Differing patterns of antiresorptive pharmacotherapy in nursing facility residents and community dwellers

Biofunctional soyasaponin Bb in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) sprouts enhances bone morphogenetic protein-2-dependent osteogenic differentiation via activation of runt-related transcription factor 2 in C2C12 cells

Improvement of bone formation is necessary for successful treatment of the bone defects associated with osteoporosis. In this study, we sought to elucidate the osteogenic activity of peanut sprouts and their bioactive components. We found that peanut sprout water extract (PSWE) enhanced bone morphogenetic protein‐2‐mediated osteoblast differentiation in a dose‐dependent manner by stimulating expression of runt‐related transcription factor 2 (Runx2) via activation of AKT/MAP kinases. We identified a major component of PSWE, soyasaponin Bb, as the bioactive compound responsible for improvement of anabolic activity. Soyasaponin Bb from PSWE enhanced expression of the osteogenic transcription factor Runx2 and alkaline phosphatase. The soyasaponin Bb content depended on sprouting time of peanut, and the anabolic action of PSWE was dependent on soyasaponin Bb content. Thus, PSWE and soyasaponin Bb have the potential to protect against bone disorders, including osteoporosis.

Validation of a one year fracture prediction tool for absolute hip fracture risk in long term care residents

BACKGROUND

Frail older adults living in long term care (LTC) homes have a high fracture risk, which can result in reduced quality of life, pain and death. The Fracture Risk Scale (FRS) was designed for fracture risk assessment in LTC, to optimize targeting of services in those at highest risk. This study aims to examine the construct validity and discriminative properties of the FRS in three Canadian provinces at 1-year follow up.

METHODS

LTC residents were included if they were: 1) Adults admitted to LTC homes in Ontario (ON), British Columbia (BC) and Manitoba (MB) Canada; and 2) Received a Resident Assessment Instrument Minimum Data Set Version 2.0. After admission to LTC, one-year hip fracture risk was evaluated for all the included residents using the FRS (an eight-level risk scale, level 8 represents the highest fracture risk). Multiple logistic regressions were used to determine the differences in incident hip or all clinical fractures across the provinces and FRS risk levels. We examined the differences in incident hip or all clinical fracture for each FRS level across the three provinces (adjusted for age, BMI, gender, fallers and previous fractures). We used the C-statistic to assess the discriminative properties of the FRS for each province.

RESULTS

Descriptive statistics on the LTC populations in ON (n = 29,848), BC (n = 3129), and MB (n = 2293) are: mean (SD) age 82 (10), 83 (10), and 84 (9), gender (female %) 66, 64, and 70% respectively. The incident hip fractures and all clinical fractures for FRS risk level were similar among the three provinces and ranged from 0.5 to 19.2% and 1 to 19.2% respectively. The overall discriminative properties of the FRS were similar between ON (C-statistic = 0.673), BC (C-statistic = 0.644) and MB (C-statistic = 0.649) samples.

CONCLUSION

FRS is a valid tool for identifying LTC residents at different risk levels for hip or all clinical fractures in three provinces. Having a fracture risk assessment tool that is tailored to the LTC context and embedded within the routine clinical assessment may have significant implications for policy, service delivery and care planning, and may improve care for LTC residents across Canada.

Development and validation of the Fracture Risk Scale (FRS) that predicts fracture over a 1-year time period in institutionalised frail older people living in Canada: an electronic record-linked longitudinal cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To develop and validate our Fracture Risk Scale (FRS) over a 1-year time period, using the long-term care (LTC) Resident Assessment Instrument Minimum Data Set Version 2.0 (RAI-MDS 2.0).

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

LTC homes in Ontario, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

Older adults who were admitted to LTC and received a RAI-MDS 2.0 admission assessment between 2006 and 2010.

RESULTS

A total of 29 848 LTC residents were enrolled in the study. Of these 22 386 were included in the derivation dataset and 7462 individual were included in the validation dataset. Approximately 2/3 of the entire sample were women and 45% were 85 years of age or older. A total of 1553 (5.2%) fractures were reported over the 1-year time period. Of these, 959 (61.8%) were hip fractures. Following a hip fracture, 6.3% of individuals died in the emergency department or as an inpatient admission and did not return to their LTC home. Using decision tree analysis, our final outcome scale had eight risk levels of differentiation. The percentage of individuals with a hip fracture ranged from 0.6% (lowest risk level) to 12.6% (highest risk level). The area under the curve of the outcome scale was similar for the derivation (0.67) and validation (0.69) samples, and the scale exhibited a good level of consistency.

CONCLUSIONS

Our FRS predicts hip fracture over a 1-year time period and should be used as an aid to support clinical decisions in the care planning of LTC residents. Future research should focus on the transformation of our scale to a Clinical Assessment Protocol and to assess the FRS in other healthcare settings.

Incidence and Duration of Cumulative Bisphosphonate Use among Community-Dwelling Persons with or without Alzheimer's Disease

We studied the incidence and duration of cumulative bisphosphonate use among older Finnish women and men with or without Alzheimer's disease (AD). The MEDALZ-2005 cohort is a nationwide sample of all persons with clinically diagnosed AD on 31 December 2005 and their age-, gender-, and region of residence-matched control persons without AD. Information on bisphosphonate use by persons with an AD diagnosis and their controls without AD during 2002-2009 was obtained from the prescription register database containing reimbursed medications. A total of 6,041 (11.8%) persons used bisphosphonates during the 8-year follow-up. Bisphosphonates were more commonly used among persons without AD (n = 3121, 12.3%) than among persons with AD (n = 2,920, 11.2%) (p = 0.001). The median duration of bisphosphonate use was 743 days (IQR). Among persons with AD, the median duration of use was 777 days (IQR) and among persons without AD, 701 days (IQR) (p = 0.011). People without AD more often used bisphosphonate combination preparations including vitamin D than did people with AD (p <  0.0001). Bisphosphonate use was more common among people without AD who had comorbidities, asthma/COPD, or rheumatoid arthritis compared with users with AD. Short-term users were more likely to be male, at least 80 years old, and not having AD. Although the incidence of bisphosphonate use was slightly higher among persons without AD, the cumulative duration of bisphosphonate use was longer in persons with AD. Short-term use was associated with male gender, older age, and not having AD.

Factors associated with receiving anti-osteoporosis treatment among older persons with minimal trauma hip fracture presenting to an acute orthogeriatric service

BACKGROUND/AIM

The aim of this study was to investigate factors that were associated with receiving anti-osteoporosis treatment (AOT) among patients with minimal trauma hip fracture admitted to an Australian tertiary trauma centre under the Acute Orthogeriatric Service (AOS) over a 6 month period.

DESIGN

Observational study using prospectively collected data.

METHODS

Demographic and clinical characteristics of 211 patients were extracted from the local hip fracture registry and electronic medical records. The outcome measure was receipt of AOT before separation from the AOS. Binary logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with treatment.

RESULTS

91 (45%) patients received AOT, including 51 (25.2%) treatment-naive patients. Factors significantly associated with receiving treatment included higher serum vitamin D level (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.23-1.70, p<0.001) and trochanteric vs. cervical fracture (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.30-5.49, p=0.007). Living in a residential aged care facility (RACF) prior to the index fracture (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.08-0.54, p=0.001) and higher American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.25-0.98, p=0.04) significantly lowered the likelihood of treatment. Age, gender, cognitive impairment, premorbid walking ability, previous fragility fracture and renal impairment did not correlate with treatment.

CONCLUSION

A significant proportion (55%) of hip fracture patients did not receive AOT in hospital. The probability of receiving treatment appears to be significantly associated with serum vitamin D level, fracture type, place of residence and comorbidity burden.

Treatment of Osteoporosis in Australian Residential Aged Care Facilities: Update on Consensus Recommendations for Fracture Prevention

BACKGROUND

Older people living in residential aged care facilities (RACFs) are at a higher risk of suffering fractures than the community-dwelling older population. The first Consensus Conference on Treatment of Osteoporosis in RACFs in Australia, held in Sydney in July 2009, aimed to address some of the issues relating to the treatment of older residents with osteoporosis in RACFs. Considering that the field of osteoporosis diagnosis and management has significantly advanced in the last 5 years and that new evidence has been generated from studies performed within RACFs, a Second Consensus Conference was held in Sydney in November 2014.

METHODS

An expert panel met in November 2014 in Penrith, NSW, Australia in an attempt to reach a consensus on diverse issues related to the treatment of osteoporosis at RACFs. Participants were selected by the scientific committee on the basis of their practice in an RACF and/or major published articles. The co-chairs distributed topics randomly to all participants, who then had to propose a statement on each topic for approval by the conference after a short, evidence-based presentation, when possible.

RESULTS

This article provides an update on the most relevant evidence on osteoporosis in older people living in RACFs graded according to its level, quality, and relevance.

CONCLUSION

As with the first consensus, it is hoped that this statement will constitute an important guide to aid physicians in their decision making while practicing at RACFs.

Comparative trends in incident fracture rates for all long-term care and community-dwelling seniors in Ontario, Canada, 2002-2012

SUMMARY

In this population-based study, we compared incident fracture rates in long-term care (LTC) versus community seniors between 2002 and 2012. Hip fracture rates declined more rapidly in LTC than in the community. An excess burden of fractures occurred in LTC for hip, pelvis, and humerus fractures in men and hip fractures only in women.

INTRODUCTION

This study compares trends in incident fracture rates between long-term care (LTC) and community-dwelling seniors ≥65 years, 2002-2012.

METHODS

This is a population-based cohort study using administrative data. Measurements were age/sex-adjusted incident fracture rates and rate ratios (RR) and annual percent change (APC).

RESULTS

Over 11 years, hip fracture rates had a marked decline occurring more rapidly in LTC (APC, -3.49 (95% confidence interval (CI), -3.97, -3.01)) compared with the community (APC, -2.93 (95% CI, -3.28, -2.57); p < 0.05 for difference in slopes). Humerus and wrist fracture rates decreased; however, an opposite trend occurred for pelvis and spine fractures with rates increasing over time in both cohorts (all APCs, p < 0.05). In 2012, incident hip fracture rates were higher in LTC than the community (RRs: women, 1.55 (95% CI, 1.45, 1.67); men, 2.18 (95% CI, 1.93, 2.47)). Higher rates of pelvis (RR, 1.48 (95% CI, 1.22, 1.80)) and humerus (RR, 1.40 (95% CI, 1.07, 1.84)) fractures were observed in LTC men, not women. In women, wrist (RR, 0.76 (95% CI, 0.71, 0.81)) and spine (RR, 0.52 (95% CI, 0.45, 0.61)) fracture rates were lower in LTC than the community; in men, spine (RR, 0.75 (95% CI, 0.57, 0.98) but not wrist fracture (RR, 0.91 (95% CI, 0.67, 1.23)) rates were significantly lower in LTC than the community.

CONCLUSION

Previous studies in the community have shown declining hip fracture rates over time, also demonstrated in our study but at a more rapid rate in LTC. Rates of humerus and wrist fractures also declined. An excess burden of fractures in LTC occurred for hip fractures in women and for hip, pelvis, and humerus fractures in men.

Osteoporosis prescribing in long-term care: impact of a provincial knowledge translation strategy

This study described prescribing trends before and after implementing a provincial strategy aimed at improving osteoporosis and fracture prevention in Ontario long-term care (LTC) homes. Data were obtained from a pharmacy provider for 10 LTC homes in 2007 and 166 homes in 2012. We used weighted, multiple linear regression analyses to examine facility-level changes in vitamin D, calcium, and osteoporosis medication prescribing rates between 2007 and 2012. After five years, the estimated increase in vitamin D, calcium, and osteoporosis medication prescribing rates, respectively, was 38.2 per cent (95% confidence interval [CI]: 29.0, 47.3; p < .001), 4.0 per cent (95% CI: -3.9, 12.0; p = .318), and 0.2 per cent (95% CI: -3.3, 3.7; p = .91). Although the study could not assess causality, findings suggest that wide-scale knowledge translation activities successfully improved vitamin D prescribing rates, although ongoing efforts are needed to target homes with low uptake.

Effects of health insurance on racial disparity in osteoporosis medication adherence

OBJECTIVE

To explore whether racial disparity in osteoporosis drug therapy maintenance varies by health insurance coverage status.

DESIGN

Longitudinal observation study.

SETTING

Cleveland Clinic Health System (Cleveland, OH) from January 2006 to December 2009.

PATIENTS

3,901 black and white female Medicare beneficiaries starting osteoporosis drug therapy.

INTERVENTION

Analysis of the health system's integrated electronic medical records.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Drug therapy adherence (medication possession ratio ≥80%) for more than 12 of 15 surveillance units and occurrence of extended nonadherence gaps for at least two surveillance units in a row.

RESULTS

Among patients with supplementary health insurance (n = 2,278), no difference was observed for drug therapy adherence ( P = 0.17) and extended nonadherence gaps ( P = 0.53) between black and white participants. When patients did not have supplementary health insurance (n = 1,623), blacks (36% [95% CI 28-47]) were less likely to adhere to drug therapy than whites (47% [38-57]; odds ratio [OR] 0.34 [95% CI 0.09-0.92], P = 0.004). Blacks (25% [19-32]) also were more likely to have an extended nonadherence gap episode than whites (18% [11-26]; OR 2.42 [1.13-3.50], P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Similar to previous research on racial disparity in health services, racial disparity in osteoporosis drug therapy maintenance between black and white female older patients existed when supplementary health insurance was not affordable.

Prevalence of vertebral fracture in oldest old nursing home residents

We evaluated vertebral fracture prevalence using DXA-based vertebral fracture assessment and its influence on the Fracture Risk Assessment (FRAX) tool-determined 10-year fracture probability in a cohort of oldest old nursing home residents. More than one third of the subjects had prevalent vertebral fracture and 50% osteoporosis. Probably in relation with the prevailing influence of age and medical history of fracture, adding these information into FRAX did not markedly modify fracture probability.

INTRODUCTION

Oldest old nursing home residents are at very high risk of fracture. The prevalence of vertebral fracture in this specific population and its influence on fracture probability using the FRAX tool are not known.

METHODS

Using a mobile DXA osteodensitometer, we studied the prevalence of vertebral fracture, as assessed by vertebral fracture assessment program, of osteoporosis and of sarcopenia in 151 nursing home residents. Ten-year fracture probability was calculated using appropriately calibrated FRAX tool.

RESULTS

Vertebral fractures were detected in 36% of oldest old nursing home residents (mean age, 85.9 ± 0.6 years). The prevalence of osteoporosis and sarcopenia was 52% and 22%, respectively. Ten-year fracture probability as assessed by FRAX tool was 27% and 15% for major fracture and hip fracture, respectively. Adding BMD or VFA values did not significantly modify it.

CONCLUSION

In oldest old nursing home residents, osteoporosis and vertebral fracture were frequently detected. Ten-year fracture probability appeared to be mainly determined by age and clinical risk factors obtained by medical history, rather than by BMD or vertebral fracture.

Undertreatment of osteoporosis in persons with dementia? A population-based study

In this population-based study of more than 2,600 elderly, people with dementia received less preventive treatment for osteoporosis compared to people without dementia, although osteoporotic fractures were more common in patients with dementia. Thus, our results indicate an undertreatment of osteoporosis in dementia.

INTRODUCTION

This study compares the use of osteoporosis drugs in elderly with and without dementia, taking into account osteoporotic fractures and type of housing.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the baseline examination (2001-2004) of The Swedish National Study on Aging and Care- Kungsholmen (SNAC-K), Stockholm, Sweden. Participants were aged ≥ 66 years (n = 2610). We analysed the use of bisphosphonates, raloxifene, and calcium/vitamin D combinations in relation to clinically based dementia diagnosis. Information about osteoporotic fractures during the previous 4 years was obtained from the Swedish National Patient Register. We used logistic regression to analyze the association between dementia status and use of osteoporosis drugs.

RESULTS

Osteoporosis drugs (mainly calcium/vitamin D combinations) were used by 5% of the persons with dementia and 12% of the persons without dementia. Furthermore, 25% of the persons with dementia and 7% of the persons without dementia had had at least one osteoporotic fracture during the past 4 years. After controlling for age, sex, osteoporotic fractures, and type of housing (own home or institution), persons with dementia were less likely to use osteoporosis drugs than persons without dementia (OR = 0.34; 95% CI, 0.19-0.59).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate an undertreatment of osteoporosis in persons with dementia, although osteoporotic fractures are common among these patients.

FRAX or fiction: determining optimal screening strategies for treatment of osteoporosis in residents in long-term care facilities

OBJECTIVES

To examine screening strategies for osteoporosis and fractures for treatment of long-term care residents.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis to examine screening strategies for treatment.

SETTING

Assisted living and skilled care facilities.

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred two frail women aged 65 and older (mean 85), excluding those receiving bisphosphonates.

MEASUREMENTS

Clinical fractures of the hip or spine (Clin Fx); Clin Fx or bone mineral density (BMD); Clin Fx, BMD, or vertebral fractures (VF) assessed according to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-based vertebral fracture assessments; fracture risk algorithm using femoral neck BMD (FRAX-FN); fracture risk algorithm using body mass index (FRAX-BMI); or Clin Fx or heel ultrasound (heel US).

RESULTS

Treatment eligibility ranged from 17% (Clin Fx) to 98% (FRAX-BMI). VFs were found in 47%, 74% of which were silent. Criteria with Clin Fx, BMD, or VF identified 73% of study participants for treatment. FRAX-FN suggested treatment in 81% but would have missed approximately 10% of individuals with silent VFs. Clin Fx or heel US suggested that 39% of participants were eligible for treatment.

CONCLUSION

Long-term care residents eligible for osteoporosis treatment ranged from fewer than 20% to roughly all residents depending on screening criteria. VFs are common and identify a subset of residents missed by conventional BMD scans or FRAX-FN. A reasonable clinical approach could consider treatment for those with Clin Fx of the hip or spine, radiological evidence of a VF, or osteoporosis according to BMD classification. Prospective studies are needed to determine optimal screening strategies for treatment in this cohort.

Diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis before and after admission to long-term care institutions

SUMMARY

Bisphosphonate treatment rates were examined before and after admission to long-term residential care. Bisphosphonate treatment rates were low (16%) pre-admission but doubled after long-term residential care admission (30%). Men were very undertreated for osteoporosis, while a history of falls with injury was not associated with treatment.

INTRODUCTION

To determine the rates and independent correlates of bisphosphonate treatment in elderly residents before and after admission to long-term care (LTC) institutions.

METHODS

Information was collected from records of 421 residents of four LTC institutions in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Osteoporosis-related diagnoses, treatments, and risk factors including falls in LTC and any adulthood fractures were abstracted. Osteoporosis was defined by physician diagnosis or documented fractures of the hip, spine, or upper extremity. Multivariable analyses were undertaken to determine factors independently associated with bisphosphonate treatment.

RESULTS

Mean age was 84 ± 8 years and 290 (70%) were female. Overall, 142 (34%) had previous fractures, 170 (41%) had physician-diagnosed osteoporosis, and 227 (54%) residents met the study's clinical definition of osteoporosis. Of those with osteoporosis, 44 (19%) were men. Before admission, 36 (16%) patients with osteoporosis were treated with bisphosphonates; after admission another 31 (14%) were started on bisphosphonates by LTC physicians. Women were far more likely than men to start bisphosphonate treatment [30 (97%) women vs. 1 (3%) man, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 9.20 (95% confidence intervals 1.2,70.5)]. Falls with injury were common [72/227 (31%)] but not associated with bisphosphonate treatment (adjusted p value > 0.5).

CONCLUSION

Rates of pre-admission bisphosphonate treatment were low, but did double after LTC admission. Women were almost ten times more likely to start bisphosphonate treatment than men, although one fifth of those with documented osteoporosis were men. Although falls cause most fractures, a history of falls with injury was not associated with bisphosphonate treatment. Our findings suggest that targeting men and residents with falls for treatment with bisphosphonates might be warranted.

Correlations of nursing home characteristics with prescription of osteoporosis medications

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis is highly prevalent in the nursing home (NH) populations but medications that increase bone mineral density are used infrequently. Prior research finds few patient characteristics predict treatment. NH characteristics have been associated with prescription of some medications. We examined associations of NH-level characteristics with osteoporosis treatment in elderly patients admitted to a NH after a fracture.

METHOD

We conducted a cohort study of patients with hip, wrist and humeral fractures admitted to a NH in NJ. They were followed for 12 months from 1999 to 2004. Possible NH-level predictors of receiving osteoporosis treatment were assessed in mixed multivariable models to account for clustering within individual NHs.

RESULTS

Of the 2838 post-fracture patients identified from 180 NHs, 156 (5.5%) were prescribed an osteoporosis medication. There was wide variation in treatment between individual NHs (0-40%), which was substantially reduced after adjusting for patient case mix. Several patient characteristics did associate with osteoporosis treatment-female gender (odds ratio (OR) 2.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.42, 4.61), younger age per year (OR 0.98, 95%CI 0.96, 0.99), white race (OR 2.37, 95%CI 1.23, 4.56) and prior history of fracture (OR 4.41, 95%CI 1.04, 18.73). However no NH characteristics significantly associate with treatment (profit status, NH chain member, occupancy rate, and bed size).

CONCLUSION

NH characteristics did not predict pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis. Further studies of osteoporosis prescribing in NHs need to consider other types of variables as possible correlates of prescribing.

Diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in the older senior

The older senior is at high risk for osteoporosis. It is important for healthcare providers to be fully aware of the potential risks and benefits of diagnosing and treating osteoporosis in the older senior population. Data indicate that bone mineral density testing is under-utilized and drug therapy is often not initiated when indicated in this population. Bone mineral density testing with central dual energy x-ray absorptiometry is essential and cost-effective in this population. All older seniors should be educated on a bone-healthy lifestyle including age-appropriate weight-bearing exercise and smoking cessation if necessary. It is important to remember that falls play a very important role in the risk for osteoporotic fractures, especially in the older senior. All older seniors should be evaluated annually for falls and strategies should be implemented to reduce fall risk in this population. The risk for vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency is high in the older senior and can contribute to falls and fractures. Adequate intakes of calcium and vitamin D are important and deficiencies need to be treated. Data on osteoporosis drug therapy in the older senior are lacking. Based on data from subgroup analyses of large osteoporosis trials in postmenopausal women, current osteoporosis therapies appear safe and efficacious in the older senior and most will live long enough to derive a benefit from these therapies. Further studies are needed in older seniors, especially men, to better understand the risks and benefits of pharmacologic therapy for the management of osteoporosis.

Management of osteoporosis among home health and long-term care patients with a prior fracture

Osteoporosis is a growing health concern as the number of senior adults continues to increase worldwide. Falls and fractures are very common among frail older adults requiring home health and long-term care. Preventative strategies for reducing falls have been identified and many therapies (both prescription and nonprescription) with proven efficacy for reducing fracture risk are available. However, many practitioners overlook the fact that a fragility fracture is diagnostic for osteoporosis even without knowledge of bone mineral density testing. As a result, osteoporosis is infrequently diagnosed and treated in the elderly after a fracture. Based on existing literature, we have developed an algorithm for the assessment and treatment of osteoporosis among persons with known prior fracture(s) living in long-term care facilities or receiving home health care based on the data available in the literature.

Pharmacological management of osteoporosis in nursing home populations: a systematic review

Nursing home (NH) residents fall 11 times as frequently as their age-matched community-dwelling counterparts. The benefits of fall prevention strategies and hip protectors in terms of fracture risk in this setting are unclear. Moreover, there is no consensus on the efficacy of osteoporosis medication in NH residents. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of medications for osteoporosis in this population and to examine utilization studies in the NH setting to define prescribing practices. Electronic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were supplemented with a hand search of bibliographies. All English-language studies published between January 1, 1974, and December 31, 2006, that studied osteoporosis pharmacotherapy in the NH environment were obtained, and studies of medication benefits and utilization patterns were identified. No restrictions were placed on study method. Studies required inclusion of NH patients and extractable data with bone mineral density (BMD) or fracture outcomes. Forty full-text articles were retrieved, of which 15 studies met selection criteria. In the nine studies examining medication effects, calcium (1,200 mg) and vitamin D (800 IU) supplementation were shown to reduce fracture risk and improve BMD. One study supported the role of alendronate, but none documented the utility of raloxifene, calcitonin, or teriparatide in NH residents. All six medication utilization studies reported infrequent use of osteoporosis medications (9-25%). Prescribing for elderly NH patients is difficult, considering the risk:benefit ratio and issues of longevity, but these medications may be underused in the NH environment.

Reversal of the hip fracture secular trend is related to a decrease in the incidence in institution-dwelling elderly women

In this prospective 10-year study in elderly aged 60 years and over, there was a 1.3% per year reduction in the standardized incidence of hip fracture in women but not in men. This decrease was mainly due to changes in the standardized incidence of hip fracture in institution-dwelling women.

INTRODUCTION

A decrease in age-adjusted hip fracture incidence has been recently demonstrated in some countries. Since a large proportion of hip fractures occur in nursing homes, we analyzed whether this decreasing trend would be more detectable in institution-dwelling elderly compared with community-dwelling elderly.

METHODS

All hip fracture patients aged 60 years and over were identified in a well-defined area. Incidence of hip fracture, age- and sex-adjusted to the 2000 Geneva population, was computed in community- and institution-dwelling elderly.

RESULTS

From 1991 to 2000, 1,624 (41%) hip fractures were recorded in institutionalized-dwelling elderly and 2,327 (59%) in community-dwelling elderly. The standardized fracture incidence decreased by 1.3% per year in women (p = 0.039), but remained unchanged in men (+0.5%; p = 0.686). Among institution-dwelling women, hip fracture incidence fell by 1.9% per year (p = 0.044), whereas it remained stable among community-dwelling women (+0.0%, p = 0.978). In men, no significant change in hip fracture incidence occurred among institution- or community-dwelling elderly.

CONCLUSIONS

The decrease in the standardized hip fracture incidence in institution-dwelling women is responsible for the reversal in secular trend. Future research should include stratification according to the residential status to better identify the causes responsible for the trend in hip fracture incidence.

Hip and other osteoporotic fractures increase the risk of subsequent fractures in nursing home residents

Nursing home residents with a history of hip fractures or prior osteoporotic fractures were found to have an increased risk of another osteoporotic fracture over the ensuing two years when compared to nursing home residents with no fracture history.

INTRODUCTION

Because of the high prevalence of osteoporosis and fall risk factors in nursing home residents, it is possible that the importance of previous fracture as a marker for subsequent fracture risk may be diminished. We tested whether a history of prior osteoporotic fractures would identify residents at increased risk of additional fractures after nursing home admission.

METHODS

We identified all Medicare enrollees aged 50 and older who were in a nursing home in North Carolina in 2000 (n=30,655). We examined Medicare hospitalization claims to determine which enrollees had been hospitalized in the preceding 4 years for a hip fracture (n=7,257) or other fracture (n=663). We followed participants from nursing home entry until the end of 2002 using Medicare hospital claims to determine which participants were hospitalized with a subsequent fracture (n=3,381).

RESULTS

Among residents with no recent fracture history, 6.8% had a hospital claim for a subsequent fracture, while 15.1% of those with a prior non-hip fracture and 23.9% of participants with a prior hip fracture sustained subsequent fractures. Multivariate proportional hazards models of time to fracture indicated that persons with prior hip fractures are at three times higher risk (HR=2.99, 95% CI: 2.78, 3.21) and those hospitalized with other non-hip fractures are at 1.8 times higher risk of subsequent fractures (HR=1.84, 95% CI: 1.50, 2.25).

CONCLUSION

Nursing home residents hospitalized with a prior osteoporotic fracture are at increased risk of a fracture.

Randomized trial to improve fracture prevention in nursing home residents

BACKGROUND

Interventions to improve the fracture prevention in nursing homes are needed.

METHODS

Cluster-randomized, single-blind, controlled trial of a multi-modal quality improvement intervention. Nursing homes (n=67) with > or =10 residents with a diagnosis of osteoporosis or recent hip fracture (n=606) were randomized to receive an early or delayed intervention consisting of audit and feedback, educational modules, teleconferences, and academic detailing. Medical record abstraction and the Minimum Data Set were used to measure the prescription of osteoporosis therapies before and after the intervention period. Analysis was at the facility-level and Generalized Estimating Equation modeling was used to account for clustering.

RESULTS

No significant improvements were observed in any of the quality indicators. The use of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy or hip protectors improved by 8.0% in the intervention group and 0.6% in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P=.72). Participation in the intervention activities was low, but completion of the educational module (odds ratio [OR] 4.8, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-12.0) and direct physician contact by an academic detailer (OR 4.5, 95% CI, 1.1-18.2) were significantly associated with prescription of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy or hip protectors in multivariable models.

CONCLUSIONS

Audit-feedback and education interventions were ineffective in improving fracture prevention in the nursing home setting, although results may have been tempered by low participation in the intervention activities.

Use of osteoporosis medications in older nursing facility residents

INTRODUCTION

Epidemiologic studies demonstrated that 70% to 85% of nursing home residents have osteoporosis. Few studies report comprehensive information about treatment of osteoporosis in nursing facilities.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of osteoporosis treatment and identify resident characteristics associated with the use of antiresorptive medications or supplements indicated to treat osteoporosis in nursing homes.

METHODS

The study design was cross-sectional. The Systematic Assessment of Geriatric Drug Use via Epidemiology database provided the data. From this database, 186,221 residents were identified as newly admitted to nursing facilities in Kansas, Maine, Missouri, Ohio, and South Dakota between 1998 and 2000. The outcome measure was the use of antiresorptive medications (alendronate, risedronate, calcitonin, estrogen, raloxifene) or supplements (calcium with vitamin D) indicated for treatment of osteoporosis. The independent variables included demographic, health status, and fracture risk factors.

RESULTS

Of the overall sample, 9.1% received antiresorptive medications and/or supplements indicated for osteoporosis treatment. The most commonly used treatment was the combination of calcium and vitamin D (5.0%). Calcitonin (2.5%) use exceeded that of any other antiresorptive. Multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that a diagnosis of osteoporosis and female gender were strongly associated with being more likely to receive an osteoporosis treatment (OR 6.34 with 95% CI 6.11-6.64 and OR 2.67 with 95% CI 2.53-2.83 respectively). The number of medications residents received was also strongly associated with receiving osteoporosis treatment. Being black and having 4 or more active diagnoses were strongly associated with lower odds of receiving treatment (OR 0.63 with 95% CI 0.57-0.68 and OR 0.71 with 95% CI 0.68-0.74 for 4 to 6 diagnoses).

DISCUSSION

Newly admitted nursing facility residents infrequently received an indicated osteoporosis treatment, including calcium with vitamin D, despite the expected high prevalence of osteoporosis in this setting. Few demographic, health status, and fracture risk factors were strongly associated with receiving indicated treatment.

Prevalence and predictors of osteoporosis treatment in nursing home residents with known osteoporosis or recent fracture

SUMMARY

We studied nursing home residents with osteoporosis or recent fracture to determine the frequency and predictors of osteoporosis treatment. There was wide variation in performance, and both clinical and systems variables predicted use. This study shows that improvement in osteoporosis care is possible and important for many nursing homes.

INTRODUCTION

We determined the prevalence and predictors of osteoporosis evaluation and treatment in high-risk nursing home residents.

METHODS

We identified 67 nursing facilities in North Carolina and Arizona with > 10 residents with osteoporosis or recent hip fracture. Medical records (n=895) were abstracted for osteoporosis evaluation [dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), vitamin D level, serum calcium), treatment (calcium, vitamin D, osteoporosis medication, hip protectors), clinical, and systems covariates. Data were analyzed at the facility level using mixed models to account for the complex nesting of residents within providers and nursing facilities.

RESULTS

Calcium and vitamin D was prescribed for 69% of residents, bisphosphonates for 19%, calcitonin for 14%, other pharmacologic therapies for 6%, and hip protectors for 2%. Overall, 36% received any bone protection (medication or hip protectors), with wide variation among facilities (0-85%). Factors significantly associated with any bone protection included female gender [odds ratio (OR) 2.4, (1.5-3.7)] and nonurban/suburban location [1.5, (1.1-2.2)]. Residents with esophagitis, peptic ulcer disease (PUD), or dysphagia [0.6, (0.4-0.9)] and alcohol abuse [0.2, (0.0-0.9)] were less likely to receive treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

There is substantial variation in the quality of osteoporosis treatment across nursing homes. Interventions that improve osteoporosis quality of care are needed.

Gaps in treatment among users of osteoporosis medications: the dynamics of noncompliance

PURPOSE

Cyclical patterns of compliance have been observed with many health-related activities such as dieting and exercise. It is not known whether such patterns of compliance exist among users of chronic medications. We sought to estimate the percentage of patients who restart osteoporosis therapy after a prolonged lapse in medication use and to identify the factors associated with a return to compliance.

METHODS

We studied 26,636 new users of an osteoporosis medication (alendronate, calcitonin, estrogen, raloxifene, or risedronate) who were age 65 or older and had an extended lapse in refill compliance, defined as a period of at least 60 days after the completion of one prescription in which no refill for any osteoporosis medication was obtained. Survival curves were used to estimate the length of time until therapy is resumed. We estimated the association between patient characteristics and the rate of resuming treatment using Cox proportional hazards analysis. We then conducted a case crossover analysis to examine whether certain events occurring during follow-up triggered a return to refill compliance.

RESULTS

Of patients who stopped therapy for at least 60 days, an estimated 30% restarted treatment within 6 months, and 50% restarted within 2 years. Among patients who had at least 6 months of continuous use before their interruption in treatment (n=5863), 42% restarted therapy within 6 months and 59% within 2 years. Younger patients, women, and those with a history of a fracture were more likely to return after a break in medication use. Recent hip fractures, discharges from nursing homes, and bone mineral density testing also predicted a return to treatment.

CONCLUSION

Extended gaps in treatment are common among users of osteoporosis medications. Because the effectiveness of these drugs used in an interrupted way is unknown, compliance interventions should emphasize the need for continuous medication use. Further research is needed to understand why patients often go for months without refilling prescriptions and also whether similar utilization patterns exist for other chronic medications.

To Treat or Not To Treat, That Is the Question: Proceedings of the Quebec Symposium for the Treatment of Osteoporosis in Long-Term Care Institutions, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec, November 5, 2004

OBJECTIVES

Patients in long-term care institutions (LTCI) are especially at risk for osteoporotic fractures owing to their lack of mobility, poor nutrition, and limited sun exposure. Previous reports have shown that osteoporosis is underdiagnosed and undertreated in LTCI despite the high incidence of osteoporotic fractures in these settings. This document has been developed to assist clinicians practicing in LTCI with the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in their institutionalized patients. These proceedings offer an overview of the particular characteristics of patients at LTCI. Management strategies include both nonpharmacological and pharmacological interventions for the prevention and treatment of osteoporotic fractures in very frail older subjects.

PARTICIPANTS

This guide is an edited review of presentations and discussions held by specialists in osteoporosis in the elderly together with physicians and pharmacists practicing in LTCI in the province of Quebec. This symposium was held in Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec on November 5, 2004.

VALUES

The value of a given diagnostic test or treatment option was determined based on the clinical experiences and opinions of the participants and a review of the literature from an evidence-based perspective.

RECOMMENDATIONS

All patients located at LTCI are at potential risk for osteoporotic fractures. Global interventions should include vitamin D, calcium, and a comprehensive exercise program. In patients who are at high risk for osteoporotic fractures or with previous fractures, pharmacological treatment should be started.

VALIDATION

These recommendations were approved during the final plenary of the symposium. All the prevailing opinions were summarized and included in this article.

Osteoporotic fractures in older adults

Osteoporotic fractures are emerging as a major public health problem in the aging population. Fractures result in increased morbidity, mortality and health expenditures. This article reviews current evidence for the management of common issues following osteoporotic fractures in older adults including: (1) thromboembolism prevention; (2) delirium prevention; (3) pain management; (4) rehabilitation; (5) assessing the cause of fracture; and (6) prevention of subsequent fractures. Areas for practice improvement and further research are highlighted.