Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: high mortality rates in hospitalized patients

A retrospective study of outcomes and the validation of the Sheffield Gastrostomy Score in PEGs, RIGs and PIGs

INTRODUCTION

There are limited studies comparing the safety and effectiveness of Radiologically Assisted Gastrostomies (RAGs) against Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomies (PEGs). The Sheffield Gastrostomy Score (SGS) can be used to help predict 30-day mortality, more information is needed on its validity in RAGs. Our aim is to compare mortality between RAGs (Radiologically Inserted Gastrostomies (RIGs) and Per-oral Image Guided Gastrostomies (PIGs)) with PEGs and validate the SGS.

METHOD

Data on gastrostomies newly inserted in three hospitals from 2016-2019 were retrospectively collected. Demographics, indication, insertion date, date of death, inpatient status and blood tests (albumin, CRP and eGFR) were recorded.

RESULTS

1977 gastrostomies were performed: Gastrostomy mortality at 7 days was 1.3% and at 30 days was 6%. There was a 5% 30-day mortality for PEGs, 5.5% RIGs, 7.2% PIGs (p = 0.215). Factors increasing 30 day mortality were age ≥60 years (p = 0.039), albumin <35 g/L (p = 0.005), albumin <25 g/L (p < 0.001) and CRP ≥10 mg/L (p < 0.001). For patients who died within 30 days; 0.6% had an SGS of 0, 3.7% = 1, 10.2% = 2 and 25.5% = 3, with similar trends for RAGs and PEGs. ROC curves showed the area under the curve for all gastrostomies, RAGs and PEGs as 0.743, 0.738, 0.787 respectively.

DISCUSSION

There was no significant difference between 30-day mortality for PEGs, RIGs and PIGs. Factors predicting risk include age ≥60 years, albumin <35 g/L, albumin <25 g/L and CRP ≥10 mg/L. The SGS has been validated in this study for PEGs and for the first time in RAGs as well..

Outcomes of PEG placement by acute care surgeons compared to those placed by gastroenterology

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes are placed by gastroenterologists (GI) and surgeons throughout the country. At Rhode Island Hospital, before July of 2017, all PEGs were placed by GI. In July of 2017, in response to a growing need for PEGs, acute care surgeons (ACS) also began performing PEGs at the bedside in ICUs. The purpose of this study was to review and compare outcomes of PEG tubes placed by ACS and GI.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of patients who received a PEG placed by ACS or GI at the bedside in any ICU from December 2016 to September 2019. Charts were reviewed for the following outcomes: Success rates of placing PEG, duration of procedure, major complications, and death. Secondary outcomes included discharge disposition, and rates of comfort measures only after PEG.

RESULTS

In 2017, 75% of PEGs were placed by GI and 25% surgery. In 2018, 47% were placed by GI and 53% by surgery. In 2019, 33% were placed by GI and 67% by surgery. There was no significant difference in success rates between surgery (146/156 93.6%) and GI (173/185 93.5%) (p 0.97). On average, GI performed the procedure faster than surgery [Median 10 (7-16) min vs 16 (13-21) mins, respectively, p < 0.001]. There were no significant differences between groups in any of the PEG outcomes or complications investigated.

CONCLUSION

Bedside PEG tube placement appears to be a safe procedure in the ICU population. GI and Surgery had nearly identical success rates in placing PEGs. GI performed the procedure faster than surgery. There were no significant differences in the reviewed patient outcomes or complications between PEGs placed by ACS or GI. Of note, when a complication occurred, ACS PEG patients typically were managed in the OR while GI tended to re-PEG patients highlighting a potential difference in management that should be further investigated.

Predicting 30-day mortality following PEG insertion: External validation of the Sheffield Gastrostomy Score and analysis for additional predictors

BACKGROUND

and study aims: The Sheffield Gastrostomy Score (SGS) was devised to stratify patients by calculating their risk of mortality at 30 days following PEG insertion. The aim was to externally validate the SGS and identify any further predictors of 30-day mortality.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective review of all PEG insertions performed over a ten year period in our centre. All patients who had a new PEG inserted were identified and the SGS calculated. Additionally, demographic, indication for PEG insertion and other blood results were recorded. Receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated and subsequent univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to identify additional risk factors for 30 day mortality.

RESULTS

The PEG database comprised 1373 patients, of which 808 were suitable for analysis. For each increasing SGS gradation mortality rose, with 4% of those scoring 0 compared to 50% scoring 3. An area under the ROC curve of 0.69 (95% confidence interval 0.64-0.74) indicated good discriminative capacity. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age ≥60 years (OR = 2.1 p = 0.016), serum albumin concentrations of 25-34 g/l (OR = 2.5 p = 0.001) or <25 g/l (OR = 6.8 p < 0.001), C-Reactive Protein ≥10 mg/l (OR = 2.7 p = 0.009) and lymphocyte count of <1.5 × 10⁹/l (OR = 2.0 p = 0.004) increased the odds of 30-day mortality, whilst referral for PEG placement whilst an inpatient decreased the risk of death (OR = 0.53 p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

The SGS displayed reasonable predictive ability but the area under the curve is not high enough for routine clinical use. Modelling of further predictors from a multicentre study could provide scope for updating the SGS potentially improving patient selection.

Procedure-Related Complications and Survival after Gastrostomy: Results from a Japanese Cohort

INTRODUCTION

In 2010, a large-scale multi-institutional study in Japan showed a good prognosis for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). However, the function and efficacy of PEG are not fully understood by patients, families, and health-care professionals; thus, the number of PEG treatments in Japan has declined. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the safety of the PEG procedure and subsequent survival after PEG.

METHODS

In total, 249 PEGs were performed at Juzenkai Hospital from 2005 to 2017. PEG was originally performed using the pull method and then by a modified introducer method from mid-2011. We examined procedure-related complications and survival rates after PEG.

RESULTS

Fifty-one (20.5%) procedure-related complications occurred; emergency surgery was required in 4 cases. Infections accounted for 76.5% (39/51) of complications. More infections occurred with the pull method than with the modified introducer method. The 1-year survival rate was 66.8%; the median survival time was 678 days. Nine patients (3.6%) died within 30 days; no deaths were directly related to PEG. Sex, age, and albumin level before surgery significantly influenced the prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Due to changes in the PEG insertion method and other factors, PEG has become a safer treatment method. Additionally, PEG-based nutritional supplementation is associated with adequate survival.

Pneumoperitoneum and PEG Dislodgement Secondary to Noninvasive Ventilation after PEG Tube Placement

We present a previously undescribed complication after noninvasive ventilation (NIV) for respiratory failure in a patient who required percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement for long-term nutrition after a complicated coronary bypass operation. A 54-year-old female diagnosed with unilateral vocal cord paralysis after emergent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) underwent an uncomplicated PEG tube placement. She was placed on intermittent NIV because of respiratory failure 24 hours after PEG placement, and NIV was continued for several days. Three days later, she was noted to have pneumoperitoneum on an upright chest X-ray. Abdominal CT scan revealed a large amount of pneumoperitoneum with the PEG tube in the correct position and no extravasation of enteric contrast from the stomach. Tube feeds were held and NIV was discontinued. Nonetheless, six days later, the patient was found on CT scan to have partial displacement of the PEG tube with leakage from the gastrotomy requiring operative repair. This case highlights the vulnerability of PEG tubes to management practices in the early postoperative period. Abdominal distention secondaryto NIV likely caused pressure necrosis of the PEG site with dislodgement of the tube. This case elicits considerations regarding future management practices of patients receiving NIV in the early postoperative period after PEG placement.

First Documented Case of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) Tube-Associated Bacterial Peritonitis due to Achromobacter Species with Literature Review

Introduction. Achromobacter species (spp.) peritonitis has seldom been identified in medical literature. Scarce cases of Achromobacter peritonitis described previously have been correlated with peritoneal dialysis and more sparingly with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. Achromobacter exhibits intrinsic and acquired resistance, especially in chronic infections, to most antibiotics. This article conducts a literature review of all previously reported Achromobacter spp. peritonitis and describes the first reported case of Achromobacter peritonitis as a complication of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement. Discussion. Achromobacter peritonitis as a complication of PEG-tube placement has not been previously reported. In our patients' case, the recently placed PEG-tube with ascitic fluid leakage was identified as the most plausible infection source. Although a rare bacterial peritonitis pathogen, Achromobacter may be associated with wide antimicrobial resistance and unfavorable outcomes. Conclusion. No current guidelines provide significant guidance on treatment of PEG-tube peritonitis regardless of microbial etiology. Infectious Disease Society of America identifies various broad-spectrum antibiotics targeting nosocomial intra-abdominal coverage; some of these antimicrobial selections (such as cefepime and metronidazole combination) may yet be inadequate for widely resistant Achromobacter spp. Recognizably, the common antibiotics utilized for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, i.e., third generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones, to which Achromobacter is resistant and variably susceptible, respectively, would be extensively insufficient. Piperacillin/tazobactam (P/T) and carbapenem were identified to provide the most reliable coverage in vitro; clinically, 5 out of the 8 patients who received either P/T or a carbapenem, or both, eventually experienced clinical improvement.

RISK FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH EARLY MORTALITY AFTER PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY IN PATIENTS AT A TERTIARY CARE CENTER IN BRAZIL: A RETROSPECTIVE SINGLE-CENTER SURVIVAL STUDY

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the main accepted method for long-term tube feeding.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the risk factors associated with early mortality after PEG.

METHODS

Retrospective survival analysis in a tertiary-level center in Recife, Brazil. We reviewed the medical records of 150 patients with PEG placement. The data were analysed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox proportional regression models were also built to test the effects of PEG on mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 150 patients who submitted to PEG were studied (70 male). Of the participants, 87 (58%) had blood hypertension; 51 (34%) patients had diabetes; 6 (4%) patients had chronic renal disease; and 6 (4%) had malignancy. Chronic neurodegenerative diseases were the more common clinical indication for PEG. The 30-day and 60-day proportional mortality probability rates were 11.05% and 15.34% respectively. A multivariate Cox proportional regression model, haemoglobin (HR 4.39, 95%CI 1.30-14.81, P=0.017) and pre-procedure UCI staying (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50-0.87, P=0.004) were significant predictors of early mortality.A haemoglobin cut-off value of 10.05 g/dL was shown to have a sensibility of 82.6% (61.2% to 95% CI) and an acceptable sensitivity of 59.0 (50.6% to68.6% CI), and a likelihood ratio of 2.06 for eight weeks mortality.

CONCLUSION

In patients who had been subjected to the PEG procedure for long-term nutrition, low haemoglobin, pre-procedure intensive care unit internment or both are associated with the risk of early mortality.

Percutaneous endoscopic versus radiologic gastrostomy for enteral feeding: a retrospective analysis on outcomes and complications

Background and study aims  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy (PRG) are techniques used for long-term enteral feeding. Our primary aim was to analyze procedure-related and 30-day mortality and complications between PEG and PRG in relation to indications. Patients and methods  A single-center retrospective analysis was performed thath included all adult patients receiving initial PEG (January 2008 until April 2016) and PRG (January 2010 until April 2016). Outcomes were mortality (procedure-related, 30-day), complications (early (≤ 30 days) and late) and success rates. Results  A total of 760 procedures (469 PRG and 291 PEG) were analyzed. Most common indications were head and neck cancer (HNC), cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Success rates for placement were 91.2 % for PEG and 97.1 % for PRG ( P  = 0.001). Procedure-related mortality was 1.7 % in PEG and 0.4 % in PRG ( P  = 0.113). The 30-day mortality was 10.7 % in PEG and 5.1 % in PRG ( P  = 0.481 after multivariate logistic regression) CVA was associated with higher 30-day mortality, whereas ALS, higher body weight, and prophylactic placements in HNC were associated with lower rates. Tube-related complications were less frequent in PEG, both early (2.7 % vs. 26.4 %, P  ≤ 0.001) and late (8.6 % vs. 31.5 %, P  ≤ 0.001). The percentage of major complications and infections did not differ. Conclusions  With respect to procedure-related and 30-day mortality, PEG and PRG compare equally. PRG had a higher procedural success rate. Tube-related complications and pain are less frequent after PEG compared to PRG. The choice for either PEG or PRG therefore should primarily be based on local facilities and expertise.

Prospective implementation of algorithmic patient selection for gastrostomy tube placement consultations: a pre- and post-intervention analysis

Background: Studies have shown high but variable mortality following gastrostomy tube (GT) placement. There are no standard practice guidelines for GT placement.

Aim: To evaluate if implementation of patient selection and prognosis algorithms for GT insertion has favorable effects on patient outcomes.

Methods: This was a pre-, post-cohort analysis in a Veterans Affairs hospital. We implemented a patient selection algorithm aided by the Sheffield Gastrostomy Scoring System (SGSS) in July 2015. We reviewed all referrals to the inpatient service for a GT between July 2014 and June 2016 (pre-, post- implementation), and collected albumin and SGSS at time of consultation, date of GT insertion, and outcomes including vital status and albumin 30 days post-consultation. Patients were followed until 30 October 2016. We compared outcomes pre- and post-implementation.

Results: A total of 126 referrals were reviewed, 68 pre- and 58 post-algorithm implementation. Seventy-seven GTs were placed; 58 (75.3%) fulfilled the algorithm-appropriate indications. The mean SGSS was significantly lower among patients in whom GT was placed for algorithm-appropriate indications 2.03 (SD =0.86) vs inappropriate indications (2.59, SD =0.63; p<0.001). Sixty-five (51.6%) patients died by conclusion of study. Thirty day mortality after GT placement was 26.2% (post- (22.4%) vs pre- (29.4%)). Changes in serum albumin at day 30 was non-significant.

Conclusion The use of algorithm guidance by the prospective use of the SGSS was associated with a higher likelihood of GT placement both overall and for algorithm-appropriate indications.

Nosocomial Infections among Patients with Intracranial Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Data Analysis of Predictors and Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Intracranial hemorrhage is a critical medical emergency. Nosocomial infections may promote worse outcomes in these vulnerable patients. This study investigated microbial features, predictors, and clinical outcomes of nosocomial infections among patients with multiple subtypes of intracranial hemorrhage.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients that were hospitalized with intracranial hemorrhage between January 2015 and October 2018, and divided them into two groups based on the development of nosocomial infection. Within the cohort of patients with nosocomial infections, microbiology and resistance patterns were established across multiple sites of infection. Moreover, consequences of nosocomial infection such as mortality and length of hospital stay were determined.

RESULTS

A total of 233 cases were identified that met our inclusion and exclusion criteria out of which were 94 cases of nosocomial infection (40.3%) versus 139 cases with no nosocomial infection (59.7%). The most common infections were pneumonia, urinary tract infections, and bacteremia. Resistance accounted for 70.2% of cultures. Multivariable analysis revealed significant association of nosocomial infections with hypertension (OR: 2.62, 95% CI: 1.11-6.16, p = 0.027), hospital LOS (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.05-1.12, p < 0.001), levetiracetam (OR: 3.6, 95% CI: 1.41-0.922, p = 0.007), and GCS category (OR: 5.42, 95% CI: 1.67-17.55, p = 0.005 and OR: 7.63, 95% CI: 2.44-23.87, p < 0.001 for moderate and severe, respectively). Patients with nosocomial infections witnessed a significant increase in the length of hospital stay (23 versus 8 hospital days, p < 0.001). This finding was significant across most types of brain hemorrhage. Mortality was significantly associated with GCS category (OR: 10.1, 95% CI: 4-25.7, p < 0.001) and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube insertion (OR: 19.6, 95% CI: 4.1-91, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively, these findings suggest that nosocomial infections are common among patients with intracranial hemorrhage and can be predictable by considering certain risk factors. Future studies are warranted to evaluate the efficacy of implementing infection control strategies or protocols on these patients to achieve better therapeutic outcomes.

Evaluation of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia in Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy: Stratification Risk of Pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Aspiration pneumonia is the most common cause of death in patients who undergo percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). This study aims to evaluate the severity of oropharyngeal dysphagia and predict the risk of pneumonia in such patients, using upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

METHODS

Endoscope examined the pharyngolaryngeal region in patients who underwent PEG. The severity of oropharyngeal dysphagia was evaluated according to the amount and location of pooling of secretions in the pharyngolaryngeal region. Overall, 55 patients showed absent or minimal amount of secretions (control group), 10 patients showed moderate-to-large amounts of secretions filling the pyriform sinus (pharyngeal group), and 23 patients showed secretions entering the laryngeal vestibule (laryngeal group). Demographic data, swallowing level scale, and occurrence of pneumonia were recorded.

RESULTS

The incidence of pneumonia was the highest in the pharyngeal group (70.0%), followed by that in the laryngeal (60.9%) and control groups (30.9%; P = 0.010). Multivariable regression showed that risk of pneumonia was significantly higher in the pharyngeal and laryngeal groups. Cumulative incidence rate of pneumonia was significantly higher in the laryngeal and pharyngeal groups than in the control group (log-rank test, P = 0.001). Mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with suboptimal protective cough reflex than in others (50.0% vs 5.9%, P = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

Accumulation of abnormal amounts of secretions in the pyriform sinus or in the laryngeal vestibule increased the risk of the hospital admission following pneumonia in patients who underwent PEG. The mortality rate was higher in patients with suboptimal protective cough reflex.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for enteral nutrition: a 5-year clinical experience with 324 patients

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is considered the route of choice for long-term enteral nutrition. In this study, we evaluated the short term outcomes of PEG and aimed to identify the risk factors for in-hospital mortality as well as adverse events such as aspiration pneumonia.

METHODS

Three hundred and twenty-four patients who received PEG for enteral nutrition between January 2007 and December 2011 were included in this study. Data regarding baseline characteristics, preoperative biomarkers and clinical outcomes were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

The average patient age was 82.3±10.9 (SD) years old. 149 patients (46%) were men and 199 patients (61%) had stroke as a comorbidity. Postoperatively, feeding-related aspiration pneumonia was observed in 72 patients (22%), diarrhea in 40 patients (12%) and peristomal infection in 34 patients (11%). The average postoperative length of stay was 34.6 days. 51 patients (16%) died before discharge, 22 (6.8%) of them within 30 days after PEG. Two deaths (0.6%) were considered procedure-related (bleeding). Multivariate analysis revealed the male gender, lower serum albumin levels and higher blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels as significant prognostic factors for in-hospital mortality. Higher C-reactive protein levels and BUN levels were found to be independently associated with the occurrence of postoperative aspiration pneumonia.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience reconfirmed PEG as a minimally invasive and safe procedure for long-term enteral nutrition in patients with impaired oral intake. However, significant prognostic factors should be taken into account during the preoperative evaluation of patients. Deferral of procedure or specialized postoperative care may be indicated in high risk patients.

ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition and dehydration are widespread in older people, and obesity is an increasing problem. In clinical practice, it is often unclear which strategies are suitable and effective in counteracting these key health threats.

AIM

To provide evidence-based recommendations for clinical nutrition and hydration in older persons in order to prevent and/or treat malnutrition and dehydration. Further, to address whether weight-reducing interventions are appropriate for overweight or obese older persons.

METHODS

This guideline was developed according to the standard operating procedure for ESPEN guidelines and consensus papers. A systematic literature search for systematic reviews and primary studies was performed based on 33 clinical questions in PICO format. Existing evidence was graded according to the SIGN grading system. Recommendations were developed and agreed in a multistage consensus process.

RESULTS

We provide eighty-two evidence-based recommendations for nutritional care in older persons, covering four main topics: Basic questions and general principles, recommendations for older persons with malnutrition or at risk of malnutrition, recommendations for older patients with specific diseases, and recommendations to prevent, identify and treat dehydration. Overall, we recommend that all older persons shall routinely be screened for malnutrition in order to identify an existing risk early. Oral nutrition can be supported by nursing interventions, education, nutritional counseling, food modification and oral nutritional supplements. Enteral nutrition should be initiated if oral, and parenteral if enteral nutrition is insufficient or impossible and the general prognosis is altogether favorable. Dietary restrictions should generally be avoided, and weight-reducing diets shall only be considered in obese older persons with weight-related health problems and combined with physical exercise. All older persons should be considered to be at risk of low-intake dehydration and encouraged to consume adequate amounts of drinks. Generally, interventions shall be individualized, comprehensive and part of a multimodal and multidisciplinary team approach.

CONCLUSION

A range of effective interventions is available to support adequate nutrition and hydration in older persons in order to maintain or improve nutritional status and improve clinical course and quality of life. These interventions should be implemented in clinical practice and routinely used.

High C-Reactive Protein and Low Albumin Levels Predict High 30-Day Mortality in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrotomy

Background

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrotomy (PEG) enables long-term enteral feeding. The aim of this study was to identify biomarkers that may guide the decision of whether to perform the elective procedure of PEG.

Methods

The medical records of all patients who underwent PEG in our hospital from 2010 to 2016 were screened retrospectively. Patients with mortality within a 30-day follow-up period and those without were compared using the Chi-square test, and continuous variables were compared with the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to demonstrate the ability of biomarkers to predict mortality; a cut-off point was determined and its sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. The Youden index was used to determine the cut-off point. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to identify PEG-related mortality risk factors and a Cox regression model was applied for risk characterization.

Results

A total of 120 patients who underwent PEG were evaluated in the study. The mean age was 67.00 ± 18.00 years. The most common indication for PEG was cerebrovascular disease, in 69 (57.5%) of the patients. Infection of the PEG site was most common within 14 days after PEG tube placement, occurring in 13 patients (10.3%). The mortality rate among patients with post-PEG infection was 68.2%, significantly higher than in patients without infection (P = 0.012). Thirty-four patients (28.3%) died within 30 days of undergoing PEG. CRP values ≥ 78.31 mg/L increased mortality by 8.756-fold, and albumin levels < 2.71 g/dL increased mortality by 2.255-fold.

Conclusion

Our results indicate that the presence of both high CRP level and low albumin level were associated with significantly higher rate of mortality (73.1%) in patients who underwent PEG.

Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) Placement in the Overweight and Obese Patient

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement in the obese patient has been considered a relative contraindication due to the impedance of gastric transillumination and inability to approximate the abdominal and gastric wall. The aim of this study was to determine the overall success rate, morbidity, and PEG-related mortality in overweight and obese patients.

METHODS

Three hundred fifty-five consecutive patients were retrospectively evaluated over a 1-year period at the Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center for postprocedure-related PEG and PEG/jejunostomy (J) complications. One hundred thirty-four patients were considered overweight (body mass index [BMI] > or = 27 kg/m(2)). Of those, 80 patients were found to be obese (BMI > or = 30 kg/m(2)) with a BMI ranging 30-63 kg/m(2).

RESULTS

Gastrostomy placement was successful in 130 of 134 (97%) overweight patients (p < .05). The overall procedure-related mortality was 0%. The rate of significant complications in overweight and obese patients remained 0% when compared with those patients with a normal BMI. Out of 355 patients, 14 failed to receive a PEG; 3 of these were obese and 1 was overweight. These 4 procedures were aborted due to a paucity of anatomical landmarks and failure to transilluminate the abdominal wall.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that PEG placement in the overweight and obese patient can be a technically safe procedure according to our success rate of 100%, with a procedure-related mortality rate of 0%. In those overweight and obese patients who require specialized long-term enteral nutrition support, PEG placement should be considered earlier and more frequently.

European Society for Swallowing Disorders - European Union Geriatric Medicine Society white paper: oropharyngeal dysphagia as a geriatric syndrome

This position document has been developed by the Dysphagia Working Group, a committee of members from the European Society for Swallowing Disorders and the European Union Geriatric Medicine Society, and invited experts. It consists of 12 sections that cover all aspects of clinical management of oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) related to geriatric medicine and discusses prevalence, quality of life, and legal and ethical issues, as well as health economics and social burden. OD constitutes impaired or uncomfortable transit of food or liquids from the oral cavity to the esophagus, and it is included in the World Health Organization's classification of diseases. It can cause severe complications such as malnutrition, dehydration, respiratory infections, aspiration pneumonia, and increased readmissions, institutionalization, and morbimortality. OD is a prevalent and serious problem among all phenotypes of older patients as oropharyngeal swallow response is impaired in older people and can cause aspiration. Despite its prevalence and severity, OD is still underdiagnosed and untreated in many medical centers. There are several validated clinical and instrumental methods (videofluoroscopy and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing) to diagnose OD, and treatment is mainly based on compensatory measures, although new treatments to stimulate the oropharyngeal swallow response are under research. OD matches the definition of a geriatric syndrome as it is highly prevalent among older people, is caused by multiple factors, is associated with several comorbidities and poor prognosis, and needs a multidimensional approach to be treated. OD should be given more importance and attention and thus be included in all standard screening protocols, treated, and regularly monitored to prevent its main complications. More research is needed to develop and standardize new treatments and management protocols for older patients with OD, which is a challenging mission for our societies.

European Society for Swallowing Disorders - European Union Geriatric Medicine Society white paper: oropharyngeal dysphagia as a geriatric syndrome

This position document has been developed by the Dysphagia Working Group, a committee of members from the European Society for Swallowing Disorders and the European Union Geriatric Medicine Society, and invited experts. It consists of 12 sections that cover all aspects of clinical management of oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) related to geriatric medicine and discusses prevalence, quality of life, and legal and ethical issues, as well as health economics and social burden. OD constitutes impaired or uncomfortable transit of food or liquids from the oral cavity to the esophagus, and it is included in the World Health Organization's classification of diseases. It can cause severe complications such as malnutrition, dehydration, respiratory infections, aspiration pneumonia, and increased readmissions, institutionalization, and morbimortality. OD is a prevalent and serious problem among all phenotypes of older patients as oropharyngeal swallow response is impaired in older people and can cause aspiration. Despite its prevalence and severity, OD is still underdiagnosed and untreated in many medical centers. There are several validated clinical and instrumental methods (videofluoroscopy and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing) to diagnose OD, and treatment is mainly based on compensatory measures, although new treatments to stimulate the oropharyngeal swallow response are under research. OD matches the definition of a geriatric syndrome as it is highly prevalent among older people, is caused by multiple factors, is associated with several comorbidities and poor prognosis, and needs a multidimensional approach to be treated. OD should be given more importance and attention and thus be included in all standard screening protocols, treated, and regularly monitored to prevent its main complications. More research is needed to develop and standardize new treatments and management protocols for older patients with OD, which is a challenging mission for our societies.

Is tube feeding futile in advanced dementia?

It is controversial whether tube feeding in people with dementia improves nutritional status or prolongs survival. Guidelines published by several professional societies cite observational studies that have shown no benefit and conclude that tube feeding in patients with advanced dementia should be avoided. However, all studies on tube feeding in dementia have major methodological flaws that invalidate their findings. The present evidence is not sufficient to justify general guidelines. Patients with advanced dementia represent a very heterogeneous group, and evidence demonstrates that some patients with dementia benefit from tube feeding. However, presently available guidelines make a single recommendation against tube feeding for all patients. Clinicians, patients, and surrogates should be aware that the guidelines and prior commentary on this topic tend both to overestimate the strength of evidence for futility and to exaggerate the burdens of tube feeding. Shared decision making requires accurate information tailored to the individual patient's particular situation, not blanket guidelines based on flawed data. Lay Summary: Many doctors believe that tube feeding does not help people with advanced dementia. Scientific studies suggest that people with dementia who have feeding tubes do not live longer or gain weight compared with those who are carefully hand fed. However, these studies are not very helpful because of flaws in design, which are discussed in this article. Guidelines from professional societies make a blanket recommendation against feeding tubes for anyone with dementia, but an individual approach that takes each person's situation into account seems more appropriate. Patients and surrogates should be aware that the guidelines on this topic tend both to underestimate the benefit and exaggerate the burdens of tube feeding.

CIRSE Standards of Practice Guidelines on Gastrostomy

PURPOSE

Surgical Gastrostomy has been around since the 19th century but in 1980 the first successful percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy was reported. A year later the first successful percutaneous gastrostomy was performed using fluoroscopic guidance. The technique for percutaneous insertion and the equipment used has been refined since then and it is now considered the gold standard for gastrostomy insertion. Here we present guidelines for image-guided enteral feeding tubes in adults.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

We performed a review and analysis of the scientific literature, other national and international guidelines and expert opinion.

RESULTS

Studies have shown fluoroscopic techniques have consistently higher success rates with lower rates of major complications than endoscopic techniques. However, the Achilles' heel of many fluoroscopic techniques is the requirement for smaller gastrostomy tube sizes resulting in them being more prone to blockages and thus requiring further intervention.

CONCLUSION

Radiological feeding tube insertion is a safe and effective procedure. Success rates are higher, and complication rates lower than PEG or surgical gastrostomy tube placement and innovative techniques for gastric and jejunal access mean that there are very few cases in which RIG is not possible. The principal weakness of radiologically inserted gastrostomies is the limitiation on tube size which leads to a higher rate of tube blockage. Per-oral image-guided gastrostomies have to an extent addressed this but have not been popularised. Currently many centres still consider endoscopic gastrostomies as the first line unless patients are too unwell to undergo this procedure or previous attempts have failed, in which case radioloically inserted gastrostomies are the technique of choice.

ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in dementia

BACKGROUND

Older people suffering from dementia are at increased risk of malnutrition due to various nutritional problems, and the question arises which interventions are effective in maintaining adequate nutritional intake and nutritional status in the course of the disease. It is of further interest whether supplementation of energy and/or specific nutrients is able to prevent further cognitive decline or even correct cognitive impairment, and in which situations artificial nutritional support is justified.

OBJECTIVE

It is the purpose of these guidelines to cover these issues with evidence-based recommendations.

METHODS

The guidelines were developed by an international multidisciplinary working group in accordance with officially accepted standards. The GRADE system was used for assigning strength of evidence. Recommendations were discussed, submitted to Delphi rounds and accepted in an online survey among ESPEN members.

RESULTS

26 recommendations for nutritional care of older persons with dementia are given. In every person with dementia, screening for malnutrition and close monitoring of body weight are recommended. In all stages of the disease, oral nutrition may be supported by provision of adequate, attractive food in a pleasant environment, by adequate nursing support and elimination of potential causes of malnutrition. Supplementation of single nutrients is not recommended unless there is a sign of deficiency. Oral nutritional supplements are recommended to improve nutritional status but not to correct cognitive impairment or prevent cognitive decline. Artificial nutrition is suggested in patients with mild or moderate dementia for a limited period of time to overcome a crisis situation with markedly insufficient oral intake, if low nutritional intake is predominantly caused by a potentially reversible condition, but not in patients with severe dementia or in the terminal phase of life.

CONCLUSION

Nutritional care and support should be an integral part of dementia management. In all stages of the disease, the decision for or against nutritional interventions should be made on an individual basis after carefully balancing expected benefit and potential burden, taking the (assumed) patient will and general prognosis into account.

Meningitis Due to Enterobacter aerogenes Subsequent to Resection of Acoustic Neuroma and Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement: A Rare Nosocomial Event

We present a case of meningitis after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement subsequent to acoustic neuroma resection and cranioplasty. Four days following PEG tube placement the patient developed Enterobacter aerogenes meningitis, requiring explantation of infected cranioplasty material. His condition subsequently improved. Etiology and future intervention strategies are discussed (Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003;24:780-782).

Proton pump inhibitor use before percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is associated with adverse outcomes

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Knowledge of the risk factors associated with adverse outcomes after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) may be helpful for developing PEG recommendations. The purpose of this study was to identify the clinical risk factors associated with adverse clinical outcomes after PEG, especially regarding the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data from PEG patients at seven university hospitals between June 2006 and January 2012. All patients were followed up through February 2012 after PEG, and the clinical risk factors for adverse clinical outcomes after PEG were analyzed.

RESULTS

Data from 1,021 PEG patients were analyzed. PPI users were more frequently included in the complication group than the noncomplication group (p=0.040). PEG-related complications (p=0.040) and mortality (p=0.003) were more frequent in the PPI group than in the control group. In the subgroup analysis of complicated PEG cases, infectious complications were more frequently found in the PPI group than in the control group (35.8% vs 27.8%). After adjustment for multiple possible confounding factors, PPI users (odds ratio, 1.531; 95% confidence interval, 1.017 to 2.305) and diabetic patients had increased mortality after PEG.

CONCLUSIONS

PPI use may be associated with adverse outcomes in patients with PEG; however, further prospective studies investigating this issue are warranted.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) site infections: a clinical and microbiological study from university teaching hospital, India

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is used to provide enteral access in patients who are unable to swallow. Infection of the stoma is an important complication and there is little data from India on this problem, which can be used to inform infection prevention and prophylactic strategies.

AIM

The objective was to assess the prevalence and the role of contributory factors in PEG site infections.

METHODS

A total of 173 patients underwent PEG insertion from January 2011 to May 2012. Clinical and microbiological data were collected for culture-positive cases. Insertion was performed using a standard sterile pull-through technique. Infections were defined as two of: peristomal erythema, induration, and purulent discharge.

RESULTS

A total of 54 PEG infections occurred in 43 patients (28.85%). Seventy-seven organisms were isolated. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common (n=29) followed by coliforms (n=21) and meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (n=6). Thirty-one (72%) received amoxicillin-clavulanic acid as prophylaxis and 12 (28%) were receiving concomitant antibiotics for their underlying conditions. The occurrence of PEG site infections was statistically independent of the administered prophylactic antibiotics (p=0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

This study has demonstrated the importance of PEG sites as a cause of healthcare associated infections. Educating patients on wound care practices would play a significant role in prevention of PEG site infections.

Is short-term percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement beneficial in acutely ill cognitively intact elderly patients? A proposed decision-making algorithm

AIM

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube is an important method of enteral feeding for patients who require temporary or long-term artificial nutritional support to prevent or correct disease-related malnutrition. However, there is paucity of data on the utility of short-term PEG tube placements in acute illnesses in cognitively intact older adults.

METHODS

We present a series of seven, cognitively intact patients (age range 72-93 years), who had PEG tubes placed for short periods. These patients were diagnosed with "failure to thrive" and were managed by placing a PEG tube temporarily for nutritional management. None of these patients had terminal illness or hospice eligibility, and all of the patients were community dwellers.

RESULTS

All of the elderly patients experienced good outcomes in terms of their functional status and nutritional support.

CONCLUSIONS

Our series clearly supports the notion that short-term PEG tube placement in cognitively intact elderly patients could be a successful strategy to support them during an episode of acute illness, and to improve their nutritional deficits and survival.

Prevalence and in-hospital mortality of gastrostomy and jejunostomy in Japan: a retrospective study with a national administrative database

BACKGROUND

PEG is widely used; however, large-scale data for PEG have been lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the prevalence of placement of gastrostomy and jejunostomy tubes and to elucidate the patient background characteristics and their associations with in-hospital mortality.

DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of the Japanese administrative claims database.

SETTING

Japanese acute-care hospitals.

PATIENTS

A total of 64,219 patients who underwent gastrostomy or jejunostomy tube insertion between July and December, 2007 to 2010, were identified among 11.6 million discharge records.

INTERVENTION

Placement of gastrostomy and jejunostomy tubes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

In-hospital mortality and the associated risk factors.

RESULTS

The mean age was 77.4 years; >90% of patients were aged >60 years. Cerebrovascular disease and pneumonia were the most frequently recorded diagnoses, followed by neuromuscular disease and dementia. The estimated annual number of gastrostomy and jejunostomy placements in Japan ranged from 96,000 to 119,000. The in-hospital mortality was 11.9%, and the significantly associated risk factors were male sex, older age, placement of a jejunostomy tube, urgent admission, hospital with lower bed capacity, the presence of malignancy, miscellaneous diseases, pneumonia, heart failure, renal failure, chronic liver diseases, pressure sores and sepsis, and occurrence of peritonitis and/or GI perforation, GI hemorrhage, and intra-abdominal hemorrhage.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective investigation of administrative database.

CONCLUSION

Our large-scale data revealed the current status of gastrostomy tube placement in Japan. This can contribute to individual decision-making and the public consensus regarding artificial nutritional support in the elderly.

Safety and feasibility of interventional pulmonologists performing bedside percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement

BACKGROUND

Prior to the 1980s, permanent feeding tube placement was limited to an open surgical procedure until Gauderer and colleagues described the safe placement of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes. This procedure has since expanded beyond the realm of surgeons to include gastroenterologists, thoracic surgeons, and interventional radiologists. In some academic centers, interventional pulmonologists (IPs) also perform this procedure. We describe the safety and feasibility of PEG tube placement by IPs in a critically ill population.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data of patients in a medical ICU undergoing PEG tube placement from 2003 to 2007 at a tertiary-care center were reviewed. Inclusion criteria included all PEG tube insertions performed or attempted by the IP team. Data were collected on mortality, PEG tube removal rate, total number of days with PEG tube, and complication rates. Follow-up included hospital length of stay and phone contact after discharge. Procedural and long-term PEG-related complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients were studied. PEG tube insertion was completed successfully in 70 (97.2%), with follow-up data in 69 of these 70. Thirty-day mortality was 11.7%. No deaths or immediate complications were attributed to PEG tube placement. PEG tube removal occurred in 27 patients, with a median time to removal of 76 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Bedside PEG tube placement can be performed safely and effectively by trained IPs. Because percutaneous tracheostomy is currently performed by IPs, the ability to place both PEG and tracheostomy tubes at the same time has the potential for decreased costs, anesthesia exposure, procedural times, ventilator times, and ICU days.

Predictive factors for early mortality after percutaneous endoscopic and radiologically-inserted gastrostomy

BACKGROUND

Gastrostomy insertion is of benefit to selected patients, but 30-day mortality is as high as 54% in some patient groups. The current study examines risk factors associated with 30-day mortality in a cohort of patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) or radiologically-inserted gastrostomy (RIG) in a district general hospital over a 2.5 year period.

METHODS

A retrospective review of case notes was performed for all patients who underwent a PEG (n=53) or RIG (n=40) insertion in the period January 2009-July 2011. PEG/RIG re-insertions were excluded. Demographic, clinical, and biochemical data were analysed. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for early mortality after gastrostomy insertion.

RESULTS

The indications for gastrostomy insertion were similar in the PEG and RIG groups and included mainly dysphagic stroke, chronic neuromuscular disease and head and neck cancer. The patients in the RIG group were older and had a higher incidence of cardiovascular co-morbidities. The overall 30-day mortality was 11% in the PEG and 40% in the RIG group. The multivariate regression analysis suggested that cardiovascular co-morbidities and RIG insertion were independent risk factors for early mortality. The main cause of death 30 days after gastrostomy insertion was pneumonia, which was significantly more common in the RIG group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that PEG should be the procedure of choice when considering gastrostomy insertion and RIG should be reserved as a second-line approach for cases in which PEG is technically difficult or contraindicated.

High In-hospital mortality after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: results of a nationwide population-based study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

It is important to carefully select patients who undergo endoscopic procedures, to optimize health care. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a frequently performed invasive endoscopic procedure that has been associated with high short-term mortality. We used a national database to determine the incidence of, and factors associated with, in-hospital mortality among patients undergoing PEG.

METHODS

We conducted a nested, case-control, retrospective study using the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) to analyze data from all hospitalizations in 2006 with an International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, procedure code for PEG. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed using demographic and clinical variables to identify predictors of in-hospital mortality after the procedure. A separate analysis using a propensity score matching technique was conducted to compare mortality with a control cohort. Results were validated in an independent analysis of 2007 NIS data.

RESULTS

In-hospital mortality was 10.8% among 181,196 patients who underwent PEG in 2006 (95% confidence interval, 10.3%-11.3%). Odds of death increased with age (1%/y), congestive heart failure, renal failure, chronic pulmonary disease, coagulopathy, pulmonary circulation disorders, metastatic cancer, and liver disease. The indication for PEG was associated strongly with mortality. Women and patients with diabetes mellitus or paralysis had a lower risk of death. PEG was associated with slightly higher odds of in-hospital mortality compared with patients who did not undergo PEG. Qualitatively and quantitatively similar results were obtained when 2007 NIS data were analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

The mortality rate is almost 11% among hospital inpatients after PEG. We have identified factors that increase and decrease the risk of death after PEG; these factors could improve patient selection for those most likely to benefit from this procedure.

Transmission of infection by flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy

Flexible endoscopy is a widely used diagnostic and therapeutic procedure. Contaminated endoscopes are the medical devices frequently associated with outbreaks of health care-associated infections. Accurate reprocessing of flexible endoscopes involves cleaning and high-level disinfection followed by rinsing and drying before storage. Most contemporary flexible endoscopes cannot be heat sterilized and are designed with multiple channels, which are difficult to clean and disinfect. The ability of bacteria to form biofilms on the inner channel surfaces can contribute to failure of the decontamination process. Implementation of microbiological surveillance of endoscope reprocessing is appropriate to detect early colonization and biofilm formation in the endoscope and to prevent contamination and infection in patients after endoscopic procedures. This review presents an overview of the infections and cross-contaminations related to flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy and illustrates the impact of biofilm on endoscope reprocessing and postendoscopic infection.

Can we use influencing factors to predict aspiration pneumonia in the United Kingdom?

Background

The current study builds upon the work of others in looking at influencing factors of aspiration pneumonia in people with a swallowing problem. This study differs from previous researches on this topic, focusing on the United Kingdom (UK) population and involving more recently defined influencing factors of aspiration pneumonia. The study aims to explore the multifactorial nature of aspiration pneumonia in a UKdysphagic client group, as well as different disease specific variables.

Methods

Speech and Language Therapists collected data on 33 influencing factors over a period of 6 months during routine bedside swallowing assessment of 687 patients. All subjects were adults referred with suspected dysphagia and included acute inpatients, head and neck cancer patients and adults with learning disabilities. The study population included 400 males and 287 females and ages ranged from 17 to 102 giving a mean age of 72.9 years. The influence of the different variables included in the study was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results

The results show that 13 statistically significant influencing factors were implicated in the development of aspiration pneumonia for this group. Out of these, nine correlate with the previous work undertaken in the United States. These were poor mobility, nil by mouth status, age, dependency for feeding, number of medications, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), number of medical conditions, stroke and alcohol abuse. Four further influencing factors were shown to be significant in the UK population, these were dysphagia, only oral intake, bedfast, and male gender.

Conclusions

This study confirms that in the UK there are influencing factors in the development of an aspiration pneumonia. It would be prudent to remember that a direct link is yet to be established when applying this knowledge to inform clinical management.

Peristomal infection after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a 7-year surveillance of 297 patients

CONTEXT

Healthcare-associated infection represents the most frequent adverse event during care delivery. Medical advances like percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy have brought improvement on quality of life to patients but an increased risk of healthcare-associated infection. Predictive risk factors for peristomal wound infection are largely unknown but evidence suggests that antibiotic prophylaxis and preventive strategies related to infection control may reduce infection rates.

OBJECTIVES

The primary aim was to evaluate the global prevalence rate of peristomal infection. Secondary objectives were to characterise the positive culture results, to evaluate the prophylactic antibiotic protocol and to identify potential risk factors for peristomal infection.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 297 patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy performed at a general hospital between January 2004 and September 2010. Patients received prophylactic cefazolin before the endoscopic gastrostomy procedure. Medical records were reviewed for demographic data, underling disease conditions to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and patient potential intrinsic risk factors. Statistical analysis was made with the statistical program SPSS 17.0.

RESULTS

A total of 297 percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes were inserted. Wound infection occurred in 36 patients (12.1%). Staphylococcus aureus methicillin resistant was the most frequently isolated microorganism (33.3%) followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (30.6%). The incidence rate had been rising each year and differ from 4.65% in 2004/2007 to 17.9% in 2008/2010. This finding was consistent with the increasing of prevalence global infection rates of the hospital. Most of the infections (55.6%) were detected in the first 10 days post procedure. There was no significant difference in age, body mass index values, mean survival time and duration of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding between patients with and without periostomal infection. Institutional factors, namely global prevalence infection rates and the endemic character of Staphylococcus aureus methicillin resistant, play an important role in peristomal infection rates. Traditional antibiotic prophylaxis with cefazolin is not adequate due to the prevalence of resistant organisms.

CONCLUSIONS

Peristomal infection is a frequent problem with clinical impact in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy patients and should be considered a healthcare associated infection. The antimicrobial prophylaxis regimens using cephalosporins are not adequate and need to be reviewed due to the high prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus methicillin resistant and other resistant organisms in hospitals and nursing homes.

Unsedated transnasal percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy carried out by a single physician

AIM

The present prospective observational study investigates the safety of transnasal percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (T-PEG) carried out by a single physician using an ultrathin endoscope.

METHODS

A single endoscopist attempted the unsedated transnasal insertion of a 20-Fr PEG tube using a pull-method in 31 dysphagic patients: 11 females and 20 males aged 76.5±10.6(46-96)years, using a 5-mm-diameter endoscope. The indications for PEG, cardiopulmonary function before and after T-PEG, operation time, success or failure, and any immediate adverse events that occurred during each procedure were recorded. Complications, including peristomal infection, systemic infection, tube lifespan, and patient mortality were monitored throughout the post-T-PEG follow-up period.

RESULTS

Thirty (96.8%) of the transnasal PEG insertions were successful. The mean operation time was 14.7±2.9 (10-20) min, and cardiopulmonary function did not change before and after T-PEG. Complications included three (10%) cases of epistaxis, eight (26.6%) cases of minor Pseudomonas wound infection and two cases of Foley-related urinary tract infection (UTI). No self-extubation was observed, and the mean lifespan of the PEG tubes was 10.7±2.2months. Four patients died from pneumonia 10months after T-PEG insertion.

CONCLUSION

Unsedated T-PEG insertion carried out by a single physician is a feasible and safe procedure. No major complications or mortality were observed following the procedures; only minor Pseudomonas aeruginosa wound infections were noted. It is an alternative method for dysphagic patients when transoral insertion of endoscopy is impossible.

Trends in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement in the elderly from 1993 to 2003

OBJECTIVES

To investigate national trends in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement for hospitalized elderly patients from 1993 to 2003.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients ≥ 65 years of age with PEG tube placement from 1993 to 2003 from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was utilized to calculate PEG placement rates per 1000 people.

RESULTS

Placement of PEG tube increased by 38% in elderly patients during the study period, from 2.71 procedures during hospitalization per 1000 people to 3.75 procedures during hospitalization per 1,000 people. Placement of PEG tube in patients with Alzheimer's dementia doubled (5%-10%) over the study period.

CONCLUSION

Over a 10-year period, PEG tube use in hospitalized elderly patients increased significantly. More importantly, approximately 1 in 10 PEG tube placements occurred in patients with dementia.

Special considerations for endoscopists on PEG indications in older patients

Undernutrition in frail elderly people is a pathological condition that needs to be recognized and addressed early. Neurological dysphagia is among the most frequent causes of this condition in the elderly but should be considered a terminal event in Alzheimer-type dementias. Tube feeding is an important resource for facilitating metabolic recovery in cachectic patients and is particularly successful in "bridging" and stabilizing therapies prior to major treatment able to cure the patient. Clinical management of tube feeding in "incurable" conditions is complex and becomes part of the palliative care and comfort provided in the terminal stages of illness. Non-specialized physicians are often unfamiliar with the theory and practice of end-of-life interventions, and the resulting decisions are in many cases actually contrary to patient comfort. These problems deserve to be more carefully addressed when the patient is unable to cooperate or express his/her preferences and needs. The success of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy has led to increasingly frequent referrals for placement in critically ill elderly patients. Endoscopists therefore become a key figure in stimulating rational, correct treatment of these patients.

Feeding tube placement: errors and complications

Feeding tube placement for enteral nutrition (EN) support is widely used in both critically ill and stable chronically ill patients who are unable to meet their nutrition needs orally. Nasal or oral feeding tubes can be performed blindly at the bedside or with fluoroscopic or endoscopic guidance into the stomach or small bowel. Percutaneous feeding tubes are used when EN support is required for longer periods (>4-6 weeks) and are most commonly placed endoscopically or radiographically. Although generally safe and effective, there is a wide spectrum of known complications associated with feeding tube placement. Errors made at the time of feeding tube placement can result in a number of these procedural and postprocedural complications. In many cases, a single error at the time of placement can result in numerous complications. A thorough knowledge of these errors and avoiding them in practice will decrease iatrogenic complications in a vulnerable population. In addition, early recognition and management of complications will further minimize morbidity and even mortality in enteral feeding tube placement. This article reviews the common errors leading to complications of enteral feeding tube placement and their prevention and management.

Does feeding tube insertion and its timing improve survival?

OBJECTIVES

To examine survival with and without a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding tube using rigorous methods to account for selection bias and to examine whether the timing of feeding tube insertion affected survival.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

All U.S. nursing homes (NHs).

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-six thousand four hundred ninety-two NH residents with advanced cognitive impairment from dementia and new problems eating studied between 1999 and 2007.

MEASUREMENTS

Survival after development of the need for eating assistance and feeding tube insertion.

RESULTS

Of the 36,492 NH residents (88.4% white, mean age 84.9, 87.4% with one feeding tube risk factor), 1,957 (5.4%) had a feeding tube inserted within 1 year of developing eating problems. After multivariate analysis correcting for selection bias with propensity score weights, no difference was found in survival between the two groups (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) = 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.94-1.13). In residents who were tube-fed, the timing of PEG tube insertion relative to the onset of eating problems was not associated with survival after feeding tube insertion (AHR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.86-1.20, persons with a PEG tube inserted within 1 month of developing an eating problem versus later (4 months) insertion).

CONCLUSION

Neither insertion of PEG tubes nor timing of insertion affect survival.

In-hospital and long-term outcomes after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with malignancy

BACKGROUND

Although percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is widely performed for nutrition or palliation, PEG-associated outcomes in cancer patients remain poorly described. We examined the safety and benefits of PEG placement in this population at our institution.

STUDY DESIGN

A 5-year retrospective review of patients with malignancy (excluding head/neck and thoracic malignancy) who underwent PEG at our institution was performed.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-nine patients with malignancy underwent PEG; 33.9% had hematologic malignancy, 66.1% had nonhematologic malignancy, and 44.4% had metastatic disease. Indications for PEG were enteral access (73%) and gastric decompression/management of obstructive symptoms (27%). Few patients achieved independence from total parenteral nutrition (22%) or diet advancement (24.6%). Overall rates of major complications (eg, aspiration, tube dislodgement/leakage, bleeding, visceral injury, respiratory failure after procedure, and cardiac arrest) and minor complications (eg, superficial infection and ileus) were 10.2% and 11.3%, respectively. All-cause in-hospital mortality was high (19.6%) and was associated with ICU admission (p = 0.018), earlier bone marrow transplantation (p = 0.022), steroid treatment (p = 0.024), and lower preoperative albumin (p = 0.003). Code status was changed after PEG in 44 patients from full code to DNR/do no intubate or comfort measures only.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement in this study population was associated with major procedure-related complications. The majority of patients failed to achieve total parenteral nutrition independence or advancement of diet. Nearly 25% of patients declined aggressive resuscitation strategies after undergoing surgery for PEG. This study cautions to carefully weigh the risks and benefits of PEG placement in this patient population. Prospective studies are needed to uncover factors affecting the decision process and patient selection.