Trauma triage--a comparison of the trauma score and the vital signs score

Adult prehospital scoring systems: a critical review

The goal of trauma triage is to get the right patient to the right place at the right time. In an attempt to achieve this objective numerous authors have developed a variety of prehospital triage tools. Comparative evaluation to determine which of the currently developed triage tools has the greatest predictive power has been prevented mainly because of the varying definitions of major trauma. The use of small data sets and the absence of model validation techniques have also prevented the true worth of these triage tools from being accurately determined. The aim of this article is to critically appraise the major prehospital triage tools.

The prognostic importance of serum IL-1beta, IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-alpha levels compared to trauma scoring systems for early mortality in children with blunt trauma

The purpose of the present study was to determine whether a correlation exits between the main trauma scoring systems and the activation of inflammatory cells and mediators such as interleukin-(IL-) 1beta, IL-6, IL-8 and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) after trauma, and moreover to assess if any of these can be used to predict the outcome in patients under care at a trauma center. Forty-seven children (37 boys, 10 girls) presenting with blunt trauma, were evaluated by an analysis of the relationship between overall mortality and potential risk factors. Admission data, including serum IL-1beta, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-alpha, pediatric trauma score (PTS), and injury severity score (ISS), were collected and analyzed. In descriptive statistics for independent variables, some prognostic factors such as IL-8 (P = 0.04), and ISS (P = 0.004) were significant in their relationship to mortality. In the univariate statistical analysis some other risk factors such as IL-8 (P = 0.004), >20 TNF-alpha (P = 0.04), and ISS (P = 0.007) were significant in their relationship to mortality. The relative risk of developing mortality was higher than two for each of the following risk factors: >10 ages, >25 IL-6, 10-20 TNF-alpha, >20 TNF-alpha, PTS <or= 8, and ISS > 15. There was a positive correlation between IL-8 (r = 0.31, P = 0.33), ISS (r = 0.31, P = 0.0001), and mortality. There was also a correlation with ISS and IL-8 (r = 0.32, P = 0.02). ISS, and the serum IL-8 level are the most important determinants of clinical outcome in critically injured patients. A correlation exits between IL-8 and mortality and between ISS and IL-8.

Admission lactate level and the APACHE II score are the most useful predictors of prognosis following torso trauma

BACKGROUND

Markers of dysoxic metabolism and scoring systems for triage have been widely used in critically injured patients. However, so far, no model is sufficiently reliable to predict the outcome in trauma victims. The purposes of the present study, therefore, were to determine whether a correlation exits between the main trauma scoring systems and the markers of dysoxic metabolism. Moreover, to assess if any of the admission parameters can be used to indicate outcome.

METHODS

Sixty-four patients were included in this study. Admission data, including arterial lactate level, base deficit (BD), pH, revised trauma score (RTS), injury severity score (ISS), shock index (SI), and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II), were collected and analysed by logistic regression analysis. Degree of association between continuous variables were calculated by either Pearson's or Spearman's correlation coefficient, where applicable. The dependence of lactate on two or more other variables was evaluated by multiple linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

Logistic regression analysis showed that the fatal outcome following major torso trauma was principally associated with the APACHE II score and lactate. The specificity and the sensitivity of this logistic regression model was 94.6 and 79.2%, respectively. According to standardised linear regression coefficients, BD was the best single predictor of lactate, and APACHE II added a small amount of predictive power. The proportion of total variation in lactate level explained by base deficit, APACHE II and age is R2=85.2%.

CONCLUSION

APACHE II score and the arterial lactate level are the most important determinants of clinical outcome in critically injured patients. A correlation exits between lactate and APACHE II and between lactate and base deficit.

Incremental benefit of individual American College of Surgeons trauma triage criteria

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incremental benefit of individual American College of Surgeons (ACS) trauma triage criteria for prediction of severe injuries after consideration of concurrent physiologic, anatomic, mechanism, or "other" criteria.

METHODS

A prospective cross-sectional study of motor vehicle crash victims transported to any of the 12 hospitals in a suburban/rural county by local ambulance services was performed. Demographic and individual ACS criteria were collected using structured data instruments. EDs provided patient disposition within 24 hours of patient arrival. Medical records were reviewed. Major outcomes were admission, operative interventions (OR), major nonorthopedic operative interventions or death (Maj-OR), and injury severity score (ISS). To optimize sensitivity and specificity of out-of-hospital triage decision rules, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were derived.

RESULTS

Of 1,545 patients, 13% were admitted; 6% had OR; 1% had Maj-OR; and 3% had ISSs > or = 16. For all outcomes, the most useful criteria were physiologic and anatomic. Some additional criteria (crash speed > 20 mph, > or = 30-inch vehicle deformity, axle displacement) substantially worsened specificity, with minimal or no improvement in sensitivity. For example, the optimal ROC curve for Maj-OR was determined by a systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score < 13, respiratory rate (RR) < 10 or > 29, death of a same-car occupant, penetrating injury, and/or > or = 24-inch opposite-side compartment intrusion (sensitivity, 85%; specificity, 87%). An ISS > or = 16 was predicted by GCS score < 13, RR < 10 or > 29, penetrating injury, 2 proximal long bone fractures, flail chest, > or = 24-inch opposite-side compartment intrusion, patient ejection, rollover, and/or age < 5 or > 55 years (sensitivity, 86%; specificity, 70%).

CONCLUSION

Physiologic and anatomic trauma triage criteria predicted increased hospital resource utilization and severe injury. On the other hand, when used concurrently with physiologic, anatomic, and "other" criteria, some mechanism criteria worsen specificity with negligible improvement in sensitivity. In particular, crash speed > 20 mph and > or = 30-inch vehicle deformity had little predictive value for all outcomes.

Predictive validity and internal consistency of the pre-hospital index measured on-site by physicians

Physiological measures of injury are used as triage tools to identify patients that require treatment in trauma centres. The Pre-Hospital Index (PHI) is based on systolic blood pressure, pulse, respiratory rate, (level of) consciousness, and presence of penetrating injury. The present study evaluated the validity and internal consistency of the PHI. The study was based on 628 patients assessed by physicians at the scene. Mean age was 38.7 years (SD = 24.8), and 65% were male. Motor vehicle collisions caused the injury for 45%. The majority had head/neck (56%) and extremity (45%) injuries. Mean PHI was 4.62 (SD = 5.77), 40% had a PHI of zero, 6% between 1 and 3, 32% between 4 and 7, and 21% greater than 7. The associations between PHI and rates of hospital admission, surgery, ICU treatment, mortality, duration of hospitalization, and length of ICU stay were significant (p < 0.001). A total of 260 (41.4%) patients had major trauma requiring treatment at a trauma centre. A PHI > 3 had 83% sensitivity and 67% specificity for identifying these patients. Internal consistency of the PHI variables was above the acceptable limits. This study has shown that the PHI is a valid and reliable physiological measure of injury severity and field triage tool.

Evaluation of American College of Surgeons trauma triage criteria in a suburban and rural setting

In suburban and rural counties, patient transport to specialized facilities such as trauma centers may result in prolonged transport times with the resultant loss of ambulance coverage in the primary service area. We evaluated the American College of Surgeons trauma triage criteria as modified by New York State to determine the ability of these criteria to predict the need for trauma center care in victims of blunt traumatic injury. Blunt trauma patients were retrospectively identified through review of patient care reports for the presence either of mechanism or of physiological criteria for transport to a trauma center. Controls were randomly selected from patients with blunt trauma not meeting any of the criteria. Main outcome parameters were the emergency department (ED) disposition, length of hospital stay, need for intensive care unit (ICU) care, and major nonorthopedic operative interventions. There were 857 patients enrolled. The presence either of mechanism or of physiological criteria increased the likelihood of hospital admission (control, 11%; mechanism, 35%; and physiological, 33%). Relative to patients without any criteria, the presence of mechanism criteria alone did not identify patients who required a prolonged length of stay (67% vs 71%), intensive care unit services (13% vs 19%) or major nonorthopedic operative interventions (0.2% vs 1.6%). The presence of physiological criteria increased the likelihood of requiring all of these services. These comparisons held true for victims of motor vehicle accidents, pedestrians struck by motor vehicles, and people who fell from heights above ground level. Patients with physiologic criteria may benefit from transport directly to a trauma center. Because of the low need for operative intervention and ICU services, patients with no criteria or mechanism criteria at long distances from a trauma center may be initially evaluated at the closest hospital and transferred to a trauma center if hospitalization or ICU care is necessary. Further study to determine the predictive value of certain individual mechanism criteria is warranted.

Trauma audit and quality improvement

Audit is the evaluation of patient care. The care of the injured patient commences at the accident scene and involves prehospital triage and management, emergency hospital assessment and resuscitation, diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, operative surgery, intensive care unit management, acute hospital care and rehabilitation. Audit assesses the delivery of trauma care and clinical management and through identification of inadequacies facilitates the introduction of appropriate improvements. Both the American National Academy of Sciences--National Research Council and the Australian National Health & Medical Research Council have recommended the establishment of an audit process to evaluate the quality of trauma management and to obtain quality assurance. They have advised that this process would be assisted by the development of regional trauma registries and a uniform approach to the grading of injuries. Reduction in the preventable death rate, frequency of complications and duration of hospitalization has followed audits as a result of changes in the organization and quality of trauma care. In the United States, for example, the preventable death rate after injury was reduced from 35 to 15% in Orange County, California and from 14 to 3% in San Diego County, California. Studies from Great Britain. The Netherlands, Canada, Australia and elsewhere have further supported the view that trauma audit modifies practice leading to reductions in mortality and morbidity.

Comparison of APACHE II, Trauma Score, and Injury Severity Score as predictors of outcome in critically injured trauma patients

Trauma Score (TS), APACHE II score, and Injury Severity Score (ISS) have been utilized to quantitate severity of illness in various groups of patients. The purpose of this study was to compare the relationship of the APACHE II score, TS, and "computer-derived" ISS with outcome in critically injured trauma patients. Data were recorded prospectively in a computer database for 428 consecutive trauma admissions. Stepwise discriminate analysis was utilized to determine the best predictor of both intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital outcome. Forty-two patients died in the ICU (10%), and another 18 patients died after leaving the ICU (4%), for a total mortality rate of 14%. The mean p value and partial R2 value obtained from stepwise discriminant analysis of the relationships between APACHE II score, TS, and ISS to ICU and hospital survival are shown. APACHE II score was the best predictor of both ICU and hospital outcome in these critically ill trauma patients. However, when combining all three measures (APACHE II score, TS, and ISS), only a portion of the variance in outcome is explained by the scores (R2 < 0.05). We conclude that scoring systems for outcome prediction should be utilized only as an adjunct to clinical assessment in the evaluation of the severity of illness and mortality risk in critically ill trauma patients.

The management of injuries--a review of deaths in hospital

A prospective review was undertaken of the management of 111 consecutive patients who died in hospital after admission for treatment of injuries. A standard set of data relating to each patient was reviewed by each member of a trauma death audit committee and then by the whole committee. Autopsy reports were available on all patients. Conclusions were drawn concerning defective aspects of patient management and possible avoidance of each death. Injury severity was assessed using the Trauma Score (TS) and Injury Severity Score (ISS). The possibly avoidable death (PAD) rate was 17%. The most common defects in management were related to inadequate fluid resuscitation and delays in definitive management. The greatest contributions to the PAD rate were from inadequate fluid resuscitation, delays and inadequate perception of the severity of injuries or significance of clinical deterioration. Increasing age was related to a higher frequency of PAD. PAD rate in the presence of severe head injury was 8%, but was 63% in the absence of a severe head injury. It is concluded that review of all trauma deaths is an achievable, beneficial and essential part of a hospital-based integrated trauma service. TS and ISS are not sufficiently sensitive to justify their use in selecting deaths for review. Improved blood volume replacement, earlier and more direct management and supervision by senior specialist staff, and elimination of causes of delay in patient management should all decrease the death rate from injuries particularly in patients without severe head injury.

Paediatric trauma: urban epidemiology and an analysis of methods for assessing the severity of trauma in 598 injured children

This study is based on a 12 month prospective analysis of 598 paediatric trauma admissions, drawn principally from an urban environment. The spectrum of trauma is described, highlighting the minor nature of most injuries and the rarity of penetrating trauma. A subgroup of seriously injured children was identified and further analysed. All deaths were examined. The predictive value of the Trauma Score (TS) and Method of Injury (MOI) were assessed in terms of eventual injury severity using the Injury Severity Score (ISS), and morbid outcome. Most of the patients were not seriously injured, and sustained single system injury only. The injuries were related principally to falls (62%). Seventy-nine children (13%) were identified as seriously injured (ISS greater than or equal to 16). In this group pedestrian injuries were the major cause of injury (29%). Amongst seriously injured children, cranial injury was identified in 91%, followed by abdominal injury in 33%. There were nine deaths in the series, representing 1.5% of all paediatric trauma admissions, and 11% of seriously injured patients. All deaths were associated with a significant head injury. Although the TS had a specificity of 99% in predicting serious injury and a positive predictive value of 94%, its sensitivity was only 26%. The MOI was associated with an overtriage rate of 200%. Of children admitted following pedal cycle accidents, 86% of the total and 91% of seriously injured children were not wearing a helmet. Of passengers in a motor car, 37% of the total number were unrestrained. The results suggest triage in children requires more than a physiological measure (TS) or MOI.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)