Outcomes of ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients on chronic hemodialysis

Clinical Outcomes of Intracardiac Echocardiography-Guided Contrast Agent-Free Cryoballoon Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Renal Insufficiency

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Previous studies have reported an association between impaired renal function and poor outcomes after radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, outcomes of cryoballoon ablation (CBA) in patients with renal insufficiency are not fully elucidated. This study aimed to compare outcomes of CBA in AF patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) versus those without CKD and to assess changes in renal function over 12 months following CBA.

METHODS

A total of 839 patients (65.1% with non-paroxysmal AF [PAF]) who underwent de novo CBA were prospectively enrolled. We divided patients into two groups based on creatinine clearance rate (CCr) and performed intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)-guided contrast agent-free CBA.

RESULTS

In comparison with patients without CKD (CCr >50, n=722), those with CKD (CCr ≤50, n=117) were older and predominantly female, had a lower body mass index, and showed a higher prevalence of heart failure and hypertension. Mean CHA2DS2-VAS score was significantly higher in CKD group than in non-CKD group. Procedure-related complications were not significantly different between two groups. During a mean follow-up period of 25.4±11.9 months, clinical recurrence occurred in 182 patients (21.7%) and not significantly different between two groups. In multivariate analysis, non-PAF and left atrial size were independent predictors of AF recurrence. CCr levels significantly improved over 12 months after CBA in CKD group.

CONCLUSIONS

ICE-guided contrast-agent-free CBA showed comparable long-term clinical outcomes without increasing procedure-related complications and improvement of renal function over 12 months following CBA in AF patients with CKD.

Improvement in Quality of Life via Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis Therapy

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in hemodialysis patients

INTRODUCTION

Little evidence exists regarding cryoballoon ablation (CBA) of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) in hemodialysis (HD) patients. We compared CBA and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of PAF in HD patients, referring to CBA of PAF in non-HD patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This historical cohort study examined 88 patients who underwent catheter ablation of PAF, including 21 HD patients with a second-generation 28-mm cryoballoon (CB-HD group), 17 HD patients with a non-force-sensing radiofrequency catheter (RF-HD group), and 50 non-HD patients with a cryoballoon (CB-non-HD group). Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation alone aside from cavotricuspid isthmus ablation was performed in 14 (67%) in the CB-HD group, 12 (71%) in the RF-HD group, and 36 (72%) in the CB-non-HD group (P = 0.95), without isoproterenol-induced non-PV triggers. Non-PV trigger ablation was added to the other patients. The Kaplan-Meier estimated 1-year freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence without antiarrhythmic drugs after a single procedure was 76%, 59%, and, 92% in the CB-HD, RF-HD, and CB-non-HD groups, respectively (P = 0.002). The mean procedure time was shorter in the CB-HD group than in the RF-HD group (127 vs. 199 min; P < 0.001). In the second procedure, the median number of reconnected pulmonary veins was 0.5 in the CB-HD group versus 2.0 in the RF-HD group (P = 0.17).

CONCLUSION

For PAF in HD patients, CBA showed a comparable single-procedure efficacy to that of RFA with a short procedure time. CBA may be a reasonable initial procedure for HD patients suffering from symptomatic PAF.

Understanding and Managing Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Kidney Disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is on the rise due to the increased rate of related comorbidities such as diabetes and hypertension. Patients with CKD are at higher risk of cardiovascular events and atrial fibrillation is more common in this patient population. It is estimated that the prevalence of chronic atrial fibrillation in patients with CKD is two to three times higher than general population. Furthermore, patients with CKD are less likely to stay in sinus rhythm. Atrial fibrillation presents a major burden in this population due to difficult treatment decisions in the setting of a lack of evidence from randomized clinical trials. Patients with CKD have higher risk of stroke with more than half having a CHADS2 score ≥ 2. Anticoagulation have been shown to significantly decrease embolic stroke risk, however bleeding complications such as hemorrhagic stroke is twofold higher with warfarin. Although newer novel anticoagulation drugs have shown promise with lower intracranial hemorrhage risk in comparison to warfarin, lack clinical trial data in CKD and the unavailability of an antidote remains an issue. In this review, we discuss the treatment options available including anticoagulation and the evidence behind them in patients with chronic kidney disease suffering from atrial fibrillation.

The impact of haemodialysis on the outcomes of catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

AIMS

The outcomes of catheter ablation (CA) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) who are undergoing haemodialysis (HD) have not been fully elucidated. This study aimed to determine the impact of HD on CA outcome in these patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We examined 1364 consecutive PAF patients (mean age, 61 ± 10 years) who underwent CA, including 32 (2.3%) patients undergoing HD. The patients undergoing HD had a significantly lower body mass index (P < 0.0001), higher CHADS2 score (P = 0.006), and higher prevalence of structural heart disease (P < 0.0001), hypertension (P = 0.002), and congestive heart failure (P = 0.02). Echocardiography indicated a larger left atrial diameter (P < 0.0001) and left ventricular diameter (P = 0.0002) in the HD patients. Haemodialysis was a significant predictor of AF recurrence (hazard ratio 2.56; 95% confidence interval 1.56-4.03; P = 0.0004) in the overall population. Sinus rhythm maintenance rates in the HD patients at 1, 3, and 5 years were 42.3, 37.6, and 19.7%, respectively, after the first procedure, and 64.7, 54.9, and 47.1%, respectively, after the final procedure (median, 2; range, 1-2 procedures); these rates were significantly lower than those in the non-HD patients (P < 0.0001). The 5-year survival rate was 78.1% in the HD patients.

CONCLUSION

Haemodialysis was significantly associated with AF recurrence after CA for PAF. However, an ∼50% success rate for sinus rhythm maintenance without antiarrhythmic drug therapy in HD patients suggested that CA could be an option for the treatment of AF.

Management of atrial fibrillation in chronic kidney disease: double trouble

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has a very well-established link with cardiovascular disease. Below stage 3 CKD (glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min), there is a progressive increase in both total mortality and cardiovascular-specific mortality as kidney function declines; indeed, it is more likely for a patient with CKD stage 3 to die of cardiovascular disease than to progress to CKD stage 4 and beyond. Arrhythmia is particularly common in patients with CKD. Depending on the study and measurement used, the prevalence of patients with CKD with chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) is quoted at 7% to 18%, rising to 12% to 25% for those older than 70 years. These rates are up to 2 to 3 times higher than in the general population. Of all patients with AF, 10% to 15% will have CKD. However, not all standard rate and rhythm methods are suitable for this population and those that are tend to be less effective. Meanwhile, anticoagulation has long been a thorny subject, with much conflicting evidence around the balance between bleeding and stroke risk. To help clarify this, we first highlight the challenges of performing evidence-based medicine in the patient with renal disease, and then review recent and emerging research to suggest an approach to the management of patients with renal disease who have AF. We also review the potential role of the different new oral anticoagulant drugs in CKD.