Lamotrigine in treatment of 120 children with epilepsy

Movement Disorders Secondary to Novel Antiseizure Medications in Pediatric Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Risk

Novel antiseizure medications are thought to be safer than their conventional counterparts, though no dedicated analysis of movement disorder risk among pediatric populations using novel antiseizure medications has been completed. We report a systematic review with meta-analysis describing the relationship between novel antiseizure medications and movement disorders in pediatrics.MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched up to October 2020 for randomized controlled trials investigating novel antiseizure medications in pediatric populations. Antiseizure medications included lacosamide, perampanel, eslicarbazepine, rufinamide, fenfluramine, cannabidiol, and brivaracetam. Outcomes were pooled using random effects models; risk difference (RD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.Twenty-three studies were selected from 1690 nonredundant manuscripts (n = 1912 total). There was a significantly increased risk of movement disorders associated with perampanel (RD 0.07, 95% CI 0.01-0.13; n = 133), though only 1 relevant trial was found. No increased risk of movement disorders was found with other antiseizure medications.Our findings indicate most novel antiseizure medications are safe to use in pediatric populations with respect to movement disorders. However, findings were limited by quality of adverse event reporting.

Therapeutic Options for Childhood Absence Epilepsy

Childhood absence epilepsy (CAE) is a common pediatric generalized epileptic syndrome. Although it is traditionally considered as a benign self-limited condition, the apparent benign nature of this syndrome has been revaluated in recent years. This is mainly due to the increasing evidence that children with CAE can present invalidating neuropsychological comorbidities that will affect them up to adulthood. Moreover, a percentage of affected children can develop drug-resistant forms of CAE. The purpose of this review is to summarize the most recent studies and new concepts concerning CAE treatment, in particular concerning drug-resistant forms of CAE. A Pubmed search was undertaken to identify all articles concerning management and treatment of CAE, including articles written between 1979 and 2021. Traditional anticonvulsant therapy of CAE that is still in use is based on three antiepileptic drugs: ethosuximide which is the drug of choice, followed by valproic acid and lamotrigine. In the case of first line treatment failure, after two monotherapies it is usual to start a bi-therapy. In the case of absence seizures that are refractory to traditional treatment, other antiepileptic drugs may be introduced such as levetiracetam, topiramate and zonisamide.

Ethosuximide, sodium valproate or lamotrigine for absence seizures in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

This is an updated version of the Cochrane Review previously published in 2019. Absence seizures (AS) are brief epileptic seizures which present in childhood and adolescence. Depending on clinical features and electroencephalogram (EEG) findings they are divided into typical, atypical absences, and absences with special features. Typical absences are characterised by sudden loss of awareness and an EEG typically shows generalised spike wave discharges at three cycles per second. Ethosuximide, valproate and lamotrigine are currently used to treat absence seizures. This review aims to determine the best choice of antiepileptic drug for children and adolescents with AS.

OBJECTIVES

To review the evidence for the effects of ethosuximide, valproate and lamotrigine as treatments for children and adolescents with absence seizures (AS), when compared with placebo or each other.

SEARCH METHODS

For the latest update we searched the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web, 22 September 2020) and MEDLINE (Ovid, 1946 to September 21, 2020). CRS Web includes randomised or quasi-randomised, controlled trials from PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the Specialized Registers of Cochrane Review Groups including Epilepsy. No language restrictions were imposed. In addition, we contacted Sanofi Winthrop, Glaxo Wellcome (now GlaxoSmithKline) and Parke Davis (now Pfizer), manufacturers of sodium valproate, lamotrigine and ethosuximide respectively.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised parallel group monotherapy or add-on trials which include a comparison of any of the following in children or adolescents with AS: ethosuximide, sodium valproate, lamotrigine, or placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Outcome measures were: 1. proportion of individuals seizure free at one, three, six, 12 and 18 months post randomisation; 2. individuals with a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency; 3. normalisation of EEG and/or negative hyperventilation test; and 4. adverse effects. Data were independently extracted by two review authors. Results are presented as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). We used GRADE quality assessment criteria to evaluate the certainty of evidence for the outcomes derived from all included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

On the basis of our selection criteria, we included no new studies in the present review. Eight small trials (total number of participants: 691) were included from the earlier review. Six of them were of poor methodological quality (unclear or high risk of bias) and seven recruited less than 50 participants. There are no placebo-controlled trials for ethosuximide or valproate, and hence, no evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to support a specific effect on AS for either of these two drugs. Due to the differing methodologies used in the trials comparing ethosuximide, lamotrigine and valproate, we thought it inappropriate to undertake a meta-analysis. One large randomised, parallel double-blind controlled trial comparing ethosuximide, lamotrigine and sodium valproate in 453 children with newly diagnosed childhood absence epilepsy found that at 12 months, seizure freedom was higher in patients taking ethosuximide (70/154, 45%) than in patients taking lamotrigine (31/146, 21%; P < 0.001), with no difference between valproate (64/146, 44%) and ethosuximide (70/154, 45%; P > 0.05). In this study, the frequency of treatment failures due to intolerable adverse events was significantly different among the treatment groups, with the largest proportion of adverse events in the valproic acid group (48/146, 33%) compared to the ethosuximide (38/154, 25%) and the lamotrigine (29/146, 20%) groups (P < 0.037). Overall, this large study demonstrates the superior effectiveness of ethosuximide and valproic acid compared to lamotrigine as initial monotherapy aimed to control seizures without intolerable adverse effects in children with childhood absence epilepsy. This study provided high certainty of the evidence for outcomes for which data were available. However, the certainty of the evidence provided by the other included studies was low, primarily due to risk of bias and imprecise results because of the small sample sizes. Hence, conclusions regarding the efficacy of ethosuximide, valproic acid and lamotrigine derive mostly from this single study.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Since the last version of this review was published, we have found no new studies. Hence, the conclusions remain the same as the previous update. With regards to both efficacy and tolerability, ethosuximide represents the optimal initial empirical monotherapy for children and adolescents with AS. However, if absence and generalised tonic-clonic seizures coexist, valproate should be preferred, as ethosuximide is probably inefficacious on tonic-clonic seizures.

Drug Development for Rare Paediatric Epilepsies: Current State and Future Directions

Rare diseases provide a challenge in the evaluation of new therapies. However, orphan drug development is of increasing interest because of the legislation enabling facilitated support by regulatory agencies through scientific advice, and the protection of the molecules with orphan designation. In the landscape of the rare epilepsies, very few syndromes, namely Dravet syndrome, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and West syndrome, have been subject to orphan drug development. Despite orphan designations for rare epilepsies having dramatically increased in the past 10 years, the number of approved drugs remains limited and restricted to a handful of epilepsy syndromes. In this paper, we describe the current state of orphan drug development for rare epilepsies. We identified a large number of compounds currently under investigation, but mostly in the same rare epilepsy syndromes as in the past. A rationale for further development in rare epilepsies could be based on the match between the drug mechanisms of action and the knowledge of the causative gene mutation or by evidence from animal models. In case of the absence of strong pathophysiological hypotheses, exploratory/basket clinical studies could be helpful to identify a subpopulation that may benefit from the new drug. We provide some suggestions for future improvements in orphan drug development such as promoting paediatric drug investigations, better evaluation of the incidence and the prevalence, together with the natural history data, and the development of new primary outcomes.

Application of the QbD-based approach in the early development of liposomes for nasal administration

In this study, authors adapt the Quality by Design (QbD) concept as well as the Risk Assessment (RA) method to the early development phase of a new nano-sized liposomal formulation for nasal administration with brain target. As a model active agent, a BCS II class drug was chosen to investigate the behaviour of the drugs with lipophilic character. This research presents how to apply this risk-focused approach and concentrates on the first four stages of the QbD implementation. In this way the quality target product profile was defined, the critical factors were identified and an RA was performed. The RA results helped in the factorial design-based liposome preparation by the lipid film hydration method. The prepared liposomes were evaluated (vesicle size, size distribution, and specific surface area). The surface characteristics were also investigated to verify the exactness of the RA and critical factors based theoretical prediction. The results confirm that the QbD approach in liposome development can improve the formulation process. The RA focused predictive approach resulted in a decreased number of studies in practice but in an effective product preparation. Using such innovative design and development models can help to optimise and rationalise the development of liposomes.

Ethosuximide, sodium valproate or lamotrigine for absence seizures in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

This is an updated version of the Cochrane Review previously published in 2017.Absence seizures (AS) are brief epileptic seizures which present in childhood and adolescence. Depending on clinical features and electroencephalogram (EEG) findings they are divided into typical, atypical absences, and absences with special features. Typical absences are characterised by sudden loss of awareness and an EEG typically shows generalised spike wave discharges at three cycles per second. Ethosuximide, valproate and lamotrigine are currently used to treat absence seizures. This review aims to determine the best choice of antiepileptic drug for children and adolescents with AS.

OBJECTIVES

To review the evidence for the effects of ethosuximide, valproate and lamotrigine as treatments for children and adolescents with absence seizures (AS), when compared with placebo or each other.

SEARCH METHODS

For the latest update we searched the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web, 29 May 2018), which includes the Cochrane Epilepsy Group's Specialized Register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (Ovid, 1946 to 29 May 2018), ClinicalTrials.gov (29 May 2018) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP, 29 May 2018). Previously we searched Embase (1988 to March 2005) and SCOPUS (1823 to 31 March 2014), but this is no longer necessary because randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in Embase and SCOPUS are now included in CENTRAL. No language restrictions were imposed. In addition, we contacted Sanofi Winthrop, Glaxo Wellcome (now GlaxoSmithKline) and Parke Davis (now Pfizer), manufacturers of sodium valproate, lamotrigine and ethosuximide respectively.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised parallel group monotherapy or add-on trials which include a comparison of any of the following in children or adolescents with AS: ethosuximide, sodium valproate, lamotrigine, or placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Outcome measures were: (1) proportion of individuals seizure free at one, three, six, 12 and 18 months post randomisation; (2) people with a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency; (3) normalisation of EEG and/or negative hyperventilation test; and (4) adverse effects. Data were independently extracted by two review authors. Results are presented as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). We used GRADE quality assessment criteria to evaluate the certainty of evidence derived from all included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

On the basis of our selection criteria, we included no new studies in the present review. Eight small trials (total number of participants: 691) were included from the earlier review. Six of them were of poor methodological quality (unclear or high risk of bias) and seven recruited less than 50 participants. There are no placebo-controlled trials for ethosuximide or valproate, and hence, no evidence from RCTs to support a specific effect on AS for either of these two drugs. Due to the differing methodologies used in the trials comparing ethosuximide, lamotrigine and valproate, we thought it inappropriate to undertake a meta-analysis. One large randomised, parallel double-blind controlled trial comparing ethosuximide, lamotrigine and sodium valproate in 453 children with newly diagnosed childhood absence epilepsy found that at 12 months, the freedom-from-failure rates for ethosuximide and valproic acid were similar and were higher than the rate for lamotrigine. The frequency of treatment failures due to lack of seizure control (P < 0.001) and intolerable adverse events (P < 0.037) was significantly different among the treatment groups, with the largest proportion of lack of seizure control in the lamotrigine cohort, and the largest proportion of adverse events in the valproic acid group. Overall, this large study demonstrates the superior effectiveness of ethosuximide and valproic acid compared to lamotrigine as initial monotherapy aimed to control seizures without intolerable adverse effects in children with childhood absence epilepsy. The risk of bias for this study was low. We rated the overall certainty of the evidence available from the included studies to be moderate or high.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Since the last version of this review was published, we have found no new studies. Hence, the conclusions remain the same as the previous update. With regards to both efficacy and tolerability, ethosuximide represents the optimal initial empirical monotherapy for children and adolescents with AS. However, if absence and generalised tonic-clonic seizures coexist, valproate should be preferred, as ethosuximide is probably inefficacious on tonic-clonic seizures.

A Practical Guide to Treatment of Childhood Absence Epilepsy

Childhood absence epilepsy (CAE) is a common pediatric epilepsy syndrome with distinct seizure semiology, electroencephalography (EEG) features, and treatment. A diagnosis of CAE can be obtained during an office visit with a careful history, physical exam including prolonged hyperventilation, and a routine EEG. The treatment of choice for CAE with absence seizures only is ethosuximide. Valproic acid and lamotrigine are also effective treatments for many patients, but when compared to ethosuximide, valproic acid has more adverse effects and lamotrigine is less effective. Attention to predictors of response to treatment, including clinical, electrographic, and genetic factors, is increasing. Refractory CAE occurs in fewer than half of patients, and treatment strategies are available, though efficacy data are lacking. Careful assessment and treatment of psychosocial comorbidities is essential in caring for patients with CAE.

Cognitive and Behavioral Comorbidities: An Unwanted Effect of Antiepileptic Drugs in Children

Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders and, despite optimally chosen and dosed antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), approximately 20%-30% of patients will continue to have seizures. Behavior and cognition are negatively impacted by seizures, but AEDs are also a major contributor to behavioral and cognitive deficits. However, the cognitive and behavioral effect of AEDs in children is insufficiently emphasized in the literature. This review summarizes the cognitive and behavioral effects of AEDs in the pediatric population with the objective of helping pediatricians and pediatric neurologists to select the AEDs with the best profile for their individual patient's needs.

Ethosuximide, sodium valproate or lamotrigine for absence seizures in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review originally published in 2003, Issue 3, and updated in 2005, Issue 4.Absence seizures are brief epileptic seizures which present in childhood and adolescence. Depending on clinical features and electroencephalogram (EEG) findings they are divided into typical, atypical absences, and absences with special features. Typical absences are characterised by sudden loss of awareness and an EEG typically shows generalised spike wave discharges at three cycles per second. Ethosuximide, valproate and lamotrigine are currently used to treat absence seizures. This review aims to determine the best choice of antiepileptic drug for children and adolescents with typical absence seizures.

OBJECTIVES

To review the evidence for the effects of ethosuximide, valproate and lamotrigine as treatments for children and adolescents with absence seizures, when compared with placebo or each other.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group's Specialized Register (1 September 2016), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) via the Cochrane Register of Studies Online (CRSO, 1 September 2016), MEDLINE (Ovid, 1946 to 1 September 2016), ClinicalTrials.gov (1 September 2016) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform ICTRP (1 September 2016). Previously we searched Embase (1988 to March 2005) and SCOPUS (1823 to 31 March 2014). No language restrictions were imposed. In addition, we contacted Sanofi Winthrop, Glaxo Wellcome (now GlaxoSmithKline) and Parke Davis (now Pfizer), manufacturers of sodium valproate, lamotrigine and ethosuximide respectively.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised parallel group monotherapy or add-on trials which include a comparison of any of the following in children or adolescents with absence seizures: ethosuximide; sodium valproate; lamotrigine; or placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Outcome measures were: (1) proportion of individuals seizure free at one, three, six, 12 and 18 months post randomisation; (2) people with a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency; (3) normalisation of EEG and/or negative hyperventilation test; and (4) adverse effects. Data were independently extracted by two review authors. Results are presented as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).

MAIN RESULTS

Eight small trials were found (three of them not included in the previous version of the review). Six of them were of poor methodological quality and seven recruited less than 50 participants. There are no placebo-controlled trials for ethosuximide or valproate, and hence, no evidence from randomised controlled trials to support a specific effect on absence seizures for either of these two drugs. Due to the differing methodologies used in the trials comparing ethosuximide, lamotrigine and valproate, we thought it inappropriate to undertake a meta-analysis. One large randomised, parallel double-blind controlled trial comparing ethosuximide, lamotrigine and sodium valproate in children with newly diagnosed childhood absence epilepsy found that at 12 months, the freedom-from-failure rates for ethosuximide and valproic acid (VPA) were similar and were higher than the rate for lamotrigine. The frequency of treatment failures due to lack of seizure control (P < 0.001) and intolerable adverse events (P < 0.037) was significantly different among the treatment groups, with the largest proportion of lack of seizure control in the lamotrigine cohort, and the largest proportion of adverse events in the VPA group. Overall, this large study demonstrates the superior effectiveness of ethosuximide and VPA compared to lamotrigine as initial monotherapy aimed to control seizures without intolerable adverse effects in children with childhood absence epilepsy.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

With regards to both efficacy and tolerability, ethosuximide represents the optimal initial empirical monotherapy for children and adolescents with absence seizures. However, if absence and generalised tonic-clonic seizures coexist, valproate should be preferred, as ethosuximide is probably inefficacious on tonic-clonic seizures.

Not all that glitters is gold: A guide to the critical interpretation of drug trials in epilepsy

Clinical trials represent the best source of evidence on which to base treatment decisions. For such evidence to be utilized meaningfully, however, it is essential that results are interpreted correctly. This requires a good understanding of strengths and weaknesses of the adopted design, the clinical relevance of the outcome measures, and the many factors that could affect such outcomes. As a general rule, uncontrolled studies tend to provide misleading evidence as a result of the impact of confounders such as regression to the mean, patient‐related bias, and observer bias. On the other hand, although randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are qualitatively superior, aspects of their execution may still decrease their validity. Bias and decreased validity in RCTs may occur by chance alone (for example, treatment groups may not necessarily be balanced for important variables despite randomization) or because of specific features of the trial design. In the case of industry‐driven studies, bias often influences the outcome in favor of the sponsor's product. Factors that need to be carefully scrutinized include (1) the purpose for which the trial is conducted; (2) potential bias due to unblinding or lack of blinding; (3) the appropriateness of the control group; (4) the power of the study in detecting clinically relevant differences; (5) the extent to which eligibility criteria could affect outcomes and be representative of routine clinical practice; (6) whether the treatments being compared are used optimally in terms of dosing, duration of treatment, and other variables; (7) the appropriateness of the statistical comparisons; (8) the clinical relevance of the outcome measures and whether all key outcome information is reported (for example, responder rates in completers); and (9) potential bias in the way results are presented and discussed. This article discusses each of these aspects and illustrates the discussion with examples taken from published antiepileptic drug trials.

Beyond neural cubism: promoting a multidimensional view of brain disorders by enhancing the integration of neurology and psychiatry in education

Cubism was an influential early-20th-century art movement characterized by angular, disjointed imagery. The two-dimensional appearance of Cubist figures and objects is created through juxtaposition of angles. The authors posit that the constrained perspectives found in Cubism may also be found in the clinical classification of brain disorders. Neurological disorders are often separated from psychiatric disorders as if they stemmed from different organ systems. Maintaining two isolated clinical disciplines fractionalizes the brain in the same way that Pablo Picasso fractionalized figures and objects in his Cubist art. This Neural Cubism perpetuates a clinical divide that does not reflect the scope and depth of neuroscience. All brain disorders are complex and multidimensional, with aberrant circuitry and resultant psychopharmacology manifesting as altered behavior, affect, mood, or cognition. Trainees should receive a multidimensional education based on modern neuroscience, not a partial education based on clinical precedent. The authors briefly outline the rationale for increasing the integration of neurology and psychiatry and discuss a nested model with which clinical neuroscientists (neurologists and psychiatrists) can approach and treat brain disorders.

Drug-induced cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Cerebellar ataxia can be induced by a large number of drugs. We here conducted a systemic review of the drugs that can lead to cerebellar ataxia as an adverse drug reaction (ADR).

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search in Pubmed (1966 to January 2014) and EMBASE (1988 to January 2014) to identify all of the drugs that can have ataxia as an ADR and to assess the frequency of drug-induced ataxia for individual drugs. Furthermore, we collected reports of drug-induced ataxia over the past 20 years in the Netherlands by querying a national register of ADRs.

RESULTS

Drug-induced ataxia was reported in association with 93 individual drugs (57 from the literature, 36 from the Dutch registry). The most common groups were antiepileptic drugs, benzodiazepines, and antineoplastics. For some, the number needed to harm was below 10. Ataxia was commonly reversible, but persistent symptoms were described with lithium and certain antineoplastics.

CONCLUSIONS

It is important to be aware of the possibility that ataxia might be drug-induced, and for some drugs the relative frequency of this particular ADR is high. In most patients, symptoms occur within days or weeks after the introduction of a new drug or an increase in dose. In general, ataxia tends to disappear after discontinuation of the drug, but chronic ataxia has been described for some drugs.

The treatment of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy

Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy is a common type of epilepsy with onset occurring during adolescence. This review provides a collection of evidence relating to the treatment of this type of epilepsy. Historically, the large majority of patients become seizure-free when treated with valproate. Over recent years, there has been a marked improvement in the pharmacological armamentarium by the physicians. Currently, administration of new antiepileptic drugs, such as levetiracetam, lamotrigine and topiramate, seems to have beneficial effects in the patients with poor response to valproate.

Lamotrigine use in twelve patients with the Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome

This brief report describes the effects of lamotrigine on 12 patients with the Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome in an open, uncontrolled study. Three patients are seizure free and five others substantially improved. Seven of these eight patients have shown a marked improvement in quality of life. Lamotrigine is an extremely useful adjunct in the management of the Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome.

Treatment of infantile spasms

BACKGROUND

Infantile spasms (West's Syndrome) is a syndrome that includes a peculiar type of epileptic seizure-the spasms-and an electroencephalographic (EEG) abnormality often called hypsarrhythmia. Psychomotor retardation is frequently found at follow-up. Approximately two-thirds of affected infants will have a detectable underlying neurological abnormality, but still little is known about the pathophysiological basis for infantile spasms, and treatment remains problematic.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of single pharmaceutical therapies used to treat infantile spasms in terms of control of the spasms, resolution of the EEG, relapse rates, psychomotor development, subsequent epilepsy, side effects, and mortality.

SEARCH METHODS

To identify published data, we searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialised Register (October 2012), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 9), MEDLINE (1946 to September Week 4, 2012), EMBASE (1980 to March 2003), and the reference lists of all retrieved articles.To identify unpublished data, we searched the ISRCTN Register (www.controlled-trials.com), corresponded with colleagues and drug companies, and made requests at international conferences.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of the administration of drug therapy to patients with infantile spasms.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data collection from all relevant publications was independently undertaken by three review authors (before 2010) or by two review authors using a standard proforma. Analysis included assessment of study quality and a search for sources of heterogeneity.

MAIN RESULTS

We found 16 small RCTs (fewer than 100 patients enrolled) and 2 larger RCTs (more than 100 patients enrolled). These 18 studies looked at a total of 916 patients treated with a total of 12 different pharmaceutical agents. Overall methodology of the studies was poor, in part because of ethical dilemmas such as giving placebo injections to children. Two studies showed that placebo was not as good as active treatment in resolving the spasms. The strongest evidence suggested that hormonal treatment (prednisolone or tetracosactide depot) leads to resolution of spasms faster and in more infants than does vigabatrin. Responses without subsequent relapse may be no different. The same study suggests that hormonal treatments might improve the long-term developmental outcome compared with vigabatrin in infants not found to have an underlying cause for their infantile spasms.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

To date, few well-designed RCTs have considered the treatment of infantile spasms, and the numbers of patients enrolled have been small. In the majority, methodology has been poor, hence it is not clear which treatment is optimal in the treatment of this epilepsy syndrome. Hormonal treatment resolves spasms in more infants than vigabatrin, but this may or may not translate into better long-term outcomes. If prednisolone or vigabatrin is used, high dosage is recommended. Vigabatrin may be the treatment of choice in tuberous sclerosis. Resolution of the EEG features may be important, but this has not been proven. Further research using large studies with robust methodology is required.

A revisited strategy for antiepileptic drug development in children: designing an initial exploratory step

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in refractory paediatric epilepsy usually involve the two main types of epilepsy shared by children and adults, focal epilepsy and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS). Most other epilepsy syndromes, specifically paediatric, are excluded from drug development. In order to identify among them the candidate(s) for dedicated RCTs with a new drug, the European Medicine Agency (EMA) recently recommended proceeding in two steps: (1) an exploratory (prospective-observational) trial (POT) including a large variety of paediatric epilepsy syndromes and (2) a subsequent RCT in each of those that disclose a signal for possible efficacy.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to address the three following issues that have not been addressed by the EMA: (1) to determine a minimal threshold for this signal; (2) to establish a list of epilepsies to evaluate; and (3) to estimate the number of patients to include in such POTs.

METHODS

We extensively reviewed the POTs (including various syndromes) and RCTs reported in paediatric patients with uncontrolled epilepsy using MEDLINE (from 1990 to 2011) and the Cochrane library. We determined the threshold as the lowest percentage of responders observed in a POT with a positive corresponding RCT. The syndromes that reached this threshold in a POT were those to evaluate in an RCT. The minimal number of patients to include for each syndrome for a POT with a new antiepileptic drug was estimated in order to reach at least this threshold of responders with a 95 % confidence interval.

RESULTS

We found the minimal responder threshold to be 25 %. We identified eight epilepsy types/syndromes reaching this threshold and estimated for each of them the minimal sample needed: refractory focal epilepsy (n = 40), Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (n = 32), infantile spasms (n = 50), Dravet syndrome (n = 32), childhood absence epilepsy (n = 12), other symptomatic generalized epilepsy (n = 38), epileptic encephalopathy with continuous spikes and waves during sleep (n = 7) and epilepsy with myoclonic-astatic seizures (n = 4) [the two last samples may be underestimated due to the lack of RCTs in these conditions].

CONCLUSION

Among the eight epilepsy types/syndromes that we recommend to systematically include in exploratory trials using the POT procedure, we assume that, for the minimal sample given above, a responder threshold of 25 % will provide a reliable efficacy signal, to be confirmed by a dedicated RCT. This strategy should avoid missing new therapeutic possibilities for children with epilepsy and reduce the off-label use of drugs in paediatric neurology.

Clobazam as an adjunctive therapy in treating seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome

Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is a devastating childhood epilepsy syndrome characterized by the occurrence of multiple types of seizures and cognitive decline. Most children suffer from frequent seizures that are refractory to current medical management. Recent clinical trials have suggested that addition of clobazam may improve the clinical outcome for some LGS patients. Although clobazam has been available for over five decades, it has only recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for this indication. As a 1,5-benzodiazepine, clobazam is structurally related to the widely used 1,4-benzodiazepines, which include diazepam. Clobazam has been shown to modulate GABAergic neurotransmission by positive allosteric modulation of GABA(A) receptors, and to increase expression of transporters for both GABA and glutamate. The active metabolite n-desmethylclobazam (norclobazam) also modulates GABA(A) receptors, and the relative importance of these two compounds in the clinical effectiveness of clobazam remains an open question. Clinical trials involving clobazam as an addon therapy in a variety of pediatric epilepsy populations have found a significant improvement in seizure control. In patients with LGS, clobazam may have greatest efficacy for drop seizures. Longstanding clinical experience suggests that clobazam is a safe and well tolerated antiepileptic drug with infrequent and mild adverse effects. These results suggest that adjunctive treatment with clobazam may be a reasonable option for LGS patients, particularly those who are treatment-resistant.

The safety and tolerability of newer antiepileptic drugs in children and adolescents

The newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) provide more therapeutic options and overall improved safety and tolerability for patients. To provide the best care, physicians must be familiar with the latest tolerability and safety data. This is particularly true in children, given there are relatively fewer studies examining the effects of AEDs in children compared with adults. Since we now have significant paediatric literature on each of these agents, we provide a comprehensive and current literature review of the newer AEDs, focusing on safety and tolerability data in children and adolescents. Because the safety profiles in children differ from those in adults, familiarity with this literature is important for child neurologists and other paediatric caregivers. We have organized the data by organ system for each AED for easier reference.

Reversible lamotrigine-induced neurobehavioral disturbances in children with epilepsy

A retrospective review was performed in patients who developed neurobehavioral adverse reactions to lamotrigine. Data were obtained from interviews, examinations, and routine medical records. There were 7 male and 2 female patients with epilepsy with a mean age of 5 years. All 9 patients became hyperactive and agitated over a broad range of lamotrigine dosing (0.7-14.0 mg/kg per d). Five patients developed self-injurious and violent behaviors. Two patients developed severe insomnia. The most affected patient was a 6-year-old boy whose mood and affect became extremely volatile. He also experienced threatening visual and auditory hallucinations and insomnia. All 9 patients had dramatic improvement and/or resolution of the adverse neurobehavioral effects following discontinuation or reduction of lamotrigine. Reversible, severe neurobehavioral disturbances associated with lamotrigine therapy have not been reported in the literature. While idiosyncratic and uncommon, this is a potentially significant, clinical side effect. Further studies are necessary to clarify the population at risk.

Treatment of Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (LGS)

Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) is a severe form of epilepsy that usually starts in early to mid childhood and is characterized by multiple seizure types, abnormal electroencephalogram with slow spike-and-wave discharges and cognitive problems. Numerous approaches are currently used to treat LGS, including use of conventional antiepileptic drugs (most commonly sodium valproate, lamotrigine and topiramate), other drug interventions (corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulin) and nonpharmacologic treatments (ketogenic diet, corpus callosotomy and vagus nerve stimulation). Rufinamide is the most recent antiepileptic drug to have shown efficacy in the treatment of LGS. Despite the variety of therapeutic options, there have been only five double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials of antiepileptic drugs in LGS and none of these were head-to-head comparison trials. The evidence supporting the use of available treatments for LGS is, therefore, not robust. Here, we review the evidence supporting the use of specific therapies in LGS and provide recommendations on how to set appropriate treatment goals, select treatments and minimize polypharmacy. A suggested treatment algorithm is presented and discussed. Sodium valproate is recommended for first-line therapy; if seizures persist, alternative interventions should be trialed on an individually tailored basis.

Efficacy and safety of lamotrigine monotherapy in children and adolescents with epilepsy

Lamotrigine (LTG) has shown to confer broad-spectrum, well-tolerated control of epilepsy. Monotherapy is preferable over polytherapy because of better compliance, fewer adverse events, less interactions, lower teratogenicity and lower cost. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LTG monotherapy on seizure control in a cohort of children and adolescents with epilepsy. We retrospectively reviewed the records of children and adolescents treated with LTG monotherapy at our institution between 2001 and 2006. Data collected included demographics, seizure type, etiology of seizures, age at onset of seizures and at initiation of LTG treatment, number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) prior to LTG, dose of LTG, length of follow-up, treatment response, and adverse events. Seventy-two children and adolescents were identified (mean age 12.1 years); 37.5% had mental retardation. Age at onset of epilepsy was 5.7 years (0-16). Twenty three percent had symptomatic focal epilepsy, 15.5% idiopathic focal epilepsy, 19.4% symptomatic generalized epilepsy and 41.6% idiopathic generalized epilepsy. LTG was used as first-line monotherapy in 26.4% of patients and as a second-line monotherapy in 73.6%. Age at initiation of LTG therapy was 10 years (2.8-19). Mean number of AEDs tried prior to LTG was 1.3 (0-6). Mean dose of LTG was 5.5mg/kg/day (1.1-13.7). Mean follow-up period was 33 months (3 weeks to 11.5 years). The degree of seizure reduction was as follows: seizure free in 42%, 75-90% reduction in 17.4%, 50-74% in 11.6%, 25-49% in 10%. Sixteen percent had no change in seizure control and 3% became worse. The most common adverse event was rash (6.9%). Six (8.3%) patients discontinued LTG because of the adverse events. No patient had Stevens-Johnson syndrome. In conclusion, LTG was effective and well-tolerated as monotherapy in children and adolescents for both focal and generalized epilepsies.

Treatment of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: overview and recent findings

Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is a rare, age-related syndrome, characterized by multiple seizure types, a specific electro-encephalographic pattern, and mental regression. However, published data on the etiology, evolution, and therapeutic approach of LGS are contradictory, partly because the precise definition of LGS used in the literature varies. In the most recent classification, LGS belongs to the epileptic encephalopathies and is highly refractory to all antiepileptic drugs. Numerous treatments, medical and non-medical, have been proposed and results mostly from open studies or case series have been published. Sometimes, patients with LGS are included in a more global group of patients with refractory epilepsy. Only 6 randomized double-blind controlled trials of medical treatments, which included patients with LGS, have been published. Overall, treatment is rarely effective and the final prognosis remains poor in spite of new therapeutic strategies. Co-morbidities need specific treatment. This paper summarizes the definition, diagnosis and therapeutic approach to LGS, including not only recognized antiepileptic drugs, but also "off label" medications, immune therapy, diet, surgery and some perspectives for the future.

Treatment of infantile spasms

BACKGROUND

Infantile spasms (West's Syndrome) is a syndrome which includes a peculiar type of epileptic seizure, the spasms, and an electroencephalogram (EEG) abnormality often called hypsarrhythmia. Psychomotor retardation is frequently found at follow up. Approximately two thirds of affected infants will have a detectable underlying neurological abnormality, but still little is known about the pathophysiological basis for infantile spasms and treatment remains problematic.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of single pharmaceutical therapies used to treat infantile spasms in terms of control of the spasms, resolution of the EEG, relapse rates, psychomotor development, subsequent epilepsy, side effects, and mortality.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Published data: Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 4), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the reference lists of all retrieved articles.Unpublished data: ISRCTN Register (www.controlled-trials.com), correspondence with colleagues and drug companies, and requests at international conferences.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials of the administration of drug therapy to patients with infantile spasms.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data collection from all relevant publications was independently undertaken by three review authors using a standard proforma. Analysis included assessment of study quality and looking for sources of heterogeneity.

MAIN RESULTS

We found 12 small RCTs (less than 60 patients enrolled) and two larger RCT (more than 100 patients enrolled). These 14 studies looked at a total of 681 patients treated with a total of nine different pharmaceutical agents. Overall methodology of the studies was poor, partly because of ethical dilemmas such as giving placebo injections to children. Two studies showed that placebo was not as good as active treatment in resolving the spasms. The strongest evidence suggested that hormonal treatment leads to resolution of spasms faster and in more infants than does vigabatrin. Responses without subsequent relapse may be no different. The same study suggests that hormonal treatments (prednisolone or tetracosactide) might improve the long-term developmental outcome compared with vigabatrin in infants not found to have an underlying cause for their infantile spasms.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

To date, there have been few well-designed RCTs that considered the treatment of infantile spasms, and the numbers of patients enrolled have been small. Overall methodology has been poor, hence it is not clear which treatment is optimal in the treatment of this epilepsy syndrome. Hormonal treatment resolves spasms in more infants than vigabatrin but this may or may not translate into a better long-term outcome. If prednisone or vigabatrin are used then high dosage is recommended. Vigabatrin may be the treatment of choice in tuberous sclerosis. Resolution of the EEG features may be important but this has not been proven. Further research using large studies with robust methodology is still required.

Long-term tolerability and efficacy of lamotrigine in infants 1 to 24 months old

This open-label study was designed to evaluate the long-term tolerability and efficacy of lamotrigine in 1- to 24-month-old infants with partial seizures. The study enrolled both lamotrigine-naïve patients and patients who had been previously exposed to lamotrigine in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients (n = 204) received lamotrigine according to a dosing schedule that depended on prior experience with lamotrigine and concurrent antiepileptic drug therapy for up to 48 weeks or their second birthday, whichever occurred last. Total duration of lamotrigine exposure (which included exposure during the placebo-controlled study in lamotrigine-experienced patients) was >/=24 weeks in 92% of patients, >/=48 weeks in 70% of patients, and >/=72 weeks in 20% of patients. A total of 20 (10%) patients (8 lamotrigine-naïve patients and 12 lamotrigine-experienced patients) transitioned to lamotrigine monotherapy. The most common adverse events were pyrexia (45% of patients), upper-respiratory tract infection (28%), and ear infection (22%). The only adverse event considered reasonably attributable to study medication in >2% of patients was irritability (n = 10; 5% of patients). No cases of serious rash were reported. The median percent reduction from baseline in partial seizure frequency in the sample as a whole was 74%. Seizure frequency was reduced by >/=50% from pre-lamotrigine baseline in 62% of patients in the sample as a whole, 60% of the lamotrigine-naïve subgroup, and 63% of the lamotrigine-experienced subgroup. In the sample as a whole, 13% of patients were seizure free during the Treatment Phase. Investigators considered clinical status at the last clinic visit to be improved (mildly, moderately, or markedly) relative to prelamotrigine clinical status in 76% of patients (150/197) and to be unchanged in 19% (37/197). In this study-the first large prospective investigation of the long-term tolerability and efficacy of an antiepileptic drug in a patient population 2 years and younger-lamotrigine administered for up to approximately 72 weeks was well tolerated and associated with good seizure control.

Role of valproate across the ages. Treatment of epilepsy in children

In June 2005 a team of experts participated in a workshop with the objective of reaching agreement on the place of valproate use in the treatment of paediatric epilepsy patients. A general "consensus of the meeting" was that the initiation of antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment should be based on a seizure-syndromic approach in children. Participants of the meeting also agreed that valproate is currently the AED with the broadest spectrum across all types of seizures and syndromes. Its superiority has been shown over almost 40 years of clinical experience. The best results are seen in idiopathic generalized epilepsy with or without photosensitivity, idiopathic focal and symptomatic generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS). Evidence supports the use of valproate, ethosuximide and lamotrigine in absence epilepsies and the use of carbamazepine, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, phenytoin, topiramate, valproate and phenobarbital for primary GTCS. For new AEDs trials have been undertaken to define their therapeutic role but studies comparing their role to 'old' broad-spectrum drugs in specific syndromes are missing. Experts concluded that intravenous (i.v.) valproate is a useful agent in the treatment of non-convulsive status epilepticus (SE). There is an easy transition to oral treatment following i.v. valproate use. The discussion also concluded that, despite the lack of studies, valproate is an interesting, underutilized alternative in convulsive SE but more controlled studies are needed. The side effects of valproate use are well documented. Its effect on cognition and behaviour is more favourable than many of the other AEDs which is an important consideration in children. Overall, the clinical consensus of the meeting was that valproate's well established therapeutic properties far outweigh the negative side effects. Contraindication or withdrawal should be assessed individually.

Pharmacological treatment of childhood absence epilepsy

This review discusses current pharmacological treatment of childhood absence epilepsy (CAE). The key to successful treatment is the correct diagnosis of the epileptic syndrome, hence the initial part of the paper discusses the definition, diagnostic criteria and epidemiology. This is followed by a detailed analysis of pharmacological agents used in the treatment of CAE. The characteristics of old and new anticonvulsants used in the treatment of CAE are also reviewed. For each of the drugs, the mechanism of action, usual dose, common side effects and recommendations for treatment are also discussed. A separate section focuses on instances when anticonvulsants may exacerbate seizures. Particular emphasis is given to the evidence currently available, on which clinical practice needs to be based.

Long-term profile of lamotrigine in 119 children with epilepsy

Lamotrigine (LTG) was reported to have a positive profile especially regarding cognition. Our investigation focuses on whether the experiences of physicians and parents of children with long-term LTG treatment confirm this. All patients of two neuropaediatric departments in whose treatment course LTG had been administered, irrespective of the outcome of the therapy had been included in this study. By conducting semi-structured interviews with patients' parents and epileptologists, we collected qualitative epidemiological and epilepsy related data on seizure rate, adverse events and assessed changes of cognition and vigilance of LTG therapy on 119 patients. Each of the patients had been in the constant and continuous care of one and the same experienced epileptologist over the completeobservational period. Seizure control was more than 50% seizure reduction in 46% of the patients and is herewith comparable to that of other newer antiepileptic drugs. In the majority of patients, physicians and parents rated the patients' cognition and vigilance as unchanged during therapy. If changes were reported, these were more likely positive than negative for the patient and most prominent in concentration and vigilance. Parents' ratings were comparable to physicians' view. Results of earlier reports of a favorable cognitive profile of LTG seem to reach relevance in the long-term treatment of childhood epilepsies, as the neutral to beneficial effects of LTG on cognition and vigilance in long-term treatment is confirmed by physicians' and parents' experience. Our qualitative evaluation is supporting LTG as an anticonvulsive drug with a profile suitable for the use in children.

[Therapies for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome]

The treatment of Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) has been improved with the introduction of the new anti-epileptic drugs: lamotrigine and topiramate, the employment of a ketogenic diet, and the availability of vagal nerve stimulation. It is difficult to provide recommendations for the treatment of LGS, in the absence of comparative trials. However, suggestions can be made on the basis of the best evidence available. Treatment should commence with valproate and continue with lamotrigine or topiramate. If seizure control is not sufficient, felbamate, a ketogenic diet, and vagal nerve stimulation are recommended. A partial callosotomy may be performed for the treatment of frequent drop attacks. Other anti-epileptic drugs may be used after a risks-benefits evaluation.

The LAM-SAFE Study: Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine or valproic acid in newly diagnosed focal and generalised epilepsies in adolescents and adults

OBJECTIVE

To investigate efficacy and safety of lamotrigine (LTG) versus carbamazepine (CBZ) or valproic acid (VPA) in newly diagnosed focal (FE) and idiopathic generalised (GE) epilepsies in adolescents and adults.

METHODS

Open-label randomised comparative multicentre 24-week monotherapy trial in newly diagnosed epilepsy patients of >or=12 years of age. Patients with FE were treated with LTG or CBZ, those with GE received LTG or VPA. The primary efficacy variable was the number of seizure-free patients during study weeks 17 and 24.

RESULTS

Two hundred and thirty-nine patients were included. One hundred and seventy-six patients suffered from FE and 63 from GE. In the FE group, 88 patients each were treated with CBZ or LTG. Ninety-four percent of the CBZ patients and 89% of the LTG patients became seizure-free according to an intent-to-treat analysis (not statistically different). The rate of patients discontinuing treatment due to adverse events or a lack of efficacy was 19% with CBZ compared to 9% with LTG (not statistically different). In the GE group, 30 patients received VPA and 33 LTG. During study weeks 17 and 24, 61% of the LTG patients and 84% of the VPA patients had become seizure-free (not statistically significant). The drop-out rate due to lack of efficacy or adverse events was 12% with LTG and 3% with VPA (not statistically different).

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that the effectiveness of LTG in focal and generalised epilepsy syndromes as initial monotherapy in patients >or=12 years is in the range of standard first-line antiepileptic drugs.

Ethosuximide, sodium valproate or lamotrigine for absence seizures in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

Absence seizures are brief epileptic seizures which present in childhood and adolescence. They are characterised by sudden loss of awareness and an electroencephalogram (EEG) typically shows generalised spike wave discharges at three cycles per second. Ethosuximide, valproate and lamotrigine are currently used to treat absence seizures. This review aims to determine the best choice of anticonvulsant for a child with typical absence seizures.

OBJECTIVES

To review the evidence for the effects of ethosuximide, valproate and lamotrigine as treatments for children and adolescents with absence seizures, when compared with placebo or each other.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group's Specialised Register (March 2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to March 2005) and EMBASE (1988 to March 2005). No language restrictions were imposed. In addition, we contacted Sanofi Winthrop, Glaxo Wellcome (now GlaxoSmithKline) and Parke Davis (now Pfizer), manufacturers of sodium valproate, lamotrigine and ethosuximide respectively.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised parallel group monotherapy or add-on trials which include a comparison of any of the following in children or adolescents with absence seizures: ethosuximide; sodium valproate; lamotrigine or placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Outcome measures were: (1) proportion of individuals seizure free at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months post randomisation; (2) people with a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency; (3) normalisation of EEG and/or negative hyperventilation test and (4) adverse effects. Data were independently extracted by two review authors. Results are presented as relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Five small trials were found, four of them were of poor methodological quality. One trial (29 participants) compared lamotrigine with placebo using a response conditional design. Individuals taking lamotrigine were significantly more likely to be seizure free than participants taking placebo during this short trial. Another trial compared lamotrigine with sodium valproate, the study lacked power to detect the difference in efficacy. Three studies compared ethosuximide, but because of diverse study designs and populations studied, we decided not to pool results in a meta-analysis. None of these studies found a difference between valproate and ethosuximide with respect to seizure control, but confidence intervals were wide and the existence of important differences could not be excluded.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Although ethosuximide, lamotrigine and valproate are commonly used to treat people with absence seizures we have insufficient evidence to inform clinical practice, and the few trials included in this review were of poor methodological quality and did not have sufficient number of participants. More trials of better quality are needed.

The use of lamotrigine and other antiepileptic drugs in paediatric patients at a Malaysian hospital

OBJECTIVE

(1) To determine the effect of lamotrigine add-on therapy on the seizure frequency and cost in paediatric patients. (2) To determine the prescribing pattern of other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).

METHOD

A retrospective study of medical records was carried out from October 2000 to June 2001 at the paediatric clinic, Hospital Pulau Pinang.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Seizure frequency, cost of drug and types of AED prescribed.

RESULTS

A total of 209 medical records were retrieved during the study period. Lamotrigine (LTG) was prescribed in 29 patients as add-on therapy. In 18 patients, there was a significant reduction in seizure frequency after the addition of LTG. Approximately 70% experienced a reduction in seizure frequency of more than 50%. Side effects of LTG were considered mild and manageable. However, drug cost after the addition of LTG increased by 103%. In the remaining 180 patients, the most common AED prescribed was sodium valproate (VPA). Only 15% of the patients received combination therapy. Mean monthly cost of monotherapy was found to be RM 24.4 while monthly cost of combination therapy was RM 45.4 (1 Euro-RM 5.00).

CONCLUSION

The majority of paediatric patients in the study are on AED monotherapy and only a small percentage was prescribed lamotrigine. The use of lamotrigine is associated with better seizure control but with an increase in drug cost.

Adverse reactions of Topiramate and Lamotrigine in children

PURPOSE

To review the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of Topiramate and Lamotrigine among children in Israel, and to compare the two drugs, based on their side effect profile and tolerability among this population.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study. Four paediatric neurologists from three different tertiary medical centres in Israel documented all cases of children from birth to the age 18 years, treated with Topiramate and/or Lamotrigine in their respective outpatient clinics and hospital wards. All present ADRs and their characteristics were recorded.

RESULTS

Reports on 45 and 65 children treated with Topiramate and Lamotrigine respectively, were received. Half of the children treated with Topiramate suffered from one or more ADRs, as opposed to one-third of the children treated with Lamotrigine (p = 0.03). Most reactions were considered mild to moderate. There were no deaths or hospitalisations, but the drug had to be discontinued in about 10% of the patients due to ADRs. Most Topiramate and Lamotrigine ADRs appeared early in the treatment and were more frequent when Topiramate was an add-on versus a monotherapy drug. Most ADRs of both Topiramate and Lamotrigine were related to the central nervous system; while poor appetite, drowsiness, speech difficulties and weight loss were observed only with Topiramate, and rash and headaches only with Lamotrigine. Nervousness and seizure aggravation were more frequent ADRs of Topiramate whereas sleep disturbances were observed more in children treated with Lamotrigine.

CONCLUSION

Results of this study indicate that Lamotrigine causes ADRs less frequently than Topiramate; however both medications are generally well tolerated. Topiramate and Lamotrigine differ in their central nervous system side effect profile.

Lamotrigine versus valproic acid as first-line monotherapy in newly diagnosed typical absence seizures: an open-label, randomized, parallel-group study

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of lamotrigine (LTG) and valproic acid (VPA) in newly diagnosed children and adolescents with typical absence seizures.

METHODS

A randomized, open-label parallel-group design was used. After undergoing an awake video-EEG recording, which included one to two trials of 3 min of hyperventilation and intermittent photic stimulation, eligible patients were randomized to receive LTG or VPA. LTG was initiated at a daily dose of 0.5 mg/kg for 2 weeks in two divided doses, followed by 1.0 mg/kg/day for an additional 2 weeks. Thereafter, doses were increased in 1-mg/kg/day increments every 5 days until seizures were controlled, intolerable adverse effects occurred, or a maximum dose of 12 mg/kg/day had been reached. VPA was equally uptitrated according to clinical response, starting at 10 mg/kg and increasing by 5 mg/kg/24 h every 3 days, if required, to a maximum of 30 mg/kg/day in three divided doses. Patients were seen in the clinic every month for < or = 12 months. The primary efficacy end point at each visit was seizure freedom, defined as lack of clinically observed seizures since the previous visit and lack of electroclinical seizures during ambulatory 24-h EEG testing and a video-EEG session with hyperventilation.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight children (17 boys, 21 girls), aged from 3 to 13 years (mean, 7.5 years), all newly diagnosed with childhood or juvenile typical absence seizures, were enrolled. After 1 month of treatment, 10 (52.6%) of 19 children taking VPA and one (5.3%) of 19 taking LTG were seizure free (p = 0.004). By the 3-month follow-up, 12 (63.1%) children taking VPA and seven (36.8%) taking LTG were controlled (p = 0.19). After 12 months, 13 children taking VPA (dose range, 20-30 mg/kg/day; mean serum level, 76.8 mg/L; range, 51.4-91 mg/L) and 10 taking LTG (dose range, 2-11 mg/kg/day; mean serum level, 8.1 mg/L; range, 1.1-18 mg/L) were seizure free (p = 0.51). Side effects were mostly mild and transient and were recorded in two (10.6%) children treated with VPA and in six (31.8%) treated with LTG.

CONCLUSIONS

Both VPA and LTG can be efficacious against absence seizures, although VPA shows a much faster onset of action, at least in part because of its shorter titration schedule.

Treatment of partial seizures in childhood : an overview

The treatment of partial seizures in children is based on the use of first generation and recently introduced antiepileptic drugs as well as nonpharmacological treatments such as the ketogenic diet, vagus nerve stimulation and surgical therapy. The present review discusses the efficacy and tolerability of different treatment options for partial seizures in childhood. Few adjunctive or monotherapy, placebo-controlled or comparative trials of the first-generation antiepileptic drugs and some of the more recently introduced antiepileptic drugs have been performed in children. This can be explained by the fact that it is only relatively recently (1989) that the International League against Epilepsy proposed that randomised, controlled trials be included among the required criteria for assessing the efficacy and tolerability of an antiepileptic agent. This led to controlled, comparative trials among older antiepileptic drugs (phenobarbital, phenytoin, carbamazepine and valproic acid), both in adults and in paediatric patients, being performed relatively 'late', based on when these drugs were first introduced. Carbamazepine and valproic acid may still be considered as first-line antiepileptic therapies for children with partial seizures. Phenobarbital and phenytoin are mostly considered as last choice drugs because of their adverse event profiles. The new generation of antiepileptic agents has added to the first- and second-line treatment options for paediatric partial seizures. To date, there are sufficient data to support the clinical use of some of the recently introduced antiepileptic drugs (e.g. oxcarbazepine, topiramate, gabapentin and lamotrigine) as adjunctive or first-line monotherapy. Because of the risk of visual field constriction with vigabatrin, the use of this drug is currently limited to patients refractory to other medications. Tiagabine, felbamate, levetiracetam and zonisamide have been shown to be effective in adults with partial seizures; however, at present there are not yet enough data on the efficacy of these drugs in children to support consideration of their use as either first-line or add-on therapy in this patient population, although controlled studies are expected shortly. Furthermore, the use of felbamate is considerably limited by rare, but severe, hepatic and haematological toxicity. Controlled trials for paediatric partial seizures are still lacking for the ketogenic diet and vagus nerve stimulation, though they may represent, in given patients, useful adjunctive alternative treatments for refractory partial seizures. In conclusion, further trials are needed to determine an optimal sequence of first- and second-line therapies and to establish whether other newer antiepileptic drugs merit consideration as initial therapy in children with partial seizures.

Lamotrigine as first-line drug in childhood absence epilepsy: a clinical and neurophysiological study

To investigate to which extent lamotrigine (LTG) may be effective and tolerated as a monotherapy for the treatment of newly diagnosed childhood absence seizures and, secondly, to evaluate the efficacy of this drug on the circadian interictal generalized epileptiform discharges, 20 consecutive newly diagnosed patients (five males, 15 females), aged 3-10 years (mean 6.9 years), affected by childhood absence epilepsy, were administered LTG as first-line drug at the initial dose of 0.5 mg/kg/day for 2 weeks, followed by 1.0 mg/kg/day for an additional 2 weeks. Thereafter, doses have been increased in 1-mg/kg/day increments up to 9-12 mg/kg/day in accordance with the clinical response. Each patient underwent an ambulatory (24 h) EEG monitoring before starting LTG therapy (time 0) and during the maintenance period at the end of LTG titration (time 1). After a mean follow-up period of 10.8 months (range 3-28 months), a 100% seizure control was obtained in 11 children (55.5%), a more than 75% seizure decrease was present in four (20%), and a >50% seizure decrease in five (25%), with a mean LTG dose of 6.2 mg/kg/day (range 1.2-11) in the controlled group. Adverse events were present in three patients (15%); they were generally mild and transient. Our series confirms that LTG monotherapy may control typical childhood absence seizures in about half the children as well as it may decrease interictal generalized spike and wave discharges both in seizure-free and uncontrolled patients. The slow titration phase of the drug due to the risk of the skin rash may eventually reduce compliance.

Clinical trials for treatment of primary generalized epilepsies

PURPOSE

To review the current state of knowledge of the treatment of primary (idiopathic) generalized epilepsy syndromes based on the efficacy results of clinical trials, to highlight obstacles in the design of these trials, and to suggest solutions for future research.

METHODS

Published reports of controlled clinical trials, as well as large or significant uncontrolled trials of treatments for these syndromes, were reviewed. Trials were selected for discussion based on their importance or their illustration of design issues.

RESULTS

Only a few randomized, controlled trials of therapy for these syndromes exist. Conclusions based on this Class I data include efficacy in absence epilepsies for ethosuximide, valproate, and lamotrigine, and for eight drugs for primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Many commonly accepted therapeutic strategies are not based on formal data. No controlled data exist for uncommon syndromes.

CONCLUSIONS

More clinical trials of therapies for primary generalized epilepsies are needed. To overcome design obstacles, better funding, multicenter cooperation, inclusion of children, study designs requiring fewer patients, equivalent-control designs, use of EEG and video seizure counting, and better syndrome identification will be required.

Treatment Strategies for Myoclonic Seizures and Epilepsy Syndromes with Myoclonic Seizures

Despite the availability of numerous treatment options, the diagnosis and treatment of myoclonic seizures continue to be challenging. Based on clinical experience, valproate and benzodiazepines have historically been used to treat myoclonic seizures. However, many more treatment options exist today, and the clinician must match the appropriate treatment with the patient's epilepsy syndrome and its underlying etiology. Comorbidities and other medications must also be considered when making decisions regarding treatment. Rarely, some antiepileptic drugs may exacerbate myoclonic seizures. Most epileptic myoclonus can be treated pharmacologically, but some cases respond better to surgery, the ketogenic diet, or vagus nerve stimulation. Because myoclonic seizures can be difficult to treat, clinicians should be flexible in their approach and tailor therapy to each patient.

The effect of lamotrigine on the EEGs of children and adolescents with epilepsy

Lamotrigine (LTG) is one of the newer-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) with broad-spectrum efficacy against a variety of seizures and epileptic syndromes. We retrospectively evaluated the effects of LTG as add-on therapy on EEGs of children and adolescents. The EEGs of 53 patients (mean age: 12.5 years) with primarily pharmacoresistant epilepsy were reviewed prior to and after LTG add-on therapy. Multiple seizure types were seen in 25, generalized seizures in 15, and complex partial seizures in 13 of the patients. Preceding LTG therapy, the baseline EEG was abnormal because of slow background in 60.3% and localized spikes in 35.8%, generalized spikes in 28.3%, or both in 24.5%. The EEG analysis during the 2-year follow-up period showed improvement in the background in 21.9%, interictal activity in 37.8%, and ictal pattern in 41.1% of the EEG recordings. Overall, LTG resulted in improvement in electrographic features which paralleled the clinical improvement.

Lamotrigine as adjunctive therapy in patients with refractory epilepsy and mental retardation

This study evaluated the effects of lamotrigine as adjunctive therapy for refractory epilepsy in patients with mental retardation. Patients with epilepsy and mental retardation having uncontrolled seizures despite treatment with other antiepileptic drugs were eligible (n=67). The open-label study comprised a Baseline Phase, an Escalation Phase during which lamotrigine was titrated to a target dose, an 8-week Maintenance Phase during which doses of lamotrigine and concomitant antiepileptic drugs were maintained, and a 12-week Optimization Phase during which doses of lamotrigine and other antiepileptic drugs could be adjusted. Almost half (44%) of patients experienced a 50% reduction in seizure frequency during the Maintenance Phase after addition of lamotrigine; 15% of patients became seizure-free. A similar pattern of results was reported for the Optimization Phase. Investigator-rated clinical status was improved relative to baseline in 66 and 74% of patients at the end of the Maintenance and Optimization Phases, respectively. Most patients experienced improvements in seizure frequency, duration, and intensity during the Maintenance Phase (62 to 72%) and the Optimization Phase (65 to 74%). Many patients were rated as having improved social functioning during the Maintenance Phase (42%) and the Optimization Phase (46%). The Aberrant Behavior Checklist score for lethargy and the mean Habilitative Improvement Scale score were improved at the ends of the Maintenance and Optimization Phases relative to baseline (P< or =0.04). One limitation of this study is its open-label design, which limits the ability definitively to attribute the clinical improvements to lamotrigine. Adjunctive lamotrigine in patients with refractory epilepsy and mental retardation appears to decrease seizure frequency and improve behavior while permitting a reduction in dose of concomitant antiepileptic drugs.

Ethosuximide, sodium valproate or lamotrigine for absence seizures in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

Absence seizures are brief epileptic seizures which present in childhood and adolescence. They are characterised by sudden loss of awareness and an electroencephalogram (EEG) typically shows generalised spike wave discharges at three cycles per second. Ethosuximide, valproate and lamotrigine are currently used to treat absence seizures. This review aims to determine the best choice of anticonvulsant for a child with typical absence seizures.

OBJECTIVES

To review the evidence for the effects of ethosuximide, valproate and lamotrigine as treatments for children and adolescents with absence seizures, when compared with placebo or each other.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group trials register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library issue 1, 2003), MEDLINE (January 1966 to March 2003) and EMBASE (1988 to March 2003). We also contacted Sanofi Winthrop, Glaxo Wellcome (now GlaxoSmithKline) and Parke Davis (now Pfizer), manufacturers of sodium valproate, lamotrigine and ethosuximide respectively.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised parallel group monotherapy or add-on trials which include a comparison of any of the following in children or adolescents with absence seizures: ethosuximide; sodium valproate; lamotrigine or placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Outcome measures were: (i) proportion of individuals seizure free at 1, 6 and 18 months post randomisation; (ii) people with a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency; (iii) normalisation of EEG and/or negative hyperventilation test and (iv) adverse effects. Data were independently extracted by two reviewers. Results are presented as relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Four small trials were found, which were of poor methodological quality. One trial (29 participants) compared lamotrigine with placebo using a response conditional design. Individuals taking lamotrigine were significantly more likely to be seizure free than participants taking placebo during this short trial. Three studies compared ethosuximide, but because of diverse study designs and populations studied, we decided not to pool results in a meta-analysis. None of these studies found a difference between valproate and ethosuximide with respect to seizure control, but confidence intervals were wide and the existence of important differences could not be excluded.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Although ethosuximide, lamotrigine and valproate are commonly used to treat people with absence seizures we have insufficient evidence to inform clinical practice, and the few trials included in this review were of poor methodological quality. More trials of better quality are needed.