Late-onset graft-versus-host disease after pediatric living-related liver transplantation for Langerhans cell histiocytosis

The Consequences of HLA Screening in the Prevention of Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Living Donor Liver Transplantation

AIMS

To study the effects of routine HLA screening and the policy of avoiding donor-dominant one-way HLA match to prevent graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The records of potential living liver donors and recipients who attended our center between 2007 and 2018 were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Of the 149 patients who underwent LDLT and survived longer than 3 months, two developed GVHD despite our strict policy. The first patient presented with grade II GVHD limited to the skin. She was treated successfully by briefly discontinuing immunosuppression and switching to everolimus. In the second case, the policy had been relaxed due to the availability of a single donor for ABO-incompatible transplantation without any intervention to decrease anti-A antibody levels (special case: A2 to O). Nevertheless, the patient presented with grade I GVHD limited to skin and was treated successfully by adding oral methylprednisolone to tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. To the best of our information, this is the second reported case who recovered from GVHD after LDLT from a donor, homozygous at HLA A, B and DR and a recipient, heterozygous for all. Sixteen potential donors (1.2% of all candidates) of 14 recipients were disqualified solely on the basis of the HLA results; five of these patients died due to unavailability of another donor.

CONCLUSION

The results support the policy of avoiding HLA combinations that preclude immune recognition of graft lymphocytes as foreign to decrease the risk of GVHD after LDLT.

Role of HLA typing and chimerism analysis in post-liver transplantation GVHD in pediatrics: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

GVHD is a well-documented complication after liver transplantation. GVHD occurs when donor immune cells mount a destructive immune response against host cells. The rarity of the GVHD complication and the nonspecific presentation of symptoms and histopathological features provide a diagnostic challenge. Therefore, diagnosis and initiation of treatment are often delayed.

AIM

In this systematic review, we assessed relevant literature to better understand the utilization of HLA typing and chimerism analysis in liver transplantation. We mainly focused on their importance in diagnosing GVHD incidence after liver transplantation.

RESULTS

A total of 18 articles reported 21 cases of GVHD after liver transplantation in pediatrics. Generally, there is a consensus on the advantage of HLA typing and chimerism analysis in confirming the diagnosis of GVHD after liver transplantation. However, there is an inconsistency in the timing and the application of the accurate HLA typing and chimerism analysis.

CONCLUSION

Further studies are required to assess the incidence of GVHD post-LT and to determine the impact of HLA typing and chimerism analysis in assessing the risk, early determination of GVHD incidence, and improving outcomes. This systematic review highlights the gap in the field of liver transplantation and calls for revisiting the guidelines to consider HLA typing and chimerism analysis in predicting GVHD before transplantation and diagnosing GVHD incidence after liver transplantation.

Graft-versus-host disease after pediatric liver transplantation: A diagnostic challenge

BACKGROUND

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a rare but serious complication after pediatric liver transplantation (LTx). Early diagnosis is difficult due to nonspecific presenting symptoms and non-pathognomonic skin histopathological features. The aim of this article was to describe a case of pediatric GVHD after LTx and to review available data on pediatric GVHD highlighting the diagnostic difficulty. We also propose a diagnostic algorithm to improve the diagnostic capability and increase clinical awareness about this potentially fatal condition.

METHODS

We did a comprehensive literatures review on studies on GvHD following pediatric LTx between 1990 and February 2021, chimerism study by short tandem repeat (STR), HLA typing by sequence-specific oligonucleotide (SSO) method, and flowcytometry crossmatch.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 23 case reports. The most common clinical manifestations were fever and rash (91%) followed by diarrhea. Mortality rate was 36.8% mainly due to sepsis and organ failure. Diagnosis was challenging and chimerism study to confirm donor engraftment was performed on only half of the cases. Prevalence of "donor dominant HLA one-way matching" typically occurs in homozygous parents-to-child transplantation was 75% in cases with HLA testing.

CONCLUSION

So far, there are no available standard diagnostic criteria for GVHD following pediatric LTx. Recognition of multiple risk factors through proper laboratory assessment can predict the occurrence, and early chimerism study can confirm suggestive clinical manifestation. The strong likelihood of developing GVHD in "donor one-way HLA match" and the severe problems imposed by this complication may justify avoidance of HLA homozygous parent's donation.

Liver Transplantation for Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis: A US Population-Based Analysis and Systematic Review of the Literature

Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is the most common histiocytic disorder. Liver involvement is seen in 10.1% to 19.8% of patients with LCH and can lead to secondary sclerosing cholangitis requiring liver transplantation (LT). We describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing LT for LCH. All patients undergoing a first LT for LCH in the United States were identified in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database (1987-2018). The Kaplan-Meier curve method and log-rank tests evaluated post-LT survival. A systematic literature review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. A total of 60 LCH LT recipients were identified in the SRTR, and 55 patients (91.7%) were children with median total bilirubin levels at LT of 5.8 mg/dL (interquartile range [IQR], 2.7-12.9). A total of 49 patients (81.7%) underwent deceased donor LT (DDLT). The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year patient survival rates were 86.6%, 82.4%, and 82.4%, respectively. The systematic review yielded 26 articles reporting on 50 patients. Of the patients, 41 were children (82.0%), 90.0% had multisystem LCH, and most patients underwent DDLT (91.9%; n = 34/37). Pre-LT chemotherapy was administered in 74.0% and steroids in 71.7% (n = 33/46) of the patients, and a recurrence of LCH to the liver was reported in 8.0% of the patients. Of the 50 patients, 11 (22.0%) died during a median follow-up of 25.2 months (IQR, 9.0-51.6), and the 1-year patient survival rate was 79.4%. LT can be considered as a feasible life-saving option for the management of liver failure secondary to LCH in well-selected patients.

Invasive Fungal Diseases in Children with Hematological Malignancies Treated with Therapies That Target Cell Surface Antigens: Monoclonal Antibodies, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and CAR T-Cell Therapies

Since 1985 when the first agent targeting antigens on the surface of lymphocytes was approved (muromonab-CD3), a multitude of such therapies have been used in children with hematologic malignancies. A detailed literature review until January 2021 was conducted regarding pediatric patient populations treated with agents that target CD2 (alefacept), CD3 (bispecific T-cell engager [BiTE] blinatumomab), CD19 (denintuzumab mafodotin, B43, BiTEs blinatumomab and DT2219ARL, the immunotoxin combotox, and chimeric antigen receptor [CAR] T-cell therapies tisagenlecleucel and axicabtagene ciloleucel), CD20 (rituximab and biosimilars, 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan, ofatumumab, and obinutuzumab), CD22 (epratuzumab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, moxetumomab pasudotox, BiTE DT2219ARL, and the immunotoxin combotox), CD25 (basiliximab and inolimomab), CD30 (brentuximab vedotin and iratumumab), CD33 (gemtuzumab ozogamicin), CD38 (daratumumab and isatuximab), CD52 (alemtuzumab), CD66b (90Y-labelled BW 250/183), CD248 (ontuxizumab) and immune checkpoint inhibitors against CTLA-4 (CD152; abatacept, ipilimumab and tremelimumab) or with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade (CD279/CD274; atezolizumab, avelumab, camrelizumab, durvalumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab). The aim of this narrative review is to describe treatment-related invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) of each category of agents. IFDs are very common in patients under blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, basiliximab, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, alemtuzumab, and tisagenlecleucel and uncommon in patients treated with moxetumomab pasudotox, brentuximab vedotin, abatacept, ipilimumab, pembrolizumab and avelumab. Although this new era of precision medicine shows promising outcomes of targeted therapies in children with leukemia or lymphoma, the results of this review stress the necessity for ongoing surveillance and suggest the need for antifungal prophylaxis in cases where IFDs are very common complications.

Combination of Neoadjuvant Therapy and Liver Transplantation in Pediatric Multisystem Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis With Liver Involvement

Background: Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is characterized by misguided myeloid differentiation, whose prognosis was poor with involvement of risk organs. Remaining issues include how to improve the outcomes of patients with risk-organ involvement.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in Renji Hospital exploring the effects of neoadjuvant therapy in combination with pediatric liver transplantation (LT) for LCH patients based on data collected between October 2006 and October 2019.

Results: We presented here five cases of multisystem LCH patients underwent systemic chemotherapy to control active lesions, followed by LT to treat end-stage liver diseases. Manifestations before LT included elevated transaminase levels (n = 5, 100%), jaundice (n = 4, 80%), ascites (n = 3, 60%), and variceal hemorrhage (n = 1, 20%). Three patients underwent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) and two underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Until December 2019, median follow-up time was 32 months (range, 2–67 months). Liver functions significantly improved compared with pre-operative conditions. One patient had perioperative hepatic artery complications and one patient had a recurrence in the lung. EBV infection occurred in four (80%) patients and CMV infection occurred in one (20%). There was one case of drug-induced liver injury diagnosed on biopsy 13 months after LT. None underwent re-transplantation and there were no rejection or portal vein and biliary complications.

Conclusion: Combination of neoadjuvant therapy and LT is an effective paradigm in treatment of multisystem LCH with severe liver dysfunction. With advances in chemotherapy regimen for multisystem LCH and LT surgery, perspectives on prognosis for LCH children are promising.

Graft-versus-host disease after liver transplantation: A comprehensive literature review

AIM: To determine the factors affecting mortality in patients who developed graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) after liver transplantation (LT).

METHODS: We performed a review of studies of GvHD following LT published in the English literature and accessed the PubMed, Medline, EBSCO, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases. Using relevant search phrases, 88 articles were identified. Of these, 61 articles containing most of the study parameters were considered eligible for the study. Risk factors were first examined using a univariate Kaplan-Meier model, and variables with a significant association (P < 0.05) were then subjected to multivariate analyses using a Cox proportional-hazards model.

RESULTS: The 61 articles reported 87 patients, 58 male and 29 female, mean age, 40.4 ± 15.5 years (range: 8 mo to 74 years), who met the inclusion criteria for the present study. Deaths occurred in 59 (67.8%) patients, whereas 28 (32.2%) survived after a mean follow-up period of 280.8 ± 316.2 d (range: 27-2285 d). Among the most frequent symptoms were rash (94.2%), fever (66.6%), diarrhea (54%), and pancytopenia (54%). The average time period between LT and first symptom onset was 60.6 ± 190.1 d (range: 2-1865 d). The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that pancytopenia (42.8% vs 59.3%, P = 0.03), diarrhea (39.2% vs 61.0%, P = 0.04), age difference between the recipient and the donor (14.6 ± 3.1 years vs 22.6 ± 2.7 years, P < 0.0001), and time from first symptom occurrence to diagnosis or treatment (13.3 ± 2.6 mo vs 15.0 ± 2.3 mo, P < 0.0001) were significant factors affecting mortality, whereas age, sex, presence of rash and fever, use of immunosuppressive agents, acute rejection before GvHD, etiological causes, time of onset, and donor type were not associated with mortality risk. The Cox proportional-hazards model, determined that an age difference between the recipient and donor was an independent risk factor (P = 0.03; hazard ratio, 7.395, 95% confidence interval, 1.2-46.7).

CONCLUSION: This study showed that an age difference between the recipient and donor is an independent risk factor for mortality in patients who develop GvHD after LT.

Acute graft versus host disease after orthotopic liver transplantation

Graft versus host disease (GVHD) is an uncommon complication after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) with an incidence of 0.1–2%, but an 80–100% mortality rate. Patients can present with skin rashes, diarrhea, and bone marrow aplasia between two to eight weeks after OLT. Diagnosis of GVHD is made based on clinical and histologic evidence, supported by chimerism studies showing donor HLA alleles in the recipient bone marrow or blood. Several therapeutic approaches have been used for the management of GVHD after OLT including increased immunosuppression, decreased immunosuppression, and cellular therapies. However, success rates have been low, and new approaches are needed.