Immediate post-resection diabetes mellitus after pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence and risk factors

Mapping global new-onset, worsening, and resolution of diabetes following partial pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Partial pancreatectomy, commonly used for chronic pancreatitis, or pancreatic lesions, has diverse impacts on endocrine and metabolism system. The study aims to determine the global prevalence of new-onset, worsening, and resolution of diabetes following partial pancreatectomy.

METHODS

The authors searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to October, 2023. DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model with Logit transformation was used. Sensitivity analysis, meta-regression, and subgroup analysis were employed to investigate determinants of the prevalence of new-onset diabetes.

RESULTS

A total of 82 studies involving 13 257 patients were included. The overall prevalence of new-onset diabetes after partial pancreatectomy was 17.1%. Univariate meta-regression indicated that study size was the cause of heterogeneity. Multivariable analysis suggested that income of country or area had the highest predictor importance (49.7%). For subgroup analysis, the prevalence of new-onset diabetes varied from 7.6% (France, 95% CI: 4.3-13.0) to 38.0% (UK, 95% CI: 28.2-48.8, P <0.01) across different countries. Patients with surgical indications for chronic pancreatitis exhibited a higher prevalence (30.7%, 95% CI: 21.8-41.3) than those with pancreatic lesions (16.4%, 95% CI: 14.3-18.7, P <0.01). The type of surgical procedure also influenced the prevalence, with distal pancreatectomy having the highest prevalence (23.7%, 95% CI: 22.2-25.3, P <0.01). Moreover, the prevalence of worsening and resolution of preoperative diabetes was 41.1 and 25.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative diabetes has a relatively high prevalence in patients undergoing partial pancreatectomy, which calls for attention and dedicated action from primary care physicians, specialists, and health policy makers alike.

Pancreatic duct stones treated by Whipple as a last resort: A case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Chronic Pancreatitis is an irreversible inflammation of the pancreas that can lead to fibrosis and scar formation. Pseudocysts are a late complication of chronic pancreatitis and abdominal pain is the most common presenting complaint.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 48-year-old male who is a known case of chronic pancreatitis presented to our department complaining of abdominal pain for a duration of three weeks. A CT scan revealed a pseudocyst in the head of the pancreas, stones in the unicate process along with dilatation of the body and tail of the pancreas.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

After multiple ERCP failures and considering other endoscopic options, the patient was indicated for the Whipple procedure with Roux-en-y reconstruction. Postoperatively, the patient stayed in the hospital for about a week. He was asymptomatic and well but had an elevated random blood sugar level. He was discharged and recommended to follow up with an endocrinologist.

CONCLUSION

Whipple procedure can be used for patients with multiple pancreatic duct stones when endoscopic therapies are not effective.

Functional sequelae after pancreatic resection for cancer

The morbidity and mortality of pancreatic cancer surgery has seen substantial improvement due to the standardization of surgical techniques, the optimization of perioperative multidisciplinary management and the organization of specialized care systems. The identification and treatment of postoperative functional and nutritional sequelae have thereby become major issues in patients who undergo pancreatic surgery. This review addresses the functional sequelae of pancreatic resection for cancerous and pre-cancerous lesions (excluding chronic pancreatitis). Its aim is to specify the prevalence and severity of sequelae according to the type of pancreatic resection and to document, where appropriate, the therapeutic management. Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (ExPI) is observed in nearly one out of three patients at one year after surgery, and endocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EnPI) is present in one out of five patients after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and one out of three patients after distal pancreatectomy (DP). In addition, digestive functional disorders may appear, such as delayed gastric emptying (DGE), which affects 10 to 45% of patients after PD and nearly 8% after DP. Beyond these functional sequelae, pancreatic surgery can also induce nutritional and vitamin deficiencies secondary to a lack of uptake for certain vitamins or to the loss of absorption site in the duodenum. In addition to the treatment of ExPI with oral pancreatic enzymes, nutritional management is based on a high-calorie, high-protein diet with normal lipid intake in frequent small feedings, combined with vitamin supplementation adapted to monitored deficiencies. Better knowledge of the functional consequences of pancreatic cancer surgery can improve the overall management of patients.

Special clinical scenarios in RPS: Involvement of great vessels and pancreas and penetration across natural foramina

The primary treatment for retroperitoneal sarcomas is surgery. This requires a carefully planned, typically multivisceral, resection. A few complex scenarios that may arise include vascular involvement, pancreatic involvement, or herniation of the tumor into another compartment outside of the retroperitoneum. These scenarios must be anticipated before surgery to optimize preoperative preparation, minimize postoperative morbidity and mortality, and improve oncologic outcomes. Our aim is to highlight these clinically challenging anatomic presentations that can be encountered in patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas.

The unique pathophysiological features of diabetes mellitus secondary to total pancreatectomy: proposal for a new classification distinct from diabetes of the exocrine pancreas

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes of the exocrine pancreas (DEP; a.k.a. pancreatic diabetes or pancreatogenic diabetes or type 3c diabetes mellitus or T3cDM) refers to different diabetes types resulting from disorders of the exocrine pancreas. DEP is characterized by the structural and functional loss of glucose-normalizing insulin secretion in the context of exocrine pancreatic dysfunction. Among these forms, new-onset diabetes mellitus secondary to total pancreatectomy (TP) has unique pathophysiological and clinical features, for which we propose a new nomenclature such as post-total pancreatectomy diabetes mellitus (PTPDM).

AREAS COVERED

TP results in the complete loss of pancreatic parenchyma, with subsequent absolute insulinopenia and lifelong need for exogenous insulin therapy. Patients with PTPDM also exhibit deficiency of glucagon, amylin and pancreatic polypeptide. These endocrine abnormalities, coupled with increased peripheral insulin sensitivity, deficiency of pancreatic enzymes and TP-related modifications of gastrointestinal anatomy, can lead to marked glucose variability and increased risk of iatrogenic (insulin-induced) severe hypoglycemic episodes ('brittle diabetes').

EXPERT OPINION

We believe that diabetes mellitus secondary to TP should not be included in the DEP spectrum in light of its peculiar pathophysiological and clinical features. Therefore, we propose a new classification for this entity, that would likely provide more accurate prognosis and treatment strategies.

Pancreatogenic Diabetes after Partial Pancreatectomy: A Common and Understudied Cause of Morbidity

BACKGROUND

Partial pancreatic resection is a known risk factor for new-onset pancreatogenic diabetes mellitus (P-DM). The long-term incidence of P-DM and its clinical impact after partial pancreatic resection remains unknown. The primary objective of this study is to determine the long-term incidence of P-DM and its clinical impact after partial pancreatic resection.

STUDY DESIGN

The Medicare 100% Standard Analytic File (2013 to 2017) was queried for all patients who underwent partial pancreatic resection (pancreaticoduodenectomy, distal pancreatectomy). The primary outcome was the development of postoperative P-DM after surgery.

RESULTS

Among 4,255 patients who underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy, with a median follow-up of 10.8 months, the incidence of P-DM was 20.3% (n=863) and occurred at a median of 3.6 months after surgery. For patients with at least a 3-year follow-up, 32.2% of patients developed P-DM. Risk factors for developing P-DM included male sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.32, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.54), undergoing a distal pancreatectomy (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.68 to 2.35), having a malignant diagnosis (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.34 to 2.04), a family history of diabetes (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.43 to 2.97; all p < 0.001), and being classified as prediabetic in the preoperative setting (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.08; p = 0.002). Patients who developed P-DM were more commonly readmitted within 90 days of surgery and had higher postoperative healthcare expenditures in the year after surgery ($24,440 US dollars vs $16,130 US dollars; both p < 0.001) vs patients without P-DM.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 1 in 5 Medicare beneficiaries who undergo a pancreatic resection develop P-DM after pancreatic resection. Appropriate screening and improved patient education should be conducted for these patients, in particular, for those with identified risk factors.

Prevalence and Risk Factors for Pancreatic Insufficiency After Partial Pancreatectomy

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine the rate, timing, and predictors of diabetes and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency after pancreatectomy in order to inform preoperative patient counseling and risk management strategies.

METHODS

Using prescription claims as a surrogate for disease prevalence, IBM Watson Health MarketScan was queried for claims patterns pre- and post-pancreatectomy. Multivariable models explored associations between clinical characteristics and medication use within 2 years of surgery.

RESULTS

In total, 18.96% of 2,848 pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) patients and 18.95% of 1,858 distal pancreatectomy (DP) patients had preoperative diabetic medication prescription claims. Fewer (6.6% and 3.88%, respectively) had pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) claims. Diabetic medication claims increased to 28.69% after PD and 38.59% after DP [adjusted relative risk (aRR) = 1.36 (95% CI 1.27, 1.46)]. Other associated factors included age > 45, medical comorbidity, and obesity. The incidence of new diabetic medication claims among medication naïve patients was 13.78% for PD and 24.7% for DP (p < 0.001) with a median 4.7 and 4.9 months post-operatively. The prevalence of PERT claims was 55.97% after PD and 17.06% after DP [aRR = 0.32 (0.29, 0.36)]. The incidence of postoperative PERT claims 53.98% (PD) and 14.84% (DP) (p < 0.0001). The median time to new PERT claim was 3.0 (PD) and 3.2 (DP) months, respectively. Claims for both diabetic medications and PERT rose sharply after surgery and plateaued within 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This study defines prevalence, timing, and predictors for post-pancreatectomy insufficiency to inform preoperative counseling, risk modification strategies, and interventions related to quality of life.

Complications After Pancreaticoduodenectomy

The most common complications after a pancreaticoduodenectomy are delayed gastric emptying, pancreatic fistulae, hemorrhage, chyle leaks, endocrine and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, and surgical site infections. Understanding the potential complications and recognizing them are imperative to taking great care of these complex patients. Taking care of these patients postoperatively requires a team approach including experienced nursing staff combined with robust gastroenterology and interventional radiology.

Development of a preoperative prediction model for new-onset diabetes mellitus after partial pancreatectomy: A retrospective cohort study

Pancreatectomy is an invasive surgery that is sometimes associated with complications. New-onset diabetes mellitus sometimes develops after partial pancreatectomy and severely affects the patient's quality of life. This study aimed to develop a preoperative prediction model of new-onset diabetes mellitus after partial pancreatectomy, which will help patients and surgeons to achieve more easily better common decisions on regarding whether to perform partial pancreatectomy. This retrospective cohort study analyzed medical records of patients who underwent partial pancreatectomy (total pancreatectomy excluded) from April 1, 2008, to February 28, 2016, which were available in the database provided by Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). The predictors were preoperative age, body mass index, hemoglobin A1c level, blood glucose level, and indication for partial pancreatectomy. The outcome was the development of new-onset diabetes mellitus at 1 to 12 months after partial pancreatectomy. We used a logistic regression model and calculated the scores of each predictor. To determine test performance, we assessed discrimination ability using the receiver operating characteristic curve and calibration with a calibration plot and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. We also performed internal validation using the bootstrap method. Of 681 patients, 125 (18.4%) had new-onset diabetes mellitus after partial pancreatectomy. The developed prediction model had a possible range of 0 to 46 points. The median score was 13, and the interquartile range was 9 to 22. The C-statistics of the receiver operating characteristic curve on the score to predict the outcome was .70 (95% confidence interval [CI], .65-.75). Regarding the test performance, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test was not significant (P = .17), and calibration was good. In the bootstrapped cohorts, the C-statistics was .69 (95% CI, .62-.76). We developed a preoperative prediction model for new-onset diabetes mellitus after partial pancreatectomy. This would provide important information for surgeons and patients when deciding whether to perform partial pancreatectomy.

The 1-year outcomes after pancreaticogastrostomy using vertical versus horizontal mattress suturing for gastric wrapping

PURPOSE

To investigate the differences in nutritional status 1 year after pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) using vertical suturing (VS) vs. twin square horizontal mattress (HMS) suturing in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

METHODS

The subjects of this study were 134 patients who underwent PD, followed by PG, which was closed by VS in 52 and by HMS in 82. We evaluated the peri- and postoperative factors, nutritional parameters, diameter of the remnant main pancreatic duct, and glucose intolerance 1 year postoperatively.

RESULTS

Forty-five (87%) patients from the VS group and 75 (91%) patients from the HMS group survived for more than 1 year. The incidences of intraabdominal abscess and pancreatic fistula were significantly lower in the HMS group than in the VS group (19.2% vs. 6.6% and19.2% vs. 2.6%, respectively). There were no significant changes in the total protein, serum albumin, and HbA1c levels 1 year postoperatively. The postoperative expansion ratio of the main pancreatic duct diameter was significantly smaller in the HMS group than in the VS group. The strongest risk factor for body weight loss 1 year postoperatively was a non-soft pancreas texture.

CONCLUSION

HMS was superior to VS for preventing early postoperative complications and did not affect pancreatic function.

Hemoglobin A1c as a marker to stratify diabetes risk following pancreaticoduodenectomy

Background

Pancreatic cancer has been shown to cause diabetes mellitus, and diabetes mellitus has been shown to be a risk factor for pancreatic cancer. The effect of pancreaticoduodenectomy on risk for development of diabetes mellitus is unclear. This study used hemoglobin A1c to determine the incidence of diabetes mellitus development following pancreaticoduodenectomy based on preoperative risk of diabetes mellitus.

Methods

Retrospective review of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed with comparison of preoperative diabetes mellitus status and hemoglobin A1c with development of diabetes mellitus postoperatively. Risk ratios were calculated to determine the risk for diabetes mellitus development.

Results

Among 90 patients who met inclusion criteria, 26.7% developed new-onset or worsening diabetes mellitus following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Of those with hemoglobin A1c ≤ 5.6%, only 7.7% of patients developed diabetes mellitus. Patients at risk for diabetes mellitus preoperatively had 4.0 times greater risk for development of diabetes mellitus following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Conclusion

Hemoglobin A1c levels should be used to identify patients at risk for new-onset or worsening diabetes mellitus following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

•

Preoperative hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is a useful marker for predicting development of new-onset or worsening diabetes mellitus (DM) following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

•

Patients with HbA1c ≤ 5.6% are very unlikely to develop DM following PD.

•

Patients at risk for DM (HbA1c 5.7%–6.4%) have a 4-fold greater risk for developing DM following PD than patients with HbA1c ≤ 5.6%.

•

For patients who develop DM following PD, median time to diagnosis is 12 months.

Resection of the duodenum causes long-term endocrine and exocrine dysfunction after Whipple procedure for benign tumors - Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Metabolic dysfunctions after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) need to be considered when pancreatic head resection is likely to lead to long-term survival.

METHODS

Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting measured data of metabolic function after PD and duodenum-sparing total pancreatic head resection (DPPHR). Data from 23 cohort studies comprising 1019 patients were eligible; 594 and 910 patients were involved in systematic review and meta-analysis, respectively.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of postoperative new onset of diabetes mellitus (pNODM) after PD for benign tumors was 46 of 321 patients (14%) measured after follow-up of in mean 36 months postoperatively. New onset of postoperative exocrine insufficiency (PEI) was exhibited by 91 of 209 patients (44%) after PD for benign tumors measured in mean 23 months postoperatively. The meta-analysis indicated pNODM after PD for benign tumor in 32 of 208 patients (15%) and in 10 of 178 patients (6%) after DPPHR (p = 0.007; OR 3.01; (95%CI:1.39-6.49)). PEI was exhibited by 80 of 178 patients (45%) after PD and by 6 of 88 patients (7%) after DPPHR (p < 0.001). GI hormones measured in 194 patients revealed postoperatively a significant impairment of integrated responses of gastrin, motilin, insulin, secretin, PP and GIP (p < 0.050-0.001) after PD. Fasting and stimulated levels of GLP-1 and glucagon levels displayed a significant increase (p < 0.020/p < 0.030). Following DPPHR, responses of gastrin, motilin, secretin and CCK displayed no change compared to preoperative levels.

CONCLUSIONS

After PD, duodenectomy, rather than pancreatic head resection is the main cause for long-term persisting, postoperative new onset of DM and PEI.

Long-Term Endocrine and Exocrine Insufficiency After Pancreatectomy

PURPOSE

To identify peri-operative risk factors and time to onset of pancreatic endocrine/exocrine insufficiency.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a single institutional series of patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) or distal pancreatectomy (DP) between 2000 and 2015. Endocrine/exocrine insufficiencies were defined as need for new pharmacologic intervention. Cox proportional modeling was used to identify peri-operative variables to determine their impact on post-operative pancreatic insufficiency.

RESULTS

A total of 1717 patient records were analyzed (75.47% PD, 24.53% DP) at median follow-up 17.88 months. Average age was 62.62 years, 51.78% were male, and surgery was for malignancy in 74.35% of patients. Post-operative endocrine insufficiency was present in 20.15% (n = 346). Male gender (p = 0.015), increased body mass index (BMI) (p < 0.001), tobacco use (p = 0.011), family history of diabetes (DM) (p < 0.001), personal history of DM (p ≤ 0.001), and DP (p ≤ 0.001) were correlated with increased risk. Mean time to onset was 20.80 ± 33.60 (IQR: 0.49-28.37) months. Post-operative exocrine insufficiency was present in 36.23% (n = 622). Race (p = 0.014), lower BMI (p < 0.001), family history of DM (p = 0.007), steatorrhea (p < 0.001), elevated pre-operative bilirubin (p = 0.019), and PD (p ≤ 0.001) were correlated with increased risk. Mean time to onset was 14.20 ± 26.90 (IQR: 0.89-12.69) months.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large series of pancreatectomy patients, 20.15% and 36.23% of patients developed post-operative endocrine and exocrine insufficiency at a mean time to onset of 20.80 and 14.20 months, respectively. Patients should be educated regarding post-resection insufficiencies and providers should have heightened awareness long-term.

Development of Diabetes after Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Results of a 10-Year Series Using Prospective Endocrine Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Limited literature is available on the development of impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes mellitus after pancreaticoduodenectomy. The primary aim was to define the diabetic phenotype and correlate preoperative glycemic laboratory results to new-onset diabetes after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

In this prospective study, perioperative fasting and postprandial (oral glucose tolerance test) plasma glucose, glycated hemoglobin, insulin, and c-peptide were measured in consecutive patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy by the senior author from 2006 to 2017. American Diabetes Association definitions were used for glycemic classifications. Multivariate risk factor analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Of 774 identified patients, 371 diabetics were excluded and 403 patients were included: 167 and 236 were preoperatively classified as nondiabetic and prediabetic, respectively. The incidence rates of diabetes at 120 months post pancreaticoduodenectomy were 9.0% (nondiabetics), 22.0% (prediabetics), and 16.6% (overall). Patients in whom diabetes developed demonstrated a 3-fold larger difference between oral glucose tolerance test and fasting glucose (Δ), and 2-fold larger Δinsulin and Δc-peptide values. Tiered multivariate analysis identified glycated hemoglobin >5.4% with a relative risk (RR) of 2.944 (p = 0.047) as an independent predictor of impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes mellitus. Analysis of patients stratified by preoperative classification identified fasting glucose >95 mg/dL (nondiabetics, RR 1.925; p = 0.002), and glycated hemoglobin ≥5.4% (prediabetics, RR 3.125; p = 0.040) as independent risk factors for diabetes. Compared with nondiabetics, prediabetics classified by any laboratory results demonstrated an RR of 2.471 (p = 0.001) for diabetes developing postoperatively. There was no association between primary pathology, advancing age, or BMI and increased risk of diabetes development.

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes will develop after pancreaticoduodenectomy in approximately 16.6% of patients. A preoperative glycated hemoglobin >5.4% independently predicts new-onset diabetes. Pre- and postoperative endocrine analysis remains paramount for proper patient risk stratification.

New-onset diabetes after pancreatoduodenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pancreatoduodenectomy may lead to new-onset diabetes mellitus, also known as type 3c diabetes, but the exact risk of this complication is unknown. The aim of this review was to assess the risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus after pancreatoduodenectomy.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase (Ovid), and the Cochrane Library for English articles published from March 1993 until March 2017 (PROSPERO registry number: CRD42016039784). Studies reporting on the risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus after pancreatoduodenectomy were included. For meta-analysis, studies were pooled using the random-effects model. All studies were appraised according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

After screening 1,523 studies, 22 studies involving 1,121 patients were eligible. The mean weighted overall proportion of new-onset diabetes mellitus after pancreatoduodenectomy was 16% (95% confidence interval, 12%-20%). We found no significant difference in risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus when pancreatoduodenectomy was performed for nonmalignant disease after excluding patients with chronic pancreatitis (19% risk; 95% confidence interval, 7%-43%; 6 studies) or for malignant disease (22% risk; 95% confidence interval, 14%-32%; 11 studies), P = .71. Among all patients, 6% (95% confidence interval, 4%-10%) developed insulin-dependent new-onset diabetes mellitus.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review identified a clinically relevant risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus after pancreatoduodenectomy of which patients should be informed preoperatively.

Diabetes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: can we predict it?

BACKGROUND

There is limited literature about the perioperative factors which can predict endocrine insufficiency after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). The primary aim was to correlate percentage pancreatic remnant volume (%RV) after PD in nondiabetic patients with the development of new-onset impaired glucose tolerance/diabetes mellitus (IGT/DM). The secondary aim was to identify the risk factors for new-onset IGT/DM.

METHODS

In this prospective study, all consecutive patients with resectable periampullary carcinoma and without IGT/DM were evaluated with fasting and postprandial plasma glucose, HbA1c, insulin, and C-peptide levels preoperatively and at 3 mo postoperatively. After that, all patients were followed up with fasting and postprandial plasma glucose level assessed at 3-mo intervals for 24 mo or till death, whichever occurred earlier. The %RV was determined from computed tomography measurements preoperatively.

RESULTS

Of the 50 patients, 11 (22%) patients developed IGT/DM after median follow-up of 32 mo. The patients' with/without IGT/DM were similar in demographic/perioperative variables. The %RV was found to be an independent factor associated with new-onset IGT/DM. A %RV of <48.8% was found to be a predictor of new-onset IGT/DM (sensitivity, 89.7%; specificity, 73.6%). Plasma sugar and glycosylated hemoglobin levels were significantly higher postoperatively after PD than the preoperative levels. Insulin and C-peptide levels were significantly lower after PD, irrespective of new-onset IGT/DM.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of IGT/DM after PD was 22%, and %RV < 48.8% was found to be a significant risk factor for new-onset IGT/DM. (CTRI/2013/12/004233).

Benign Tumors of the Pancreas-Radical Surgery Versus Parenchyma-Sparing Local Resection-the Challenge Facing Surgeons

Pancreaticoduodenectomy and left-sided pancreatectomy are the surgical treatment standards for tumors of the pancreas. Surgeons, who are requested to treat patients with benign tumors, using standard oncological resections, face the challenge of sacrificing pancreatic and extra-pancreatic tissue. Tumor enucleation, pancreatic middle segment resection and local, duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resections are surgical procedures increasingly used as alternative treatment modalities compared to classical pancreatic resections. Use of local resection procedures for cystic neoplasms and neuro-endocrine tumors of the pancreas (panNETs) is associated with an improvement of procedure-related morbidity, when compared to classical Whipple OP (PD) and left-sided pancreatectomy (LP). The procedure-related advantages are a 90-day mortality below 1% and a low level of POPF B+C rates. Most importantly, the long-term benefits of the use of local surgical procedures are the preservation of the endocrine and exocrine pancreatic functions. PD performed for benign tumors on preoperative normo-glycemic patients is followed by the postoperative development of new onset of diabetes mellitus (NODM) in 4 to 24% of patients, measured by fasting blood glucose and/or oral/intravenous glucose tolerance test, according to the criteria of the international consensus guidelines. Persistence of new diabetes mellitus during the long-term follow-up after PD for benign tumors is observed in 14.5% of cases and after surgery for malignant tumors in 15.5%. Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency after PD is found in the long-term follow-up for benign tumors in 25% and for malignant tumors in 49%. Following LP, 14-31% of patients experience postoperatively NODM; many of the patients subsequently change to insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). The decision-making for cystic neoplasms and panNETs of the pancreas should be guided by the low surgical risk and the preservation of pancreatic metabolic functions when undergoing a limited, local, tissue-sparing procedure.

Risk factors of exocrine and endocrine pancreatic insufficiency after pancreatic resection: A multi-center prospective study

Management of functional consequences after pancreatic resection has become a new therapeutic challenge. The goal of our study is to evaluate the risk factors for exocrine (ExoPI) and endocrine (EndoPI) pancreatic insufficiency after pancreatic surgery and to establish a predictive model for their onset.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 1, 2014 and June 19, 2015, 91 consecutive patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) or left pancreatectomy (LP) (72% and 28%, respectively) were followed prospectively. ExoPI was defined as fecal elastase content<200μg per gram of feces while EndoPI was defined as fasting glucose>126mg/dL or aggravation of preexisting diabetes. The volume of residual pancreas was measured according to the same principles as liver volumetry.

RESULTS

The ExoPI and EndoPI rates at 6 months were 75.9% and 30.8%, respectively. The rate of ExoPI after PD was statistically significantly higher than after LP (98% vs. 21%; P<0.001), while the rate of EndoPI was lower after PD vs. LP, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (28% vs. 38.5%; P=0.412). There was no statistically significant difference in ExoPI found between pancreatico-gastrostomy (PG) and pancreatico-jejunostomy (PJ) (100% vs. 98%; P=1.000). Remnant pancreatic volume less than 39.5% was predictive of ExoPI.

CONCLUSION

ExoPI occurs quasi-systematically after PD irrespective of the reconstruction scheme. The rate of EndoPI did not differ between PD and LP.

Development of Postoperative Diabetes Mellitus in Patients Undergoing Distal Pancreatectomy versus Whipple Procedure

Because the islets of Langerhans are more prevalent in the body and tail of the pancreas, distal pancreatectomy (DP) is believed to increase the likelihood of developing new onset diabetes mellitus (NODM). To determine whether the development of postoperative diabetes was more prevalent in patients undergoing DP or Whipple procedure, 472 patients undergoing either a DP (n = 122) or Whipple (n = 350), regardless of underlying pathology, were analyzed at one month postoperatively. Insulin or oral hypoglycemic requirements were assessed and patients were stratified into preoperative diabetic status: NODM or preexisting diabetes. A retrospective chart review of the 472 patients between 1996 and 2014 showed that the total rate of NODM after Whipple procedure was 43 per cent, which was not different from patients undergoing DP (45%). The incidence of preoperative diabetes was 12 per cent in patients undergoing the Whipple procedure and 17 per cent in the DP cohort. Thus, the overall incidence of diabetes after Whipple procedure was 54 and 49 per cent in the DP group. The development of diabetes was unrelated to the type of resection performed. Age more than 65 and Caucasian ethnicity were associated with postoperative diabetes regardless of the type of resection performed.

Nutritional and Metabolic Derangements in Pancreatic Cancer and Pancreatic Resection

Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. The disease and its treatment can cause significant nutritional impairments that often adversely impact patient quality of life (QOL). The pancreas has both exocrine and endocrine functions and, in the setting of cancer, both systems may be affected. Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) manifests as weight loss and steatorrhea, while endocrine insufficiency may result in diabetes mellitus. Surgical resection, a central component of pancreatic cancer treatment, may induce or exacerbate these dysfunctions. Nutritional and metabolic dysfunctions in patients with pancreatic cancer lack characterization, and few guidelines exist for nutritional support in patients after surgical resection. We reviewed publications from the past two decades (1995–2016) addressing the nutritional and metabolic status of patients with pancreatic cancer, grouping them into status at the time of diagnosis, status at the time of resection, and status of nutritional support throughout the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer. Here, we summarize the results of these investigations and evaluate the effectiveness of various types of nutritional support in patients after pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We outline the following conservative perioperative strategies to optimize patient outcomes and guide the care of these patients: (1) patients with albumin < 2.5 mg/dL or weight loss > 10% should postpone surgery and begin aggressive nutrition supplementation; (2) patients with albumin < 3 mg/dL or weight loss between 5% and 10% should have nutrition supplementation prior to surgery; (3) enteral nutrition (EN) should be preferred as a nutritional intervention over total parenteral nutrition (TPN) postoperatively; and, (4) a multidisciplinary approach should be used to allow for early detection of symptoms of endocrine and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency alongside implementation of appropriate treatment to improve the patient’s quality of life.

Does the pancreatic volume reduction rate using serial computed tomographic volumetry predict new onset diabetes after pancreaticoduodenectomy?

Volume reduction of the pancreatic tissues following a pancreatectomy can lead to the deterioration of glucose homeostasis. This is defined as pancreatogenic diabetes mellitus (DM). The objective of this study was to investigate the occurrence of new-onset DM (NODM) and evaluate the risk factors, including the pancreas volume reduction rate in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).Sixty-six patients without preoperative DM underwent PD for periampullary tumors between August 2007 and December 2012 and were included in this analysis. These patients underwent follow-up tests and abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan 7 days, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months after the operation. The pancreas volume reduction rate was calculated by CT volumetry. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the postoperative development of DM.After PD, newly diagnosed DM occurred in 16 patients (24.2%). The incidence of DM was highest among patients with carcinomas with an advanced T stage. The pancreatic volume reduction rate after 6 and 12 months in the NODM group was significantly higher than the normal glucose group in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, the pancreatic volume reduction rate 6 months after PD was the only significant predictive factor for the development of NODM (P = 0.002).This study suggests that the pancreatic volume reduction rate 6 months after PD was the only significant predictive factor for the development of NODM. CT volumetry of the pancreas may be useful as a predictor of NODM after PD.

Diabetes associated with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is just diabetes: Results of a prospective observational study in surgical patients

BACKGROUND

Identification of a specific diabetes signature associated to pancreatic ductal carcinoma (PDAC) could be a key to detect asymptomatic, early stage tumors. We aim to characterize the clinical signature and the pathogenetic factors of the different types of diabetes associated with PDAC, based on the time between diabetes and cancer diagnosis.

METHODS

Prospective observational study on 364 PDAC patients admitted to a referral center for pancreatic disease. Hospital and/or outpatient medical records were reviewed. Blood biochemical values including fasting blood glucose, insulin and/or C-peptide, glycosylated hemoglobin and anti-islet antibodies were determined. Diabetes onset was assessed after surgery and during follow-up.

RESULTS

The prevalence of diabetes in patients was 67%. Considering 174 patients (47.8%) already having diabetes when diagnosed with PDAC (long duration, short duration, concomitant), the clinical and biochemical profile was similar to that of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Diabetes was associated with known risk factors (i.e., age, sex, family history for diabetes and increased BMI) and both beta-cell dysfunction and insulin resistance were present. Considering 70 patients (19.2%) with onset of diabetes after PDAC diagnosis (early and late onset), the strongest predictor was the loss of beta-cell mass following pancreatectomy in patients with risk factors for T2D.

CONCLUSION

Different types of diabetes according to the time between diabetes and PDAC diagnosis are clinical entities widely overlapping with T2D. Therefore, the success of a strategy considering diabetes onset as a marker of asymptomatic PDAC will largely depend on our ability to identify new diabetes-unrelated biomarkers of PDAC.

Thirty-day outcomes underestimate endocrine and exocrine insufficiency after pancreatic resection

BACKGROUND

Long-term incidence of endocrine and exocrine insufficiency after pancreatectomy is poorly described. We analyze the long-term risks of pancreatic insufficiency after pancreatectomy.

METHODS

Subjects who underwent pancreatectomy from 2002 to 2012 were identified from a prospective database (n = 227). Subjects who underwent total pancreatectomy or pancreatitis surgery were excluded. New post-operative endocrine and exocrine insufficiency was defined as the need for new pharmacologic intervention within 1000 days from resection.

RESULTS

28 (16%) of 178 subjects without pre-existing endocrine insufficiency developed post-operative endocrine insufficiency: 7 (25%) did so within 30 days, 8 (29%) between 30 and 90 days, and 13 (46%) after 90 days. 94 (43%) of 214 subjects without pre-operative exocrine insufficiency developed exocrine insufficiency: 20 (21%) did so within 30 days, 29 (31%) between 30 and 90 days, and 45 (48%) after 90 days. Adjuvant radiation was associated with new endocrine insufficiency. On multivariate regression, pancreaticoduodenectomy and chemotherapy were associated with a greater risk of exocrine insufficiency.

CONCLUSION

Reporting 30-day functional outcomes for pancreatic resection is insufficient, as nearly 45% of subjects who develop disease do so after 90 days. Reporting of at least 90-day outcomes may more reliably assess risk for post-operative endocrine and exocrine insufficiency.

Main- and Branch-Duct Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Extent of Surgical Resection

Background

Surgical treatment of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) requires a differentiated approach regarding indications and extent of resection.

Methods

The review summarizes the current literature on indication, timing, and surgical procedures in IPMN.

Results

The most important differentiation has to be made between main-duct and branch-duct IPMN as well as mixed-type lesions that biologically mimic main-duct types. In main-duct and mixed-type IPMN, the resection should be indicated by the time of the diagnosis – in accordance with the international consensus guidelines – and should follow oncological principles. Depending on IPMN localization, this implies partial pancreatoduodenectomy, distal pancreatectomy, or total pancreatectomy and includes the corresponding types of lymphadenectomy. Furthermore, branch-duct IPMN > 3 cm or bearing high-risk features (mural nodules in magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, or endoscopic ultrasound imaging; symptomatic lesions; elevated tumor markers) are similarly treated. As the risk for malignancy in smaller branch-duct IPMN is lower, the decision for surgical treatment is often individually made – despite the updated 2012 guidelines. In these lesions, limited surgical approaches, including enucleation and central pancreatectomy, are possible.

Conclusion

Timely and radical resection of IPMN offers the unique opportunity to prevent pancreatic cancer, and even in malignant IPMN surgery can offer a curative approach with excellent long-term outcome in early stages. A structured imaging follow-up should be considered to recognize IPMN recurrence and metachronous pancreatic cancer as well as gastrointestinal neoplasias by endoscopic surveillance.

Incidence and severity of pancreatogenic diabetes after pancreatic resection

BACKGROUND

While many patients experience prolonged survival after pancreatic resection for benign or malignant disease, the long-term risk of pancreatogenic diabetes mellitus (DM) remains poorly characterized.

METHODS

One thousand one hundred seven patients underwent pancreatectomy at Thomas Jefferson University between 2006 and 2013. Attempts were made to contact all living patients by telephone and a DM-focused questionnaire was administered.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-nine of 691 (37 %) surviving patients completed the survey, including 179 pancreaticoduodenectomies (PD), 78 distal pancreatectomies (DP), and 2 total pancreatectomies. In the PD group, 44 (25 %) patients reported having DM prior to resection. Of these, 5 (12 %) had improved glucose control after resection and 21 (48 %) reported escalated DM medication requirements post-resection. Of 135 PD patients without preoperative DM, 24 (18 %) had new-onset DM postoperatively. In the DP group, 23 patients (29 %) had DM preoperatively. None had improved glucose control after resection, while six (26 %) had worse control after resection. Seventeen of 55 DP patients (31 %) without preoperative DM developed new-onset DM postoperatively (p = 0.04 vs. PD). Preoperative HgbA1C >6.0 %, glucose >124 mg/dL, and insulin use >2 units per day were associated with an increased risk of new-onset postoperative DM.

CONCLUSIONS

The development or worsening of DM after pancreatic resection is extremely common, with different types of resections conveying different risks for disease progression. DP places patients at a greater risk for the development of new-onset postoperative diabetes when compared to PD. In contrast, patients with preoperative diabetes are more likely to experience worsening of their disease after PD as compared to DP. Patients should be screened prospectively, particularly those at highest risk, and informed of and educated about the potential for post-resection DM.

Postoperative chemoradiotherapy following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Impact of dose-volumetric parameters on the development of diabetes mellitus

PURPOSE

The purpose of this research was to analyze the relationship between dose-volumetric parameters and the development of diabetes mellitus (DM) in patients treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) following curative resection for upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Medical records of patients who underwent postoperative CRT following curative resection, either pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) or pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) for upper GI cancers including pancreas, biliary, ampullary, and duodenal cancers, between January 2006 and December 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 42 patients who were regularly followed for at least 2 years were included for analysis. Dose-volumetric parameters such as remnant pancreatic volume, mean dose, maximum dose (Dmax), and percentage of volume receiving specific dose or more were obtained from pre- and postoperative CT scan images and treatment plan.

RESULTS

Dmax and V50 (percentage of volume receiving at least 50 Gy) were statistically significant factors for the development of DM (p = 0.013, p = 0.031, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity of Dmax was 0.875 and 0.559, with cut-off value of 51.1 Gy, respectively. V50 had sensitivity of 0.875 and specificity of 0.618 for cut-off value of 16 %. No patient-related factor other than pretreatment cerebrovascular events was associated with the development of DM. On multivariate analysis, V50 was the only factor with statistical significance (p = 0.028), whereas Dmax showed borderline significance (p = 0.079).

CONCLUSION

V50 was the only independent factor associated with the development of diabetes and may function as guideline to predict the development of DM in patients receiving CRT following curative resection.