Spurious prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence after radical prostatectomy: Interference by human antimouse heterophile antibodies

Falsely Undetectable Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Due to Presence of an Inhibitory Serum Factor: A Case Report and Review of Pertinent Literature

Patient: Male, 63

Final Diagnosis: Recurrent prostate cancer

Symptoms: Falsely undetectable PSA

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: Serum dilution

Specialty: Urology

Investigating the presence of human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA) in the blood of laboratory animal care workers

Background

In the present study, the researchers evaluated the presence of human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA) in a normal population and laboratory animal care providers for the first time in the world. Also, the cause of HAMA incidence in the human body through a close contact with mice was identified.

Methods

The study population consisted of 40 laboratory animal care providers aged between 24 and 57 years with a close contact with mice (e.g. taking care of mice, feeding mice, etc.) and 40 individuals of the same age as the above group with no contact with mice. HAMA was measured in both the case and control groups using sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method. Data were analyzed using SPSS 18. Univariate and multivariate linear regression and independent t-test were used. The significance of results was measured based on p < 0.05.

Results

The present study revealed that the animal care providers had (p = 000) a higher titer of HAMA (4.95 ng/mL) in their blood than the control group (1.67 ng/mL). Also, the individuals in the case group (exposed to mice) were more allergic (43.6%) than those in the control group (15%) (p = 0.003).

Conclusions

The results of this study revealed that exposure to mice in laboratory care centers can cause production of HAMA in the human body but its titer is possibly lower in Iranian working staff than those in the other parts of the world.

Prevalence and causes of abnormal PSA recovery

BACKGROUND

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test is of paramount importance as a diagnostic tool for the detection and monitoring of patients with prostate cancer. In the presence of interfering factors such as heterophilic antibodies or anti-PSA antibodies the PSA test can yield significantly falsified results. The prevalence of these factors is unknown.

METHODS

We determined the recovery of PSA concentrations diluting patient samples with a standard serum of known PSA concentration. Based on the frequency distribution of recoveries in a pre-study on 268 samples, samples with recoveries <80% or >120% were defined as suspect, re-tested and further characterized to identify the cause of interference.

RESULTS

A total of 1158 consecutive serum samples were analyzed. Four samples (0.3%) showed reproducibly disturbed recoveries of 10%, 68%, 166% and 4441%. In three samples heterophilic antibodies were identified as the probable cause, in the fourth anti-PSA-autoantibodies. The very low recovery caused by the latter interference was confirmed in serum, as well as heparin- and EDTA plasma of blood samples obtained 6 months later. Analysis by eight different immunoassays showed recoveries ranging between <10% and 80%. In a follow-up study of 212 random plasma samples we found seven samples with autoantibodies against PSA which however did not show any disturbed PSA recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

About 0.3% of PSA determinations by the electrochemiluminescence assay (ECLIA) of Roche diagnostics are disturbed by heterophilic or anti-PSA autoantibodies. Although they are rare, these interferences can cause relevant misinterpretations of a PSA test result.

Frequency-selective electrokinetic enrichment of biomolecules in physiological media based on electrical double-layer polarization

Proteomic biomarkers of interest to the early diagnosis of diseases and infections are present at trace levels versus interfering species. Hence, their selective enrichment is needed within bio-assays for speeding binding kinetics with receptors and for reducing signal interferences. While DC fields can separate biomolecules based on their electrokinetic mobilities, they are unable to selectively enrich biomarkers versus interfering species, which may possess like-charges. We present the utilization of AC electrokinetics to enable frequency-selective enrichment of nanocolloidal biomolecules, based on the characteristic time constant for polarization of their electrical double-layer, since surface conduction in their ion cloud depends on colloidal size, shape and surface charge. In this manner, using DC-offset AC fields, differences in frequency dispersion for negative dielectrophoresis are balanced against electrophoresis in a nanoslit channel to enable the selective enrichment of prostate specific antigen (PSA) versus anti-mouse immunoglobulin antibodies that cause signal interferences to immunoassays. Through coupling enrichment to capture by receptors on graphene-modified surfaces, we demonstrate the elimination of false positives caused by anti-mouse immunoglobulin antibodies to the PSA immunoassay.

Existence of a squamous cell carcinoma antigen-immunoglobulin complex causes a deviation between squamous cell carcinoma antigen concentrations determined using two different immunoassays: first report of squamous cell carcinoma antigen coupling with immunoglobulin A

Background Squamous cell carcinoma antigen is used as a tumour marker and is routinely measured in clinical laboratories. We validated two different immunoassays and found three cases in which the squamous cell carcinoma antigen concentrations deviated greatly between the two immunoassays. Here, we aimed to elucidate the mechanisms responsible for these deviations. Methods The squamous cell carcinoma antigen concentrations were determined using the ARCHITECT SCC (CLIA method) and the ST AIA-PACK SCC (FEIA method). We performed polyethylene glycol precipitation and size exclusion chromatography to assess the molecular weight and spike recovery and absorption tests to examine the presence of an autoantibody. Results Both methods exhibited good performances for the measurement of squamous cell carcinoma antigen, although a correlation test showed large differences in the squamous cell carcinoma antigen concentrations measured using the two methods in three cases. The results of polyethylene glycol treatment and size exclusion chromatography indicated the existence of a large molecular weight squamous cell carcinoma antigen in these three cases. The spike recovery tests suggested the possible presence of an autoantibody against squamous cell carcinoma antigen. Moreover, the absorption test revealed that large squamous cell carcinoma antigen complexes were formed by the association of squamous cell carcinoma antigen with IgG in two cases and with both IgG and IgA in one case. Conclusions This study describes the existence of large molecular weight squamous cell carcinoma antigen that has complexed with immunoglobulin in the serum samples. The reason for the deviations between the two immunoassays might be due to differences of their reactivities against the squamous cell carcinoma antigen immune complexes with their autoantibody. To our knowledge, this is the first report to describe the coupling of squamous cell carcinoma antigen with IgA.

Repeated spurious elevation of serum prostate-specific antigen values solved by chemiluminescence analysis: A possible interference by heterophilic antibodies

Heterophilic antibodies are human immunoglobulins directed against various animal antigens. They can produce false-positive results in the analysis of different tumor markers, including prostate-specific antigen. This interference can lead to misdiagnosis, unnecessary tests, and overtreatment in some cases. We present herein the case of a 52-year-old man with repeated spurious elevation of prostate-specific antigen, reaching levels of 108.7 ng/mL, that were suspected to be caused by heterophilic antibodies. The interference was solved by changing the analysis technique. Real values of prostate-specific antigen were less than 1 ng/mL.

Spurious elevation of serum PSA after curative treatment for prostate cancer: clinical consequences and the role of heterophilic antibodies

BACKGROUND

Various interferences can cause spurious results for common laboratory tests. Although rare, heterophilic antibodies may produce false elevations in PSA that could prompt unnecessary therapy in men previously treated for prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of small, spurious PSA elevations, and the role of heterophilic antibodies.

METHODS

Phase I: all PSA tests drawn and measured between 27 October 2008 and 26 October 2010 at Vanderbilt University Medical Center were analyzed (n=17 133). Patients who had been treated for prostate cancer with PSA values that changed from undetectable to detectable were evaluated. Phase II: patients with a detectable PSA ≤0.5 ng ml(-1) measured between 24 October 2010 and 19 January 2011 were studied prospectively (n=1288). If any patient had a previously undetectable PSA value, their serum was tested for heterophilic antibody interference.

RESULTS

Phase I: 11 men had a spuriously elevated PSA after curative treatment for prostate cancer (0.3%). Mean time to PSA elevation was 3.4±5.5 years, and mean elevation in PSA was 0.33±0.28 ng ml(-1). Each patient's PSA was undetectable after being repeated, and no patient went on to unnecessary treatment. Phase II: 10 men had a newly detectable PSA, 9 of whom had a history of prostate cancer. Each tested negative for interfering heterophilic antibodies when their PSA test was repeated with a heterophilic antibody-blocking reagent.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort, we estimate the prevalence of spuriously elevated PSA values in our population to be 0.3%. No patient with a prostate cancer history was subjected to unnecessary diagnostic evaluation or treatment. On prospective evaluation of PSA conversion to low detectable levels, no patient had evidence of interfering heterophilic antibodies. When using PSA for post-treatment surveillance, it is crucial to confirm all concerning values and consider the presence of a spurious elevation in PSA if the value does not correlate with the clinical scenario.

New onset of heterophilic antibody interference in prostate-specific antigen measurement occurring during the period of post-prostatectomy prostate-specific antigen monitoring

Laboratories evaluated whether an interference was causing a false-positive PSA for the Immulite 2000 immunoassay after a time course of increasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in a post-prostatectomy patient led to salvage therapy, which had no effect on the elevated PSA. Serial dilutions of PSA for the patient sample (6.1 ng/mL; post-prostatectomy reference range: <0.1 ng/mL [undetectable]) were linear ( r > 0.99). However, the PSA measurement was reduced to 0.1 ng/mL after pretreatment of the sample with heterophilic antibody blocking reagent. PSA was undetectable (<0.1 ng/mL) when measured using two alternative immunoassays. These results were consistent with the presence of heterophilic antibody interference for the Immulite 2000 assay. In this case, heterophilic antibody interference with PSA measurement must have originated during the period of post-prostatectomy monitoring, and the apparent progressive increases in PSA may have been due solely to the progressive increase of this heterophilic antibody assay interference. In the absence of clinical correlation, positive PSA monitoring results should always be assessed for heterophilic antibody interference for at least one time point.