Urological malignancy after renal transplantation

Testis and penile cancers in kidney transplant recipients: A systematic review of epidemiology, treatment options and oncological outcomes by the EAU-YAU Penile and Testis Cancer Working Group

INTRODUCTION

Kidney transplant (KT) recipients are at an elevated risk of developing de novo cancers. However, penile (PeCa) and testis cancers have received limited attention in this setting.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the epidemiology, treatment options, and oncological outcomes of penile and testis cancer in KT recipients.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We conducted a systematic review of prospective, retrospective and national transplant registries studies published up to December 2023. Data on the incidence of penile and testis cancers among KT recipients, diagnostic protocols, screening recommendations, and therapeutic strategies tailored for KT recipients were collected. The risk of bias (RoB) of included studies was determined using the Newcastle and Ottawa scale.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Overall, 21 studies involving 67924 KT male recipients were included. PeCa was diagnosed in 33 patients, yielding an incidence ranging from 0.04% to 0.3%. Additionally, 67 cases of testicular cancer were recorded, with an incidence ranging from 0.03% to 0.55%. Most tumors were localized, and histology variants were uncommon. While the surgical treatment of the primary tumor remains consistent with that of the general population, the use of radiotherapy and cytotoxic treatments are less frequently reported in this setting. These therapies should be considered on an individualized basis to minimize the risk of graft injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Penile and testis cancers are relatively uncommon among KT recipients. General screening protocols and deviation from current treatment guidelines are not recommended in localized diseases. Given the risk of graft damage, any non-cytotoxic option should be preferred in locally advanced cases.

Temporal trends of de novo urological malignancy in renal transplant recipients without a cancer history: A longitudinal cohort study

BACKGROUND

The incidence of malignancies after successful kidney transplantation has historically been higher than in the general population, with adverse impact on clinical outcomes. However, uncertainty remains as to which cancers occur at what time points after kidney transplantation.

METHODS

We conducted a longitudinal cohort study to investigate the temporal trends and topographic patterns of de novo malignancies to optimize surveillance protocols and improve transplant outcome in renal transplant recipients. Measurement of death and cancer events was performed to calculate the cumulative risk of events of interest.

RESULTS

Between 2000 and 2013, 3169 renal transplant recipients were retrospectively screened; 3035 (96%) of them met eligibility criteria and were evaluated with a follow-up of 27612 person-years. There was suboptimal overall survival and malignancy-free survival in renal transplant recipients compared to reference groups (HR: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.50-1.82; p < .001; HR: 2.33; 95% CI: 2.04-2.66; p < .001, respectively). Among renal transplant recipients, urological malignancies were predominant (57.5%), followed by digestive tract malignancies (21.4%). The cancer risks of the urinary bladder and upper urinary tract were lower in male subjects (HR: .48; 95% CI: .33-.72; p < .001; HR: .34; 95% CI: .20-.59; p < .001, respectively). The temporal trends of urological malignancies among renal transplant recipients were expressed in a bimodal pattern, with M-shaped peaks at 3 and 9 years, with gender disparity.

CONCLUSIONS

In renal transplant recipients, cancer occurrences are shown as M-shaped twin peaks. Our study highlights that specific customized 'targeted' strategies for cancer surveillance programs are required to optimize posttransplant care.

Bladder paraganglioma after kidney transplantation: A case report

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation is associated with an increased risk of tumors in the urinary bladder. Among all the pathological types of tumors in the bladder, paraganglioma, which arises from extra-adrenal paraganglia and consists of chromaffin cells, is rare. Paragangliomas might cause severe clinical symptoms due to catecholamine hypersecretion or mass compression. Bladder paragangliomas are rare, especially those appearing after kidney transplantation. Here, we report a case of bladder paraganglioma developing after kidney transplantation.

CASE SUMMARY

A 63-year-old woman received a kidney transplant 12 years ago and took oral immunosuppressants (cyclosporine, mizoribine, and methylprednisolone) for regular post-transplant treatment. The patient felt no discomfort and she came to the hospital for a routine checkup. A mass located in the bladder was incidentally discovered by computed tomography, and she underwent surgical treatment. A 2 cm × 2 cm invasive mass was found in the trigone of the bladder and the mass was removed. The diagnosis of paraganglioma was confirmed by morphology and immunophenotyping. The patient had a good prognosis and is still alive.

CONCLUSION

Paraganglioma can grow in the bladder, which might cause no clinical symptoms. The diagnosis mainly depends on morphology and immunophenotyping. Surgical resection is an important treatment option for such patients.

Risk factors, management, and survival of bladder cancer after kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Kidney transplantation is associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer; however guidelines have not been established on the management of bladder cancer after kidney transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature review using PubMed was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement to identify studies concerning the prevalence and survival of bladder cancer after kidney transplantation. The risk factors and management of bladder cancer after kidney transplantation were also reviewed and discussed.

RESULTS

A total of 41 studies, published between 1996 and 2018, reporting primary data on bladder cancer after kidney transplantation were identified. Marked heterogeneity in bladder cancer prevalence, time to diagnosis, non-muscle invasive/muscle-invasive bladder cancer prevalence, and survival was noted. Four studies, published between 2003 and 2017, reporting primary data on bladder cancer treated with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) after kidney transplantation were identified. Disease-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were similar between BCG studies (75-100%).

CONCLUSIONS

Carcinogen exposure that led to ESRD, BKV, HPV, immunosuppressive agents, and the immunosuppressed state likely contribute to the increased risk of bladder cancer after renal transplantation. Non-muscle invasive disease should be treated with transurethral resection. BCG can be safely used in transplant recipients and likely improves the disease course. Muscle-invasive disease should be treated with radical cystectomy, with special consideration to the dissection and urinary diversion choice. Chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors can be safely used in regionally advanced bladder cancer with potential benefit. mTOR inhibitors may reduce the risk of developing bladder cancer, and immunosuppression medications should be reduced if malignancy develops.

Risk factors, management, and survival of bladder cancer after kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Kidney transplantation is associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer; however guidelines have not been established on the management of bladder cancer after kidney transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature review using PubMed was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement to identify studies concerning the prevalence and survival of bladder cancer after kidney transplantation. The risk factors and management of bladder cancer after kidney transplantation were also reviewed and discussed.

RESULTS

A total of 41 studies, published between 1996 and 2018, reporting primary data on bladder cancer after kidney transplantation were identified. Marked heterogeneity in bladder cancer prevalence, time to diagnosis, non-muscle invasive/muscle-invasive bladder cancer prevalence, and survival was noted. Four studies, published between 2003 and 2017, reporting primary data on bladder cancer treated with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) after kidney transplantation were identified. Disease-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were similar between BCG studies (75-100%).

CONCLUSIONS

Carcinogen exposure that led to ESRD, BKV, HPV, immunosuppressive agents, and the immunosuppressed state likely contribute to the increased risk of bladder cancer after renal transplantation. Non-muscle invasive disease should be treated with transurethral resection. BCG can be safely used in transplant recipients and likely improves the disease course. Muscle-invasive disease should be treated with radical cystectomy, with special consideration to the dissection and urinary diversion choice. Chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors can be safely used in regionally advanced bladder cancer with potential benefit. mTOR inhibitors may reduce the risk of developing bladder cancer, and immunosuppression medications should be reduced if malignancy develops.

[Localized Prostate cancer in candidates for renal transplantation and recipients of a kidney transplant: The French Guidelines from CTAFU]

OBJECTIVE

To define guidelines for the management of localized prostate cancer (PCa) in kidney transplant (KTx) candidates and recipients.

METHOD

A systematic review (Medline) of the literature was conducted by the CTAFU to report prostate cancer epidemiology, screening, diagnosis and management in KTx candidates and recipients with the corresponding level of evidence.

RESULTS

KTx recipients are at similar risk for PCa as general population. Thus, PCa screening in this setting is defined according to global French guidelines from CCAFU. Systematic screening is proposed in candidates for renal transplant over 50 y-o. PCa diagnosis is based on prostate biopsies performed after multiparametric MRI and preventive antibiotics. CCAFU guidelines remain applicable for PCa treatment in KTx recipients with some specificities, especially regarding lymph nodes management. Treatment options in candidates for KTx need to integrate waiting time and access to transplantation. Current data allows the CTAFU to propose mandatory waiting times after PCa treatment in KTx candidates with a weak level of evidence.

CONCLUSION

These French recommendations should contribute to improve PCa management in KTx recipients and candidates, integrating oncological objectives with access to transplantation.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Evaluation of the β-Human Papillomavirus in Immunosuppressed Individuals with Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Background

Some types of beta-human papillomavirus (β-HPV) may be one of the probable causes of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in transplant recipients. β-HPVs are linked to SCC in the literature with small number of subjects.

Aim

Herein, the first meta-analysis was carried out on the association between β-HPVs and cutaneous SCC in immunosuppressed patients.

Methods

A systematic search was carried out in the PubMed and Scopus databases up to December 2018. The odds ratio (OR) were calculated by RevMan 5.3 software and the event rate (ER) by Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 2.0 software with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

A total of 1250 records were identified through the two databases, but at last eleven studies were included in the meta-analysis that they were published from 1989 to 2018. The results showed a significantly high prevalence of β-HPVs in cutaneous SCC patients (ER = 69.1%; 95%CI: 58.7%, 77.8%). In addition, the prevalence of overall β-HPVs and β-HPVs of 5, 8, 9, 17, 49, 75, and 76 in immunosuppressed cutaneous SCC patients was significantly higher compared with controls.

Conclusions

The findings of the present meta-analysis support the hypothesis that β-HPV may play a role in cutaneous SCC development in immunosuppressed individuals.

Diagnosis and Management of a De Novo Urothelial Carcinoma in a Kidney Allograft: A Case Report

INTRODUCTION

Following renal transplantation, the incidence of malignancies is 3-5 times higher than that of healthy individuals. Among other type of cancers, the risk of urological tumors is also elevated. However, only a few cases of de novo transitional cell carcinomas occurring in renal allografts have been reported.

CASE REPORT

A 63-year-old tertiary transplanted male patient was urgently hospitalized for a painless macroscopic hematuria. Ultrasonography revealed pyelectasis and a hematoma in the renal pelvis. A percutaneous nephrostomy tube was inserted. An anterograde pyelography was performed later, where a filling defect was still observable in the location of the previously reported hypoechoic mass. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography showed enhancement of the lesion. An ultrasound-guided percutaneous biopsy was performed. The histologic evaluation revealed a high-grade transitional cell carcinoma. A whole-body staging computed tomography scan did not show signs of metastatic disease. The renal allograft was surgically removed. No disease progression was observed during the 21-month follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Painless hematuria and asymptomatic hydronephrosis occurring after kidney transplantation should raise the possibility of urothelial carcinoma in the kidney graft. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound should be considered as a first-line diagnostic modality because it is easily accessible and does not raise concerns about nephrotoxicity or radiation burden.

TCC in Transplant Ureter--When and When Not to Preserve the Transplant Kidney

We present four cases of transitional cell carcinoma of the transplant ureter (TCCtu). In three cases, localized tumor resection and a variety of reconstructive techniques were possible. Transplant nephrectomy with cystectomy was performed as a secondary treatment in one locally excised case. Transplant nephroureterectomy was performed as primary treatment in one case. The role of oncogenic viruses and genetic fingerprinting to determine the origin of TCCtu are described. Our cases and a systematic literature review illustrate the surgical, nephrological, and oncological challenges of this uncommon but important condition.

Bladder cancer in renal allograft recipients: risk factors and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Solid organ transplant recipients have an increased cancer risk owing to immunosuppression and oncogenic viral infections. We report on the incidence and types of bladder cancer in kidney transplant recipients in Ireland, describing possible additional risk factors and outcomes in these patients.

METHODS

We identified kidney transplant recipients diagnosed with de novo bladder cancer between January 1, 1994, and July 31, 2012, by integrating data from the Irish National Cancer Registry and National Renal Transplant Registry. We calculated the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) and examined patient and tumor characteristics and 1-year survival rate.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were diagnosed with de novo bladder cancer during the study period, representing 0.48% of kidney transplant recipients. The SIR was 2.5 (95% CI, 1.4-4.2; P < .001). The mean interval between transplantation and diagnosis of bladder tumor was 8.6 years and mean age at time of diagnosis was 55.7 years. Sixty percent of patients were male. The tumor types were transitional cell carcinoma (9 patients), squamous cell carcinoma (3 patients), adenocarcinoma (1 patient), carcinoma in situ (1 patient), and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (1 patient). Beside immunosuppression, risk factors associated with bladder cancer were urogenital disease (6 patients), cyclophosphamide exposure (2 patients), BK nephropathy (1 patient), analgesic nephropathy (1 patient), and extensive smoking (1 patient). Eight patients underwent radical cystectomy for invasive tumors, with resection of other pelvic organs in 7 patients. Mortality rate within the first year was 40%.

CONCLUSION

Bladder cancer occurred more commonly in kidney transplant recipients with a predominance of aggressive tumors and a high mortality. In patients with preexisting risk factors such as urologic abnormalities and cyclophosphamide exposure careful assessment before transplantation and vigilant monitoring posttransplantation with a low threshold for cystoscopy may improve outcomes.

[De novo urologic tumors in kidney transplant patients]

CONTEXT

The ability of a transplant recipient to accept a graft depends on the ability of immunosuppressive drugs to regulate the immune system. Such treatments have been associated with tumor promotion and progression.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic literature review was carried out. Electronic searches were performed in PubMed database. The searching criterion was "urological tumors in kidney transplant recipients". The most important issues regarding incidence, urological tumor-specific features, and relevant ones about the treatment are summarized.

SYNTHESIS OF EVIDENCE

In renal transplant, 15% of all tumors are urological neoplasias; furthermore, they are the leading neoplastic cause of death. In transplant population the incidence rate of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), transitional cell bladder carcinoma (TCBC), testicular carcinoma (TC) and prostate cancer are increased 15, 3, 3 and 2 times respectively. Treatments used in transplant patients are similar to those employed in the general population:radical nephrectomy for the native kidney and conservative surgery for the graft are indicated for RCC. Radical prostatectomy is technically feasible for localized PC.Regarding to transitional cell carcinoma BCG or MMC is not contraindicated.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence rate of cancer has increased among transplant population. These tumors can be managed following the same criteria than in general population. Because in this population the prognosis is worse for the immunosuppression, closer monitoring is required.

BK virus-associated urothelial carcinoma of a ureter graft in a renal transplant recipient: a case report

BACKGROUND

Urothelial carcinomas of ureter grafts in renal transplant patients are rare. Here we report our experience with a case of BK virus-associated urothelial carcinoma in a ureter graft.

CASE REPORT

A 47-year-old man developed chronic renal failure secondary to diabetes mellitus and started maintenance hemodialysis in September 2007. Two months later, the patient received a renal transplant from his 70-year-old mother. The patient developed BK virus-associated nephropathy 1 year after transplantation and presented with a decline in renal function and hydronephrosis in the transplanted kidney 4 years 6 months after transplantation. Cystoscopy and retrograde pyelography revealed an irregular filling defect in the ureter graft. Cytologic diagnosis of his urine revealed a high-grade urothelial carcinoma. Computerized tomography showed a cT2 ureteral tumor and no involvement of other organs. The patient subsequently underwent a transplant nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff resection. Histopathologic findings revealed a high-grade urothelial carcinoma, pT2, in the ureter graft with SV40-positive staining. The patient was closely observed without adjuvant chemotherapy therapy and remained disease free 1 year after surgery. Renal transplant recipients with BK virus infection are at high risk of developing urologic malignancies. Close attention is necessary to diagnose post-transplantation urologica malignancies as early as possible.

Male human papillomavirus infection post-kidney transplant: an overlooked disease

While immunosuppressive regimens improve the overall survival of renal transplant recipients, they also contribute to the long-term complications of post-transplant malignancies. Chronic immune suppression in renal transplant recipients (RTR) increases the risk of viral-associated cancers. In male RTR, human papillomavirus (HPV) is implicated in the development of penile, anal, oropharyngeal, and non-melanoma skin carcinomas. Despite the significance of this virus in RTR, there is an overall deficiency in the understanding of the natural history of HPV infection in male RTR. In the next 20 years, it is believed that cancers will be the leading cause of death in kidney transplant recipients. HPV-associated carcinomas are of particular interest since they are sexually transmitted and in theory may be preventable diseases. This commentary highlights some of the progress made in understanding how HPV is transmitted amongst couples in the general population. It also summarizes the current knowledge of HPV infection in male RTR and describes the deficiencies in published medical literature.

Incidence of malignancy after living kidney transplantation: a multicenter study from iran

Malignancy is a common complication after renal transplantation. However, limited data are available on post-transplant malignancy in living kidney transplantation. Therefore, we made a plan to evaluate the incidence and types of malignancies, association with the main risk factors and patient survival in a large population of living kidney transplantation. We conducted a large retrospective multicenter study on 12525 renal recipients, accounting for up to 59% of all kidney transplantation in Iran during 22 years follow up period. All information was collected from observation of individual notes or computerized records for transplant patients. Two hundred and sixty-six biopsy-proven malignancies were collected from 16 Transplant Centers in Iran; 26 different type of malignancy categorized in 5 groups were detected. The mean age of patients was 46.2±12.9 years, mean age at tumor diagnosis was 50.8±13.2 years and average time between transplantation and detection of malignancy was 50.0±48.4 months. Overall tumor incidence in recipients was 2%. Kaposis' sarcoma was the most common type of tumor. The overall mean survival time was 117.1 months (95% CI: 104.9-129.3). In multivariate analysis, the only independent risk factor associated with mortality was type of malignancy. This study revealed the lowest malignancy incidence in living unrelated kidney transplantation.

Malignancy after gastrointestinal augmentation in childhood

INTRODUCTION

To review the incidence and risks of bladder cancer following gastrointestinal augmentations done for congenial anomalies in childhood.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search using PubMed and Ovid Medline search engines was performed. MeSH terms evaluated were; bladder augmentations, enterocystoplasty, gastrocystoplasty, spina bifida, spinal dysraphism, myelodysplasia, neural tube defects, posterior urethral valves and bladder exstrophy were cross referenced with the terms, bladder cancer and urinary bladder neoplasm. All patients who developed a bladder cancer following a bladder augmentation for a congenital anomaly were reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 20 cases of bladder cancer following augmentations for congential anomalies, were identified, 9 arose following ileal cystoplasty, 3 following colocystolasty and 8 following gastrocystoplasty. The incidence of cancer developing per decade following surgery was 1.5% for ileal/colonic and 2.8% for gastric bladder augmentations. The majority of cancers developing within the augmented bladder are at advanced stages at the time of diagnosis (60%; 12/20 cases were ≥T3 at diagnosis). Several of the cases that developed occurred in patients exposed to known carcinogenic stimuli and/or arose in bladders with a known predisposition to carcinoma.

CONCLUSION

Patients augmented with ileal or colonic segment for a congenital bladder anomaly have a 7-8 fold and gastric augments a 14-15 fold increased risk for the development of bladder cancer over standard norms. Published data is however unable to determine if gastrointestinal bladder augmentation is an independent risk factor for cancer over the inherent risk of cancer arising from a congenitally abnormal bladder.

Small cell carcinoma of the bladder in transplant recipients: a report of 2 cases

Small cell carcinoma (SCC) of the urinary bladder is a rare disease accounting for 0.5% to 0.7% of all primary bladder cancers. Transplant recipients are a special subset of patients with increased risk for various urologic malignancies, including transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. However, to the best of our knowledge, a SCC of the urinary bladder has not been reported in transplant recipients. We report what we believe are the first 2 reported cases of transplant recipients with SCC of the bladder. Small cell carcinoma was diagnosed 5 years after transplantation in both patients and they died due to metastatic SCC. Our report emphasizes the highly aggressive nature of SCC and also the rapid progression seen in transplant recipients.

Management of Bladder Cancer following Solid Organ Transplantation

Objective. Present our experience managing bladder cancer following liver and renal transplantation. Methods. Single institution retrospective review of patients diagnosed with bladder urothelial carcinoma (BUC) following solid organ transplantation between January 1992 and December 2007. Results. Of the 2,925 renal and 2,761 liver transplant recipients reviewed, we identified eleven patients (0.2%) following transplant diagnosed with BUC. Two patients with low grade T1 TCC were managed by TURBT. Three patients with CIS and one patient with T1 low grade BUC were treated by TURBT and adjuvant BCG. All four are alive and free of recurrence at a mean follow-up of 51 ± 22 months. One patient with T1 high grade BUC underwent radical cystectomy and remains disease free with a follow-up of 98 months. Muscle invasive TCC was diagnosed in four patients at a median of 3.6 years following transplantation. Two patients are recurrence free at 24 and 36 months following radical cystectomy. Urinary diversion and palliative XRT were performed in one patient with un-resectable disease. Conclusions. Bladder cancer is uncommon following renal and liver transplantation, but it can be managed successfully with local and/or extirpative therapy. The use of intravesical BCG is possible in select immunosuppressed patients.

Development of urological cancers in renal transplant recipients: 30-year experience at the Frankfurt Transplant Center

Fatal post-transplant malignancies with a high proportion of genitourinary neoplasms represent a serious long-term challenge. With continuous improvement of the allograft and patient survival, cancer development after renal transplantation may soon turn to the leading morbidity cause. In a retrospective single-center study of 1990 renal transplant recipients between November 1979 and November 2009, records of patients with urological neoplasms including epidemiological, clinical and survival parameters were accessed. Sixty-six de novo urological malignancies in 58 recipients were recorded in the study period, being most common after skin cancers (15.6% of enregistered tumors). From these, 29 were renal cell cancers, including five neoplasms of transplanted kidney, 24 transitional cell carcinomas, 11 prostate carcinomas, and two germ cell carcinomas with incidence rates of 1.5%, 1.2%, 0.9% and 0.2%, respectively. The patient follow up was virtually complete. Tumor-related death was found in 44% of cases. By multivariate analysis, no influence of either duration of dialysis, mode or duration of immunosuppression, gender or age at transplantation on overall patient survival could be demonstrated. This study, documenting a 30-year single center experience, emphasizes the increased risk for urological neoplasms occuring after renal transplantation. Screening strategies for urological cancers should be optimized.

Augmentation cystoplasty and risk of neoplasia: fact, fiction and controversy

PURPOSE

We determined if ileal/colonic bladder augmentation performed in patients with congenital bladder abnormalities is an independent risk factor for bladder malignancy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed a registry of patients with bladder dysfunction due to neurological abnormalities, exstrophy and posterior urethral valves. Individuals treated with augmentation cystoplasty were matched (1:1) to a control group treated with intermittent catheterization based on etiology of bladder dysfunction, gender and age (±2 years).

RESULTS

We evaluated 153 patients with an ileal/colonic cystoplasty and a matched control population. There was no difference (p=0.54) in the incidence of bladder cancer in patients with augmentation cystoplasty (7 patients [4.6%]) vs controls (4 [2.6%]). In addition, there was no difference between the 2 groups regarding age at diagnosis (51 vs 49.5 years, p>0.7), stage (3.4 vs 3.8, p>0.5), mortality rate (5 of 7 [71%] vs 4 of 4 [100%], p>0.4) or median survival (18 vs 17 months, p>0.8). Irrespective of augmentation status patients with a history of renal transplant on chronic immunosuppression had a significantly higher incidence of bladder cancer (3 of 20 [15%]), compared to patients who were not immunosuppressed (8 of 286 [2.8%], p=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with congenital bladder dysfunction ileal/colonic bladder augmentation does not appear to increase the risk of bladder malignancy over the inherent cancer risk associated with the underlying congenital abnormality. In addition, immunosuppression irrespective of bladder treatment is an independent risk factor for malignancy in this patient population.