life, and eventually, death. Standard second-line treatments are currently lacking, and current approaches, such as augmented T cell-directed immunosuppression, B cell depletion, TNF blockade, extracorporeal photopheresis, and tyroskine kinase inhibitor therapy, are unsatisfactory with responses in only a subset of patients. Better understanding of underlying pathophysiology hopefully results in the identification of future targets for preventive and therapeutic strategies along with an emphasis on currently underutilized rehabilitative and supportive measures.

Use of macrolides in lung diseases: recent literature controversies

OBJECTIVE

To review the mechanisms of action of macrolides in pediatric respiratory diseases and their clinical indications.

SOURCES

Review in the PubMed database, comprising the following terms in English: "macrolide and asthma"; "macrolide and cystic fibrosis"; "macrolide bronchiolitis and viral acute"; "macrolide and bronchiolitis obliterans" and "macrolide and non-CF bronchiectasis".

SUMMARY OF THE FINDINGS

The spectrum of action of macrolides includes production of inflammatory mediators, control of mucus hypersecretion, and modulation of host-defense mechanisms. The potential benefit of macrolide antibiotics has been studied in a variety of lung diseases, such as cystic fibrosis (CF), bronchiectasis, asthma, acute bronchiolitis, and non-CF bronchiectasis. Several studies have evaluated the benefits of macrolides in asthma refractory to therapy, but the results are controversial and indications should be limited to specific phenotypes. In viral bronchiolitis, there is no consistent benefit in acute conditions, although recent data have shown an effect in recurrent wheezing prevention. In patients with CF results are also contradictory, but the consensus states there is a small clinical benefit, especially for patients infected with P. aeruginosa. There was also no positive action of macrolides in patients with post-infectious bronchiolitis obliterans. Children with non-CF bronchiectasis seem to have clear benefits regarding the use of macrolides, which showed clinical advantages in parenchyma protection and lung function.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term use of macrolides should be limited to highly selected situations, especially in patients with bronchiectasis. Careful evaluation of the benefits and potential damage are tools for their indication in specific groups.

Current views on chronic rejection after lung transplantation

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) was recently introduced as an overarching term mainly to classify patients with chronic rejection after lung transplantation, although other conditions may also qualify for CLAD. Initially, only the development of a persistent and obstructive pulmonary function defect, clinically identified as bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), was considered as chronic rejection, if no other cause could be identified. It became clear in recent years that some patients do not qualify for this definition, although they developed a chronic and persistent decrease in FEV1 , without another identifiable cause. As the pulmonary function decline in these patients was rather restrictive, this was called restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS). In the present review, we will further elaborate on these two CLAD phenotypes, with specific attention to the diagnostic criteria, the role of pathology and imaging, the risk factors, outcome, and the possible treatment options.

Effects of azithromycin and tanomastat on experimental bronchiolitis obliterans

OBJECTIVE

Azithromycin has become a standard of care in therapy of bronchiolitis obliterans following lung transplantation. Matrix metalloprotease-9 broncho-alveolar lavage levels increase in airway neutrophilia and bronchiolitis obliterans. Interleukin-17 may play a role in lung allograft rejection, and interleukin-12 is downregulated in bronchiolitis obliterans. Whether these mechanisms can be targeted by azithromycin remains unclear.

METHODS

Bronchiolitis obliterans was induced by transplantation of Fischer F344 rat left lungs to Wistar Kyoto rats. Allografts with azithromycin therapy from day 1 to 28 or 56 and mono- or combination therapy with the broad-spectrum matrix metalloprotease inhibitor tanomastat from day 1 to 56 were compared to control allografts and isografts. Graft histology was assessed, and tissue cytokine expression studied using Western blotting and immunofluorescence.

RESULTS

The chronic airway rejection score in the azithromycin group did not change between 4 and 8 weeks after transplantation, whereas it significantly worsened in control allografts (P = .041). Azithromycin+tanomastat prevented complete allograft fibrosis, which occurred in 40% of control allografts. Azithromycin reduced interleukin-17 expression (P = .049) and the number of IL-17(+)/CD8(+) lymphocytes at 4 weeks, and active matrix metalloprotease-9 at 8 weeks (P = .017), and increased interleukin-12 expression (P = .025) at 8 weeks following transplantation versus control allografts.

CONCLUSIONS

The expression of interleukin-17 and matrix metalloprotease-9 in bronchiolitis obliterans may be attenuated by azithromycin, and the decrease in interleukin-12 expression was prevented by azithromycin. Combination of azithromycin with a matrix metalloprotease inhibitor is worth studying further because it prevented complete allograft fibrosis in this study.

Azithromycin and the treatment of lymphocytic airway inflammation after lung transplantation

Lymphocytic airway inflammation is a major risk factor for chronic lung allograft dysfunction, for which there is no established treatment. We investigated whether azithromycin could control lymphocytic airway inflammation and improve allograft function. Fifteen lung transplant recipients demonstrating acute allograft dysfunction due to isolated lymphocytic airway inflammation were prospectively treated with azithromycin for at least 6 months (NCT01109160). Spirometry (FVC, FEV1 , FEF25-75 , Tiffeneau index) and FeNO were assessed before and up to 12 months after initiation of azithromycin. Radiologic features, local inflammation assessed on airway biopsy (rejection score, IL-17(+)  cells/mm(2) lamina propria) and broncho-alveolar lavage fluid (total and differential cell counts, chemokine and cytokine levels); as well as systemic C-reactive protein levels were compared between baseline and after 3 months of treatment. Airflow improved and FeNO decreased to baseline levels after 1 month of azithromycin and were sustained thereafter. After 3 months of treatment, radiologic abnormalities, submucosal cellular inflammation, lavage protein levels of IL-1β, IL-8/CXCL-8, IP-10/CXCL-10, RANTES/CCL5, MIP1-α/CCL3, MIP-1β/CCL4, Eotaxin, PDGF-BB, total cell count, neutrophils and eosinophils, as well as plasma C-reactive protein levels all significantly decreased compared to baseline (p < 0.05). Administration of azithromycin was associated with suppression of posttransplant lymphocytic airway inflammation and clinical improvement in lung allograft function.

Immunosuppression in lung transplantation

Lung transplantation can be a life-saving procedure for those with end-stage lung diseases. Unfortunately, long term graft and patient survival are limited by both acute and chronic allograft rejection, with a median survival of just over 6 years. Immunosuppressive regimens are employed to reduce the rate of rejection, and while protocols vary from center to center, conventional maintenance therapy consists of triple drug therapy with a calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine or tacrolimus), antiproliferative agents [azathioprine (AZA), mycophenolate, sirolimus (srl), everolimus (evl)], and corticosteroids (CS). Roughly 50% of lung transplant centers also utilize induction therapy, with polyclonal antibody preparations [equine or rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)], interleukin 2 receptor antagonists (IL2RAs) (daclizumab or basiliximab), or alemtuzumab. This review summarizes these agents and the data surrounding their use in lung transplantation, as well as additional common and novel therapies in lung transplantation. Despite the progression of the management of lung transplant recipients, they continue to be at high risk of treatment-related complications, and poor graft and patient survival. Randomized clinical trials are needed to allow for the development of better agents, regimens and techniques to address above mentioned issues and reduce morbidity and mortality among lung transplant recipients.

Immunosuppression and allograft rejection following lung transplantation: evidence to date

The enduring success of lung transplantation is built on the use of immunosuppressive drugs to stop the immune system from rejecting the newly transplanted lung allograft. Most patients receive a triple-drug maintenance immunosuppressive regimen consisting of a calcineurin inhibitor, an antiproliferative and corticosteroids. Induction therapy with either an antilymphocyte monoclonal or an interleukin-2 receptor antagonist are prescribed by many centres aiming to achieve rapid inhibition of recently activated and potentially alloreactive T lymphocytes. Despite this generic approach acute rejection episodes remain common, mandating further fine-tuning and augmentation of the immunosuppressive regimen. While there has been a trend away from cyclosporine and azathioprine towards a preference for tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil, this has not translated into significant protection from the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction, the main barrier to the long-term success of lung transplantation. This article reviews the problem of lung allograft rejection and the evidence for immunosuppressive regimens used both in the short- and long-term in patients undergoing lung transplantation.

Azithromycin: mechanisms of action and their relevance for clinical applications

Azithromycin is a macrolide antibiotic which inhibits bacterial protein synthesis, quorum-sensing and reduces the formation of biofilm. Accumulating effectively in cells, particularly phagocytes, it is delivered in high concentrations to sites of infection, as reflected in rapid plasma clearance and extensive tissue distribution. Azithromycin is indicated for respiratory, urogenital, dermal and other bacterial infections, and exerts immunomodulatory effects in chronic inflammatory disorders, including diffuse panbronchiolitis, post-transplant bronchiolitis and rosacea. Modulation of host responses facilitates its long-term therapeutic benefit in cystic fibrosis, non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis, exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and non-eosinophilic asthma. Initial, stimulatory effects of azithromycin on immune and epithelial cells, involving interactions with phospholipids and Erk1/2, are followed by later modulation of transcription factors AP-1, NFκB, inflammatory cytokine and mucin release. Delayed inhibitory effects on cell function and high lysosomal accumulation accompany disruption of protein and intracellular lipid transport, regulation of surface receptor expression, of macrophage phenotype and autophagy. These later changes underlie many immunomodulatory effects of azithromycin, contributing to resolution of acute infections and reduction of exacerbations in chronic airway diseases. A sub-group of post-transplant bronchiolitis patients appears to be sensitive to azithromycin, as may be patients with severe sepsis. Other promising indications include chronic prostatitis and periodontitis, but weak activity in malaria is unlikely to prove crucial. Long-term administration of azithromycin must be balanced against the potential for increased bacterial resistance. Azithromycin has a very good record of safety, but recent reports indicate rare cases of cardiac torsades des pointes in patients at risk.

A new classification system for chronic lung allograft dysfunction

Although survival after lung transplantation has improved significantly during the last decade, chronic rejection is thought to be the major cause of late mortality. The physiologic hallmark of chronic rejection has been a persistent fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second associated with an obstructive ventilatory defect, for which the term bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) was defined to allow a uniformity of description and grading of severity throughout the world. Although BOS was generally thought to be irreversible, recent evidence suggests that some patients with BOS may respond to azithromycin with > 10% improvement in their forced expiratory volume in 1 second. In addition, a restrictive form of chronic rejection has recently been described that does not fit the strict definition of BOS as an obstructive defect. Hence, the term chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) has been introduced to cover all forms of graft dysfunction, but CLAD has yet to be defined. We propose a definition of CLAD and a flow chart that may facilitate recognition of the different phenotypes of CLAD that can complicate the clinical course of lung transplant recipients.

Phenotyping established chronic lung allograft dysfunction predicts extracorporeal photopheresis response in lung transplant patients

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) remains the leading cause of mortality in lung transplant recipients after the first year. Treatment remains limited and unpredictable. Existing data suggests extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) may be beneficial. This study aimed to identify factors predicting treatment response and the prognostic implications. A single center retrospective analysis of all patients commencing ECP for CLAD between November 1, 2007 and September 1, 2011 was performed. In total 65 patients were included, 64 of whom had deteriorated under azithromycin. Median follow-up after commencing ECP was 503 days. Upon commencing ECP, all patients were classified using proposed criteria for emerging clinical phenotypes, including "restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS)", "neutrophilic CLAD (nCLAD)" and "rapid decliners". At follow-up, 8 patients demonstrated ≥10% improvement in FEV1 , 27 patients had stabilized and 30 patients exhibited ≥10% decline in FEV1 . Patients fulfilling criteria for "rapid decliners" (n=21, p=0.005), RAS (n=22, p=0.002) and those not exhibiting neutrophilia in bronchoalveolar lavage (n=44, p=0.01) exhibited poorer outcomes. ECP appears an effective second line treatment in CLAD patients progressing under azithromycin. ECP responders demonstrated improved progression-free survival (median 401 vs. 133 days). Proposed CLAD phenotypes require refinement, but appear to predict the likelihood of ECP response.

Anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties of azithromycin involved in treatment and prevention of chronic lung allograft rejection

Chronic lung allograft rejection is the single most important cause of death in lung transplant recipients after the first postoperative year, resulting in a 5-year survival rate of approximately 50%, which is far behind that of other solid organ transplantations. Spirometry is routinely used as a clinical marker for assessing pulmonary allograft function and diagnosing chronic lung allograft rejection after lung transplantation (LTx). As such, a progressive obstructive decline in pulmonary allograft function (forced expiratory volume in 1 sec [FEV1]) in absence of all other causes (currently defined as bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome [BOS]) is considered to reflect the evolution of chronic lung allograft rejection. BOS has a 5-year prevalence of approximately 45% and is thought to be the final common endpoint of various alloimmunologic and nonalloimmunologic injuries to the pulmonary allograft, triggering different innate and adaptive immune responses. Most preventive and therapeutic strategies for this complex process have thus far been largely unsuccessful. However, the introduction of the neomacrolide antibiotic azithromycin (AZI) in the field of LTx as of 2003 made it clear that some patients with established BOS might in fact benefit from such therapy due to its various antiinflammatory and immunomodulatory properties, as summarized in this review. Particularly in patients with an increased bronchoalveolar lavage neutrophilia (i.e., 15%-20% or more), AZI treatment could result in an increase in FEV1 of at least 10%. More recently, it has become clear that prophylactic therapy with AZI actually may prevent BOS and improve FEV1 after LTx, most likely through its interactions with the innate immune system. However, one should always be aware of possible adverse effects related to AZI when implementing this drug as prophylactic or long-term treatment. Even so, AZI therapy after LTx can generally be considered as safe.

Graft rejection - endogenous or allogeneic?

The presence and persistence of alloantigen is necessary for graft-specific T-cell-mediated immunity. However, specificity comprises only a single facet of an extremely complex process. Evidence is accruing to suggest that immunogenicity could be manipulated by endogenous ligands released during tissue injury. Stress molecules are significantly up-regulated following transplantation and stimulate conserved receptors on a range of leucocytes, including dendritic cells (DCs). The DCs are essential for co-stimulation and the induction of adaptive immunity. Stress signals can act as an adjuvant leading to DC maturation and activation. DCs stimulated by endogens exhibit enhanced alloantigen presentation, co-stimulation and production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and IL-18. Inflammasomes have a major role in IL-1β/IL-18 production and secretion, and can be stimulated by endogens. Importantly, the polarization toward inflammatory T helper type 17 cells as opposed to regulatory T cells is dependent upon, among other factors, IL-1β. This highlights an important differentiation pathway that may be influenced by endogenous signals. Minimizing graft damage and stress expression should hypothetically be advantageous, and we feel that this area warrants further research, and may provide novel treatment modalities with potential clinical benefit.