Once-daily therapy for H. pylori infection: a randomized comparison of four regimens

Azithromycin-containing versus standard triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: A meta-analysis

AIM: To evaluate whether adding azithromycin to first-line Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) eradication improved eradication and reduced side effects.

METHODS: Eligible articles were identified by searches of electronic databases. We included all randomized trials that compared azithromycin-containing with standard triple-therapy regimens for first-line treatment of H pylori infection. Statistical analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.0.10. Sub-analyses were also performed.

RESULTS: We identified 14 randomized trials (1431 patients). Pooled H pylori eradication rates were 72.01% (95% CI: 58.09%-85.93%) and 69.78% (95% CI: 66.47%-73.09%) for patients with or without azithromycin by intention-to-treat analysis, and the odds ratio (OR) was 1.17 (95% CI: 0.64-2.14). The occurrence of side effects differed significantly and was 15.81% (95% CI: 12.50%-19.12%) and 25.20% (95% CI: 21.44%-28.96%) for treatment with or without azithromycin, respectively, and the summary OR was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.41-0.82). Furthermore, the azithromycin-containing group had a lower occurrence of diarrhea, nausea and taste disturbance.

CONCLUSION: Our review suggests that azithromycin-containing triple-therapy regimens could be equally effective in eradication of H pylori compared with standard first-line triple-therapy regimens.

Azithromycin in one week quadruple therapy for H pylori eradication in Iran

AIM: To investigate eradication rates, patient compliance and tolerability of a 1-wk Azithromycin-based quadruple therapy versus the 2-wk conventional therapy.

METHODS: A total of 129 H pylori-positive patients were randomized to either omeprazole 20 mg, bismuth subcitrate 240 mg, azithromycin 250 mg, and metronidazole 500 mg, all twice daily for 1-wk (B-OAzM) or omeprazole 20 mg, bismuth subcitrate 240 mg, amoxicillin 1g, and metronidazole 500 mg all twice daily for 2-wk (B-OAM). H pylori infection was defined at entry by histology and rapid urease test and cure of infection was determined by negative urea breath test.

RESULTS: H pylori eradication rates produced by B-OAzM and B-OAM were 74.1% and 70.4% respectively based on an intention to treat analysis, and 78.1% versus 75.7% respectively based on a per-protocol analysis. The incidence of poor compliance was lower, although not significantly so, in patients randomized to B-OAzM than for B-OAM (3.5% versus 4.3%) but intolerability was similar in the two groups ( 35% versus 33.3%).

CONCLUSION: 1-wk azithromycin based quadruple regimen achieves an H pylori eradication rate comparable to that of standard 2-wk quadruple therapy, and is associated with comparable patient compliance and complications.

Clarithromycin extended-release in community-acquired respiratory tract infections

Clarithromycin extended-release (ER) is a second-generation macrolide with bactericidal activity against a broad group of pathogens. It allows for convenient once-daily dosing (2 x 500 mg/day), and has less severe adverse effects than the immediate-release (IR) formulation of the drug, which may result in improved patient compliance. Clarithromycin ER has been approved for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, acute maxillary sinusitis and acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis. In comparison to the IR formulation, clarithromycin ER demonstrates prolonged absorption from the gastrointestinal tract, allowing for once-daily dosing with improved gastrointestinal tolerability. Various double-blind, randomised clinical trials and group studies have found clarithromycin ER to be an efficacious treatment option, comparable with clarithromycin IR, or its other competitors.

Helicobacter pylori eradication using tetracycline and furazolidone versus amoxicillin and azithromycin in lansoprazole based triple therapy: an open randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Optimal anti-Helicobacter pylori treatment has not yet been established.

AIM

To evaluate H. pylori eradication using tetracycline and furazolidone versus amoxicillin and azithromycin in lansoprazole based triple therapy in northeastern of Brazil.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and four patients with H. pylori infection, as determined by rapid urease testing and histology, were randomly assigned to receive either: lansoprazole (30 mg q.d.), tetracycline (500 mg q.i.d.), and furazolidone (200 mg t.i.d.) for 7 days (LTF; n = 52); or lansoprazole (30 mg b.i.d.) and amoxicillin (1 g b.i.d.) for 1 week, plus azithromycin (500 mg q.d.) for the first 3 days (LAAz; n = 52). H. pylori eradication was assessed 3 months following completion of therapy by means of rapid urease testing, histology and a 14C-urea breath test.

RESULTS

H. pylori eradication was achieved in 46 of 52 (88.4%, 95% CI: 77.5%-95.1%) patients in LTF group and in 14 of 52 (26.9%, 95% CI: 16.2%-40,1%) patients in LAAz group. On a per-protocol analysis, eradication rates were 91.8% (95% CI: 81.4%-97.3%) and 28.5% (95% CI: 17.2%-42.3%), respectively in LTF and LAAz groups.

CONCLUSION

The LAAz regimen yielded unacceptably low eradication rates. On the other hand, the LTF scheme represents a suitable alternative for H. pylori eradication.

One-week once-daily triple therapy with esomeprazole, levofloxacin and azithromycin compared to a standard therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication

BACKGROUND

Primary antibiotic-resistance and poor compliance are the main causes of Helicobacter pylori eradication failure of standard regimens.

AIM

To investigate eradication rate, patient compliance and tolerability of a 1-week once-daily levofloxacin plus azithromycin triple therapy versus the standard twice-daily triple therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 164 H. pylori-positive patients were randomised to either esomeprazole 20mg, levofloxacin 500 mg and azithromycin 500 mg once-daily (ELAz) or esomeprazole 20mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and amoxycillin 1g twice-daily (ECA) for 1 week. H. pylori infection was defined at entry by histology and urea breath test; cure of infection was determined both by negative urea breath test and H. pylori stool antigens.

RESULTS

H. pylori eradication rates of ELAz and ECA were similar at intention-to-treat (both 65%) and per-protocol analyses (70% versus 76%, respectively). Incidence of poor compliance was lower, although not significantly, in patients randomised to ELAz than to ECA (4% versus 10%); tolerability was significantly higher for ELAz than for ECA (88% versus 70%; P=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily levofloxacin plus azithromycin-based triple therapy achieves an H. pylori eradication rate comparable to that of standard twice-daily triple therapy, but is associated with higher patient compliance and might even be better tolerated.

Helicobacter pylori eradication and peptic ulcer healing: the impact of deleting the proton pump inhibitor and using a once-daily treatment

AIM

To compare cheaper and simpler once-daily regimens, with and without a proton pump inhibitor, with standard, twice-daily, triple therapy.

METHODS

A randomized, placebo-controlled, treatment trial in Vietnam allocated 296 Helicobacter pylori-infected patients with peptic ulcer of >or= 5 mm to one of three regimens: (i) twice-daily: lansoprazole 30 mg, clarithromycin 250 mg and tinidazole 500 mg; (ii) once-daily: lansoprazole 60 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and tinidazole 1000 mg; (iii) once-daily: placebo, clarithromycin 500 mg and tinidazole 1000 mg. H. pylori status was assessed by culture and immunoblot, ulcer healing by endoscopy and side-effects by structured questionnaires.

RESULTS

Per protocol eradication (N = 256) was higher with standard therapy (87%) than with once-daily therapy (72%), and both were better than once-daily therapy without proton pump inhibitor (39%). Per protocol ulcer healing after standard therapy (83%) was not significantly better than that after once-daily therapy (73%), but better than that after therapy without proton pump inhibitor (65%). Side-effects were reported at similar rates in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Proton pump inhibitor was needed for optimal eradication and ulcer healing. Twice-daily administration showed improved success rates when compared with once-daily therapies. Peptic ulcer healing was achieved even in patients treated with antibiotics only, confirming the central role of H. pylori in the pathophysiology of peptic ulcer disease.

Omeprazole plus azithromycin and either amoxicillin or tinidazole for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection

GOALS

To establish whether omeprazole plus azithromycin in association with either amoxicillin or tinidazole is effective in curing Helicobacter pylori infection in dyspeptic patients.

BACKGROUND

Many antibiotics in combination with antisecretory drugs have been used in an attempt to find the optimal regimen for eradication of H. pylori. Azithromycin is a macrolide that achieves high concentrations in gastric tissue after a single 500-mg oral dose.

STUDY

A total of 160 consecutive symptomatic patients with H. pylori received omeprazole 20 mg twice daily for 1 week, azithromycin 500 mg/d for 3 days, and were randomly assigned to either amoxicillin 1 g twice daily (OAzAm group, n = 80) for 1 week or tinidazole 500 mg twice daily for 3 days (OAzT group, n = 80). H. pylori status was assessed by rapid urease test and histology at entry and by histology and (13)C-urea breath test after the end of the therapy.

RESULTS

H. pylori was eradicated in 62.5% of patients in the OAzAm group (intention to treat [ITT] 62.5%) and in 71.2% of patients in the OAzT group (ITT 71.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the compliance was excellent and the side effects negligible, the regimens used were partially effective for the eradication of H. pylori.

Once-daily, low-cost, highly effective Helicobacter pylori treatment to family members of gastric cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori eradication in family members of gastric cancer patients is now widely accepted, although problems related to costs and compliance persist.

AIM

To compare the efficacy, tolerability and long-term re-infection rates of two once-daily regimens for the eradication of H. pylori in family members of gastric cancer patients.

METHODS

106 first-degree family members of gastric cancer patients were recruited and submitted to the 13C-urea breath test (UBT) to detect H. pylori. If positive, they were randomly allocated to receive a combination of lanzoprazole 30 mg, clarithromycin OD (extended-release formulation) 500 mg and furazolidone 400 mg, once daily, in the morning, for 7 days (Group A) or the same regimen with only 200 mg furazolidone (Group B). Eradication was confirmed by urea breath test performed 6 weeks after treatment. 13C-urea breath test was repeated at 944 (784-1258) days after treatment in successfully treated participants to look for re-infection.

RESULTS

Twenty-five participants were H. pylori negative and two H. pylori-positive individuals refused to sign the informed consent and were excluded. Therefore, 79 participants were studied. Forty participants were allocated to Group A and 39 to Group B. All participants completed treatment. Adverse effects, mostly mild, were observed in 18% of Group A and 18% of Group B (N.S.). The intention-to-treat eradication rate was 87.5% in Group A and 61.5% in Group B (P = 0.006). The mean annual re-infection rate was 3%.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of lanzoprazole 30 mg, one tablet of clarithromycin OD (extended release formulation) 500 mg and furazolidone 400 mg, once daily for 7 days, constitutes an inexpensive, safe and effective alternative for anti-H. pylori therapy in family members of gastric cancer patients.