Stage I seminoma of the testis. Adjuvant radiotherapy or surveillance?

Stage I Seminoma of the Testis: Long Term Results and Toxicity with Adjuvant Radiotherapy

Aims and background

Pure testicular seminoma has historically been treated with post-orchidectomy radiation therapy with excellent results. Recently, several aspects of the treatment of stage I seminoma have been questioned. We assessed long-term results and toxicity of patients with pure testicular seminoma treated at the Department of Radiation Oncology of S. Chiara Hospital, Trento.

Methods

From 1953 to 1987, 102 patients with stage I pure testicular seminoma were given megavoltage irradiation with curative intent. All patients had a minimum follow-up of 3 years (maximum 37 years, median 13 years). They received a mean para-aortic/pelvic dose of 33.07 Gy (range 23.70-45.20 Gy) with different doses and fields reflecting the change in techniques over a long period of time.

Results

The cause-specific actuarial survival at 30 years was 99% and crude survival 67%. One patient had an out-field relapse (inguinal) after a few months and was cured with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Another patient relapsed with widespared metastases and died after 1 year of progressive disease. Early toxycity was mild and the treatment was well tolerated. Late side effects were reported in 8/102 patients.

Conclusion

In our series adjuvant radiation therapy resulted in cure rates corresponding to those reported in the literature. The 30-year actuarial survival of 99% was extremely good and the toxicity of the treatment was mild. Post-orchidectomy radiation to the para-aortic and ipsilateral pelvic nodes is a safe and effective method of preventing recurrences and is currently to be considered the treatment of choice in stage I testicular seminoma.

Management options for stage I seminoma

Stage I seminoma is the most common clinical scenario among patients with testicular cancer. Following orchiectomy, various treatment alternatives (adjuvant radiotherapy, surveillance, chemotherapy) can be offered that yield similar efficacy results and definitive cure is the rule. However, there is no consensus on the optimal management choice and considerable debate has been raised in recent years. The pros and the cons associated with each therapy, as well as their long-term outcomes are discussed in this review. Overall burden of treatment needed, therapy-related morbidity, economic costs, quality of life issues and patient preferences should all be considered. Refinement in the knowledge of predictive factors for relapse and mounting experience with both surveillance and adjuvant chemotherapy have led to consideration of risk-adapted treatment strategies as an alternative to standard radiotherapy. Although this model needs to be improved and validated, active close surveillance for low-risk patients and adjuvant therapy for those uncompliant or at higher risk of relapse seem to be acceptable options for patients with stage I seminoma.

Surveillance in stage I seminoma patients: a long-term assessment

BACKGROUND

Following orchidectomy patients with stage I seminoma of the testis may be managed by either surveillance or adjuvant treatment. In view of the very high cure rate, it is important to analyse long-term outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To provide data to advise patients on treatment burden and risk of recurrence associated with surveillance.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We audited the case records of 164 stage I seminoma patients registered at the Royal Marsden Hospital who were managed with a surveillance policy between 1980 and 2004 and followed for 1-20 yr (median: 13.5 yr).

MEASUREMENTS

All treatments and patterns of relapse were documented.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Twenty-two of 164 (13%) patients had relapsed at a median of 15.5 mo (range: 6-55 mo) from orchidectomy. Eighteen relapses appeared to be confined to the para-aortic nodes, but 6 of the 13 (46%) men treated with only para-aortic radiotherapy suffered a further relapse at another site. The disease-specific mortality was 1.3%. In the complete series of 164 patients, a total of 50 cycles of chemotherapy and 26 courses of radiotherapy was administered, representing an average of 0.46 "treatment units" per patient or an average of 3.45 treatment units per relapsing patient. The total number of treatment days was 390 d for radiotherapy and 133 d for chemotherapy, representing an average of 3.2 d per patient or 23.8 d per relapsing patient. This was a single-centre series extending back to the 1980s. Imaging and treatment protocols have advanced since then.

CONCLUSIONS

Surveillance postorchidectomy is a safe practice in the long term, and the majority of patients can avoid further treatment. There is the risk that those who do relapse face a higher burden of treatment than would be required if adjuvant treatment had been given.

Controversies in the management of early-stage germ cell tumors

The optimal management of clinical stage I testicular germ cell tumors remains controversial despite a cure rate of 99%. Alternatives for stage I nonseminomas include close surveillance, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, and chemotherapy. For pure seminomas, the options are surveillance, chemotherapy, and radiation. Understanding the pros and cons of each approach may help in choosing a management plan.

Stage I testicular seminoma: management and controversies

Seminomas constitute more than half of testicular germ-cell tumours and 70-80% of patients with seminoma present with clinical stage I disease. Post-orchiectomy, management options include irradiation, surveillance or chemotherapy. Adjuvant irradiation to the infradiaphragmatic lymph nodes is the standard of care with relapse rates of 3-4%. Long-term follow-up data have shown association with late complications (cardiotoxicity, second malignancy, fertility impairment). Surveillance is an attractive alternative but relapse rates are higher ranging between 15 and 20%. Single agent carboplatin chemotherapy has demonstrated survival data equivalent to radiotherapy but long-term relapse and toxicity data are yet to be confirmed. Routine follow-up after irradiation and the role of risk stratification also remain unclear. Highly curative rates can be attained by all three modalities. Standard treatment with radiotherapy is challenged by surveillance and chemotherapy. Toxicity issues and patients' preferences are considered when management decisions are made.

A comprehensive systematic review of testicular germ cell tumor surveillance

BACKGROUND

Testicular cancer is the most common malignancy in men aged 15-34, and its incidence has been increasing over the past half-century. Survival for stage I testis cancer approaches 100% regardless of management strategy which is often dictated by other factors such as perceived morbidity. Advances in treatment have attempted to decrease morbidity and surveillance is thought to achieve this goal.

METHODS

An English language literature search of MEDLINE from 1966 to December 2005 and CINAHL from 1982 to December 2005 was conducted using a broad search strategy. Comparative and descriptive original articles on outcomes of seminoma or NSGCT surveillance would be deemed eligible and review articles containing no original data were omitted. One hundred and thirty-eight articles were selected for formal review, during which a database was compiled that documented the first author, publication year, tumor histologic type, study purpose or topic(s), methodology, sample size, median follow-up, and relevant results.

RESULTS

Most evidence for the efficacy of surveillance is from descriptive series or non-experimental comparative studies. Relapse occurs in approximately 28% and 17% of surveillance patients in NSGCT and seminoma, respectively, and cause-specific survival is approximately 98% and 100%, respectively. Compliance with surveillance ranges from poor to adequate, however there is no evidence that compliance impacts clinical outcome. Cost analyses have yielded inconsistent results when comparing treatment modalities. There is scant literature on quality of life and psychosocial issues and results are inconsistent. Active surveillance appears to be appropriate and perhaps optimal first line management of clinical stage I seminoma and non-seminomatous germ cell tumors. Further quantitative and qualitative research is warranted to deepen understanding of these issues that may impact treatment decision-making.

Surveillance in stage I testicular seminoma

Treatment options in patients with stage I testicular seminoma include adjuvant radiotherapy (RT), surveillance, and adjuvant chemotherapy. RT was the treatment of choice for the past 50 years, but there has been increasing concern in the past decade regarding late complications. Surveillance, reserving treatment for patients who relapse, has been shown to be a safe and effective strategy. It allows >80% of patients to avoid any post-orchidectomy treatment and is the recommended approach for these patients. The possible role of adjuvant chemotherapy is currently being assessed in clinical trials and should not be used outside of a study setting.

Intertubular growth in pure seminomas: associations with poor prognostic parameters

Clinical stage I seminomas are effectively treated with surgery raising concerns as to when to give adjuvant radiation therapy given the risk of secondary malignancies. A recent randomized trial found tumor size and rete testis invasion to be the strongest predictors of relapse in clinical stage I seminomas. These 2 parameters may be surrogate measures of tumor volume. Intertubular seminoma (ITS) of the testis describes the presence of neoplastic germ cells within the interstitium of the testis. These cells are detected away from the main macroscopic mass. Because ITS can infiltrate in a 3-dimensional fashion, it may also represent a measure of tumor volume not usually noted in standard pathology reporting. The goal of this study was to determine the incidence of ITS in pure seminomas and its association with other prognostic parameters. One hundred twenty consecutive pure seminomas surgically removed between 1998 and 2003 were evaluated. ITS was defined as the presence of an interstitial or intertubular growth pattern of tumor cells, which was noncontiguous with the main tumor and present at least 3 high-power fields away from the tumor mass. The average tumor size was 3.4 cm. Of the entire cohort of patients, which included pathological stages T1 through T3, 11% had invasion through the tunica albuginea, 51% had rete testis invasion, 51% had lymphovascular invasion, 93% had associated intratubular germ-cell neoplasia, and 36% had ITS. ITS was significantly associated with rete testis invasion ( P = .001). Logistic regression analysis looking at ITS, tumor size, patient age, and lymphovascular invasion revealed that only ITS was associated with rete testis invasion (RR, 4.1, P < .0001). ITS is present in a significant proportion of pure seminomas and has a significant association with rete testis invasion. The presence of ITS may therefore be an important prognostic factor, not only because it alters the calculated size of the tumor but also because it has an association with rete testis invasion.

[Radiotherapy in stage I testicular seminoma: retrospective study and review of literature]

INTRODUCTION

Seminoma accounts for about 40% of germ cell tumours of the testicle. In this retrospective analysis, we review literature concerning management of stage I seminoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between March 1987 and April 2001, 65 patients with stage I pure testicular seminoma received adjuvant radiotherapy with a 25 MV linear accelerator.

RESULTS

Median age was 33 years. Testicular tumour has been found on the right testis in 39 patients and on the left one in 24 patients. Patients have been treated using an anterior-posterior parallel pair and have received 20-25 Gy in 10-14 fractions. The target volume consisted of paraaortic, and paraaortic + homolateral iliac lymph nodes in 17 and 46 patients, respectively. Acute toxicity was mainly digestive, 38% of patients presenting nausea and vomiting. Median follow-up time was 37 months. All patients are alive in complete remission.

DISCUSSION

Because of good radio-sensitivity of seminoma, radiotherapy is regarded as standard adjuvant treatment (5 years relapse rate: 3-5%). Acute toxicity is dominated by moderate gastro-intestinal side effects. Secondary neoplasia represents one of the worst possible long-term complications of therapy. Waiting for ongoing randomised trials, the modern literature for seminoma reflects a trend toward lower radiation doses (20-25 Gy) and smaller treatment volumes (paraaortic field). Adjuvant chemotherapy with two courses of carboplatin, might be equivalent to radiotherapy but must be investigated in randomised trials. A surveillance policy is one of the other management options less recommended.

Prognostic factors for relapse in stage I seminoma managed by surveillance: a pooled analysis

PURPOSE

Several management options are available to patients with stage I seminoma, including adjuvant radiotherapy, surveillance, and adjuvant chemotherapy. We performed a pooled analysis of patients from the four largest surveillance studies to better delineate prognostic factors associated with disease progression.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Individual patient data were obtained from each center (Princess Margaret Hospital, Danish Testicular Cancer Study Group, Royal Marsden Hospital, and Royal London Hospital) for 638 patients. Tumor characteristics (size, histologic subtype, invasion of rete testis, and tumor invasion into small vessels [SVI]) as well as age at diagnosis were analyzed for prognostic importance for relapse.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 7.0 years (range, 0.02 to 17.5 years), 121 relapses were observed for an actuarial 5-year relapse-free rate (RFR) of 82.3%. On univariate analysis, tumor size (RFR: <or= 4 cm, 87%; > 4 cm, 76%; P =.003), rete testis invasion (RFR: 86% [absent] v 77% [present], P =.003), and the presence of SVI (RFR: 86% [absent] v 77% [present], P =.038) were predictive of relapse. On multivariate analysis, tumor size (<or= 4 cm v > 4 cm, hazard ratio 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 3.2) and invasion of the rete testis (hazard ratio 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.6) remained as important predictors for relapse.

CONCLUSION

We have identified size of primary tumor and rete testis invasion as important prognostic factors for relapse in patients with stage I seminoma managed with surveillance. This information will allow patients and clinicians to choose management based on a more accurate assessment of an individual patient's risk of relapse. In addition, it will allow clinicians to tailor follow-up protocols based on risk of occult disease.

Surveillance for stage I testicular seminoma. a review

There is good evidence that patients with stage I seminoma can be managed equally well after orchidectomy with surveillance and adjuvant retroperitoneal radiation therapy. There is considerable reluctance amongst many physicians to accept surveillance as a management option in stage I seminoma and this is largely based on the excellent results achieved with adjuvant retroperiteonal radiation for many years. However, patients with stage I seminoma have a long life span and it is possible that the long-term sequelae of radiation treatment could have a negative impact on quality of life and longevity. It is of utmost importance to continue the study of the long-term effects of all current treatment approaches, in particular the risk of induction of second malignancies. However, the psychosocial impact on patients of surveillance and other management strategies must also be assessed. Stage I testicular seminoma is highly curable with currently available management approaches and the current challenge for clinicians is to maintain these excellent results while minimizing toxicity and individualising treatment to the specific social, economic and emotional circumstances of each patient. Surveillance should be one of the management options offered to patients with stage I seminoma.

Treatment of stage I seminoma: should beta-HCG positive seminoma be treated aggressively?

To assess the prognostic value of beta-HCG positive stage I seminoma, clinical records of 122 patients with testicular germ cell tumour were reviewed. Fifty-five patients (mean age 38.7 years) of 122 (45.1%) had stage I seminoma. Preorchiectomy beta-HCG level was determined in 54 patients. Twenty-nine patients of 54 (53.7%) had elevated preorchiectomy beta-HCG level. No significant relationship was found in the rate of locally progressive cancer between beta-HCG positive and negative cases. Treatment consisted of radiotherapy after inguinal orchiectomy for beta-HCG negative cases, and chemotherapy or radiotherapy for beta-HCG positive cases. Tumour recurrence was found in one patient with normal beta-HCG level. Our limited series demonstrated that preorchiectomy elevated beta-HCG had no significant relationship to local tumour invasion or prognostic value. Therefore, infradiaphragmatic radiation therapy may be useful for beta-HCG positive stage I seminoma.

Long-term results of adjuvant irradiation or surveillance in stage I testicular seminoma

BACKGROUND

Excellent treatment results are obtained for stage I testicular seminoma treated with orchiectomy and prophylactic radiotherapy. In patients with stage I nonseminomatous testicular tumors, surveillance alone is successful, however, this treatment option for stage I testicular seminomas is controversial. There have been few reports of long-term follow-up of surveillance alone for patients with stage I testicular seminoma.

METHODS

To assess the appropriateness of th is treatment option, a retrospective survey of stage I testicular seminoma was undertaken. Twenty-seven patients who underwent prophylactic radiation therapy (RT group) and 41 patients followed only by surveillance (S group) after high orchiectomy were evaluated. Their follow-up consisted of frequent clinical examinations, abdominal CT scans, chest x-rays and serum tumor markers.

RESULTS

In the RT group, with a median follow-up period of 15 years, 1 patient (3.6%) had a recurrence in the lung at 4 months after orchiectomy and died, but the remaining 26 are alive with no evidence of disease (NED). In the S group, with a median follow-up period of 7.3 years, 5 (12.2%) relapsed in the retroperitoneal lymph nodes, but all are alive with NED following chemotherapy. The remaining 36 are all alive without recurrence (follow-up period, 38 to 132 months). Although the relapse rate in the S group was relatively higher than in the RT group, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

If a frequent follow-up protocol is administered and followed by the patient, surveillance alone may be a recommended management for stage I testicular seminoma.

Para-aortic irradiation only appears to be adequate treatment for patients with Stage I seminoma of the testis

PURPOSE

Results of treatment of patients with Stage I seminoma with orchiectomy and radiotherapy are excellent. Even without adjuvant radiotherapy, the relapse rate is only 15-20%; most of the patients fail in the retroperitoneum, with rare failures observed in the pelvis (0.5-2%). In 1991, we began a prospective study evaluating para-aortic lymph node radiation as the only adjuvant treatment for such patients. This paper reports our preliminary results.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Between March 1991 and January 1996, 35 patients with histologically proven Stage I seminoma were entered in the study. Median age was 37.9 years (range: 27-65 years). A radical inguinal orchiectomy was performed in all patients. Staging workup consisted of a chest X-ray; B-HCG, alpha-fetoprotein, and CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis in all patients. Lymphangiogram was done in 23 (66%) of 35 patients for further evaluation of the retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Radiotherapy consisted of treatment to the para-aortic region only. Parallel opposed fields extending from the top of T11 to the bottom of L5 were used. The median field size was 8.7 x 21.8 cm (range: 7-11 x 18-26 cm). The median total dose, prescribed at midpoint, was 25 Gy given in 15 daily fractions of 1.66 Gy. Follow-up was performed every 3 months for the first year, every 4-5 months for the second and third years, and every 6 months thereafter. Chest X-ray, tumor markers, and CT scan of the pelvis were performed routinely as part of the follow-up investigation.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 39.7 months (range: 16-74 months), 34 (97.1%) of 35 patients are alive with no evidence of disease for an overall actuarial survival rate of 97.1% at 5 years and a cause-specific actuarial survival rate of 100%. Treatment morbidity was limited to Grade I-II acute side effects in 18 (51.4%) of 35 patients. No late side effects were seen.

CONCLUSION

From our preliminary results, adjuvant radiation treatment limited to the para-aortic lymph node region, without ipsilateral pelvic irradiation, appears to be adequate treatment for Stage I seminoma. Such an approach in our patients resulted in minimal toxicity and excellent disease-free survival.

External beam abdominal radiotherapy in patients with seminoma stage I: field type, testicular dose, and spermatogenesis

PURPOSE

To establish a predictive model for the estimation of the gonadal dose during adjuvant para-aortic (PA) or dog leg (DL: PA plus ipsilateral iliac) field radiotherapy in patients with testicular seminoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The surface gonadal dose was measured in patients with seminoma Stage I receiving PA or DL radiotherapy. Sperm cell analysis was performed before and 1 year after irradiation. PA and DL radiotherapy were simulated in the Alderson phantom while we measured the dose to the surface and middle of an artificial testicle, varying its position within realistic anatomical constraints. The symphysis-to-testicle distance (STD), field length, and thickness of the patient were experimental variables. The developed mathematical model was validated in subsequent patients.

RESULTS

The mean gonadal dose in patients was 0.09 and 0.32 Gy after PA and DL irradiation, respectively (p < 0.001). DL radiotherapy, but not PA irradiation led to significant reduction of the sperm count 1 year after irradiation. The gonadal dose-reducing effect of PA irradiation was confirmed in the Alderson phantom. A significant correlation was found between the STD and the gonadal dose during DL irradiation. A mathematical model was established for calculation of the gonadal dose and confirmed by measurements in patients.

CONCLUSIONS

During radiotherapy of seminoma, the gonadal dose decreases with increasing STD. It is possible to predict the individual gonadal dose based on delivered midplane dose and STD.

Adjuvant radiation therapy for low stage testicular seminoma: Diagnosis and therapy in evolution

We performed a retrospective study to evaluate the clinical outcome of patients with early stage testicular seminoma who received adjuvant radiation therapy after orchiectomy over the past 15 years. During the 15 year period, 61 patients were treated with adjuvant radiation therapy for stages I, IIA, and IIB testicular seminoma. Patients received from 2,000 to 4,000 cGy delivered by a Cobalt machine and later by a linear accelerator. Our standard treatment protocol was modified in 13 patients: 7 secondary to abnormal lymphangiography (LAG) parameters and 6 due to abnormal computed tomography findings. We analyzed each patient's outcome for survival, recurrence, and complications. We then compared outcomes, looking for differing trends based on evolving evaluation or treatment techniques. The average follow-up is 75 months, with an overall survival rate of 93%. The cause specific survival is 100%. Four patients died from intercurrent diseases; at time of autopsy, one of these patients was noted to have a small focus of seminoma in a lateral inguinal node. He died from widely disseminated Hodgkin's disease. Three patients, including the aforementioned one, had recurrent disease outside of the radiation field, yielding a recurrence rate of 5%. No significant long term treatment complications were reported, although 24% of patients had one or more complications from LAG. Regardless the various changes in patient evaluation and radiation treatment techniques over the past 15 years, adjuvant radiation therapy remains effective in patients with early stage testicular seminoma.

Results of a policy of surveillance in stage I testicular seminoma

PURPOSE

To determine what proportion of patients with Stage I testicular seminoma will be cured with orchidectomy alone.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From August 1984 to December 1991 148 patients with Stage I testicular seminoma were entered on a prospective study of surveillance following orchidectomy. The eligibility criteria included a normal chest X ray, lymphogram, computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis, and normal post-orchidectomy tumor markers (AFP and BHCG). Patients were followed with a clinical assessment (markers, chest X ray and CT abdomen and pelvis) at 4 to 6 monthly intervals.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 47 months (range 7-87 months), the actuarial relapse-free rate was 81% at 5 years. Twenty-three patients have relapsed with a median time to relapse of 15 months (range 2-61 months). Four patients (17%) relapsed at 4 or more years from diagnosis. Twenty-one of the 23 relapses occurred in the paraaortic lymph nodes, one patient relapsed in the mediastinum and ipsilateral inguinal nodes and one patient had an isolated ipsilateral inguinal node relapse. Nineteen patients were treated for relapse with external beam radiation therapy of which three developed a second relapse and were salvaged with chemotherapy. Four patients were treated for first relapse with chemotherapy and one developed a second relapse and died of disease. Age at diagnosis was the only prognostic factor for relapse, with patients age < or = 34 having an actuarial relapse-free rate at 5 years of 70% in contrast to a 91% relapse-free rate in those > 34 years of age.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend that surveillance in Stage I testicular seminoma should only be performed in a study setting until further data regarding the risk of late relapse and the efficacy of salvage chemotherapy is available.

Testicular seminoma stage I: treatment results and long-term follow-up (1968-1988)

Sixty-nine patients with stage I testicular seminoma were referred to the Northern Israel Oncology Center between 1968 and 1987. Sixty-four patients were irradiated postoperatively and five patients had surveillance alone. Complete follow-up was available for all patients, with a median follow-up of 86 months (range 9-239 months). The last follow-up was in December 1988. Actuarial survival was 94% to 5, 10, 15, and 20 years. Six patients relapsed following completion of irradiation. All the recurrences occurred outside the radiation field. Three of the relapsed patients could be salvaged with cisplatinum-based chemotherapy and are alive at 4, 7, and 10 years following second-line treatment. Acute or chronic side effects were mild and manageable. Seven patients developed second primary cancers, two within and six outside the radiation field. While surveillance policy alone in stage I testicular seminoma may be successful in terms of patient outcome, it requires prolonged observation, good compliance of patients, and intensive use of resources. Thus, until proved otherwise, infradiaphragmatic radiotherapy should further remain the optimal routine treatment in seminoma patients with stage I disease.