Carvedilol: A Novel Cardiovascular Drug with Multiple Actions

Access to tetrahydrocarbazoles and pyrrolo[3,4-b]carbazoles through sequential reactions of triazoles and indoles

Tetrahydrocarbazoles and pyrrolo[3,4-b]carbazoles could be synthesized conveniently through sequential reactions of ester-tethered 1-sulfonyl-1,2,3-triazoles and indoles. The reaction conditions were mild and the procedures were quite simple. Moreover, the key intermediate α,β-unsaturated imine acted as a [2C] synthon in the [4 + 2] cycloaddition reaction, and the imino group could be used as a nucleophile to construct the fourth ring.

Cytoprotective Potential of Aged Garlic Extract (AGE) and Its Active Constituent, S-allyl-l-cysteine, in Presence of Carvedilol during Isoproterenol-Induced Myocardial Disturbance and Metabolic Derangements in Rats

This study was conducted to determine the potential interaction of aged garlic extract (AGE) with carvedilol (CAR), as well as to investigate the role of S-allyl-l-cysteine (SAC), an active constituent of AGE, in rats with isoproterenol (ISO)-induced myocardial dysfunction. At the end of three weeks of treatment with AGE (2 and 5 mL/kg) or SAC (13.1 and 32.76 mg/kg), either alone or along with CAR (10 mg/kg) in the respective groups of animals, ISO was administered subcutaneously to induce myocardial damage. Myocardial infarction (MI) diagnostic predictor enzymes, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and creatinine kinase (CK-MB), were measured in both serum and heart tissue homogenates (HTH). Superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, and thiobarbituric acid reactive species (TBARS) were estimated in HTH. When compared with other groups, the combined therapy of high doses of AGE and SAC given alone or together with CAR caused a significant decrease in serum LDH and CK-MB activities. Further, significant rise in the LDH and CK-MB activities in HTH was noticed in the combined groups of AGE and SAC with CAR. It was also observed that both doses of AGE and SAC significantly increased endogenous antioxidants in HTH. Furthermore, histopathological observations corroborated the biochemical findings. The cytoprotective potential of SAC and AGE were dose-dependent, and SAC was more potent than AGE. The protection offered by aged garlic may be attributed to SAC. Overall, the results indicated that a high dose of AGE and its constituent SAC, when combined with carvedilol, has a synergistic effect in preventing morphological and physiological changes in the myocardium during ISO-induced myocardial damage.

Effect of chronic treatment of carvedilol on oxidative stress in an intracerebroventricular streptozotocin induced model of dementia in rats

Objectives

Oxidative stress is emerging as an important issue in the pathogenesis of dementia. This study was conducted to investigate the possible neuroprotective effects of carvedilol against streptozotocin induced behavioural alterations and oxidative damage in rats.

Methods

An intracerbroventricular cannula was implanted in the lateral ventricles of male Wistar rats. Various behavioural (locomotor activity, Morris water maze task) and biochemical parameters (lipid peroxidation, nitrate concentration, catalase, acetylcholinesterase, reduced glutathione and protein) were assessed.

Key findings

Intracerebroventricular administration of streptozotocin caused a significant memory deficit as evaluated in the Morris water maze task paradigms, and caused marked oxidative damage as indicated by significant increases in malondialdehyde and nitrite levels, and depletion of superoxide dismutase, catalase and reduced glutathione levels. It also caused a significant increase in acetylcholinesterase activity. Chronic administration of carvedilol (1 and 2 mg/kg, i.p.) for a period of 25 days starting 4 days before streptozotocin administration resulted in an improvement in memory retention, and attenuation of oxidative damage and acetylcholinesterase activity.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates the effectiveness of carvedilol in preventing cognitive deficits as well as the oxidative stress caused by intracerbroventicular administration of streptozotocin in rats. Carvedilol may have potential in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases.

Chronic treatment with losartan and carvedilol differentially modulates renal vascular responses to sympathomimetics compared to treatment with individual agents in normal Wistar Kyoto and spontaneously hypertensive rats

This study set out to investigate the impact of chronic cumulative blockade of angiotensin II and adrenoceptors in WKY and SHR and to explore how the renovascular responses to adrenergic and angiotensin II receptor agonists may be interdependent. Rats were treated with either losartan, carvedilol or losartan+carvedilol for 7 days and on day eight, animals were pentobarbitone anaesthetized and prepared for renal haemodynamic study. Dose-response relationships were determined in terms of reduction/elevation in the magnitude of renal blood flow in response to intrarenal arterial injection of dopamine, phenylephrine and isoprenaline. Renal vascular responses were blunted in WKY and SHR treated with either losartan or carvedilol as compared to their untreated counterparts (P<0.05). In the combined treated rats, the vascular responses to isoprenaline and phenylephrine were restored to levels observed in the untreated rats, but the renal vasoconstrictor responses to dopamine decreased (P<0.05) in both WKY and SHR. There was a reduction of (P<0.05) in the magnitude of the isoprenaline induced renal vasodilation in all SHR as compared to WKY groups. The data obtained showed that the renal vascular action of dopamine, phenylephrine and isoprenaline depended on an intact renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in WKY and SHR. Treatment with losartan or carvedilol blunted the renal vasoconstrictor/vasodilator responses to sympathomimetics which was attenuated with the combined treatment. These observations using chronic blockade of adrenergic and angiotensin receptors demonstrated that there was a long standing interdependency between the RAS and sympathetic nervous system (SNS) in determining the responsiveness of the renal vasculature of normal and hypertensive rats.

Efficacy of carvedilol for ischemia/reperfusion-induced oxidative renal injury in rats

In renal transplantation, ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury is related to production of reactive oxygen species. In addition to its antihypertensive action due to nonselective beta-adrenergic blocking activity, carvedilol has potent antioxidant activity. This study was designed to investigate the effects of carvedilol on I/R injury in rats. On postoperative days 2 and 4, serum creatinine levels were higher among the control and the metoprolol treatment groups compared with the carvedilol treatment group (P < .005). However, there were no significant differences on postoperative day 7. In conclusion, increased antioxidant modulation by carvedilol attenuated renal I/R injury.

Carvedilol versus cardioselective beta-blockers for the treatment of hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Treatment with beta-blockers is recommended to achieve and maintain adequate blood pressure control in patients with hypertension, and these agents have been shown to decrease cardiovascular risk factors in patients with both hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, beta-blocker therapy also may worsen glycemic and lipidemic control and may lead to microalbuminuria. A recent study showed a better metabolic profile with carvedilol than with metoprolol in patients with both type 2 diabetes and hypertension in the presence of renin-angiotensin system blockade. This beneficial effect on metabolic components has been proposed as attributable to carvedilol's alpha-blocking effects or antioxidant properties. In this article, the pathophysiology of hypertension and type 2 diabetes and the association between them are reviewed, the pharmacologic properties of carvedilol are discussed, and clinical studies in the literature comparing carvedilol with selective beta-blockers in patients with both type 2 diabetes and hypertension are identified and evaluated. This information should be useful to practitioners when selecting the optimum beta-blocker for treating hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes.

beta-Blockers in hypertension: is carvedilol different?

Most studies assessing the effects of beta-blockers were carried out with traditional, beta(1)-selective beta-blockers, such as metoprolol and atenolol. Pathophysiologic and pharmacologic studies have documented that not all beta-blockers are created equal. In particular, the pharmacologic and clinical profiles of the newer, vasodilating beta-blockers, such as carvedilol, have been shown to differ from those of the traditional beta-blockers. These differences, although relevant in the younger patient with hypertension, are particularly important in elderly patients in whom traditional beta-blockers may not be as effective or as well tolerated as the newer vasodilating agents.

Comparison between a sustained administration of carvedilol versus atenolol to reduce restenosis after coronary stenting

BACKGROUND

Carvedilol is a direct inhibitor of vascular smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation through inhibition of mitogen-activated protein kinase activity and regulation of cell cycle progression. It produced an 84% suppression of neointimal hyperplasia in rat carotid angioplasty model, but no data are available regarding its effect on stent restenosis in patients. We tested whether a sustained oral administration of carvedilol reduces restenosis after coronary stenting in patients.

METHODS

One hundred fifty-nine patients were randomly assigned to receive either carvedilol (50 mg/d, n = 80) or atenolol (50 mg/d, n = 79) at least 1 day before stenting and continued on the same medication over a period of 3 months. The primary end point was angiographic restenosis (>50% diameter stenosis) at follow-up angiography.

RESULTS

Baseline clinical and angiographic variables were similar between the carvedilol and atenolol group. The carvedilol dose was tolerable in most patients but reduced in 3 patients because of hypotension or dizziness. Angiographic follow-up was done in 137 patients (86%), and restenosis rate was not different significantly between both groups (17.1% versus 19.4%, P =.732).

CONCLUSIONS

A sustained oral administration of carvedilol is not effective to reduce restenosis after stenting in patients. With carvedilol targeting regulators of cell cycle progression and having a profound neointimal inhibition with a high blood concentration in an animal study, further investigations with a stent-based delivery to achieve a high local concentration may be warranted.

Preparation and study the 1:2 inclusion complex of carvedilol with β-cyclodextrin

An inclusion complex of beta-cyclodextrin with carvedilol was prepared by using a convenient new method of microwave irradiation. Phase-solubility studies demonstrated the ability of beta-cyclodextrins to complex with carvedilol and increase drug solubility. The structure of inclusion complex was determined by fluorescence spectroscopy and 1H NMR, 13C NMR measurements in solution. The solid inclusion was characterised by infrared spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and element analysis. These experimental results confirmed the existence of 1:2 inclusion complex of carvedilol with beta-cyclodextrin, the formation constant of complex was determined by the fluorescence method. Molecular modeling predicted the energy-minimized structure of the complex.

Measurement of carvedilol in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection

Carvedilol is a beta/alpha1-adrenoceptor blocker. A sensitive method for measuring plasma levels of carvedilol in human administrated low doses is needed since its plasma concentration is low. We measured carvedilol and carvedilol M21-aglycon using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with electrochemical detection. The amperometric detector was operated at 930 mV versus Ag/AgCl. Mean coefficients of variation (n = 5) for carvedilol and M21-aglycon were 4.0 and 7.7% (intra) and 6.1 and 6.7% (inter), respectively. The lower limit of quantification for each analyte was 0.10 ng/ml (signal-to-noise ratio = 3). This lower limit of quantification for carvedilol was sufficient for clinical use.

Carvedilol inhibits platelet-derived growth factor-induced signal transduction in human cardiac fibroblasts

In the current study, first the platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-induced stimulation of the PDGF-beta receptor kinase in human cardiac fibroblasts was examined, and then the possibility of counterbalancing this signal transduction by carvedilol, a beta-blocker with alpha1-blocking properties, was investigated. Human cardiac fibroblasts were cultured from myocardial biopsy samples taken from patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. The stimulation of the PDGF-beta receptor kinase by recombinant human PDGF (BB) in the cells and the inhibitory effect of carvedilol (1, 5, 10, and 20 microM) were investigated by analyzing PDGF-induced PDGF receptor tyrosine phosphorylation using Western blotting and by measuring DNA synthesis with a colorimetric assay. In human cardiac fibroblasts, the PDGF receptor kinase could be stimulated with PDGF (100 ng/ml) and inhibited with carvedilol (5 microM). In addition, carvedilol at a concentration of 5 microM significantly decreased DNA synthesis by approximately 50%. The inhibition of PDGF-stimulated mitogenesis by carvedilol at concentrations of 10 and 20 microM was 64 or 75%, respectively. Other beta-adrenoceptor antagonists such as propranolol (10 microM) and metoprolol (10 microM) did not significantly affect the PDGF-induced beta-receptor autophosphorylation. These findings provide novel experimental support for the known beneficial clinical effects of carvedilol in the treatment of chronic heart failure associated with myocardial fibrosis.

Carvedilol in the failing heart

Patients with chronic heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction of ischemic or nonischemic etiology have shown improvement in morbidity and mortality with carvedilol therapy. In patients with symptomatic (New York Heart Association class II-IV) heart failure, carvedilol improves left ventricular ejection fraction and clinical status, and slows disease progression, reducing the combined risk of mortality and hospitalization. Despite the overwhelming evidence for their benefit, there continues to be a large treatment gap between those who would derive benefit and those who actually receive the drug. In this article, the pharmacology, clinical trial evidence, and the potential differences between carvedilol and other beta blockers are discussed. Carvedilol provides powerful therapy in the treatment of chronic heart failure caused by a variety of etiologies and in a wide array of clinical settings.

Neurohormonal activation, oxygen free radicals, and apoptosis in the pathogenesis of congestive heart failure

A variety of pathophysiologic processes are activated in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF), and some of these have been implicated in the progression of the disease. The most important processes to be activated in CHF are the neurohormonal systems, which include the renin-angiotensin system, the sympathetic nervous system, and the endothelin system. In addition to the neurohormonal systems, the formation of reactive oxygen free radicals is increased in patients with CHF. It has been postulated that stimulation of neurohormonal pathways and the formation of oxygen free radicals ultimately lead to the activation of a family of transcription factors that are involved in cardiac remodeling, which is a hallmark of CHF. In addition, the formation of oxygen free radicals has been implicated in the process of apoptosis or programmed cell death, which may be responsible for a continued loss of myocardial cells, resulting in the progressive decrease in left ventricular function that occurs over time in patients with CHF. Carvedilol is a multiple-action neurohormonal antagonist that is effective in slowing the progression of CHF. In double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials, carvedilol decreased mortality by 65% (p <0.001) and significantly reduced hospitalization. Carvedilol is a nonselective beta-blocker and vasodilator, the latter activity resulting from alpha1-adrenoceptor blockade. The hemodynamic responses produced by carvedilol result primarily from the blockade of beta1-, beta2-, and alpha1-adrenoceptors. Carvedilol reduces total peripheral vascular resistance and preload without significantly compromising cardiac output or eliciting reflex tachycardia. Carvedilol is also a potent antioxidant that may protect the myocardium from damage produced by oxygen radicals and, as a consequence of its antioxidant activity, carvedilol also inhibits apoptosis in the myocardium. The ability of carvedilol to inhibit apoptosis in the heart may be responsible, in part, for the ability of the drug to reduce mortality and to inhibit the progression of CHF.

Carvedilol enhances atrial and brain natriuretic peptide mRNA expression and release in rat heart

To clarify the role of the natriuretic peptide (NP) system in the myocardial protective effects of carvedilol, a beta-blocking agent, we investigated the effects of carvedilol on the NP system in the rat heart. After oral administration of carvedilol (low-dose group: 2 mg/kg/day, group C2; high-dose group: 20 mg/kg/day, group C20) for 1 week, plasma rat atrial NP (r-ANP), atrial mRNA levels of ANP, left ventricular mRNA of brain NP (BNP), NP receptor-A and NP receptor-C (NPR-C) (as a clearance receptor) were measured. Values were compared with those in vehicle-treatment rats (group V). The concentration of r-ANP was significantly higher in group C2 (135 +/- 9 pg/ml) and group C20 (161 +/- 11 pg/ml) than group V (75 +/- 6 pg/ml; both p < 0.01). ANP and BNP mRNA levels were significantly increased and NPR-C was significantly down regulated in group C2 (151 +/- 7, 120 +/- 8 and 78 +/- 7%, respectively, vs. group V) and group C20 (164 +/- 8. 133 +/- 7 and 72 +/- 8%, respectively, vs. group V) compared with group V (all p < 0.01). These results suggest that not only a high dose, but a low dose of carvedilol has the effect of increasing plasma ANP and BNP levels. This effect was closely related to the upregulation of ANP and BNP mRNA expression, and the down regulation of NPR-C mRNA expression in the heart. These mechanisms seem to account for a sizable portion of the protective effect of carvedilol for heart diseases.

Effects of carvedilol on isolated heart mitochondria: evidence for a protonophoretic mechanism

Carvedilol (¿1-[carbazolyl-(4)-oxy]-3-[2-methoxyphenoxyethyl)amino]-pro panol-(2) ¿) is a novel compound used in clinical practice for the treatment of congestive heart failure, mild to moderate hypertension, and myocardial infarction. Carvedilol was also shown to protect cardiac mitochondria from oxidative stress events. Because mitochondria are the main suppliers of ATP for cardiac muscle work, a study of the effects of carvedilol in mitochondrial bioenergetics is necessary to fully understand the basis of its protective role in myocardial energetics. In this work we show that carvedilol acts as an uncoupler of oxidative phosphorylation, decreasing mitochondrial electric potential (DeltaPsi) by a weak protonophoretic mechanism. Theoretical studies were carried out to determine the relevance of conformation and proton affinity of the protonable amino side-chain group in the proton-shuttling activity across the inner mitochondrial membrane. BM910228, a hydroxylated metabolite of carvedilol, was also studied for comparison with the parent compound. Implications for the protective role of carvedilol in heart mitochondrial bioenergetics are discussed.

Steady-state pharmacokinetics of carvedilol and its enantiomers in patients with congestive heart failure

Carvedilol is a relatively new drug with beta- and alpha 1-receptor blocking activity and antioxidant effects recently approved for the treatment of congestive heart failure (CHF). An ascending, multiple-dose study was completed in 20 male patients with stable New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III or IV CHF. The pharmacokinetics of carvedilol, S(-)-carvedilol, R(+)-carvedilol, and the active metabolites of carvedilol was assessed at steady state after twice-daily oral administration of carvedilol for 7 days at 6.25, 12.5, 25, and 50 mg doses. Carvedilol exhibited stereoselective pharmacokinetics in CHF patients with dose-proportional increases in steady-state plasma concentrations of carvedilol and its enantiomers. Mean AUC and Cmax values for carvedilol were up to twofold higher in patients with Class IV CHF as compared to those with Class III CHF. Steady-state plasma concentrations of the active metabolites also increased in a dose-proportional manner and were typically 10% or less of that observed for carvedilol. In general, carvedilol was adequately tolerated by adult male CHF patients at the dose levels (6.25-50 mg) evaluated in this study as adverse events were consistent with those frequently observed in patients with CHF.

Low dose carvedilol inhibits progression of heart failure in rats with dilated cardiomyopathy

The cardioprotective properties of carvedilol (a vasodilating beta-adrenoceptor blocking agent) were studied in a rat model of dilated cardiomyopathy induced by autoimmune myocarditis. Twenty-eight days after immunization, surviving Lewis rats (32/43=74%) were divided into three groups to be given 2 mg kg(-1) day(-1) (Group-C2, n=10) or 20 mg kg(-1) day(-1) (Group-C20, n=10) of carvedilol, or vehicle (0.5% methylcellulose, Group-V, n=12). After oral administration for 2 months, body weight, heart weight (HW), heart rate (HR), rat alpha-atrial natriuretic peptide (r-ANP) in blood, central venous pressure (CVP), mean blood pressure (mean BP), peak left ventricular pressure (LVP), left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), +/-dP dt(-1) and area of myocardial fibrosis were measured. Values were compared with those for normal Lewis rats (Group-N, n=10). Two out of 12 (17%) rats in Group-V died from day 28 to day 42 after immunization. No rat died in Groups-C2, -C20 and -N. Although the CVP, mean BP, LVP and +/-dP dt(-1) did not differ among the three groups, the HW, HR and r-ANP in Group-C2 (1.14+/-0.03, 339+/-16 and 135+/-31) and Group-C20 (1.23+/-0.04, 305+/-8 and 156+/-24) were significantly lower than those in Group-V (1.36+/-0.04 g, 389+/-9 beats min(-1) and 375+/-31 pg ml(-1), respectively). The LVEDP in Group-C2 was significantly lower than that in Group-V (7.4+/-1.4 and 12.2+/-1.2 mmHg, respectively, P<0. 05). The area of myocardial fibrosis in Group-C2 was smaller than that in Group-V (12+/-1 and 31+/-2%, P<0.01). These results indicate that a low dose of carvedilol has beneficial effects on dilated cardiomyopathy.

Carvedilol: a beta blocker with antioxidant property protects against gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity in rats

Gentamicin is an antibiotic effective against gram negative infections, whose clinical use is limited by its nephrotoxicity. Since the pathogenesis of gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity involves oxygen free radicals, the antioxidant carvedilol may protect against gentamicin-induced renal toxicity. We therefore tested this hypothesis using a rat model of gentamicin nephrotoxicity. Carvedilol (2 mg/kg) was administered intraperitoneally 3 days before and 8 days concurrently with gentamicin (80 mg/kg BW). Estimations of urine creatinine, glucose, blood urea, serum creatinine, plasma and kidney tissue malondialdehyde (MDA) were carried out, after the last dose of gentamicin. Kidneys were also examined for morphological changes. Gentamicin caused marked nephrotoxicity as evidenced by increase in blood urea, serum creatinine and decreased in creatinine clearance. Blood urea and serum creatinine was increased by 883% and 480% respectively with gentamicin compared to control. Carvedilol protected the rats from gentamicin induced nephrotoxicity. Rise in blood urea, serum creatinine and decrease in creatinine clearance was significantly prevented by carvedilol. There was 190% and 377% rise in plasma and kidney tissue MDA with gentamicin. Carvedilol prevented the gentamicin induced rise in both plasma and kidney tissue MDA. Kidney from gentamicin treated rats, histologically showed necrosis and desquamation of tubular epithelial cells in renal cortex, whereas it was very much comparable to control with carvedilol. In conclusion, carvedilol with its antioxidant property protected the rats from gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity.

Clinical Pharmacology of Carvedilol

BACKGROUND: There is now a wealth of data supporting the use of beta-blockers in heart failure and the additional pharmacological properties of carvedilol are thought to play an important role in the therapeutic efficacy of carvedilol in this disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: Carvedilol is licensed for the treatment of essential hypertension, chronic stable angina, and mild to moderate chronic heart failure. This article provides an up-to-date review of the clinical pharmacology of carvedilol, with particular emphasis on its clinical effects in heart failure. CONCLUSION: Carvedilol is a multiple-action neurohormonal antagonist that offers nonselective beta-blockade, alpha-1 blockade, antioxidant, anti-ischemic mortality, and anti-proliferative properties. In addition to reductions in hospitalization and mortality rates, benefits of carvedilol in heart failure include dramatic improvements in left ventricular function and other parameters of cardiac remodeling.

The role of neurohormonal antagonists in hibernating myocardium

Hibernating myocardium is characterized by chronic reduction of myocardial blood flow due to obstructive coronary artery disease, causing reversible left ventricular dysfunction and flow-metabolism mismatch. The condition is unstable and increasing demand may lead to further left ventricular dysfunction or necrosis causing death or worsening heart failure. Recognition of the condition is difficult and requires complex cardiac imaging protocols. Treatment protocols are also poorly defined. This review addresses both the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of hibernating myocardium.

Current Concepts in the Management of Heart Failure

Objective:

To give an overview of the epidemiology, etiology, and symptoms and signs of heart failure (HF), and the role of various therapeutic modalities that influence functional status, morbidity, and mortality in HF.

Data Sources:

Computerized search of the MEDLINE database (1976–1998) and review chapters from medical textbooks.

Data Extraction:

Clinical trials evaluating the effect of drugs on morbidity and mortality of patients with HF.

Data Synthesis:

HF is a clinical syndrome with high prevalence and mortality. The treatment approach varies depending on the etiology and type of HF. Several large-scale clinical trials with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors demonstrate improved survival and reduced hospitalization in patients with all degrees of HF. Several other trials report similar benefits in postmyocardial infarction patients with HF. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocking agents have also been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality in elderly patients with HF and may be used in patients who cannot tolerate ACE inhibitors. Therapy with hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate also improves exercise tolerance as well as survival in patients with HF. The combination of these agents with ACE inhibitors may be useful in patients who remain symptomatic while taking ACE inhibitors. Such second-generation dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers as amlodipine have also been shown to improve symptoms, exercise tolerance, and survival in nonischemic patients. Diuretics are effective in reducing the symptoms of HF resulting from fluid overload. Inotropic drugs such as digoxin may improve symptoms and reduce hospitalization for patients with HF but do not reduce overall mortality. Long-term, continuous use of inotropic agents, such as amrinone, milrinone, dobutamine, and high-dose vesnarinone, may improve quality of life but increase mortality in HF. Beta-blockers, particularly Carvedilol, with vasodilating properties demonstrate positive survival results in patients with mild-to-moderate HF.

Conclusions:

ACE inhibitors are the initial drug of choice in the treatment of HF; however, angiotensin II receptor antagonists may be used in patients who are intolerant to ACE inhibitors. Diuretics are useful mainly to control the fluid overload in HF. Digoxin is helpful in patients with atrial fibrillation and rapid ventricular response and in patients who are resistant to ACE inhibitors and diuretics. Hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate therapy is valuable in patients whose symptoms cannot be controlled with optimal doses of diuretics, digoxin, and ACE inhibitors. Careful use of newer beta-blockers, with optimal titration of diuretics, in mild-to-moderate HF may help prolong life. Newer dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers may be beneficial in nonischemic patients with HF.

Comparative effects of carvedilol and metoprolol on cardiac ischemia-reperfusion injury

The effects of carvedilol, a multiple-action neurohormonal antagonist, and metoprolol, a highly selective beta1 antagonist, were compared on postischemic contractile recovery and contracture. Isolated rabbit hearts were aerobically perfused for 45 min and subjected to zero-flow normothermic ischemia for 30 or 60 min followed by reperfusion for 30 min. Carvedilol and metoprolol were added to the perfusion solution 10 min before inducing ischemia and were maintained in the perfusate throughout reperfusion. Left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP) and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) were assessed with an intraventricular balloon. Because the volume of the balloon was held constant, an increase in LVEDP reflected an increase in diastolic chamber stiffness or "contracture." After 30 min of ischemia, the carvedilol-treated hearts exhibited a significantly better cardiac function than did control or metoprolol-treated hearts. At the end of reperfusion, the control group LVDP recovered to 21.4+/-9.9% of the preischemic value. With 0.03, 0.1, and 0.3 microM metoprolol, LVDP recovered to 33.2+/-13.6%, 41.7+/-13.0%, and 48.8+/-13.3% of initial developed pressure, respectively. In the carvedilol group, a greater recovery of LVDP was obtained at 0.03, 0.1, and 0.3 microM: 64.0+/-2.5%, 60.4+/-6.3%, and 68.0+/-2.0% of preischemic values, respectively (p < 0.05 vs. controls). Within the first 5 min of reperfusion, LVEDP increased to 70.3+/-2.7 mm Hg in control hearts, indicating a pronounced contracture, whereas metoprolol reduced LVEDP when given at high concentration, 0.3 microM (41.9+/-10.7 mm Hg). Carvedilol, even at the lowest concentration, 0.03 microM, almost completely inhibited the postischemic contracture (16.5+/-4.0 mm Hg; p < 0.05 vs. control and metoprolol). The cardioprotection provided by carvedilol also is observed in hearts subjected to more severe ischemic periods. After 60 min of ischemia, control hearts failed to restore LVDP function; in the metoprolol group, ventricular function recovered to only 4.6+/-3.1%, whereas carvedilol-treated hearts exhibited 23.6+/-1.9% of preischemic values at the end of reperfusion. In addition, carvedilol induced a reduction in ischemic contracture: control, 36.7+/-3 mm Hg; metoprolol, 38.7+/-3.7 mm Hg; and carvedilol, 15.7+/-8.4 mm Hg at 50 min of ischemia. Similarly, carvedilol reduced contracture during the reperfusion compared with metoprolol and control groups (83.2+/-3.4 mm Hg, 106.9+/-3.3 mm Hg, and 107.6+/-4.1 mm Hg, respectively). These data clearly demonstrate that carvedilol was markedly more effective than metoprolol to protect systolic function after ischemia and to reduce postischemic contracture.

Beneficial effects of intravenous and oral carvedilol treatment in acute myocardial infarction. A placebo-controlled, randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Evidence of efficacy and safety of beta-blockers after thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is equivocal. Newer beta-blockers such as carvedilol have not been tested in this setting.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study investigated the effects of acute (intravenous) and long-term (6 months, oral) treatment with carvedilol versus placebo in 151 consecutive patients with AMI. Exercise ECG, ambulatory monitoring, and two-dimensional echocardiography were performed before hospital discharge and at 3 and 6 months. All patients were followed up and cardiovascular events recorded. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare time from randomization with the occurrence of a cardiovascular event, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated. Carvedilol was found to be safe, and it significantly reduced cardiac events compared with placebo (18 on carvedilol and 31 on placebo, P < .02). Fifty-four patients had heart failure at study entry; 34 received carvedilol. There were no adverse effects of carvedilol therapy and no excess events in this subgroup. Carvedilol produced significant reductions in heart rate (P < .0001), blood pressure (P < .005) at rest, and rate-pressure product at peak exercise (P < .003), but exercise capacity was unchanged. Left ventricular ejection fraction was not altered significantly by carvedilol, but stroke volume was higher at pre-hospital discharge examination (63 versus 53 mL; P < .01). Diastolic filling of the left ventricle (E/A ratio) was also improved (1.2 versus 0.9; P < .001). In a subgroup with left ventricular ejection fraction < 45% (n = 49 patients; 24 on carvedilol and 25 on placebo), carvedilol showed attenuation of remodeling.

CONCLUSIONS

Carvedilol was well tolerated and safe to use in patients immediately after AMI, including those with heart failure, and significantly improved outcome.

Carvedilol protects against lethal reperfusion injury through antiadrenergic mechanisms

We examined the effect of carvedilol as compared with that of a combination of propranolol and doxazosin on lethal reperfusion injury in 21 feline hearts subjected to 40-min regional ischemia and 180-min reperfusion. A control group (n = 7) was compared with one group given carvedilol, a nonselective beta - and alpha 1-adrenoceptor blocker and antioxidant (n = 7) and another group given nonselective beta - and alpha 1-adrenoceptor blockade with propranolol and doxazosin (n = 7) during initial reperfusion. Infarct size (IS: percent of area at risk, AAR) determined by staining the myocardium with triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC), was reduced both in the carvedilol-treated group (median 1.8%, p < 0.05) and in the group given propranolol/doxazosin (median 6.5%, p < 0.05) as compared with controls (median 14.4%). Treatment with carvedilol reduced IS more than did treatment with propranolol/doxazosin (p < 0.05). Longitudinal segment shortening measured with sonomicrometry, improved in both treatment groups as compared with control (p < 0.05), but to a greater extent in the group treated with carvedilol. In circumferential segments, only carvedilol significantly improved segment shortening. The incidence of ventricular fibrillation (VF) after reperfusion was reduced in both treatment groups as compared with control. Oxidized glutathione and thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) measured at the end of reperfusion did not differ between groups. Carvedilol protected against lethal reperfusion injury mainly through blockade of adrenoceptors.

The place of beta-blockers in the treatment of hypertension in 1993

beta-blockers are one of the first-line therapeutic alternatives for the treatment of hypertension. Their role in this position appears stronger than earlier in view of the results of the three large intervention trials in elderly hypertensive patients (SHEP, STOP-Hypertension and MRC), which all used beta-blockers as one of their therapeutic alternatives. The secondary preventive effect of beta-blockers against coronary heart disease is well established, whereas convincing evidence from placebo-controlled trials regarding their primary preventive effect still is missing. In animal studies beta-blockers have been shown to prevent the development of coronary atherosclerosis and some of the newer agents have been shown to be markedly effective against experimentally induced myocardial ischemia. For reasons such as these, it appears safe to predict that beta-blockers will continue to play an important therapeutic role also in 1993 and beyond.

Pathogenesis and treatment perspectives of chronic graft rejection (CVR)

Chronic rejection is a major threat towards the long-term function and survival of transplanted hearts and kidneys. It is characterized by a proliferative remodelling of the graft vessels along with structural changes of the parenchyma and gradual deterioration of graft function. The pathogenesis is complex and multifactorial. Since grafts with chronic rejection are also subjected to a more or less intense invasion of immunoreactive cells, an important primary objective is to optimize the immunosuppressive treatment. There is no established means of prevention or treatment of chronic rejection. Pharmacological agents interfering with prostaglandin metabolism have been tried most frequently and preliminary results are also available from the use of polyunsaturated fatty acids of the omega-3 series and of heparin derivatives. Based on experimental studies the somatostatin analogue angiopeptin seems very promising today. There will certainly be an increased interest in the use of lipid-reducing agents in the future as well as antioxidant agents acting against the effects of reactive oxygen radicals and oxidative modification of LDL fractions. A strong novel candidate is carvedilol, exerting both antihypertensive, antioxidant and antiproliferative properties.