Bone density in long term users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate

A rodent model of human dose-equivalent progestin-only implantable contraception

BACKGROUND

Long-acting, reversible contraceptives (LARC; progestin only) are an increasingly common hormonal contraceptive choice in reproductive aged women looking to suppress ovarian function and menstrual cyclicity. The overall objective was to develop and validate a rodent model of implanted etonogestrel (ENG) LARC, at body size equivalent doses to the average dose received by women during each of the first 3 years of ENG subdermal rod LARC use.

METHODS

Intact, virgin, female Sprague-Dawley rats (16-wk-old) were randomized to 1 of 4 groups (n = 8/group) of ENG LARC (high-0.30μg/d, medium-0.17μg/d, low-0.09μg/d, placebo-0.00μg/d) via a slow-release pellet implanted subcutaneously. Animals were monitored for 21 days before and 29 days following pellet implantation using vaginal smears, ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM), saphenous blood draws, food consumption, and body weights. Data were analyzed by chi-square, non-parametric, univariate, and repeated measures 2-way ANOVA.

RESULTS

Prior to pellet implantation there was no difference in time spent in estrus cycle phases among the treatment groups (p > 0.30). Following pellet implantation there was a dose-dependent impact on the time spent in diestrus and estrus (p < 0.05), with the high dose group spending more days in diestrus and fewer days in estrus. Prior to pellet insertion there was not an association between treatment group and estrus cycle classification (p = 0.57) but following pellet implantation there was a dose-dependent association with cycle classification (p < 0.02). Measurements from the UBM (ovarian volume, follicle count, corpora lutea count) indicate an alteration of ovarian function following pellet implantation.

CONCLUSION

Assessment of estrus cyclicity indicated a dose-response relationship in the shift to a larger number of acyclic rats and longer in duration spent in the diestrus phase. Therefore, each dose in this model mimics some of the changes observed in the ovaries of women using ENG LARC and provides an opportunity for investigating the impacts on non-reproductive tissues in the future.

[Contraception for women after 40: CNGOF Contraception Guidelines]

INTRODUCTION

Choosing contraception for women over 40 can be sometimes difficult but it is crucial since fertility and pregnancy's risks still exist. It requires a thorough evaluation of the situation, in order to identify any vascular and metabolic risk factors, along with the uterine and mammary benign pathologies already diagnosed.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review was to elaborate some guidelines for clinical practice regarding contraception's prescription for women over 40.

METHODS

A systematic review of the French and English existing literature was conducted. Pubmed and the Cochrane library were used to identify studies about contraception for perimenopausal women. International guidelines published by scientific societies were also reviewed (RCOG, FSRH, ESHRE, ACOG, WHO, HAS).

RESULTS

No contraceptive methods are contraindicated on the sole basis of age alone. However, because age is a risk factor for vascular and metabolic diseases, combined hormonal contraception and DMPA should not be prescribed at first intention. Copper IUD and progestin-only contraceptives (pill, implant, intrauterine device) should primarily be considered, since they offer good efficacy with lower risks.

CONCLUSIONS

Contraception for women over 40 should not be put aside. Long acting reversible contraception and progestin-only pill have to be prescribed as first-ine. Contraception is no longer needed for women over 50 who use non-hormonal contraception, after a 12 month-amenorrhea. Patients treated with combined hormonal contraception must stop using it over 50. Measuring hormonal levels while using hormonal contraception is not recommended. An hormonal-contraception-free interval must be considered, while using barrier contraception method. If an ovarian activity persists, a non-hormonal contraception or progestin-only contraception (except for DMPA) should be (re-)established.

Bone mineral density in midlife long-term users of hormonal contraception in South Africa: relationship with obesity and menopausal status

BACKGROUND

In South Africa, hormonal contraception is widely used in women over the age of 40 years. One of these methods and the most commonly used is depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) which has been found to have a negative effect on bone mass. Limited information is available on the effect of norethisterone enanthate (NET-EN) on bone mass, and combined oral contraceptives (COCs) have not been found to be associated with loss of bone mass. The aim of this study was to investigate bone mineral density (BMD) in pre and perimenopausal women (40-49 years) in relation to use of DMPA, NET-EN and COCs for at least 12 months preceding recruitment into the study and review associations with body mass index (BMI) and menopausal status.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty seven users of DMPA, 102 NET-EN users and 106 COC users were compared to 161 nonuser controls. Menopausal status was assessed, BMI and forearm BMD was measured at the distal radius using dual X-ray absorptiometry. Comparison analysis was conducted at baseline and 2.5 years.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in BMD between the four contraceptive user groups (p = 0.26) with and without adjustment for age at baseline or at 2.5 years (p = 0.52). The BMD was found to be significantly associated with BMI (p = < 0.0001) with an increase of one unit of BMI translating to an increase of 0.0044 g/cm2 in radius BMD. Follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) level ≥ 25.8 mIU/mL was associated with a decrease of 0.017 g/cm2 in radius BMD relative to women with FSH < 25.8 mIU/mL. Significant interaction between FSH and BMI in their effect on BMD was observed (p = .006).

CONCLUSION

This study found no evidence that long-term use of DMPA, NET-EN and COCs affects forearm BMD in this population at baseline or after 2.5 years of follow-up. This study also reports the complex relationship and significant interaction between FSH and BMI in their effect on BMD. BMD research in older women needs to ensure that women are assessed for menopausal status and BMI.

Computing the Z Score and Centiles for Cross-sectional Analysis: A Practical Approach

Although Z scores have been reported in the literature, one of the problems for the nonstatistician is understanding the systematic approach used to compute the predicted mean and standard deviation, components of the Z score equation, which may vary as the independent variable changes over time (eg, gestational age). This review focuses on a step-by-step analysis using linear, quadratic, and fractional polynomials to compute the mean and standard deviation as a function of a continuous independent variable. Once the mean and standard deviation are computed, the Z score and centile can be derived and Z score calculators created that enable investigators to implement the results in the laboratory and/or clinical setting.

Bone Mineral Density Changes Among Young, Healthy African Women Receiving Oral Tenofovir for HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist on effect of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) when used for preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) on bone mineral density (BMD) in HIV-negative women. We evaluated the effect of daily oral TDF and emtricitabine/TDF compared with placebo on BMD among women enrolled in an HIV-1 PrEP trial.

METHODS

HIV-uninfected women in Uganda and Zimbabwe had BMD measurements of lumbar spine (LS) and total hip (TH) by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at baseline and every 24 weeks for 48 weeks of active treatment and for 48 weeks after discontinuation of study medication. Plasma tenofovir levels were assessed every 12 weeks for the first 48 weeks.

RESULTS

Of 518 women enrolled, 432 had dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry results at baseline and week 48. In the primary analysis, no significant differences in percent BMD change in hip or spine between arms observed, likely because of low product adherence. Among the subset with tenofovir detection in 75%-100% of plasma samples, the mean percent BMD change from baseline to week 48 in the LS was 1.4% lower for TDF or emtricitabine/TDF recipients than for placebo (P = 0.002) and TH BMD was 0.9% lower (P = 0.018). BMD changes from end of active treatment to 48 weeks were significantly greater in the active arm participants compared with placebo participants with a net difference of approximately +0.9% at the LS (P = 0.007) and +0.7% (P = 0.003) at the TH.

CONCLUSIONS

TDF-containing oral PrEP resulted in small but significant reversible decreases in hip and spine BMD among young African women.

Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 3 of 4): Chapter 8 - Progestin-Only Contraception

OBJECTIVE

To provide guidelines for health care providers on the use of contraceptive methods to prevent pregnancy and on the promotion of healthy sexuality.

OUTCOMES

Overall efficacy of cited contraceptive methods, assessing reduction in pregnancy rate, safety, ease of use, and side effects; the effect of cited contraceptive methods on sexual health and general well-being; and the relative cost and availability of cited contraceptive methods in Canada.

EVIDENCE

Published literature was retrieved through searches of Medline and The Cochrane Database from January 1994 to January 2015 using appropriate controlled vocabulary (e.g., contraception, sexuality, sexual health) and key words (e.g., contraception, family planning, hormonal contraception, emergency contraception). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies published in English from January 1994 to January 2015. Searches were updated on a regular basis in incorporated in the guideline to June 2015. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies.

VALUES

The quality of the evidence in this document was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Table 1). CHAPTER 8: PROGESTIN-ONLY CONTRACEPTION: Summary Statements Recommendations.

Prevalence of Low Bone Mass and Osteoporosis in Long-Term Users of the Injectable Contraceptive Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate

BACKGROUND

Bone mineral density (BMD) loss among depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) users is a controversial issue. Aspects under debate include whether the number of years of use has any effect on continuous BMD loss, whether this loss will stabilise over the years of use or if it will progress to low bone mass, osteoporosis and an increased fracture risk. The aim of this study was to compare the difference in osteoporosis and low bone mass between DMPA and copper intrauterine device (Cu-IUD) users.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study that evaluated BMD at the lumbar spine and femoral neck in 47 long-term DMPA users and 41 Cu-IUD users as control group. BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The participants were 27 to 57 years of age, had used either DMPA or a Cu-IUD uninterruptedly for at least ten years, had initiated use of the method prior to 40 years of age and had follicle stimulating hormone values <40 mIU/mL.

RESULTS

Findings showed that 68.1% and 36.6% of the DMPA and Cu-IUD users, respectively, had low bone mass and 29.8% and 2.4% of DMPA and Cu-IUD users, respectively, had osteoporosis. BMD decreased as the number of years of DMPA use increased.

CONCLUSION

Long-term DMPA use was associated with low bone mass and osteoporosis in women who had used the method for 10 years or more. DMPA users with longer time of use showed a greater bone mass loss.

Association between depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA), physical activity and bone health

Physical activity has been advocated for women in the hope of offsetting progestin-only contraceptive-related loss in bone mineral density. There is limited evidence for the beneficial effect of physical activity on bone health of hypo-oestrogenic premenopausal women. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to examine the relationship between physical activity and bone health [as measured by quantitative ultrasound (QUS)] of depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) users, and to investigate whether QUS measurements of DMPA users and non-users differed according to physical activity. Bone health of 48 DMPA users and 48 age-matched controls (22.83 ± 3.2 years) was assessed using calcaneal broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA). Participants were categorised into low and high levels of physical activity based on their exposure to bone-loading exercise. Analysis of covariance was conducted to determine if QUS measurements of DMPA users and non-DMPA users differed within levels of bone-loading physical activity after controlling for body mass index. The duration of DMPA use ranged from 6 to 132 months. Participants' reference bone-loading exposure time averaged 3.3 ± 1.8 years. Data analysis revealed that DMPA users had significantly lower BUA by 6.54 dB/MHz (t (95) = -2.411, p = 0.018) compared to non-users of DMPA. Concurrently high levels of physical activity and DMPA use led to 1.996 dB/MHz decreases in BUA. A cycle of prolonged DMPA use and concurrent engagement in high levels of physical activity appears detrimental to bone health. It is suggested that the lack of oestrogen may counteract the effects of physical activity by inhibiting bone formation in response to mechanical bone-loading.

Injectable and oral contraceptive use and cancers of the breast, cervix, ovary, and endometrium in black South African women: case-control study

BACKGROUND

Oral contraceptives are known to influence the risk of cancers of the female reproductive system. Evidence regarding the relationship between injectable contraceptives and these cancers is limited, especially in black South Africans, among whom injectable contraceptives are used more commonly than oral contraceptives.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We analysed data from a South African hospital-based case-control study of black females aged 18-79 y, comparing self-reported contraceptive use in patients with breast (n = 1,664), cervical (n = 2,182), ovarian (n = 182), and endometrial (n = 182) cancer, with self-reported contraceptive use in 1,492 control patients diagnosed with cancers with no known relationship to hormonal contraceptive use. We adjusted for potential confounding factors, including age, calendar year of diagnosis, education, smoking, alcohol, parity/age at first birth, and number of sexual partners. Among controls, 26% had used injectable and 20% had used oral contraceptives. For current and more recent users versus never users of oral or injectable contraceptives, the odds ratios (ORs) for breast cancer were significantly increased in users of oral and/or injectable contraceptives (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.28-2.16, p<0.001) and separately among those exclusively using oral (1.57, 1.03-2.40, p = 0.04) and exclusively using injectable (OR 1.83, 1.31-2.55, p<0.001) contraceptives; corresponding ORs for cervical cancer were 1.38 (1.08-1.77, p = 0.01), 1.01 (0.66-1.56, p = 0.96), and 1.58 (1.16-2.15, p = 0.004). There was no significant increase in breast or cervical cancer risk among women ceasing hormonal contraceptive use ≥10 y previously (p = 0.3 and p = 0.9, respectively). For durations of use ≥5 y versus never use, the ORs of ovarian cancer were 0.60 (0.36-0.99, p = 0.04) for oral and/or injectable contraceptive use and 0.07 (0.01-0.49, p = 0.008) for injectable use exclusively; corresponding ORs for endometrial cancer were 0.44 (0.22-0.86, p = 0.02) and 0.36 (0.11-1.26, p = 0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, use of oral and of injectable hormonal contraceptives was associated with a transiently increased risk of breast and cervical cancer and, for long durations of use, with a reduced risk of ovarian and endometrial cancer. The observed effects of injectable and of oral contraceptives on cancer risk in this study did not appear to differ substantially.

Update on hormonal contraception and bone density

Combination hormonal contraception and progestin-only contraception (including depot medroxyprogesterone acetate [DMPA]) are effective and convenient forms of reversible contraception that millions of women use worldwide. In recent years, observations of reduced bone mineral density in current users of these methods have led to concerns that this hormone-induced bone loss might translate into long-term increased fracture risk. Special focus has been placed on adolescent users who have not yet attained their peak bone mass as well as perimenopausal users. In 2004, the FDA added a black box warning to DMPA package labeling warning of the risk of significant bone loss and cautioning against long-term use (> 2 years). This article reviews evidence on the use of hormonal contraception and its effect on bone density in adolescent, premenopausal, and perimenopausal populations. Recommendations from reproductive healthcare organizations are reviewed and clinical recommendations are provided.

Inadequate vitamin D status in adolescents with substantial bone mineral density loss during the use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate injectable contraceptive: a pilot study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To examine vitamin D and parathormone (PTH) levels in adolescents who experienced substantial bone mineral density (BMD) loss during depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) use.

DESIGN

A non-randomized, multi-center study, during which DMPA was administered every 12 weeks and evaluation of lumbar spine and hip BMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was conducted every 6 months. A blood sample for vitamin D and PTH measurements was obtained from adolescents who experienced >5% BMD loss. Vitamin D deficiency was defined as 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) level of <20 ng/mL, insufficiency as 25OHD level of 20-30 ng/mL, and sufficiency as 25OHD level of >30 ng/mL.

RESULTS

Evaluation of vitamin D and PTH was carried out in 15 participants who experienced BMD loss of > or = 5% during DMPA use. At initiation of DMPA, participants had mean (+SE) age 17+1 years, gynecologic age 61+4 months, and body mass index 24+1.5 kg/m2. Racial/ethnic distribution was: Caucasian--7 girls, Hispanic--4 girls, African-American--3 girls, and other--1 girl. Six participants had BMD loss of >5% after 2 DMPA injections, five after 3 injections, one after 5 injections, one after 8 injections, one after 10 injections, and one after 13 injections. Only one girl (7%) had sufficient vitamin D. The other participants had vitamin D insufficiency (50%) or deficiency (43%). Participants' mean (+SE) PTH was 22+4 pg/mL (reference range 7-53 pg/mL), and mean (+SE) 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D was 56+5 pg/mL (reference range 22-67 pg/mL).

CONCLUSIONS

Inadequate vitamin D status was evident among the majority of female adolescents who experienced a substantial BMD loss while using DMPA.

Biopsychosocial variables associated with substantial bone mineral density loss during the use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate in adolescents: adolescents who lost 5% or more from baseline vs. those who lost less than 5%

BACKGROUND

It is unclear why some adolescents experience substantial bone mineral density (BMD) loss, while others experience a minimal decrease during depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) use. We examined biopsychosocial factors in adolescents who experienced ≥5% BMD loss from baseline compared with adolescents who experienced <5% BMD loss during DMPA use.

STUDY DESIGN

A multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized study of 181 female adolescents who initiated DMPA for contraception was conducted. BMD (by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) and serum estradiol were measured at initiation and every 6 months for 240 weeks of DMPA use.

RESULTS

Half of participants experienced BMD loss of ≥5% from baseline at the hip, and a quarter experienced BMD loss of ≥5% at the lumbar spine (BMD substantial losers, SL). Hip and lumbar spine BMD-SL received a significantly greater number of DMPA injections than non-SL (p<.001). Decreased estradiol levels did not statistically differ between BMD loss subgroups. Hip BMD-SL had significantly lower baseline body mass index (BMI) than non-SL (p=.002), and there was an inverse relationship between weight gain and degree of BMD loss. Mean calcium intake was significantly lower (p<.05) in hip BMD-SL, and reported alcohol use was significantly higher (p<.05) in lumbar spine BMD-SL compared with non-SL.

CONCLUSIONS

BMD loss of ≥5% was more common at the hip than at the lumbar spine among adolescents using DMPA. Decreased serum estradiol levels did not correlate with magnitude of BMD loss. Lower BMI and calcium intake and greater alcohol use were associated with greater BMD loss in adolescents using DMPA.

Effect of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate on bone density in a Scottish industrial city

OBJECTIVE

To determine if long-term users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate injectable contraception (DMPA) were more likely than their peers to have low bone density.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional observational study.

SETTING

The Domiciliary Family Planning Service, Glasgow, Scotland.

SUBJECTS

Clients of the Domiciliary Service who had used DMPA for contraception for longer than 5 years (mean 12 years) were invited to participate and select their own control, a friend or relative who had never used this method of contraception.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Bone density measured at the hip and lumbar spine by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

RESULTS

DMPA users had a significantly lower bone density than controls, 12-13% less at both hip and lumbar spine. This difference remained even when controlling for parity, smoking, family history of kyphosis or hip fracture, and body mass index.

CONCLUSIONS

DMPA significantly decreases bone density in a group of long-term users with significant social deprivation. The long-term significance of this remains uncertain.

Contraception for the older woman: an update

Although fertility declines with advancing age as the woman approaches the menopause, some risk of pregnancy persists, and effective contraception needs to be offered to avoid an unintended pregnancy. An older woman may have menstrual dysfunction or climacteric symptoms and these factors would need consideration when making the choice of contraception. Low-estrogen dose combined oral contraceptives may be prescribed to healthy non-smoking women up to about 50 years of age. The progestogen-only pill may be an appropriate option in an older woman with declining fertility. The copper intrauterine device is an optimal method for parous women free of pre-existing menstrual problems. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system is considered the contraceptive method of choice for perimenopausal women with menstrual dysfunction. The woman should be provided with individualized advice so that she has a choice between the newer, effective, largely safe, reversible methods and sterilization.

Bone density recovery after depot medroxyprogesterone acetate injectable contraception use

BACKGROUND

While depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) is a highly effective contraceptive used by millions of women, its use is associated with bone mineral density (BMD) loss, raising concerns about long-term risk of osteoporosis and/or fractures.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a systematic review of studies published in PubMed from 1996 to 2006, evaluating changes in BMD after discontinuation of DMPA. Ten primary clinical or observational studies were identified addressing this issue.

RESULTS

BMD consistently returned toward or to baseline values following DMPA discontinuation in women of all ages. This recovery in BMD was seen as early as 24 weeks after stopping therapy and persisted for as long as women were followed up; BMD in past DMPA users was similar to that in nonusers.

CONCLUSIONS

Bone loss occurring with DMPA use is reversible and is not likely to be an important risk factor for low bone density and fractures in older women, although data on fracture risk in DMPA users are lacking.

A three-year longitudinal evaluation of the forearm bone density of users of etonogestrel- and levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implants

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) at baseline and at 18 and 36 months of use of etonogestrel (ENG)-and levonorgestrel (LNG)-releasing contraceptive implants. This is a continuation of a previous study in which BMD was evaluated at baseline and at 18 months of use.

Methods

A total of 111 women, 19–43 years of age, wererandomly allocated to use one of the two implants. At 36 months of follow-up, only 36 and 39 women were still using the ENG- and LNG-releasing implants, respectively. BMD was evaluated at the distal and at the ultra-distal radius of the non-dominant forearm using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Results

There was no difference in the BMD of users of either implant at 18 and at 36 months. BMD was significantly lower at 18 and at 36 months at the distal radius in both groups of users compared to pre-insertion values; however, no difference was found at the ultra-distal radius.

Conclusion

Women 19–43 years of age using either one of these two contraceptive implants for 36 months had lower BMD values at the distal radius compared to pre-insertion values; however, no difference was found at the ultra-distal radius.

Bone status after cessation of use of injectable progestin contraceptives

BACKGROUND

Women using injectable progestin contraceptives (IPCs) have lower bone mineral density than nonusers. We assessed whether bone loss is completely reversible after cessation of IPC use, whether different IPCs have different effects and whether effects vary by age at first use.

STUDY DESIGN

In a cross-sectional study in Cape Town, South Africa, 3487 premenopausal black and mixed race women aged 18-44 years were interviewed for information on contraceptive history and risk factors for decreased bone mineral density, and ultrasound measurements of the left calcaneus were taken. Adjusted means of the ultrasound measures for categories of IPC use were obtained using multivariable linear regression.

RESULTS

Current users of IPCs had the lowest ultrasound measures, while the measures of women who had ceased IPC use at least 2-3 years previously were similar to or greater than those of never users of IPCs. The effects of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and norethisterone enanthate were similar. The calcaneus measures were unrelated to age at which use began after control for confounding factors.

CONCLUSION

The data suggest that bone loss during IPC use is reversible and that this loss of bone is completely recovered several years after cessation of use.

Comprehensive review of conventional and non-conventional methods of management of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis

Recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is a condition what causes women a great deal of discomfort, inconvenience, and sometimes has psychological sequelae.(1) This condition is notoriously difficult to manage. Conventional management is generally favoured by medical practitioners. Some practitioners prefer not to offer other options because of significant possible side-effects and the lack of research supporting alternative treatments. There are many studies and much available information surrounding uncomplicated VVC, including two systematic reviews.(2,3) In the area of recurrent VVC however, quality conclusive studies are scarce, and recurrent VVC is featured infrequently in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Systematic reviews that strongly support a particular pharmacological method of conventional management of recurrent VVC over another are absent from medical literature. Recommendations are largely formed on the basis of scanty RCTs and expert opinion. There is even less conclusive evidence in the area of alternative therapies; yet despite this, anecdotally many practitioners (both alternative and mainstream) continue to advocate certain treatments in the absence of any reliable cure that can be confidently prescribed. As the use of methods other than mainstream medicine becomes more widespread, it is important to be aware of both conventional and non-conventional management of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. Practitioners need to ascertain their patient's preference and treatment history. It is difficult to find comprehensive literature assessing both approaches. Giving women the most up-to-date and relevant information, and different management options, is essential in allowing them to make informed decisions. This review critically assesses both mainstream and less conventional approaches in the management of recurrent VVC.

Bone mineral density in adolescents using norethisterone enanthate, depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate or combined oral contraceptives for contraception

PURPOSE

Most studies have shown a negative effect of depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) on the bone mineral density (BMD) of adolescents. There is no information available on the effect of norethisterone enanthate (NET-EN) on BMD in adolescents and the effect of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) on adolescent BMD is inconclusive. The aim of this longitudinal study was to investigate BMD in adolescent (aged 15-19 years) new users of hormonal contraception (DMPA, NET-EN and COCs).

METHOD

New users of DMPA (n=115), NET-EN (n=115), COCs (n=116) and 144 nonuser controls were recruited. BMD was measured at the distal radius and midshaft of the ulna using dual X-ray absorptiometry.

RESULTS

In total, 275 women were included in this interim analysis and total follow-up time was 553 person-years. There was no significant difference in radius BMD between users of different contraceptive methods at baseline (p=.40). Overall, an increase in radius BMD of 0.00522 per person-year was observed. This result was similar when adjusting for BMI in the random effects regression model (p=.88). The regression model showed that BMI was significantly associated with radius BMD, with each unit increase in BMI corresponding to an increase of 0.0029 g/cm2 in BMD (95% CI 0.0023 to 0.0036, p<.001). Interaction between contraceptive method and follow-up time adjusted for BMI was not significant (p=.07). The increase in BMD for NET-EN users of 0.0013 g/cm2 per person-year (95% CI -0.0017 to 0.0043) was significantly lower than that of nonusers (p=.017). For DMPA and COC users, the increase in BMD was not significantly different compared to the nonusers. This study suggests that NET-EN users had lower increase in BMD over time compared to the other user groups.

Bone mineral density in users of two kinds of once-a-month combined injectable contraceptives

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this descriptive study was to compare bone mineral density (BMD) between users of two kinds of once-a-month combined injectable contraceptives (CICs) and control subjects.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional descriptive study included 97 women aged between 20 and 45 years using CICs containing either 25 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate and 5 mg of estradiol cypionate for 12-82 months or 50 mg of norethindrone enanthate and 5 mg of estradiol valerate for 12-60 months, matched by age (+/-1 year) and body mass index (BMI; kg/m(2)) (+/-1) with users of the TCu 380A intrauterine device as control subjects. BMD was evaluated at the midshaft of the ulna and at the distal section of the radius of the nondominant forearm using double X-ray absorptiometry.

RESULTS

There was no difference in BMD between users of either CIC and nonusers at either section of the forearm studied. There was also no difference in BMD between users of the two CICs at either section of the forearm.

CONCLUSIONS

Women aged between 20 and 45 years, currently using one of these two kinds of CICs, presented BMDs similar to those of control subjects paired by age and BMI.

Bone mineral density in women aged 25–35 years receiving depot medroxyprogesterone acetate: recovery following discontinuation

INTRODUCTION

This 7-year, prospective, matched-cohort, clinical study evaluated the effects of intramuscular depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) (150 mg/mL) on bone mineral density (BMD) in women aged 25-35 years.

METHODS

Bone mineral density changes in new DMPA-IM users (n=248) were compared with those in women using nonhormonal contraception (n=360) for up to 240 weeks of treatment and 96 weeks of posttreatment follow-up (in subjects receiving >or=1 dose).

RESULTS

At week 240 of treatment, mean percentage changes from baseline in DMPA-IM vs. nonhormonal subjects were: -5.16% (n=21) vs. +0.19% (n=65), total hip (p<.001); -5.38% (n=33) vs. +0.43% (n=105), lumbar spine (p<.001). At week 96 posttreatment, these values were: -0.20% (n=25) vs. +0.84% (n=43), total hip (p=.047); -1.19% (n=41) vs. +0.47% (n=66), lumbar spine (p=.017).

CONCLUSIONS

These results show BMD declines during DMPA-IM use; following discontinuation, significant increases in BMD occur through 96 weeks posttreatment.

Effects of the long-term use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate as hormonal contraceptive on bone mineral density and biochemical markers of bone remodeling

PURPOSE AND METHOD

Our objective is to evaluate the effects of the long-term use of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) as a method of contraception on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone remodeling. Forty women (21-44 years old) who used DMPA for contraception for <1, 1-2 and >5 years, in addition to 20 age-matched healthy women (nonusers), participated in this study. Lumbar spine BMD (LS-BMD) was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptionmetry. Serum osteocalcin (OC), a bone formation marker, was measured by enzyme amplification sorbent immunoassay. Urinary deoxypyridinoline (DPD), a bone resorption marker, was determined by enzyme immunoassay.

RESULTS

Serum OC and urinary DPD levels in women who used DMPA for <1, 1-2 and >5 years were significantly increased compared to the corresponding levels in nonusers. The increase of both biomarkers was more pronounced with longer duration of use. LS-BMD was significantly decreased in women on long-term DMPA use compared to LS-BMD in nonusers. The mean percentage decrease of LS-BMD in women who used DMPA for 1-2 and >5 years was 9% and 11.8%, respectively. LS-BMD was negatively correlated with serum OC and urinary DPD in women who used DMPA. On the other hand, LS-BMD and bone turnover were not significantly different between women who used DMPA for <1 year and nonusers.

CONCLUSION

Long-term use of DMPA (>2 years) had a significant adverse effect on BMD and induced increased bone turnover, as evidenced by a significant increase in biochemical indices of bone formation and resorption. The measurement of LS-BMD and of biomarkers of bone turnover may be recommended in women aged above 40 years and who used DMPA for a long duration (2-5 years).

Progestogen-only contraception and bone mineral density: a systematic review

Questions have been raised about the effects of progestogen-only contraceptive use on bone health, particularly among young women who have not yet reached peak bone mass and perimenopausal women who may be starting to lose bone mass. We conducted a systematic review that evaluated the association between progestogen-only contraceptive use and fracture risk or bone mineral density (BMD). We identified 39 articles from MEDLINE and EMBASE, published through July 2005. One study reported that depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) users were more likely to experience stress fractures than nonusers; this association was not statistically significant after controlling for baseline bone density. In cross-sectional studies, the mean BMD in DMPA users was usually below that of nonusers, but within 1 SD. In longitudinal studies, BMD generally decreased more over time among DMPA users than among nonusers, but women gained BMD upon discontinuation of DMPA. Limited evidence suggested that use of progestogen-only contraceptives other than DMPA did not affect BMD.

A cross-sectional study of the forearm bone density of long-term users of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system

BACKGROUND

There are concerns about the effect of hormonal contraceptives on bone mineral density (BMD), but there is currently no information available on the effect of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) on BMD. The objective of this study was to compare the BMD of LNG-IUS users with that of controls using the TCu380A intrauterine device (IUD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study paired 53 women, aged 25-51 years, who had been using the LNG-IUS for 7 years, with 53 IUD users, according to age (+/-1 year) and body mass index (BMI; kg/m2) (+/-1). BMD was evaluated at the midshaft of the ulna and the distal radius of the nondominant forearm using double X-ray absorptiometry.

RESULTS

Mean age of women was 34 years. BMI was slightly over 25 in both groups. Estradiol was normal. Mean BMD was 0.469 +/- 0.008 and 0.467 +/- 0.009 and 0.409 +/- 0.009 and 0.411 +/- 0.009 at the midshaft of the ulna and distal radius in LNG-IUS and IUD users, respectively, without significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Women aged 25-51 years, using the LNG-IUS for 7 years, had a mean BMD similar to that of the control group of TCu380A IUD users.

Advances in the management of endometriosis: an update for clinicians

Endometriosis is a chronic and recurrent disease characterized by the presence and proliferation of endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity, which occurs in approximately 10% of women of reproductive age. In this estrogen-dependent disorder, lesions become inactive and gradually undergo regression during states of ovarian down-regulation, such as amenorrhoea or menopause. The impact of endometriosis includes impaired fertility potential, as well as symptoms of dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia and chronic non-menstrual pain, all of which adversely affect quality of life. Management of endometriosis focuses on pain relief and includes medical and surgical treatment. Pharmacologic therapies currently in use include combination oral contraceptives (COCs), danazol, GnRH analogues and progestins. Although some agents show efficacy in relieving pain, all differ in their side effects, making it difficult to achieve a balance between efficacy and safety. Efficacy has been demonstrated with danazol or GnRH analogues; however, treatment is limited to 6 months because of significant metabolic side effects. Alternatives for longer-term management of symptoms include add-back therapy with GnRH analogues, COCs or progestins. Newer options for treatment of endometriosis include depot medroxyprogesterone acetate subcutaneous injection, as well as several agents under investigation that may prove to have therapeutic potential.

A prospective study of the forearm bone density of users of etonorgestrel- and levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implants

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to compare bone mineral density (BMD) before insertion and at 18 months of use of etonorgestrel- and levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implants.

METHODS

One hundred and eleven women, 19-43 years of age, were randomly allocated to two groups: 56 to etonorgestrel and 55 to levonorgestrel. BMD was evaluated at the midshaft of the ulna and at the distal radius of the non-dominant forearm using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry before insertion and at 18 months of use.

RESULTS

There was no difference in baseline demographic or anthropometric characteristics, or in BMD of users of either model of implant. BMD was significantly lower at 18 months of use at the midshaft of the ulna in both groups of users. However, no difference was found at the distal radius. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the variables associated with BMD at 18 months of use in both implant groups were baseline BMD, body mass index (BMI) and difference in BMI (0 versus 18 months of use).

CONCLUSIONS

Women of 19-43 years of age using either one of the implants showed lower BMD at 18 months of use at the midshaft of the ulna, however, without a difference at the distal radius.

Effects of oral contraceptives on bone mineral density

Osteoporosis is a major health problem that leads to a high incidence of spine, radial, and hip fractures. It is now well recognized that a chronically hypoestrogenic state increases bone turnover that, in turn, causes a critical decrease in bone mineral density (BMD), an important determinant of fracture risk. During the premenopausal period, hypogonadism can have deleterious effects on skeletal health by reducing peak bone mass or inducing precocious bone loss. In young women, hypothalamic amenorrhea, caused by gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulsatility dysregulation, is often associated with bone loss. Although the relationship between hypothalamic amenorrhea and bone density is not completely understood, the most plausible intervention for this disorder at the moment seems to be the use of hormone replacement. Oral contraceptives are associated with an improvement in BMD if assumed upon the onset of anovulatory cycles and, therefore, estrogen deficiency, but confer no benefit in healthy women with normal ovarian function. In perimenopausal oligomenorrheic women, the use of oral contraceptives seems to have bone-sparing effects. In conclusion, the protective role of oral contraceptives on bone density is biologically plausible, since this treatment represents a replacement therapy with continuous exposure to exogenous estrogens.

Bone mineral density in women aged 40–49 years using depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate, norethisterone enanthate or combined oral contraceptives for contraception

Most studies show that depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) has a negative effect on bone mass. There are conflicting reports with respect to recovery of bone mass with long-term use of DMPA. No information is available on the effect of norethisterone enanthate (NET-EN) on bone mass, and combined oral contraceptives (COCs) have not been found to be associated with loss of bone mass. The aim of this study was to investigate bone mineral density (BMD) in older women (40-49 years) in relation to use of DMPA, NET-EN and COCs for at least 12 months preceding recruitment into the study. One-hundred twenty-seven users of DMPA, 102 NET-EN users and 106 COC users were compared to 161 nonuser controls. Bone mineral density was measured at the distal radius and midshaft of the ulna using dual X-ray absorptiometry. There was no significant difference in BMD between the four contraceptive user groups (p=.26) with and without adjustment for age. Although a small decrease in BMD was noted in the age range of 40-49 years, this was not statistically significant (p=.7). The BMD was found to be significantly associated with body mass index (BMI) (p<or=.0001) at both measurement sites, with an increase of one unit of BMI translating to an increase of 0.0044 g/cm2 in radius BMD. Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level >or=25.8 mIU/mL was associated with a decrease of 0.017 g/cm2 in radius BMD relative to women with FSH <25.8 mIU/mL. Significant interaction between FSH and BMI in their effect on BMD was observed (p=.006). This study found no evidence that long-term use of DMPA, NET-EN and COCs affects BMD in this population.

Bone mineral density changes over two years in first-time users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate

OBJECTIVE

To compare longitudinal changes in bone mineral density (BMD) among first-time depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) users to women using no hormonal contraception, and evaluate user characteristics associated with that BMD change.

DESIGN

Prospective longitudinal study.

SETTING

Healthy volunteers in an academic research environment.

PATIENT(S)

Women, aged 18 to 35, choosing DMPA for contraception (n = 178) and women using no hormonal contraception (n = 145).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Hip and spine BMD measured, at three-month intervals for 24 months, by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry.

RESULT(S)

Mean hip BMD declined 2.8% (SE = 0.034) 12 months following DMPA initiation and 5.8% (SE = 0.096) after 24 months. Mean spine (L1-L3) BMD declined 3.5% (SE = 0.022) and 5.7% (SE = 0.034), respectively, after one and two years of DMPA use. Mean hip and spine BMD of control participants changed less than 0.9% over the same period. Among DMPA users, body mass index (BMI) change was inversely associated with BMD change at the hip, but not at the spine. Calcium intake, physical activity, and smoking did not influence BMD change in either group.

CONCLUSION(S)

Hip and spine BMD declined after one DMPA injection and this decline continued with each subsequent injection for 24 months. With the exception of increasing BMI among DMPA users, no user characteristics offered protection against DMPA-related BMD loss.

Bone mineral density in lymphangioleiomyomatosis

Estrogen deficiency and pulmonary diseases are associated with bone mineral density (BMD) loss. Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM), a disorder affecting women that is characterized by cystic lung lesions, is frequently treated with antiestrogen therapy, i.e., progesterone and/or oophorectomy. Therefore, we evaluated BMD yearly in 211 LAM patients to determine the prevalence of BMD abnormalities, whether antiestrogen therapy decreased BMD, and if treatment with bisphosphonates prevented bone loss. Abnormal BMD was found in 70% of the patients and correlated with severity of lung disease and age. Greater severity of lung disease, menopause, and oophorectomy were associated with greater decline in BMD. After adjusting for differences in initial lung function and BMD, we found similar rates of BMD decline in progesterone-treated (n = 122) and untreated patients (n = 89). After similar adjustments, we found that bisphosphonate-treated patients (n = 98) had lower rates of decline in lumbar spine BMD (-0.004 +/- 0.003 vs. -0.015 +/- 0.003 gm/cm(2), p = 0.036) and T-scores (-0.050 +/- 0.041 vs. -0.191 +/- 0.041, p < 0.001) than untreated patients (n = 113). We conclude that abnormal BMD was frequent in LAM. Progesterone therapy was not associated with changes in BMD; bisphosphonate therapy was associated with lower rates of bone loss. We recommend systematic evaluation of BMD and early treatment with bisphosphonates for patients with LAM.

Canadian Contraception Consensus

This document has been archived because it contains outdated information. It should not be consulted for clinical use, but for historical research only. Please visit the journal website for the most recent guidelines.

The association between depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception and bone mineral density in adolescent women

Although adolescent women are actively acquiring bone, there has been little study of the possible effects of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) injectable contraception use on bone density in adolescents. We conducted a cross-sectional evaluation of the association between DMPA use and bone mineral density in adolescent women, ages 14-18 years. Of 174 study participants, 81 were DMPA users (range, 1-13 injections, median = 3) and 93 were not. Mean bone density at all anatomic sites (hip, spine and whole body) was lower for DMPA users than nonusers, but differences were not statistically significant (e.g., hip, 0.940 vs. 0.970 g/cm2, p = 0.10; spine, 0.970 vs. 0.992 g/cm2, p = 0.19). Duration of DMPA use showed a trend toward lower spine bone density (p-value for trend = 0.06). This study did not find a strong association between DMPA use and bone density. Further prospective evaluation of bone density changes with DMPA use and after DMPA discontinuation are needed in this age group.

Bone densitometry in premenopausal women: synthesis and review

Bone loss prior to menopause is being increasingly identified in women. Clearly, low bone mineral density (BMD) is a significant risk factor for fracture in the estrogen-deficient female postmenopause. The significance of low bone density prior to menopause needs to be addressed. Low bone density in the premenopausal female may reflect attainment of a lower peak bone mass. It may also be secondary to progressive bone loss following achievement of peak bone density. The etiology of low bone density in the premenopausal female needs to be clarified with meticulous exclusion of secondary causes of bone loss. Menstrual status is an important determinant of peak bone mass as well as the development of bone loss in women prior to the onset of menopause. Subclinical decreases in circulating gonadal steroids may be associated with a lower peak bone mass as well as progressive bone loss in otherwise reproductively normal women. Elevations of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) of greater than 20 miu/L are associated with evidence of increased bone turnover marker activity and correlate with progressive bone loss in perimenopausal women. This transitional period requires further study with respect to the magnitude of bone loss experienced and the potential benefits of antiresorptive therapy. Detailed assessment of menstrual status is necessary in the evaluation of low bone density in premenopausal women. The majority of the cross-sectional and longitudinal studies completed evaluating BMD in the premenopausal years suggest that minimal bone loss does occur prior to menopause after attainment of peak bone mass. The magnitude of premenopausal bone loss, however, is controversial and may be site-dependent. More rapid rates of bone loss are seen in the transitional period beginning 2-3 yr prior to the onset of menopause. Prospective data are needed to understand further the relationship between BMD and fracture in the premenopausal period. Women with steroid-induced bone loss as well as other secondary causes of osteoporosis respond to antiresorptive therapy with documented improvements in BMD. Biomarkers can identify perimenopausal women with increased bone turnover. Lifestyle modification can improve BMD in the pre- and the perimenopausal period. Antiresorptive therapy has not been evaluated in pre- or perimenopausal women with low BMD in the absence of secondary causes of osteoporosis. As new treatment options are evaluated and become available, biomarker assessment may be of value in identifying women at risk of fracture.

Overview on the effects of progestins on bone

In view of the fact that fractures are the clinically relevant events, risk factors for fractures are discussed first. Bone mineral density (BMD) appears to be a much less important risk factor for the most severe hip fractures than the risk of falling. No results of experimental studies on hormones and fractures at advanced age are available. An overview of the effects of progestins on bone is given. Effects of progestins on bone have been studied by in vitro experiments using cell lines and by more relevant clinical observations. Prospective studies have been conducted following the use of progestins contained in oral contraceptives, alone or in combination with oestrogens; long-term contraception by injection of depot preparations; so-called "add-back" hormonal therapy attempting to reverse the adverse effects of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists on bone and after different regimens of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in postmenopausal women. From the data there are no indications that the various progestins, used in clinical practice, have either a bone-protective or an oestrogen antagonistic activity. Progestins do not add or subtract much of the protective action of oestrogens on the bones.

Controversies in adolescent hormonal contraception

Unintended pregnancy and abortion rates among US adolescents remain high although hormonal contraception is safe and effective in this population. Controversies affecting the provision of hormonal contraception for adolescents include the side effects of oral contraceptives, the possibility that progestin-only injectables lead to decreased bone health, and debate as to whether emergency contraception should be available to teens without a prescription. Each of these issues is addressed with a review of relevant literature.

A randomized controlled trial of estrogen replacement therapy in long-term users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate

Long-term use of the injectable contraceptive depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA, Depo-Provera) is associated with a reduction in bone mineral density (BMD), particularly in the lumbar spine. The cause of DMPA-associated bone loss is not known, but the relative estrogen deficiency induced by DMPA use could be responsible. We have undertaken a randomized, double-blind controlled trial of oral estrogen replacement therapy in 38 premenopausal women (mean age 37) with a minimum 2 yr DMPA use who had a below average baseline lumbar spine BMD (T score < or = 0). Nineteen women were allocated to receive conjugated estrogens (0.625 mg/d orally) and 19 to receive a matching placebo. All continued with regular DMPA injections throughout the study. Areal bone density was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total body sites every 6 months for 2 yr; the main outcome measure being the change in areal BMD at the lumbar spine. At baseline, the two groups were well matched for demographic, anthropometric, and biochemical variables, and for BMD. Twenty-seven subjects completed at least 18 months in the study, and 26 the full 2 yr, with similar numbers dropping out from each group (mainly for personal reasons). In the estrogen-treated group, mean lumbar spine BMD increased 1%, whereas in the placebo group it fell 2.6%, over 2 yr. The between group differences were 2.0% at 12 months (P = 0.058), 3.2% at 18 months (P < 0.01), and 3.5% at 24 months (P < 0.002). Differences of lesser statistical magnitude were seen at the femoral neck (between group differences at 2 yr: 2.7%, P = 0.24), Ward's triangle (5.0%, P = 0.055), greater trochanter (3.6%, P = 0.056), total body (1.3%, P = 0.046), legs (1.3%, P = 0.065), and trunk (2.0%, P = 0.029). There were no major adverse events. These data support the view that the likely cause of DMPA-associated bone loss is estrogen deficiency and demonstrate that it can be arrested by estrogen replacement therapy.

Adolescent endometriosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Endometriosis can exist in the adolescent female. It can be a very disruptive disease and cause significant dysfunction at a time in life when self-esteem, school attendance, and school performance are critical to achievement of life goals. Approaches to diagnosis and management in the recent literature are reviewed, focusing on those that apply directly to the adolescent or indirectly, by extrapolation from work done in the adult population. Practical strategies for adolescent patient care are presented.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent research has focused on the efficacy of current treatment modalities and management of potential adverse side effects. Possible etiologies of endometriosis have been proposed, and therapies directed at those causes are being explored. Methods of diagnosis, both invasive and noninvasive, have been studied in order to determine the most effective way of diagnosing the disease.

SUMMARY

A better understanding of the etiology of endometriosis would probably assist in determining the most suitable treatment strategies. Future work in adolescent endometriosis should focus on developing safe, minimally invasive, yet definitive options for diagnosis and treatment.