Spinal Cord Stimulation and the Induction of c-fos and Heat Shock Protein 72 in the Central Nervous System of Rats

The role of endogenous opioid neuropeptides in neurostimulation-driven analgesia

Due to the prevalence of chronic pain worldwide, there is an urgent need to improve pain management strategies. While opioid drugs have long been used to treat chronic pain, their use is severely limited by adverse effects and abuse liability. Neurostimulation techniques have emerged as a promising option for chronic pain that is refractory to other treatments. While different neurostimulation strategies have been applied to many neural structures implicated in pain processing, there is variability in efficacy between patients, underscoring the need to optimize neurostimulation techniques for use in pain management. This optimization requires a deeper understanding of the mechanisms underlying neurostimulation-induced pain relief. Here, we discuss the most commonly used neurostimulation techniques for treating chronic pain. We present evidence that neurostimulation-induced analgesia is in part driven by the release of endogenous opioids and that this endogenous opioid release is a common endpoint between different methods of neurostimulation. Finally, we introduce technological and clinical innovations that are being explored to optimize neurostimulation techniques for the treatment of pain, including multidisciplinary efforts between neuroscience research and clinical treatment that may refine the efficacy of neurostimulation based on its underlying mechanisms.

Spinal Cord Stimulation and Treatment of Peripheral or Central Neuropathic Pain: Mechanisms and Clinical Application

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) as an evidence-based interventional treatment has been used and approved for clinical use in a variety of pathological states including peripheral neuropathic pain; however, until now, it has not been used for the treatment of spinal cord injury- (SCI-) induced central neuropathic pain. This paper reviews the underlying mechanisms of SCS-induced analgesia and its clinical application in the management of peripheral and central neuropathic pain. Evidence from recent research publications indicates that nociceptive processing at peripheral and central sensory systems is thought to be modulated by SCS through (i) inhibition of the ascending nociceptive transmission by the release of analgesic neurotransmitters such as GABA and endocannabinoids at the spinal dorsal horn; (ii) facilitation of the descending inhibition by release of noradrenalin, dopamine, and serotonin acting on their receptors in the spinal cord; and (iii) activation of a variety of supraspinal brain areas related to pain perception and emotion. These insights into the mechanisms have resulted in the clinically approved use of SCS in peripheral neuropathic pain states like Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) and Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS). However, the mechanisms underlying SCS-induced pain relief in central neuropathic pain are only partly understood, and more research is needed before this therapy can be implemented in SCI patients with central neuropathic pain.

Exploration of the Supraspinal Hypotheses about Spinal Cord Stimulation and Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation: A Systematic Review

Despite the established efficacy and effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS), there is still no consensus on the supraspinal mechanisms of action of this therapy. The purpose of this study was to systematically review previously raised hypotheses concerning supraspinal mechanisms of action of SCS based on human, animal and computational studies. Searches were conducted using four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS and Web of Science), backward reference searching and consultation with experts. The study protocol was registered prior to initiation of the review process (PROSPERO CRD42020161531). A total of 54 publications were included, 21 of which were animal studies, and 33 were human studies. The supraspinal hypotheses (n = 69) identified from the included studies could be categorized into six groups concerning the proposed supraspinal hypothesis, namely descending pathways (n = 24); ascending medial pathway (n = 13); ascending lateral pathway (n = 10); affective/motivational influences (n = 8); spinal–cerebral (thalamic)-loop (n = 3) and miscellaneous (n = 11). Scientific support is provided for the hypotheses identified. Modulation of the descending nociceptive inhibitory pathways, medial and lateral pathways were the most frequently reported hypotheses about the supraspinal mechanisms of action of SCS. These hypotheses were mainly supported by studies with a high or moderate confidence in the body of evidence.

Supraspinal Mechanisms of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Modulation of Pain: Five Decades of Research and Prospects for the Future

The field of spinal cord stimulation is expanding rapidly, with new waveform paradigms asserting supraspinal sites of action. The scope of treatment applications is also broadening from chronic pain to include cerebral ischemia, dystonia, tremor, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson disease, neuropsychiatric disorders, memory, addiction, cognitive function, and other neurologic diseases. The role of neurostimulation as an alternative strategy to opioids for chronic pain treatment is under robust discussion in both scientific and public forums. An understanding of the supraspinal mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of spinal cord stimulation will aid in the appropriate application and development of optimal stimulation strategies for modulating pain signaling pathways. In this review, the authors focus on clinical and preclinical studies that indicate the role of supraspinal mechanisms in spinal cord stimulation-induced pain inhibition, and explore directions for future investigations.

Electrical stimulation of the dorsal columns of the spinal cord for Parkinson's disease

Spinal cord stimulation has been used for the treatment of chronic pain for decades. In 2009, our laboratory proposed, based on studies in rodents, that electrical stimulation of the dorsal columns of the spinal cord could become an effective treatment for motor symptoms associated with Parkinson's disease (PD). Since our initial report in rodents and a more recent study in primates, several clinical studies have now described beneficial effects of dorsal column stimulation in parkinsonian patients. In primates, we have shown that dorsal column stimulation activates multiple structures along the somatosensory pathway and desynchronizes the pathological cortico-striatal oscillations responsible for the manifestation of PD symptoms. Based on recent evidence, we argue that neurological disorders such as PD can be broadly classified as diseases emerging from abnormal neuronal timing, leading to pathological brain states, and that the spinal cord could be used as a "channel" to transmit therapeutic electrical signals to disrupt these abnormalities. © 2017 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Chronic spinal cord electrical stimulation protects against 6-hydroxydopamine lesions

Although L-dopa continues to be the gold standard for treating motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD), it presents long-term complications. Deep brain stimulation is effective, but only a small percentage of idiopathic PD patients are eligible. Based on results in animal models and a handful of patients, dorsal column stimulation (DCS) has been proposed as a potential therapy for PD. To date, the long-term effects of DCS in animal models have not been quantified. Here, we report that DCS applied twice a week in rats treated with bilateral 6-OHDA striatal infusions led to a significant improvement in symptoms. DCS-treated rats exhibited a higher density of dopaminergic innervation in the striatum and higher neuronal cell count in the substantia nigra pars compacta compared to a control group. These results suggest that DCS has a chronic therapeutical and neuroprotective effect, increasing its potential as a new clinical option for treating PD patients.

Relative contributions of the thalamus and the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus to the cardiac sympathetic afferent reflex

The cardiac sympathetic afferent reflex (CSAR) is induced by stimulating the cardiac sympathetic afferents, which evokes increases in sympathetic outflow and arterial pressure. In the present study, we attempted to identify the contribution of thalamic and hypothalamic nuclei involved in the CSAR. First, we observed that there was an increase in the number of c-Fos-labeled cells in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) (190 ± 18 vs. 101 ± 15; P < 0.05), the paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus (PVT) (239 ± 23 vs. 151 ± 15; P < 0.05), and the mediodorsal thalamic nucleus (MD) (92 ± 9 vs. 63 ± 6; P < 0.05) following epicardial application of bradykinin (BK) compared with the control group (P < 0.05). Second, using extracellular single-unit recording, we found 25% of spontaneously active neurons in the thalamus were stimulated by epicardial application of BK or capsaicin in intact rats. However, 24% of spontaneously active neurons in the thalamus were still stimulated by epicardial application of BK or capsaicin despite vagotomy and sinoaortic denervation. None of the neurons in the thalamus responded to baroreflex changes in arterial pressure, induced by intravenous injection of phenylephrine or sodium nitroprusside. The CSAR was inhibited by microinjection of muscimol or lidocaine into the PVN. However, it was not inhibited or blocked by microinjection of muscimol or lidocaine into the thalamus. Taken together, these data suggest that the thalamus, while activated, is not critical for autonomic adjustments in response to activation of the CSAR. On the other hand, the PVN is critically involved in the central pathway of the CSAR.

From heart to brain: the genesis and processing of cardiac pain

Angina pectoris is important because of its association with heart disease and risk of death. Historically after Heberden's account of angina in 1772, the association of pain with coronary artery disease quickly followed. Within a few years, Burns suggested an etiological role for ischemia. Subsequently, theories of differential myocardial stretch dominated thinking until Lewis' chemical hypothesis in 1932, in which the local release of chemical substances during ischemia was seen as the cause of pain. This review considers how ischemia at the tissue level triggers activation of afferent nociceptive pain fibres. The afferent projections of sympathetic and vagal afferent fibres are described, with a number of methodologies cited (eg, injection of pseudorabies virus into the heart with mapping of the retrograde viral transport pathways; and elevation of neuronal c-fos synthesis in brain regions activated by capsaicin application to the heart). Our own functional neuroimaging studies of angina are also reviewed. There are 2 intriguing features of angina. The first is the poor correlation between symptoms and extent of coronary disease. The spectrum ranges from entirely silent myocardial ischemia to that of a functional pain syndrome--the 'sensitive heart'--of cardiac syndrome X. An even more difficult aspect is the wide variability in symptoms experienced by an individual patient. A new paradigm is presented which, besides considering myocardial oxygen supply/demand imbalance, also draws insights from the broader field of pain research. Neuromodulation applies at multiple levels of the neuraxis--peripheral nerves, spinal cord, and brain--and it invites exploitation, whether pharmacological or electrical, for the benefit of the cardiac patient in pain.

Modulation of cardiac ischemia-sensitive afferent neuron signaling by preemptive C2 spinal cord stimulation: effect on substance P release from rat spinal cord

The upper cervical spinal region functions as an intraspinal controller of thoracic spinal reflexes and contributes to neuronal regulation of the ischemic myocardium. Our objective was to determine whether stimulation of the C2 cervical spinal cord (SCS) of rats modified the input signal at the thoracic spinal cord when cardiac ischemia-sensitive (sympathetic) afferents were activated by transient occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery (CoAO). Changes in c-Fos expression were used as an index of neuronal activation within the spinal cord and brain stem. The pattern of substance P (SP) release, a putative nociceptive transmitter, was measured using antibody-coated microprobes. Two SCS protocols were used: reactive SCS, applied concurrently with intermittent CoAO and preemptive, sustained SCS starting 15 min before and continuing during the repeated intermittent CoAO. CoAO increased SP release from laminae I and II in the T4 spinal cord above resting levels. Intermittent SCS with CoAO resulted in greater levels of SP release from deeper laminae IV-VII in T4 than CoAO alone. In contrast, SP release from laminae I and II was inhibited when CoAO was applied during preemptive, sustained SCS. Preemptive SCS likewise reduced c-Fos expression in the T4 spinal cord (laminae I-V) and nucleus tractus solitarius but increased expression in the intermediolateral cell column of T4 compared with CoAO alone. These results suggest that preemptive SCS from the high cervical region modulates sensory afferent signaling from the ischemic myocardium.

Cardiac nociception in rats: neuronal pathways and the influence of dermal neurostimulation on conveyance to the central nervous system

Neurostimulation for refractory angina pectoris is often advocated for its clinical efficacy. However, the recruited pathways to induce electroanalgesia are partially unknown. Therefore, we sought to study the effect of neurostimulation on experimentally induced cardiac nociception, using capsaicin as nociception-induced substance. Four different groups of male Wistar rats were pericardially infused with either saline or capsaicin with or without neurostimulation. Group StimCap was infused with capsaicin, and group StimVeh was infused with saline. Both groups were treated with neurostimulation. Group ShamCap was only infused with capsaicin without stimulation, whereas group ShamVeh was only infused with saline. Neuronal activation differences were assessed with cytochemical staining, revealing the cellular expression of c-fos. Pain behavior was registered on video and was quantitatively analyzed. In the StimCap and ShamCap groups, all animals exerted typical pain behavior, whereas in the StimVeh group only moderate changes in behavior were observed. Group ShamVeh animals were unaffected by the procedure. The upper thoracic spinal cord showed high numbers of c-fos-positive cells, predominantly in laminae III and IV in both StimCap and StimVeh groups. Almost no c-fos expression was noticed in groups ShamCap and ShamVeh in these sections of the spinal cord. In groups StimCap and ShamCap a significantly higher number of c-fos-positive cells in comparison with groups StimVeh and ShamVeh were noticed in the periambigus region, the nucleus tractus solitarius, and the paraventricular hypothalamus. In the paraventricular thalamus, periaqueductal gray, and central amygdala, no significant differences were noticed among the first three groups, and the c-fos concentration in these three groups was significantly higher than in group ShamVeh. It is concluded that neurostimulation does not influence capsaicin-induced cardiac nociceptive pain pulses to the central nervous system. Furthermore, capsaicin-induced cardiac pain and neurostimulation may utilize two different pathways.