Regional variation in the sensitivity of longitudinal smooth muscle to histamine at H1-receptors in guinea-pig ileum and colon

Disturbance of the prejunctional modulation of cholinergic neurotransmission during chronic granulomatous inflammation of the mouse ileum

The effect of chronic granulomatous inflammation of the intestine was studied on the prejunctional modulation of cholinergic nerve activity in the mouse ileum. Contractions to carbachol (0.01 - 0.3 microM) and to electrical field stimulation (EFS, 0.25 - 8 Hz) of enteric neurons were higher in inflamed ileum as compared to control ileum. However, when the neurally-mediated contractions to EFS were expressed as percentage of the direct smooth muscle contraction to carbachol, the responses to EFS were similar in control and inflamed ileum. Atropine (1 microM) abolished all contractions to EFS and carbachol in control and inflamed ileum. DMPP (3 - 30 microM), a nicotinic receptor agonist, induced concentration-dependent contractions that were more pronounced in inflamed ileum as compared to control ileum. Hexamethonium (100 microM), a nicotinic receptor blocker, significantly inhibited the contractions to EFS in inflamed ileum but not in control ileum. In control ileum, histamine (10 - 100 microM) and the histamine H(1) receptor agonist HTMT (3 - 10 microM) inhibited the contractions to EFS concentration-dependently without affecting the contractions to carbachol. The inhibitory effect of histamine and HTMT was prevented by the histamine H(1) antagonist mepyramine (5 - 10 microM) but not by the H(2)- and H(3)-receptor antagonists cimetidine and thioperamide (both 10 microM). In chronically inflamed ileum however, histamine (10 - 100 microM) and HTMT (3 - 10 microM) failed to inhibit the contractions to EFS. The histamine H(2) and H(3) receptor agonists dimaprit and R(-)-alpha-methylhistamine did not affect the contractions to EFS in control and inflamed ileum. The alpha(2)-receptor agonist UK 14.304 (0.01 - 0.1 microM) inhibited the contractions to EFS in control and inflamed ileum without affecting the contractions to carbachol. The effect of UK 14.304 was reversed by the alpha(2)-receptor antagonist yohimbine (1 microM). The inhibitory effect of UK 14.304 on contractions to EFS was of similar potency in control and inflamed ileum. Our results suggest that the prejunctional modulation of cholinergic nerve activity by nicotinic and histaminic H(1) receptors is disturbed during chronic intestinal inflammation whereas the modulation by alpha(2)-receptors is preserved. Such a disturbance of cholinergic nerve activity may contribute to the motility disturbances that are often observed during chronic intestinal diseases in humans.

Effects of histamine H1-, H2- and H3-receptor selective drugs on the mechanical activity of guinea-pig small and large intestine

1. In this study we have evaluated the possible contribution of acetylcholine release in histamine-induced contractions of guinea-pig large and small intestinal smooth muscle. Moreover, the presence of the histamine receptor types involved in smooth muscle relaxations and inhibition of electrically-induced twitches was studied by use of several selective agents. 2. Histamine-induced contractions appeared to be a pure H1-receptor-mediated effect. Responses were not attenuated by the presence of 0.1 microM atropine and were competitively and stereoselectively inhibited by the two enantiomers of chlorpheniramine with pA2 values of 6.73 +/- 0.08, 7.30 +/- 0.06, 6.93 +/- 0.03 and 7.19 +/- 0.04 for the L-isomer and 8.63 +/- 0.09, 8.85 +/- 0.09, 9.01 +/- 0.16 and 0.11 for the D-isomer in the duodenum, jejunum, ileum and colon, respectively. 3. There appeared to be a marked regional difference in sensitivity to histamine. In ileal and jejunal preparations pD2 values of 6.24 +/- 0.06 (n = 22) and 6.37 +/- 0.07 (n = 22) were found, whereas the pD2 values in the duodenum and colon were 5.55 +/- 0.05 (n = 36) and 5.68 +/- 0.06 (n = 31) respectively. 4. This regional difference in sensitivity to histamine was not due to variations in receptor affinity since pA2 values for the two enantiomers of chlorpheniramine did not differ markedly among the four tested preparations. Since a similar variation in sensitivity was found for methacholine, it is likely that the signal transfer mechanism in guinea-pig ileum and jejunum is more efficient than in the duodenum and colon. 5. The H2-agonists dimaprit and impromidine relaxed methacholine-precontracted (+/- 70% of maximum contraction) intestine at high concentrations (pD2 values of 3.79 + 0.03 and 4.44 + 0.09 for the jejunum). These relaxations could not be antagonized by 0.1 microM tiotidine, famotidine or mifentidine and were observed in all parts of the intestine investigated. 6. The dimaprit analogues nordimaprit and homodimaprit (inactive at H2-receptors) were equipotent in relaxing the methacholine-precontracted smooth muscle. Since several H2-antagonists were also able to produce relaxations, we do not consider these relaxations to be mediated by a H2-receptor subtype, but to be due to some nonspecific effects at the high concentrations used. 7. The histamine receptor involved in the inhibition of electrically-induced contractions in the presence of atropine could be classified as an H3-receptor effect. In all parts of the intestine the H3-agonist R-alpha-amethylhistamine inhibited the twitches with pD2 values ranging from 8.10 + 0.06 (ileum) to 8.27 + 0.03(colon). This effect was competitively antagonized with the selective H3-antagonist thioperamine (pA2 values are 8.09 + 0.07, 8.13 + 0.05, 8.15 + 0.04 and 8.36 + 0.04 in duodenum, jejunum, ileum and colon, respectively. 8. The guinea-pig intestine is a suitable preparation for the evaluation of either H1- or H3-receptor effects. H2-receptors, causing smooth muscle relaxation appear not to be present in our preparations. At high concentrations of H2-receptor agents (agonists and antagonists) relaxations might be observed, due to unknown nonspecific effects.

Histamine receptors: subclasses and specific ligands

In this review the three main types of histamine receptors are discussed together with their specific ligands. For the classical H1-receptors much emphasis is put on the mechanism by which the receptor is stimulated. For the H1- and H2-receptor the review includes information on the several models available for establishing agonistic or antagonistic activity. In the section on the H3-receptor the ligands are discussed as well as the possible physiological role of this receptor. In the final paragraphs some less well defined activities are presented.