Partial D, weak D types, and novel RHD alleles among 33,864 multiethnic patients: implications for anti-D alloimmunization and prevention

Weak and partial D phenotyping: a comparison study between molecular and serologic results

Variant D antigens can cause variable serologic results when typing with Anti-D reagents. There is limited information regarding the ability of Anti-D reagents to differentiate between D variants defined by RHD genotyping. This study was performed to determine if a panel of 20 U.S. Food and Drug Administration-licensed Anti-D reagents can identify molecularly defined D variants. Red blood cells from 119 donors carrying variant RHD alleles were tested at immediate spin (IS) and/or by the indirect antiglobuin test (IAT) using conventional test tube and/or column agglutination technology. Reaction strength at IS and IAT was reviewed to determine whether a pattern of reactivity could be correlated with a specific D variant. Agglutination results from each sample with each Anti-D reagent were combined to assess overall reactivity. The sample set consisted of 21 D variants, based on prior RHD genotyping. Of these variants, nine categories had three or more samples used for analysis (N = 102); 25 RHD*01W.1, 15 RHD*01W.2, 14 RHD*01W.3, 17 RHD*09.01, 14 RHD*09.03, 4 RHD*01W.4, 23 RHD*07, 4 RHD*10.05, and 6 reference allele RHD*01. As expected, IS showed more negative or weak reactions, and IAT produced more positive reactions with 3+/4+ agglutination strength. RHD*01W.3 samples showed strongest reactivity at IS and IAT. Greatest variation in reactivity was observed with RHD*01W.2, showing weakest overall reactivity at IS. All weak D types had at least one sample that yielded a negative result and one sample with 4+ agglutination at IS. Although there were general patterns of reactivity for each variant tested, no one pattern defined all samples carrying the same RHD allele. This study demonstrated that even with 20 different Anti-D reagents, serologic testing alone is insufficient to define weak or partial D types, characterize the risk for alloanti-D, or determine candidacy for Rh immune globulin. The results illustrate how multiple Anti-D reagents can be used to identify samples that should be reflexed to molecular testing.

Serological Weak Expression of D Antigen: A Retrospective Study of Blood Donors and Patients at a Teaching Hospital in Eastern India

Background and objective RhD variants show altered D antigen expression, affecting their serological detection. Proper identification is crucial due to potential anti-D antibody formation. This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the frequency and characteristics of D variant cases encountered during RhD typing in both blood donors and recipients and the transfusion implications. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of the D variant involving all the donors and patients whose samples were tested for blood grouping. RhD typing was done using monoclonal anti-D reagents via conventional tube technique (CTT) and column agglutination technique (CAT). Weak reactions (≤ 2+) were retested with different antisera. Weak D (Du) testing was conducted on serologically negative RhD results in donors. D variants were suspected based on discrepancies between CTT and CAT, weak reactions with different antisera, positive Du testing in RhD-negative donors, or anti-D alloimmunization in RhD-positive individuals. Data are presented in numbers and percentages. The odds ratio (OR) determining the association between different blood groups and age groups with the D variant in the donor population was calculated. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results D variants were found in 0.11% of donors and 0.039% of patients, with 21.7% being females. In the patient population, all the D variant cases were from surgical patients with transfusion requests; three received RhD-negative units, while seven did not require transfusions. D variants were more common in adult donors (25-44 years), with an 8.5 times higher occurrence in the AB group compared to the A group. Conclusions The D variant has a high prevalence in eastern India. Regional centers should be equipped to accurately identify and differentiate D variants, enabling improved management and effective conservation of RhD-negative units.

Evaluation of the LightCycler® PRO Instrument as a Platform for Rhesus D Typing

Rapid and reliable Rhesus D typing is crucial for blood donation centers. In instances of massive blood transfusion or reduced antigen expression, DNA-based phenotype prediction becomes mandatory. Our molecular RHD typing approach involves an initial real-time PCR for the most common aberrant RHD types in our region, RHD*01W.1 (weak D type 1), RHD*01W.2 (weak D type 2), RHD*01W.3 (weak D type 3), and RHD*07.01 (DVII). For comprehensive coverage, Sanger sequencing of RHD coding regions is performed in the case of PCR target-negative results. We evaluated the specificity and accuracy of these methods using the recently launched LightCycler® PRO real-time platform. All findings demonstrated remarkable accuracy. Notably, the LightCycler® PRO instrument offers a distinct advantage in data interpretation and integration via the HL7 interface. This study underlines the importance of including advanced molecular techniques in blood typing protocols, especially in scenarios where conventional serological methods may be insufficient.

A Bioinformatically Initiated Approach to Evaluate GATA1 Regulatory Regions in Samples with Weak D, Del, or D- Phenotypes Despite Normal RHD Exons

Introduction

With over 360 blood group antigens in systems recognized, there are antigens, such as RhD, which demonstrate a quantitative reduction in antigen expression due to nucleotide variants in the non-coding region of the gene that result in aberrant splicing or a regulatory mechanism. This study aimed to evaluate bioinformatically predicted GATA1-binding regulatory motifs in the RHD gene for samples presenting with weak or apparently negative RhD antigen expression but showing normal RHD exons.

Methods

Publicly available open chromatin region data were overlayed with GATA1 motif candidates in RHD. Genomic DNA from weak D, Del or D- samples with normal RHD exons (n = 13) was used to confirm RHD zygosity by quantitative PCR. Then, RHD promoter, intron 1, and intron 2 regions were amplified for Sanger sequencing to detect potential disruptions in the GATA1 motif candidates. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) was performed to assess GATA1-binding. Luciferase assays were used to assess transcriptional activity.

Results

Bioinformatic analysis identified five of six GATA1 motif candidates in the promoter, intron 1 and intron 2 for investigation in the samples. Luciferase assays showed an enhancement in transcription for GATA1 motifs in intron 1 and for intron 2 only when the R 2 haplotype variant (rs675072G>A) was present. GATA1 motifs were intact in 12 of 13 samples. For one sample with a Del phenotype, a novel RHD c.1-110A>C variant disrupted the GATA1 motif in the promoter which was supported by a lack of a GATA1 supershift in the EMSA and 73% transcriptional activity in the luciferase assay. Two samples were D+/D- chimeras.

Conclusion

The bioinformatic predictions enabled the identification of a novel DEL allele, RHD c.1-110A>C, which disrupted the GATA1 motif in the proximal promoter. Although the majority of the samples investigated here remain unexplained, we provide GATA1 targets which may benefit future RHD regulatory investigations.

Estimating the serological underrecognition of patients with weak or partial RHD variants

BACKGROUND

For patients with weak or discrepant RhD RBC phenotypes, RHD genotyping is employed to determine need for RhD-negative management. However, many RHD variants are type D-negative or D-positive. Serological recognition rates (RRs) of weak and partial RHD variants are poorly characterized.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Four US studies employing RHD genotyping for weak or discrepant RhD phenotypes provided data for race/ethnicity-specific serological recognition. Three studies used microplate, and 1 used gel and tube; 2 had anti-D data. We obtained White and Hispanic/Latino allele frequencies (AFs) of weak D types 1, 2, and 3 single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) from the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, v4.0.0) and devised Hardy-Weinberg-based formulas to correct for gnomAD's overcount of hemizygous RHD SNVs as homozygous. We compiled common partial RHD AF from genotyped cohorts of US Black or sickle cell disease subjects. From variant AF, we calculated hemizygous-plus-homozygous genetic prevalences. Serological prevalence: genetic prevalence ratios yielded serological RRs.

RESULTS

Overall RRs of weak D types 1-3 were 17% (95% confidence interval 12%-24%) in Whites and 12% (5%-27%) in Hispanics/Latinos. For eight partial RHD variants in Blacks, overall RR was 11% (8%-14%). However, DAR RR was 80% (38%-156%). Compared to microplate, gel-tube recognition was higher for type 2 and DAU5 and lower for type 4.0. Anti-D was present in 6% of recognized partial RHD cases, but only in 0.7% of estimated total genetic cases.

DISCUSSION

Based on AF, >80% of patients with weak or partial RHD variants were unrecognized serologically. Although overall anti-D rates were low, better detection of partial RHD variants is desirable.

RHD-negative red cells may be avoided for patients with ambiguous serologic typing for the RHD antigen

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Serologic typing with monoclonal anti-D is mandatory for RHD antigen determination before transfusion, but due to aberrant (weak or partial) variants of RHD, results may be ambiguous and molecular RHD-typing is required. Before that, RHD-negative (RHD -) red blood cells concentrates (RBCs) shall be transfused to avoid anti-D formation, which probably leads to wastage of RHD - RBCs. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: All patients with ambiguous results in serologic RHD-typing and molecular RHD-typing were assessed retrospectively. The proportions of patients at risk for anti-D formation and the proportion of RHD - RBCs transfused unnecessarily were evaluated for the following transfusion strategies: (1) RHD-positive (RHD + )RBCs for all patients, (2) RHD + RBCs for patients with at least 2+ reaction with anti-D, (3) RHD + RBCs for patients with C and/or E in their RHCE-phenotype, (4) RHD + RBCs for patients with C and/or E and at least 2+ reaction, and (5) RHD - RBCs for all patients.

RESULTS

A total of 112 patients were included. Most had weak D type 1-3 and a minority had other, rare RHD variants. The risk of anti-D formation was 4.5%, 2.9%, 1.8%, 1.0%, and 0% for strategies 1-5, respectively. The proportion of RHD - RBCs transfused unnecessarily was 0%, 49.5%, 0.9%, 50.5%, and 95.5%.

CONCLUSION

Transfusing patients with a C and/or E in their RHCE-phenotype with RHD + RBCs resulted in a very low risk of immunization while avoiding wastage of RHD - RBCs. Therefore, this strategy should be used for some patients with ambiguous results in serologic RHD-typing and pending results of molecular RHD-typing.

Rh flow cytometry: An updated methodology for D antigen density applied to weak D types 164 and 165

BACKGROUND

An original methodology for determining the D antigen density on red cells was published in 2000 and has been applied in many publications since. This flow cytometry-based assay remained largely unrevised utilizing monoclonal anti-Ds that are not readily available anymore. We updated the methodology to quantify erythrocyte D antigen sites using microspheres and monoclonal anti-Ds that are commercially available today.

METHODS

The absolute D antigen density of a frozen standard CcDEe cell, drawn in 2003, a fresh blood donation from the same individual, drawn in 2022, and an internal control CcDEe cell, was quantified by flow cytometry using fluorescence-labeled microspheres. The internal control CcDEe cell was used in conjunction with 9 commercial anti-Ds to determine D antigen densities of 7 normal D, 4 partial D, and 11 weak D type samples, including 2 novel alleles.

RESULTS

The reproducibility of the updated assay was evaluated with red cells of published D antigen densities. The current results matched the known ones closely. The new weak D types 164 and 165 carried 4500 and 1505 D antigens/red cell, respectively. The absolute D antigen density decreased from 27,231 to 26,037 in an individual over 19 years.

DISCUSSION

The updated assay gave highly reproducible results for the D antigen densities of Rh phenotypes. Readily available anti-Ds allowed for the determination of the D antigen densities of 7 weak D types. The assay is suitable to evaluate the effects of distinct amino acid substitutions on the RhD phenotype.

Validation of a non-invasive prenatal test for fetal RhD, C, c, E, K and Fya antigens

We developed and validated a next generation sequencing-(NGS) based NIPT assay using quantitative counting template (QCT) technology to detect RhD, C, c, E, K (Kell), and Fya (Duffy) fetal antigen genotypes from maternal blood samples in the ethnically diverse U.S. population. Quantitative counting template (QCT) technology is utilized to enable quantification and detection of paternally derived fetal antigen alleles in cell-free DNA with high sensitivity and specificity. In an analytical validation, fetal antigen status was determined for 1061 preclinical samples with a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 99-100%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI 99-100%). Independent analysis of two duplicate plasma samples was conducted for 1683 clinical samples, demonstrating precision of 99.9%. Importantly, in clinical practice the no-results rate was 0% for 711 RhD-negative non-alloimmunized pregnant people and 0.1% for 769 alloimmunized pregnancies. In a clinical validation, NIPT results were 100% concordant with corresponding neonatal antigen genotype/serology for 23 RhD-negative pregnant individuals and 93 antigen evaluations in 30 alloimmunized pregnancies. Overall, this NGS-based fetal antigen NIPT assay had high performance that was comparable to invasive diagnostic assays in a validation study of a diverse U.S. population as early as 10 weeks of gestation, without the need for a sample from the biological partner. These results suggest that NGS-based fetal antigen NIPT may identify more fetuses at risk for hemolytic disease than current clinical practice, which relies on paternal genotyping and invasive diagnostics and therefore is limited by adherence rates and incorrect results due to non-paternity. Clinical adoption of NIPT for the detection of fetal antigens for both alloimmunized and RhD-negative non-alloimmunized pregnant individuals may streamline care and reduce unnecessary treatment, monitoring, and patient anxiety.

Prevalence of weak D phenotypes in the general population of Québec, Canada: A focus on weak D type 42

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Weak D type 42 accounts for an unusually high proportion of weak D phenotypes in Québec (Canada), which contrasts with other predominantly White populations. However, its prevalence in the general population is unknown. We estimated the prevalence of weak D type 42 and other common weak D phenotypes in Québec.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We screened for RHD*01W.42 alleles among 1000 individuals of CARTaGENE-a cohort representative of Québec's population. The prevalence of weak D type 42 was calculated based on the allele frequency of RHD*01W.42 and d (i.e., all recessive alleles that confer a D- phenotype), assuming a Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. This prevalence was then leveraged to calculate that of other common weak D phenotypes, using published prevalence estimates among weak D phenotypes.

RESULTS

Two individuals harboured the RHD*01W.42/RHD*01 heterozygous genotype. Assuming an allele frequency of 38.19% for d, the overall prevalence of weak D type 42 was 0.08%. The following prevalence estimates were also obtained: 0.44% for all weak D phenotypes and 0.07%, 0.01% and 0.04% for weak D types 1, 2 and 3, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Québec has the highest documented prevalence of weak D type 42, which was estimated at 0.08%.

Transfusion support for a patient with alloanti-D and the RHD*DV.1 allele

BACKGROUND

Safe blood transfusion is significantly affected by the complex antigen polymorphism and a high proportion of autoantibodies of the Rh blood group system.

THE PATIENT AND METHODS

A male Chinese patient with primary biliary cirrhosis, esophageal and gastric rupture, and bleeding was admitted to our hospital. Blood typing identified that he had serological O and D+ blood groups. Because autoantibody was not detected using routine immediate spin (IS) and indirect antiglobulin test (IAT), he was treated by transfusing D+ red blood cells (RBCs). However, this treatment was ineffective. Thus, manual polybrene test (MPT) and low ionic salt solution indirect antiglobulin test (LISS-IAT) were performed, followed by exon sequencing of the RHD gene.

RESULTS

The patient was confirmed as a DV Type 1 individual by gene sequencing, and had 4+ RhD antigen agglutination. The anti-D in serum and elution could only be detected by MPT (2+ agglutination) and LISS-IAT methods (1+/3+ agglutination). It was presumed that attenuated alloantibody contributed to ineffective RBC transfusion, causing a transient increase in hemoglobin (HGB) before falling back to 50 g/L or even lower within four days.

CONCLUSION

Genotyping helps to support the specificity of detecting autoantibodies and alloantibodies. Combining more serological methods with molecular technology in blood typing is beneficial to improve the safety and effectiveness of blood transfusion.

Obstetric and Newborn Weak D-Phenotype RBC Testing and Rh Immune Globulin Management Recommendations: Lessons From a Blinded Specimen-Testing Survey of 81 Transfusion Services

CONTEXT.—

Modern RHD genotyping can be used to determine when patients with serologic weak D phenotypes have RHD gene variants at risk for anti-D alloimmunization. However, serologic testing, RhD interpretations, and laboratory management of these patients are quite variable.

OBJECTIVE.—

To obtain interlaboratory comparisons of serologic testing, RhD interpretations, Rh immune globulin (RhIG) management, fetomaternal hemorrhage testing, and RHD genotyping for weak D-reactive specimens.

DESIGN.—

We devised an educational exercise in which 81 transfusion services supporting obstetrics performed tube-method RhD typing on 2 unknown red blood cell challenge specimens identified as (1) maternal and (2) newborn. Both specimens were from the same weak D-reactive donor. The exercise revealed how participants responded to these different clinical situations.

RESULTS.—

Of reporting laboratories, 14% (11 of 80) obtained discrepant immediate-spin reactions on the 2 specimens. Nine different reporting terms were used to interpret weak D-reactive maternal RhD types to obstetricians. In laboratories obtaining negative maternal immediate-spin reactions, 28% (16 of 57) performed unwarranted antiglobulin testing, sometimes leading to recommendations against giving RhIG. To screen for excess fetomaternal hemorrhage after a weak D-reactive newborn, 47% (34 of 73) of reporting laboratories would have employed a contraindicated fetal rosette test, risking false-negative results and inadequate RhIG coverage. Sixty percent (44 of 73) of laboratories would obtain RHD genotyping in some or all cases.

CONCLUSIONS.—

For obstetric and neonatal patients with serologic weak D phenotypes, we found several critical problems in transfusion service laboratory practices. We provide recommendations for appropriate testing, consistent immunohematologic terminology, and RHD genotype-guided management of Rh immune globulin therapy and RBC transfusions.

Weak D type 42: Antigen density and risk of alloimmunization in the province of Québec

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

A high proportion of suspected weak D patients referred to Héma-Québec were genotyped as weak D type 42 (368/2105, 17.5%). These patients are currently considered D with regard to RhD immunoprophylaxis in pregnancy and transfusion. The goal of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the risk of alloimmunization in weak D type 42 patients and to characterize their RhD surface molecule expression on red blood cells (RBCs) in comparison to other weak D types (1, 2 and 3).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis using the weak D type 42 patients' medical data to verify potential anti-D alloimmunization events was conducted. Quantitative analyses using flow cytometry were also performed on RBCs to quantify the cell surface density of the D antigen.

RESULTS

Data on 215 subjects with weak D type 42 were reviewed. None developed immune allo-anti-D; three had definite exposure to D+ red cells and 41 had possible exposure through pregnancy. Flow cytometry analysis showed that weak D types 1, 2, 3 and 42 had relative antigen densities of 2.7%, 2.2%, 8.1% and 3.6%, respectively, with R1R2 red cells referencing 100% density. The estimated antigen density range of weak D type 42 was 819-1104 sites per RBC.

CONCLUSION

Our retrospective alloimmunization data analysis and antigen density study establish a basis for the consideration of a weak D type 42 individual as D+. This consideration would allow for a targeted reduction of RhD immunoprophylaxis in pregnancy and the unjustified use of D- units for transfusion.

Blood Group Testing

Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is one of the most frequently performed clinical procedures and therapies to improve tissue oxygen delivery in hospitalized patients worldwide. Generally, the cross-match is the mandatory test in place to meet the clinical needs of RBC transfusion by examining donor-recipient compatibility with antigens and antibodies of blood groups. Blood groups are usually an individual's combination of antigens on the surface of RBCs, typically of the ABO blood group system and the RH blood group system. Accurate and reliable blood group typing is critical before blood transfusion. Serological testing is the routine method for blood group typing based on hemagglutination reactions with RBC antigens against specific antibodies. Nevertheless, emerging technologies for blood group testing may be alternative and supplemental approaches when serological methods cannot determine blood groups. Moreover, some new technologies, such as the evolving applications of blood group genotyping, can precisely identify variant antigens for clinical significance. Therefore, this review mainly presents a clinical overview and perspective of emerging technologies in blood group testing based on the literature. Collectively, this may highlight the most promising strategies and promote blood group typing development to ensure blood transfusion safety.

Updated Evaluation of RhD Status Among Women of Child-Bearing Age in Detroit, Michigan

OBJECTIVES

The Rh blood group system is one of the most important and immunogenic blood group systems after the ABO blood group system and, like other blood group antigens, it follows ethnic and racial trends. However, when it comes to D variants-partial D and weak D-most of the cohorts studied in the literature have been of European descent. This study aimed to discover the variant D trends in Detroit, Michigan, with an emphasis on Black communities.

METHODS

From 2016 to 2018, there were 102 patients (women of childbearing potential: < 50 years) at Henry Ford Hospital that had serologic D discrepant testing. These patients were sent out for molecular RHD determination.

RESULTS

In total, 12.7% of patients were characterized as RhD positive and 87.3% of patients were characterized as RhD variants (nominated as RhD negative at our institution).

CONCLUSIONS

Our predominantly Black cohort sheds light on the diversity of the RhD antigen. The majority of Blacks were classified as RhD variants (RhD negative nomination at our institution). Therefore, molecular testing for this patient population with serologic RhD discrepancies is paramount to properly manage their obstetric care.

Systematic RHD genotyping in Brazilians reveals a high frequency of partial D in transfused patients serologically typed as weak D

BACKGROUND

The discrimination between weak D types and partial D can be of clinical importance because carriers of partial D antigen may develop anti-D when transfused with D-positive red blood cell units. The aim of this study was to determine by molecular analysis the type of D variants among Brazilian patients requiring transfusions with serologic weak D phenotypes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Samples from 87 patients (53 with sickle cell disease, 10 with thalassemia and 24 with myelodysplastic syndrome), serologic typed as weak D by manual tube indirect antiglobulin test or gel test were first RHD genotyped by using the RHD BeadChip Kit (BioArray, Immucor). Sanger sequencing was performed when necessary.

RESULTS

RHD molecular analysis revealed 32 (36.8 %) variant RHD alleles encoding weak D phenotypes and 55 (63.2 %) alleles encoding partial D antigens. RHD variant alleles were present in the homozygous state or as a single RHD allele, one variant RHD allele associated with the RHDΨ allele, or two different variant RHD alleles in compound heterozygosity with each other in 70 patients, 4 patients and 13 patients, respectively. Alloanti-D was found in 9 (16.4 %) cases with RHD alleles predicting a partial D.

DISCUSSION

The frequency of partial D was higher than weak D types in Brazilian patients serologically typed as weak D, showing the importance to differentiate weak D types and partial D in transfused patients to establish a transfusion policy recommendation.

Blood groups of Neandertals and Denisova decrypted

Blood group systems were the first phenotypic markers used in anthropology to decipher the origin of populations, their migratory movements, and their admixture. The recent emergence of new technologies based on the decoding of nucleic acids from an individual’s entire genome has relegated them to their primary application, blood transfusion. Thus, despite the finer mapping of the modern human genome in relation to Neanderthal and Denisova populations, little is known about red cell blood groups in these archaic populations. Here we analyze the available high-quality sequences of three Neanderthals and one Denisovan individuals for 7 blood group systems that are used today in transfusion (ABO including H/Se, Rh (Rhesus), Kell, Duffy, Kidd, MNS, Diego). We show that Neanderthal and Denisova were polymorphic for ABO and shared blood group alleles recurrent in modern Sub-Saharan populations. Furthermore, we found ABO-related alleles currently preventing from viral gut infection and Neanderthal RHD and RHCE alleles nowadays associated with a high risk of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Such a common blood group pattern across time and space is coherent with a Neanderthal population of low genetic diversity exposed to low reproductive success and with their inevitable demise. Lastly, we connect a Neanderthal RHD allele to two present-day Aboriginal Australian and Papuan, suggesting that a segment of archaic genome was introgressed in this gene in non-Eurasian populations. While contributing to both the origin and late evolutionary history of Neanderthal and Denisova, our results further illustrate that blood group systems are a relevant piece of the puzzle helping to decipher it.

High prevalence of weak D type 42 in a large-scale RHD genotyping program in the province of Quebec (Canada)

BACKGROUND

The determination of the RhD phenotype is crucial to avoid alloimmunization, especially in childbearing women. Following the 2015 recommendation from the Work Group on RHD Genotyping, a large-scale RHD genotyping program was implemented in the province of Quebec (Canada) and offered to women ≤45 years old with a serological weak D or discordant results. Since weak D type 42 was previously shown to be prevalent among French Canadians, genotyping for that variant was also performed. Our aim was to report the prevalence of the weak D alleles in the province of Quebec.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A retrospective study of 2105 women with serological weak D referred to Hema-Quebec's immunohematology reference laboratory (IRL) between June 2016 and May 2020 was conducted. Results from the serological tests performed by the referring hospital were compiled and RHD were genotyped.

RESULTS

Most patients presented at least one serological result ≤2+ before being referred to Hema-Quebec. Weak D type 42 was the most prevalent variant, representing 17.5% (368/2105) of all individuals tested. Only 15.3% (323/2105) of patients were weak D type 1, 3.3% (69/2105) were type 2, and 8.6% (180/2105) were type 3. Weak D type 42 is highly expressed in regions with low immigration rate and known for their founder effect.

CONCLUSION

Our RHD genotyping program allowed for a better management of weak D. The province of Quebec presents a unique RHD genotype distribution. We confirmed that weak D type 42 is associated with a founder effect found in Caucasian French Canadians.

High prevalence of serological weak D phenotype and preponderance of weak D type 4.0.1. genetic variant in a Nigerian population: implications for transfusion practice in a resource-limited setting

Introduction

Prevalence of RhD negative phenotype in Nigeria is low; this leads to scarcity of RhD negative red cells for transfusion. Serological and molecular genotyping of RhD negative individuals for weak D types could reduce this scarcity. The aim of this study was to determine the serological prevalence and molecular types of weak D phenotypes among blood donors and pregnant women in Kano, Nigeria.

Methods

A total of 4482 blood donors and pregnant women from three hospitals in Kano were recruited. An indirect antiglobulin test was used to determine weak D phenotypes. Molecular genotyping was performed on genomic DNA from whole blood amplified by polymerase chain reaction sequence-specific primers (PCR-SSP) with agarose gel electrophoresis.

Results

The mean age of the participants was 26.50 ± 5.79 years. The prevalence of the RhD negative phenotype was 4.2% (189/4482). Of the 189 RhD negative phenotypes, 20 (10.6%) were weak D positive. Molecular genotyping of the 20 Weak D positive phenotypes revealed 15 (75%) weak D type 4, of which 11 were due to the RHD*09.03 and RHD*DAR3 (T201R, F223V) polymorphisms and 4, due to RHD* 08.01 and RHD* DFV polymorphisms; 2 (10%) were due to the 602 C>G polymorphism, while the remaining 3 (15%) constituted partial D or other rare weak D types.

Conclusion

The prevalence of weak D positive phenotypes is high in this study; weak D type 4 is the most common RhD genetic variant. Routine serologic weak D testing of RhD negative blood and molecular genotyping should be encouraged in resource-limited settings.

Implementation of a Standardized Prenatal Testing Protocol in an Integrated, Multihospital Health System

OBJECTIVES

When our institution grew into an integrated multihospital health system, we were faced with the need to standardize laboratory processes, including blood bank processes, across all locations. The purpose of this article is to describe our experience of standardizing the protocols for prenatal testing.

METHODS

For each hospital in the system, we established service tiers to define tests offered on site or referred to another location. For each prenatal test, we examined the related processes for ways to improve uniformity, efficiency, and reliability. Throughout this process of standardization, we collaborated with the clinical services to gain concurrence on the interpretation and reporting of results.

RESULTS

We created and implemented a uniform protocol for testing prenatal patients. The protocol standardized the definition of critical titer, instituted criteria to identify passively acquired anti-D, and established a process for the follow-up of women with inconsistent serologic results on Rh(D) typing.

CONCLUSIONS

Close collaboration with the clinical services ensured that our testing protocol is aligned with the needs of the integrated obstetrics service in the health system. The approach described in this article may provide a plan outline for pathologists facing similar challenges at other integrated health systems.

Identification of RHD allelic variants discovered by atypical typing results on the NEO/Echo platforms

Some individuals are at risk of anti-D alloimmunization if they inherit D antigens that are qualitatively and/or quantitatively different than wild-type D. We hypothesized that patients who showed serologically inconsistent, weak, or historically discordant D typing results by microplate direct agglutination (MDA) on NEO or Echo (Immucor, Norcross, GA) might be at risk of carrying RHD allelic variants. The present study was designed to evaluate patients with RHD allelic variants if they presented with weakly reactive D typing results on the NEO or Echo. Patients were selected for RHD genotyping if their specimens showed weak reactivity with either series 4 or series 5 anti-D typing reagent, if the strength of reactivity was ≤1+ on the NEO or Echo, or if historical or current D typing results were discordant with current results. Patients selected for RHD genotyping were also tested by saline tube testing using the same anti-D series 4 and 5 reagents. Genotyping was performed by the Immucor genotyping laboratory in Warren, NJ. Of 80 patients whose samples met study inclusion, 52 (65.0%) were found to have RHD allelic variants. Sixteen patients (20.0%) expressed possible Ceppellini effect reactivity. Most importantly, 51.25 percent of the patients who presented with weakly reactive D typing results by MDA testing on the NEO (≤1+) or Echo (≤1+) had RHD allelic variants that were associated with the potential for anti-D alloimmunization. Laboratories that use MDA testing on the Neo or Echo for D typing should consider that female patients of childbearing age might be at risk of anti-D alloimmunization if they are classified as D+ based on weakly reactive D typing results. Some individuals are at risk of anti-D alloimmunization if they inherit D antigens that are qualitatively and/or quantitatively different than wild-type D. We hypothesized that patients who showed serologically inconsistent, weak, or historically discordant D typing results by microplate direct agglutination (MDA) on NEO or Echo (Immucor, Norcross, GA) might be at risk of carrying RHD allelic variants. The present study was designed to evaluate patients with RHD allelic variants if they presented with weakly reactive D typing results on the NEO or Echo. Patients were selected for RHD genotyping if their specimens showed weak reactivity with either series 4 or series 5 anti-D typing reagent, if the strength of reactivity was ≤1+ on the NEO or Echo, or if historical or current D typing results were discordant with current results. Patients selected for RHD genotyping were also tested by saline tube testing using the same anti-D series 4 and 5 reagents. Genotyping was performed by the Immucor genotyping laboratory in Warren, NJ. Of 80 patients whose samples met study inclusion, 52 (65.0%) were found to have RHD allelic variants. Sixteen patients (20.0%) expressed possible Ceppellini effect reactivity. Most importantly, 51.25 percent of the patients who presented with weakly reactive D typing results by MDA testing on the NEO (≤1+) or Echo (≤1+) had RHD allelic variants that were associated with the potential for anti-D alloimmunization. Laboratories that use MDA testing on the Neo or Echo for D typing should consider that female patients of childbearing age might be at risk of anti-D alloimmunization if they are classified as D+ based on weakly reactive D typing results.

Impact of RHD genotyping on transfusion practice in Denmark and the United States and identification of novel RHD alleles

BACKGROUND

Reduced D antigen on red blood cells (RBCs) may be due to "partial" D phenotypes associated with loss of epitope(s) and risk for alloimmunization or "weak" D phenotypes that do not lack major epitopes with absence of clinical complications. Genotyping of samples with weak and discrepant D typing is recommended to guide transfusion and RhIG prophylaxis. The goal was to compare the impact of RHD genotyping on transfusion practice in two centers serving different populations.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Fifty-seven samples from Denmark and 353 from the United States with weak or discrepant D typing were genotyped. RBC typing was by multiple methods and reagents. DNA isolated from white blood cells was tested with RBC-Ready Gene D weak or CDE in Denmark or RHD BeadChip in the United States. RHD was sequenced for those unresolved.

RESULTS

Of Caucasian samples from Denmark, 90% (n = 51) had weak D types 1, 2, or 3; two had other weak D, two partial D, and two new alleles. In diverse ethnic U.S. samples, 44% (n = 155) had weak D types 1, 2, or 3 and 56% (n = 198) had other alleles: uncommon weak D (n = 13), weak 4.0 (n = 62), partial D (n = 107), no RHD (n = 9), and new alleles (n = 7).

CONCLUSION

Most samples with weak or variable D typing from Denmark had alleles without risk for anti-D. In U.S. samples, 48% could safely be treated as D+, 18% may require consideration if pregnancy possible, and 34% could potentially benefit from being treated as D-. Black and multiracial ethnicities were overrepresented relative to population.

Molecular and computational analysis of 45 samples with a serologic weak D phenotype detected among 132,479 blood donors in northeast China

Background

RH1 is one of the most clinically important blood group antigens in the field of transfusion and in the prevention of fetal incompatibility. The molecular analysis and characterization of serologic weak D phenotypes is essential to ensuring transfusion safety.

Methods

Blood samples from a northeastern Chinese population were randomly screened for a serologic weak D phenotype. The nucleotide sequences of all 10 exons, adjacent flanking intronic regions, and partial 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs) were detected for RHD genes. Predicted deleterious structural changes in missense mutations of serologicl weak D phenotypes were analyzed using SIFT, PROVEAN and PolyPhen2 software. The protein structure of serologic weak D phenotypes was predicted using Swiss-PdbViewer 4.0.1.

Results

A serologic weak D phenotype was found in 45 individuals (0.03%) among 132,479 blood donors. Seventeen distinct RHD mutation alleles were detected, with 11 weak D, four partial D and two DEL alleles. Further analyses resulted in the identification of two novel alleles (RHD weak D 1102A and 399C). The prediction of a three-dimensional structure showed that the protein conformation was disrupted in 16 serologic weak D phenotypes.

Conclusions

Two novel and 15 rare RHD alleles were identified. Weak D type 15, DVI Type 3, and RHD1227A were the most prevalent D variant alleles in a northeastern Chinese population. Although the frequencies of the D variant alleles presented herein were low, their phenotypic and genotypic descriptions add to the repertoire of reported RHD alleles. Bioinformatics analysis on RhD protein can give us more interpretation of missense variants of RHD gene.

Characterization of RHD alleles present in serologically RHD-negative donors determined by a sensitive microplate technique

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Weak D phenotypes with very low antigen densities and DEL phenotype may not be detected in RhD typing routine and could be typed as D-negative, leading to D alloimmunization of D-negative recipients. The present study aimed to investigate the presence of RHD-positive genotypes in blood donors typed as D-negative by an automated system using the solid-phase methodology as a confirmatory test.

METHODS

Two screenings were performed in different selected donor populations. For the first screening, we selected 1403 blood donor samples typed as D-negative regardless of the CE status, and in the second screening, we selected 517 donor samples typed as D-negative C+ and/or E+. RhD typing was performed by microplate in an automated equipment (Neo-Immucor®), and the confirmatory test was performed by solid-phase technique using Capture R® technology. A multiplex PCR specific to RHD and RHDψ was performed in a pool of 6 DNA samples. Sequencing of RHD exons was performed in all RHD-positive samples, and a specific PCR was used to identify the D-CE(4-7)-D hybrid gene.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

No weak D type was found in either screening populations. Additionally, 353 (18·4%) D-negative samples presented previously reported non-functional RHD genes, 2 samples had a DEL allele, and 6 samples demonstrated new alleles, including one novel DEL allele. Our study identified six new RHD alleles and showed that the inclusion of a confirmatory test using serological methodology with high sensitivity can reduce the frequency of weak D samples typed as D-negative.

Frequency and characterization of RHD variants in serologically D- Surinamese pregnant women and D- newborns

BACKGROUND

Numerous RHD variant genes affect the expression of D on the red blood cell surface. In Suriname, 4.3% of pregnant women were D-, ranging from virtually zero to 7% among ethnic groups. Characterization of RHD variants, which are associated with a variable potential to induce anti-D, is of practical clinical importance especially in case of limited access to preventive measures. Here we report on the occurrence of RHD variant genes in Surinamese serologically D- pregnant women and their D- newborns from different ethnic groups.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The RheSuN study is a cross-sectional cohort study in D- pregnant women and their newborns, who visited hospitals in Paramaribo, Suriname, during routine pregnancy care. The presence of RHD variants was investigated using quantitative polymerase chain reaction targeting RHD Exons 5 and 7 and RH-multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.

RESULTS

Seven RHD variant genes were detected in 35 of 84 women and four RHD variant genes in 15 of 36 newborns. The RHD*03 N.01 and RHD*08 N.01 variants represented 87% of a total of 62 variant genes. Variants were comparably frequent among ethnicities. In four cases genotyping would have changed anti-D prophylaxis policy: one woman with a RHD*01EL.01 variant, not associated with anti-D formation and three D- newborns with RHD*09.01 and RHD*09.03.01 variants, potentially capable of inducing anti-D.

CONCLUSION

RHD variants at risk for anti-D are common among serologic D- individuals from African descent in Suriname. While genotyping D- women has limited added value, it may be considered in newborns from D- women.

Molecular matching for patients with haematological diseases expressing altered RHD-RHCE genotypes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The high homology and the inverted orientation of RHD and RHCE may give rise to non-functional and aberrant RH alleles. RH genotyping is used to screen RH matched donors to African descent patients. This study aimed to define a strategy for testing RHD and RHCE variants in blood donors to provide compatible units for transfusion of patients with haematological diseases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Samples from 132 patients [101 Sickle cell disease (SCD), 14 myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), 17 acute myelogenous leukaemia (AML)] and 198 Brazilian donors were studied. Major blood group alleles, RHD, RHCE alleles and RHD zygosity were determined by the blood-MLPA assay. Sequencing was performed to determine RHD and RHCE variant subtypes. A match was an RH genotype that did not encode Rh antigens absent in the patient, along with matching for ABO, MNS, KEL, FY, JK and DI antigens.

RESULTS

Overall, 7·6% of blood donors and 17.4% of patients presented RH genotypes that predict expression of partial Rh antigens or lack of high prevalence Rh antigens. From 23 patients with clinically relevant RH genotypes, 15 had available matched donors.

CONCLUSION

We report the presence of clinically relevant RH genotypes in SCD and in non-SCD patients. In our admixed population, many patients carry variant RHCE alleles in heterozygosity with normal RHCE alleles. Thus, our results suggest that donors could be selected based on the normal RH allele.

Two large deletions extending beyond either end of the RHD gene and their red cell phenotypes

Only two partial deletions longer than 655 nucleotides had been reported for the RHD gene, constrained within the gene and causing DEL phenotypes. Using a combination of quantitative PCR and long-range PCR, we examined three distinct deletions affecting parts of the RHD gene in three blood donors. Their RHD nucleotide sequences and exact boundaries of the breakpoint regions were determined. DEL phenotypes were caused by a novel 18.4 kb deletion and a previously published 5.4 kb deletion of the RHD gene; a D-negative phenotype was caused by a novel 7.6 kb deletion. Examination of the deletion-flanking regions suggested microhomology-mediated end-joining, replication slippage, and non-homologous end-joining, respectively, as the most likely mechanisms for the three distinct deletions. We described two new deletions affecting parts of the RHD gene, much longer than any previously reported partial deletion: one was the first deletion observed at the 5' end of the RHD gene extending into the intergenic region, and the other the second deletion observed at its 3' end. Large deletions present at either end are a mechanism for a much reduced RhD protein expression or its complete loss. Exact molecular characterization of such deletions is instrumental for accurate RHD genotyping.

Serological weak D phenotypes: a review and guidance for interpreting the RhD blood type using the RHD genotype

Approximately 0·2-1% of routine RhD blood typings result in a "serological weak D phenotype." For more than 50 years, serological weak D phenotypes have been managed by policies to protect RhD-negative women of child-bearing potential from exposure to weak D antigens. Typically, blood donors with a serological weak D phenotype have been managed as RhD-positive, in contrast to transfusion recipients and pregnant women, who have been managed as RhD-negative. Most serological weak D phenotypes in Caucasians express molecularly defined weak D types 1, 2 or 3 and can be managed safely as RhD-positive, eliminating unnecessary injections of Rh immune globulin and conserving limited supplies of RhD-negative RBCs. If laboratories in the UK, Ireland and other European countries validated the use of potent anti-D reagents to result in weak D types 1, 2 and 3 typing initially as RhD-positive, such laboratory results would not require further testing. When serological weak D phenotypes are detected, laboratories should complete RhD testing by determining RHD genotypes (internally or by referral). Individuals with a serological weak D phenotype should be managed as RhD-positive or RhD-negative, according to their RHD genotype.

Red cell genotyping precision medicine: a conference summary

This review summarizes the salient points of the symposium 'Red Cell Genotyping 2015: Precision Medicine' held on 10 September 2015 in the Masur Auditorium of the National Institutes of Health. The specific aims of this 6th annual symposium were to: (1) discuss how advances in molecular immunohematology are changing patient care; (2) exemplify patient care strategies by case reports (clinical vignettes); (3) review the basic molecular studies and their current implications in clinical practice; (4) identify red cell genotyping strategies to prevent alloimmunization; and (5) compare and contrast future options of red cell genotyping in precision transfusion medicine. This symposium summary captured the state of the art of red cell genotyping and its contribution to the practice of precision medicine.

RHD alleles among pregnant women with serologic discrepant weak D phenotypes from a multiethnic population and risk of alloimmunization

BACKGROUND

A considerable number of RHD alleles responsible for weak and partial D phenotypes have been identified. Serologic determination of these phenotypes is often doubtful and makes genetic analysis of RHD gene highly desirable in transfusion recipients and pregnant women. We analyzed the RHD gene in a cohort of pregnant women with doubtful D phenotypes.

METHODS

RHD genotyping was performed on 104 cases with D typing discrepancies or with history of serologic weak D phenotype. Laboratory-developed DNA tests, RHD BeadChip (Bioarray Solutions, Immucor), and sequencing were used to identify the RHD alleles.

RESULTS

Molecular analyses showed 23 of 104 (22%) pregnant women were RHD*weak D types 1, 2, or 3 and not at risk for anti-D. Fifty-one (49%) were RHD*weak partial 4.0, 6 RHD*weak D type 38 (6%), 1 RHD*weak D type 45 (1%), 1 RHD*weak D type 67 (1%), and potentially at risk for being alloimmunized and making anti-D. Partial D was identified in 22 of 104 (21%) patients and definitively at risk for anti-D.

DISCUSSION

Appropriate classification of RhD phenotypes is recommended for correct indication of RhIG in pregnant women. However, the serologic distinction between RhD-negative and RhD-positive phenotypes is a difficult task in the case of D variants due to the variations in serologic testing. Our results show a great variability in RHD variant alleles in pregnant women from this population of high admixture. According to these results, 78% of these obstetric patients are at risk for anti-D and candidates for RhIG.

The DAU cluster: a comparative analysis of 18 RHD alleles, some forming partial D antigens

BACKGROUND

The Rh system is the most complex and polymorphic blood group system in humans with more than 460 alleles known for the RHD gene. The DAU cluster of RHD alleles is characterized by the single-nucleotide change producing the p.Thr379Met amino acid substitution. It is called the DAU-0 allele and has been postulated to be the primordial allele, from which all other alleles of the DAU cluster have eventually evolved.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

For two novel DAU alleles, the nucleotide sequences of all 10 exons as well as adjacent intronic regions, including the 5' and 3' untranslated regions (UTR), were determined for the RHD and RHCE genes. A phylogenetic tree for all DAU alleles was established using the neighbor-joining method with Pan troglodytes as root. Standard hemagglutination and flow cytometry tests were performed.

RESULTS

We characterized two DAU alleles, DAU-11 and DAU-5.1, closely related to DAU-3 and DAU-5, respectively. A phylogenetic analysis of the 18 known DAU alleles indicated point mutations and interallelic recombination contributing to diversification of the DAU cluster.

CONCLUSIONS

The DAU alleles encode a group of RhD protein variants, some forming partial D antigens known to permit anti-D in carriers; all are expected to cause anti-D alloimmunization in recipients of red blood cell transfusions. The DAU alleles evolved through genomic point mutations and recombination. These results suggest that the cluster of DAU alleles represent a clade, which is concordant with our previous postulate that they derived from the primordial DAU-0 allele.

Clinically relevant RHD-CE genotypes in patients with sickle cell disease and in African Brazilian donors

BACKGROUND

As a consequence of the homology and opposite orientation of RHD and RHCE, numerous gene rearrangements have occurred in Africans and resulted in altered RH alleles that predict partial antigens, contributing to the high rate of Rh alloimmunisation among patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). In this study, we characterised variant RH alleles encoding partial antigens and/or lacking high prevalence antigens in patients with SCD and in African Brazilian donors, in order to support antigen-matched blood for transfusion.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

RH genotypes were determined in 168 DNA samples from SCD patients and 280 DNA samples from African Brazilian donors. Laboratory developed tests, RHD BeadChip(TM), RHCE BeadChip(TM), cloning and sequencing were used to determine RHD-CE genotypes among patients and African Brazilian blood donors.

RESULTS

The distributions of RHD and RHCE alleles in donors and patients were similar. We found RHCE variant alleles inherited with altered RHD alleles in 25 out of 168 patients (15%) and in 22 out of 280 (7.8%) African Brazilian donors. The RHD and RHCE allele combinations found in the population studied were: RHD*DAR with RHCE*ceAR; RHD*weak D type 4.2.2 with RHCE*ceAR, RHD*weak D type 4.0 with RHCE*ceVS.01 and RHCE*ceVS.02; RHD*DIIIa with RHCE*ceVS.02. Thirteen patients and six donors had RHD-CE genotypes with homozygous or compound heterozygous alleles predicting partial antigens and/or lacking high prevalence antigens. Eleven patients were alloimmunised to Rh antigens. For six patients with RHD-CE genotypes predicting partial antigens, no donors with similar genotypes were found.

DISCUSSION

Knowledge of the distribution and prevalence of RH alleles in patients with SCD and donors of African origin may be important for implementing a programme for RH genotype matching in SCD patients with RH variant alleles and clinically significant Rh antibodies.

Variant RHD Types in Brazilians With Discrepancies in RhD Typing

BACKGROUND

The knowledge of D variants in patients and donors is important because anti-D alloimmunization can occur in some but not all individuals who express a variant RHD allele. Serologic distinction of RhD discrepancies is not always straightforward, which makes molecular analysis highly desirable.

METHODS

A group of 223 subjects, 129 patients, and 94 blood donors was identified and analyzed on the basis of a D typing discrepancy. The D antigen expression was evaluated by tube and gel hemagglutination with four anti-D reagents. PCR-single specific primer (SSP), multiplex PCR, RHD BeadChip (Immucor), or sequencing were used for molecular analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 168/223 (75%) weak D and 55/223 (25%) partial D variants were identified. Hemagglutination results varied in methods and anti-D reagents used in this process. There was no standard serologic reactivity identified, which could predict what type of D variant would be identified. Among weak D samples, types 1-3 were the most common, while DAR and DVI were most prevalent among partial D samples.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that discrepancies found in the serologic typing should be investigated by molecular methods in order to determine the D variant involved and also to distinguish between weak D and partial D. The knowledge of the distribution of weak D types and partial D among populations is important for D- patients and pregnant women management.

Advances in Blood Typing

The clinical importance of blood group antigens relates to their ability to evoke immune antibodies that are capable of causing hemolysis. The most important antigens for safe transfusion are ABO and D (Rh), and typing for these antigens is routinely performed for patients awaiting transfusion, prenatal patients, and blood donors. Typing for other blood group antigens, typically of the Kell, Duffy, Kidd, and MNS blood groups, is sometimes necessary, for patients who have, or are likely to develop antibodies to these antigens. The most commonly used typing method is serological typing, based on hemagglutination reactions against specific antisera. This method is generally reliable and practical for routine use, but it has certain drawbacks. In recent years, molecular typing has emerged as an alternative or supplemental typing method. It is based on detecting the polymorphisms and mutations that control the expression of blood group antigens, and using this information to predict the probable antigen type. Molecular typing methods are useful when traditional serological typing methods cannot be used, as when a patient has been transfused and the sample is contaminated with red blood cells from the transfused blood component. Moreover, molecular typing methods can precisely identify clinically significant variant antigens that cannot be distinguished by serological typing; this capability has been exploited for the resolution of typing discrepancies and shows promise for the improved transfusion management of patients with sickle cell anemia. Despite its advantages, molecular typing has certain limitations, and it should be used in conjunction with serological methods.

Analysis of false-positive results of fetal RHD typing in a national screening program reveals vanishing twins as potential cause for discrepancy

OBJECTIVES

We aim to elucidate causes of false-positive fetal RHD screening results obtained with cell-free DNA.

METHODS

Fetal RHD screening was performed in 32,222 samples from RhD-negative women by multiplex real-time PCR in triplicate for RHD exons 5 and 7 using cell-free DNA isolated from maternal plasma obtained in the 27th gestational week. PCR results were compared with cord blood serology in 25,789 pregnancies (80.04%). False-positive cases were analyzed. Known biological causes (RHD variant genes), technical causes of discordance, and errors around blood sampling were investigated with leukocyte DNA from maternal and cord blood, and cell-free DNA from stored maternal plasma.

RESULTS

Not only RHD but also Y-chromosome (DYS14) sequences were present in four plasma samples from RHD-negative women bearing an RHD-negative girl. Sample mix-up and other sampling errors could be excluded in three samples.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that false-positive fetal RHD screening results can be caused by cell-free DNA fragments in maternal plasma derived from a third cell line that is not representative for either the maternal genome or the genome of the vital fetus. We propose that remaining (cyto)trophoblasts of a vanishing twin are the underlying mechanism, and we estimate a frequency of this phenomenon of 0.6%.

Serologic findings of RhD alleles in Egyptians and their clinical implications

INTRODUCTION

Serologic discrepancies caused by various reactivity of D variants can only be resolved by the use of RhD genotyping. However, this strategy cannot be applied routinely due to the cost and feasibility. It has been documented that D variants are demonstrated among individuals with positivity for at least C or E antigens. It is considered to be affordable for some countries to test D negative donors who are C or E positive for D variants. It was proposed that an algorithm could be found based on distinct serologic features that matches the Egyptian genetic frequency data, and correctly assigns donors and patients, using the least possible expenses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Samples with the most prevalent weak D and partial D were investigated for their RhCE phenotype. Routine D typing by immediate spin (IS) tube method was performed in parallel with an automated gel test, and the reactivity results of D variants with both techniques were compared.

RESULTS

Among 31 D variants, only 5 were C or E positive (16.1 %). R0r phenotype was associated with the remaining 26 samples (83.9%) and constituted weak D types 4.2 (38.5%), and 4.0/4.1 (11.5%), partial DIII (34.6%), and partial DV (15.4%). Gel reacted strongly with partial DIII and DV. Ten samples with DIII and DV typed as D positive with IS. All weak D were positive by indirect antiglobulin test (IAT), while all partial D were positive by gel and IAT.

CONCLUSION

Guidelines for RhD workup should be adjusted to match population data. Detection of D variants among C or E positive donors may not be an optimal strategy for Egyptians. Serology cannot discriminate weak D from partial D, but may provide a clue about the probable D variant to be tested molecularly with the appropriate kit. Reagent selection is important to correctly assign donors and patients with the DIII and DV types.

Policies and procedures related to testing for weak D phenotypes and administration of Rh immune globulin: results and recommendations related to supplemental questions in the Comprehensive Transfusion Medicine survey of the College of American Pathologists

CONTEXT

Advances in RHD genotyping offer an opportunity to update policies and practices for testing weak D phenotypes and administration of Rh immune globulin to postpartum women.

OBJECTIVES

To repeat questions from a 1999 College of American Pathologists proficiency test survey, to evaluate current practices for testing for weak D and administration of Rh immune globulin, and to determine whether there is an opportunity to begin integrating RHD genotyping in laboratory practice.

DESIGN

The College of American Pathologists Transfusion Medicine Resource Committee sent questions from the 1999 survey to laboratories that participated in the 2012 proficiency test survey. The results of the 2012 survey were compared with those from 1999. Results from published RHD genotyping studies were analyzed to determine if RHD genotyping could improve current policies and practices for serological Rh typing.

RESULTS

More than 3100 survey participants responded to the 2012 questions. The most significant finding was a decrease in the number of transfusion services performing a serological weak D test on patients as a strategy to manage those with a weak D as Rh negative (from 58.2% to 19.8%, P < .001). Data from RHD genotyping studies indicate that approximately 95% of women with a serological weak D could be managed safely and more logically as Rh positive.

CONCLUSIONS

Selective integration of RHD genotyping policies and practices could improve the accuracy of Rh typing results, reduce unnecessary administration of Rh immune globulin in women with a weak D, and decrease transfusion of Rh-negative red blood cells in most recipients with a serological weak D phenotype.

A case of high-titer anti-D hemolytic disease of the newborn in which late onset and mild course is associated with the D variant, RHD-CE(9)-D

BACKGROUND

The RhD antigen is very immunogenic and is a significant cause of hemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN). The RHD-CE(8-9)-D hybrid allele is commonly associated with a D- phenotype. Here, we report a case of high-titer maternal anti-D and late onset of HDN in a newborn carrying a RHD-CE(9)-D variant supposedly encoding the same partial D antigen as the RHD-CE(8-9)-D allele, but with significant expression of D antigen.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

To elucidate the blood group antigen background of the case, we carried out serologic, flow cytometric, and genetics studies of the newborn and his father.

CONCLUSION

Individuals carrying the RHD-CE(9)-D allele do express D antigen, but do so at significantly lower levels than those carrying the more common D+ phenotypes (e.g., DCe/dce). It may mitigate and delay otherwise severe HDN in pregnancies complicated by high-titer anti-D.

D category IV: a group of clinically relevant and phylogenetically diverse partial D

BACKGROUND

The D typing strategies in several European countries protect carriers of D category VI (DVI) from anti-D immunization but not carriers of other partial D. Besides DVI, one of the clinically most important partial D is D category IV (DIV). A detailed description and direct comparison of the different DIV types was missing.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

RHD nucleotide sequences were determined from genomic DNA. D epitope patterns were established with commercial monoclonal anti-D panels.

RESULTS

DIV comprises several variants of the D antigen with distinct serology, molecular structures, evolutionary origins, and ethnic prevalences. The DIV phenotype is determined by 350H shared by all, but not limited to, DIV variants which are further divided into DIVa and DIVb. The DIVa phenotype is expressed by DIV Type 1.0 harboring 350H and the dispersed amino acids 62F, 137V, and 152T. The DIVb phenotype is expressed by DIV Type 3 to Type 5 representing RHD-CE-D hybrids. Four of the six postulated DIV variants were encountered among 23 DIV samples analyzed. Of 12 DIV carriers with anti-D, 10 were female and seven likely immunized by pregnancy. Two DIV-related alleles are newly described: DWN, which differs from DIV Type 4 by 350D and epitope pattern. DNT carries 152T, known to cause a large D antigen density.

CONCLUSION

DIV alleles arose from at least two independent evolutionary events. DIV Type 1.0 with DIVa phenotype belongs to the oldest extant human RHD alleles. DIV Type 2 to Type 5 with DIVb phenotype arose from more recent gene conversions. Anti-D immunization, especially dreaded in pregnancies, will be avoided not only in carriers of DVI but also in carriers of other D variants like DIV, if our proposed D typing strategy is adopted.

RHD variants in Polish blood donors routinely typed as D-

BACKGROUND

Blood donors exhibiting a weak D or DEL phenotypical expression may be mistyped D- by standard serology hence permitting incompatible transfusion to D- recipients. Molecular methods may overcome these technical limits. Our aim was to estimate the frequency of RHD alleles among the apparently D- Polish donor population and to characterize its molecular background.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Plasma pools collected from 31,200 consecutive Polish donors typed as D- were tested by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the presence of RHD-specific markers located in Intron 4 and Exons 7 and 10. RHD+ individuals were characterized by PCR or cDNA sequencing and serology.

RESULTS

Plasma cross-pool strategy revealed 63 RHD+ donors harboring RHD*01N.03 (n = 17), RHD*15 (n = 12), RHD*11 (n = 7), RHD*DEL8 (n = 3), RHD*01W.2 (n = 3), RHD-CE(10) (n = 3), RHD*01W.3, RHD*01W.9, RHD*01N.05, RHD*01N.07, RHD*01N.23, and RHD(IVS1-29G>C) and two novel alleles, RHD*(767C>G) (n = 3) and RHD*(1029C>A). Among 47 cases available for serology, 27 were shown to express the D antigen

CONCLUSION

1) Plasma cross-pool strategy is a reliable and cost-effective tool for RHD screening. 2) Only 0.2% of D- Polish donors carry some fragments of the RHD gene; all of them were C or E+. 3) Almost 60% of the detected RHD alleles may be potentially immunogenic when transfused to a D- recipient.