National Cholesterol Education Program and International Diabetes Federation definitions of metabolic syndrome in the prediction of diabetes. Results from the FIrenze-Bagno A Ripoli study

Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone Monotherapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

Pioglitazone, the only thiazolidinedione drug in clinical practice is under scrutiny due to reported adverse effects, it's unique insulin sensitising action provides rationale to remain as a therapeutic option for managing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing pioglitazone monotherapy with monotherapies of other oral antidiabetic drugs for assessing its efficacy and safety in T2DM patients. Mean changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), and mean changes in fasting blood sugar (FBS) level, body weight (BW) and homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) were primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. Safety outcomes were changes in lipid parameters, blood pressure and incidences of adverse events. Metafor package of R software and RevMan software based on random-effects model were used for analyses. We included 16 randomised controlled trials. Pioglitazone monotherapy showed equivalent efficacy as comparators in reducing HbA1c by 0.05% (95% CI: -0.21 to 0.11) and greater efficacy in reducing FBS level by 0.24 mmol/l (95% CI: -0.48 to -0.01). Pioglitazone showed similar efficacy as comparators in reducing HOMA-IR (WMD: 0.05, 95% CI: -0.49 to 0.59) and increasing high-density lipoprotein level (WMD: 0.02 mmol/l, 95% CI: -0.06 to 0.10). Improved blood pressure (WMD: -1.05 mmHg, 95% CI: -4.29 to 2.19) and triglycerides level (WMD: -0.71 mmol/l, 95% CI: -1.70 to 0.28) were also observed with pioglitazone monotherapy. There was a significant association of pioglitazone with increased BW (WMD: 2.06 kg, 95% CI: 1.11 to 3.01) and risk of oedema (RR: 2.21, 95% CI: 1.48 to 3.31), though the risk of hypoglycaemia was absolutely lower (RR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.80). Meta-analysis supported pioglitazone as an effective treatment option for T2DM patients to ameliorate hyperglycaemia, adverse lipid metabolism and blood pressure. Pioglitazone is suggested to prescribe following individual patient's needs. It can be a choice of drug for insulin resistant T2DM patients having dyslipidaemia, hypertension or history of cardiovascular disease.

Treating Diabetes in Patients with Heart Failure: Moving from Risk to Benefit

Over the past two decades, therapeutics for diabetes have evolved from drugs with known heart failure risk to classes with potential benefit for patients with heart failure. As many as 25 to 35 % of patients with heart failure carry a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Therefore, newer drug classes including dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GIP-1) agonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors are being examined for cardiovascular safety as well as their effects on left ventricular function, quality of life, and other measures of disease progression. The purpose of this review is to summarize the existing evidence on these classes of anti-diabetic agents in patients with heart failure.

Diabetes management in older people: a focus on cardiovascular risk reduction

Cardiovascular disease remains the most common cause of death in persons with diabetes regardless of age. Increasing age combined with diabetes exert a synergistic effect on the vascular system increasing the atherosclerosis burden in older people with diabetes. Due to their high baseline risk, they stand to benefit most from interventions to reduce cardiovascular risk. Older people with diabetes are functionally heterogeneous and their management is challenging. Fit and independent individuals are likely to benefit from tight targets while a relaxed approach putting quality of life at the heart of management plans is more appropriate in the frail and dependent individuals with limited life expectancy.

Cardiovascular effects of anti-diabetes drugs

INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular disease remains the major contributor to morbidity and mortality in diabetes. From the need to reduce cardiovascular risk in diabetes and to ensure that such risk is not exacerbated by drug treatments, governmental regulators and drug manufacturers have focused on clinical trials evaluating cardiovascular outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

Findings from mechanistic and clinical trials of biguanides, sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors will be reviewed. These drug classes will be compared within the context of available cardiovascular outcomes data. Clinical implications of new study regulations will be examined.

EXPERT OPINION

Recent cardiovascular studies provide a more comprehensive evaluation of specific anti-diabetes therapy in individuals with high cardiovascular risk. Long-term effects of anti-hyperglycemic agents in patients with lower cardiovascular risk are still speculative. Historical data supports continued use of metformin as a first-line agent. DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists appear to have neutral effects on cardiovascular outcomes. The significantly decreased cardiovascular risk associated with empagliflozin SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy is impressive and may change how practitioners prescribe add-on therapy to metformin.

Drug therapies for HIV-related metabolic disorders

INTRODUCTION

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) has become a chronic disease often associated with dyslipidaemia and insulin resistance. Combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) may contribute to metabolic disturbances, eventually leading to increased cardiovascular disease (CVR) in this population. Escalating interventions to decrease CVR include promoting a healthy lifestyle, such as quitting smoking, diet and regular exercise. If they do not achieve the goals, a change of cART should be considered, followed by or used concomitantly with the use of chemical therapies.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this article is to review the available drug therapies for the treatment of metabolic disorders in HIV-infected patients and to examine their safety and effectiveness in this population. A review of the literature was conducted, highlighting the most relevant articles.

EXPERT OPINION

Switching strategies can be useful but its expected benefit is not high. Therefore, chemical intervention is often needed. Statins have been proven to reduce CVR in the general population and in HIV-infected patients. Simvastatin is contraindicated in patients treated with boosted PI due to interactions; atorvastatin is safe at submaximal dose and needs close monitoring, while pravastatin lacks lipid-lowering potency, and rosuvastatin and pitavastatin are safe. Ezetimibe and fibrates are also safe and effective in HIV-infected patients and can be used in combination with statins. The management of glucose homeostatic disorders in HIV-infected patients follows the same guidelines as in the general population. However, there are specific considerations with respect to the interactions of particular medications with cART. When drug therapy is needed, metformin is the first-line drug. Decisions regarding second- and third-line drugs should be carefully individualized.

Pharmacokinetics and clinical evaluation of the alogliptin plus pioglitazone combination for type 2 diabetes

INTRODUCTION

Type 2 diabetes is a complex disease with multiple defects, which generally requires a combination of several pharmacological approaches to reach glucose control targets. A unique fixed-dose combination combines a thiazolidinedione (pioglitazone) and a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (alogliptin).

AREA COVERED

An extensive literature search was performed to analyze the pharmacokinetics of pioglitazone and alogliptin when used separately and in combination as well as to summarize clinical and toxicological considerations about the combined therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Pioglitazone, a potent insulin sensitizer, and alogliptin, an incretin-based agent that potentiates post-meal insulin secretion and reduces glucagon secretion, have complementary mechanisms of action. The clinical efficacy of a combined therapy is superior to any single therapy in patients treated with diet or with metformin (with or without sulphonylurea). These two drugs can be administered once daily, with or without a meal. No clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions between the two agents have been described and the fixed-dose combination has shown bioequivalence with alogliptin and pioglitazone given separately. Combining alogliptin with pioglitazone does not alter the safety profile of each compound. Weight gain observed with pioglitazone may be limited with the addition of alogliptin. The concern of an increased risk of heart failure remains to be better investigated.

Regardless of central obesity, metabolic syndrome is a significant predictor of type 2 diabetes in Japanese Americans

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

The impact of metabolic syndrome (MetS) on the development of type 2 diabetes has been reported in different ethnic populations. However, whether central obesity is an essential component as a diagnostic criterion for MetS remains a controversial topic. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between MetS and the incidence of type 2 diabetes with or without central obesity in a Japanese American population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined whether MetS predicts incident type 2 diabetes among 928 Japanese American participants who did not have diabetes enrolled in an ongoing medical survey between 1992 and 2007. MetS was defined on the basis of American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute criteria. The average follow-up period was approximately 6.8 years.

RESULTS

During the follow-up period, 116 new cases of diabetes were diagnosed. Compared to the participants without MetS, the hazard ratio (HR) for incident type 2 diabetes was significantly higher in participants with MetS, after adjustment for sex, age and impaired glucose tolerance (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.11-2.42). The risk of type 2 diabetes was found to be significantly higher in participants with MetS but without central obesity (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.25-3.41), as well as in participants with MetS and with central obesity (HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.51-4.01) than in participants with neither MetS nor central obesity, after adjustment for sex, age and impaired glucose tolerance.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that the presence of MetS, with or without central obesity, could independently predict the development of type 2 diabetes in Japanese Americans.

The concomitant use of second-generation antipsychotics and long-term antiretroviral therapy may be associated with increased cardiovascular risk

To study the effect of concurrent use of second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) on metabolic syndrome (MetS) components conferring increased cardiovascular risk in a sample of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected adults taking antiretroviral therapy (ART). A retrospective study of participants consecutively recruited at the UCSD HIV Neurobehavioral Research Program examined effects of combined ART and SGAs on body mass index (BMI), nonfasting serum lipids, diabetes mellitus (DM) incidence, and mean arterial pressure (MAP). Metabolic outcome variables and covariates were compared using t-tests, Chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests. Linear and logistic multivariable models explored metabolic outcomes for participants taking (SGA+) or not taking (SGA-) concomitant SGAs, after controlling for demographic and HIV disease- and ART-related covariates. Of 2229 HIV-infected participants, 12% (N=258) were treated with SGAs. In multivariable models adjusted for relevant covariates, the SGA+ group had significantly higher mean triglycerides, significantly higher odds of DM, significantly higher MAPs and marginally higher BMI. The use of SGAs in HIV-infected adults taking ART was independently associated with worse indicators of MetS and cardiovascular risk. Aggressive monitoring for the metabolic complications from concurrent SGA and ART is indicated in all patients receiving these medication combinations.

Improvement of insulin sensitivity by a novel drug candidate, BGP-15, in different animal studies

BACKGROUND

Insulin resistance has been recognized as the most significant predictor of further development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Here we investigated the effect of a heat shock protein (HSP) co-inducer, BGP-15, on insulin sensitivity in different insulin-resistant animal models and compared its effect with insulin secretagogues and insulin sensitizers.

METHODS

Insulin sensitivity was assessed by the hyperinsulinemic euglycemic glucose clamp technique in normal and cholesterol-fed rabbits and in healthy Wistar and Goto-Kakizaki (GK) rats in dose-ranging studies. We also examined the effect of BGP-15 on streptozotocin-induced changes in the vasorelaxation of the aorta in Sprague-Dawley rats.

RESULTS

BGP-15 doses of 10 and 30 mg/kg increased insulin sensitivity by 50% and 70%, respectively, in cholesterol-fed but not in normal rabbits. After 5 days of treatment with BGP-15, the glucose infusion rate was increased in a dose-dependent manner in genetically insulin-resistant GK rats. The most effective dose was 20 mg/kg, which showed a 71% increase in insulin sensitivity compared to control group. Administration of BGP-15 protected against streptozotocin-induced changes in vasorelaxation, which was similar to the effect of rosiglitazone.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that the insulin-sensitizing effect of BGP-15 is comparable to conventional insulin sensitizers. This might be of clinical utility in the treatment of T2DM.

Effect of pioglitazone versus metformin on cardiovascular risk markers in type 2 diabetes

INTRODUCTION

Besides its critical role in metabolic homeostasis, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-γ modulates several cellular responses involved in atherothrombosis. This multicenter, double-blind, randomized study investigated the effects of two oral hypoglycemic agents on markers of inflammation, platelet activation, thrombogenesis, and oxidative stress in patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effect on C-reactive protein (CRP) after a 16-week treatment period with either pioglitazone or metformin. Additionally, markers of vascular inflammatory response, platelet activation, thrombogenesis, oxidative stress, glucose, and lipid metabolism, as well as liver function, were measured. In total, 50 patients completed the study. Pioglitazone-treated patients were found to have statistically significantly larger decreases in mean CRP levels (-0.4 mg/dL) compared to those treated with metformin (-0.2 mg/dL) (P=0.04), as well as greater reductions in levels of mean fasting plasma glucose (-27 vs. -9 mg/dL; P=0.01), serum insulin (-2 vs. -1.9 mU/L; P=0.014), homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) (-1.2 vs. -0.9; P=0.015), and E-selectin (-12.4 vs. +3.4 μg/mL; P=0.01). Mean glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels decreased in both treatment groups from baseline to week 16 (-0.4% in the pioglitazone group, -0.2% in the metformin group; P=0.36). Pioglitazone treatment was also found to be associated with a statistically significant increase in total cholesterol levels (+10 mg/dL in the pioglitazone arm, -3 mg/dL in the metformin arm; P=0.05) and a decrease in liver enzyme levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The favorable changes in markers of systemic and vascular inflammatory response with pioglitazone suggest that it may positively influence the atherothrombotic process in type 2 diabetes.

Effects on lipid profile of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, pioglitazone, acarbose, and sulfonylureas: meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

Lipid profile is an important determinant of cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes. It is well known that patients with type 2 diabetes are more likely to be dyslipidemic than the general population. Given the observed connection between glucose and lipid metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes, it is conceivable that different glucose-lowering agents can have a varying impact on the lipid profile. When metformin monotherapy fails, other drugs can be added to achieve sufficient glycemic control. Available oral agents include pioglitazone, acarbose, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, and insulin secretagogs. The present meta-analysis was designed to assess the effect of DPP-4 inhibitors, pioglitazone, insulin secretagogs, and acarbose on blood lipids when compared to placebo.

METHODS

An extensive search (any date up to November 1, 2011) was performed for all trials performed on the following classes of drugs: gliptin, insulin secretagogs, pioglitazone, and acarbose. The following endpoints were considered: endpoint total, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglycerides.

RESULTS

The difference in mean total cholesterol values at endpoint versus baseline was significantly higher in patients on pioglitazone, sulfonylureas, and DPP-4 inhibitor treatment (but not on acarbose) than those on placebo, demonstrating that treatment with these drugs (except acarbose) is associated with a significant reduction in total cholesterol. With respect to triglycerides, a significant reduction could be observed with acarbose, pioglitazone, and DPP-4 inhibitors, but not with sulfonylureas. HDL-C appeared to be increased by treatment with acarbose and pioglitazone, and decreased by sulfonylureas.

CONCLUSION

The present meta-analysis shows that available glucose-lowering drugs may have varying effects on the lipid profile. DPP-4 inhibitors, acarbose, and pioglitazone seem to have a more favorable effect on the lipid profile than sulfonylureas.

Thiazolidinediones and risk of heart failure in patients with or at high risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis of placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Recent meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) demonstrated a higher risk of heart failure (HF) with the use of thiazolidinediones (TZDs). However, this effect may have been diluted by including active controls. Also, it is uncertain whether the risk of HF is similar with rosiglitazone and pioglitazone.

OBJECTIVES

This study quantified the risks of HF with the use of TZDs in patients with or at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), and evaluated differential effects by type of TZD. Secondarily, we evaluated risks of peripheral edema.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo-controlled RCTs evaluating the effect of rosiglitazone or pioglitazone on investigator-reported HF and edema. Articles published before 31 December 2009 were searched in MEDLINE, The Web of Science, and Scopus, and the data were extracted by three investigators. RCTs with ≥100 patients and ≥3 months of follow-up were included. We quantified the effect of TZDs as odds ratios (ORs) by using the Mantel-Haenzel and alternative models. We further evaluated the risk of serious/severe HF, and the effect of several trial characteristics on HF risk by subgroup analysis and meta-regression analysis.

RESULTS

29 trials (n = 20 254) were evaluated. TZDs were significantly associated with HF (TZD 360/6807 [5.3%] vs placebo 234/6328 [3.7%], OR 1.59; 95% CI 1.34, 1.89; p < 0.00001). The risk of HF was higher with rosiglitazone than with pioglitazone (2.73 [95% CI 1.46, 5.10] vs 1.51 [1.26, 1.81]; p = 0.06). TZDs were associated with a similar risk of serious/severe HF (OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.16, 1.87; p = 0.002). Use of TZDs was also associated with edema (OR 2.04; 95% CI 1.85, 2.26; p < 0.00001). HF and edema risks were consistent using Peto and random effects models. Risks of HF were significantly high for the subgroups of trials including patients with or at high risk for type 2 DM, and for the subgroup of trials with ≥12 months of follow-up. Meta-regression analysis showed that trials with lower overall baseline risk had higher HF risks.

CONCLUSION

In placebo-controlled trials of adult patients with or at high risk for type 2 DM, TZD therapy is significantly and consistently associated with a higher risk of HF. The risk of serious/severe HF is also increased with the use of TZDs. HF risks are similar to those of meta-analyses combining active- and placebo-controlled trials. The benefit/risk profile of TZDs should be considered when treating diabetic patients with or without prior HF.

The metabolic syndrome and risk of chronic kidney disease: pathophysiology and intervention strategies

Metabolic syndrome is characterized by a clustering of cardiovascular risk factors, including abdominal obesity, elevated blood pressure and glucose concentrations, and dyslipidemia. The presence of this clinical entity is becoming more pervasive throughout the globe as the prevalence of obesity increases worldwide. Moreover, there is increased recognition of the complications and mortality related to this syndrome. This paper looks to examine the link between metabolic syndrome and the development of chronic kidney disease.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ and the endothelium: implications in cardiovascular disease

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors-γ (PPARγs) are ligand-activated transcription factors that play a crucial regulatory role in the transcription of a large number of genes involved in lipid metabolism and inflammation. In addition to physiological ligands, synthetic ligands (the thiazoledinediones) have been developed. In spite of the much publicized adverse cardiovascular effects of one such thiazoledinedione (rosiglitazone), PPARγ activation may have beneficial cardiovascular effects. In this article we review the effects of PPARγ activation on the endothelium with special emphasis on the possible implications in cardiovascular disease. We discuss its possible role in inflammation, vasomotor function, thrombosis, angiogenesis, vascular aging and vascular rhythm. We also briefly review the clinical implications of these lines of research.

Pioglitazone limits myocardial infarct size, activates Akt, and upregulates cPLA2 and COX-2 in a PPAR-γ-independent manner

Pioglitazone (PIO), a PPAR-γ agonist, limits myocardial infarct size by activating Akt and upregulating cytosolic phospholipase A(2) (cPLA(2)) and cyclooxygenase (COX)-2. However, PIO has several PPAR-γ-independent effects. We assessed whether PIO limits myocardial infarct size in PPAR-γ-knockout mice, attenuates hypoxia-reoxygenation injury and upregulates P-Akt, cPLA(2), and COX-2 expression in PPAR-γ-knockout cardiomyocytes. Cardiac-specific inducible PPAR-γ knockout mice were generated by crossing αMHC-Cre mice to PPAR-γ(loxp/loxp) mice. PPAR-γ deletion was achieved after 7 days of intraperitoneal tamoxifen (20 mg/kg/day) administration. Mice received PIO (10 mg/kg/day), or vehicle, for 3 days and underwent coronary occlusion (30 min) followed by reperfusion (4 h). We assessed the area at risk by blue dye and infarct size by TTC. Cultured adult cardiomyocytes of PPAR-γ(loxp/loxp/cre) mice without or with pretreatment with tamoxifen were incubated with or without PIO and subjected to 2 h hypoxia/2 h reoxygenation. Cardiac-specific PPAR-γ knockout significantly increased infarct size. PIO reduced infarct size by 51% in PPAR-γ knockout mice and by 55% in mice with intact PPAR-γ. Deleting the PPAR-γ gene increased cell death in vitro. PIO reduced cell death in cells with and without intact PPAR-γ. PIO similarly increased myocardial Ser-473 P-Akt, cPLA(2), and COX-2 levels after hypoxia/reoxygenation in cells with and without intact PPAR-γ. PIO limited infarct size in mice in a PPAR-γ-independent manner. PIO activated Akt, increased the expression of cPLA(2) and COX-2, and protected adult cardiomyocytes against the effects of hypoxia/reoxygenation independent of PPAR-γ activation.

Association between HTR2C polymorphisms and metabolic syndrome in patients with schizophrenia treated with atypical antipsychotics

BACKGROUND

Previous research indicates that common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the serotonin 5-HT2C receptor gene (HTR2C) are associated with metabolic syndrome (MetS) related to antipsychotic treatment. This study analyzes a large sample of patients with schizophrenia treated with atypical antipsychotics to determine whether variation in the HTR2C is associated with MetS.

METHODS

Six tag SNPs, capturing all common genetic variations in the HTR2C gene in the Han population, were genotyped in 456 Chinese schizophrenic inpatients treated with atypical antipsychotics (clozapine: 171, olanzapine: 91, and risperidone: 194).

RESULTS

Single-marker based analysis shows that of the six HTR2C SNPs, the rs498177 SNP showed a significant association with MetS in female patients, and the C allele was associated with an increased risk of MetS (for genotype TT/TC/CC: MetS vs. non-MetS=50%/27%/23% vs. 69%/28%/3%, and for allele T/C: MetS vs. non-MetS=63%/37% vs. 83%/17%, p=0.0007). Haplotype analysis shows that the A-C type of rs521018-rs498177 in the HTR2C gene significantly decreased the risk of MetS (corrected p=0.0108) in female patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study support the role of HTR2C genetic variants in susceptibility to MetS in patients treated with atypical antipsychotics. However, this association is gender-dependent.

Effect of pioglitazone on systemic inflammation is independent of metabolic control and cardiac autonomic function in patients with type 2 diabetes

The aim of this article is to investigate the relation of the anti-inflammatory effect of pioglitazone with cardiac autonomic function and metabolic control in diabetic patients. In this prospective open label trial, 36 type 2 diabetic patients (age 60 ± 10, 20 M) without overt cardiovascular disease were randomized to add pioglitazone (30 mg) to their therapy or to continue standard therapy. C-reactive protein (CRP) serum levels, metabolic parameters and cardiac autonomic function (assessed by heart rate variability [HRV] on 24-h ECG Holter monitoring) were measured at baseline and after 3 months. Clinical and laboratory variables were similar in the two groups. No significant changes were observed after 3 months for metabolic and anthropometric parameters, except for a mild increase in HDL levels in the pioglitazone group only (P = 0.04 vs. controls). CRP levels decreased significantly at follow-up in the pioglitazone group (3.2 ± 1.97 vs. 2.37 ± 1.56 mg/l) but not in the control group (3.0 ± 1.92 vs. 3.93 ± 2.14 mg/l; P = 0.003). No differences were found in basal and follow-up HRV variables between the two groups. In type 2 diabetic patients pioglitazone exerts favourable effects on inflammation even after short-term therapy. This effect precedes those on metabolic and anthropometric parameters and is not associated with changes in cardiac autonomic function.

Pioglitazone in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: safety and efficacy review

The increase in obesity and the aging of the population has lead to an increase in the incidence of type 2 diabetes. This has led to the development of new drugs such as thiazolidinediones (TZDs) which are Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor (PPARgamma) agonists, to treat type 2 diabetes. TZDs have recently been at the center of a controversy with regards to their cardiovascular safety. Pioglitazone is a TZD which has been shown to be effective in glycemic control by lowering insulin resistance. Pioglitazone also has beneficial effects on lipid metabolism and cardiovascular risk. The safety and efficacy of pioglitazone including its pleotropic effects are discussed at length in this article.

Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease: Is intensive glucose control beneficial or deadly? Lessons from ACCORD, ADVANCE, VADT, UKPDS, PROactive, and NICE-SUGAR

Type 2 diabetes is a rather complex metabolic disorder still associated with a 2-fold increased cardiovascular (CV) mortality despite a dramatic improvement in CV risk reduction by multifactorial intervention strategies. Intensive glucose control can also reduce CV morbidity, but this effect seems to be limited to younger patients with shorter duration of disease and no CV disease. Intensive glucose control--in particular when complex insulin strategies are used--is associated with a 5-fold increased risk for severe hypoglycemia, which could induce harm in some patients. In contrast to blood pressure and lipid-lowering interventions a reduction of CV mortality cannot be seen before 10-20 years after the start of the glucose-lowering intervention (metabolic memory, legacy effect). Future ongoing outcome studies in more than 50,000 patients will clarify whether new antidiabetic drugs--not inducing hypoglycemia or weight gain--will further improve the prognosis of T2DM patients.

Pioglitazone, vitamin E, or placebo for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

BACKGROUND

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is a common liver disease that can progress to cirrhosis. Currently, there is no established treatment for this disease.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 247 adults with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and without diabetes to receive pioglitazone at a dose of 30 mg daily (80 subjects), vitamin E at a dose of 800 IU daily (84 subjects), or placebo (83 subjects), for 96 weeks. The primary outcome was an improvement in histologic features of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, as assessed with the use of a composite of standardized scores for steatosis, lobular inflammation, hepatocellular ballooning, and fibrosis. Given the two planned primary comparisons, P values of less than 0.025 were considered to indicate statistical significance.

RESULTS

Vitamin E therapy, as compared with placebo, was associated with a significantly higher rate of improvement in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (43% vs. 19%, P=0.001), but the difference in the rate of improvement with pioglitazone as compared with placebo was not significant (34% and 19%, respectively; P=0.04). Serum alanine and aspartate aminotransferase levels were reduced with vitamin E and with pioglitazone, as compared with placebo (P<0.001 for both comparisons), and both agents were associated with reductions in hepatic steatosis (P=0.005 for vitamin E and P<0.001 for pioglitazone) and lobular inflammation (P=0.02 for vitamin E and P=0.004 for pioglitazone) but not with improvement in fibrosis scores (P=0.24 for vitamin E and P=0.12 for pioglitazone). Subjects who received pioglitazone gained more weight than did those who received vitamin E or placebo; the rates of other side effects were similar among the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Vitamin E was superior to placebo for the treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in adults without diabetes. There was no benefit of pioglitazone over placebo for the primary outcome; however, significant benefits of pioglitazone were observed for some of the secondary outcomes. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00063622.)

Clinical evaluation of combined therapy for type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Therapeutic guidelines recommend the combination of drugs as necessary to control type 2 diabetes (T2D). This research assessed the effectiveness of pioglitazone (Pio), metformin (Met) and sulfonylurea (SU) combinations in the routine clinical practice.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A nationwide, 12-month prospective, observational cohort study was performed in 2294 patients with T2D (50.3% females, mean age: 61.1 years, mean body mass index: 30.2 kg/m(2), mean time since diagnosis: 8.5 years) who started, at the discretion of treating physician, oral antihyperglycaemic treatment with either Pio + SU, Pio + Met or SU + Met because of inadequate control with previous therapy. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycohaemoglobin (HbA1c), lipids, blood pressure, and anthropometric parameters were measured, and 10-year cardiovascular risk was estimated.

RESULTS

FPG, HbA1c and total cholesterol at baseline had mean values (184.6 mg/dl, 8.5% and 246.0 mg/dl, respectively) associated with an excess of micro- and macrovascular risk. The mean changes from baseline in the Pio + SU, Pio + Met and SU + Met cohorts were, respectively, -37.9, -32.7 and -25.8 mg/dl for FPG; -1.1, -1.0 and -0.7% for HbA1c; -30.7, -38.7 and -17.1 mg/dl for triglycerides; and +2.3, +2.5 and +0.6 mg/dl for HDL cholesterol. In consequence, the estimated 10-year cardiovascular risk decreased more in the Pio cohorts, particularly with Pio + Met (1.7% versus 1.4% Pio + SU and 1.0% SU + Met -Framingham equation- and 0.6% versus 0.4% SU + Met - Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation model-). Related adverse events were significantly (p = 0.016) more frequent in Pio cohorts (4.7% with Pio + SU, 5.1% with Pio + Met) than in the SU + Met cohort (2.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with T2D failing therapy, mostly SU or Met monotherapy, pioglitazone add-on treatment was associated with a significant improvement of micro- and macrovascular risk estimations. These results from real-life clinical conditions support the findings of prior randomised trials, although they should be interpreted with caution because of the observational, nonrandomised design.

Update on the safety of thiazolidinediones

Diabetic patients are at increased risk for developing cardiovascular disease, and they constitute a large proportion of the global cardiovascular disease burden. Although multiple drugs exist for treating the hyperglycemia associated with diabetes, few have been shown to reduce cardiovascular risk. Great hope surrounded the arrival of the thiazolidinediones-drugs that favorably affect insulin sensitivity, inflammation, and some aspects of lipid profiles in diabetic patients. However, the cardiovascular effects of these agents are varied, and studies have suggested that they may be associated with increases in ischemic heart disease and heart failure, as well as with an increased risk for bone fracture. The following article provides a summary of important studies that have been published regarding the safety profiles of these agents. Findings from two recently published trials, RECORD and BARI 2D, are emphasized in this paper.

The myocardial infarct size-limiting effect of sitagliptin is PKA-dependent, whereas the protective effect of pioglitazone is partially dependent on PKA

Pioglitazone (PIO) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogs limit infarct size (IS) in experimental models. The effects of the dipeptidyl-peptidase-IV inhibitors, which increase the endogenous levels of GLP-1, on myocardial protection, are unknown. We studied whether sitagliptin (SIT) and PIO have additive effects on IS limitation in the mouse. Mice received 3-day or 14-day oral SIT (300 mg.kg(-1).day(-1)), PIO (5 mg.kg(-1).day(-1)), SIT + PIO, or vehicle. In addition, mice received intravenous H-89 [20 mg/kg, a protein kinase A (PKA) inhibitor] or vehicle 1 h before ischemia. Rats underwent 30 min myocardial ischemia and 4 h reperfusion. SIT, PIO, and SIT + PIO for 3 days significantly reduced IS (24.3 +/- 2.7, 23.0 +/- 0.8, and 14.7 +/- 0.9%) compared with controls (46.2 +/- 2.8%). H-89 completely blocked the effect of SIT and partially blocked the PIO effect. SIT, but not PIO, increased cAMP levels. PKA activity was increased by PIO and to a greater extent by SIT. PIO, but not SIT, increased cytosolic phospholipase A(2) and cyclooxygenase-2 activity. Accordingly, 6-keto-PGF(1alpha) and 15-deoxy-PGJ(2) increased by PIO but not SIT. In contrast, SIT, and to a lesser extent PIO, increased 15-epi-lipoxin A(4) levels. H-89 completely blocked the effect of SIT and PIO on 15-epi-lipoxin A(4) levels. PIO, and to a greater extent SIT, increased endothelial nitric oxide synthase and cAMP response element-binding protein phosphorylation, an effect that was blocked by H-89. With a 14-day pretreatment experiment, IS was 46.4 +/- 1.0% in the control group, 16.9 +/- 0.6% in SIT (P < 0.001), 19.1 +/- 1.1% in PIO (P = 0.014), and 12.9 +/- 0.7% in SIT + PIO (P < 0.001). We found that SIT and PIO limit IS using different pathways. The protective effect of SIT is via cAMP-dependent PKA activation, whereas PIO mediates its effects via both PKA-dependent and -independent pathways.

Impact of metabolic syndrome compared with impaired fasting glucose on the development of type 2 diabetes in a general Japanese population: the Hisayama study

OBJECTIVE

We examined whether metabolic syndrome predicts incident type 2 diabetes more effectively than impaired fasting glucose (IFG) in a general Japanese population.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 1,935 nondiabetic subjects aged 40-79 years were followed-up prospectively for a mean of 11.8 years.

RESULTS

During the follow-up, 286 subjects developed type 2 diabetes. Compared with those without metabolic syndrome, the multivariate-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for incident type 2 diabetes was significantly higher in subjects of both sexes with metabolic syndrome, even after adjustment for confounding factors, age, family history of diabetes, total cholesterol, alcohol intake, smoking habits, and regular exercise (men: HR 2.58 [95% CI 1.85-3.59]; women: 3.69 [2.58-5.27]). The multivariate-adjusted HR of metabolic syndrome for type 2 diabetes was slightly lower in men and similar in women compared with that of IFG. The multivariate-adjusted HR for type 2 diabetes rose progressively as the number of metabolic syndrome components increased in both subjects with and without IFG. In stratified analysis, the multivariate-adjusted risk of type 2 diabetes was significantly higher in subjects with metabolic syndrome alone (2.37 [1.45-3.88]) or IFG alone (3.49 [2.57-4.74]) and markedly increased in subjects with both metabolic syndrome and IFG (6.76 [4.75-9.61]) than in subjects with neither metabolic syndrome nor IFG. Furthermore, the multivariate-adjusted risk for type 2 diabetes was also significantly higher in subjects with both metabolic syndrome and IFG than in those with either one alone (both P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that metabolic syndrome significantly increases the risk of incident type 2 diabetes, independent of IFG, and is therefore a valuable tool to identify individuals at high risk of type 2 diabetes.

Is the evidence from clinical trials for cardiovascular risk or harm for glitazones convincing?

Thiazolidinediones (TZDs), agonists of the nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma, induce the expression of many genes, including several enzymes and transporters involved in glucose and lipid metabolism. Although the efficacy of TZDs on blood glucose control in type 2 diabetes is not questionable, their cardiovascular effects have been debated, with beneficial or harmful actions suggested by different authors. This article reviews the available clinical evidence on the cardiovascular effects of TZDs, discussing possible mechanisms underlying the observed effects and suggesting some directions for future research.

Glomerular hyperfiltration and metabolic syndrome: results from the FIrenze-BAgno A Ripoli (FIBAR) Study

Metabolic syndrome (MS) has been associated with microalbuminuria and kidney disease. In the present cohort study, different methods for the estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) on the basis of serum creatinine were compared with respect to their association with MS and their predictive value for incident diabetes mellitus. The present analysis was performed on the cohort of subjects enrolled in the FIBAR study, a screening program for diabetes. GFR was estimated (eGFR) using three different methods: Cockroft-Gault (CG) formula, using actual body weight (CAW), CG formula using ideal body weight (CIW), and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula (M). The study was performed on 2,694 nondiabetic subjects, without history of renal insufficiency or serum creatinine at baseline >1.5 mg/dl. Mean follow-up was 27.8 +/- 11.5 months. Elevated eGFR, estimated with different methods, was associated with increased prevalence of most components of MS; however, an association between elevated clearance and MS was observed only when using CAW, which overestimates filtration in obese subjects. During follow-up, 40 new cases of diabetes were recorded (0.5/100 patient*years). After adjusting for age and sex, the HR (with 95% confidence intervals) for diabetes for patients in the highest quintile of eGFR was 1.14 [0.44-2.99], 0.89 [0.31-2.51], and 1.01 [0.42-2.41] for formula CAW, CIW, and M, respectively (all p > 0.7). Elevated eGFR, estimated through methods which do not produce a systematic overestimate in obese subjects, is not associated with the diagnosis of MS, and does not predict diabetes.

Differences in traditional and emerging cardiovascular risk factors of subjects discordantly classified by metabolic syndrome definitions of the International Diabetes Federation and the National Cholesterol Education Program

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Several working definitions of metabolic syndrome have been proposed for clinical use. However, individuals can be discordantly classified as having or not having metabolic syndrome depending on the choice of one or another definition. This study compared the cardiovascular risk profile of subjects concordantly and discordantly diagnosed by the criteria of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) and the criteria of the International Diabetes Federation (IDF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Nine hundred and twenty-nine non-diabetic adult subjects belonging to a cross-sectional population-based study in Gran Canaria island (Spain) were assessed. Participants completed a questionnaire and underwent physical examination, fasting blood analyses, and a standardized oral glucose tolerance test. Two hundred and four subjects (22%) had metabolic syndrome according to both definitions, 31 (3.3%) only by the IDF criteria, and 5 (0.5%) only by the NCEP criteria. Participants fulfilling both proposals showed more adverse age and sex-adjusted measures of BMI, waist, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, post-load glucose, HOMA-IR and plasminogen inhibitor activator-1 (PAI-1) than individuals exclusively satisfying the IDF criteria. Moreover, in contrast to subjects meeting both criteria, those that fulfilled only the IDF criteria had levels of BMI, waist, total and HDL cholesterol, post-load glucose, glycated HbA1c, C-reactive protein, PAI-1 and fibrinogen not significantly different from those observed in subjects without metabolic syndrome.

CONCLUSION

The IDF definition identifies a surplus of individuals whose cardiovascular risk profile, particularly regarding to some non-traditional cardiovascular risk factors, is less adverse than that observed in subjects also diagnosed by the NCEP definition.

Metabolic syndrome and risk of incident diabetes: findings from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition-Potsdam Study

BACKGROUND

Several aspects concerning the relationship between the metabolic syndrome and incident diabetes are incompletely understood including the magnitude of the risk estimate, potential gender differences in the associations between the metabolic syndrome and incident diabetes, the associations between the components of the metabolic syndrome and incident diabetes, and whether the metabolic syndrome provides additional prediction beyond its components. To shed light on these issues, we examined the prospective association between the metabolic syndrome defined by the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) and International Diabetes Federation (IDF) and diabetes.

METHODS

We used data for 2796 men and women aged 35-65 years from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition-Potsdam Study followed for an average of 6.9 years. This analysis employed a case-cohort design that included 697 participants who developed diabetes and 2099 participants who did not. Incident diabetes was identified on the basis of self-reports and verified by contacting the patient's attending physician.

RESULTS

The adjusted hazard ratio for the NCEP definition was 4.62 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.90-5.48) and that for the IDF definition was 4.59 (95% CI: 3.84-5.50). The adjusted hazard ratios for the NCEP but not IDF definition were higher for women than men. When participants who had no cardiometabolic abnormalities were used as the reference group for the NCEP definition, the adjusted hazard ratio for having 3 or more abnormalities increased to 22.50 (95% CI: 11.21-45.19). Of the five components, abdominal obesity and hyperglycemia were most strongly associated with incident diabetes.

CONCLUSION

In this study population, both definitions of the metabolic syndrome provided similar estimates of relative risk for incident diabetes. The increase in risk for participants with the metabolic syndrome according to the NCEP definition was very large when contrasted with the risk among those who had no cardiometabolic abnormalities.

Metabolic syndrome and incident diabetes: current state of the evidence

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to perform a quantitative review of prospective studies examining the association between the metabolic syndrome and incident diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Using the title terms "diabetes" and "metabolic syndrome" in PubMed, we searched for articles published since 1998.

RESULTS

Based on the results from 16 cohorts, we performed a meta-analysis of estimates of relative risk (RR) and incident diabetes. The random-effects summary RRs were 5.17 (95% CI 3.99-6.69) for the 1999 World Health Organization definition (ten cohorts); 4.45 (2.41-8.22) for the 1999 European Group for the Study of Insulin Resistance definition (four cohorts); 3.53 (2.84-4.39) for the 2001 National Cholesterol Education Program definition (thirteen cohorts); 5.12 (3.26-8.05) for the 2005 American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute definition (five cohorts); and 4.42 (3.30-5.92) for the 2005 International Diabetes Federation definition (nine cohorts). The fixed-effects summary RR for the 2004 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/American Heart Association definition was 5.16 (4.43-6.00) (six cohorts). Higher number of abnormal components was strongly related to incident diabetes. Compared with participants without an abnormality, estimates of RR for those with four or more abnormal components ranged from 10.88 to 24.4. Limited evidence suggests fasting glucose alone may be as good as metabolic syndrome for diabetes prediction.

CONCLUSIONS

The metabolic syndrome, however defined, has a stronger association with incident diabetes than that previously demonstrated for coronary heart disease. Its clinical value for diabetes prediction remains uncertain.

Metabolic syndrome and incidence of type 2 diabetes in patients with manifest vascular disease

Risk reduction in patients with clinically manifest vascular disease focuses on preventing new vascular events and not on prevention of type 2 diabetes. However, given the common pathophysiological pathways involved in the development of atherosclerosis and type 2 diabetes, it is probable that people with atherosclerotic vascular disease have an elevated risk of type 2 diabetes. The present prospective cohort study investigated the incidence of type 2 diabetes and the effect of the presence of metabolic syndrome on the incidence of type 2 diabetes in 4,022 patients with clinically manifest atherosclerosis, included in the study from September 1996 to June 2006. Patients who died (n=456), who were lost to follow-up (n=84) and those with diabetes at baseline (n=558) were excluded, leaving 2,924 patients for analysis. The incidence of diabetes was assessed by questionnaire (self-reported diabetes). During 13,726 person-years of follow-up (median follow-up 4.3 years, range 2.4-7.0 years), there were 152 type 2 diabetes cases (5.2%), corresponding to an incidence rate of 11.1 (95% CI 9.4-13.0) per 1,000 person-years. Patients with metabolic syndrome were at increased risk of incident type 2 diabetes compared to those without metabolic syndrome, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 5.7 (95% CI 3.7-8.9) for Revised National Cholesterol Education Program, 6.0 (4.1-9.0) for National Cholesterol Education Program and 4.0 (2.7-6.1) for International Diabetes Federation definitions of metabolic syndrome. Of all metabolic syndrome components, abdominal obesity was most strongly associated with incident type 2 diabetes (94% higher risk of type 2 diabetes for 1 standard deviation (11.3 cm) increase in waist circumference). In conclusion, patients with manifest atherosclerosis are at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Metabolic syndrome identifies those at the highest risk and is an easy to use clinical tool. Abdominal obesity is a strong individual predictor of type 2 diabetes. Patients with manifest atherosclerosis and metabolic syndrome may derive particular benefit from lifestyle interventions focusing on weight reduction.

Cardiovascular risk in the metabolic syndrome: fact or fiction?

In population-based studies, a cluster of cardiovascular risk factors comprising the metabolic syndrome (MetS) has been documented as predictive of cardiovascular disease events and type 2 diabetes. Currently, there are several proposed definitions of the MetS, although data support some advantages of using the 2005 National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III definition, which is considered superior to most others, including the one from the 2005 International Diabetes Federation study. One controversial issue is that some of the conventional cardiovascular risk factors included in the MetS cluster appear to be equally predictive of cardiovascular outcomes as the syndrome itself (eg, the influence of smoking habits). Further observational and intervention studies are needed to explore this issue and target the core problem of the syndrome, which is proposed to be insulin resistance. Useful therapies for the metabolic syndrome include lifestyle modification and drugs that lower conventional cardiovascular risk factors, such as metformin, the "glitazones," and evidence-based drugs.